<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<generator>Connect v.2.2</generator>
	<title>In The News</title>
	<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2">The following are articles of interest to the Christian community regarding legislative updates, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and moral issues.<br />
These are updated often to keep you aware of what is going on in our county, state, country, and world. </font></p>]]></description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:10:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<managingEditor>jeremy_refuge@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>jeremy_refuge@yahoo.com</webMaster>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[Under Construction]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5826</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5826</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h1>56th National Day of Prayer</h1>
<h2 class="subhead">This year&rsquo;s National Day of Prayer will be celebrated May 3rd.</h2>
<div id="contentArea">
<ul class="tools toolsTop">
    <li class="printPage"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://family.org/faith/a000001898.cfm#">Print this page</a> </li>
    <li class="forward"><a rel="nofollow">Forward to a friend</a> </li>
</ul>
<div id="articleArea">
<div id="leftColumn">
<div class="byline">from Shirley Dobson, NDP Chairman </div>
<div>On Thursday, May 3rd, all across our nation in church events and public venues from coast to coast, hearts and hands will be joined together for the 56th Annual National Day of Prayer.</div>
<div>This year&rsquo;s theme, &ldquo;America, Unite in Prayer,&rdquo; comes from the promise the Lord gave us in II Chronicles 7:14:</div>
<blockquote>
<div><em>&ldquo;If my people, who are called by my name will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.&rdquo; </em></div>
</blockquote>
<div>We hope this message will not only serve as a catalyst to encourage God&rsquo;s people to take prayer for our nation seriously, but that it will draw believers closer together as they intercede corporately on behalf of our country.</div>
<div>I truly believe God is calling His people to be faithful for such a time as this. If you would like more information on how you might unite with your fellow citizens to intercede on behalf of this great nation, I invite you to visit our Web site at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nationaldayofprayer.org/">www.nationaldayofprayer.org</a>. </div>
<div>For further reading: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.family.org/faith/A000001917.cfm">What Makes Prayer Work?</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5825</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5825</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">U.S. House to Take Up Legislation to Protect Life</font></strong></div>
<div>by Jennifer Mesko, associate editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Democratic majority threatens a dozen pro-life riders.</em>
<div>
<div>As Congress begins to take up annual appropriations bills, lawmakers also will have to decide on several pro-life riders to those bills -- riders are provisions regularly attached to unrelated legislation that's likely to pass.</div>
<div>In the past, the riders generally have survived. This year, with Democrats in charge, it could be a different story.</div>
<div>Such riders include the Kemp-Kasten amendment, which prevents funding for organizations that participate in coercive abortion programs; the Hyde Amendment, which bans federal funding of abortions, except in cases of rape, incest or life of the mother; and the Helms Amendment, which prevents foreign aid from being spent on abortion services.</div>
<div>&ldquo;We have every reason to believe that (President) Bush will soon issue a letter that will basically say that he will veto legislation &hellip; if there is any attempt to weaken or nullify&rdquo; current pro-life policy, Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., told LifeSiteNews.</div>
<div>&ldquo;The use of these &lsquo;riders&rsquo; really goes back to the 1970s,&rdquo; said Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee. &ldquo;One of the few opportunities for the pro-life community to advance anything was the appropriations bills.&rdquo;</div>
<div>An estimated 1 million preborn babies have been saved since 1976, thanks to the Hyde Amendment, Johnson said.</div>
<div>&ldquo;The advantage is, of course, Congress does have to appropriate money to keep the government running,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;These bills are vehicles that do get signed into law. The downside is &hellip; they have to be re-enacted every year.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Johnson said &ldquo;there are enemies for each and every one&rdquo; of the 12 pro-life provisions. The Democrats will have to decide if they want to embroil their bills in an abortion fight and a veto threat.</div>
<div>&ldquo;Numerous pro-life riders have provided a longstanding crucial framework within which to protect and expand the culture of life,&rdquo; said Ashley Horne, federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family Action.</div>
<div>&ldquo;People need to contact their representative and senators, urging them to protect these pro-life riders.&rdquo;</div>
<div><strong>FOR MORE INFORMATION<br />
</strong>Click <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/pdfs/rider_congress_letter.pdf">here</a> to see the letter from the representatives and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/pdfs/rider_senate_letter.pdf">here</a> to see the one from senators.</div>
<div>TAKE ACTION<br />
Urge your representative and senators to protect the pro-life riders in the appropriations bills and to vote for pro-life provisions in the bills reported out of the Appropriations Committee. If you are a CitizenLink Daily Update subscriber, click on the blue &quot;Protect Pro-Life Riders&quot; button in the e-mail to be automatically logged in to our Action Center. Otherwise, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/dotnet/WebPublish/controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&amp;Definition=Home&amp;XSL=Home&amp;SV_Section=Home">click on this link</a>.</div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5824</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5824</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Senate Committee Will Vote on Suspending RU 486 Abortion Drug</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
April 17</em><em>, 2007</em><br />
</div>
<div class="text" style="COLOR: #606060"><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>A leading pro-life senator is set to offer amendments to a bill on Wednesday that would put limits in place on the dangerous RU 486 abortion drug that has claimed the lives of at least six women in the United States and five more internationally.
<div>The debate will come as the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee considers a bill related to the Food and Drug Administration.</div>
<div>According to documents provided to LifeNews.com, Senator Tom Coburn, a Oklahoma Republican, will be offering two RU-486 amendments to the bill.</div>
<div>The first amendment would suspend the availability of any drug approved under FDA&rsquo;s subpart H category that has resulted in more deaths than lives saved. While the abortion pill has taken the lives of six women, it is not responsible for saving anyone.</div>
<div>The second would lift the liability protection that currently shields mifepristone, one of the two drugs in the RU 486 abortion process, so that women (and their families) who are injured, harmed or killed as a result of use of this drug can seek damages.</div>
<div>The Senate has never held a vote on the abortion drug, but, with Democrats controlling the chamber's committees, the amendments appear unlikely to be added to the bill.</div>
<div>Democrats control 11 seats on the Senate HELP Committee and neither of the two pro-life Democrats in the Senate sit on the panel. Meanwhile, all of the 10 Republican members of the committee have consistent pro-life voting records on the issue of abortion.</div>
<div>According to FDA reports as of December, there have now been eight known deaths associated with RU 486, nine life-threatening incidents, 116 blood transfusions, and 232 hospitalizations. In total, more than 1,050 women have had medical problems after using the drug.</div>
<div>The first victim of RU 486 was a Tennessee woman who died after using the abortion drug. She had an undetected ectopic pregnancy, and the drug is not supposed to be used in such situations.</div>
<div>Following her death, four California women died from using the abortion drug and the FDA announced last year that a Colorado woman had died as well.</div>
<div>Women have died from using the abortion drug in Canada, England, France and Sweden.</div>
<div>ACTION: Contact the members of the Senate HELP committee and urge them to strongly support the Coburn RU 486 amendments to the FDA bill. You can find a list of the committee members at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://help.senate.gov/">http://help.senate.gov</a>. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Printed from: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat3040.html">http://www.lifenews.com/nat3040.html</a></em><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5823</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5823</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h2>U.S. House Poised to Vote on Grassroots Communication</h2>
<div class="author">by Jennifer Mesko, associate editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>This bill would effectively gag grassroots action groups and their constituents.</em>
<div class="text">
<div>Legislation that would have silenced grassroots communication failed in the U.S. Senate this year after concerned citizens let their voices be heard. Now, the U.S. House is set to vote on the same issue.</div>
<div>The bill would bury organizations like Focus on the Family in needless paperwork and burdensome reporting requirements any time it communicates to constituents on public policy issues that are before Congress, with the threat of severe fines and criminal penalties.</div>
<div>Tom Minnery, senior vice president of government and public policy for Focus on the Family Action, sent <a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://focusaction.org/pdfs/grassroots_comm_restrict.pdf">a letter </a>to members of the House Judiciary Committee that urges them to reject &quot;any legislative attempts to stifle grassroots interactions with Members of Congress and the Executive Branch.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;While we applaud efforts to make Congress more transparent and accountable,&quot; he wrote, &quot;we have serious concerns that the legislative package will include provisions regulating grassroots communications - communication by individual constituents who are freely and voluntarily expressing their views on important issues to Members of Congress and the Executive Branch.&quot;</div>
<div>Peter Brandt, senior director of government and public policy for Focus on the Family Action, said it also would tie the hands of groups like the American Family Association, the National Right to Life Committee and others.<br />
 <br />
&ldquo;It would tie up the ability of average people out on Main Street USA to be able to contact their elected representatives,&rdquo; Brandt told Family News in Focus.<br />
 <br />
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., promises to move quickly on the legislation.<br />
 <br />
&ldquo;It seems like there&rsquo;s an agenda being carried out in Washington to ignore the voice of the people,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;This is very, very problematic.&rdquo;<br />
 <br />
The bill is so egregious that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has joined the fight to oppose it.<br />
 <br />
&quot;Obviously, (lawmakers) don&rsquo;t understand that if a constituent picks up the phone, it doesn&rsquo;t matter whether they were contacted by a business, or by Focus on the Family or whoever. They are a constituent,&quot; ACLU spokesman Marv Johnson told Family News in Focus.<br />
 <br />
The bill could get a vote in the House in the next two weeks.</div>
<div>&ldquo;This is one of the most important bills to which our constituents will lend their voices because it affects Focus&rsquo; ability to spur our constituents to action in the future,&rdquo; said Ashley Horne, federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family Action. &ldquo;If members of Congress do not hear about the terrible effect a &lsquo;grassroots gag order&rsquo; would have on their constituents, the future looks very dim for the average citizen to make his or her voice heard.&rdquo;</div>
<div><strong>TAKE ACTION</strong><br />
Urge your representative to oppose H.R. 984 and any other &ldquo;Grassroots Gag Order&quot; legislation. Because of the gravity of the situation, we're asking that you send an e-mail, sign a petition and call your representative.</div>
<div>-- We've prewritten an e-mail for you to send. If you are a <em>CitizenLink Daily Update </em>subscriber, click on the blue &quot;Oppose Grassroots Gag Order Bill&quot; button in the e-mail to be automatically logged in to our Action Center. Otherwise, <a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/dotnet/WebPublish/controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&amp;Definition=Home&amp;XSL=Home&amp;SV_Section=Home">click on this link</a>.</div>
<div>-- Then <a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.focuspetitions.com/105/petition.asp">click here </a>to sign the Focus on the Family Action petition.</div>
<div>-- Finally, call your representative's office and let the office staff know your position on the grassroots lobbying bill. Such calls usually take less than a minute. You can find your representative's contact information on the <a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.house.gov/">House Web site</a>. Look for &quot;Find Your Representative&quot; at the top of the page.</div>
<div><em>(NOTE: Referral to Web sites not produced by Focus on the Family is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily constitute an endorsement of the sites' content.)</em></div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5822</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5822</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">The 'Emerging Church': Straying from the Gospel<br />
<hr size="1" />
</font><font size="-1">Posted: April 14, 2007<br />
1:00 a.m. Eastern<br />
<br />
</font>
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Rev. Jerry Falwell<br />
<hr size="1" />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2007  </font>
<div>The late economist Peter Drucker said a few years ago: &quot;Every few hundred years in Western history there occurs a sharp transformation. ... Fifty years later, there is a new world. And the people born then cannot even imagine the world in which their grandparents lived.&quot;
<div>I believe we are witnessing a modern effort to transform the church into an institution that experiences broad cultural acceptance. This effort, known as the Emerging Church, is a much-talked about movement that has brought new challenges into the Church of Jesus Christ.
<div>The so-called Emerging Church movement was formed out of frustration with dead and irrelevant evangelicalism. The problem is that it has decided to modernize and re-create the church so as not to offend sinners. This renders virtually meaningless the life-changing message of the Gospel.
<div><em>(Column continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>John 8:32 tells us: &quot;And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.&quot; This is not truth that can be modified to fit cultural whims; it is as relevant today as it was when John was inspired by God to write those words around A.D. 170.
<div>However, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.leadnet.org/">the website of The Leadership Network</a>, the headquarters of the Emerging (or sometimes Emergent) Church movement, states that their outlook on &quot;truth&quot; offers a &quot;flexible approach to theology whereby individual differences in belief and morality are accepted within reason.&quot;
<div>The site further states that members wish to &quot;reanalyze the Bible against the context into which it was written.&quot;
<div>This is very dangerous territory.
<div>Such a view opens perilous avenues that enable suggestions that Jesus is not the Christ, that the Bible is not inspired by God Himself and that there are ways to heaven other than through Jesus. Such notions counter the very fabric of the Gospel.
<div>In this era of diversity and political correctness, we can ill afford to weaken the very foundations of the Gospel.
<div>But the Emerging Church has determined that core doctrine and theology are sometimes roadblocks to converting the lost.
<div>This is the epitome of contradiction.
<div>Further, Emerging Church groups have decided that profanity and vulgar talk from the pulpit and elsewhere is acceptable because it is relevant to the culture. Such teachings counter the biblical teachings that Christians are &quot;new creatures in Christ.&quot;
<div>Another problem of the Emerging Church is that its leaders, who no doubt started out with good intentions, have very little theological training. Their emphasis has been on appearances. Many of its leaders have been to &quot;conferences&quot; that tell them how to do things, but they don't know why they are doing them. Thus, they have a little bit of knowledge, but no wisdom.
<div>Dr. James McDonald spoke my feelings when he said: &quot;I resonate deeply with much of the criticism flowing from the Emerging Church against current Western Christianity, but I am deeply grieved to see the emergent remedies accepted so uncritically by those who feel gratified by the accuracy of their critiques.&quot;
<div>While I have no problem with the church adapting to the culture, we must ensure that we remain painstakingly true to the Gospel of Jesus Christ and that we remain obedient servants to His truths.
<div>As Jesus stated: &quot;He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me &hellip;&quot; (John 14:21). </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5821</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5821</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>   </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font color="#003399" size="4">Jesus vs. Muhammad: A Tale of Two Mockings</font></strong>
<div>by <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.humanevents.com/search.php?author_name=Ericka Andersen">Ericka Andersen</a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.humanevents.com/search.php?author_name=Ericka+Andersen"><font color="#000099">(more by this author)</font></a></div>
<div>Posted 04/06/2007 ET<br />
<br />
</div>
<br />
<div>We are almost immune to the calculated disrespect with which the arts and entertainment community treats the most revered religious personality in American history. Last week, two artists produced versions of Jesus Christ for a shock to coincide with the Easter holiday. <br />
 <br />
Casimo Cavallaro unveiled a crucifixion sculpture, created from 200 pounds of milk chocolate. The figure raised immediate concerns when it was revealed that it would not feature a loincloth covering -- but would be anatomically correct and completely nude.<br />
 <br />
In the second instance, David Cordello, a senior at The Art Insitute of Chicago , fashioned a statue of presidential contender Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.) as Jesus. Capped with a neon halo and lifting his hands in peace, the effigy is a physical enrichment of the senator&rsquo;s recently elevated public persona. <br />
 <br />
These examples are not unlike last year&rsquo;s mockery of another religious figure. When the Prophet Mohammad was ridiculed in a series of Danish editorial cartoons, the Muslim community worldwide reacted violently. <br />
 <br />
Flags were burned, nations were condemned, death threats were thrown like confetti and a media-fed frenzy built around the supposed defamation of Islam. American newspapers wouldn&rsquo;t print the cartoons &ldquo;out of respect&rdquo; for the self-styled &ldquo;religion of peace.&rdquo; <br />
 <br />
When television stations refused to air the cartoons, syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin forced them on screen during a Fox News interview after finding frustration with the media&rsquo;s cowardice. Of the current debacle, Malkin asked in a March 30 blog post, &ldquo;Where's the MSM's [mainstream media] concern for avoiding deliberately provocative religious insults now?&rdquo; <br />
 <br />
While the media declined to feed their otherwise insatiable ratings appetites by omitting the cartoons from their coverage last year, they now act intrigued and amused broadcasting the Jesus figures -- and have published material widely. Consider the public reaction had these latest stunts been perpetrated on the world&rsquo;s purportedly most &ldquo;respected&rdquo; faith. <br />
 <br />
The Catholic League&rsquo;s Keira McCaffery elementally pointed out, &ldquo;They wouldn&rsquo;t do something like this to Muslims&hellip;no naked chocolate sculpture of Muhummad, with genitals exposed, on Ramadan.&rdquo; <br />
 <br />
The league did get the chocolate Jesus show canceled, but photos were still broadcast without concern for religious &ldquo;respect.&rdquo; The gallery&rsquo;s creative director Matt Semler quit in protest, labeled the artist a &ldquo;victim&rdquo; and called it a &ldquo;Catholic fatwa.&rdquo;   <br />
 <br />
The left constantly cries bigotry, homophobia, and judgmentalism at Christians&rsquo; questioning of immoral behavior. This is perfectly consistent with Fox News Chicago's coverage of the Jesus-Barack exhibit, in which a bystander said, &ldquo;Jesus is a concept that hasn&rsquo;t really unified the US . Christianity has also really kind of caused a lot conflict within our country and a lot of countries so it could be read in two different ways&hellip;&rdquo; <br />
 <br />
If these words were said of Muhammad in an identical circumstance, the backlash would be deafening -- just as it was when the Pope read one line of a 14th century quote from a Byzantine emperor saying Muhammad brought only &ldquo;evil and inhuman things to the world.&rdquo; There would be no photos. There would be no acceptance. There would be no amusement. And you can bet the American press corps would march in straight-backed obedience out of &ldquo;respect&rdquo; for Islam. <br />
 <br />
In his book, &ldquo;The Truth About Muhammad,&quot; Robert Spencer carefully documents the utter intolerance of Islam itself, concluding that, &ldquo;People can be convinced of something they wish to believe, regardless of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.&rdquo;<br />
 <br />
Believe this: Obama as Mohammad wouldn&rsquo;t fly and encapsulating Christ in chocolate (a &ldquo;sinful&rdquo; treat no less) is demeaning. Also, the unnecessary nudity belies Christ&rsquo;s last physical shred of dignity, adding to the offense.<br />
 <br />
Christians are instructed to use the Lord&rsquo;s name and image reverently. By calculatedly employing it to the opposite shows utter disrespect for God&rsquo;s holiness.<br />
 <br />
Many Americans prepare to celebrate the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus this Easter weekend. If only Christianity were as &ldquo;respected&rdquo; in America as Islam.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5820</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5820</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3 class="entry-header">Ford pledges to continue support for homosexual activism</h3>
<div class="entry" id="entry-2114">
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body">Ed Thomas<br />
<small><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">March 14, 2007</font></small><br />
<br />
<div>The Ford Motor Company will continue to be the target of a boycott by the American Family Association, after the automaker publicly announced its support for homosexual activism.</div>
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/audio/2007/03/14/EDFORDUPDATEVOICER.mp3">Hear This Report</a> </div>
<br />
<div class="entry-more" id="more">
<div>AFA chairman Don Wildmon says his organization gave Ford the benefit of the doubt, based on the company's actions, that it had apparently decided to stop supporting homosexual causes and publications.</div>
<div>&quot;We we're wrong,&quot; Wildmon admitted. &quot;Ford simply, publicly reinforced the fact that they are still giving their support to the homosexual groups, which, incidentally, have as their top agenda item the legalization of marriage of two people of the same sex.&quot;</div>
<div>AFA reported last week to its supporters, that Ford was no longer advertising in prominent homosexual magazines, and had dropped support of The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) Media Awards.</div>
<div>But last week Ford was listed as a sponsor for the Detroit Motor City Pride Festival. And Wildmon says AFA's conclusion to its supporters that Ford was silently trying to withdraw, was denied by a company spokesperson in a Detroit newspaper.</div>
<div>&quot;They went public to the <em>Detroit News</em> and said, 'No,' they're still supporting the homosexual festivals, 'gay' pride festivals, and they're still supporting the homosexual publications,&quot; Wildmon said.</div>
<div>Wildmon says Ford had not advertised in key homosexual publications for three months. But spokesperson Kristen Kinley said the dropping of the GLAAD awards, and all the automaker's advertising and sponsorship decisions, are &quot;strictly driven by business considerations,&quot; and not pressure from AFA -- according to the Detroit News.</div>
<div>AFA's chairman now says the group's supporters will continue their boycott against Ford, in light of its media statements last weekend.<br />
</div>
<br />
<small><em><font size="2">Editor's Note: The American Family Association is the parent organization of the American Family News Network, which operates OneNewsNow.com. </font></em></small></div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5114</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5114</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Illinois High School Orders Students Not to tell Parents about Homosexual Propaganda Sessions</strong><a rel="nofollow" name="3"></a><br />
<br />
<div>By Gudrun Schultz<br />
<br />
DEEFIELD, <span id="lw_1173958165_14" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Illinois</span>, March 14, 2007 (<span id="lw_1173958165_15" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">LifeSiteNews.com</span>) - Fourteen-year-old students at an Illinois high school were told to keep their attendance at a school panel discussion promoting homosexuality a secret from their parents, Concerned Women for America reported on Christian Newswire March 13.<br />
<br />
Students at Deerfield High School were required to attend a &ldquo;Straight Gay Alliance Network&rdquo; panel led by upperclassmen identified as homosexual, as part of an advisory class that promoted homosexuality. Students were also required to sign a &ldquo;confidentiality agreement&rdquo; before attending the session that forbade them from telling anyone--including their parents--about the panel material.<br />
<br />
Matt Barber, Policy Director for Cultural Issues with Concerned Women for America (CWA), said the school&lsquo;s policy was &ldquo;unbelievable.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;It's not enough that students at Deerfield High are being exposed to improper and offensive material relative to unhealthy and high-risk homosexual behaviors, but they've essentially been told by teachers to lie to their parents about it,&rdquo; Barber said in a press statement.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;This goes to the heart of the homosexual agenda. The professional propagandists in the 'gay-rights' lobby know the method all too well. If you can maintain control of undeveloped and impressionable youth and spoon-feed them misinformation, lies and half-truths about dangerous, disordered and extremely risky behaviors, then you can control the future and ensure that those behaviors are not only fully accepted, but celebrated. That's what homosexual activists from GSA are attempting to do, and that's what DHS is clearly up to as well.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Dr. George Fornero, superintendent of DHS' Dist. 113, told CWA that the district &ldquo;made a mistake&rdquo; by requiring children to sign the confidentiality agreement and that it would be entirely aboveboard and honest with parents in the future.<br />
<br />
However, parents were told that they were not welcome to attend the &ldquo;advisory&rdquo; sessions and were denied access to the materials used on the curriculum.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Until DHS and other government schools across the country are made to stop promoting the homosexual agenda, kids will continue to be exposed to -- and encouraged to participate in -- a lifestyle that places them at high risk for life-threatening disease, depression and spiritual despair,&rdquo; said Barber.<br />
<br />
A local pro-family group, <span id="lw_1173958165_16" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">North Shore</span> Student Advocacy, wants the school to cancel the panel, Associated <span id="lw_1173958165_17" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Content.com</span> reported. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The school makes heterosexuality and homosexuality equivalent, and our country is deeply divided on that,&rdquo; said Lora Sue Hauser, a Deerfield resident and leader of the advocacy group.<br />
<br />
The group published a full-page advertisement March 1 in the Deerfield Review, accusing the school of promoting the agenda of homosexual activist groups.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We believe these students are being used to further the causes of gay activists,&rdquo; the ad stated, demanding that school officials &ldquo;rein in your staff who are using the school to promote their personal views.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Parental efforts to prevent their children&rsquo;s exposure to pro-homosexual material in the classroom have increasingly met with opposition, in some cases from the courts. In <span id="lw_1173958165_18" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Massachusetts</span> a federal court ruled Christian parents could not remove their children from an elementary school classroom during sessions advocating the homosexual lifestyle to students, WorldNetDaily reported.<br />
<br />
U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf wrote in his decision, &ldquo;An exodus from class when issues of homosexuality or same-sex marriage are to be discussed could send the message that gays, lesbians, and the children of same-sex parents are inferior and, therefore, have a damaging effect on those students.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
An appeal of the decision is pending.<br />
<br />
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5113</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5113</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Study: Women Having Abortions More Likely to Engage in Child Abuse</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
March 13</em><em>, 2007</em><br />
</div>
<div class="text" style="COLOR: #606060"><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>A new study finds that women who have a history of abortion are more likely to abuse children born from subsequent pregnancies. The study, published in the Internet Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatology, confirms previous research which suggests that there is a link between abortion and child abuse.
<div>The study is based on an analysis of data on 237 low-income women in Baltimore who had physically mistreated or neglected at least one of their children or allowed someone else to do so. </div>
<div>While all the women in the study had some connection with child maltreatment or neglect, the authors found that those who reported a history of abortion reported significantly more frequent acts of physical violence, such as slapping, hitting or beating, directed at their children. </div>
<div>Dr. Priscilla Coleman, a researcher at Bowling Green State University in Ohio, was the lead author of the new report. </div>
<div>She talked with LifeNews.com about its findings and said that only a few studies have examined the association between abortion history and child maltreatment.</div>
<div>Coleman explained that there are many possible explanations for the association -- including &quot;unresolved bereavement, disruption of mother-child attachment mechanisms, feelings of abortion-related guilt, and/or negative mental health effects of the abortion.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;In this particular study we found that the severity of abuse was more pronounced among mothers with a history of abortion compared to those without a history,&quot; Coleman said. &quot;This makes sense since we do know that abortion can precipitate difficult to resolve anger issues.&quot; </div>
<div>&quot;For many years the impact of abortion was believed to be minimal and time limited,&quot; Coleman told LifeNews.com. &quot;However, it seems the more we study it, the longer and more<br />
pervasive the effects of abortion seem to be on not only the women involved, but their families as well.&quot;</div>
<div>The study found that press to have an abortion may also be impact later cases of child abuse.</div>
<div>The research indicated that grief may be more difficult to resolve if women undergo an unwanted abortion due to pressure from others. In one study, cited by Coleman, 64 percent of American women with a history of abortion reported feeling pressured to abort by others.</div>
<div>Dr. David Reardon, director of the Illinois-based Elliot Institute and a leading researcher who has been involved in more than a dozen studies on the impact of abortion on women, responded to Coleman's study.</div>
<div>He said it confirms the general findings of previous studies linking abortion with a higher risk of abuse or neglect. </div>
<div><br />
&quot;Previous research has also shown that abortion is linked with a subsequent increased risk of alcoholism, drug use, anxiety, rage, anger and psychiatric hospitalization,&quot; Reardon said. &quot;Any of these factors, individually or in combination, can significantly increase the personal and family stresses that can lead to maltreatment or neglect.&quot;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>A previous study by Coleman found that a maternal history of abortion was linked to less supportive home environments for subsequently born children and that subsequent children exhibited more behavioral problems than the children of women without a history of abortion. </div>
<div><br />
Other research conducted in New Zealand tracked young women from birth to 25 years of age found that young women who had abortions were significantly more likely to experience subsequent depression, suicidal behavior and substance abuse, even after the researchers controlled for previous mental health problems. </div>
<div>&quot;Taken all together, these studies show that the mental health effects of abortion don't stop with women,&quot; Reardon said. &quot;They will impact their families, too.&quot;</div>
<div>Coleman's team suggested that professionals should be aware of the links between abortion and maternal mental health problems.</div>
<div>She suggested that they &quot;sensitively inquire about any history of abortion and related, unresolved negative emotions when working with women engaged in or at risk for aberrant parenting.&quot;</div>
<div>Finally, the authors concluded that while additional research is always needed, there can no longer be any doubt that abortion significantly impacts the health of women and their families.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;For years, abortion was construed to be a benign medical procedure carrying little if any potential for lasting adverse effects,&quot; they wrote.</div>
<div>However ... the last several years have brought greater understanding that abortion for many women is an issue with profound physical, psychological, spiritual and lifestyle dimensions that are intimately tied to many aspects of their lives,&quot; they said.</div>
<div>Related web sites:<br />
Read the new study at the Internet Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatology <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ispub.com/ostia/index.php?xmlFilePath=journals/ijpn/vol6n2/abortion.xml3">website</a>.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5112</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5112</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h2>U.S. Senate May Vote on Embryo Research</h2>
<div class="author"></div>
<div>
<div><em></em>
<div class="text">
<div>The U.S. Senate may vote this week on a bill that would force taxpayers to fund destructive embryonic stem-cell research.  The House approved the bill earlier this year.  </div>
<div>President Bush has promised to veto it.</div>
<div>&quot;If history repeats itself, senators will hear some wildly inaccurate statements from their colleagues who are pushing this immoral legislation, including claims that the federal government 'bans' and refuses to fund embryonic stem cell research,&quot; said Carrie Earll, senior analyst for bioethics for Focus on the Family Action. &quot;That's simply not true.  This research is underway and limited federal funding has been in place for six years to the tune of $600 million dollars. The issue before the Senate will be whether our tax dollars will be used as an incentive for scientists to destroy living human embryos in the process.&quot; <br />
 <br />
<strong>TAKE ACTION<br />
</strong>Contact your two senators and urge them to oppose any bill which uses your tax dollars to support research that destroys human embryos.</div>
<div>For help in contacting your lawmakers, please see the <a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/WebPublish/controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&amp;Definition=Home&amp;XSL=Home&amp;SV_Section=Home">CitizenLink Action Center</a>. </div>
<div>To help you understand the embryonic stem-cell issue, we recommend Dawn Vargo's article, &quot;<a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/FOSI/bioethics/cloning/A000002145.cfm">What the Media Won't Tell You about Embryonic Stem-Cell Research</a>.&quot;</div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5111</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5111</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h2>Gay Activists Take Aim at Tony Dungy</h2>
<div class="author">by Pete Winn, associate editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Indianapolis Colts coach's Christian pro-family beliefs challenged.</em>
<div class="text">
<div>Homosexual activists are upset that Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy will appear next week at a banquet sponsored by an organization that supports the definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman.</div>
<div>Jim Buzinski, co-founder of OutSports.com, a Web site aimed at the homosexual audience, claims that Indiana Family Institute (IFI) is a political organization. </div>
<div>&quot;He is speaking at the dinner next week in front of group that is very much a political organization,&quot; Buzinski said.<br />
 <br />
IFI President Curt Smith said neither the dinner nor the award is political. </div>
<div>&quot;The purpose of this award is to celebrate those who live out the family ethic that we think is at the heart of a healthy and successful society,&quot; Smith said. &quot;There was no five-point quiz where he had to agree with us on a number of public policy questions. In inviting him and then following up with a letter, we didn't discuss public policy.&quot;</div>
<div>Jim Daly, president of Focus on the Family Action, said gay groups would like to silence anyone they perceive as opposing the gay agenda -- even a celebrated athlete or coach. </div>
<div>It's called &quot;Christophobia.&quot; </div>
<div>&quot;Unfortunately, this is becoming a pattern for those that oppose Christianity,&quot; he added. &quot;They want to control our speech in the public square, embarrass us and try to belittle us. It really is a form of fascism.&quot;</div>
<div>Dungy was not available for interviews, but the Colts organization issued a statement saying that the coach is free to speak to any group he wishes. </div>
<div>&quot;The club does not take positions in political issues in which it is not directly involved,&quot; the statement said. &quot;The Colts do not endorse any political or religious position taken by any group that any Colts employee decides to speak or lend his or her name to.&quot;</div>
<div>The Rev. J. Peter Gallagher, a chaplain for the Colts, told CitizenLink that Dungy has been up-front all along about who he is -- and Indianapolis is very comfortable with the coach and his beliefs. </div>
<div>&quot;They know him to be a Christian man, who has placed his life in God's hands,&quot; Gallagher said. &quot;I don&rsquo;t think that's really changed. What he was before, he still is. The only thing that's changed is the fact that he's now a Super Bowl-winning coach.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5110</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5110</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Protection of Religious Freedom Undertaken by U.S. Attorney General Initiative</strong><a rel="nofollow" name="2"></a><br />
Government will create Justice Department Task Force on Religious Liberty<br />
<br />
<div>By Gudrun Schultz<br />
<br />
<span id="lw_1173783812_8" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">WASHINGTON, D.C</span>., March 12, 2007 (<span id="lw_1173783812_9" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">LifeSiteNews.com</span>) &ndash; U.S. Attorney General <span id="lw_1173783812_10" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Alberto R. Gonzales</span> launched a new initiative Feb. 20 to better protect freedom of religion in the country, in a project known as The First Freedom Project&mdash;religious freedom is listed first in the Bill of Rights and is a &ldquo;fundamental freedom on which so many of our other freedoms rest,&rdquo; said a statement released by the Department of Justice.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Preserving religious liberty requires an ongoing commitment to protecting this most basic freedom for people of all faiths,&rdquo; Gonzales said. He announced the project in a speech to the Executive Committee of the Southern Baptist Convention last month.<br />
<br />
&quot;One of our most cherished freedoms, one we've sacrificed greatly to defend, is our religious liberty,&quot; the attorney general said at the <span id="lw_1173783812_11" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">SBC</span> Building in <span id="lw_1173783812_12" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Nashville, Tenn</span>. &quot;Nothing defines us more as a nation and differentiates us more from the extremists who are our enemies than our respect for religious freedom. Our great country was founded on these principles, and many of us today believe it continues to thrive because of, not despite, them.&quot;<br />
<br />
The Freedom First Project is based on a foundational commitment to &ldquo;continued expansion of enforcement of civil rights statutes protecting religious liberty,&rdquo; the DOJ statement said.<br />
<br />
Among the commitments set out by the Project is the creation of a Justice Department Task Force on Religious Liberty, set up to review current department polices on religious liberty, to oversee religious liberty cases and to work on improving communication with concerned communities.<br />
<br />
As well, the Justice Department wants to hold a series of seminars throughout the country to better educate the public about the laws that ensure religious freedom is protected, and to offer instruction on how to file complaints. <br />
<br />
&quot;The attorney general's desire to address a major meeting of <span id="lw_1173783812_13" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">SBC</span> leaders to announce this initiative shows both the importance of the issue and the commitment of the justice department at the highest levels to defend every individual American's religious freedom rights, particularly their free exercise rights, which are too often infringed,&quot; Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics &amp; Religious Liberty Commission, told the Baptist Press. <br />
<br />
&quot;This initiative is needed and should make a real difference. When individuals find themselves in a confrontation concerning their free exercise rights, it helps to have the attorney general and the Department of Justice on your side.&quot;<br />
<br />
The announcement of the initiative was accompanied by the release of a report documenting efforts taken by the DOJ to enforce religious liberty laws over the past five years. Entitled Report on Enforcement of Laws Protecting Religious Freedom: Fiscal Years 2001-2006, the document shows an increased emphasis on enforcing religious liberty legislation, including laws banning religious discrimination in employment and public education, and laws preventing zoning authorities from discriminating against houses of worship and religious schools.<br />
<br />
&quot;I am here to ask the Southern Baptist Convention, and all of you in this room, for your help,&quot; the attorney general said. &quot;The Department of Justice has many tools to protect religious freedoms in this country, and we are using them. But even with all of our passion and our dedication to this cause, we cannot do it alone.... I am so very glad to be here among men and women who understand and share our commitment.&quot;<br />
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5109</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5109</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Controversial Former US Senator Names Abortion as Culprit in US Population Shortages</strong><a rel="nofollow" name="8"></a><br />
&ldquo;How could this great land of plenty produce too few people in the last 30 years?&rdquo; Miller asks<br />
<br />
<div>By Peter J. Smith <br />
<br />
<span id="lw_1173783576_44" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">MACON, Georgia</span>, March 12, 2007 (<span id="lw_1173783576_45" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">LifeSiteNews.com</span>) &ndash; Former US Senator Zell Miller blamed abortion as the reason why the United States faces shortages of military manpower, the impending collapse of its social security system, and depends on illegal immigration. <br />
<br />
The pro-life former Democrat appeared as the featured speaker for a fundraising banquet last Tuesday for the Sav-A-Life Care Center, which counsels women contemplating abortion. The Center was raising money to buy ultrasound equipment in order to become a health clinic.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;How could this great land of plenty produce too few people in the last 30 years?&rdquo; Miller asked his audience. &ldquo;Here is the brutal truth that no one dares to mention: We&rsquo;re too few because too many of our babies have been killed. Over 45 million since Roe v. Wade in 1973.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
&ldquo;If those 45 million children had lived, today they would be defending our country, they would be filling our jobs, they would be paying into Social Security,&rdquo; the former Georgia governor said. &ldquo;Still, we watch as 3,700 babies are killed every single day in America. It is unbelievable that a nation under God would allow this.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Miller praised the number of cures developed through adult stem-cell therapies, and condemned embryonic stem research as abortion on a smaller scale.<br />
<br />
&quot;It is not a proper fate for a human being made in God's image...killing is wrong when it is called abortion and it is just as wrong when it is called research.&quot;<br />
<br />
Miller became a pro-life champion in the US Senate after a conversion that began in the 1990s, and has generated controversy by criticizing his party&rsquo;s absolute dependence on ultraliberal activists and the abortion lobby, esp. in his 2003 book A National Party No More: the Conscience of a Conservative Democrat. The former senator even went so far as to break ranks with his party to endorse <span id="lw_1173783576_46" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">George Bush</span>&rsquo;s re-election in 2004 and give the keynote address at the <span id="lw_1173783576_47" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Republican National Convention</span>. <br />
<br />
Linking abortion to the population shortage faced in the <span id="lw_1173783576_48" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">United States</span>, however, has been politically dangerous and unpopular. Republican state Sen. Nancy Schaefer made a similar statement nearly a year ago only to retract her statements after an unfavorable reception in the mainstream media. <br />
<br />
However, Miller made it clear he will not back down from his statements, and urged other Americans to take a courageous stand against abortion. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;And sometimes in the life of a nation, a time comes when men and women of conscience and courage have to stand up and be counted and say, &lsquo;Enough! No more, this cannot continue.&rsquo;&rdquo;<br />
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5108</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5108</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="NewsTitle" id="ContentViewer1_spnTitle" style="DISPLAY: inline">
<h1>ADF attorneys file motion to dismiss criminal cases against silenced Gideons</h1>
<em>Men were harassed, arrested after distributing Bibles on public sidewalk </em><br />
</div>
<div>
<div id="ContentViewer1_divPoll" style="DISPLAY: none"></div>
<div id="ContentViewer1_spnContent">PLANTATION KEY, Fla. &mdash; Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund filed a motion Thursday to dismiss two criminal cases against two members of Gideons International.  Ernest Simpson and Anthony Mirto were arrested, charged with trespassing, and booked into jail after distributing copies of the Bible on a public sidewalk. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The First Amendment applies to all protected speech on a public sidewalk, including Christian speech,&rdquo; said ADF Senior Legal Counsel David Cortman.  &ldquo;The Gideons had every right to continue their peaceful distribution of free Bibles.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
On Jan. 19, Simpson and Mirto began distributing free copies of the Bible on a public sidewalk outside Key Largo School but did not step on to school grounds.  Both men were arrested, booked, and charged with trespassing after the school&rsquo;s principal called police (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/news/story.aspx?cid=4006">www.telladf.org/news/story.aspx?cid=4006</a>). <br />
<br />
The motion to dismiss filed by ADF attorneys in the County Court in and for Monroe County, Florida, in <em>State of Florida v. Simpson and State of Florida v. Mirto</em> is available at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/MirtoMTD.pdf">www.telladf.org/UserDocs/MirtoMTD.pdf</a>. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The charges against Mr. Simpson and Mr. Mirto, who were simply exercising their constitutional right to free speech, are entirely without merit and must be dropped immediately,&rdquo; Cortman explained. <br />
<br />
ADF is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. <br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5107</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5107</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="540" border="0">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td class="Title" colspan="3">Investing &gt; Financial planning: How to save $100,000</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td bgcolor="#666666" colspan="3"><img height="1" width="50" alt="" /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td colspan="3"> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td class="text" valign="top">
            <div class="subhead">By George M. Hiller</div>
            <div>In order to have some measure of financial freedom, it is vitally important to be able to create and maintain a savings and investment plan. Let&rsquo;s say you have a goal to build your savings and investments to $100,000. How could you save that amount? <br />
            <br />
            The achievement of a major financial goal typically is the result of taking many small steps over time, maintaining discipline in keeping to your plan, and not giving up when you encounter setbacks.<br />
            <br />
            Most people are capable of saving $100,000 or more if they are willing to follow a reasonable savings plan and be guided by biblical principles of financial management. <br />
            <br />
            Biblical financial management is based on the fundamental principle that &ldquo;God owns it all&rdquo; and we are called to be faithful stewards of the financial resources that He has entrusted to us.<br />
            <br />
            Adopting this principle and making it part of your basic belief system will profoundly impact your financial behavior. It will positively affect financial decisions that you make in the areas of spending, giving, saving, and increasing debt or paying off debt. <br />
            <br />
            When you become a steward your financial behavior will change because your priorities will change. Typically, you may experience a desire to control spending, to give more and save more, and to become debt free. Biblically relevant help, together with commitment and a financial plan, can make it possible to achieve these objectives.<br />
            <br />
            If your goal is to save $100,000 you can begin by breaking it up into smaller goals. Depending upon where you are starting, your short-term goal may be to save $1,000 or $5,000 or $10,000. Your mid-term goal may be to save $25,000 to $50,000. Your long-term goal would be to save $100,000 or more. <br />
            <br />
            Your short-term goal is one that you plan to achieve within one year. Your mid-term goal typically may be achieved within five years. Your long-term goal may be one that you plan to achieve over a period of longer than five years.<br />
            <br />
            Some people may feel that because of their particular circumstances, accumulating $100,000 in savings and investments is an impossible goal.<br />
            <br />
            God wants the very best for you, and with His help and your willingness to learn and apply biblical principles of financial management, the impossible becomes possible. Let&rsquo;s look at what it takes to achieve this goal.<br />
            <br />
            We will assume that you can earn 6 percent on your investments. Currently, most money market funds, short-term certificates of deposit, and Treasury securities are paying less than 6 percent.<br />
            <br />
            But investment returns in diversified large capitalization stocks over the last 80 years have averaged in the range of 10 percent to 11 percent.<br />
            <br />
            If you have a mix of investments in money market funds, certificates of deposit and quality mutual funds, it is not unreasonable that you might expect to earn at least 6 percent over time. Most investments carry some degree of risk, and future returns are not guaranteed. <br />
            <br />
            Let&rsquo;s assume that you are starting from scratch and you want to accumulate $100,000. How much money must you save monthly at a net investment return of 6 percent and how long will it take to reach your goal?<br />
            <br />
            The table below demonstrates the simple fact that the less you save the longer it takes to reach the goal. Another way to look at this is that as you get older, you have fewer years left to achieve your goal, and the amount of monthly savings required rises sharply. The lesson here is that the best time to start on your goal to accumulate $100,000 is right now.<br />
            <br />
            HOW MUCH MUST I SAVE AND HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO REACH $100,000<br />
            (Assuming a 6-percent return on investment)<br />
            <table width="229" border="1">
                <tbody>
                    <tr>
                        <th class="greytext" scope="col" width="106">
                        <div align="center">Monthly savings required</div>
                        </th>
                        <th class="greytext" scope="col" width="107">
                        <div align="center">Years needed to reach $100,000</div>
                        </th>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$49.96</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">40 years</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$99.06</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">30 years</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$143.58</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">25 years</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$215.35</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">20 years</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$342.15</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">15 years</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$607.17</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">10 years</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$1,426.15</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">5 years</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$2,529.55</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">3 years</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$3.912.50</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">2 years</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">$8,066.31</div>
                        </td>
                        <td class="greytext">
                        <div align="center">1 year</div>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                </tbody>
            </table>
            <br />
            <br />
            <strong>George M. Hiller, JD, LLM, MBA, CFP&reg; is the founder and president of the George M. Hiller Companies, LLC, an investment management, tax, estate and financial planning firm based in Atlanta, Georgia. He is a member of the Christian Financial Professionals Network.</strong><br />
            </div>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5106</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5106</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="Verdana14Bold"><strong>For the Sake of the Planet?</strong></span><br />
<span class="red10bold">By Chuck Colson</span><br />
<span class="Verdana9Blue">Friday, March 9, 2007</span><br />
<div>Joan Blades describes herself as, among other things, a &ldquo;nature lover&rdquo; and a &ldquo;mother.&rdquo; She is also a co-founder of the liberal activist group MoveOn.org and a regular contributor to the liberal blog <em>The Huffington Post</em>.
<div>In a recent post, Blades wrote about an article she read in her local paper. It described a group that supports the kind of measures Blades expected liberals like <em>Huffington Post</em> readers to support: health care for children, &ldquo;fair wages,&rdquo; and flexible work schedules for moms.
<div>What Blades found surprising were some of the comments that came into the paper&rsquo;s website. One person &ldquo;reasoned&rdquo; that if he has to pay $25 for a dog license, why should parents expect help when they &ldquo;choose&rdquo; to have kids. Another commenter simply wrote, &ldquo;Can&rsquo;t feed &rsquo;em, don&rsquo;t breed &rsquo;em.&rdquo;
<div>Of course, this is the Internet we&rsquo;re talking about. Still, Blades felt compelled to refute the erroneous assumption underlying those comments, that &ldquo;choosing to have a child is purely an individual act&rdquo; and not &ldquo;a contribution to society as a whole.&rdquo;
<div>Their response to Blades&rsquo;s response was&mdash;what else?&mdash;more of the same. A &ldquo;chunk of the replies&rdquo; objected &ldquo;to contributing to the wellbeing of children&rdquo; because they did not want to &ldquo;reward or encourage&rdquo; &ldquo;indiscriminate breeders.&rdquo;
<div>To be fair, many of the replies were supportive of Blades&rsquo;s views. Still, there were enough people using terms like breed and critters, terms normally associated with animals, to prompt Blades to write another article.
<div>This anti-natalism is not limited to liberals. A few years ago, at a dinner I attended, a conservative Christian advocated sterilizing poor women as a solution to welfare dependency. And today, leading immigration-reform groups have links to zero-population growth advocates.
<div>The divide is not between Republican and Democrats or liberals and conservatives&mdash;it&rsquo;s between those who regard children as a blessing and those who view them as, at best, a burden.
<div>While Blades is right when she says that plain selfishness accounts for some of the hostility to families with children, there is something else at work here as well. As Catholic writer Erin Manning says, the belief that growth in human population should be controlled is &ldquo;an important tenet of mainstream environmentalism.&rdquo;
<div>Environmentalists agree that &ldquo;there are too many people on the earth,&rdquo; and that repairing environmental damage requires &ldquo;aggressive measures to limit and restrict human population.&rdquo;
<div>In contrast to the Christian idea of stewardship, which &ldquo;wishes to conserve and protect the natural resources of the planet for the sake of future generations,&rdquo; this viewpoint &ldquo;wishes to eliminate future generations for the sake of the planet.&rdquo;
<div>This is only one example of the cultural message today driven home to Americans: that is, that large, or even medium-sized, families are an impediment to the good life. Even if the kids are not yours, their existence will have a negative impact on you&mdash;whether it&rsquo;s higher taxes or global warming.
<div>Blades was rightly disturbed by the sentiments expressed, but she should not have been surprised&mdash;not in a culture where being a &ldquo;nature lover&rdquo; and a &ldquo;mom&rdquo; is viewed as a contradiction in terms.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5105</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5105</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="Verdana14Bold">The Numbers on Moral Decline</span><br />
<span class="red10bold">By Brent Bozell III</span><br />
<span class="Verdana9Blue">Friday, March 9, 2007</span><br />
<div>Most American parents display an optimism about their children living in a richer, more technologically advanced world and as they grow, that they'll be healthier with a longer life expectancy. All that said, there's also a remarkable pessimism about the moral decline they are bequeathing to the next generation.
<div>A new cultural-values survey of 2,000 American adults performed by the polling firm of Fabrizio, McLaughlin &amp; Associates for the Culture and Media Institute reveals a strong majority, 74 percent, believes moral values in America are weaker than they were 20 years ago. Almost half, 48 percent, agree that values are <em>much</em> weaker than they were 20 years ago.
<div>Why the pessimism? Is the answer right in front of them, in their own children, or their children's friends? Or is the answer more indirect, gleaned from staring at the popular culture? For most, a leading indicator of moral decline is the media. Clearly, Americans look into their television sets and get a high-definition dose of Hollywood's take on values. Sixty-eight percent of Americans in the survey said the media are having a detrimental effect on moral values in America.
<div>Americans place heavier blame on the entertainment media, but they blame the news media as well, with its emphasis on sex, violence and ditzy head-shaving celebrities. Why do even supposedly serious news outlets devote hours of airtime to airheads like Paris Hilton, whose ticket to fame was her old-wealth surname and her talent on &quot;private&quot; sex tapes?
<div>The agreement is remarkable across political and religious subsets. Not only do 73 percent believe the entertainment media has a negative effect on America's commitment to moral values, that's a sentiment shared by Republicans (86 percent) and Democrats (68 percent); conservatives (80 percent) and liberals (64 percent); even religious types identified as orthodox (82 percent) and mostly secular progressives (62 percent).
<div>Many worry every time a popular show like NBC's &quot;Heroes&quot; threatens to show a mutilated corpse or someone getting the top of their skull sawed off. Many are saddened by grotesque Comedy Central attempts to mock God in 735 creative ways. On the new series by &quot;comedienne&quot; Sarah Silverman, the audience was treated to Silverman having a one-night stand with God. When she wakes up the next morning disgusted with the deity, she tells him she has to help a friend move, and ultimately knees him in the groin when he tries to extend the relationship. People ask: What have we done to deserve gratuitous programming like this?
<div>The media are a major influence on shaping our cultural values, and America knows it. Almost two-thirds of the people surveyed (64 percent) agree the media are an important factor in the culture. It sometimes seems almost impossibly pervasive and immune to complaints as they cross every new frontier of excess.
<div>But they're reasonable in knowing that the media is ultimately not the most important factor. Good parents can be a much more direct moral influence than the TV, multiplex or radio. Of those who were asked who is most responsible for moral decline among young people, 57 percent blamed parents and families first, and only 21 percent blamed the media first. Parents need to be a gatekeeper to children's entertainment, to guide them through its treacherous passages and not merely let them hitchhike along the road alone.
<div>Parents also need to go beyond teaching morality to living morally. Sadly, this cultural survey shows that while Americans have a great consensus on the importance of classic virtues like truthfulness, thrift, industry and charity, they often fail to follow through. America is becoming more situational in its everyday ethics. One-fourth or one-third of survey recipients admitted they would cheat on restaurant checks, tax returns and would break laws they considered outdated or if no one got hurt.
<div>America needs a people who do not merely talk about public virtues, but embrace them with passion and humility. Reversing America's moral decline isn't just about the media. It's a daily fight in millions of homes and in billions of daily ethical situations. How much progress could we make by just trying harder to live the virtues so many of us profess to hold dear?<br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5104</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5104</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Thousands of <span id="lw_1173531761_33" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">North Carolina</span> Citizens Rally for Marriage at State Legislature</strong><a rel="nofollow" name="5"></a><br />
<br />
<div>RALEIGH, March 8, 2007 (<span id="lw_1173531761_34" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">LifeSiteNews.com</span>) - Thousands of citizens rallied outside the legislature in Raleigh Tuesday to call for lawmakers to allow a vote on the state marriage amendment. Observers familiar with similar events said this was the largest crowd they had ever seen on the Halifax Mall behind the Legislative Building. <br />
<br />
Bills similar to the 2007 Senate version of the bill, SB13-Defense of Marriage, have been introduced each of the last three years, in both the House and Senate, but have been referred to a committee and have never come up for consideration in either body. A similar bill, HB493-Defense of Marriage, was introduced in the House Tuesday and at least 62 members of the House have signed on as co-sponsors-more than a majority in the 120-member House. <br />
<br />
If either bill passes both the House and Senate, it would set up a referendum for the people of <span id="lw_1173531761_35" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">North Carolina</span> to vote on the amendment to our state constitution. The date for that referendum would be November 6, 2007, in conjunction with municipal elections.<br />
<br />
For more information see the <span id="lw_1173531761_36" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">North Carolina</span> Family Policy Council<br />
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ncfpc.org/index.html"><font color="#003399">http://www.ncfpc.org/index.html</font></a></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5103</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5103</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h2>Illinois Professor Refuses to Issue Grade to Christian Student</h2>
<div class="author"></div>
<div>
<div><em></em>
<div class="text">
<div>Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) intervened after a professor at Southern Illinois University refused to grade the paper of a Christian student.</div>
<div>Christine Mize, a social work graduate student, had to create an eight-week therapy program based on a topic of her choice.</div>
<div>She chose to create a therapy model for women who suffer from post-abortion syndrome and told her professor, Laura Drueth Zeman, that the recovery portion would be faith-based.  Drueth Zeman told Mize that she would downgrade the paper if it included a faith-based element.  </div>
<div>Mize handed in her paper without the contested section, but also provided the professor with legal information to avoid any such misunderstandings in the future.</div>
<div>Amy Smith, litigation counsel for ADF, said Drueth Zeman has had the paper since December and has refused to issue a grade -- leaving Mize, a 4.0 student, with an incomplete in a class required for graduation.</div>
<div>&quot;The professor's actions are neither constitutional nor fitting for a venue universally known as the marketplace of ideas,&quot; Smith said. &quot;Christian students do not forsake their constitutional rights to express their faith-based views the minute they step on a university campus.&quot;</div>
<div><br />
FOR MORE INFORMATION<br />
You can read ADF's letter to <a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/MizeLetter.pdf">Southern Illinois University online</a>.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5102</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5102</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>   </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h2>Bill Offering Families Tax Relief Introduced</h2>
<div class="author">from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>Bill aims to encourage more parents to stay home with children.</em>
<div class="text">
<div>Families could receive some much-needed tax relief under a bill introduced in the U.S. House and Senate today.</div>
<div>The Parents' Tax Relief Act would make permanent the $1,000 child tax credit, which is set to expire in 2010. The bill would also eliminate the marriage-penalty tax, offer a dependent-care tax credit to stay-at-home parents, and extend $2,500 in tax breaks to home-based businesses. And it promises to protect parents&rsquo; Social Security by allowing up to 10 years of flexible employment credits for those who stay home to raise their children, age 6 and under.</div>
<div>The bill is sponsored by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., in the Senate and Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., in the House.  </div>
<div>&ldquo;It looks at how do we keep the family unit together,&rdquo; Terry said.</div>
<div>Tom McClusky, vice president for government affairs with the Family Research Council, said the bill would enable more moms or dads to stay home with their kids. </div>
<div>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s good to finally see that the role that parents play in raising children is recognized,&rdquo; he told Family News in Focus.</div>
<div>Coree Stewart, a stay-at-home mom in Colorado, runs a CD-duplication business in her basement. It allows her to be home with her two young daughters, while supplementing her husband&rsquo;s income.</div>
<div>&ldquo;I know the $2,500 tax credit could really enable me, as a home-based business, to put more money into my business,&rdquo; she said, &quot;and into our family.&rdquo;</div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5101</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5101</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">'God' Sidelined, 'Liberty' Missing, From New Dollar Coins</font></strong></div>
<div><strong><font size="4">Susan Jones</font></strong></div>
</div>
<div>(CNSNews.com) - &quot;In God We Trust&quot; is the national motto, but you may need a magnifying glass to find it inscribed on the edge of those new one-dollar coins.<br />
<br />
The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm, is urging Americans to avoid using the coins altogether.<br />
<br />
&quot;It is astounding that Congress has effectively done what atheist litigants have been unsuccessfully trying to do for years -- erase all reference to God from our money,&quot; said Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Law Center.<br />
<br />
&quot;This is just another step on the road to a secular society where all religious symbols are removed from public view.&quot;<br />
<br />
The Law Center wants Congress to repeal the law under which the new coins are being minted.<br />
<br />
The Presidential $1 Coin Act, enacted in 2005, requires the government to issue $1 circulating coins featuring the images of presidents. That law requires the United States Mint to place &quot;In God We Trust&quot; and &quot;E Pluribus Unum&quot; on the edge, rather than the face, of the coins.<br />
<br />
But placed on the coin's edge, &quot;In God We Trust&quot; appears to be nothing more than scratches, the Thomas More Law Center said.<br />
<br />
Also missing from the new coin is the word &quot;Liberty,&quot; which appears on all other U.S. coins.<br />
<br />
According to the U.S. Treasury, the motto &quot;In God We Trust&quot; was placed on U.S. coins because of increased religious sentiment during the Civil War. Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase received &quot;many appeals from devout persons throughout the country,&quot; urging that the United States recognize God on its coins. <br />
<br />
&quot;In God We Trust&quot; first appeared on the two-cent coin in 1864, and since 1938, all United States coins have borne the inscription on their faces.<br />
<br />
The phrase &quot;In God We Trust&quot; was declared the national motto by an Act of Congress in 1956 and first appeared on paper currency in 1957.<br />
<br />
In a related story, the U.S. Mint announced on Wednesday that an unknown number of the new $1 coins are missing the words &quot;In God We Trust&quot; altogether -- a mistake, the Mint said.<br />
<br />
&quot;The United States Mint understands the importance of the inscriptions 'In God We Trust' and 'E Pluribus Unum' as well as the mint mark and year on U.S. coinage. We take this matter seriously,&quot; the Mint said in a statement.<br />
<br />
The first batch of $1 coins released last month feature the image of George Washington. Coins with images of Adams, Jefferson, and Madison also will be issued in 2007. Four presidents will be featured on the coins every year thereafter.<br />
<br />
The Thomas More Law Center describes itself as an organization that defends and promotes the religious freedom of Christians, family values, and the sanctity of human life through education, litigation, and related activities.<br />
<br />
__See also:<br />
__'In God We Trust:' Our Money's Message for 141 Years (Nov. 16, 2005)__<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</div>
<div><strong>Find this article at: </strong>http://www.crosswalk.com/news/11531245/<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5100</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=5100</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="title"><strong>Dobson, Others Seek Ouster of NAE Vice President</strong></div>
<div class="deck">Interim president Leith Anderson says he supports Richard Cizik's work on creation care.</div>
<div class="byline"><strong>Adelle M. Banks, Religion News Service</strong><span class="text2"> | </span>posted 3/02/2007 04:02PM</div>
<br />
<div id="body">
<div class="text">More than two dozen evangelical leaders are seeking the ouster of the Rev. Richard Cizik from the <a class="text" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nae.net/">National Association of Evangelicals</a> because of his &quot;relentless campaign&quot; against global warming.</div>
<div align="right"></div>
<div class="text">In a March 1 <a class="text" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/pdfs/NAELetterFinal.pdf">letter</a> to L. Roy Taylor, chairman of the NAE Board, Focus on the Family Chairman James Dobson and others said the NAE vice president's activism on global warming is &quot;a threat to the unity and integrity&quot; of the organization.</div>
<div class="text">&quot;The issue that is dividing and demoralizing the NAE and its leaders is related to global warming,&quot; wrote the leaders, none of whom are members of the association. &quot;If he cannot be trusted to articulate the views of American evangelicals on environmental issues, then we respectfully suggest that he be encouraged to resign his position with the NAE.&quot;</div>
<div class="text">Taylor could not be reached immediately for comment. Cizik said, &quot;I have no intention of resigning.&quot; The NAE's interim president, Leith Anderson, said Friday he expects the board to stand by Cizik, who directs the NAE's Washington office.</div>
<div class="text">&quot;I'm supportive of Rich Cizik,&quot; Anderson said. &quot;I think that he is highly respected in Washington and is a forthright spokesman for creation care and that's good.&quot;</div>
<div class="text">When read a list of the signatories, Anderson said, &quot;We would normally look to our own constituency &hellip; and not to those who have chosen not to be members of the NAE &hellip; for counsel.&quot;</div>
<div class="text">The letter comes as some leading conservative Christians have been vocal in their criticisms and doubts about global warming, arguing against leading scientists who say global warming is human-induced, and saying the issue is not an appropriate focus for evangelicals.</div>
<div class="text">&quot;I am today raising a flag of opposition to this alarmism about global warming and urging all believers to refuse to be duped by these 'earthism' worshippers,&quot; the Rev. <a class="text" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.falwell.com/global_warming.php">Jerry Falwell</a> said in a Feb. 25 sermon on &quot;The Myth of Global Warming&quot; at his Lynchburg, Va., church.</div>
<div class="text">Earlier in February, <a class="text" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldmag.com/articles/12624"><em>World</em></a> magazine founder Joel Belz wrote in an essay in his conservative Christian weekly that &quot;Cizik has made it way too easy for the public to conclude that his own views are also the views of the NAE.&quot;</div>
<div class="text">Cizik said he is addressing issues included in the NAE's <a class="text" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nae.net/index.cfm?FUSEACTION=editor.page&amp;pageID=142&amp;idCategory=9">vision statement</a>, including support of the traditional family, sanctity of human life, religious freedom and care for creation.</div>
<div class="text">Cizik considers his attention to the environment to be part of a &quot;biblical mandate&quot; he follows as a Christian and NAE staffer, but said the association has not reached a consensus on global warming.</div>
<div class="text">&quot;There are people who, because of my views on climate change, which are very mainstream, want to pin a label of being a political liberal on me, which, of course, is not true,&quot; he said.</div>
<div class="text">The letter's signers, who included American Family Association Chairman Don Wildmon and Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, charged that Cizik has a &quot;preoccupation&quot; with climate concerns. Referring to a January <a class="text" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2007-01-22-evangelicals-usat_x.htm"><em>USA Today</em></a> article on evangelical identity, they said, &quot;We believe that some of that misunderstanding about evangelicalism and its 'conservative views on politics, economics, and biblical morality' can be laid at Richard Cizik's door.&quot;</div>
<div class="copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007 Christianity Today. <a class="copyright" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/help/info.html#permission">Click</a> for reprint information.</div>
<br />
<br />
<span><a class="text" id="related" rel="nofollow" name="related"></a></span><span class="subhead">Related Elsewhere:</span><br />
<div class="text">Focus on the Family sent out its call for the NAE to restrain Cizik as a <a class="text" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/clspecialalert/A000004040.cfm">special alert</a>. The <a class="text" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/pdfs/NAELetterFinal.pdf">letter</a> from Dobson and others is available at the Focus website.</div>
<div class="text"><em>Christianity Today</em>'s earlier coverage of <a class="text" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/special/globalwarming.html">global warming</a> includes news </div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4956</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4956</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font color="#800000" size="5">Will Miracle Baby Change the Abortion Debate?</font></strong> <br />
<font color="#000000" size="3"><strong>Preemie Amillia's survival may force America to rethink those Supreme Court trimesters, if the media will allow the discussion.</strong></font> <br />
<br />
<font size="2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cultureandmediainstitute.org/printer/2007/20070226170553.aspx"><img align="right" border="0" alt="" /></a> <strong>By Kristen Fyfe <br />
Culture and Media Institute </strong><br />
<strong>February 26, 2007</strong> </font><br />
<br />
<font size="2"><font size="2"><font size="2">
<div><font size="3">Is &ldquo;Hurricane Amillia&rdquo; about to blow the abortion village down? Not if the media can help it.</font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">Last week tiny Amillia Taylor made her public debut. Amillia was delivered at 21 weeks and 6 days, the shortest period of time a child has been carried in utero and lived to survive. She was introduced to the press in anticipation of her going home after four months in the hospital.   </font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">ABC <em>World News Tonight</em> was the only broadcast news outlet to make the connection between Amillia&rsquo;s gestational age and laws governing abortion. The vast majority of the 21 broadcast stories that ran about Amillia last week merely dealt with the baby&rsquo;s homecoming. </font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">Kudos to ABC anchor Charlie Gibson for leading with Amillia on Feb. 20, 2007, and acknowledging the greater significance of the story. &ldquo;The fact that she has survived and grown to more than four pounds and is about to go home is a miracle, yes, but a miracle that may have an effect on the debate over abortion, and it may change what people think about life.&rdquo;</font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">ABC made a point of presenting both sides of the story. Reporter Dan Harris warned that &ldquo;anti-abortion activists&rdquo; would make Amillia a &ldquo;national poster child.&rdquo; He closed the story by quoting a bioethicist, Professor Arthur Caplan, &ldquo;We don&rsquo;t have new treatments. There isn&rsquo;t anything to be done differently to try and save 21-week old premature infants. And so, I think it would be wrong to just say, because this one made it, we ought to treat everyone, when we don&rsquo;t have any new treatments.&rdquo;</font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">CNN&rsquo;s <em>Anderson</em><em> Cooper, 360</em> also tackled the abortion-related issues surrounding Amillia&rsquo;s birth, but couched the discussion in terms of &ldquo;fetus viability.&rdquo; The CNN story emphasized the potential problems extremely premature babies face and the developmental hurdles that Amillia must surmount.  The same bioethicist quoted by ABC, Arthur Caplan, was given substantially more time to air his pessimistic opinion in the CNN report.</font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">When asked by anchor Kiran Chetry if Amillia&rsquo;s birth and survival would lead people to try to redefine medical standards regarding &ldquo;fetus viability,&rdquo; Caplan answered, &ldquo;I think it will. You see people out there really opposed to abortion, looking for evidence that it&rsquo;s time to make a change in any way they can restrict abortion. And I think some people will point to the survival of this baby and say, here is a 21-week-old baby, we&rsquo;ve got a line in the sand in the Roe decision that says 24 weeks, maybe that&rsquo;s too old, let&rsquo;s restrict it, let&rsquo;s take it down a couple of more weeks.&rdquo;</font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">Chetry then threw a softball question to Caplan that allowed him to expound on the many problems that prematurely born babies can face, including learning disabilities, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders, mental retardation and physical disabilities. Caplan then showed his true colors when he said, &ldquo;&hellip; it isn&rsquo;t just a question of biological life, it&rsquo;s also a question of at what price to the child.&rdquo;</font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">What price to the child? Living with disabilities is a small price to pay, considering the alternative &ndash; not living at all.</font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">In that statement, Caplan made a remarkable value judgment about life. To Caplan, the issue is the quality of life as he perceives it. What does that say about the countless children born with the problems he lists? Are their lives worth less because of their disabilities? </font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3">The contrast between the ABC and CNN stories is stark. ABC asked whether Amillia&rsquo;s birth and survival change the abortion debate and gave each side of the issue a fair airing. CNN asked the same question but spent more time talking about Amillia&rsquo;s <em>potential </em>future problems, making her survival seem more like an ominous prologue to an existence fraught with disabilities and challenges, than a miraculous gift of life. That may not have been great journalism, but CNN still did a better job than most of the media, which opted to ignore the abortion angle rather than address it. </font></div>
<div><font size="3"> </font></div>
<div><font size="3"><em>Kristen Fyfe</em><em> is senior writer for the Culture and Media Institute (<a rel="nofollow">www.cultureandmediainstitute.org</a>), a division of the Media Research Center .</em></font></div>
</font></font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4955</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4955</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Poll: Support for Abortion Dropping, More Americans Want it Illegal</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
March 5</em><em>, 2007</em><br />
</div>
<div class="text" style="COLOR: #606060"><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>A new national poll conducted last month by ABC News and the Washington Post finds that the level of support for legalized abortion is on the decline. Meanwhile, the number of people who say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases in on the rise.
<div>The media outlets conducted the poll from February 22-25 with telephone interviews with 1,082 American adults and it has a three percent margin of error.</div>
<div>The poll asked respondents: &quot;Do you think abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases or illegal in all cases?&quot;</div>
<div>Pro-life advocates say such polls are inaccurate because the question leaves it up to the respondent to determine when abortion is typically done. </div>
<div>Though many Americans may think abortion is frequently done in cases of rape or incest or to save the life of the mother, statistics from the Alan Guttmacher Institute, a Planned Parenthood affiliate that tracks abortion figures, finds less than two percent of all abortions are done for those reasons.</div>
<div>The poll found 55 percent of Americans want abortion legal in all or most cases while 43 percent want it illegal in all or most cases. </div>
<div>The support for abortion is dropping as 57 percent wanted abortion legal all or most of the time in their December 2005 poll. The new survey also showed that the percentage of Americans who want abortion legal in all cases has dropped from 20 percent in April 2005 to 16 percent today.</div>
<div>Meanwhile, more Americans are taking a pro-life view as 40 percent wanted abortion illegal in all or most cases in December 2005 and 43 percent favor that view today.</div>
<div>Factoring in the poll's bias in favor of abortion based on the inaccurate wording and it appears that Americans are evenly split on the issue of abortion.</div>
<div>Other surveys show that a majority of Americans want to prohibit abortions in all or most cases or want greater restrictions on abortions. </div>
<div>A January <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2897.html%20">CBS News poll</a> found 47 percent of Americans want to prohibit all or most abortions and 16 percent want them to be greatly restricted.</div>
<div>About 30 percent of those polled want to limit abortions to the very rare cases of rape, incest or life of the mother and another 12 percent want abortions allowed only in when the pregnancy threatens the mother's life. Another 5 percent said abortions should always be illegal.</div>
<div>Just 31 percent of the public wants to permit abortion in all cases.</div>
<div>A November Newsweek poll found the number of pro-life Americans rose 5 percent while the number of Americans who support abortion fell four percent compared to a previous poll it conducted in 2005. </div>
<div>Meanwhile, a March 2006 Zogby poll also found that Americans support limits on abortion by wide margins.</div>
<div>It showed 69 percent of voters agree with prohibiting federal taxpayer funds from being used to pay for abortions, 69 percent support parental notification for girls 16 or younger and by a 55 percent for girls 18 and younger.</div>
<div>Zogby found 56 percent of Americans back a 24-hour waiting period on abortion, 64 percent would charge criminals with a second crime for killing or injuring an unborn child in the course of an attack on a pregnant woman, and 69 percent don't want their tax money to pay for abortions or promoting abortion in other nations.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Printed from: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2961.html">http://www.lifenews.com/nat2961.html</a></em><br />
<br />
<hr />
Copyright &copy; 2003-2006 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved. For free daily/weekly pro-life news, email us </div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4954</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4954</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3 class="entry-header">'Lost Tomb of Jesus' tries to turn 'fiction into believability,' minister warns</h3>
<div class="entry" id="entry-1643">
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body">Allie Martin and Jenni Parker<br />
<small><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 27, 2007</font></small><br />
<br />
<div>Christian clergy leader and activist Rob Schenck is blasting an upcoming television special that claims archaeologists have uncovered a coffin that once contained the remains of Jesus Christ. The program titled <em>The Lost Tomb of Jesus </em>premieres March 4 on the Discovery Channel, and Schenck warns that it is full of misleading and incorrect information.</div>
</div>
<div class="entry-more" id="more">
<div>The <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.jesusfamilytomb.com/movie_overview.html">TV special</a> airing Sunday was executive-produced by Hollywood director James Cameron (<em>Titanic</em>, <em>True Lies</em>, <em>The Terminator </em>) and directed by documentary filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici (<em>The Exodus Decoded</em>, <em>James: Brother of Jesus</em>), whose work includes a number of films about controversies in Jewish history. </div>
<div>While Cameron is best known for his fictional films, his collaboration with Jacobovici is being touted as a feature documentary that makes a strong case, allegedly based on scientific analysis of ancient artifacts, for the notion that the two-millennia-old &quot;Tomb of the Ten Ossuaries&quot; actually belonged to the family of Jesus of Nazareth. </div>
<div>In the presentation, Cameron features archaeologists and supposed DNA experts discussing what is purportedly &quot;the latest historical evidence&quot; supporting the assertion that -- contrary to the biblical account of Christ's death, burial and resurrection -- Jesus was buried along with his mother Mary, Mary Magdalene (Mariamene), and a supposed son, Judah. But according to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nationalclergycouncil.org/">National Clergy Council</a> president Rob Schenck, a Hollywood director is among the people least qualified to render any determination of Biblical truth. </div>
<div>Cameron is a man &quot;whose job is to turn fiction into believability,&quot; Schenck points out. Meanwhile, he notes, &quot;The man [the well-known moviemaker] has partnered with -- Simcha Jacobovici -- has been completely discredited by the scholarly community as nothing more than a modern-day, self-proclaimed Indiana Jones.&quot;</div>
<div>Furthermore, <em>The Lost Tomb of Jesus</em>, is full of inaccuracies, the National Clergy Council spokesman asserts. The documentary claims to present scientific analysis of limestone ossuaries (bone boxes) and physical evidence found in a 2,000-year-old tomb in Talpiot, Jerusalem, that some &quot;experts&quot; claim may have once held the remains of Jesus of Nazareth and his family; but Schenck insists there is &quot;nothing here of any substance.&quot;</div>
<div>Nor is there anything remarkable about finding bone boxes inscribed with the names of Yeshua, Miriam or Mary, the Christian clergy leader asserts. This is especially the case since Yeshua was &quot;one of the most popular male names of that period,&quot; he adds, and &quot;30 percent of women were named Mary at that time.&quot; </div>
<div>And Mariamene, which some scholars believe was Mary Magdalene's original name, was &quot;as popular as Jill or Sally is today in our culture,&quot; Schenck says. Speculating about the bone boxes depicted in <em>The Lost Tomb of Jesus </em>based simply on the names they bear, the minister contends, &quot;is like finding [an artifact with the name] 'Bill Smith' and saying, 'which Bill Smith is it?' There's just nothing here.&quot;</div>
<div>Through the years, Schenck observes, Hollywood has attacked and mocked the Christian faith, and he suspects the makers of <em>The Lost Tomb of Jesus</em> may have similar intentions. However, the clergy leader notes, he tends to agree with critics who claim this new documentary makes a mockery of the archaeological profession.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4953</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4953</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><strong><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">Twelve Students Receive 10-Day Suspension for Praying Before School </font></strong></div>
<div><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">Vancouver, WA - Today twelve high school students at Heritage High School were suspended for ten days for gathering to pray before school. Liberty Counsel is providing legal assistance to the students who were suspended. </font></div>
<div><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">A few weeks ago, the students tried to start a prayer club, but the school's vice principal, Alex Otoupal, would not let them meet in a private room. The students gathered in the cafeteria before school to pray, but a Satanist student went to the school office and complained. As a result, Vice Principal Otoupal told the Christian students they could not pray in the cafeteria but would have to go outside. After the students insisted on praying in the cafeteria because of inclement weather, Otoupal suspended them for ten days.</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">Anita L. Staver, President of Liberty Counsel, commented: &quot;It is absolutely outrageous that the school allowed one Satanist student to exercise a heckler's veto over the other students' speech. This situation underscores the ignorance of school officials regarding the constitutional rights of students.&quot; </font></div>
<div><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">Staver concluded: &quot;Most of the students who were suspended are immigrants from Russia. We must show them that America is still the land of the free. School officials must immediately reverse the suspensions.&quot;</font></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4952</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4952</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Tennessee Woman Chooses Child&rsquo;s Life over Her Own</strong><a rel="nofollow" name="1"></a><br />
Told she would die from soccer ball-sized ovarian tumour if she did not abort baby<br />
<br />
<div>By Hilary White<br />
<br />
<span id="lw_1172925980_10" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">NASHVILLE</span>, March 2, 2007 (<span id="lw_1172925980_11" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">LifeSiteNews.com</span>) &ndash; On Thursday, February 15, at the age of <span id="lw_1172925980_12" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">31, Jennifer Ann Carlisle</span> gave up her life to cancer after refusing an abortion that doctors told her might have extended her life. <br />
<br />
Jennifer had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2005. At two months gestation, long before any chance of saving the child&rsquo;s life outside the womb, Jennifer was told that she would die from the soccer ball-sized tumour if she did not abort the baby.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Even though the doctors did say it would extend her life to have the abortion, she and her husband made the decision to let God choose,&quot; said Carol Day, Jennifer's mother.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;They decided God would make that decision, not her,&rdquo; Jennifer&rsquo;s aunt, Jackie Murdock, told the Niles Daily Star. &ldquo;She wouldn't decide somebody else's life.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Murdock recalled her niece saying, &ldquo;Whether she lives or dies she will not abort her baby.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
Gabriel Carlisle was born in January 2006 and Jennifer underwent aggressive chemotherapy but after a brief summer remission, her condition worsened. She attended church services Sunday February 11, and died the following week.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;I told her that I loved her,&quot; Joshua said, recalling when his wife died in his arms surrounded by family. &quot;And I told her that she needed to go on, that God was calling her home.&rdquo; They had been married ten years. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;I held her and she took her last breath. There was a peace at that last minute that's just indescribable,&rdquo; Joshua told Nashville&rsquo;s TV News Channel 5.<br />
<br />
The Carlisles&rsquo; church and community are rallying to assist the family. A benefit auction and concert to help pay for medical expenses were held at Christ Community Church in Franklin Tennessee.<br />
<br />
Joshua told local news media, &ldquo;I&rsquo;m hoping that we don't get any more doctor bills but they're still coming in.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;I guess she knew the secret of life and it is not in receiving but giving,&rdquo; Joshua said.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4950</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4950</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="Verdana14Bold"><strong>Taking God Out Of School Leaves A Vacuum Something Will Replace</strong> </span><br />
<span class="red10bold">By Michael Johnson</span><br />
<span class="Verdana9Blue">Wednesday, February 28, 2007</span><br />
<div>Here&rsquo;s a little test of your sensitivity to the current culture:
<div>Suppose your child&rsquo;s school announces a Christmas celebration &ndash; and your child, while subscribing to your atheistic beliefs, decides to participate. So he goes, dressed as Santa Claus.
<div>Uh-uh, say school officials. This is <em>Christ</em>mas. Take off the red suit, and come back when you can wear something shepherd-y.
<div>Care to guess how fast the American Civil Liberties Union could whip up a lawsuit on that one?
<div>How, then, to explain their silence in the case of a 10-year-old student at Willow Hill Elementary in Philadelphia?
<div>The fourth-grader, like many Christians, faces a quandary about Halloween. On the one hand, parties and candy are nice; on the other, all that focus on blood and witchery and horror stuff seems like a rather unhealthy infatuation with the darkest elements of the human soul. Especially for one who is trying to follow the Light.
<div>But the Abington School District doesn&rsquo;t make much allowance for that dichotomy of conscience. It mandates that every student will wear a costume, or be isolated from the rest of the student body during the school&rsquo;s Halloween activities.
<div>While the young Christian didn&rsquo;t particularly buy into the &ldquo;come-as-your-favorite-ghoul&rdquo; aspect of the day, neither did he relish the idea of spending an afternoon sequestered. So, he decided to attend the party dressed as Jesus Christ (who knew a little something about the conflicts between faith and culture).
<div>It seemed an ideal solution. Costumed as Christ, the boy fulfilled the district&rsquo;s dress requirements, while making a kind of personal statement about his views on the holiday itself.
<div>But the idea went over like a vampire at a blood bank. The boy&rsquo;s principal decreed that his costume violated the school&rsquo;s unwritten religion policy, and that he should exchange his outfit for something more seemly.
<div>Like what?
<div>Like, maybe a Roman emperor, a teacher said.
<div>Good thing the boy didn&rsquo;t come dressed as a rabbi. The teacher might have suggested Yaser Arafat.
<div>Naturally, the school didn&rsquo;t have a problem with other costumes, some of which carried their own religious implications. The devils&rsquo; and witches&rsquo; outfits were okay. The kid dressed as &ldquo;Death&rdquo; was a hoot.
<div>But Jesus? The school couldn&rsquo;t take that risk.
<div>To be fair, Abington has its reputation to think of. It&rsquo;s the same district that made headlines half a century ago in a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that declared school-sponsored devotional Bible reading in public schools to be unconstitutional.
<div>As a character or an object of reverence, Jesus clearly isn&rsquo;t welcome in Abington schools. Nor are those who take Him seriously. The question is: why?
<div>What is it about the Christian faith that so unnerves our public officials and private atheists? Not believing is one thing &ndash; persecuting those who do is something else. Did school authorities really believe that this child&rsquo;s peers, seeing him dressed as Jesus, would fall to their knees and convert on the spot? That they&rsquo;d go home and ask their parents questions? Did they think the boy would grab a mike and start preaching, or try to turn pumpkins into wine?
<div>Really, the nature of their panic is hard to fathom. After all, Jesus&rsquo; teachings are not only important to those who consider Him the Son of God; they are the basis for countless tenets of polite behavior. Why we wouldn&rsquo;t want our children learning to turn the other cheek, go the second mile, reach out in mercy to those who are lonely or impoverished or hurting? Would it be so awful if they strove to emulate His integrity, His selflessness, His love?
<div>Oh, it&rsquo;s a scary thought all right. Better to let our kids watch cinematic bloodbaths, and joke about serial killers and satanic rites and bewitching vengeances. These are the ideals that inspire depth of character. These are what we want to parade before our children, and celebrate with publicly-funded school festivities.
<div>Interesting, all the effort our government and courts expend, frantically trying to keep our kids away from a God Who is &ndash; by definition &ndash; everywhere, all the time. Maybe we think that by systematically removing every element of faith from our society, we&rsquo;re gradually evolving a more broad-minded generation.
<div>But, in fact, we&rsquo;re not. All we&rsquo;re really doing is &hellip; creating a monster. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4949</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4949</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="Verdana14Bold"><strong>Planned Parenthood: Dialing for death</strong></span><br />
<span class="red10bold">By Matt Barber</span><br />
<span class="Verdana9Blue">Friday, March 2, 2007</span><br />
<div>Although it&rsquo;s a sound concept in terms of fundraising techniques, Planned Parenthood&rsquo;s latest scheme to profit off the backs of young, impressionable women by sacrificing their children to the god of convenience reminds us once again that it&rsquo;s not so much about a woman&rsquo;s sacred &ldquo;right to choose&rdquo; as it is about the abortion industry&rsquo;s unholy &ldquo;rite to schmooze.&rdquo;
<div>In a recent press release, Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) announced that it would be &ldquo;giving customers the power to make a difference with every [cell phone] call they make.&rdquo; Tragically, however, when Planned Parenthood talks about making a difference, we know it&rsquo;s the difference between life and death.
<div>In what it bills as &ldquo;a unique wireless [cell phone] program that enables consumers to choose where their mobile phone dollars go without sacrificing quality service,&rdquo; the abortion Goliath &ndash; already enjoying an annual budget of nearly one billion dollars &ndash; boasts that the plan &ldquo;will provide an impressive 10% of revenues generated directly to PPFA, transforming a simple phone call into a personal act of support.&rdquo;
<div>The abortion provider innocuously calls the fundraising effort &ldquo;Planned Parenthood Wireless.&rdquo; The cheerful tone of the press release is uncanny. Read between the lines, and it shamelessly chirps: &ldquo;you make a call, we kill a baby.&rdquo; And in light of the many acts of abortion violence Planned Parenthood commits each year, &ldquo;Dialing for Death&rdquo; is a more fitting banner.
<div>But the latest 411 on Planned Parenthood&rsquo;s money lust only underscores the fact that the organization already benefits tremendously from a government mandated, taxpayer boondoggle.
<div>Addressing Planned Parenthood&rsquo;s new venture into telecommunications, Wendy Wright, President of Concerned Women for America, said, &ldquo;Planned Parenthood constantly demands more tax dollars, even though they already make money from charging for their services, corporate grants, aggressive mailings, fundraisers and other revenue streams. This newest marketing ploy provides evidence that Planned Parenthood is capable of making lots of money, and taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize Planned Parenthood and their hefty salaries,&rdquo; said Wright.
<div>But somehow, Planned Parenthood&rsquo;s latest fundraising ploy just seems to smack of tasteless arrogance. It&rsquo;s not that the concept is illegitimate, but rather that the dark nature of the organization employing the concept makes it creepy and unseemly.
<div>And the fact that &ldquo;Planned Parenthood Wireless&rdquo; offers a &ldquo;family plan&rdquo; drips with morbid irony. In view of the group&rsquo;s twisted interpretation of &ldquo;family&rdquo; and the millions of lives it snuffs out each year (fueled by that phantom &ldquo;right&rdquo; to unfettered abortion on demand), this plan will apparently have no need for roll over minutes, and every dropped-call will amount to a precious life spared. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4948</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4948</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="Verdana14Bold"><strong>God Save The United States and This Honorable Court</strong> </span><br />
<span class="red10bold">By Jay Sekulow</span><br />
<span class="Verdana9Blue">Friday, March 2, 2007</span><br />
<div>Earlier this week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case brought by the Freedom From Religion Foundation. The Supreme Court has an important opportunity to put an end to federal taxpayer lawsuits by church-state separationists that is long overdue. The a focuses on a challenge of using taxpayer dollars to fund a program of President Bush&rsquo;s faith-based initiative. At the ACLJ, we filed a brief with the high court in support of the federal government&rsquo;s position.
<div>There is no constitutional conflict in using taxpayer dollars to fund faith-based initiatives. This is a position we&rsquo;ve advocated for years. The Supreme Court should leave the faith-based initiative alone and focus instead on removing the special privileges that are afforded to atheists and others who are antagonistic to religion. These church-state separationists have been given a free pass in federal court to bring Establishment Clause lawsuits simply because something is taking place that they don&rsquo;t like. They have not had to show that a law or government activity actually injured them in any way before they could challenge it in federal court. All they had to do was show that they were taxpayers somewhere. That is not only unfair, but wrong. In no other area of the law are plaintiffs given a free pass to federal court simply because they are taxpayers. This Religion Clause exception to the traditional rules of legal standing should be put to an end. I am hopeful that the Supreme Court will put an end to this special treatment given to groups like the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
<div>In the Freedom From Religion Foundation case, the separationist taxpayers challenged the federal faith-based initiatives program involving conferences that took place throughout the United States. The federal district court in Wisconsin dismissed the case, ruling that the Freedom From Religion Foundation had no &ldquo;standing&rdquo; &ndash; capacity to sue &ndash; because there was no federal grant at issue. Unfortunately, a federal appeals court reinstated the lawsuit ruling that the separationists had standing to challenge the use of federal funds to run the challenged program. The federal government appealed to the Supreme Court.
<div>In our friend-of-the-court brief in support of the federal government, we pointed out that no federal taxpayer suits are allowed in any other context aside from Establishment Clause suits challenging federal spending. That exception rests on the 1968 decision in Flast v. Cohen. Subsequent to Flast, however, the Supreme Court has refused to expand Flast and has rejected every argument that the Court has made in the Flast decision.
<div>All that was at issue here was federal funding going to conferences that encourage faith-based organizations to participate in meeting community needs. This should not constitute a constitutional crisis. Nor should this case be used as a test case on how taxpayer funds are spent. Instead, the high court needs to bring an end to the special treatment given to atheists and other separationists in these lawsuits. The Flast precedent has created an uneven playing field because it empowered every disgruntled atheist to make a federal case out of any hint of religion in government action. This is simply wrong.
<div>It appeared that Justice Kennedy understood the significance of the impact of this case. He noted that the Supreme Court of the United States starts each session with the phrase, &ldquo;God Save The United States and This Honorable Court.&rdquo; The statement is made by a Court Marshall, who is a federal employee. Justice Kennedy duly noted that if the proportion of the salary of this federal employee could be determined so that an allocation could be made which shows that federal tax dollars are being used to promote the phrase, &ldquo;God Save The United States and This Honorable Court,&rdquo; then, under the Plaintiff&rsquo;s theory, anybody in the United States could bring a lawsuit challenging this time-honored practice. Justice Kennedy is right. These standing rules have created a field day for separationists who want to remove all vestiges of religion from America&rsquo;s public life. The Court has an opportunity to end this abuse of the federal court system. I am hopeful that the Court will hold that there is no standing present, and that God will continue to save the United States and the Honorable Court so that it can address real issues of constitutional significance. <br />
<br />
<em>
<div><font size="2"><em>Jay Alan Sekulow is Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.townhall.com/TalkRadio/Show.aspx?RadioShowID=8">Listen to his radio show, Jay Sekulow Live, on Townhall here.</a> Learn more about the ACLJ at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aclj.org/">www.ACLJ.org</a></em></font>
<div><font size="2">Be the first to read Jay Sekulow's column. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.townhall.com/Secure/Signup.aspx">Sign up today</a> and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.townhall.com/Secure/Signup.aspx">Sign up today!</a></font></div>
</div>
</em> <br />
<br />
Copyright &copy; 2006 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4947</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4947</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h2>Dr. James C. Dobson, evangelical leaders challenge global warming rhetoric</h2>
<div class="author"></div>
<div>
<div><em>Letter urges National Association of Evangelicals to restrain its DC spokesman.</em>
<div class="text">
<div><a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/pdfs/NAELetterFinal.pdf">In a letter</a> to the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), Dr. James C. Dobson, Ph.D., chairman of Focus on the Family Action, joined other pro-family leaders in urging the NAE to refrain from taking a position on the controversial and divisive topic of global warming.</div>
<div>NAE official Rich Cizik, who works in the group&rsquo;s Washington, D.C., office, has told the media it&rsquo;s indisputable that human activity has contributed to global warming. He&rsquo;s also said that evangelicals &ldquo;must confront population control.&rdquo;</div>
<div>&ldquo;We ask,&rdquo; Dobson and the other pro-family leaders wrote, &ldquo;how is population control going to be achieve if not by promoting abortion, the distribution of condoms to the young, and, even by infanticide in China and elsewhere? Is this where Richard Cizik would lead us?&rdquo;</div>
<div>You&rsquo;ll find within the letter <a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.interfaithstewardship.org/pdf/OpenLetter.pdf">a link</a> to an open letter that challenges common assumptions about global warming.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4946</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4946</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="productDetails">
<h2>Frugality Opens Doors to Giving, Enjoying God's Blessings</h2>
<h3>Deborah Smith Pegues</h3>
</div>
<div class="articleContent">
<div><font size="2"><em>&quot;Now gather the leftovers,&quot; Jesus told his disciples, &quot;so that nothing is wasted.&quot;<br />
<br />
</em>Jesus set a great example for frugality. Even though He had performed a miracle and fed a crowd of 5,000 men and an undisclosed number of women and children with only five loaves and two small fishes, He instructed His disciples to gather up the leftovers. When it was all said and done, they had gathered 12 basketfuls. <em>Now, Jesus,</em> you may wonder, <em>was that necessary? You could have thrown that extra bread away. All you had to do was perform another miracle and make more bread when You needed it.</em> Through His actions, Jesus was showing the importance of not squandering what God has provided&mdash;even when it appears that you do not need the excess.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">I talked to a couple recently who had lived a rather lavish lifestyle, but through a series of misfortunes lost everything. They are starting to rebuild their lives and are working at jobs that pay much less than they were used to making. I queried them about the role they had played in their financial decline, and they confessed that they were partly responsible. I concluded from a casual observation of their current behavior that a lot of their old wasteful habits were still alive and well. They called it &quot;generosity&quot; when they gave a 95 percent tip to the restaurant&rsquo;s parking attendant. By no means am I opposed to such bigheartedness, but when you are trying to stabilize your finances, you need to understand that frugality is a significant part of spirituality and God is not pleased when we engage in extravagance.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">In one of His parables, Jesus talked about a son who convinced his father to give him his inheritance before the appointed time. &quot;A few days later this younger son packed all his belongings and took a trip to a land, and there he wasted all his money on wild living&quot;(Luke 15:13 NLT). When the economy turned sour, he could only find work feeding a farmer&rsquo;s swine. He almost starved to death. At one point, he became so hungry he had to eat the pods that the farmer fed to the swine. I can imagine him sitting there by the trough dividing the food between himself and the pigs: &quot;swine,&quot; &quot;mine,&quot; &quot;swine,&quot; &quot;mine.&quot; He then realized that his father&rsquo;s servants were living better than this. He humbled himself and headed home. His merciful father was glad to receive him and gave him a big welcome back party. Of course, by having the party, the father was by no means condoning his son&rsquo;s wastefulness, but rather celebrating his coming to his senses.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Are you wasteful in any area of your life, or do you actively seek ways to practice frugality? For instance, do you allow your children to open a can of soda, take a few sips, and then trash it? Did you know that there are special lids available at the supermarket that will allow you to seal the can and preserve the fizz? Are you too embarrassed to ask for a doggie bag when you eat out? Do you bring home leftovers from your restaurant dining and then allow them to spoil in the refrigerator before you can consume them? Do you consider reusing plastic lunch bags, especially when you only use them for dry goods such as chips and cookies? They can be recycled at least once after a quick swipe with a damp towel. Do you always turn the lights off when you leave the room? Do you use both sides of the paper when printing drafts of reports&mdash;at home and at work?</font></div>
<div><font size="2">I have practiced frugality as far back as I can remember. In fact, Darnell teases that I squeeze each dollar so tightly it&rsquo;s a wonder I don&rsquo;t rub George Washington&rsquo;s face right off the front of it. Yes, I turn the bottle upside down and get the last drop out of everything. I pick up every penny I find when I&rsquo;m out walking. As Benjamin Franklin said, &quot;A penny saved is a penny earned.&quot; I use vinegar and water instead of the fancy cleaners to clean glass and shiny surfaces. I do everything I can to save money&mdash;not to hoard it, but so that I can share it. I can&rsquo;t think of a single thing I have ever purchased that has brought more joy than writing a check to someone who desperately needs it. We are never more like Christ than when we are giving.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">I want to be careful to balance our discussion by warning that we should not allow our desire to be frugal to keep us from fully enjoying the things that are within the bounds of what God allows. I thoroughly enjoy the breathtaking view of the city from my home. My husband and I have made great sacrifices in putting the needs of God&rsquo;s house before our own desires. Therefore, we refuse to allow Satan to make us feel guilty about what God has provided.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Frugality is not a call to poverty, and it certainly should not take the fun out of our lives. It is important that we enjoy the abundant life that Christ came to give us. It is equally important to understand that abundance is not to be equated with extravagance. God blesses His children with abundance so that they can bless others with their overflow. If we are all poverty-stricken, how will we have an overflow?</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Frugality is simply avoiding waste. Wastefulness will keep your finances in a tailspin. Frugality is evidence that God can trust you with increased resources because you have learned how to manage what He already supplied.<br />
<br />
Taken from <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianbook.com/Christian/Books/product?item_no=918361&amp;netp_id=437737&amp;event=ESRCN&amp;item_code=WW">30 Days to Taming Your Finances</a> by Deborah Smith Pegues; Copyright 2006 by Deborah Smith Pegues; Published by Harvest House Publishers, Eugene, OR; Used by Permission.<br />
<br />
</font></div>
<hr />
<font size="2"><strong>Deborah Smith Pegues</strong> is an experienced certified public accountant, a Bible teacher, a speaker, a certified behavioral consultant specializing in understanding personality temperaments, and the author of <em>30 Days to Taming Your Tongue</em>. She and her husband, Darnell, have been married for more than 27 years and make their home in California.<br />
</font></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4945</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4945</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font face="Palatino," color="#000000" size="+2">Plowshares beaten into swords in Gaza</font><br />
<font face="Palatino," color="#000000" size="+1">Palestinians: 'Looting and burning' of Jewish holy sites 'was a great joy'</font><br />
<font face="Palatino,"><font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>TEL AVIV &ndash; The ruins of two large synagogues in Gush Katif, the evacuated Jewish communities of the Gaza Strip, have been transformed into a military base used by Palestinian groups to fire rockets at Israeli cities and train for attacks against the Jewish state, according to a senior terror leader in Gaza.
<div>When Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip in August 2005, it left in tact 20 synagogues of the Gush Katif Jewish communities following an Israeli Cabinet decision against demolishing the structures.
<div>Immediately after the Israeli evacuation was completed, Palestinians mobs destroyed most of the Gaza synagogues, including two major synagogues in Neve Dekalim, the largest Gush Katif community. In front of international camera crews, the Palestinians ripped off aluminum window frames and metal ceiling fixtures from the Neve Dekalim synagogues, which were situation close to each other in the center of town. Militants flew the Palestinian and Hamas flags from the structures before mobs burned down the synagogues.
<div>Speaking to WND from Gaza, Abu Abir, spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees terrorist organization, said the area where the synagogues once stood now is used to fire rockets at Israel.
<div>&quot;We are proud to turn these lands, especially these parts that were for long time the symbol of occupation and injustice, like the synagogue, into a military base and source of fire against the Zionists and the Zionist entity,&quot; Abu Abir said.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;The liberated lands of the destroyed ugly and Nazi settlements [Gush Katif] is our property, and we have the right to do whatever we feel is suitable for the struggle against the occupation and for the general interest of the Palestinian people,&quot; the Committees leader said.
<div>The Committees is a coalition of terrorist organizations operating in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank responsible for launching hundreds of rockets from Gaza aimed at nearby Jewish towns. The group is accused of bombing a U.S. convoy in Gaza in 2003 in which three American government contractors were killed.
<div>Abu Abir blamed the Palestinian desecration of the Gaza synagogues on the Jewish state, claiming the decision to leave the structures in tact was part of an Israeli conspiracy.
<div>&quot;The Zionists left these so called synagogues in order to make that one day media outlets like WorldNetDaily would raise the pathetic and rude argument about what we have done to the poor Zionists holy places. (Israel) left the synagogues behind so the world would see the Palestinians destroying them,&quot; Abu Abir said.
<div>The terrorist leader claimed the mob destruction of the synagogues was not planned but was a spontaneous outburst of &quot;happiness.&quot;
<div>&quot;The looting and burning of the synagogues was a great joy. There was no intention to desecrate them but this was part of the great joy the young men had when they destroyed everything that could remind us of the occupation. It was in an unplanned expression of happiness that these synagogues were destroyed.&quot;
<div>
<div>Prior to the Gaza withdrawal, Israel's Supreme Court ruled the Gaza synagogues should be bulldozed by the Israeli army, citing what it said was previous Palestinian desecrations of other religions' holy sites as justification for the synagogue demolitions. But then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who said he opposed the demolitions, put the decision to Cabinet vote. The Cabinet decided against destroying the structures.
<div>Israel's chief rabbinate had petitioned the Supreme Court to halt the synagogue destructions, arguing the demolitions contravene Jewish law. Rabbi Shear-Yashuv Cohen, a member of the chief rabbinate, explained to WND at the time: &quot;According to Jewish law, synagogues cannot be destroyed unless new ones are already built, and even then, the issues are complicated. Here, the former Gaza residents don't have homes yet to live in, new synagogues have not been built, so there isn't even a question.&quot;
<div>The senior rabbis also expressed fear Jews in other parts of the world may use bulldozings of the Gaza synagogues as precedent to destroy other abandoned synagogues.
<div>Upon being informed of the current status of the synagogue ruins, Dror Venunu, a former Gush Katif resident who said he prayed daily at the Neve Dekalim synagogues, told WND he was &quot;sick to his stomach.&quot;
<div>&quot;It sends pain straight to my heart and makes me sick to my stomach. In any other part of world this would be unacceptable, but where is the media? Where is the international outcry condemning use of a holy site for terrorism?&quot; commented Venunu, who is the international coordinator for the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.katifund.org/">Gush Katif Committee</a>, a major charity organization representing Gaza's former Jewish residents, most of whom are living in temporary housing units. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4932</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4932</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3 class="entry-header">New porn study prompts warnings to parents about online dangers</h3>
<div class="entry" id="entry-1607">
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body">Allie Martin<br />
<small><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 26, 2007</font></small><br />
<br />
<span class="floatimgleft"></span> 
<div>A study by University of New Hampshire researchers finds that online pornography's threat to children and teens may be more serious than previously thought. In light of the recent study, one Internet security advocate is warning parents that they must be proactive about protecting their children from Internet porn. </div>
</div>
<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"></div>
<br />
<div class="entry-more" id="more">
<div>According to the study, in a survey of Internet users from ages 10 to 17, some 42 percent said they had seen online pornography in the previous year. And out of that group, 66 percent said their exposure to the pornographic material was unintentional.</div>
<div>Neil Peterson is the director of marketing for Integrity Online, a Mississippi-based Internet filter solution provider. He says it is up to parents to be educated and vigilant about their children's Internet use.</div>
<div>&quot;As these studies find, if you have barriers set in place -- more specifically, filtering mechanisms set in place -- the likelihood of you encountering online pornography, especially by accident, is greatly reduced,&quot; Peterson says. But unfortunately, he observes, new technology has created more avenues for porn to reach children, making it tougher than ever to keep pornography out of the hands of young people.</div>
<div>&quot;It's unfortunate, but just like other industries that have a lot of funds driving them, the pornography industry is no different,&quot; the Internet security advocate says, &quot;They've really pioneered a lot of the pop-up technology and other technologies that are on the Internet because they have the funds to do so,&quot; he contends.</div>
<div>Last year, Integrity Online blocked more than 200 million pornography-laden web pages and e-mails. Peterson advises parents to use filtering software; however, he says they can do more to protect their kids.</div>
<div>&quot;The first thing we always recommend is that you do have a discussion with your children,&quot; the Integrity Online official says. &quot;That's the first thing that really nothing else will take the place of,&quot; he asserts.</div>
<div>The University of New Hampshire's recent study on pornography exposure among young people is published in the latest issue of the journal <em>Pediatrics</em>, a peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics.</div>
<br />
</div>
</div>
<br />
<div class="entry-content" align="center"><small><font size="2">All Original Content </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/policies.php#01"><font size="2">Copyright</font></a><font size="2"> 2006-2007 American Family News Network - All Rights Reserved</font></small><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4928</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4928</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Court Rules Schools Can Teach Homosexuality Without Parents Consent or Choice to Opt Out</strong><a rel="nofollow" name="4"></a><br />
Judge says good citizens must accept homosexuality in the name of &ldquo;diversity&rdquo;<br />
<br />
<div>By Meg Jalsevac<br />
<br />
<span id="lw_1172578326_24" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">BOSTON</span>, February 26, 2007 (<span id="lw_1172578326_25" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">LifeSiteNews.com</span>) &ndash; Last Friday, February 23, Federal District Judge Mark L. Wolf dismissed David Parker&rsquo;s civil rights lawsuit against the Lexington, MA school board. Along with other parents from the same school, Parker filed the lawsuit last April after they were was notified by the local school board that the school was not required to provide parental notification before introducing and teaching homosexual or transgender material in elementary school classrooms.<br />
<br />
As reported by LifeSiteNews, Parker originally confronted officials over the issue at his son&rsquo;s elementary school when homosexual material was read in the six year olds&rsquo; classroom without Parker&rsquo;s prior knowledge. <br />
<br />
Justice Wolf accepted the school board&rsquo;s motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that &ldquo;It is reasonable for public educators to teach elementary school students about individuals with different sexual orientations and about various forms of families, including those with same-sex parents, in an effort to eradicate the effects of past discrimination, to reduce the risk of future discrimination and, in the process, to reaffirm our nation's constitutional commitment to promoting mutual respect among members of our diverse society.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Wolf based his decision on the argument that the Constitution allows public schools the freedom to teach material that is &ldquo;reasonably&rdquo; geared to forming good citizens. &ldquo;In essence, under the Constitution public schools are entitled to teach anything that is reasonably related to the goals of preparing students to become engaged and productive citizens in our democracy.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
According to Wolf, good citizens must accept homosexuality in the name of diversity. He continued, &ldquo;Diversity is a hallmark of our nation. It is increasingly evident that our diversity includes differences in sexual orientation.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
In his decision, Wolf acknowledged that parents are the primary educators of their children. However, he maintained that, should parents choose to send their child to public school, &ldquo;The Constitution does not permit them to prescribe what those children will be taught.&rdquo; Instead, Wolf offered three options for parents who disapproved of the material being taught to their children in public schools &ndash; they can remove their child from the public system and instead choose a private school, they can educate their child at home or they can work to elect a school board that will uphold their beliefs.<br />
<br />
Wolf did not leave parents the option to exercise their religious freedom and remove their child from class on the days when morally objectionable material would be covered saying that this could offend other children. He said, &ldquo;An exodus from class when issues of homosexuality or same-sex marriage are to be discussed could send the message that gays, lesbians, and the children of same-sex parents are inferior and, therefore, have a damaging effect on those students.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Wolf justified his decision saying that requiring public school children to be presented with &ldquo;instruction concerning different types of families&rdquo; was essentially necessary to prepare them to &ldquo;respect differences in their personal interactions with others and in their future participation in the political process.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
<span id="lw_1172578326_26" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">MassResistance.org</span>, a Massachusetts&rsquo; pro-family website, denounced Wolf&rsquo;s decision. saying that it is largely based on precedent from a prior ruling that it argues was poorly reasoned and riddled with errors. MassResistance also questioned the justice of the options that Wolf provided to the concerned parents saying, &ldquo;Can you imagine a federal judge in the Civil Rights era telling blacks the same thing -- that if they can't be served at a lunch counter they should just start their own restaurant?&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Parker&rsquo;s attorneys say that they intend to appeal the dismissal to the Appeals Court. <br />
<br />
Lexington school board has been financially and otherwise aided in this issue by pro-homosexual groups from across the nation including American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, Massachusetts Teachers Association.<br />
<br />
Read Judge Mark Wolf's complete 38-page ruling (Adobe Acrobat format)<br />
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.massresistance.org/docs/parker_lawsuit/order_motion_to_dismiss_022307.pdf"><font color="#003399">http://www.massresistance.org/docs/parker_lawsuit/order_motion_to_dismiss_022307.pdf</font></a><br />
To respectfully contact MA legislators in David Parker&rsquo;s own region regarding this case:<br />
<br />
State Senator Robert A. Havern</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4927</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4927</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Jesus' Family Tomb Discovery is a Titanic Fraud</strong><a rel="nofollow" name="3"></a><br />
&quot;It's time the Discovery Channel discovered ethics and stopped with the sensationalism&quot;, says Donohue<br />
<br />
<div><span id="lw_1172578221_20" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">NEW YORK</span>, February 26, 2007 (<span id="lw_1172578221_21" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">LifeSiteNews.com</span>) - &quot;Titanic&quot; director <span id="lw_1172578221_22" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">James Cameron</span> and Canadian TV-director Simcha Jacobovici are claiming they have evidence of a Jerusalem tomb that allegedly houses the remains of Jesus and his family. However the foremost archaeologists in Israel have slammed the claims as totally without foundation.<br />
<br />
Israeli archeologist Amos Kloner, who was in charge of the 1980 investigation of the tomb which is the subject of the new claims by Cameron-Jacobovici, said &quot;The claim that the burial site has been found is not based on any proof, and is only an attempt to sell.&quot; Kloner added, &quot;I refute all claims and efforts to waken a renewed interest in the findings. With all due respect, they are not archeologists.&quot; Kloner said that while &quot;it makes a great story for a TV film,&quot; there is &quot;no likelihood&quot; that Jesus and his relatives had a family tomb, and dismissed the claims as &quot;impossible&quot; and &quot;nonsense.&quot; <br />
<br />
&quot;Not a Lenten season goes by without some author or TV program seeking to cast doubt on the divinity of Jesus and/or the Resurrection,&quot; said Catholic League president Bill Donohue, commenting on the hype generated. &quot;Last April,&quot; added Donohue, &quot;NBC's 'Dateline' featured the wholly discredited and downright laughable claims of Michael Baigent, and two years ago ABC treated us to a special that questioned every aspect of the Resurrection.&quot; He concluded, &quot;Now we have the Cameron-Jacobovici thesis.&quot;<br />
<br />
Archeologist Joe Zias, who spent a quarter-century at the Rockefeller University in <span id="lw_1172578221_23" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Jerusalem</span>, said &quot;Simcha has no credibility whatsoever.&quot; <br />
<br />
Donohue points out that &quot;Jacobovici's credibility explodes when one considers that he still believes the 2002 tale about an ossuary with the inscription, 'James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.'&quot; On June 18, 2003, the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) in a unanimous decision the 15-member committee, condemned the 'James ossuary' as a modern forgery.<br />
<br />
Donohue blasted the Discovery Channel for airing both the James ossuary fraud and the current one. &quot;The Discovery Channel aired the 2002 hoax and now it's back with the Titanic fraud. It's time the Discovery Channel discovered ethics and stopped with the sensationalism,&quot; he said.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4926</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4926</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3 class="entry-header">ADF attorney encourages small towns to combat against adult businesses</h3>
<div class="entry" id="entry-1388">
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body">Allie Martin<br />
<small><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 20, 2007</font></small><br />
<br />
<span class="floatimgleft"></span> 
<div>An attorney with the pro-family Alliance Defense Fund says many small cities and municipalities are starting to look for ways to keep adult businesses out of their communities. Recently, several Kentucky counties enacted ordinances or began considering ordinances regarding sexually oriented businesses such as adult bookstores and strip clubs.<br />
</div>
</div>
<div class="entry-more" id="more">
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/">Alliance Defense Fund</a> (ADF) senior legal counsel Mike Johnson says it is important for cities, especially smaller ones, to get laws on the books before any adult businesses open their doors. He is encouraging officials, particularly in small cities and municipalities, to be proactive when it comes to approving ordinances restricting sexually-oriented businesses.</div>
<div>&quot;The problem is we actually have a new phenomenon that's been coined 'freeway porn,' and it describes the fact that a lot of the larger cities have actually passed pretty stringent regulations on the porn industry,&quot; Johnson notes. As a result, &quot;porn operators are seeking out smaller towns and rural communities that are still located near Interstate corridors so they can still have the heavy traffic access,&quot; he explains, &quot;but they're looking to these smaller communities to set up shop.&quot;</div>
<div>For this reason, the ADF attorney contends, local city officials must take steps to deal with the issue of porn before it becomes a problem. &quot;We've spent quite a bit of time trying to remind and encourage cities to take a look at this before it's too late,&quot; he says. </div>
<div>&quot;Sometimes, if one of these businesses is allowed to come in, once they set up shop, in some states they'll be grandfathered in,&quot; Johnson warns. &quot;So it certainly behooves a local community to enact an ordinance like this,&quot; he says. &quot;It's a very simple process.&quot;</div>
<div>Numerous studies exist that detail the negative secondary effects of adult bookstores, strip clubs and other sexually-oriented businesses on the areas where they are situated, Johnson notes. He says although the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that communities must allow such businesses, those communities do have the authority to regulate these establishments and decide where they can locate.</div>
<br />
</div>
<br />
<br />
</div>
<div class="entry-content" align="center"><small><font size="2">All Original Content </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/policies.php#01"><font size="2">Copyright</font></a><font size="2"> 2006-2007 American Family News Network - All Rights Reserved</font></small><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4755</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4755</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Option Ultrasound Saving Lives</font></strong></div>
<div>by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Program lets pregnant women see an image of their preborn child.</em>
<div>
<div>Focus on the Family's Option Ultrasound Program (OUP) is encouraging thousands of pregnant women to choose life.</div>
<div>Since its inception in January 2004, OUP has placed 287 ultrasound services in medical pregnancy-resource centers in 46 states. Approximately 34,000 babies have potentially been saved.</div>
<div>Sue Parker, executive director of Life Choices in Memphis, Tenn., said OUP helped her center begin offering ultrasound just over a month ago.</div>
<div>&quot;Women want to seek an answer to their problems -- and they see their pregnancy as a problem,&quot; she said. &quot;A center that is making the ultrasound tool available gives women the opportunity to explore their options from a legitimate medical perspective.&quot; </div>
<div>Her county reports more than 7,000 abortions annually, so the need for a pro-life alternative is great.</div>
<div>&quot;In our first month, even without the benefit of advertising, we saw about 35 ultrasounds,&quot; Parker said. &quot;We took everything the Option Ultrasound Program had built into us and made it come alive for these girls.&quot;</div>
<div>Kim Conroy, director of Focus on the Family's Sanctity of Human Life outreach, said 88 percent of abortion-minded women who seek counseling and ultrasound services leave a pregnancy-resource center with the intention of carrying their babies to term.</div>
<div>&quot;Women need the truth when faced with the challenging circumstances that lead them to consider abortion,&quot; she said. &quot;Ultrasound examinations provide medical confirmation of their pregnancy and are a crucial tool to help women make positive decisions for themselves and their babies.&quot;</div>
<div>That's exactly what happened when a teenager and her parents visited Life Choices, Parker said. The girl agreed to an ultrasound just to see how far along she was.</div>
<div>&quot;It turned out her pregnancy was 17 weeks,&quot; she said. &quot;Literally on cue, the baby just moved -- and of course his heart was beating -- and he was just introducing himself to his mother.&quot; </div>
<div>Tearfully, the teen admitted that she had no idea her baby would look like a baby. She asked if her parents could join her in looking at the ultrasound images.</div>
<div>&quot;They came back with her and literally they went from being in the waiting room and being abortion-minded to walking just a few yards and becoming pro-life,&quot; Parker said. &quot;They said, 'This is our grandchild! Honey, I don't know how this is all going to work, but we're going to work it out.' &quot;</div>
<div>Parker said Life Choices was able to tell them, &quot;We're going to be there with you through this. We'll help you make a plan for your baby.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4754</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4754</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>World's Most Premature Baby Amillia Goes Home After Early Birth<br />
<br />
</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
February 20</em><em>, 2007</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Miami, FL (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>Amillia Taylor is fighting for her life and the odds are against her. She was <strong>born at just 21 weeks</strong> into the pregnancy four months ago at Miami's Baptist Children's Hospital. With no baby born before 23 weeks surviving at length, Amillia has gone home to be cared for under the watchful eye of her parents.
<div>Taylor was just 284 grams<strong> (10 ounces) and 24 centimeters (9.25 inches</strong>) long when she was born and doctors typically say that babies weighing less than 400 grams have very little change of surviving.</div>
<div>Babies born at full-term typically spent 37 to 40 weeks inside their mothers before delivery.</div>
<div>Her mother, 37 year-old Sonja Taylor, faced fertility issues and used in-vitro fertilization to conceive Amillia. But she battled problems throughout the pregnancy.</div>
<div>Mother <strong>delivered baby at 21 weeks</strong> on October 24 and Amillia was barely breathing. Her parents named her for a Latin word meaning &quot;resilient, fighter, hardworking.&quot;</div>
<div>The resilient fighter hasn't given up and her parents told the media about their daughter's spirit.<br />
&quot;I'm still in amazement,&quot; Sonja said. &quot;It was hard to imagine she would get this far.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;I wanted her to have a chance, and I knew in my heart that she was going to make it,&quot; she added.</div>
<div>Dr. William Smalling told the Associated Press on Monday that physicians treating Amillia &quot;weren't too optimistic. But she proved us all wrong.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;She's going to be in a normal crib, she's going to have normal feedings, she's taking all her feedings from a bottle,&quot; Smalling said. </div>
<div>Amillia has dealt with some breathing issues, very mild brain hemorrhage and digestive problems since her birth but none of them will cause any negative long-term effects.</div>
<div>&quot;We can deal with lungs and things like that but, of course, the brain is the most important,&quot; Dr. Paul Fassbach told AP. &quot;But her prognosis is excellent.&quot;<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4753</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4753</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Student May Hand Out Valentine Bibles</font></strong></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>A <strong>North Carolina</strong> elementary school student who was told he couldn't give Bibles to classmates on Valentine's Day will now be allowed to during non-instructional time.</div>
<div>Adam Prevette, a second grader at Roaring Elementary, brought &quot;Truth for Youth&quot; Bibles for his classmates, but his teacher forbid him to hand them out.</div>
<div>Toni Prevette, Adam's mother, contacted Liberty Counsel for information on students' rights and passed it along to the principal. After consulting with district officials, the principal apologized.</div>
<div>Mathew Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel, said kids have a right to share their opinions.</div>
<div>&quot;Students have a constitutional right to give Bibles to their friends on Valentine's Day while other students are giving out cards,&quot; he said. &quot;Students are not hostages of public schools.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4752</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4752</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">U.S. Attorney General Announces Religious-Liberty Project</font></strong></div>
<div>by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Department of Justice will offer education, defense.</em>
<div>
<div>U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announced this week that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is committed to ending religious discrimination. </div>
<div>He announced to a gathering of Southern Baptist Convention leaders the &quot;First Freedom Project,&quot; which he described as &quot;a legacy of protection unequaled since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;I am charged by the president with protecting and preserving not only the safety and security of all Americans, but also their rights, liberties and freedoms,&quot; Gonzales said. &quot;One of our most cherished freedoms -- one we've sacrificed greatly to defend -- is our religious liberty.&quot;</div>
<div>He said religious freedom is a fundamental part of the nation's history.</div>
<div>&quot;Before free speech, before freedom of the press, before all of these other crucial rights, we put freedom of religion,&quot; Gonzales said. &quot;Our Founders were men of faith. They understood the importance of a government that respected and protected the 'First Freedom.' &quot;</div>
<div>The project will include:</div>
<div>-- A Religious Freedom Task Force to review policies and cases.</div>
<div>-- Public education on religious and civil rights.</div>
<div>-- Regional training seminars for public leaders.</div>
<div>-- A Web site, firstfreedom.gov, with information on laws regarding religious freedom.</div>
<div>Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family Action, applauded the initiative.</div>
<div>&quot;With a Congress now controlled by Democrats who are typically not receptive to new legislative proposals on the subject of protecting religious liberties,&quot; he said, &quot;it's a wise idea to refocus attention on enforcement and education efforts.&quot;</div>
<div>The DOJ has actively intervened on behalf of religious liberties during the Bush administration with good success, Hausknecht added.</div>
<div>&quot;With the higher profile that this task force will bring about,&quot; he said, &quot;I would hope for and expect even greater progress in defending, as well as promoting, our First Freedom.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4751</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4751</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<h2>Lawmakers to Consider Hate-Crimes Legislation</h2>
<div class="author">by Amanda Banks, federal policy analyst</div>
<div>
<div><em>Let your representatives know what you think.</em>
<div class="text">
<div>Rep. John Conyers is soon expected to introduce hate-crimes legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives.</div>
<div>The Michigan Democrat chairs the Judiciary Committee, the first stop for the legislation.</div>
<div>While other hate-crimes bills have been introduced this year, Conyers&rsquo; legislation is expected to be the primary one to be considered and voted on.</div>
<div>Conyers told House members last week that his bill will be identical to legislation passed by the House in 2005. The legislation creates a special class of people identified only by the undefined terms &ldquo;sexual orientation&rdquo; and &ldquo;gender identity,&rdquo; and offers protections on par with race, color, religion and national origin.</div>
<div><strong>TAKE ACTION:</strong><br />
Members of the House Judiciary Committee need to hear from concerned Americans this week. A party-line committee vote is anticipated, with Democrats voting for the hate-crimes legislation and Republicans voting against. Look through the list below and see whether your representative is on the Judiciary Committee. Please make a special point to contact committee Democrats and ask that they oppose hate-crimes legislation. And thank Republicans for their opposition to the legislation and encourage them to vote against it again. You can contact your lawmakers through the CitizenLink Action Center. If you are a CitizenLink Daily Update subscriber, click on the blue &quot;Take Action&quot; button in the e-mail to be automatically logged in to our Action Center. Otherwise, click on <a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/dotnet/WebPublish/controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&amp;Definition=Home&amp;XSL=Home&amp;SV_Section=Home">this link</a>.</div>
<div>House Judiciary Committee Members:<br />
 <br />
Chairman Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich, 14th <br />
Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., 28th <br />
Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., 9th <br />
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., 8th  <br />
Rep. Robert Scott, D-Va., 3rd <br />
Rep. Melvin Watt, D-N.C., 12th <br />
Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., 16th <br />
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, 18th <br />
Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., 35th <br />
Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Mass., 5th <br />
Rep. William Delahunt, D-Mass., 10th <br />
Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Fla., 19th <br />
Rep. Linda S&aacute;nchez, D-Calif., 39th <br />
Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., 9th <br />
Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., 4th <br />
Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., 4th <br />
Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., 27th<br />
Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., 9th <br />
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., 29th <br />
Rep. Artur Davis, D-Ala., 7th <br />
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., 20th <br />
Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., 5th </div>
<div>Ranking Member Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, 21st <br />
Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr., R-Wisc., 5th <br />
Rep. Howard Coble, R-N.C., 6th <br />
Rep. Elton Gallegly, R-Calif., 24th <br />
Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., 6th <br />
Rep. Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, 1st <br />
Rep. Daniel Lungren, R-Calif., 3rd <br />
Rep. Chris Cannon, R-Utah, 3rd <br />
Rep. Ric Keller, R-Fla., 8th <br />
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., 49th <br />
Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., 6th <br />
Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., 4th <br />
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, 5th <br />
Rep. Tom Feeney, R-Fla., 24th <br />
Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., 2nd <br />
Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, 1st <br />
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, 4th </div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4750</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4750</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>A Tale of Two Cities: Resisting the Atheist Attack</strong></div>
<div>Every generation has a few atheists who seem eager to tell the world how much smarter they are than everybody else.  The fact that such individuals still exist, and that they are still producing popular tracts in defense of their disbelief, is no surprise.  </div>
<div>Nevertheless, because ideas have consequences, one cannot ignore the recent push by big-name skeptics to persuade Americans that there is no God and that we should therefore adopt a new set of ethical standards.  In previous times, most people had a solid enough understanding of moral truth that they were not easily persuaded by atheist rhetoric, but today many Americans are so influenced by relativism that they find it difficult to respond.  Some men and women are beginning to wonder if they really believe America's founding principles, as stated in the Declaration of Independence, that &quot;all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights...&quot;</div>
<div>A couple of weeks ago, Peter Singer, a bioethicist at Princeton University, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/26/opinion/26singer.html?ex=1170824400&amp;en=6a537753690937f8&amp;ei=5070"><font color="#666600">wrote an article</font></a> for the <em>New York Times</em> that essentially denies the Declaration's core principles.  While discussing the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashley_Treatment"><font color="#666600">sad case of Ashley</font></a>, a severely disabled girl whose parents had her uterus removed and put her on hormones to stunt her growth, Singer said:</div>
<blockquote>
<div>We are always ready to find dignity in human beings, including those whose mental age will never exceed that of an infant, but we don't attribute dignity to dogs or cats, though they clearly operate at a more advanced mental level than human infants. Just making that comparison provokes outrage in some quarters. But why should dignity always go together with species membership, no matter what the characteristics of the individual may be?....[Ashley] is precious not so much for what she is, but because her parents and siblings love her and care about her.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>In Singer's mind, Ashley is not precious for what she is, and she does not have dignity simply because she is human.  He even strongly implies that dogs and cats have more dignity than this handicapped little girl.  Yet the Founders believed that all people are created equal, even those whose mental age does not advance very far.  </div>
<div>We have here a tale of two cities.  One is the city envisioned by the Founders where God has created all men and women with a fundamental equality which ensures that every person's rights are secure.  The strong do not have more worth than the weak, the young do not have more value than the old, and the rich do not have more human rights than the poor.  The self-evident truth is that, despite the differences, every human being enjoys an essential dignity.  Every life is precious, even the wretched, weak, penniless, despised, feeble and frightened.</div>
<div>Then there is the city envisioned by modern atheists like Peter Singer.  This is a place where a dog can have more worth than a handicapped child.  This is a place where a grandmother with Alzheimer's disease has no dignity if she has no one who loves her.  This is a place where newborn babies can be killed if they are imperfect or unwanted.  It is a godless city where human worth is measured on a sliding scale.  Woe is she who is wretched, weak, penniless, despised, feeble and frightened. Such people may have been better off as a dog or a cat than an unwanted and imperfect human being!</div>
<div>Ultimately, America will choose one city or the other as its destiny.  This week we celebrated the 96th birthday of the man who saw the United States as the shining city on a hill, Ronald Reagan.  As the late president said, &quot;A troubled and afflicted mankind looks to us, pleading for us to keep our rendezvous with destiny; that we will uphold the principles of self-reliance, self-discipline, morality, and, above all, responsible liberty for every individual, that we will become that shining city on a hill.&quot;  This is the same city envisioned by the Founders, and it is the vision that is still admired by a troubled and afflicted mankind.</div>
<div>How might we guard against the men and women who try to persuade us that God does not exist, that there is no inherent human dignity, and that some people have less worth than others?  If ideas really do have consequences, this set of ideas will inevitably lead to great human suffering and utter cultural collapse.  Therefore, how can America keep its &quot;rendezvous with destiny&quot; and protect the shining city?</div>
<div>Our response must be multifaceted. First, men and women of faith should be educated in their own intellectual heritage.  Many of the great Christian minds of the past have confronted similar challenges in their own generation, and they have left behind solid answers.  Atheism is not new, nor is the idea that some human beings lack inherent worth.  Rather than reinvent the wheel, we should become <font size="2">acquainted </font>with the way these challenges were previously addressed.</div>
<div>Christians must also be involved in the culture.  Though a few famous atheists are churning out books, it is the movie makers, the song writers, and the television show creators that have the greatest influence.  The church has a long history of producing beautiful and captivating art; there is no reason why Christians should not continue to engage and inspire the culture through art.  One outstanding movie can do more to influence the culture than dozens of scholarly books.  </div>
<div>Finally, Christians must be involved in the public square.  When the ideas of Peter Singer, Richard Dawkins, and Sam Harris are translated into laws, injustice results.  It is terrifying to contemplate a world where the law does not consider human beings to have any inherent value or dignity.  We have seen this world in the past; we must never allow it to happen again.  As Christians, our obligation is to love and serve our neighbors by remaining a persistent public voice in resistance to the growing threat against our culture and our nation. We must not abandon the shining city on the hill. </div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4749</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4749</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3 class="entry-header">Groups accuse McCain of attempting to censor political speech</h3>
<div class="entry" id="entry-1377">
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body">Jim Brown<br />
<small><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 19, 2007</font></small><br />
<br />
<span class="floatimgleft"></span>
<div>A coalition of 18 advocacy groups is opposing Arizona Senator John McCain's plans to introduce legislation to ban so-called &quot;527&quot; groups. McCain is preparing legislation that coalition leaders believe would stifle the political speech of groups that, ironically, were started as a result of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill passed by Congress in 2002.<br />
</div>
</div>
<div class="entry-more" id="more">
<div>Groups that fall under the 527 category include left-wing organizations such as MoveOn.org as well as right-wing groups like the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, which played a large role in Senator John Kerry's defeat in the 2004 Presidential election. </div>
<div>Tim Lee, director of legal and public affairs at the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cfif.org/">Center for Individual Freedom</a>, says the planned legislation would further extend free-speech restrictions that are already contained in McCain-Feingold. &quot;The reason this is particularly important right now,&quot; he contends, &quot;is that it's sort of a smokescreen for Senator McCain because, for years and years, he's tried to foist public financing of campaigns on taxpayers.&quot;</div>
<div>And what that means in layman's terms, Lee says, &quot;is having taxpayers fund politicians who are running for president.&quot; And now that McCain is seen as leading contender for the Republican presidential nomination, the senator appears to be willing to abandon his commitment to abide by the public financing system, the Center spokesman asserts. </div>
<div>Now that McCain is &quot;kind of the frontrunner and stands to gain a lot more money by going outside the public financing system, he himself isn't even going to abide by it, it appears,&quot; Lee points out. &quot;That shows some hypocrisy,&quot; he says; &quot;so now [the senator] turns around and goes after these 527 groups, which compounds the problem and serves as a smokescreen for his own apparent hypocrisy.&quot;</div>
<div>Based on Senator McCain's recent actions, Lee adds, the presidential hopeful's &quot;Straight Talk Express&quot; campaign slogan &quot;appears to have taken a U-turn.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4748</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4748</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="3">Was Washington Really a Deist?</font></strong></div>
<div>By <strong>Michael and Jana Novak</strong></div>
<div>As we approach George Washington&rsquo;s birthday&mdash;so often lost these days in the good shopping bargains of a long holiday weekend&mdash;it seems fitting to celebrate the whole man Washington was in light of the hottest issue in the world just now, religion.</div>
<div>Most historians of the last hundred years have said the Father of Our Nation was a deist (in his excellent recent biography, Joseph Ellis called Washington a &ldquo;lukewarm Episcopalian and quasi-Deist&rdquo;) and suggest, along the way, that his virtues were Stoic rather than Christian, and his appeals to Providence rather more Greek and Roman than biblical. Since Washington speaks seldom of Jesus Christ, and almost never invokes the Savior or Redeemer or Trinity but prefers to use philosophical names for God (&rdquo;Beneficent Author of all good,&rdquo; &ldquo;Divine Providence,&rdquo; &ldquo;Almighty Ruler of the Universe&rdquo;), it is easy to think he was a deist.</div>
<div>A more sustained investigation into Washington&rsquo;s God, however, makes all claims that he was a deist highly problematic and finally untenable. </div>
<div>Deism is not exactly a creed with clear tenets; it is more like a tendency of the mind; a movement like rationalism or romanticism; and, in the view of some historians of ideas, a half-way marker slowly moving from Jewish or Christian orthodoxy toward early modern science. The general drift of deism is that the originating and governing force of the universe is the god of modern rationalists (Newton, Spinoza, et al.), not at all like the Great God Jehovah of the Hebrew Bible. Deists prefer the god of reason to the God of revelation. </div>
<div>The latter has a special love and care for particular peoples and persons, unlike the deist god, who is impersonal and indifferent to the world he sets in motion. The God of revelation intervenes and interposes in historical events and personal lives, and hears and answers prayers; the god of reason does no such things. At the same time, from various motives some Christians, even bishops and clergymen, described themselves as deists as well as Christians.</div>
<div>Still, in one sense &ldquo;deist&rdquo; is intended as the opposite of &ldquo;Christian&rdquo; or &ldquo;Jewish,&rdquo; and incompatible with them. To say that Washington is a deist is in this sense to derogate from his being Christian. The evidence on this point comes down to this: When Washington prays and urges the nation (or his army) to pray, does he expect God to care about the fate of the American cause, as distinct from the British cause, since they also pray to the same God? Does he imagine God actually interposing himself in the events of history? Or inspiring a human mind with ideas, or forgiving sins?</div>
<div>The most important answer to these questions is found in the prayers that, as general and as president, Washington publicly urged upon the army and the nation. The Thanksgiving Proclamation of 1789 declared it &ldquo;the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor . . . and beseech him to pardon our national and other transgressions.&rdquo; </div>
<div>In a letter announcing his retirement from the army at the close of the War, he wrote: &ldquo;I now make it my earnest prayer, that God would have you, and the State over which you preside, in his holy protection, that he would incline the hearts of the Citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to Government, to entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another, for their fellow Citizens of the United States at large, and particularly for their brethren who have served in the Field, and finally, that he would most graciously be pleased to dispose us all, to do Justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that Charity, humility and pacific temper of mind, which were the Characteristicks of the Divine Author of our blessed Religion, and without an humble imitation of whose example in these things, we can never hope to be a happy Nation.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Clearly these samples, only a small part of what might be adduced, are not the prayers of a deist to an impersonal, nonintervening god. These are the words of someone who <em>expects</em> God to be deeply involved in our nation&rsquo;s welfare. Why? Because he made the world for liberty, and our nation was, under God, a pioneer in political, civil, and religious liberties. </div>
<div>These are the prayers, the <em>non-deistic</em> prayers, which gave General Washington fortitude and hope in the very dark days of more than 230 years ago, in 1776. Now again, we are a nation in great need, under the powerful threat of a murderous worldwide terrorism. So it does not seem wrong for us, either, to &ldquo;beseech the kind Author of these blessings . . . to dispose us to merit the continuance of His favors.&rdquo;</div>
<div><em>Michael Novak and Jana Novak are the co-authors of</em> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FWashingtons-God-Religion-Liberty-Country%2Fdp%2F0465051278%2Fsr%3D8-2%2Fqid%3D1171568680%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks&amp;tag=firstthings-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">Washington&rsquo;s God: Religion, Liberty, and the Father of Our Country</a><img height="1" alt="" width="1" border="0" /><em>.</em></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4747</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4747</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">Look to God, Not Your Spouse, for True Fulfillment</font></strong></div>
<div><strong><font size="4">Dr. Gary Smalley</font></strong></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><font size="2">When my wife stopped fighting me about my obsession toward work, as well as other issues, she unleashed a powerful force in my life, though neither of us understood it at the time.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Independent of me, Norma learned how to get in line and bring her needs to God. Rather than complain to me, she prayed, &quot;Lord, thank you that all I need is you. You know I want a good relationship with Gary and that I want him to spend more time at home. You also know that I'm not very strong physically. I'm so tired that I don't feel I can last much longer under this strain. I'm coming to you with these requests because I know that if I need Gary at home, you can make it happen. Or you can take away my desire for him to be home. I'm going to stop fighting Gary and instead ask you either to change him or to meet my needs in some other way.&quot;</font></div>
<div><font size="2">To find God's fulfillment, Norma took steps similar to those I later discovered. She stopped expecting life from me and started looking to God. She realized I not only would not, but could not, energize her life, so she went to the source of life and asked Him to energize her.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">The results were startling. I noticed the change almost immediately. When I came home from work, I sensed a calm spirit in our house. Norma's face was peaceful, no longer tense. Instead of the usual harsh words, her conversation was quiet and she was more interested in asking me how my day had gone that in relating her activities with the children.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">It was in that context that Norma talked to me about her need for help. A few days later, I couldn't keep from asking what had happened. &quot;Gary, I got tired of fighting you,&quot; she explained calmly. &quot;I realized that I wasn't trusting God concerning our marriage and family, and so I decided to stop complaining and start praying. I've told God that I would like you to spend more time at home, and if I really need that, I know God will make the necessary changes.&quot;</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Imagine what that did to me. I was instantly convicted that my priorities were wrong. And that wasn't all. Because Norma had changed, I wanted to spend more time at home. That was the week I asked Bill to change my job so I could spend more time meeting my family's needs.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">What Norma did summarizes the conclusion of the first four chapters of this book. She stopped looking to people, things, and her work, and turned instead to a trustworthy God who answers the persistent prayers of His children. God promises life -- and God delivers!</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Some may think Norma just disguised her selfishness by asking God to change me instead of nagging me to change. I disagree. I encourage wives to ask God for a good relationship with their husbands and children. That request is not selfish. A good relationship benefits not only the wife, but the entire family, the Christian community, and ultimately our nation and the entire world. It also glorifies God, because a godly marriage is a picture of our relationship with Jesus Christ (see Ephesians 5:22-25).</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Once we're into the habit of seeking fulfillment from the world, we won't learn overnight to look to God as the source of life. It took Norma and me several years before looking to the Lord became our natural, first response, and we still catch ourselves focusing on someone or something other than God.<br />
<br />
&copy; Copyright 2002 <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.smalleyonline.com/">Smalley Relationship Center</a></font></div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div><strong>Find this article at: </strong>http://www.crosswalk.com/marriage/1372925/<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4746</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4746</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><font size="5">How secularism is attempting to abolish the truth in our culture<br />
<br />
</font>AFA Journal </em>interviewed author David Limbaugh about his new book <em>Persecution: How Liberals are Waging War Against Christianity.</em> See review below. <br />
<br />
<strong>What is the main premise of your book?</strong><br />
The idea is that Christianity is disfavored in our popular culture, which feels free to impugn Christians, discriminate against them, show intolerance toward them, and suppress their religious liberty, all the while touting tolerance. These are the very people who scream the loudest in support of religious liberty.<br />
<br />
<strong>Why this particular topic?</strong><br />
As a syndicated columnist and observer of current events, I would constantly run across examples of discrimination against Christians and an effort to scrub away Christianity from the public square, and to replace Judeo-Christian values with anti-Christian values. I would see examples of that day after day in the news media and I thought it represented a systematic pattern of discrimination, as part of a larger culture war against Christianity. <br />
<br />
I thought it ought to be documented in a book, as opposed to just writing column after column about it. I wanted to show that there were enough examples on a broad enough range of venues to indicate a systematic pattern of discrimination.<br />
<br />
<strong>How did you become involved in the culture wars?</strong><br />
I became a Christian about 15 years ago, and had been a political, economic and social conservative before that, and I had bemoaned the loss of the values in our culture and the fact that secular humanists have been trying to take over. I really believe that Judeo-Christian values are at the root of all of our liberties, they are at the root of the kind of society that we have, and to the extent that those values are undermined, our entire library of liberties will implode and the type of society that we live in will disappear.<br />
<br />
My book wasn&rsquo;t for the purpose of declaring myself an activist in the culture wars, but it was to issue a clarion call to Christians and other lovers of liberty that they should wake up and realize that their values and religious liberties are under assault, and if they don&rsquo;t do something about it, the situation will get worse and eventually we will lose the very type of government that we have. Ironically, our nation is the freest in the history of the world precisely because of its Judeo-Christian roots.<br />
<br />
<strong>Why do you suppose Christianity has been singled out for discrimination while deference has been shown to other faiths?</strong><br />
Christianity stands for moral absolutes, and we live in a postmodern culture which champions the notion of moral relativism. In fact, it even champions the notion that truth itself is a social construct. So postmodernists abhor moral absolutes.<br />
<br />
There are other religions which subscribe to moral absolutism, such as Islam and Judaism, but Christianity is perceived as the majority religion in this country. Those who would like to have their values prevail in the culture have to go through this Christian majority first. And so Christianity is the enemy.<br />
<br />
On a spiritual level they are against it because the truth divides, and I happen to believe Christianity is Truth with a capital &quot;T.&quot; I think those who are followers of the Lie have an allergy to the truth, and have an aversion and a hostility to the truth. So they gravitate to a position that is militant against Christianity.<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>What would you say to those who argue that, as the dominant religious group in the U.S., Christians are absurd to claim persecution?</strong><br />
It is absurd to say that a majority cannot allow itself to be discriminated against &ndash; look at South Africa [during apartheid], look at women in this country. Majorities are discriminated against all the time.<br />
<br />
And we don&rsquo;t have to talk about theories or possibilities or potential here. I have evidence in the book &ndash; some 800 footnotes, and I could have had twice that many if people were able to digest an 800-page book &ndash; which demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that a systematic pattern of discrimination is going on against Christians and Christianity.<br />
<br />
<strong>Since we live in a pluralistic culture, how can we return to one that is faith-based?</strong><br />
As much as some Christians don&rsquo;t like to do this, we have to fight in the political arena, because we have to have a climate of political and religious freedom in order to even evangelize, and to honor the Great Commission. So while some Christians want to sit on their moral high horse and say, &lsquo;This is a spiritual battle, we should not dirty our hands in the world of politics,&rsquo; I say it&rsquo;s a good thing the framers of our Constitution did not subscribe to that passive worldview. They believed that they had a duty to implement protections and safeguards in our Constitution against encroachments against religious liberty.<br />
<br />
But I also think Christians have to demonstrate a Christlike example and be salt and light, and we have to try to evangelize through our conduct, and how we live our own lives. It&rsquo;s one person, one soul, one convert at a time, and it is not going to be an easy fix. And it may not even happen. While I am not an alarmist, and I don&rsquo;t think the sky is falling yet, I am also not confident that we can turn it around. I&rsquo;m optimistic, but I realize that it is an uphill battle because our culture is so violently opposed to Judeo-Christian values that it&rsquo;s going to be tough to turn it around.<br />
<br />
I do see an increased polarization in our nation. Some people say, &lsquo;Well, I see a revival going on. I see a return to a faith-based society.&rsquo; Well, I see that, too, but I also see on the other end of the spectrum an increasing extremism against Christianity. So that&rsquo;s why I say I think we&rsquo;re becoming increasingly polarized.<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>How can we expect to reinvigorate the culture when major Christian denominations, like the Episcopal Church and the United Methodist Church, are in chaos?</strong><br />
One of the primary places that is under assault in this country is the church, and of course, what better place to undermine Christianity than at its heart. That&rsquo;s been going on, and we&rsquo;ve seen a corruption in our theology, a slipping away from the truth, from Scripture, and a corruption of our church hierarchies.<br />
<br />
If we don&rsquo;t clean up our churches, we don&rsquo;t have much of a chance to clean up the culture proper. Any long-range solution has to begin with taking back the churches for the truth and the Bible.<br />]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4745</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4745</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="4">Mental health expert highlights abortion's impact on men</font></strong></div>
<div id="entry-1348">
<div>
<div>Jim Brown and Jody Brown<br />
<small><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 19, 2007</font></small><br />
<br />
 
<div>A campus psychiatrist at UCLA is drawing attention to the only study she has found on young men's responses to abortion. Those men, she asserts, are part of a group of abortion victims who have been essentially &quot;invisible&quot; to those in her profession. Mental health professionals, she says, need to stop ignoring the reality that abortion leaves emotional scars.</div>
</div>
<div id="more">
<div>The study on men's responses to abortion was not conducted by a mental health professional, but rather a sociologist and academic by the name of Dr. Arthur Shostak. Shostak surveyed 1,000 men sitting in the waiting rooms of abortion facilities across the U.S. and found that 80 percent of those men indicated that that had been the longest and darkest day of their life. </div>
<div>Dr. Miriam Grossman, a psychiatrist at UCLA's student health service, says Shostak then followed those men for months, and even some for years.</div>
<div>&quot;The numbers went up [over that time],&quot; she observes. &quot;The number of men who reported that day feeling some guilt and some ambivalence about what they were doing; the number of men who were asked 'Do you think that in the future you might have some troubling thoughts about this?' -- the percentages went up.&quot; Adds Grossman: &quot;So a few years afterwards, they were reporting that it was worse than they had anticipated.&quot;</div>
<div>Grossman says men's reactions to abortion have been ignored by her colleagues in the mental health field. &quot;There is a significant number of people who do have those scars and that painfulness,&quot; she says, &quot;and if we are going to be open to victims of every sort, then we in mental health need to be acknowledging them even if they don't advance a particular ideology.&quot;</div>
<div>In fact, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.futureshaping.com/shostak/pages/essayAbortion.html">commenting on his research</a>, Dr. Shostak has suggested the professional counseling community adopt what he calls a &quot;pro-couple approach to the abortion challenge&quot; that can help those who have abortions recover from &quot;an experience from which they are never quite the same.&quot; According to Grossman, Shostak conducted the research because he went through an abortion as a grad student and has wondered ever since what would have happened had he and his partner decided differently.</div>
<div><strong>Help for the 'invisible'</strong></div>
<div>Grossman is author of the book Unprotected: A Campus Psychiatrist Reveals How Political Correctness in Her Field Endangers Every Student. During a December 2006 interview with <em><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmQxZTkyYTk0YWVhNzAyNmI5ZTEyOTM4NjZjNTM1Zjc=">National Review Online</a></em> about the book, she explained that her purpose was to shed light on the existence of &quot;an invisible group&quot; -- specifically, both men and women who carry emotional scars from an abortion.</div>
<div>&quot;They are out there in numbers; many must seek support from networks outside our mental-health system,&quot; she told NRO. &quot;This is because although individual practitioners may be sensitive to the trauma of abortion, the mental-health establishment denies it exists.&quot;</div>
<div>Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion-provider in the world, claims that most women who have an abortion do not carry emotional scars afterward. While not denying that may be the case, Grossman contends that does not do away with the need for mental health professionals to identify and assist victims of abortion.</div>
<div>&quot;[I]f only one percent of the one million-plus girls and women getting abortions each year suffer severe emotional consequences, that&rsquo;s still tens of thousands of people,&quot; she stated. And the author and psychiatrist confesses that before doing the research for her book, she was unaware of &quot;how horrifying an abortion might be under some circumstances, and how there may be long-lasting consequences.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4744</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4744</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Brownback and 35 Other Senators Urge President to Champion Life Issues</strong><br />
<br />
<div><span id="lw_1171805387_2">WASHINGTON</span>, February 16, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - U.S. Senator Sam Brownback joined 34 senators yesterday urging President Bush to uphold and champion pro-life policy. </div>
<div>&quot;President Bush has shown that he is committed to protecting the dignity of every life, from the unborn to the elderly,&quot; said Brownback. &quot;Now that we have a Democrat-controlled Congress, I respectfully urge President Bush to remind my colleagues of his commitment to pro-life policies.&quot; </div>
<div>Brownback sent a letter to the <span id="lw_1171805387_3">White House</span> Thursday asking President Bush to issue a letter to the Congress reaffirming the White House's pro-life stance. The letter was signed by 35 senators, including Brownback. </div>
<div>Brownback continued, &quot;A letter sent to Congress from President Bush would be a powerful reminder that the <span id="lw_1171805387_4">United States</span> is a country that is committed to protecting the dignity of human life. I look forward to working with my colleagues on important life-related legislation.&quot;</div>
<div>Following is the full text of the letter sent to President Bush:</div>
<div>&quot;We respectfully request that you issue a letter to the Senate and House Leadership, reaffirming your strong pro-life policy convictions and serving notice that you will veto any legislation that weakens present pro-life policy.</div>
<div>&quot;President George H.W. Bush issued such a letter on June 4, 1991 to great effect when he was confronted with a Democrat-controlled Congress. An examination of the record will show that attacks of pro-life policy in the Democrat-controlled Congress were much more vociferous prior to the June 4 letter than they were after the letter. It seems that committee chairs were more successful in holding pro-abortion provisions at bay when there was a formal declaration that their legislation had no chance of enactment if it contained pro-abortion and other anti-life measures that weakened present law or regulations.</div>
<div>&quot;Issuance of such a letter now would be timely and of tremendous value in our effort to ensure that no life-related policy is weakened during the 110th Congress. We thank you for your continued leadership and appreciate your consideration of this request.&quot;</div>
<div>The following senators joined Brownback in signing the letter: Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Pete Domenici (R-NM), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), John McCain (R-AZ), Trent Lott (R-MS), Larry Craig (R-ID), Bob Bennett (R-UT), Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-TX), Jim Inhofe (R-OK), Jon Kyle (R-AZ), Craig Thomas (R-WY), Pat Roberts (R-KS), Wayne Allard (R-CO), Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Chuck Hagel (R-NE), Mike Enzi (R-WY), Jim Bunning (R-KY), Mike Crapo (R-ID), George Voinovich (R-OH), John Ensign (R-NV), Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Elizabeth Dole (R-NC), John Cornyn (R-TX), Norm Coleman (R-MN), Richard Burr (R-NC), Jim DeMint (R-SC), Tom Coburn (R-OK), John Thune (R-SD), Johnny Isakson (R-GA), David Vitter (R-LA), Mel Martinez (R-FL), Bob Corker (R-TN).</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4743</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4743</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Federal Parental-Notification Bill Returns to House</strong></div>
<div>Legislation to protect parents' rights when their daughter is considering an abortion was reintroduced in Congress today.</div>
<div>H.R. 1063, The Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, sponsored by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., would prevent the transportation of minor girls across state lines to get an abortion in order to circumvent parental-involvement laws. </div>
<div>Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, called on the House to speedily pass the measure, which was approved by the House and the Senate last year, but blocked by Democrats before it could go to the president. </div>
<div>&quot;Parental involvement in a young girl&rsquo;s medical decisions is always important, but particularly so when the decision will have life-long consequences, such as is the case with abortion,&quot; she said. &quot;These are significant decisions that require the guidance of people who have the girl&rsquo;s best interest at heart -- not some stranger who would smuggle her across state lines under her parents' radar.&quot;</div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4742</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4742</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>National Guard Seeks Chaplains</strong><br />
from staff reports</div>
<div><em>There are more than 300 open positions.</em></div>
<div>The Army National Guard needs chaplains and is offering nearly $35,000 in incentives to attract candidates. </div>
<div>The Guard is operating at 40-percent chaplain capacity. There are more than 300 open positions -- more than half the total need -- and if the spaces aren&rsquo;t occupied soon, some guardsmen may be deployed without spiritual care. </div>
<div>The Guard is offering a $10,000 signing bonus on top of a $20,000 student-loan repayment and a $4,500 college-scholarship package to men and women age 21-to-42 who have a seminary degree and the endorsement of their denomination. The Guard has also set up a special recruiting Web site and sent DVDs to prospective chaplains.</div>
<div>Alex Person, who heads Focus on the Family's outreach to military chaplains, said they serve a vital need.</div>
<div>&quot;You&rsquo;re contributing something to the mission as well as the personal satisfaction,&quot; Person told Family News in Focus. &quot;It's the spirituality of serving God's people.&quot;</div>
<div>Dr. Billy Baugham, executive director of the International Conference of Evangelical Chaplain Endorsers, said part of the reason for the shortage is that most available chaplains are working with troops in combat.</div>
<div>&quot;We try to fill those units as much as we can, so that leaves the shortage back in the rear areas in the Reserves and in the Guard,&quot; he said. </div>
<div>Baugham also noted the Army has not decided whether it will continue to allow Christian chaplains to pray in Jesus' Name. </div>
<div>&quot;I'm very sad to say this prayer issue is still not going away,&quot; he said. </div>
<div>One other contributing factor: employers are not required to hold jobs for deployed National Guardsmen as they are for those in the Reserves. </div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4741</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4741</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>What Hath Darwin Wrought?</strong></div>
<div><strong></strong>Last week we briefly visited two cities.  The first city was the City on a Hill, the city envisioned by America's founders, which is built on the firm conviction that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with inalienable rights.  The second city is built on the teachings of Charles Darwin; not just his scientific theories, but, more importantly, their philosophical implications.  In recognition of his birthday, which was this week, let us more carefully explore Darwin's City.</div>
<div>Foundations are important.  In Darwin's City, the underlying story unfolds like this: In the beginning...there was a Big Bang.  A billion years after the Big Bang, stars and galaxies began to appear.  Billions of years later, planet Earth just happened to form.  Then, 3.7 billion years ago, in a warm little pond, quite by chance, life emerged.</div>
<div>&quot;Quite by chance&quot; is a reoccurring theme in this story.  Nobody intended for the Big Bang to happen, it just did.  All of the succeeding events occurred entirely by chance in Darwin's atheistic, impersonal world.  Everything in Darwin's City&mdash;every mountain and valley, every bird, fish, and mouse, every man, woman and child&mdash;has emerged from the same equation: matter + time + chance.  </div>
<div>The evolutionary-chance view of life is the foundation of both science and philosophy in Darwin's City.  Since ideas have consequences, Darwin's perspective creates a distinct view of the nature of man, the character of truth, and the meaning of life.  </div>
<div><strong>The Nature of Man</strong></div>
<div>Under the Darwinist view, human beings are not created in the image of God.   God is simply a creature of our imagination.  Human beings emerged gratuitously from the primordial ooze.  Since we are the product of mere chance, we have no inherent dignity, value or worth.</div>
<div>Creatures that came into being through mere happenstance don't have a claim to innate dignity.  If people and plants formed through the same random process, what objective standard determines that one is more valuable, or has more dignity, than the other?  Plants and people are simply different ways of organizing matter.  Neither have intrinsic value.  There is no basis for inalienable rights conferred by the Creator when the existence of the Creator is denied from the start.</div>
<div><strong>Truth</strong></div>
<div>Darwin's City has an emasculated notion of absolute truth.  Darwin maintains that we are creatures of mere chance, which means our brains are the result of chance, and the ideas formed in our brains are a matter of chance as well.  After all, for Darwinists, ideas are nothing more than complex chemical reactions in a complex but ultimately meaningless organ, the brain.  What do these chemical reactions have to do with &quot;truth&quot;?  As J. B. S. Haldane said, &quot;If my mental processes are determined wholly by the motions of atoms in my brain, I have no reason to suppose that my beliefs are true...and hence I have no reason for supposing my brain to be composed of atoms.&quot;  </div>
<div>The inevitable result of these beliefs is that there is no basis for rational discourse.  Who can really say that the movement of atoms in their brain is more correct than the movement of atoms in another's brain?  If both brains are happy, who cares?  Likewise, who could declare that some things are right, others are wrong?  In a universe that came about by pure chance there is absolutely no basis for right or wrong.  In a world where ideas are nothing more than chemical reactions and atomic movements in a dense organ at the top of the head, no one can say that some ideas are better than others.  All are equally arbitrary, all are equally meaningless.  This utterly eliminates all hope for rational discourse.  There is no basis for testing truth claims when truth does not exist.  </div>
<div>Who, then, wins in a disagreement?  From the Darwinist perspective, it's whoever is strongest&mdash;whoever survives and reproduces.   As Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes declared, truth is merely &quot;the majority vote of that nation that can lick all others.&quot; </div>
<div><strong>The Meaning of Life</strong></div>
<div>Darwin's views add up to a life without ultimate meaning.  In Darwin's City there is no ultimate goal to life, only existence, whatever existence is.  William Shakespeare captured the horror of this perspective in his play, <em>Macbeth</em>: &quot;Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player / That struts and frets his hour upon the stage / And then is heard no more; it is a tale / Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury / Signifying nothing.&quot; </div>
<div>The secularist-chance view of life breeds hopelessness and despair.  Human beings are mere creatures of chance, beyond the reach of truth, left to try to find meaning in existence when there is none.  The secularists maintain that we come from nothing and we are destined for annihilation, yet somehow in-between we are something special.  To paraphrase Francis Schaeffer, these secularists have both feet firmly planted in thin-air.</div>
<div>In Darwin's City there is an unholy trinity when it comes to man&mdash;he lives in a world without dignity, without truth, and without meaning.  How will human beings respond in such an environment?  Might they be corrupt in politics, dishonest in business, and boorish in entertainment?   If not accountable to a higher power, might they deem themselves accountable only to themselves? Would men like Jack Abramoff and businesses like Enron feel at home in such a place?</div>
<div>Juxtaposed against Darwin's city, there is the &quot;Shining City on the Hill,&quot; the one envisioned by Rev. John Winthrop in his famous 1630 sermon.  Residents of this place are convinced that, even though human beings are fallen in their nature, they enjoy a fundamental dignity because they are created in God's image.  They also have infinite worth because they have been redeemed &quot;with the precious blood of Christ...&quot; (1 Peter 1:19)  The Creator has endowed them with the inalienable rights of life and liberty.  This is the city of the American Founders.  It is the city envisioned by Abraham Lincoln when he said that &quot;this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom...&quot;  It is the city of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s dream, where he could say, &quot;Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!&quot;  It was the place Ronald Reagan said was &quot;a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace.&quot;  </div>
<div>Two different cities based on two different worldviews.  Which city will we choose to build? </div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4740</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4740</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Philadelphia 11 appeal free speech limits<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Ruling determined Christians have no right to speak at public event</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>A <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/StartzellAppeal.pdf">notice of appeal</a> has been filed with the 3rd U.S. Court of Appeals over actions by city officials in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.phila.gov/mayor/staff.html">Philadephia</a> who not only refused to protect the speech rights of 11 Christians at a public homosexual festival, but arrested them for quoting the Bible and speaking against the behavior.
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.alliancedefensefund.org">The Alliance Defense Fund</a> said it is appealing a judge's Jan. 19 dismissal of the group's federal court lawsuit against the city officials.
<div>&quot;Speech cannot be silenced simply because another person or group does not agree with it,&quot; said Ted Hoppe, an attorney allied with the ADF. &quot;City officials must be held accountable for their decision to violate the First Amendment rights of Christians who wanted nothing more than to engage in peaceful assembly on a public street.&quot;
<div>Members of the &quot;Philadelphia 11&quot; as the group has become known were arrested Oct. 10, 2004, after quoting the Bible and expressing their views against homosexual behavior on a public street during &quot;OutFest,&quot; a publicly funded celebration of homosexual choices.
<div>They were jailed overnight in the case, but a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.telladf.org/news/story.aspx?cid=3340">judge later dismissed any criminal counts</a> as having no basis in fact. The individuals then filed the damage lawsuit against the city.
<div>&quot;City officials must be held accountable for their decision to censor those who disagree with homosexual behavior,&quot; Hoppe said. &quot;All citizens are permitted by the Constitution to express their beliefs on a public street during a publicly funded event without fear of arrest.&quot;
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54235">As WND has just reported,</a> one of the members of the Philadelphia 11 is <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.repentamerica.com">Repent America director Michael Marcavage,</a> who said the precedent set by the dismissal would allow police to arrest anyone at any public gathering simply because they would have what the judge calls &quot;a contrary message.&quot;
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/directry/directry.pdf">U.S. District Judge Lawrence Stengel</a> had concluded in dismissing the civil rights claim that a &quot;permit&quot; granted by the city to the homosexuals allowed police to silence the Christian activists' message on public streets.
<div>&quot;It is without question that Judge Stengel's decision has set a precedent to eliminate the First Amendment rights of others by citing that a 'permitting scheme' can be used by police and event organizers to 'exclude persons expressing contrary messages' in public areas and at public events,&quot; Marcavage said.
<div>Rev. Ted Pike, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.truthtellers.org/">of the National Prayer Network,</a> said the dismissal of the civil rights complaint means that &quot;the Philly 11 were wrong in exercising free speech in what had become a no-free speech zone.&quot;
<div>He said the federal plan &quot;would eventually allow government 'thought police' to push aside states' rights in law enforcement. Such laws would allow federal indictment of Christian 'haters' in every state of the Union&hellip;&quot;
<div>&quot;It would become a federal crime &hellip; to show bias against protected groups [including] homosexuals. However, deviant groups such as witches, Satanists, pedophiles, abortionists, and even 'sinners' could quickly catch a ride on the bandwagon of federal protection from the 'hate' of biblically oriented criticism,&quot; he said.
<div>The decision by Stengel granted summary judgment to the city of Philadelphia and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.phillypride.org">&quot;Philly Pride Presents, Inc.&quot;</a>
<div>The judge couldn't escape the facts that &quot;the activity in question took place in a public forum,&quot; and &quot;there is no doubt that the venue for OutFest, a designated section of streets and sidewalks of Philadelphia, was a public place,&quot; but despite that he found that through the permit OutFest &quot;was empowered to enforce the permit by excluding persons expressing contrary messages.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4515</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4515</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">NARAL Targets Wal-Mart Pharmacists' Conscience Clause</font></strong></div>
<div>by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Let the retailer know you support its pro-life pharmacists.</em>
<div>
<div>NARAL Pro-Choice America has its sights set on Wal-Mart after a pharmacist told an Ohio woman he would not give her controversial emergency contraception.</div>
<div>Tashina Byrd said when she asked a Springfield pharmacist for the drug, he told her, &quot;We have it on hand, but there's no one here who can dispense it.&quot;</div>
<div>Emergency contraception, sold as &quot;Plan B,&quot; may cause an early abortion. </div>
<div>Brent Beams, the Wal-Mart pharmacist involved, said his job is to preserve life.</div>
<div>&quot;I do not believe in ending life,&quot; he said, &quot;and life begins at conception.&quot;</div>
<div>Byrd went to a different pharmacy to get the drug, then went to the media.</div>
<div>&quot;I could go to church if I wanted to be told how to live my life,&quot; she told The Associated Press.</div>
<div>NARAL is calling on its supporters to bombard Wal-Mart CEO H. Lee Scott with e-mail &quot;urging him to change company policy to guarantee that pharmacies fill requests for Plan B without delay.&quot;</div>
<div>Carrie Gordon Earll, senior analyst for bioethics at Focus on the Family Action, said NARAL is demonstrating that &quot;pro-choice&quot; only applies to those who agree with its political views.  </div>
<div>&quot;If you disagree, NARAL wants you to have 'no choice,' &quot; she said. &quot;Wal-Mart's conscientious-objection policy offers protection for pharmacists who have moral or religious concerns about dispensing this particular product -- a product that in some cases may cause an early abortion.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4514</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4514</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Homeschoolers fight bogus poisoning claim<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Another family accused of letting children 'eat Cheerios dry'</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>Arsenic and Christian music are two of more outlandish allegations that have been made against families whose children are homeschooled recently, according to an organization that monitors child protective services actions.
<div>The reports show that while both threats against the families were resolved to their benefit, the cases typify just how such problems can develop.
<div>According to the reports, from Thomas Dutkiewicz, of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.connecticutDCFwatch.com">www.ConnecticutDCFWatch.com,</a> the first case involved the Marrero family.
<div>They were shocked when a social worker from the local Division of Children and Family Services visited recently, informing the family only that he was investigating them for alleged abuse and neglect of their children.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>He later elaborated that he knew that the family's 12-year-old daughter had tested positive for abnormally high levels of arsenic. The family knew that, having just come from the office of a new doctor where the results were obtained. But since they knew arsenic wasn't present in their home, they had insisted on a new test already.
<div>The family let the social worker physically see the children, including the daughter, so he could confirm they were fine. But they declined to let him into their home for interviews with their children.
<div>As members of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.hslda.org">Home School Legal Defense Association,</a> which advocates for and advises homeschoolers worldwide, they contacted the organization and staff attorney Thomas Schmidt contacted the social worker with confirmation that the test results were anomalous because of a simple math error.
<div>No matter, said the social worker, the case will go on because of &quot;other&quot; allegations, which turned out to be claims of Munchausen by Proxy syndrome.
<div>&quot;Schmidt immediately wrote to the case worker and pointed out that the entire investigation was based on a lab error, and the HSLDA would have various doctors testify that all medical testing and evaluation of the children gave no evidence of Munchausen by Proxy,&quot; the organization said.
<div>Weeks later, and after contacting the social worker's supervisor, the case was closed, officials said.
<div>A second case arose a short time later, when a family, whose name was withheld, in the Port Huron, Mich., area was confronted by a social worker at their front door demanding entry.
<div>The social worker crumpled a document the mother handed her explaining why she wouldn't allow her entry into the home, then yelled that she would &quot;come in now&quot; and do a strip search of one of the children.
<div>The tirade had been triggered by an anonymous tipster, accusing the family of &quot;only allowing their two boys to listen to Christian music.&quot; The tipster also said the children &quot;ate their Cheerios dry&quot; and got nearly all their &quot;socialization through their church.&quot;
<div>The tipster also claimed the children were not in school, and two children, ages 10 and 14 &quot;were seen outside playing without adult supervision.&quot; Also, the tipster claimed, the mother &quot;pinched and hit her kids in church to keep them quiet.&quot;
<div>That was the reason for the demand for the strip search, according to www.ConnecticutDCFWatch.com.
<div>Once again, the HSLDA got involved. Chris Klicka wrote to the social worker addressing the rudeness and unprofessionalism of her visit. He also noted she obviously didn&rsquo;t receive her social worker training in the Fourth Amendment yet.
<div>HSLDA, 18 months earlier, had drafted and helped persuade legislators to pass a law requiring all social workers in Michigan to receive training in their &quot;duty to protect both statutory and constitutional rights of those being investigated.&quot;
<div>A statement from a local doctor indicated the children weren't abused, and other recommendations were documented about the parents' parenting abilities.
<div>Then the tipster struck again, and the social worker jumped into action, renewing her demands for a strip search of the children.
<div>When the social worker threatened she would seek a court order, Klicka noted that anonymous tips to not rise to the level of probable cause legally, so no court order was available.
<div>The family later was notified the investigation was being dropped. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4513</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4513</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Genetic Nondiscrimination Bill Would Not Cover Preborn Babies<br />
</strong>by Pete Winn, associate editor
<div><em>At issue is what constitutes a &quot;family member?&quot;</em></div>
<div>The House Education and Labor Committee considered a bill this afternoon that could subject some people to discrimination based on their genetic information -- the very thing it is supposed to prohibit.</div>
<div>Pro-life activists fear that, if approved, it could even encourage some women to have abortions.</div>
<div>Amanda Banks, federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said, at heart, H.R. 493, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), is &quot;well-intentioned and even necessary in today's marketplace.&quot;</div>
<div>It would prohibit insurers and employers from discriminating against individuals and their &quot;family members&quot; based on genetic information. </div>
<div>&quot;They could not use genetic information against an employee or a candidate,&quot; Banks said. &quot;For example, they couldn't deny health coverage because of something in their genetic information that is made available to the employer or health-insurance company.&quot;</div>
<div>But the bill contains two major loopholes.</div>
<div>&quot;The definition of 'family member' does not allow for inclusion of a preborn child,&quot; Banks said. &quot;It's also thought that the definition precludes children who are in the process of an adoption. It does include children who have already been adopted -- but not those in the process of adoption.&quot; </div>
<div>Cardinal Justin Rigali, a spokesman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said those loopholes could put pressure on women to abort -- or cancel adoptions -- if genetic testing revealed a child has special needs. </div>
<div>&quot;An insurance company could misuse knowledge of a child&rsquo;s genetic defect to raise a woman&rsquo;s premiums or cancel her insurance,&quot; Rigali said.</div>
<div>Reps. Peter Hoekstra and Tim Walberg, both Republicans from <span id="lw_1171543155_0">Michigan</span>, offered an amendment to close the loopholes. It failed, 20-27. </div>
<div>Dave Christensen, director of government affairs at the Family Research Council, said Committee Chairman George Miller, D-Calif., then introduced a provision that would protect &quot;the fetus&quot; in a pregnant mother.</div>
<div>&quot;That did not, however, include a child in the process of being adopted,&quot; Christensen said. &quot;Moreover, it would not include genetic tests done on embryos, say from the IVF clinic. It didn't go far enough, and there is still a loophole in this bill.&quot;</div>
<div>Christensen said the bill could be amended when it goes before two other House committees -- or once it reaches the floor of the House.</div>
<div>Without the needed changes, Banks said, the lives of preborn babies are at stake. </div>
<div>&quot;With Down-syndrome babies, the statistics show a diagnosis in utero results in abortion 92 percent of the time,&quot; she said. &quot;We want to encourage women and families to carry their babies to term.&quot;</div>
<div><strong>TAKE ACTION</strong><br />
Please contact your representative and ask him or her to support efforts to amend H.R. 493 to include protection for preborn babies and children in the adoption process.</div>
<div>If you are a CitizenLink Daily Update subscriber, click on the blue &quot;Take Action&quot; button in the e-mail to be automatically logged in to our Action Center. Otherwise, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/dotnet/WebPublish/controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&amp;Definition=Home&amp;XSL=Home&amp;SV_Section=Home"><font color="#003399">click on this link</font></a> .</div>
<div>If your representative voted in favor of the Hoekstra amendment, remember to express your thanks.</div>
<div>Voting in Favor:<br />
Democrats: <br />
Jason Altmire, Pa.<br />
Dale Kildee, <span id="lw_1171543155_1">Mich</span>.</div>
<div>Republicans: <br />
Rob Bishop, <span id="lw_1171543155_2">Utah</span><br />
Charles Boustany Jr., La.<br />
David <span id="lw_1171543155_3">Davis, Tenn</span>.<br />
Vernon J. Ehlers, <span id="lw_1171543155_4">Mich</span>.<br />
Luis G. Fortu&ntilde;o, P.R.<br />
Virginia Foxx, N.C.<br />
Peter Hoekstra, <span id="lw_1171543155_5">Mich</span>.<br />
Ric Keller, <span id="lw_1171543155_6">Fla</span>.<br />
John Kline, <span id="lw_1171543155_7">Mich</span>.<br />
Randy Kuhl Jr., N.Y.<br />
Kenny Marchant, <span id="lw_1171543155_8">Texas</span><br />
Buck McKeon, <span id="lw_1171543155_9">Calif</span>.<br />
Tom Petri, <span id="lw_1171543155_10">Wis</span>.<br />
Tom <span id="lw_1171543155_11">Price, Ga</span>.<br />
Cathy McMorris Rodgers, <span id="lw_1171543155_12">Wash</span>.<br />
Mark Souder, <span id="lw_1171543155_13">Ind</span>.<br />
Tim Walberg, <span id="lw_1171543155_14">Mich</span>. <br />
Joe Wilson, S.C.</div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4512</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4512</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Ranks of Renowned Scientists Doubting Darwin's Theory on the Rise - 700 Now on Public List</strong><br />
<br />
<div><span id="lw_1171543701_22">SEATTLE</span>, February 14, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Another 100 scientists have joined the ranks of scientists from around the world publicly stating their doubts about the adequacy of Darwin's theory of evolution. <br />
<br />
&quot;Darwinism is a trivial idea that has been elevated to the status of the scientific theory that governs modern biology,&quot; says dissent list signer Dr. Michael Egnor. Egnor is a professor of neurosurgery and pediatrics at State University of New York, Stony Brook and an award-winning brain surgeon named one of New York's best doctors by <span id="lw_1171543701_23">New York</span> Magazine. <br />
<br />
Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture announced last week that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution. The statement, located online at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/"><font color="#003399">http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org</font></a> , reads: &quot;We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.&quot; <br />
<br />
&quot;We know intuitively that Darwinism can accomplish some things, but not others,&quot; added Egnor. &quot;The question is what is that boundary? Does the information content in living things exceed that boundary? Darwinists have never faced those questions. They've never asked scientifically if random mutation and natural selection can generate the information content in living things.&quot; <br />
<br />
&quot;More scientists than ever before are now standing up and saying that it is time to rethink Darwin's theory of evolution in light of new scientific evidence that shows the theory is inadequate,&quot; said John West, associate director of the Center for Science &amp; Culture. &quot;Darwinists are busy making up holidays to turn Charles Darwin into a saint, even as the evidence supporting his theory crumbles and more and more scientific challenges to it emerge.&quot; <br />
<br />
The list of signatories includes member scientists from National Academies of Science in <span id="lw_1171543701_24">Russia</span>, <span id="lw_1171543701_25">Czech Republic</span>, <span id="lw_1171543701_26">Hungary</span>, India (Hindustan), <span id="lw_1171543701_27">Nigeria</span>, <span id="lw_1171543701_28">Poland</span>, and the <span id="lw_1171543701_29">United States</span>. Many of the signers are professors or researchers at major universities and international research institutions such as <span id="lw_1171543701_30">Cambridge University</span>, <span id="lw_1171543701_31">Moscow</span> State University, Chitose Institute of Science &amp; Technology in <span id="lw_1171543701_32">Japan</span>, Ben-Gurion University in Israel, MIT, The Smithsonian and Princeton.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4511</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4511</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Congressional Bill Could Force Abortions, Hurt Family's Adoptions</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
February 14</em><em>, 2007</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>Members of Congress and leading pro-life groups are worried about a bill that could be used to coerce women to have abortions and make adoptive families terminate an adoption process. They warn the measure could lead to discrimination against individuals and families on the basis of the genetic information.
<div>The House Education and Labor Committee will be considering H.R. 493, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act on Wednesday.</div>
<div>Pro-life advocates warn that the bill could lead to discrimination against individuals and families on the basis of the genetic information of preimplantation or prenatal genetic testing or genetic testing on an adoptive child before the adoption is completed. </div>
<div>Pro-life lawmakers are hoping to get language included in the bill to close the loophole and, if that's not successful, they plan to offer an amendment today to fix the problem.</div>
<div>Leading organizations such as the Family Research Council and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops are lobbying members of the committee to adopt the changes.</div>
<div>They say that if this loophole is not closed, women who choose to carry their child to term despite tests that show a genetic predisposition to particular ailments could be discriminated against by employers and insurance providers.</div>
<div>&quot;Unfortunately, due to a large loophole in the bill's language, the definition of 'family member' does not include children who are 'to be born' or those who are in the process of being placed for adoption,&quot; says Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council.</div>
<div>&quot;Without an amendment to expand the definition, an insurance company could, on the grounds of a prenatal test, cancel a woman's insurance -- or encourage her to have an abortion because it doesn't want to pay for the costs of a special needs child with an illness or disability such as Down Syndrome,&quot; Perkins added.</div>
<div>When the bill was first introduced in 2005, sponsors said the language would be clarified. However, with the House now poised to act on the legislation, this has not been done.</div>
<div>Related web sites:<br />
Family Research Council - <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frc.org/">http://www.frc.org</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Printed from: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2931.html">http://www.lifenews.com/nat2931.html</a></em><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4510</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4510</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>   </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">Set the Right Financial Foundation for Your Marriage</font></strong></div>
<div><strong><font size="4">Cara Davis</font></strong></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><font size="2">Holly Ordway is a thirty-year-old technical writer in San Diego who lives on less than $35,000 a year. With a husband. And a cat. Collectively, they make a six-figure income (except for the cat) but choose to live beneath their means, stay debt-free, and save.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">She was labeled an &quot;extreme saver&quot; by CNN, who profiled her story. Ordway had about $10,000 in school loans that she paid off in one year. She and her husband opt to rent instead of pay a mortgage so they can move about the country at will.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">She has no tricks, gimmicks, or trendy ways of generating cash. She simply spends as little as possible and saves the rest. But theirs is not a miserly existence. She&rsquo;s an avid fencer who competes on a national level. The couple&rsquo;s apartment sports a home theater system with a large-screen television and surround sound to accompany their two hundred-plus DVD collection. Sound frivolous? Ordway reviews DVDs for an online website that sends her the movies for free. What she doesn&rsquo;t review she picks up with her $25 worth of points she earns each month paying her expenses on an Amazon.com Visa card (which the couple pays off each month). They have only one car and choose to live near one partner&rsquo;s workplace for a driveless commute.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Ordway says there&rsquo;s no formula or secret method to living beneath your means. &quot;It&rsquo;s all about having the right principles and putting them into action on a day-to-day basis,&quot; she told CNN. &quot;It&rsquo;s like losing weight: there&rsquo;s no real quick-fix diet that works in the long run. You might shed a few pounds with the fad diet du jour, but to keep the weight off, the only method that works reliably is no secret: a healthy, varied diet with minimal processed foods and plenty of exercise.&quot;</font></div>
<div><font size="2">She admits that&rsquo;s a bitter pill for many people to swallow. &quot;We all want quick fixes, and it can be hard to face up to the fact that if we want to change for the better, it&rsquo;s a long-term process.&quot; That long-term process doesn&rsquo;t have to be painful. &quot;I don&rsquo;t think most people quite realize the payoff that you get from living below your means,&quot; she continues. &quot;Because of my good spending habits, I can afford to pay for the things I really enjoy, and I don&rsquo;t have to feel guilty or anxious about it. It&rsquo;s not about suffering ... not at all! But that idea runs so much in counter to mainstream ideas about saving and spending (as captured in the phrase &lsquo;scrimping and saving&rsquo;) that it seems like I must have a &lsquo;secret.&rsquo;&quot;</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Ordway writes about spending, saving, investing, and living simply on her website/blog, Spending Wisely (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.spendingwisely.com/">www.spendingwisely.com</a>). She regularly reviews books on finance and writes articles full of tips on living beneath your means. As you go from your dream wedding to setting up your household, here are some ways she purports you can change your lifestyle and actually enjoy the benefits money can bring.</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><strong>It&rsquo;s not having what you want, but wanting what you have.</strong> Regularly take inventory of your possessions. Clean out your closets and sell or donate anything you don&rsquo;t use on a regular basis or won&rsquo;t need in case of an emergency. If you registered for items you don&rsquo;t need, take them back before you use them. Use the cash or store credit on something you do need.</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><strong>Don&rsquo;t compare yourselves to others, as the Bible wisely instructs.</strong> Expensive and new stuff does not make happy couples, no matter what your neighbors or friends look like. The ideal American couple with a newer model car, gas-guzzling SUV, three-bedroom home, two kids, and a vacation timeshare in Orlando is probably up to their ears in debt. Be content with what you have and don&rsquo;t let the pressure of marketers tell you you&rsquo;re living less than the abundant life God promises you.</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><strong>Think before you buy.</strong> Living beneath your means simply means knowing the difference between your wants and needs and spending accordingly. Before you buy, ask yourself these questions:</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Is it necessary?</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Can I afford it?</font></div>
<div><font size="2">What&rsquo;s this new thing really costing me?</font></div>
<div><font size="2">You can apply this principle all the way down to the coffee you buy each day at the gas station on the way to work. Why not invest in a nice coffeemaker and have it brewing when you wake up each morning? Pennies on coffee beat a buck and change each day over the duration of a year.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">When it comes to buying bigger items, splurge on what you truly want and will use instead of the latest item featured in the Pottery Barn catalog. Remember you can often find great deals at flea markets, garage sales, discount stores, and consignment shops.</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><strong>Avoiding Extremes</strong></font></div>
<div><font size="2">The Bible says to let your moderation be known (Phil. 4:5). So while you pursue a simple lifestyle, don&rsquo;t go overboard. Try implementing one step at a time. Clean out your closets one month. Start trimming your grocery and eating-out costs the next. Bargain hunt for that new sofa you need. Don&rsquo;t rush into a decision.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">With anything, you can go nuts and create an unrealistic, legalistic set of rules to live by. You&rsquo;ll crash and burn in no time. The point is to think about how you spend your money and to prioritize what&rsquo;s important in your new life together as a married couple. Talk to each other regularly about your spending, your new lifestyle, and your dreams. Put away money to fund those dreams and don&rsquo;t let the little daily expenses rob you of them.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">I have subscribed to a number of my favorite stores or companies&rsquo; mailing lists to receive notices of sales and deals and to take advantage of mailing list coupons. This works out great most of the time. The only problem is I get weekly emails from the companies, and each seems to have a deal of the season every week. I&rsquo;ve got to use my head. If I know I&rsquo;m going to need some new threads, I&rsquo;ll check out that newsletter. If the deal is sweet enough, I&rsquo;ll think about it. If I don&rsquo;t need any house ware items, I&rsquo;m not even going to open it.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">It&rsquo;s easy to get addicted to finding deals and bargains. Anyone who&rsquo;s shopped on eBay knows this. I could look at stuff on eBay for hours and not even get up to go to the bathroom. Similarly, deals found online may seem like ones you need to jump on immediately before they pass, but chances are you&rsquo;ll find deals like that every day if you check. There will always be another airfare sale, end-of-the season bonanza, or limited-time combination deal.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">The key is to keep a list (mental or physical) of items you need and only hunt for those. Limit the time you search for these to your lunch hour or the time you&rsquo;re waiting on your spouse to come home from work. Time is money, too, so the time you waste scouring the web for stuff you don&rsquo;t need is time away from setting up your new life together. It&rsquo;s not worth it.<br />
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4508</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4508</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Scholars Mull Founders' View of Religion in Public Life<br />
</strong><font size="3">By Kevin Mooney <br />
CNSNews.com Staff Writer<br />
February 05, 2007<br />
<br />
<strong>Virginia Beach (CNSNews.com)</strong> - America's founding fathers championed a prominent public role for religion in politics that contrasts with the secular impulses dominating contemporary society, according to several scholars who took part in a symposium here honoring President Ronald Reagan.<br />
<br />
George Washington &quot;audaciously challenged the patriotism of those in society who sought to undermine religion or its public role,&quot; argued Daniel Dreisbach, a professor in the school of public affairs at the American University.<br />
<br />
Dreisbach told audience members at the seminar hosted by Regent University that Washington's view of religion and its proper station in public life would greatly antagonize secular forces in America today. <br />
<br />
&quot;One can easily imagine the scorn the mainstream media would heap on the original George W,&quot; he said. <br />
<br />
Washington's &quot;<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ushistory.org/valleyforge/washington/earnestprayer.html">Circular Letter</a>&quot; of 1783, announcing his resignation as commander and chief, and his <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/49.htm">&quot;Farewell Address&quot;</a> in 1796 provide a complete picture of his &quot;core political beliefs,&quot; Dreisbach explained. Because he did not anticipate returning to public life as president, the two documents can be viewed as farewell statements to the nation.<br />
<br />
Washington's acknowledgements of God and divine intervention in the affairs of nations were not preserved for private musings or obscure missives - rather, they were central to his most important public addresses, Dreisbach said.<br />
<br />
The &quot;indispensable&quot; role of religion in America's constitutional order and its connection with public virtue were widely recognized by Washington and other prominent figures of his day, Dreisbach contended.<br />
<br />
In Oct. 1782, for example, the Continental Congress issued a Thanksgiving Proclamation that most likely was authored by John Witherspoon, a Presbyterian clergyman who signed the Declaration of Independence.<br />
<br />
Dreisbach singled out a passage from Washington's farewell address to bolster his point: &quot;Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens.&quot;<br />
<br />
That portion of the speech is rarely invoked and often overlooked, Dreisbach observed. <br />
<br />
&quot;This is pretty stunning language,&quot; he said. &quot;He seems to be coming close to saying that if you're undermining the public role of religion, you can't call yourself a patriot -- indeed, you may be a traitor to the polity.&quot; <br />
<br />
Some have speculated that Washington may have been referring to Thomas Jefferson, who is widely viewed as being less pious than many of the other founders. <br />
<br />
But Jean Bethke Elshtain, a professor at the University of Chicago and another forum participant, noted that Jefferson -- ironically -- would be viewed today as someone with strong religious convictions.<br />
<br />
Elshtain argued that the institutional separation of church and state should not be seen as justification for the secularization of society at large.<br />
<br />
Other speakers included Hadley Arkes, author and Amherst College professor, who discussed the influence of natural law on America's founding, its relationship with freedom and the &quot;immutable&quot; moral code that pre-exists civil society.<br />
<br />
Arkes also discussed the rationale some federalists such as Alexander Hamilton had for opposing the inclusion of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution. Hamilton was reluctant to embrace the first ten amendments because he feared that explicitly writing them out would leave any unmentioned rights unprotected, he said.<br />
<br />
The caliber of the presentations greatly impressed Josh Bachman, a first year law student at the university. &quot;Keep feeding me the red meat,&quot; he said. &quot;The founders took deliberate steps to protect our natural rights and my generation needs to re-discover the philosophical roots of American exceptionalism.&quot;<br />
<br />
John Beutel, a government student, told <strong>Cybercast News Service</strong> he particularly enjoyed the lecture given by Michael Novak of the American Enterprise Institute, who highlighted the connection between Christian theology and the language used in early American documents, such as the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gunstonhall.org/documents/vdr.html">Virginia Declaration of Rights </a>.<br />
<br />
Novak said the definition of religion used in the Virginia Declaration helped set tone for religious freedom, which was ultimately followed throughout the nation.<br />
<br />
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4311</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4311</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Colts' coach more proud of Christ than 'blackness'<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">When asked about social significance of Dungy's victory, Jesus is answer</font><br />
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Joe Kovacs<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>Super Bowl XLI had been hyped as a major social milestone in U.S. history, since for the time, the head coaches of both teams were black.
<div>But when the game was over and the Indianapolis Colts had defeated the Chicago Bears 29-17, the winning coach said Jesus Christ was more important than any racial moment.
<div>During the nationally televised post-game show on CBS, coach Tony Dungy was asked specifically about the &quot;social significance.&quot;
<div><blockquote><strong>Jim Nantz of CBS Sports:</strong> This is one of those moments, Tony, where there is also social significance in this victory, and to have your hands on the Vince Lombardi Trophy. Tell me what this means to you right now.
<div><strong>Tony Dungy:</strong> I'll tell you what. I'm proud to be representing African-American coaches, to be the first African-American to win this. It means an awful lot to our country. But again, more than anything, I've said it before, Lovie Smith and I, not only the first two African-Americans, but Christian coaches showing that you can win doing it the Lord's way. And we're more proud of that.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>The <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/02/04/D8N3ADSO0.html">Associated Press</a> reported Dungy's comments about God in stories it moved on its wire service, but the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601079&amp;sid=aI_L4N_jxRnY&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News Service</a> only published the portion regarding African-Americans, and edited out the mention of Christian coaches.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>Colts' owner Jim Irsay credited God with the victory as he held the sparkling Vince Lombardi trophy in his hands.
<div>&quot;Now there's an awful lot of shining glory, even more than last time up here,&quot; Irsay said. &quot;But we're giving it all to God again because that's what got us here ... sticking together and believing that we could, and I know God has looked after us on this journey and bonded us into such a tight family.&quot;
<div>Dungy has had a close relationship with Bears' head coach Lovie Smith since 1996, when Dungy hired Smith to coach linebackers for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
<div>&quot;My relationship, first, is with Jesus Christ, and he is the center of my life,&quot; said Smith when asked about his faith earlier this week. &quot;I try to live a Christian life. I would like for players to know my faith based on what they see on a day-to-day basis.&quot;
<div>CBS anchor James Brown, himself a strong believer in Jesus Christ, told the Baptist Press this year's Super Bowl could be a welcome change in a sport that hasn't had that many Christian players and announcers in the past.
<div>&quot;Personally, I'm gratified to see that change,&quot; Brown said. &quot;I think their faith is a wonderful example to see and I think both men are sterling examples of what character coaches should be. That's what we should be promoting.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4310</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4310</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="4">Papers Reveal Plans for 'North American Union'</font>
<div>
<div>A government watchdog is calling for more transparency in talks between U.S., Canadian and Mexican officials who are discussing a &quot;vision of North America&quot; that some critics worry are the first step toward a North American Union.
<div>Judicial Watch this week released documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request that include U.S. officials' notes from the North American Forum, a September 2006 meeting with Canadian and Mexican officials that explored ways to create &quot;genuine partnerships.&quot;
<div>That meeting followed the March 2005 creation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), which the U.S. government calls a &quot;trilateral effort to increase security and enhance prosperity among the United States, Canada and Mexico through greater cooperation and information sharing.&quot;
<div>Several points of discussion at the September meeting worried Judicial Watch, most notably a note in one set of documents referring to &quot;evolution by stealth.&quot; The discussions also touched on integration of energy supply, easing immigration among the three countries and closing the &quot;income gap&quot; between Mexico and the U.S. and Canada.
<div>&quot;I don't know that there's an appreciation or an understanding that this is what the American government is busy spending its time doing,&quot; Chris Farrell, Judicial Watch's director of research and investigation, told Cybercast News Service.
<div>&quot;I think it's curious ... when they advocate in their own documents that a position of stealth should be adopted in trying to integrate the three countries,&quot; Farrell said. &quot;That's rather extraordinary.&quot;
<div>The group released documents from the meeting, including some handwritten notes taken by participant Deborah Bolton, a political advisor for U.S. Northern Command. Also included in the notes is a paper by Robert Pastor, the director of American University's Center for North American Studies.
<div>&quot;Our purpose is to build a greater sense of being a part of North America,&quot; Pastor wrote. &quot;We do not want to displace the pride each of us feels in our countries, but rather to supplement that with a feeling of being North American.&quot;
<div>Pastor recommended some questions for discussion including, &quot;Should a new transportation corridor be designed and built between Canada and Mexico?&quot; and &quot;Should there be a North American Passport to facilitate travel within the three countries?&quot;
<div>Those kinds of proposals worry some conservatives, who fear that increased cooperation with its North American neighbors will harm United States sovereignty and lead to the creation of a North American version of the European Union.
<div>According to Pastor, those critics have &quot;nothing to fear,&quot; because he said none of the countries are taking the discussions seriously.
<div>&quot;There's a conspiratorial mood among certain groups out there that are trying to make it sound like as if this conference was more than just a conference, that somehow or other it set the agenda for the three governments,&quot; he told Cybercast News Service.
<div>&quot;I wish that were the case, frankly, that the three governments would take seriously some of the issues that were being discussed, but none of them are.&quot;
<div>Pastor said that &quot;those who are fearful that somehow this conference is creating a vast new agenda have nothing to fear. Those who are hopeful that we may approach our neighbors in more constructive ways have more reason to be frustrated.&quot;
<div>He said the secrecy surrounding the meetings was a &quot;mistake&quot; and that he favored issuing a statement and report on the discussions, &quot;but the three leaders who organized it thought that it would be a more productive discussion if the participants were not quoted and could express their views without fear of being distorted.&quot;
<div>Pastor is also an author of the Council of Foreign Relations' May 2005 report called &quot;Building a North American Community.&quot; The report is at the center of critics' fears that the goal of the SPP and North American Forum is a political union.
<div>&quot;The global challenges faced by North America cannot be met solely through unilateral or bilateral efforts or existing patterns of cooperation,&quot; the report states. &quot;They require deepened cooperation based on the principle ... that 'our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.&quot;
<div>Supporters of the report's recommendations point to the fact that it says a North American community &quot;should rely more on the market and less on bureaucracy, more on pragmatic solutions to shared problems than on grand schemes of confederation or union, such as those in Europe.&quot;
<div>
<div>
<div>&copy; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/">CNS News.com</a>. All rights reserved. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4309</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4309</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="4">Literal interpretation of Bible is illustrated</font></strong></div>
<font size="+0"><strong>By Michele Clock</strong>
<div> </div>
</font><font size="+0">UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
<div> </div>
</font><font size="+0">February 3, 2007
<div> </div>
</font><font size="+0">SANTEE &ndash; Leafy, plastic vines climb the walls. Fake tree branches dangle overhead. The piped-in sound of croaking frogs fills the air.
<div>Windows in the walls give a view to colorful finches, a shiny scorpion, even a python named Cuddles.</div>
</font>This lush, gardenlike room is part of the Museum of Creation and Earth History, a beige, two-story structure that brings to life a version of history that isn't taught in public schools. Here, God created Earth as described in the Bible.
<div>Each year, about 15,000 visitors come to Santee's only museum, deemed the world's largest creationist museum by the Northwest Creation Network. (A much larger, $27 million creationist museum under construction in Kentucky will soon snatch the title.)</div>
<div>Folks may say they believe in evolution, but they don't really buy that humans came from other creatures, said John D. Morris, president of the Institute for Creation Research, which runs the free-admission museum.</div>
<div>&ldquo;You cannot convince a kid they came from a fish,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Kids know better and people know better.&rdquo;</div>
<div>A group of uniformed parochial school students was an eager audience at the museum one recent weekday morning. A chorus of &ldquo;whoas&rdquo; and &ldquo;wows&rdquo; followed as they wandered into the gardenlike room, which is devoted to Days 5, 6 and 7 of creation.
<div>Caleb Barrera, 8, a second-grader at Chula Vista's Berean Bible Baptist Church and Academy, moved his little camera as close as he could to the critters, snapping photo after photo. Bible in hand, first-grader Matthew Fernandez, 6, tugged fifth-grader Anthony Diez, 10, toward an exhibit crawling with cockroaches.</div>
<div>Soon it was time for museum curator Cindy Carlson to bring out Cuddles.</div>
<div>&ldquo;He won't bite,&rdquo; she assured. With the brown-and-black snake perched on her arm, she asked the students, &ldquo;Who made snakes?&rdquo;</div>
<div>&ldquo;God!&rdquo; they shouted.</div>
<div><strong><font size="3">No government funding</font></strong></div>
Just down the street from the Santee Drive In Theatre and a stone's throw from an auto-body shop, the businesslike building seems an unusual place to tackle such questions as, &ldquo;What is the meaning of life?&rdquo; and, &ldquo;Where did I come from?&rdquo;
<div>A member of the institute's board sold this chunk of East County to the institute in the 1980s. Today, the two office buildings there serve as headquarters for the institute, its graduate school and the museum.</div>
<div>A walk through the museum starts and ends in a small bookstore stocked with not-so-subtle titles such as &ldquo;God Created the Plants &amp; Trees of the World&rdquo; and &ldquo;Refuting Evolution.&rdquo; A sign at the start of the tour states that the museum accepts no government funding. It isn't affiliated with any church, either.</div>
Visitors step from the green-hued garden room into the reddish-orange glare of &ldquo;The Fall of Man.&rdquo; There, a human skull and a preserved tarantula are on display. A tiger painted on the wall bares its teeth as if poised to attack. The sorrowful cries of a man and baby waft overhead.
<div>The next room evokes the inside of Noah's Ark. A floor-to-ceiling mural shows animals standing in pens. The sounds of cracking thunder and pouring rain can be heard, and a flashing light simulates lightning.</div>
<div>Noah didn't need to load the largest animals into the ark, a plaque reads. He could have collected &ldquo;young virile specimens&rdquo; instead, which could have allowed 50,000 animals to squeeze on board.</div>
<div>Near the end of the tour, a drawing of a healthy, green &ldquo;Creationist Tree&rdquo; is juxtaposed near a twisted &ldquo;Evolutionary Tree.&rdquo; Written next to the creationist tree: &ldquo;Genuine Christianity&rdquo; and &ldquo;Correct Practices.&rdquo; The evolutionary tree: &ldquo;Harmful Philosophies&rdquo; and &ldquo;Evil Practices,&rdquo; including promiscuity, pornography, genocide, slavery and abortion.</div>
<div><strong><font size="3">Father of creationism</font></strong></div>
The museum has been around almost as long as the Institute for Creation Research, founded by Morris' late father, Henry Morris, in 1970. It moved to its current location in the mid-1980s.
<div>Morris is credited with helping to spark a modern creationist movement after co-writing the 1961 book &ldquo;The Genesis Flood.&rdquo; The work tried to scientifically explain the theory of divine creation.</div>
<div>The movement has grown from very few followers when the book was published to &ldquo;tens of thousands&rdquo; today, John Morris said, citing polls that show most Americans believe God had some hand in creation.</div>
<div>Morris, who has led expeditions to Turkey's Mount Ararat in search of Noah's Ark, said his father convinced many that creationism was true. John Morris now travels the country making the case for divine creation and against evolution.</div>
<div>From its Santee home, the institute also spreads its message across the world through pamphlets, radio programs broadcast by 1,500 radio stations worldwide, and a 113,000-circulation monthly newsletter.</div>
<div><strong><font size="3">Popular with students</font></strong></div>
Students on field trips and Bible study groups are among those who visit the museum most.
<div>Berean Bible Baptist Academy student Erika Fernandez, 8, said she liked the room with live animals because her favorite parts of the Bible describe how God made them.</div>
<div>&ldquo;No one can make any animal but him,&rdquo; she said.</div>
<div>The school's principal, Melito Barrera, said he doesn't worry about the children getting mixed messages about creation and evolution from society.</div>
<div>He points to a nearby corridor in the museum, where photos of creationist scholars hang opposite those of evolutionist scholars. On the evolutionist side, Andrew Carnegie is described as &ldquo;cruel and heartless in his own day to competitors and laborers alike.&rdquo; He's joined by Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler, among others.</div>
<div>&ldquo;That's what makes it very clear,&rdquo; Barrera said. &ldquo;There's no gray area. It's teaching them the truth so that they will know what is in error.&rdquo;</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4308</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4308</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="4">Child's 'Jesus' drawing crux of federal lawsuit</font></strong></div>
<div id="entry-1037">
<div>
<div>Allie Martin and Jody Brown<br />
<small><a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 1, 2007</font></small>  <br />
<br />
<img alt="Antonio Peck poster-small" />
<div>All Antonio Peck wanted to do was to show that his faith in Jesus played a  part in his concern for the environment. But the poster he drew caught the  attention of school officials, who decided that the &quot;Jesus&quot; half of the poster  needed to be folded under before it went on display. Now a judge gets to decide  if the school violated the young child's constitutional right to religious  expression.</div>
<strong></strong><br />
</div>
<div id="more">
<div>A federal judge will decide whether a public school in New York state was  justified when it censored a kindergartner's art poster containing a picture of  Jesus.</div>
<div>In 1999, Antonio Peck, then a kindergarten student in the Baldwinsville  School District, was instructed by his teacher to draw a poster about how to  save the environment. His first poster was rejected because it contained several  religious figures. </div>
<div><img alt="Antonio Peck poster" /></div>
<div>Antonio's second poster included figures of children holding hands, people  recycling trash, and a picture of Jesus. The poster was displayed in the school  cafeteria, but school officials folded the poster in half so the figure of  Christ could not be seen.</div>
<div><img alt="Antonio Peck poster censored by school officials" /></div>
<div>A lawsuit was filed and a federal judge has heard the case. Mat Staver,  founder of <a href="http://www.lc.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Liberty  Counsel</a>, the legal group which filed the lawsuit, says the school sent a  terrible message to Antonio and other students.</div>
<div>&quot;They took the position that they would establish a religion by merely  posting a picture of Jesus [drawn] by a kindergarten student among 80-plus  posters during a 40-minute presentation,&quot; he says. According to Staver, the  school's stance was essentially that Jesus &quot;had to be cleansed&quot; from the  presentation.</div>
<div>The case is a blatant example of viewpoint discrimination, says the  attorney. &quot;There are some school officials who take a very radical position  against religion and assume that any kind of religious expression -- even if  it's by students -- has to be censored,&quot; Staver explains. &quot;That doesn't make  sense; and in fact, it's unconstitutional.&quot;</div>
<div>A Liberty Counsel press release on the case reports that a newspaper report  on the matter brought unexpected exposure to the second poster. The story run by  a New York newspaper carried images of both the folded and unfolded versions of  the poster. When asked by a reporter how he felt about the story, Antonio  replied: &quot;Happy. Now my poster is not folded.&quot;</div>
<div>Liberty Counsel calls it &quot;ironic&quot; and notes that because of the school's  decision and the subsequent newspaper report, Antonio's poster was viewed by  many more people than would have seen it had not been &quot;censored&quot; in the first  place. &quot;Many people have had the opportunity to hear about Jesus from this  little boy and his parents because they were willing to take a stand for what is  right,&quot; states the release.</div>
<div>The case, <em>Baldwinsville School District v. Peck</em>, is now in the  hands of a federal judge, and Staver expects a ruling sometime this  spring.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4268</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4268</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Poor Darwin's false religion<br />
</font>
<div>
<div><font>By Pat Boone<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2007  </font>
<div>
<div>There it was, glinting in the sand, something catching the searing  sub-Saharan sun. The half conscious, desperately thirsty British airman first  thought he was hallucinating. As he staggered toward the shiny object, he prayed  it was something liquid, something that would cool his parched throat. But it  wasn't; as he grasped it in his hand and shook the sand away, he realized he was  holding a watch.
<div>A watch!
<div>And not just a watch; soon after, when he'd been rescued and returned to  England, he showed it to his superior officers and then to scientific experts.  At first, no one could identify the maker or even how old the timepiece was.  Nothing quite like it had ever been seen. It was fashioned of finest 24-karat  gold, the design magnificent, the face a gloriously transparent crystal, the  wristband intricate and obviously very expensive. And the most amazing feature:  The sweep second hand was moving gracefully in one fluid motion around the Roman  numerals &ndash; keeping absolutely perfect time &ndash; and it seemed to need no winding or  even motion to keep it running!
<div><em>(Column continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>Eventually, Darwinian scientists concluded that this exquisite artifact had  not been manufactured; it had <em>evolved</em>, starting as a primitive sun dial  from prehistoric times, swept and carried along and burnished by howling winds  and abrasive sands, colliding over the millennia with other whirling objects and  substances, melting and freezing and morphing finally into this magnificent  timepiece, purely by happenstance. And, because of its primary ingredients and  millennial buffeting by the elements, it now was so in tune with the universe  that it kept atomic clock-type time!
<div>Anybody gullible enough to believe that sappy saga? No? Well, how about one  even more farfetched and absurd?
<div>The vast universe, operating in such dependable precision we can  confidently send human beings a quarter million miles into space, all the way to  the surface of the moon, and back, safely. Our earth, moving in quiet orbit  around the sun, so perfectly placed that life of all kinds flourish, while just  a little distance closer or farther away, and the globe would not support life  at all. And the human body, to say nothing of the mysterious brain, is made of  such a myriad collection of mechanisms and infinitesimal organisms, all  functioning in unexplainable synchronicity, that all the scientists who've ever  lived have yet to understand more than a fraction of its workings. And all of  this just &quot;happened.&quot; No blueprint, no design, no intelligence, no creator or  creation process. Just blind chance, and something called &quot;evolution.&quot;
<div>As absurd, as nonsensical as this concept is, it's being swallowed whole  and taught to our kids by college-educated, highly intelligent professors,  encouraged by the National Education Association and militantly defended by the  ACLU. Not one of these Ph.D.s can explain what started it all, where the mass  and energy (the basic ingredients of which all things consist) began or came  from. They posit a &quot;primordial ooze,&quot; little one-celled organisms, some  cataclysmic &quot;big bang&quot; explosion from which our unfathomable universe was  created, and buy into a fantastic theory in which millions of life forms  &quot;evolved&quot; into what we now see all around us &ndash; and apparently on only this one  relatively small rock in all of space. Nowhere else.
<div>And not one Ph.D. I've ever heard &ndash; totally aware of one of the basic laws  of science, &quot;every action creates an equal and opposite reaction&quot; &ndash; can hope to  explain what the &quot;action&quot; was that created the &quot;equal and opposite reaction&quot; we  call <em>matter</em>.
<div>In his wonderful book, &quot;Darwin's Black Box,&quot; author Michael Behe details  the current &quot;biochemical challenge to evolution.&quot; As true science has developed  and modern technology is ever more able to peer deeply into the whirling  universe of subatomic particles, the concept that life marched forward, mutation  by mutation, from &quot;simple&quot; cell to complex organism has been knocked into the  proverbial cocked hat. There is no &quot;simple&quot; cell, and never has been. Behe  describes, even depicts, the &quot;irreducible complexity&quot; of the most microscopic  living cell, which is in itself enormously complex and <em>populated</em> by  intricate <em>sub</em>systems &ndash; all necessary for cell function.
<div>The more powerful and probing our microscopes become, the more diverse and  dizzyingly complicated the simplest building blocks become; each is a tiny  pulsing universe in itself!
<div>Consider this. In 1925, in the infamous Scopes &quot;Monkey Trial,&quot; ACLU  attorney Clarence Darrow took the position that <em>it was bigotry</em> to teach  just one view of human origins! He was defending the right of the science  teacher to offer the theory of evolution as an alternative to the long-accepted  account of creation. And now, that same ACLU is instituting lawsuits all over  America wherever anybody dares to offer Intelligent Design or any other  alternative to the theory of evolution! What blatant hypocrisy!
<div>Here's one more pertinent consideration, never reported by the most devoted  Darwinian: Charles Darwin's own statements, especially as he approached his own  demise. Earlier in his life, he openly acknowledged &quot;the extreme difficulty or  rather <em>impossibility</em> of conceiving this immense and wonderful universe &hellip;  as the result of blind chance or necessity.&quot; His subsequent disciples evidently  dismiss that thought. Doesn't fit the &quot;theory.&quot;
<div>But in a fascinating book, John Myers' &quot;Voices from the Edge of Eternity,&quot;  we find the detailed personal account of Lady Hope, of Northfield, England, who  visited the aging scientist often at his bedside during his last days. It's too  long to recount well here, but she tells of the Bible he was reading constantly  and of the worship services that took place regularly in the summerhouse in his  garden. She says that when she brought up the controversy still raging between  believers in the Genesis account of creation and the growing group of scientists  and teachers dismissing that account in favor of his &quot;The Origin of Species&quot; and  related theories, he seemed distressed. And &quot;a look of agony came over his face  as he said 'I was a young man with unformed ideas. I threw out queries,  suggestions, wondering all the time about everything. To my astonishment the  ideas took like wildfire. People made a religion of them.'&quot;
<div>Exactly.
<div>Charles Darwin may have birthed flawed theories, but in this case he proved  prophetic.
<div>Now, Dr. Jonathan Wells states flatly, &quot;I think in 50 years, Darwinian  evolution will be gone from the science curriculum. People will look back on it  and ask how anyone could, in their right mind, have believed this, because it's  so implausible when you look at the evidence.&quot;
<div>But 50 years could be enough to destroy the faith of two generations of our  young, enough to replace it with a bankrupt false religion. Will we have the  courage, the gumption, to make sure that doesn't happen? </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4267</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4267</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<h3><strong>North Carolina Family Policy Council</strong></h3>
</div>
<div>A proposal sent forward by a state legislative study commission last week  could undermine adoption in North Carolina and place an undue burden on adoptive  families. On Friday, January 19, the Joint Legislative Study Commission on  Children and Youth voted to approve a recommendation to the 2007 North Carolina  General Assembly that would make &ldquo;post-adoption contact agreements&rdquo; legally  binding. These agreements outline forms of contact or communication that may  take place between the family of an adopted child and that child&rsquo;s biological  mother, father, siblings, etc. While such agreements already may be entered into  voluntarily under North Carolina law, the Commission&rsquo;s proposal would formalize  the agreements and make them legally enforceable.</div>
<div>&ldquo;Making these agreements legally binding would represent a significant  shift in North Carolina&rsquo;s adoption policy,&rdquo; said John Rustin, director of  government relations for the North Carolina Family Policy Council, who testified  before the Commission on Friday. &ldquo;This proposal, if enacted, would blur the  legal rights of adoptive parents and could expose the adoptive family to ongoing  disruption and discord,&rdquo; Rustin continued.</div>
<div>In order to foster stability in the adoptive family, North Carolina&rsquo;s law  recognizes that, &ldquo;A decree of adoption severs the relationship of parent and  child between the individual adopted and that individual&rsquo;s biological or  previous adoptive parents&hellip;the former parents are divested of all rights with  respect to the adoptee.&rdquo; The N.C. Court of Appeals has ruled that adoptive  parents have the &ldquo;prerogative to determine with whom their children shall  associate.&rdquo; Granting biological family members the right to sue for enforcement  of post-adoption contact agreements would contradict these laws and could force  adoptive parents to cede their rights to the courts and to members of the  biological family.</div>
<div>&ldquo;Adoptive parents and members of an adoptee&rsquo;s biological family can already  enter into these agreements on a voluntary basis, and some do. However, if the  relationship between the adoptive family and the biological family member sours  or the adoptive parents find that the relationship is no longer in the best  interest of their family and the child, then they should retain full authority  over the relationship and have the ability to sever the agreement free from the  burden and cost of defending themselves in court,&rdquo; Rustin concluded.</div>
<div>During Commission debate, State Senator Doug Berger (D-Franklin)  recommended limiting the applicability of the proposal to children being placed  for adoption who have been removed from the home of their biological family  because of abuse or neglect. He suggested that the failure of post-adoption  agreement legislation to pass the General Assembly during the past two  legislative sessions did not bode well for its passage in the 2007 Session  unless some concessions were made to limit the scope of the bill. The 2007  Session begins on January 24.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4266</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4266</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Martial Arts and Film Legend Chuck Norris Now Fights Abortion</strong><a name="4" rel="nofollow"></a></h3>
&ldquo;Walker Texas Ranger&rdquo; Star Now Gives a Roundhouse  Kick to the Face of Abortion<br />
<br />
<div>By Peter J. Smith and John-Henry Westen <br />
<br />
<span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); background: transparent none repeat scroll 0%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;" id="lw_1170513138_31">WASHINGTON</span>,  February 2, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) &ndash; &ldquo;Instead of killing we say aborting;  instead of dissect we say research.&rdquo; Those words were published last January 22,  the 36th anniversary of Roe v. Wade by none other than martial arts legend and  action film star Chuck Norris.<br />
<br />
Chuck Norris is a Hollywood film star  famous for his martial arts films beginning in 1973 with &ldquo;Return of the Dragon&rdquo;  with Bruce Lee, and especially for his role as Walker in the 1993-2001 hit  television series &ldquo;Walker, Texas Ranger.&rdquo; Now, the renowned martial arts  champion takes on the culture of death as a recommitted Christian in a column at  WorldNetDaily.com entitled &ldquo;The aftermath of legalized abortion.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;In an  evolutionary, self-centered world, in which man is nothing more than a glorified  ape aimlessly shooting for stars of deification, it's not difficult to  understand how the slippery slope of human degradation has led from fetal  devaluing to discarding,&rdquo; wrote Norris at WorldNetDaily where he is a featured  weekly columnist.<br />
<br />
Norris wrote that after the Supreme Court&rsquo;s 1973 Roe v.  Wade decision legalizing abortion, &ldquo;the primacy of a woman's rights prevailed  and the rights of the unborn were not only abandoned, but their nature legally  reduced to nonhuman.&rdquo; That legacy of abortion, Norris continued, has lead to an  unimaginable aftermath for a practice that needs to cover guilt and  accountability in euphemisms: &ldquo;instead of baby we say fetus; instead of killing  we say aborting; instead of dissect we say research; instead of extermination  chambers we say abortion clinics &ndash; ad nauseam.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Norris&rsquo; pro-life advocacy  is a key part of his renewed Christian faith, a faith he says was nourished by  his mother and Billy Graham as a youth, but lost when he succumbed to the moral  temptations and glamour of Hollywood. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;For too many years I was in  rebellion to God. Now I'm a rebel with a cause for God and for grassroots  America,&rdquo; Norris told his WND audience in a Christmastime column, where he  credited his second wife Gena&rsquo;s devotion to her Baptist faith as &ldquo;the instrument  to my spiritual renewal.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The former star of &ldquo;Walker&rdquo; said that Americans  needed to clone a few creeds in order to bring back civility to America such  as:<br />
<br />
1. I believe human life is made in the image of God and as such has  intrinsic value, worthy to save. And, as human beings, all zygotes are 'created  equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights,  that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.' (Preamble of  the Declaration of Independence).&rdquo; <br />
<br />
2. I believe aborting or destroying  human life is morally wrong and goes against God's law.<br />
<br />
3. I believe ours  and others' mistakes can be forgiven and even turned around for the  good.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;There might be illegitimate parents in the world &ndash; I know because  I was one, but there are not illegitimate children,&rdquo; stated Norris, who related  his own experience about how God brought the blessing of his daughter Dina out  of an affair that wrecked his first marriage. Norris said his daughter is no  mistake and very much apart of his life and family like all his  children.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;God has a plan and purpose for each of our lives. And He can  turn around what we and others mean for harm and use it for good,&rdquo; said the  famous &ldquo;Texas Ranger&rdquo;. &ldquo;If you or someone you know has aborted a baby or is  contemplating such a decision, I strongly encourage you to seek some  help.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Read Chuck Norris&rsquo; article &ldquo;The aftermath of legalized abortion&rdquo;  at WorldNetDaily:<br />
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53869"><font color="#003399">http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53869</font></a></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4265</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4265</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Super Bowl XLI Coaches are Men of Faith</font></strong></div>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>Leaders are more committed to Christ than the game, ministry says.</em>
<div>
<div>It's Super Bowl weekend, and this year&rsquo;s game between the Chicago Bears and  the Indianapolis Colts will be noted for two men on the sidelines who are as  well-known for their love of Christ as for their coaching skills: Tony Dungy and  Lovie Smith.  </div>
<div>When his Colts came back from an 18-point deficit in the AFC Championship  game to beat the Patriots a couple of weeks ago, Dungy gave God the credit.  </div>
<div>&ldquo;I just have to thank the Lord,&quot; he said. &quot;He did it in such a way that  nobody would believe it, and we&rsquo;ve got to give the Lord a lot of credit for  giving us the strength to do it.&rdquo; </div>
<div>It&rsquo;s almost common for athletes to give a nod to the Almighty these days,  and there does seem to be a strong connection between faith and sport. In this  year&rsquo;s big game, Dungy will face the Chicago Bears, led by Lovie Smith. He, too,  has made his faith very public.</div>
<div>&quot;Jesus Christ has the ending,&quot; Smith said. &quot;He knows the ending right now,  and the ending for all of us as Christian men will be successful.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Bill Pugh, president of Athletes in Action, said many Christian athletes  often have a unique way of merging their faith and their athletic talent.</div>
<div>&ldquo;The field of competition provides a crucible for us to do basically two  things: to get to know God better, and then to make Him known in a very real and  tangible way,&rdquo; he told Family News in Focus. </div>
<div>Smith and Dungy both compete that way. </div>
<div>&ldquo;Regardless of who wins the game,&quot; Pugh said, &quot;I think the prayer for both  Lovie and for Tony is that God would ultimately be glorified and that the  spotlight would be placed on Him.&rdquo; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4264</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4264</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="4">Current birth rates could produce Muslim domination</font></strong></div>
<div id="entry-1065">
<div>
<div>Chad Groening <br />
<small><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 2, 2007</font></small>  <br />
<br />
<img alt="US map with Islamic crescent star" />
<div>The Population Research Institute says the Western world is facing a crisis  as virtually every country has birth rates well below the replacement rate of  2.1 children per woman.</div>
<strong></strong><br />
</div>
<div id="more">
<div>A pro-family organization has done extensive research into birth rates  around the world and has concluded that if the Western world wants to survive,  it better start having more children. The <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.pop.org/">Population Research Institute</a> (PRI) says  virtually every Western or Westernized nation on the planet is slowly dying off  because birth rates have fallen below the 2.1-child-per-woman replacement  level.</div>
<div>PRI spokesman Joseph D'Agostino says for the most part, only Muslims have  high birth rates. &quot;It's because Christians and Jews are refusing to have  children, refusing to get married, [and] having such low birth rates that the  Muslims are going to inherit the Earth,&quot; he explains. &quot;It's not anything the  Muslims are doing; it's what Christians and Jews are <em>not </em>doing.&quot;</div>
<div>D'Agostino says the future of the world will certainly be quite different  if Muslims become the dominate population group in the coming decades. &quot;I think  we can see what life is like in Islamic countries,&quot; he says. &quot;I think Christians  know that it's a false religion. And we can see that the Muslim world is  becoming actually more radical and, in many ways, is headed backwards into its  barbaric phase.&quot;</div>
<div>D'Agostino notes that it is only through immigration that the U.S.  population continues to grow -- and that the current situation begs a pragmatic  solution: &quot;If you don't want the world to turn into Saudi Arabia, maybe people  other than Muslims need to start having some kids at the rate the Muslims are  having kids.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4263</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4263</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="4">Former instructor warns of yoga's spiritual  implications</font></strong></div>
<div id="entry-1069">
<div>
<div>Jim Brown<br />
<small><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 2, 2007</font></small> <br />
<br />
<img alt="yoga" />
<div>An ex-yoga teacher turned Christian evangelist says he is disturbed by the  growing popularity of yoga programs in schools. He feels adding Hindu-influenced  yoga regimens to public school curriculums is not only dangerous but also  violates the Constitution&rsquo;s Establishment Clause.</div>
<strong></strong> <br />
</div>
<div id="more">
<div>More than 100 public and private schools across the U.S. are reportedly  teaching yoga to young people using a secular curriculum developed by a  California woman named Tara Guber. The program she developed for school kids  uses terms like &quot;bunny breathing&quot; for yogic panting and &quot;time-in&quot; for  meditation. But innocuous as the program may sound, one former yoga instructor  says Guber&rsquo;s curriculum and others like it are a bad idea.</div>
<div>Mike Shreve was a teacher of yoga and meditation at four universities  before he was &quot;saved&quot; out of Eastern religions and went on to found a Christian  ministry called <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.thetruelight.net/">The True Light Project</a>. He sees some definite dangers in  introducing such programs to young people in U.S. schools.</div>
<div>&quot;First of all I believe it is a violation of the commitment this nation has  made to the separation of church and state,&rdquo; Shreve says. &ldquo;And secondly,&rdquo; he  notes, &ldquo;I'm surprised that so many schools have started using this in their  curriculum -- apparently without it being challenged by those who understand the  religious roots of yoga.&quot;</div>
<div>Yoga has Hindu roots and retains that religious system&rsquo;s influences, the  former instructor contends. Even teachers of Hindu themselves have acknowledged  that there is no way yoga can be separated from its religious base, he  asserts.</div>
<div>&quot;Maybe it is being reduced to just an exercise regimen,&rdquo; Shreve says. &ldquo;But  for those who are not taught the differences and those who are not exposed to  the spiritual roots of yoga,&rdquo; he warns, &ldquo;that can be the first step &ndash; in a very  wrong direction -- that will lead them into the meditative aspects of yoga and  the false religious overtones that are involved in the practice of yoga.&quot;</div>
<div>The head of the True Light Project was himself once a student of an Indian  guru and also formerly operated a yoga ashram with a number of people who had  dedicated themselves to full-time study of the practice. He says the whole  purpose of practicing yoga in any of its aspects is to bring a person to an  altered state of consciousness. </div>
<div>Yoga programs do not belong in schools, Shreve insists, both for legal and  spiritual reasons. He says he is disturbed by the prevalence of yoga programs in  public and private schools, where they introduce children to Eastern religion  under the guise of a secular curriculum.<br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4262</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4262</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div align="left"><strong><font size="3">The  NFL&rsquo;s Heavy-Handed Attempt to Silence Churches is Out of Bounds  </font></strong></div>
<div><font size="3">Miami, FL &ndash; The NFL&rsquo;s  heavy-handed attempt to prohibit churches from showing the Super Bowl to church  members defies common sense. The NFL demanded that Fall Creek Baptist Church in  Indianapolis, Indiana, cancel its advertised Super Bowl party. In addition to  objecting to the church&rsquo;s use of the words &ldquo;Super Bowl&rdquo; in promotions, the  league objected to use of a screen larger than 55 inches and disliked the  church&rsquo;s plans to show a video highlighting the Christian testimonies of Colts  coach Tony Dungy and Chicago Bears coach Lovie Smith.</font></div>
<div><font size="3">The NFL freely admits it  routinely makes exceptions for bars and other commercial establishments to show  its games with big screen televisions and projection systems. Liberty Counsel  characterized this unnecessary singling out of churches as heavy-handed and  unfair. The NFL has publicly stated a preference for establishments that sell  alcohol over churches hosting a wholesome, family-oriented gathering to watch  the biggest football game of the year. With the popularity of big screen TVs and  home entertainment, the NFL&rsquo;s heavy-handed intimidation tactics cross the line  into private homes. Will the NFL demand that viewing the Super Bowl at home with  friends must be done on screens smaller than 55 inches? This is certainly not  the intent of copyright laws, and such tactics by the NFL run afoul of common  sense and the spirit of the game.</font></div>
<div><font size="3">Mathew D. Staver, Founder  of Liberty Counsel and Dean of Liberty University School of Law, commented:  &ldquo;People throughout the world gather to watch the greatest athletic event of the  year. Some view the game on small screens and some on large screens. When cars  gather outside our private homes on Sunday afternoon, will the NFL knock on the  door and ask to measure our TV screens? It appears that in the NFL&rsquo;s way of  thinking, TV screens bigger than 55 inches are fine for bars but not churches.  This discriminatory and nonsensical act of the NFL makes the league look petty,  and the NFL should apologize for this silliness.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
</font></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4261</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4261</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="4">NY law school rejects Christian student group</font></strong></div>
<div id="entry-1061">
<div>
<div>Jim Brown<br />
<small><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 1, 2007</font></small> <br />
<br />
<img alt="Pace Law School" />
<div>Pace Law School in White Plains, New York, is being asked to reverse its  decision to deny recognition to a campus Christian student group. According to  the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, the school refuses to give  the Christian Legal Society chapter official status, even after &quot;remarkable  concessions&quot; by the faith-based group.</div>
<strong></strong><br />
</div>
<div id="more">
<div>The Student Bar Association at Pace Law School in White Plains has denied  official recognition to the campus chapter of the Christian Legal Society. The  move comes despite the fact that the Christian group added &quot;sexual orientation&quot;  to a non-discrimination clause in its constitution and opened membership to  non-Christians.</div>
<div>Greg Lukianoff is president of the academic freedom and individual rights  watchdog group, the <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.thefire.org/">Foundation for Individual Rights in Education</a> (FIRE). He says  his organization is calling on Pace officials to recognize the Christian Legal  Society, which has, he notes, made &quot;remarkable concessions&quot; in order to conform  to the school's non-discrimination policies. </div>
<div>Lukianoff says the Pace Student Bar Association also denied recognition to  the Muslim Law Students' Association, presumably for similar reasons. But  freedom of association &quot;means precious little,&quot; the students' rights advocate  asserts, if a group is not allowed to exclude people who do not share its  beliefs. </div>
<div>&quot;That applies with equal force to the College Republicans, to the College  Democrats, to the College Greens,&quot; Lukianoff contends. &quot;None of these groups  have to admit people who don't believe in the message of the group,&quot; he points  out. And why, he asks, would anyone want to join a group with whose message he  or she is not in agreement anyway? </div>
<div>Despite the illogic of this move, Lukianoff observes, Pace's Student Bar  Association banned the campus chapter of the Christian Legal Society, claiming  the group's beliefs were too &quot;narrow.&quot; He says this shows the law school has  abandoned its commitment to freedom of expression as well as freedom of  association.</div>
<div>&quot;Now, this is quite remarkable,&quot; the FIRE spokesman contends. &quot;By any  argument, any ideological group can have views that some other group might  consider narrow,&quot; he says; &quot;but it is not the right or privilege of a student  association to evaluate the sincerity, importance, or breadth of religious  beliefs to decide if they deem them appropriate.&quot;</div>
<div>The dean of Pace Law School said Monday that he disagreed with the Student  Bar Association's decision. Nevertheless, he left the ban on the Christian Legal  Society in place, pending review by the school's general counsel.  </div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4260</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4260</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="4">Pending Russian law could threaten Christian  outreach</font></strong></div>
<div id="entry-1032">
<div>
<div>Allie Martin<br />
<small><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">February 1, 2007</font></small>  <br />
<br />
<img alt="hands in jail" />
<div>The Slavic Gospel Association says a new law that will soon take effect in  Russia could have a chilling impact on Christian churches and ministries in the  former communist country.</div>
<strong></strong><br />
</div>
<div id="more">
<div>A spokesman with the <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.sga.org/">Slavic Gospel Association</a> (SGA) says Christians in Russia face  uncertain times because of a new religion law due to take effect this spring  that would impose registration and reporting restrictions on churches. The &quot;law  on non-governmental organizations&quot; set to take effect in Russia in April  reportedly would require non-governmental groups (NGOs), including churches, to  register with state agencies. The groups would also be required to list their  funding sources and provide records of all meetings.</div>
<div>In an interview with <em>Mission Network News</em>, David Genn of the  Slavic Gospel Association says many evangelicals are concerned about the pending  legislation and its anticipated detrimental effect on outreach efforts -- and  are praying for God's intervention.</div>
<div>&quot;[Those of us] here in the West who are aware of this [are] praying that  God would stay the implementation of this because there's a number of laws on  the books over there, if they were enforced, that would be significantly  limiting to the church,&quot; Genn shares.</div>
<div>The SGA official explains that in various regions of the country, laws that  may have been implemented are not necessarily enforced because of the  relationship that already exists between local church pastors and local  government officials.</div>
<div>&quot;And so we would pray first of all that God might stay this [new law] --  and if it is implemented, that God would give favor with these brothers with the  local government authorities,&quot; he says.</div>
<div>Genn recently returned from Russia as part of a Christmas outreach to  children.</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4259</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4259</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Pro-Life Congressman Wants Adoption Tax Credit Made Permanent</strong></h3>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
February 2</em><em>,  2007</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>A  pro-life congressman has introduced a measure that would make the adoption tax  credit permanent. Rep. Joe Wilson, a South Carolina Republican, introduced H.R.  471, which would prevent that the current $10,000 tax credit for adoption  expenses from expiring 2010.
<div>Wilson sent a letter to his Congressional colleagues on Thursday asking  them to support his bill. </div>
<div>He thinks it has a good chance of making headway even though abortion  advocates control Congress and noted that pro-abortion Ways and Means Committee  Chairmen Charlie Rangel, a Democrat from New York, is a co-sponsor.</div>
<div>According to a 2005 adoption cost survey by Adoptive Families, the average  cost of adoption was between $20,000 and $25,000.</div>
<div>&quot;Middle-income families who cannot have their own children are watching  their dreams of parenting quickly fade,&quot; Wilson said in the letter, provided to  LifeNews.com. &quot;While some aid is available, the financial strain adoptive  families undergo cannot be overstated.&quot;</div>
<div>Wilson's bill would provide a tax credit up to $10,000 for qualified  expenses relating to the adoption of a child for both domestic and international  adoptions. In addition, an employer may offer up to $10,000 in qualified  adoption expenses that will be excluded from income. </div>
<div>Costs that may be covered include attorney's fees, reasonable and necessary  adoption fees, court costs, traveling costs, and other costs directly relating  to the legal adoption of an eligible child. Eligible children are those under  the age of 18 that are physically and mentally incapable of caring for  themselves.</div>
<div>&quot;As a member of the Congressional Coalition on Adoption, and the father of  an adopted son, I respectfully request your support of this important  legislation,&quot; Wilson wrote.</div>
<div>Senator Jim Bunning of Kentucky is introducing a companion bill in the  Senate.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4258</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4258</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Congressional Bill May Discriminate Against Disabled Unborn  Babies</strong></h3>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
February 2</em><em>,  2007</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>A  leading pro-life group is worried that a bill intended to protect the disabled  may leave out disabled unborn children who could become victims of abortion  simply because of their disabilities.
<div>On Wednesday, a Senate committee approved the Genetic Information  Nondiscrimination Act (S. 358). The measure would prevent health insurance  companies and employers from discriminating against people who test &quot;positive&quot;  for a genetic disease. </div>
<div>That's a great start the Family Research Council says, but it worries that,  while it covers individuals and their families, it excludes unborn children.  </div>
<div>The definition of &quot;family member&quot; includes the individual and &quot;a dependent  child of the individual, including a child who is born to or placed for adoption  with the individual.&quot; </div>
<div>&quot;FRC is extremely concerned that this definition would exempt unborn  children and children in the process of adoption from the bill's protections,&quot;  the group said in a statement LifeNews.com received. </div>
<div>&quot;Research suggests that as many as 92% of unborn children who test positive  for Down Syndrome are aborted, in many cases because the unborn child is denied,  or subject to the denial of, health insurance,&quot; FRC added.</div>
<div>&quot;Health insurance companies and employers should not be allowed to use  genetic information about unborn children to discriminate against their families  or to pressure parents to abort them,&quot; the pro-life organization  concluded.</div>
<div>The group says it will continue to work with leading pro-life senators,  including Republican Sens. Mike Enzi of Wyoming, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, and  Richard Burr of North Carolina, to ensure that the loophole is  closed.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Printed from: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2908.html">http://www.lifenews.com/nat2908.html</a></em><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4257</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4257</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Pro-Life Groups Want Safety Review of RU-486</font></strong></div>
<div>by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>The FDA says it plans to step up its review or new drugs, but makes no  mention of the abortion pill.</em>
<div>
<div>Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials announced Tuesday they will  impose tighter safety regulations on the testing, release and follow-up of new  drugs, but abortion-related drugs did not receive specific mention.<br />
 <br />
Dr.  Andrew von Eschenbach, commissioner of the FDA, said the agency carefully  considered criticism of its fast track approval of drugs such as the abortion  pill, RU-486.</div>
<div>&quot;The extensive input we have received from stakeholders,&quot; von Eschenbach  said, &quot;has proven invaluable as we transform the drug and medical product safety  system and continue to fulfill our mission to protect and promote the public  health.&quot;</div>
<div>According to von Eschenbach, the FDA will improve its monitoring of  pre-market testing and will continue that assessment once a drug has been on the  market for 12 to 18 months.</div>
<div>Tony Perkins, president of Family Research Council, said the FDA puts lives  at risk  when it approves unsafe products like RU-486.</div>
<div>&quot;If the FDA wants to restore its credibility with the American public,&quot; he  said, &quot;it has to not only keep big drug companies from influencing the approval  process on questionable drugs, it must also keep its own ideologies and  political agendas -- that are endangering women -- in check.&quot;</div>
<div>RU-486, sold under the name Mifeprex, can be taken up to 49 days after  pregnancy begins and causes a spontaneous abortion. At least six women have died  in the U.S. after taking it. More than 800 reports indicate other complications  directly associated with the drug.</div>
<div>Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, said there are two  key elements in the plan.<br />
 <br />
&quot;We believe that the testing that was done on  RU-486 was completely sub-standard,&quot; she said, &quot;and didn't even meet the basic  requirements that any other drug would have to go through.&quot; </div>
<div>Once RU-486 was on the market, Wright added, the FDA didn't seem to take  action when reports about associated health risks started coming in.</div>
<div>&quot;We know that there have been hundreds and hundreds of complications and  numerous deaths related to RU-486,&quot; she said, &quot;and yet the FDA didn't seem to be  doing anything about it.&quot;</div>
<div>Wright said only about 10 percent of problems related to drugs or medical  devices get reported -- and even after problems are reported, the FDA claims a  lack of funding prevents post-market surveillance and action. </div>
<div>&quot;So this (report) seems to be saying 'We're going to strengthen that,' &quot;  she said. &quot;They may actually have some actions they'll be taking when it appears  that a drug can cause serious complications after it's been on the  market.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4256</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4256</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="4">Former porn addict says healing, hope available</font></strong></div>
<div id="entry-981">
<div>
<div>Allie Martin and Jody Brown<br />
<small><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/"><font size="2">OneNewsNow.com</font></a><br />
<font size="2">January 30, 2007</font></small> <br />
<br />
<div>Apathy and silence in the church, says Mike Genung, are Satan's greatest weapons in the battle against sexual addiction among Christians. That is why he is encouraging churches, for the sake of their families, to cease playing &quot;ostrich&quot; regarding the issue.</div>
<strong><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/audio/2007/01/30/alliegenungvoicer.mp3">Hear This Report</a></strong> <br />
</div>
<div id="more">
<div>A former porn addict says churches need to pull their heads out of the sand and do more to address the issue of sexual addiction among Christians.</div>
<div>Mike Genung is founder of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.blazinggrace.org/">Blazing Grace</a>, a Colorado Springs-based ministry offering hope for those addicted to pornography and resources for churches to help them deal with the problem among their own members. Genung accepted Christ at a young age, but says he started dabbling in pornography as a teenager. &quot;[T]here were some problems in our family which included sexual abuse,&quot; he shares on his ministry website, &quot;and I learned to cope by using sex for comfort and love.&quot;</div>
<div>Genung says he was addicted to pornography for more than two decades, until one day in 1999.</div>
<div>&quot;One morning I was reading through the Book of First John and reading all the verses about God's grace and that God is love, and I just got depressed,&quot; he says. At that point, says Genung, he asked: &quot;Lord, why is when I read about Your grace and Your love, I get depressed?&quot; According to the ministry founder, &quot;The words came right back: '<em>Because you don't believe it</em>.'&quot;</div>
<div>While shocked to hear that, Genung says it was the truth. &quot;The Lord had been saying 'I love you' to me all of my life, and I hadn't believed Him,&quot; he states. Since realizing that God loved him in spite of everything he had done, Genung's life has not been the same, he says. He started Blazing Grace Ministries to help men who are addicted to porn -- and he offers himself as proof that there is hope for Christians who want a way out of that addiction.</div>
<div>Genung shares that he overcame his addiction by relying fully on God's redemptive grace, and also by making himself accountable to fellow believers. And he laments that, like he used to be, there are many men in churches struggling with porn addiction -- but he says freedom is possible.</div>
<div>&quot;I've seen God pull marriages [out] that were moving toward divorce and change the man and heal the wife,&quot; he says, emphasizing the latter &quot;because a lot of what people forget about is the wife gets hurt in this whole process.&quot; He cites studies showing that upwards of 50 percent of men in churches struggle with porn, and 20 percent of women are involved with pornography.</div>
<div>The church, says the former porn addict, must do more to confront the problem of sexual addiction because of the high numbers of Christians who struggle in that area.</div>
<div>&quot;We need to speak out [from the pulpit] because when we're silent ... a man who is struggling with this shame assumes that [he] dare not tell anybody else because [he fears he will] get rejected,&quot; he shares -- from experience. He says on his website that because so few people in the church were talking about struggles with sexual addiction, he assumed he was &quot;the only one&quot; -- which encouraged him to keep his &quot;dark side&quot; hidden. &quot;This gave lust more power over me and intensified my search for 'more and better' sexual fantasies,&quot; he writes.</div>
<div>And that, he says, is why the church needs to be proactive in the battle against sexual addiction within the church. &quot;Apathy and silence are Satan's greatest weapons in this war,&quot; he continues, &quot;so we've got to boldly get out there, tell all of the truth, provide answers, and point the sexually broken to Christ. If we play ostrich in this issue, more families will be taken out -- there's a lot at stake.&quot;</div>
<div>Genung recently released <em>The Road to Grace</em>, a book about his victorious battle over porn.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4242</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4242</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>   </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Religious-Liberties Bill Reintroduced in Senate<br />
</strong>by Pete Winn, associate editor<br />
<br />
<em>Legislation would deny attorneys' fees to groups including the ACLU.</em> <br />
<br />
The Public Expressions of Religion Act made a comeback on <span id="lw_1170246530_0">Capitol Hill</span> on Monday. <br />
<br />
The bill would prevent activist groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) from challenging religious displays on public property and then demanding the government pay attorneys' fees. <br />
<br />
It failed in the 109th Congress. <br />
<br />
Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., said his legislation is needed because numerous school districts and towns have been &quot;coerced into settling claims out of a fear of huge monetary losses.&quot; <br />
<br />
&quot;It's not fair for the ACLU to make taxpayers pay their legal bills,&quot; the senator added. <br />
<br />
Amanda Banks, federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said the ACLU scours the country to find schools and other public places where the Ten Commandments, crosses or Bibles are displayed. The group sues for removal, misusing a law originally intended for civil-rights cases. <br />
<br />
&quot;They can say, 'If you don't remove this, we're going to sue you,&quot; Banks said. &quot;The position they put a school district or town in is -- 'Either cave in or be prepared to lose a very large amount of money.' &quot; <br />
<br />
Not surprisingly, the ACLU opposes the measure. <br />
<br />
&quot;If PERA were to pass, Congress would isolate and discourage enforcement of a specific piece of our Bill of Rights,&quot; said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU's <span id="lw_1170246530_1">Washington, D.C</span>., office. <br />
<br />
But Brownback said the Bill of Rights takes a body blow whenever the ACLU wins legal fees in freedom of religious expression cases. <br />
<br />
One such case occurred in 2003, he said, when liberal groups won a challenge in <span id="lw_1170246530_2">Alabama</span> to remove a Ten Commandments display from the rotunda of the <span id="lw_1170246530_3">Alabama</span> Supreme Court building. Taxpayers were forced to pay nearly $550,000 in attorneys' fees to Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the ACLU of <span id="lw_1170246530_4">Alabama</span> and the Southern Poverty Law Center. <br />
<br />
Then, in <span id="lw_1170246530_5">Pennsylvania</span>, a judge awarded $2 million to the ACLU of <span id="lw_1170246530_6">Pennsylvania</span> and Americans United after the groups successfully sued the <span id="lw_1170246530_7">Dover, Pa</span>., school board for requiring science teachers to teach intelligent design alongside evolution. The award was later reduced to $1 million. <br />
<br />
The real question: How realistic are PERA's chances with ACLU-friendly Democrats in charge? <br />
<br />
&quot;It's going to be a tough bill to sell in this Congress,&quot; Banks said. <br />
<br />
Last September, the House passed its own version -- championed by then-Rep. John Hostettler, R-Ind. That bill died in the Senate, and Hostettler was not re-elected. <br />
<br />
&quot;Last year, just one Democratic Senate member was a co-sponsor of the bill, and that was Sen. Ben Nelson of <span id="lw_1170246530_8">Nebraska</span>,&quot; Banks noted. &quot;He has not signed onto it yet this year, but there's no reason to believe that he wouldn't do so at a later date. One out of 51 Democratic senators is probably not enough.&quot; <br />
<br />
Brownback, meanwhile, said his legislation would not stop plaintiffs with legitimate claims from having their day in court. <br />]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4241</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4241</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>ACLU Targets <span id="lw_1170160223_0">Kentucky Children's Home</span></h3>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div> </div>
<div><em>Federal suit challenges state funding of Baptist agency.</em></div>
<div> </div>
<div>A <span id="lw_1170160223_1">Kentucky foster care program is facing a threat of closure thanks to an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) challenge. </span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="lw_1170160223_2">Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children (KBHC) receives state money to help fund residential homes, foster placements and pregnancy counseling centers for young people. The ACLU filed suit in federal court, charging the state funding runs counter to the First Amendment.</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Bill Smithwick, president of KBHC, told Family News in Focus he stands by the agency and its Christian foundation.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;Our goal and our mission in ministry is to take care of these kids,&quot; he said. &quot;We do so from an unapologetically faith-based perspective.&quot;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The ACLU, which did not return calls about the case, is asking the court to order KBHC to pay back millions it has received from <span id="lw_1170160223_3">Kentucky over the years.</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;The very worst case scenario, which I don't think would happen,&quot; Smithwick said, &quot;would be if, indeed, the ACLU won on every count, and we had to repay the money. I mean -- we'd be gone.&quot;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>John Sheller, a KBHC lawyer, said he is confident about the agency's position.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;The Establishment Clause is obviously a very complex area of the law,&quot; he said. &quot;But the most recent cases of the Supreme Court would tend our direction.&quot;</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4240</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4240</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">IMs reaching women vulnerable to abortion<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Call center adds option to provide instant advice and counsel</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>There's a new way to have a talk these days, and it's as easy as a click and a blip. That's why a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://etools.ncol.com/a/jgroup/bg_wwwlifedonorcom_wnd-lifedonor_247.html">call center that refers people to crisis pregnancy centers</a> says it's an effective way to reach those young and pregnant, and not knowing what they can do.
<div>&quot;It only makes sense that Instant Messaging is the fastest growing contact channel for the demographic segment facing a potential crisis pregnancy,&quot; according to a statement from the organization called <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.optionline.org/">www.OptionLine.org.</a>
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>The electronic communication allows individuals seeking help or advice &ndash; or options &ndash; to speak to counselors in complete anonymity, but still have their concerns addressed &ndash; and addressed right now.
<div>&quot;The stories we hear day in and day out are amazing,&quot; said Joe Young, Option Line's executive director. &quot;In 2006 we had over 204,000 contacts from young men and women seeking advice. More and more of them believe abortion is NOT the answer, but unfortunately do not know the options available to them for supporting through parenting or adoption.&quot;
<div>He said the organization's outreach through IM is becoming bigger and bigger &ndash; and already has proven its success, as the following transcript of an exchange shows:
<div><blockquote><strong>Anonymous Client</strong> (11:06:12 AM): hello ive talked to you before
<div><strong>Answers at OL1 </strong>(11:06:35 AM): May not have been me, but possibly
<div><strong>Anonymous Client</strong> (11:07:48 AM): yeah i just wanted to tell you guys that i decided to keep my baby boy James and now hes 1 month and 3 weeks old
<div><strong>Anonymous Client</strong> (11:08:03 AM): im very happy that i kept him..hes my life
<div><strong>Answers at OL1 </strong>(11:08:25 AM): Oh hon, thats amazing
<div><strong>Answers at OL1 </strong>(11:08:30 AM): thanks for telling us
<div><strong>Anonymous Client</strong> (11:09:16 AM): no problem, its the most i can do because i'll never be able to meet you guys in person..and you helped me make the biggest decision in my life
<div><strong>Anonymous Client</strong> (11:09:23 AM): so thank you very very veeeerrrryyy much!
<div><strong>Answers at OL1</strong> (11:10:09 AM): you are welcome, and you did it, we just nudged, i am very happy for you, its good to know you are ok with your decision
<div><strong>Answers at OL1 </strong>(11:10:12 AM): we're always here </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>The exchange took 240 seconds, probably less time than it would have taken the happy young mother to look up a telephone number.
<div>&quot;In speaking with a young woman the other evening, she didn&rsquo;t even realize that someone could help her with parenting classes and instruction,&quot; said Young. &quot;It&rsquo;s so frustrating that <em>abortion</em> had been drilled into her head for so long, and that she didn&rsquo;t know what else she could do.&rdquo;
<div>More and more young women these days use the Internet for e-mail and chat, and, recognizing that, OptionLine's call center, which refers callers to crisis pregnancy centers around the country for testing, counseling, advice, direction, and options, added the IM option to reach them, officials said.
<div>It allows young women &ndash; or men &ndash; to &quot;communicate freely and confidentially with a consultant, and learn that they might have some positive pregnancy options, instead of abortion.&quot;
<div>The OptionLine website provides information to more than 20,000 visitors &ndash; including women vulnerable to the societal campaign promoting abortion &ndash; about local pregnancy centers and services in their area each week, officials said.
<div>OptionLine's call center is open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and is staffed by dozens of trained phone consultants to connect women in need directly to those who can help.
<div>It also offers help to those struggling with post-abortion complications.
<div>The organization said 78 percent of the women who call, or IM, these days who believe they are pregnant are considering an abortion. &quot;But statistics also show that nine out of 10 women, upon visiting their local pregnancy center, WILL choose life &ndash; instead of abortion,&quot; the organization said.
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53829">WND had reported earlier</a> on the success rate that crisis pregnancy centers have had when girls come in for counseling and ultrasound tests.
<div>The new IM program clicked &quot;instantly&quot; with those in need:
<div><blockquote><strong>Anonymous Client2 </strong>(11:58:59 AM): I think this is so awesome we can IM someone about this thanks!
<div><strong>Anonymous Client2 </strong>(11:59:19 AM): I feel relieved to talk to a professional
<div><strong>Anonymous Client2 </strong>(12:00:04 PM): as we speak
<div><strong>Answers at OL1 </strong>(12:00:54 PM): Well thank you, I am grateful to have the opportunity to be here for you
<div><strong>Anonymous Client2 </strong>(12:01:23 PM): You Rock!
<div><strong>Anonymous Client2 </strong>(12:05:19 PM): ok I would love to get tested again and get an ultrasound. Where can I go to do both?
<div><strong><em>Segment redacted because of confidential information and telephone exchange</em>
<div><strong>Anonymous Client2 </strong>(12:32:20 PM): thanks so much this has been so convenient for me and you have answered all my Q's!!! who ever came up w/ this idea is brilliant!!!
<div><strong>Answers at OL1 </strong>(12:32:47 PM): Thank you! I am so glad to have been able to help you!
<div><strong>Anonymous Client2 </strong>(12:34:04 PM): ur a blessing!!!
<div><strong>Answers at OL1 </strong>(12:34:25 PM): So are you...you have really brightened my day
<div><strong>Anonymous Client2 </strong>(12:34:36 PM): what does O L stand for?
<div><strong>Answers at OL1 </strong>(12:34:44 PM): Option Line</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</strong></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Option Line's call center is located in Columbus, Ohio, and was formed as a joint venture between Care Net and Heartbeat International. Care Net and Heartbeat International are faith-based organizations that promote women's reproductive health by ensuring access to accurate information about all pregnancy options and the provision of positive alternatives to abortion.
<div>Those seeking help are served without regard to age, race, income, national, religious affiliation, disability or other arbitrary circumstances, client information is held in absolute confidence, and information is provided about pregnancy, fetal development, lifestyle issues and other concerns &quot;with kindness, compassion and in a caring manner.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4141</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4141</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>World War III has already begun, says Israeli spy chief<br />
<br />
Former head of Israel's intelligence service tells Portuguese newspaper it would take at least 25 years before battle against fundamentalist terrorism is won; says nuclear strike by Muslim terrorists 'very likely' </strong><br />
AFP<br />
<br />
<font size="+0"><style type="text/css">
P{margin:0;}UL{margin-bottom:0;margin-top:0;margin-right:16;padding-right:0;}OL{margin-bottom:0;margin-top:0;margin-right:32;padding-right:0;}P.pHeader {margin-bottom:3px;COLOR:#192862;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;}</style><span>
<div>A third World War is already underway between Islamic militancy and the West but most people do not realize it, the former head of Israel&rsquo;s intelligence service Mossad said in an interview published Saturday in Portugal. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>&lsquo;We are in the midst of a third World War,&rsquo; former Mossad chief Efraim Halevy told weekly newspaper Expresso.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>&lsquo;The world does not understand. A person walks through the streets of Tel Aviv, Barcelona or Buenos Aires and doesn&rsquo;t get the sense that there is a war going on,&rsquo; said Halevy who headed Mossad between 1998 and 2003.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>&lsquo;During World War I and II the entire world felt there was a war. Today no one is conscious of it. From time to time there is a terrorist attack in Madrid, London and New York and then everything stays the same.&rsquo;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Violence by Islamic militants has already disrupted international travel and trade just as in the previous two world conflicts, he said.</div>
<div> </div>
<div align="right">
<div>
<table dir="ltr" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
    <tbody>
    </tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div>Halevy, who was raised in war-time London, predicted it would take at least 25 years before the battle against Islamic fundamentalist terrorism is won and during this time a nuclear strike by Islamic militants was likely.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>&lsquo;It doesn&rsquo;t have to be something very sophisticated, It doesn&rsquo;t have to be the latest nuclear technology, it can be something simple like a dirty bomb which instead of killing millions only kills tens of thousands,&rsquo; he said.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Halevy served as an envoy for former Israeli Prime Ministers Yitzhak Shamir, Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres and is a former Israeli ambassador to the European Union.</div>
</span></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4140</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4140</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Pledge-Protection Bill Reintroduced<br />
by Pete Winn, associate editor </h3>
<div>SUMMARY: Bill would prevent courts from ruling on challenges.<br />
 <br />
A bill introduced today in the U.S. House of Representatives today would prevent federal courts from accepting challenges to the Pledge of Allegiance, specifically the phrase &quot;under God.&quot;</div>
<div>Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., said the latest version of his Pledge Protection Act -- now called the Pledge of Allegiance Act -- grew out of Americans' outrage in 2002 after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declared the Pledge unconstitutional because of the words &quot;under God.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;The congressman feels that type of treatment is really a censorship of the rights of those who wish to express certain basic principles that this country was founded upon,&quot; said Steve Taylor, Akin's press secretary. </div>
<div>Atheist Michael Newdow sued the Elk Grove Unified School District in <span id="lw_1169920546_0">Sacramento County</span>, <span id="lw_1169920546_1">Calif</span>., claiming a policy requiring students to recite the Pledge violated his daughter's religious liberty. </div>
<div>The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 2004, which ruled 8-0 to dismiss the case on technical grounds. </div>
<div>Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family Action, noted the high court never ruled on &quot;under God,&quot; so Akin's legislation is desperately needed.</div>
<div>&quot;We need the Pledge of Allegiance Act,&quot; he said, &quot;in order to prevent out-of-control courts just like the 9th Circuit from deciding that the wording of the Pledge should be revised to meet some politically correct notion the justices have about 'under God.' &quot;</div>
<div>And politically correct notions abound inside and outside courtrooms. Just this month, an Arizona charter school, Tucson Accelerated High School, banned the Pledge. </div>
<div>On Jan. 17, students were told the Pledge would no longer be recited, according to Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) attorney Jeremy Tedesco, who represents two students who challenged the ban.</div>
<div>&quot;The school allowed the student council to vote on whether to continue or discontinue the recitation of the Pledge-- and the student council decided to cease reciting the Pledge at the beginning of every day,&quot; Tedesco said.</div>
<div>Students Sam and Robert Lucero, who lost a family member in <span id="lw_1169920546_2">Iraq</span> and have two siblings fighting there now, brought a U.S. flag to school and began reciting the Pledge, but were told by school officials to stop.</div>
<div>&quot;The good news is that the school did the right thing, and righted the ship, so to speak, once they understood the law,&quot; Tedesco said.</div>
<div>Calls to the school were not returned.</div>
<div>Akin's bill passed the House in the last Congress, but failed in the Senate.<br />
 <br />
&quot;It did very well in the House,&quot; Akin's spokesman said. &quot;There was strong bipartisan support, and if it's given a chance in the House again, it will pass.&quot;</div>
<div>Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, said the new Democratic leadership needs to remember that when the Newdow ruling came down, lawmakers gathered on the Capitol steps to recite the Pledge to encourage children, teachers and Americans. </div>
<div>&quot;Now they need to do more than that,&quot; she said. &quot;They need to preserve and protect the Pledge. Children deserve the same freedom to acknowledge God when saying the Pledge that the congressmen enjoyed.&quot;</div>
<div>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4139</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4139</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Homosexual activist challenges Christian video<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Claims fraud for program of ex-'gays' that included one man who backslid</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>It's probably just a public relations stunt, but an Illinois ministry offering help to those who choose to leave the homosexual lifestyle says a new complaint a &quot;gay&quot; activist has filed with the state attorney general has to be taken seriously.
<div>The complaint was filed by activist and columnist Wayne Besen against <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://americansfortruth.com/">Americans for Truth,</a> a group set up by Peter LaBarbera to confront the homosexual agenda and provide alternatives for those who feel trapped in their choices.
<div>&quot;We're getting to the point where 'gay' legal activists are going to try to shut down pro-family groups,&quot; LaBarbera told WND in an interview. &quot;That speaks to the impulses of the other side.&quot;
<div>The complaint centers on a video that Americans for Truth advertised as available on its website, which included the story of Michael Johnston. He is a man who came out of the homosexual lifestyle to work with a Christian ministry. But, LaBarbera said, he fell back into sin and lost his ministry before seeking help to regain his footing on the &quot;straight and narrow.&quot;
<div>The attack is the result of the homosexual advocates wanting to shut down or shout down any message but their own, a &quot;totalitarian&quot; approach to conflict, LaBarbera said.
<div>&quot;They're going to harass conservatives, use their well-funded legal arms. We'll probably see a rising threat of litigation,&quot; he said. &quot;These guys play hard-ball.&quot;
<div>He said in the current complaint, the facts weren't checked, and the demand for an apology and other action because of the video Americans for Truth was &quot;selling fraudulently&quot; simply is without foundation.
<div>&quot;We never sold the video,&quot; he said.
<div>But the larger threat remains: of activists targeting Christian ministries with complaints about their actions, and their alleged violations of the so-called &quot;hate crimes&quot; laws that have been instituted in various localities.
<div>&quot;We're not changing anything because of Wayne. If we need help we'll ask for it. But the threat of a lawsuit can have a lot of pastors thinking 'I don't want to be sued like this guy got sued,'&quot; he said.
<div>In a column about the recording, Besen wrote, &quot;The anti-gay groups <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.afa.net">American Family Association</a> and Americans for Truth should be immediately shut down for committing wanton and craven acts of frauds. They are unabashed con artists duping their own members by selling a product both groups have admitted was misleading.&quot;
<div>In his complaint to state prosecutors, Besen seeks an order to &quot;require a written apology from LaBarbera that he must post prominently on his website and that refunds be offered to dissatisfied customers.&quot;
<div>But the complaint about the video &quot;It's Not Gay&quot; and Mike Johnston's role leaves out the facts of the case, LaBarbera said.
<div>&quot;Now Wayne and his friends think they have a new scandal because Americans For Truth is promoting an American Family Association (AFA) video ('It's Not Gay') featuring an interview with ex-'gay' Mike Johnston, who lost his 'ex-gay' ministry several years ago by falling back into homosexual perversion.&quot;
<div>LaBarbera said Johnston, whose Kerusso ministries was closed after his return to the homosexual lifestyle, has since then worked with Pure Life Ministries on his road back from sin.
<div>&quot;In their zeal to crush AFTAH, Besen and other homosexual activists missed a wonderful story of one man's redemption and his rescue from deep spiritual hypocrisy and sexual sin,&quot; LaBarbera said.
<div>He told WND that there are failures in Christian ministries when they are reaching out to people and trying to help them leave sin.
<div>&quot;Besen and he fellow homosexual activists have everything invested in the politically correct idea that people are naturally (born) 'gay' &ndash; and that 'sexual orientation' (another misleading term inspired by homosexual activism) is unchangeable,&quot; LaBarbera said. &quot;They are downright cruel in hoping for and exploiting failures in the ex-'gay' movement.&quot;
<div>&quot;Rather than applauding overcomers, the fanatics in 'Wayne's World' champion the failures &ndash; people who tried to walk away from homosexuality but gave up, or &ndash; even better, lost their ministries like Ted Haggard in scandal,&quot; he said.
<div>The campaign has been too effective, he said, because the general media now applauds homosexuals like former New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey, who left his wife for another man, but that same media generally views as frauds anyone who leaves the &quot;gay&quot; lifestyle.
<div>Certainly, a lengthy homosexual lifestyle is hard to leave behind, but &quot;so is drug addiction, pornography, compulsive lying and other sinful habits. How many drug abusers have relapsed back into that dangerous lifestyle, but don't we still celebrate the man or woman who comes clean and save their life from destruction?&quot; he said.
<div>&quot;There is right and wrong, and homosexual practice will always be wrong. Leaving it will always be right,&quot; he said.
<div>The complaint with Attorney General Lisa Madigan &quot;erroneously&quot; accuses the group &quot;of 'selling' false information because we put up a link on our website for an American Family Association video called 'It's Not Gay' featuring former homosexual Mike Johnston,&quot; he said.
<div>&quot;I spoke with Mike &hellip; and he described the deep heart transformation that has taken place in his life through Pure Life,&quot; LaBarbera said. &quot;He is now a humbled man at peace with God and himself, who fully owns up to the foolish pride that allowed him to be in public 'ex-gay' ministry while living a double-life as a homosexual.&quot;
<div>&quot;Mike is a former homosexual just as a man who escaped his pornography addiction (despite having a serious falling) can no longer be a 'porn user,'&quot; he said.
<div>Finally, the AFA stopped selling the video in 2003 when the scandal was revealed. It began reselling it after officials there met with Johnston and were convinced of his genuine departure from the homosexual lifestyle, he said. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4095</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4095</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">No-Fault Divorce Reform Needed</font></strong></div>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>Three states want to bring sacredness back to marriage.</em>
<div><font size="2">
<div>Citing high divorce rates as proof, same-sex marriage advocates have long argued that heterosexuals have not done a great job of keeping marriage sacred. But three states are brewing a plan to combat the trend by reforming no-fault divorce. </div>
<div>Under no-fault divorce -- the law in all 50 states -- all that's required is one unhappy spouse. He or she doesn't need a reason to end the marriage. Since no-fault divorce swept the nation in the 1970s, 38 million marriages have dissolved, according to Mike McManus, cofounder of Marriage Savers.</div>
<div>&quot;(No-fault divorce) has destroyed or . . . scarred the lives of 35 million children who are now, as they grow up, finding it very difficult to bond with someone of the opposite sex,&quot; he told Family News in Focus.</div>
<div>While 27 states have passed constitutional amendments affirming marriage as being between one man and one woman -- efforts McManus applauds -- he wonders why divorce isn&rsquo;t being addressed as well.</div>
<div>Three states want to change that. Michigan, Wisconsin and Virginia are considering mutual-consent divorce proposals; meaning both spouses must agree to split, if there are children involved. The proposals include exceptions for abuse and adultery.</div>
<div>Julaine Appling, executive director of the Family Research Institute of Wisconsin, said the government can change the perception of the institution.</div>
<div>&quot;When we allow people to enter into marriage with the understanding that they can walk away from that vow for no cause, and the other spouse cannot contest it,&quot; she said, &quot;we're sending a message to young people that marriage is not permanent.&quot;</div>
<div>FOR MORE INFORMATION<br />
To learn more about the state of marriage in the U.S., read Glenn T. Stanton's article, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/FOSI/marriage/A000000979.cfm">&quot;How is Marriage Dying in Our Culture?&quot;</a></div>
</font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4094</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4094</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">Bush Speech Silent on Most Pro-Family Issues</font></strong></div>
<div>by Pete Winn, associate editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Family advocates wish he had addressed the concerns of the people, not the new Congress.</em>
<div>
<div>Pro-family leaders say President Bush missed a golden opportunity to define the final two years of his administration by not speaking in defense of the family Tuesday night during his annual State of the Union address.<br />
 <br />
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins praised Bush for challenging Congress to protect Americans against Islamo-fascism and for how he dealt with the bulk of issues he touched on in the 50 minute-long address -- health care, energy, education, Iraq, immigration and spending reform. </div>
<div>It's what Bush didn't say that caught Perkins' attention. </div>
<div>&quot;The president failed to challenge the new majority to advance core family and cultural issues -- issues of faith, family and freedom -- that many in the new congressional majority campaigned upon last fall,&quot; he said <br />
 <br />
The speech neglected any mention of strong families -- and the &quot;culture of life&quot; the president has referenced in past speeches.</div>
<div>&quot;As the new leadership of this Congress seeks to advance ineffective and unethical stem-cell research, not to mention funding for Planned Parenthood,&quot; Perkins said, &quot;the president failed to draw a line in the sand on behalf of life.&quot; </div>
<div>He added that Bush could have mentioned marriage, the child tax credit, or even permanent tax relief -- but did not. Instead, he sent a basic message challenging the new Congress to join him in advancing bipartisan solutions to strengthen the union. </div>
<div>&quot;Our citizens don't much care which side of the aisle we sit on -- as long as we're willing to cross that aisle when there is work to be done,&quot; Bush told senators and representatives. </div>
<div>But Kristi Hamrick, a spokeswoman for American Values, said the president aimed at the wrong target. </div>
<div>&quot;Frankly, his speech was really a reaction to his critics and to the Democratic House and Senate leadership,&quot; she said. &quot;They are the ones who want to talk about global warming. They are the ones who want to say that Iraq is in a shambles. He lost a golden opportunity to set the stage -- to describe the issues that were most important to the American people.&quot; </div>
<div>Hamrick said Bush, who has two years left in the White House, was trying to be pragmatic but shouldn't have leaned so far toward the liberals. </div>
<div>&quot;He needs to take charge of the last two years of his presidency, as Ronald Reagan did,&quot; she told CitizenLink. </div>
<div>The president did get credit from pro-family analysts for mentioning a few values issues, including the fight against HIV/AIDS in Africa and the issue of judicial nominees.</div>
<div>&quot;As president, I have a duty to nominate qualified men and women to vacancies on the federal bench,&quot; Bush said, &quot;and the United States Senate has a duty, as well, to give those nominees a fair hearing and a prompt up-or-down vote on the Senate floor.&quot; </div>
<div>Jan LaRue, chief counsel of Concerned Women for America, gave the president kudos for reminding the Senate about the overarching issue of judicial nominees.</div>
<div>&quot;Every issue he addressed last night is on a docket of a court somewhere in this country,&quot; she said, &quot;many of them on the calendar of the Supreme Court of the United States.&quot;</div>
<div>Still, pro-family leaders wonder if the president was signaling a shift on other pro-family issues, given the new political situation.</div>
<div>&quot;What will become of the culture of life, the defense of marriage, and permanent family-friendly tax policies?&quot; Perkins asked. &quot;These are the very issues that the president has fought for in the past six years.&quot; </div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4092</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4092</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h2>Informed-Choice Bill May Have Tough Time in Congress</h2>
<div class="author">from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>Pro-life legislation not welcomed by House Democratic leaders.</em>
<div class="text"><font size="2">
<div>The House is considering a plan that would give government grants to community-based pregnancy-resource centers for the purchase of ultrasound equipment. But with the current leadership in Congress, the legislation may have a tough time getting through committee. </div>
<div>H.R. 223, the Informed Choice Act, would authorize the secretary of Health and Human Services to offer federal money to clinics that provide free services to women, according to its sponsor, Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla. </div>
<div>&quot;Ultrasound equipment can give women, particularly poor women, an opportunity to see the fetus and understand the scope of what they're doing, if they have an unplanned pregnancy,&quot; the congressman said. </div>
<div>While Stearns hopes every pregnant woman will choose life, his bill could have a difficult time in the Democrat-led House.</div>
<div>&quot;If we can at least get a hearing on this and get witnesses, then I think it will build up the kind of support and consensus we need to move it through the House,&quot; he told Family News in Focus. </div>
<div>The truth is, even when the Republicans were in charge, federal money for ultrasound didn&rsquo;t get much play, according to Carrie Gordon Earll, senior analyst for bioethics at Focus on the Family Action. She isn&rsquo;t holding out hope this time around, either.</div>
<div>&quot;From what we&rsquo;ve seen in the first week or so of this Congress, it's hostile not only to faith, but to life,&quot; Earll said. &quot;I would not be very optimistic about the chances of a bill like this that is obviously pro-life.&quot;</div>
<div><strong>FOR MORE INFORMATION<br />
</strong>Focus on the Family's Option Ultrasound Program offers grants to participating pregnancy-resource centers for 80 percent of the cost of a new ultrasound machine or sonography training for medical personnel. Visit the <a class="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.heartlink.org/oupdirectors.cfm">Option Ultrasound Web page</a> to learn more.</div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</font></div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4091</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4091</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Californian proposes jail time for spanking<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Childless lawmaker classifies corporal punishment alongside 'beatings'</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>A plan by a California lawmaker would turn parents who place a careful swat on the bottom of their little one enthralled in pursuit of pleasure during the &quot;Terrible Twos&quot; criminals with a record, and possibly jail time.
<div>&quot;It's really awfully arrogant to try to protect my child from me,&quot; Karen England, of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.capitolresource.org">Capitol Resource Institute,</a> told WND. &quot;If they want to protect children, protect them from predators.&quot;
<div>The plan is being brought forward by Assemblywoman Sally Lieber, a San Jose Democrat who has no children, England said. Specifically her proposal would prohibit parents from ever spanking their two-year-old or three-year-old children to correct their behavior.
<div>
<div>
<div>Randy Thomasson, president of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/?redir/r.asp?http://www.saveamerica.net">Campaign for Children and Families,</a> called it the wackiest bill of the year.
<div>&quot;This punish-you-if-you-spank-your-children bill is intrusive, unenforceable, and the most blatant violation of parental rights I've ever seen,&quot; he said. &quot;What's next, jail time for parents who raise their voices at their children? We already have enough legitimate laws prohibiting physical abuse of children, and this proposal is certainly not one of them.&quot;
<div>&quot;Government regulation of parents' discipline wipes out the right of parents to raise their own children. This is wrong. God gave children to parents, not to the state,&quot; Thomasson said.
<div>England agreed.
<div>&quot;There already are safeguards in place,&quot; she said. &quot;There's a difference between hitting and disciplining.&quot;
<div>Her concern, she said, was that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appeared open to the idea of intruding into people's homes.
<div>Lieber had said it was &quot;pretty hard&quot; to argue that a parent needs &quot;to beat a child three years old or younger.&quot;
<div>However, family groups said it's not an issue of being able to &quot;beat&quot; a child, but provide discipline.
<div>Lieber said the bill would prohibit &quot;any striking of a child, any corporal punishment, smacking, hitting, punching, any of that&quot; with penalties of up to a year in jail.
<div>&quot;Appropriate spanking is not 'beating' or 'abusing' a child, which is a ridiculous and offensive comparison,&quot; said Thomasson. &quot;When appropriate spanking is lovingly administered, it can help a disobedient youngster to become a well-adjusted adult who respects authority.&quot;
<div>He noted top child development experts teach that children under 15 or 18 months shouldn't be spanked because they don't understand it, but appropriate spanking of rebellious children from 2-10 &quot;is the shortest and most effective route to an attitude adjustment.&quot;
<div>&quot;Assemblywoman Lieber has stated that her reason for introducing the bill is to ban 'beating' children. There is a distinct, obvious difference between beating and spanking,&quot; said Meredith Turney, legislative liaison for Capitol Resource Institute. &quot;Beating is abuse generated by anger and frustration &ndash; it is already illegal to beat children.&quot;
<div>Brad Dacus, of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.pacificjustice.org">Pacific Justice Institute,</a> called it yet another effort to expand the reach of government.
<div>&quot;Even without this proposed new law, California gives such wide latitude to Child Protective Services that decent parents often get falsely charged with child abuse,&quot; Dacus said. &quot;How much more if the state tries to outlaw all corporal punishment on young children?&quot;
<div>He said the U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed the fundamental rights of parents to direct and control the upbringing of their children.
<div>&quot;Even parents and experts who do not favor the use of corporal punishment have expressed alarm that the government would attempt to outlaw it. For instance, researchers at UC Berkeley's Family Socialization Project have criticized the proposed law because it would seriously undermine parental authority,&quot; he said.
<div>California's legislature in the last session turned in an aggressive effort at using the power of the state to mandate families' behavior. Lawmakers in that session approved a series of &quot;sexual indoctrination&quot; bills that failed only because of gubernatorial vetoes.
<div>The plans would have required the state Board of Education to increase sensitivity to so-called &quot;discrimination&quot; by providing unlimited discretion for officials to withhold state funding from schools considered out of &quot;compliance&quot; with those requirements.
<div>A second plan would have integrated &quot;tolerance training&quot; into history and social science curriculums and started a pilot program to force a &quot;new definition&quot; of tolerance on students. That would require them to not only accept homosexuality but advocate for that.
<div>The third part of the plan would have censored any school teaching materials or activities from &quot;reflecting adversely&quot; upon homosexuals, bisexuals or transgenders.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4090</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4090</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Hundreds of Thousands of Pro-Life People March for Life in Washington</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
January 22</em><em>, 2007</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>Proving the pro-life movement is alive and well despite abortion advocates obtaining control of Congress last November, hundreds of thousands of pro-life advocates participated in the annual March for Life. The mood was optimistic and positive despite 34 years of legalized abortion since the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision.
<div>&quot;We come out here to remember lives that were lost and to let people know we all need to remember that,&quot; Tom Gill of South Bend told WSBT News. </div>
<div>&quot;The more people we can get to take notice of this issue, the more people will realize abortion is killing innocent human beings,&quot; he added.</div>
<div>&quot;We're here letting people know we are for life,&quot; added Florida teacher Sister Veronica Marinari. &quot;We are against abortion and for life at all its stages.&quot;</div>
<div>The 2006 elections dashed the hopes of pro-life advocates of continuing the pro-life agenda they've been able to enact during large portions of President Bush's tenure in office.</div>
<div>However, National Right to Life political director Karen Cross said the election results didn't mean Americans were changing their attitudes opposing abortion.</div>
<div>&quot;We know that the majority of the country is opposed to the vast majority of abortions,&quot; Cross said.</div>
<div>She pointed to a post-election poll conducted by the Polling Company firm showing 24% of voters were opposed to abortion except when the mother's life is in danger, or in cases of rape or incest. Another 14% were opposed to abortion except to save the mother's life and 14% were opposed to abortion in all circumstances.</div>
<div>&quot;Fully 52% of the country is opposed to abortion except in very rare circumstances,&quot; Cross explained.</div>
<div>Cardinal Rigali, chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee on Pro-Life Activities, told the Catholic News Service there are other reasons to rejoice despite 34 years of legalized abortion.</div>
<div>&quot;The rate and number of abortions in the United States continue to decline, most notably among teens,&quot; he said.</div>
<div>&quot;More and more citizens are coming to question abortion and to recognize -- as a starting point for deeper conversion -- that there is something radically wrong with abortion and the support given it by our laws,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Printed from: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2892.html">http://www.lifenews.com/nat2892.html</a></em><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4089</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4089</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act Reintroduced</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div>U.S. Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kansas, today reintroduced the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The legislation would require abortionists to inform mothers who seek abortions 20 weeks after fertilization that their child is able to feel pain. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>&ldquo;It is a scientific, medical fact that unborn children feel pain,&rdquo; Brownback said in announcing the legislation. &ldquo;We know that unborn children can experience pain based upon anatomical, functional, physiological and behavioral indicators that are correlated with pain in children and adults. Mothers seeking an abortion have the right to know that their unborn children can feel pain.&rdquo;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The bill would also have the abortionist recommend anesthesia for the child, if the mother chooses to continue with an abortion, in hopes it will make it clear that she is aborting a human being.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4088</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4088</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Pro-Lifers Remain Steadfast After 34 Years of Legal Abortion</strong></div>
<div>by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor</div>
<div> </div>
<div><em>Americans lament the anniversary of the decision that made killing preborn children legal -- and share a renewed commitment to protect life.</em></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thirty-four years after the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decisions <em>Roe v. Wade</em> and <em>Doe v. Bolton</em> brought unfettered access to abortion, pro-life advocates expressed their unfailing dedication to fight for women, the preborn and all human life from conception to natural death. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Nikolas T. <span>Nikas, president and general counsel of the Bioethics Defense Fund, said the &quot;brutal fact&quot; is that more than 44 million babies have been aborted since 1973.</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;Can we honestly expect things to change when so many lives have been lost, so many families affected, so many legal battles and legislative arguments made and ignored?&quot; he said. &quot;The answer is a resounding 'yes.' &quot;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>And he's right. Across the nation, as people recognize Sanctity of Human Life Week this week, they are celebrating pro-life advances at the state and federal levels through parental-notification laws; abstinence education; crisis-pregnancy programs; the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act; the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act; and the Unborn Victims of Violence Act. At the same time, they're asking the 110th Congress to pass more laws that protect life.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>On Saturday, more than 25,000 people joined in the annual <span>Walk for Life <span id="lw_1169554988_0">West Coast in </span><span id="lw_1169554988_1">San Francisco</span>.</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Vera Lord, who had an abortion when she was 34, is now a national pro-life speaker and was at <span>the event.</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;The dirty little secret behind what they call 'choice' is that the baby isn&rsquo;t the only one who dies; part of our souls dies, too,&quot; she told the <em>Christian Post</em>. &quot;We must make abortion not just illegal, but unthinkable.&quot;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>President Bush spoke today -- via telephone -- to tens of thousands of people who came to <span id="lw_1169554988_2">Washington, D.C., for the March for Life. He recognized those who have tirelessly worked to pass laws that protect the preborn and build a culture of life.</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;I want the folks assembled there to know that we're making progress,&quot; he said. &quot;We promoted adoption, supported parental-notification laws, ended federal funding for abortions overseas and are funding crisis-pregnancy centers.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;I had the privilege of signing legislation that extends legal protection to children who are born despite abortion attempts. I signed into law a ban on the cruel practice of partial-birth abortions, and we will vigorously defend that law in the courts.&quot;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Bush said embryonic humans at risk of being destroyed for their stem cells deserve protection, as well.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;Our challenge is to make sure that science serves the cause of humanity instead of the other way around,&quot; he said. &quot;I have made it clear to the Congress we must pursue medical advances in the name of life, not at the expense of it.&quot;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Carrie Gordon Earll, senior policy analyst for bioethics at Focus on the Family Action, said while Congress has made some progress, lawmakers have an obligation to continue to ensure that all life is protected.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>&quot;Leaders and members of the 110th Congress face a choice,&quot; she said. &quot;Will they be remembered as one of the most anti-life Congresses in recent history or will they take the high moral road and pass meaningful legislation that affirms the value of young human life?&quot; </div>
<div align="center"> </div>
<div>Lawmakers have the opportunity, Earll said, to make adoption tax relief permanent, to encourage childbirth over abortion and to prevent U.S. taxpayer dollars from being used to promote abortion.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>But while the members of Congress, state legislatures and the Supreme Court will change through the years, she said, &quot;the pro-life movement will remain constant in its faithful determination to be a voice for life -- born and preborn.&rdquo; </div>
<div> </div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4087</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4087</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Christian believers executed in North Korea<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">'Refusal to worship Kim Jong-il, being caught worshiping God brings harsh</font><br />
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Michael Ireland<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2007 Assist News Service </font>
<div>Reports about four Christians being executed for their faith in North Korea are circulating in the Christian media.
<div>According to Mark Kelly of Baptist Press: &quot;The Democratic People's Republic of North Korea is well-known as a country where Christians are persecuted for their faith. Because the government there keeps a tight lid on communication, however, only rarely does specific information leak out.&quot;
<div>Quoting the World Bible Translation Center's Gary Bishop in a conversation with Mission Network News, Kelly reports that one man who worked as an evangelist was executed after being caught with two Korean New Testaments in his possession.
<div>Bishop says North Korean Christians are becoming increasingly uneasy about possessing a Bible.
<div>He said: &quot;A man that's known to be an evangelist. He's probably not an evangelist to anyone other than his family members, but he was caught with two of our Korean New Testaments in his possession and he was executed for that.&quot;
<div>Kelly writes that Bishop also told Mission Network News: &quot;A woman and her grandmother were washing clothes when a New Testament fell out of the woman's clothing. Somebody reported it, and both she and her grandmother were quickly executed. And an army general who had become a believer was caught evangelizing men in his unit and was executed by a fellow officer.&quot;
<div>Kelly says Bishop told MNN that despite the oppression &ndash; or perhaps because of it &ndash; God seems to be working.
<div>Bishop said: &quot;In response to a very, very oppressive government (and) human injustices, people are looking for an answer other than their own government. And, I believe that's awakening the resilience of believers in North Korea to say, 'We have another answer. There is another way to believe.'&quot;
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>MNN reports that thousands of North Korean Christians have been killed for their faith. Many more are in work camps.
<div>According to Bishop, there's no sign of the persecution easing any. &quot;What you have is a leader who is proclaiming himself to be god. It's prescribed that they daily worship him. And, refusal to do that and being caught worshiping God just brings that kind of governmental response. And, as best we can tell, the tempo of that is not lessening.&quot;
<div>Bishop says it's obvious what that increasing pressure on Christians is doing to Bible smuggling. &quot;It becomes more and more difficult to get a person to risk their life to carry those in to North Korea.&quot; With rivers frozen, it's a prefect time to smuggle Bibles into the country.
<div>While persecution continues, World Bible Translation Center has no intention of stopping the flow of Bibles into the country. &quot;We do need to begin reprinting and get text ready as God enables people to take those in.&quot;
<div><strong>North Korea: Country in Focus</strong>
<div>Population: 22,912,177 <br />
Government: Authoritarian Social <br />
Capital: Pyongyang <br />
Type: Restricted Nation
<div>According to the World Fact Book, quoted on the VOM Australia website: &quot;Following World War II, Korea was split with the northern half coming under Communist domination and the southern portion becoming Western oriented. Kim Jong-il has ruled North Korea since his father and the country's founder, president Kim Il-sung, died in 1994. After decades of mismanagement, the North relies heavily on international food aid to feed its population, while continuing to expend resources to maintain an army of about 1 million. North Korea's long-range missile development and research into nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and massive conventional armed forces are of major concern to the international community. In December 2002, North Korea repudiated a 1994 agreement that shut down its nuclear reactors and expelled U.N. monitors, further raising fears it would produce nuclear weapons.&quot;
<div><strong>Report from United States Commission on International Religious Freedom</strong>
<div>Religious freedom remains essentially non-existent in North Korea, where the government has a policy of actively discriminating against religious believers, says the USCIRF.
<div>The group states: &quot;The North Korean state severely represses public and private religious activities. The Commission has received reports that officials have arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and sometimes executed North Korean citizens who were found to have ties with overseas Christian evangelical groups operating across the border in China, as well as those who engaged in unauthorized religious activities such as public religious expression and persuasion. Although access to updated information about North Korea remains limited, by all accounts, including according to testimony delivered at the Commission's hearing on North Korea in January 2002, there has not been any improvement in the conditions for religious freedom in the past year.&quot;
<div>In recent years, the USICRF says, the government has formed several religious organizations that it controls for the purpose of severely restricting religious activities in the country. For example, the Korean Buddhist Federation prohibits Buddhist monks from worshiping at North Korean temples. Most of the remaining temples that have escaped government destruction since the Korean War are regarded as cultural relics rather than religious sites.
<div>Similarly, the Korean Christian Federation restricts Christian activities. Following the reported wholesale destruction of over 1,500 churches during Kim Il-sung's reign (1948-1994), two Protestant churches and a Roman Catholic church, without a priest, opened in Pyongyang in 1988, even though the absence of a priest for Roman Catholics means that Mass cannot be celebrated and most sacraments cannot be performed. Several foreign residents have reported that they regularly attend services at these churches and that it is clear that whatever public religious activity exists, such as services at these churches, is staged for their benefit.
<div>The USICRF reports: &quot;Persons found carrying Bibles in public or distributing religious literature, or engaging in unauthorized religious activities such as public religious expression and persuasion are arrested and imprisoned. There continue to be reports of torture and execution of religious believers. Although the practice of imprisoning religious believers is apparently widespread, the State Department has been unable to document fully the number of religious detainees or prisoners. According to a press report, an estimated 6,000 Christians are incarcerated in &quot;Prison No. 15,&quot; located in the northern part of the country.
<div>The Commission learned from testimony at its January 2002 hearing that prisoners held on the basis of their religious beliefs are treated worse than other inmates. For example, religious prisoners, especially Christians, are reportedly given the most dangerous tasks while in prison. In addition, they are subject to constant abuse from prison officials in an effort to force them to renounce their faith. When they refuse, these religious prisoners are often beaten and sometimes tortured to death.&quot;
<div>The organization concludes: &quot;Officials have stratified North Korean society on the basis of family background and perceived loyalty to the regime into 51 specific categories. Religious adherents are by definition relegated to a lower category, receiving fewer privileges and opportunities, such as education and employment, than others. Persons in lower categories have reportedly been denied food aid. Thousands of North Koreans have fled to China in recent years. Refugees who are either forcibly repatriated or captured after having voluntarily returned to the DPRK are accused of treason; those found to have had contacts with South Koreans or Christian missionaries are subjected to severe punishment, including the death penalty.&quot; (United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, as quoted on VOM Australia website).</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4017</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4017</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Mom, meet your (unborn) child!<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Pregnancy centers use ultrasounds to give women opportunity to bond</font><br />
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Bob Unruh<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>Pro-life advocates are adopting a new tactic to reduce the demand for abortion, and it has proven so successful it already is being credited with saving tens of thousands of lives: They just introduce the mother to her child.
<div>
<div>They do it with an ultrasound machine, which can provide a real-time video image of the unborn child throughout the pregnancy, and the simple medical procedure could reduce the demand by mothers for abortion to a fraction of its current level, according to Kim Conroy, director of sanctity of human life issues for the Colorado Springs-based <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.family.org/">Focus on the Family.</a>
<div>That group about three years ago launched its national <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.heartlink.org/">Option Ultrasound</a> program which helps provide the expensive machines to pregnancy centers, helps train people to accurately run the procedures, and helps advance the status of the centers from counseling offices to medical clinics.
<div>The first goal of the ultrasound is to confirm a pregnancy, something abortion clinics use the same technology to reveal (although standard abortion clinic policy is to <em>prevent</em> the mother from seeing the image under any circumstance), but then something else happens in a pregnancy crisis center.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;In the course of that, this miraculous thing that happens is this woman comes face to face with her unborn child,&quot; Conroy told WND. &quot;Before it was theoretical information, but now it's 'This is not a blob of tissue, it's not some undefined mass,'&quot; she said. &quot;We want women to have all the facts that they need to make a good healthy decision for themselves and their baby.
<div>&quot;We have had incredible results reported back, both anecdotally, where centers have told us 'We have had this most phenomenal experience,' and statistically,&quot; Conroy said. &quot;Eighty-seven percent of the women who are at risk for abortion who undergo both counseling within the centers and ultrasounds are changing their minds and making a statement of their intention to carry their babies.&quot;
<div>&quot;This is just a huge response,&quot; she said. &quot;We're projecting that up to this date, 31,000 babies may have received life because of these centers' intervention.&quot;
<div>And that's with 281 ultrasound units installed through the program so far. The program's goal is to have 650 operating by the year 2010.
<div>&quot;Women deserve factual information regarding their pregnancy. There are significant health risks with abortion, and at the very least they have a right to know the truth regarding this risky procedure from professionals who will not benefit financially from their decision. They also need to know there are positive alternatives for them and their babies,&quot; Conroy said
<div>&quot;Women have been fed a lie by abortionists,&quot; she said. &quot;Those who are considering an abortion need to know the emotional and physical toll this procedure could have on them &ndash; and they deserve the chance to see their baby face to face before they make this life-changing decision.&quot;
<div>In conjunction with launching ultrasound outreaches, the Focus program also helps upgrade counseling centers to fully-accredited medical clinics, to meet licensing requirements and to establish the policies and procedures that will make them effective in long-term ministry efforts.
<div>The program pays about 80 percent of the cost of the machines and personnel training, so that local officials maintain their participation by raising some of the funds. The machines themselves range in cost from $22,000 to $75,000, depending on the exact features required.
<div>The fundraising hasn't been difficult, Conroy said. &quot;All we have done is sent messages to our donors, saying 'Here are some results&hellip;' We don't ask donors for money, they offer it. That's one of the reasons we started to give grants for conversions. The money was offered,&quot; she said.
<div>It usually is a process of months for a center to be approved for the grants that are involved, because Focus, Conroy said, &quot;Wants them there for the long haul. They have to be able to meet all the program requirements, and that includes looking down the road two or three years and preparing for that.&quot;
<div>The <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.nifla.org/">National Institute of Family and Life Advocates</a> also works on making ultrasound machines and training available under a plan called The Life Choice Project.
<div>Officials there said centers that convert to medical clinic status see an increase in the number of patients seen, and an increase in the number of abortion-minded patients.
<div>&quot;Ultrasound opens 'a window to the womb' to the mother in a crisis pregnancy. Ultrasound introduces this mother to her unborn child and enables her to bond with her baby,&quot; President Tom Glessner said.
<div>Dr. Walt Larimore, from Focus on the Family, said the procedure isn't hard to understand: A probe is placed on the mother's abdomen, and emits harmless sound waves that hit and bounce off the baby. The reflected waves are read by a computer as an image.
<div>The older technology is called B-mode and the two-dimensional images are what most people recognize. They are black-and-white and show real-time movement. A 3-D technology provides more lifelike images but are not transmitted in real-time mode.
<div>The newest technology is 4-D, which takes the 3-D images and shows them in real time.
<div>Dr. Curtis Harris, with the Christian Medical Association, said studies provide the documentation that a woman considering an abortion who sees an ultrasound picture of her unborn child &quot;is far less likely to have an abortion.&quot;
<div>And Shari Richard, a pioneer in using ultrasounds in pregnancy centers, said it provides an opportunity.
<div>&quot;When a mom and dad see the baby's movement and heartbeat, there is no more powerful moment. They bond. The baby becomes real. The sonogram allows us to show women the baby and then discuss the long-term consequences of abortion,&quot; she said.
<div>Focus noted that only a few hundred of the 2,300 pregnancy resource centers around the country were able to have an ultrasound machine to use when the Focus program was launched.
<div>&quot;Focus on the Family is not content simply to argue for the protection of the unborn. We are now convinced that God is calling us to take an even more dramatic step. Our board of directors has authorized us to help provide ultrasound equipment to as many centers as possible and help shepherd them through the training and implementation process,&quot; Focus founder James Dobson said at that time.
<div>One group of centers in the Chicago area currently is working on the acquisition of ultrasound machines. Mary Strom, executive director of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.womens-center.org/">Women's Center,</a> says her three facilities are in Chicago itself, in Evergreen Park on the south side, and in Des Plaines to the northwest. They all are strategically located to be near or even in the same building as abortion clinics.
<div>&quot;We are a neutral image, where we really just outreach to women seeking abortions, and counsel them in a way that is simply presenting them with the truth and facts. We try to help identify the crisis they're going through that might cause them to consider an abortion as their only choice,&quot; she told WND.
<div>But since opening their first office in 1984, the centers have contributed to saving the lives of 30,000 children, she said.
<div>The organization also provides an opportunity for mothers to get clothing and other important items that are donated &ndash; officials gave away about $800,000 in goods last year &ndash; and also sponsors a Christmas party each year for mothers and their children. More than 1,300 people showed up last month for that event.
<div>The centers also continually receive information from mothers whose children were saved through their counseling. &quot;One of the moms stopped this past year, whose son now is serving in Iraq. He's 18 or 19 years old and she brought us a picture of him,&quot; Strom said.
<div>Right now when the case suggests a need, the centers pay for women to have ultrasounds at other medical clinics. But that requires women to keep another appointment, and some simply don't, she said. Also the centers follow the moral teachings of the Catholic Church, and cannot be assured that a technician operating an outside ultrasound shares those beliefs, she said.
<div>But the fundraising and expansion efforts, she believes, will be worth it. &quot;It's a great difference between seeing a picture of someone or seeing the person. If you could see your own baby sucking his thumb, and his heart beating. It's just better to see that before they've made the decision,&quot; Strom said.
<div>Robin Fuller serves as executive director of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.pregnancy-care.com/">Pregnancy Care Center</a> of Grants Pass, Ore., where approval came through just weeks ago for an ultrasound. She's worked for a number of years with pregnancy crisis centers, and recalls when offering a free pregnancy test would draw women who may be in a position to consider alternatives to an abortion.
<div>Now those tests are available in dollar stores, but ultrasounds are not.
<div>&quot;We know Planned Parenthood has used ultrasounds, but they never show the picture to the girl. She would then see that it's a life,&quot; she said. &quot;So it's a very common sense step for us to take to offer ultrasounds.&quot;
<div>&quot;We hear story after store from centers where women may already have gone to an abortion clinic, but they wouldn't let them see the ultrasound. We want them to see the baby on a big screen TV on the wall,&quot; she told WND.
<div>At some of the dozen locations run by <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.expectantmothercare.org/">ExpectantMotherCare.org</a> in the New York area, ultrasound machines have been in use for several years.
<div>Chris Slattery, who manages the sites, said the technology always is very effective.
<div>&quot;Ultrasound gives us an advantage,&quot; he said. &quot;We do it because it gives us another shot at turning a mother around. It is no substitute for good counseling, real support, help and encouragement, but it is a valuable tool. I wouldn't do without it.&quot;
<div>He presently has three ultrasound machines operating at his centers, and he's considering adding a few more to help show the women the truth.
<div>&quot;We tend to turn around about two-thirds of abortion-minded women,&quot; he said. &quot;The vast majority are planning on an abortion when they come in.&quot;
<div>Some, however, won't change their minds under any circumstances. In a metropolitan area where there are 100,000 abortions a year, and millions spent by abortion clinics advertising their businesses, he said pro-life clinics and counselors need to use every tool available.
<div>That's a reason that his counseling centers and clinics are located near abortion clinics. He said his facility is across the street from Planned Parenthood in the Bronx and in the same building as Planned Parenthood in Brooklyn.
<div>He said many woman arriving at his centers fear childbirth and motherhood more than abortion. The ultrasound can give them a higher level of comfort with their future. &quot;They have to come out fearing abortion more, and we explain in detail the physical, psychological and spiritual side effects of abortion,&quot; he said.
<div>&quot;When a woman begins to fear an abortion more than her baby, then she begins to bond with the baby,&quot; he said.
<div>He also said training technicians to run the machines is critical, and his organization is preparing soon to launch a program with an ultrasound machine built into a vehicle to make it mobile.
<div>He said he's waiting to see the results &ndash; whether he'll be able to find locations for the vehicle where people can keep appointments, or whether people will make a spontaneous decision to have a test if they see the opportunity.
<div>A Focus analysis of a Congressional Record entry on the abortion argument makes it clear the attitudes the clinics sometimes face, when not even an ultrasound would make a difference.
<div>The exchange was between Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.,
<div>During debate over federal restrictions on the gruesome partial-birth abortion procedure, Santorum asked Boxer: &quot;[Do] you agree, once the child is born, [and] separated from the mother, that the child is protected by the Constitution and cannot be killed[?] Do you agree with that?&quot;
<div>&quot;I think that when you bring your baby home, when your baby is born &hellip; the baby belongs to your family and has rights,&quot; she said.
<div>The Focus analysis by Larimore noted: &quot;Think for a moment about that disturbing statement that is now immortalized in the Congressional Record. Though she did not say so, the position taken by Sen. Boxer would clearly support the murder of an infant until, and if, the mother and father decide that they want to keep it. As long as the baby is still in the hospital, however, he or she has no rights whatsoever &ndash; not even the right not to be killed.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4015</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4015</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Planned Parenthood access<br />
to public purse in jeopardy<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Rapists protected when rules ignored &ndash;<br />
grounds for clinics to lose Title X money</font><br />
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Bob Unruh<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>Al Capone, one of the biggest influences in the annals of American crime, was brought down by the paperwork requirements of the federal tax system. Now pro-life activists believe the nation's abortion industry could face a similar collapse, all because of the paper trail that they believe shows the industry has failed to follow the rules and file the proper reports.
<div>&quot;It's a simple audit function,&quot; Mark Crutcher, the chief of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.lifedynamics.com/">Life Dynamics,</a> told WND. &quot;All you have to do is go into a state &hellip; and look at Title X applications and service reports. Look for all the girls they provided treatment to &ndash; pregnancy tests, STD treatments, abortion or birth control. If they provided one of those services to a girl beneath the state's age of consent, that triggers a report.&quot;
<div>&quot;Then go to the &hellip; Department of Child Protective services (and look at reports). If those numbers don't match, you've got a violation,&quot; he said.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>He said his research shows that the abortion industry &quot;services&quot; provided to underage girls across the nation outnumber the &quot;reports&quot; of suspicion of assault on a child by 11-1 &ndash; under the best of circumstances. &quot;And most reports are not by providers; they're made by pediatricians and emergency room physicians,&quot; he said.
<div>So what's the big deal with the numbers aligning &ndash; or not? Money, money and more money. Millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions of dollars. And the Title X funding mechanism for the nation's abortion industry that requires industry members to follow state laws, including those pesky reporting requirements &ndash; <em>or lose the money.</em>
<div>Crutcher, in a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.childpredators.com/ReadReport.cfm">Life Dynamics report,</a> said the information about the reports comes from government sources, medical journals, independent researchers and the abortion industry itself.
<div>&quot;The fact that these family planning facilities are in clear violation of child abuse or statutory rape reporting requirements creates an environment for us to demand that their funding be immediately cut off,&quot; Crutcher said. &quot;Given their heavy reliance on state and federal tax dollars, losing that money would be nothing less than a financial catastrophe for these organizations.
<div>&quot;Better yet, their failure to adhere to state and federal law means that funds allocated in past years were obtained fraudulently. Because of that, we may be able to force a return of those funds. Needless to say that could literally cripple the entire abortion industry,&quot; he concluded.
<div>That means, according to Crutcher and Troy Newman of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.operationrescue.org">Operation Rescue,</a> if the report numbers don't line up, the abortion industry could be liable to return hundreds of millions of dollars in past and current payments.
<div>&quot;In all 50 states, sexual activity with underage children is illegal. Also, every state mandates that if a healthcare worker has reason to suspect that an underage girl is being sexually abused, they are required by law to report that information to a designated law enforcement or child protective services agency. That agency is then responsible to investigate the possibility that the child may be the victim of sexual abuse or statutory rape,&quot; according to Life Dynamics.
<div>A pregnancy in an underage girl is evidence of sexual abuse, and &quot;any healthcare worker who has contact with a pregnant underage girl has an obligation to initiate a report to the state,&quot; the report said.
<div>Abortion industry lawyers repeatedly have claimed that their clients follow the law, including a special case in Kansas recently where a local prosecutor held a news conference to say late-term abortionist George Tiller had followed those reporting requirements, even though a case that had been brought against him didn't make that accusation.
<div>Government budgets show that in 2004 alone U.S. taxpayers allocated more than $280 million for birth control functions, focusing mostly on abortion services, including an estimate of between $50 million and $60 million just for Planned Parenthood, the industry's biggest chain of businesses.
<div>&quot;If you're not following state law, you're not entitled to Title X funds,&quot; Newman told WND. &quot;As soon as you defund abortion clinics, they dry up and blow away.&quot;
<div>The U.S. &quot;is funding the nation's largest perpetrators of child-murder-by-abortion, Planned Parenthood (report murdering over 200,000 unborn children annually by surgical abortion alone), through both Medicaid (Title XIX) and Title X, with over $50 million per year through each program,&quot; said Steve Lefemine, who was the Constitution Party's candidate for Congress in South Carolina's 2nd District.
<div>Crutcher, who has spent years opposing the abortion industry agenda, said the industry used to be vulnerable to claims of malpractice from patients who were injured and left with permanent injuries.
<div>But tort reform made such lawsuits negligible for the industry, and now he believes one option for pro-life advocates will be to have parents whose children have been victimized in abortion clinics to come forward, document their cases and possibly sue the clinics &ndash; or join a class-action case against the industry.
<div>&quot;We need a nation-wide well-funded effort to basically recruit parents whose children have been the victims of abortion clinics' failure to adhere to state reporting laws. There are literally hundreds of thousands of these situations over the years,&quot; he said.
<div>The clinics have a vested interest in not having to report those child rape or child assault cases; the men who are doing the assaults are paying the fees for the abortions, but the price for the girls &quot;is extremely high.&quot;
<div>&quot;What happens when a 13-year-old girl goes into a Planned Parenthood facility. She's demonstrating that she's sexually active, obviously. According to the most reliable statistics out there now, (of girls 15 and younger) the chances are 60-to-80 percent that she's sexually active with an adult,&quot; Crutcher said.
<div>&quot;If this young lady is given an abortion, birth control or anything, and the health care provider fails to meet the state's mandatory reporting laws, the child is sent right back into the hands of the rapist,&quot; he said.
<div>&quot;The behavior of these abortion clinics, as we proved in our undercover survey, makes it absolutely clear they're protecting the men, not the girls,&quot; he said. &quot;The result is that a child predator now is given the knowledge that he can get away with it.&quot;
<div>That <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.childpredators.com/">undercover project involved Life Dynamics arranging for an adult volunteer to pose as a 13-year-old and call every Planned Parenthood clinic in the United States.</a> She posed as that young teen, pregnant by her 22-year-old boyfriend, and asked for help because she didn't want her parents to know. Almost without exception the recorded responses from the clinics advise her not only how to obtain an abortion without her parents' knowledge, but also how to protect that adult boyfriend who is guilty in any state of statutory rape on child.
<div>&quot;While many clinic workers can be heard on the tapes telling the caller that this situation was unlawful and that they were legally mandated to report it to the state, 91 percent of these facilities still agreed to illegally conceal it,&quot; Life Dynamics reported. &quot;So it's no wonder that abortion clinics are refusing to cooperate with law enforcement efforts to investigate child abuse. In Kansas, abortion clinic representatives have even gone so far as to state in published reports that they <em>will not comply</em> with the state's mandatory reporting laws.&quot;
<div>Crutcher said in his investigation, clinic workers even have been taped telling a person they believe to be a pregnant 13-year-old to have her &quot;boyfriend,&quot; a statutory rapist, take her across state lines without her parents' knowledge for an abortion.
<div>&quot;What we have is a conspiracy to cover up the crimes that are being committed across the nation by sexual predators on behalf of the abortion cartel. Their love for money, their love for abortion is greater than their care for what actually is happening [to children],&quot; said Newman.
<div>Former Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline, who battled the secrecy of the abortion industry for years, did obtain some records prior to the end of his term in office earlier this month, and confirmed that he had sent to various local prosecutors information regarding 25 underage girls who, abortion clinic records show, probably were assaulted or molested or raped.
<div>Those cases are being evaluated by those prosecutors now, but Newman said the tragedy there is that stalling tactics utilized by abortion business interests delayed Kline's investigation long enough that 28 other cases were lost because of the statute of limitations.
<div>&quot;That's disturbing. There's an obstruction of justice going on,&quot; he said.
<div>&quot;When a 14-year-old or a 15-year-old walks into an abortion clinic pregnant, that's evidence of abuse. It is by definition evidence of abuse. Slap the cuffs on them and figure out the details later,&quot; he said.
<div>Crutcher said the &quot;circle-the-wagons&quot; attitude about the abortion industry protecting its own interests was what he saw happening recently with Kline in Kansas, when the attorney general sought documentation from two abortion clinics that he believed could show evidence of crimes.
<div>He was defeated in his bid for re-election when abortion interests donated heavily to his opponent's campaign, and a special interest group with ties to prominent Wichita abortionist Tiller sent out a series of mailings severely critical of Kline.
<div>His opponent at the same time publicly made campaign statements that he didn't see the need to investigate abortion clinics in Kansas, and has fulfilled a campaign promise by firing a special prosecutor Kline had appointed to oversee a case he had assembled against Tiller.
<div>Kline needed to appoint the special prosecutor, Don McKinney of Wichita, because when he filed a series of 30 criminal charges against Tiller, the local prosecutor, Nola Foulston, argued the state's top law enforcement official had no authority to file those counts in her district if she didn't want him to, and worked with a judge to have them dismissed.
<div>&quot;The concern clearly is not the girl, but the abortionist,&quot; Crutcher said. &quot;They filed lawsuits, stonewalled, they refused to adhere to court orders that were issued; all just to keep AG Kline from investigating alleged crimes.&quot;
<div>&quot;Any time you see an entity that just moves heaven and earth in order to stop an investigation, you know they've got something to hide,&quot; Crutcher said.
<div>The potential loss of all Title X funding, especially since it could be made retroactive, would be enough to force that &quot;circle-the-wagons&quot; mentality, he noted.
<div>Newman also said he has a tape recording of abortionists, including Colorado's Warren Hern, discussing how they cannot raise prices for abortions, which run generally from $325 to $400, because every time there's a price hike, business drops off.
<div>At the same time costs including insurance, salaries, rent and the like have gone up over the years, leaving public funding often a lifeline that keeps such clinics open.
<div>Crutcher also said a second attack on the abortion industry also could come from private litigation. &quot;To capitalize on this, Life Dynamics is developing several exciting new litigation strategies and support services to be used by attorneys who represent the girls and parents victimized,&quot; Crutcher said.
<div>He said the firestorm involving pedophile priests within the Catholic Church is well-known. &quot;Already, dioceses have either settled or lost lawsuits totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, and some have been forced to close schools and sell property to pay off these awards. If you look at these suits, what you find is &hellip; they are being sued for negligence because they allegedly knew about the sexual abuse of children and failed to report it to authorities.&quot;
<div>Lawsuits against abortion providers who give an underage girl an abortion, then fail to do the necessary reports so a law enforcement agency could investigate, and the child was raped again, could prove devastating for the businesses.
<div>&quot;What we need is parents whose children have been injured to come forward and file suits against the abortion providers who failed to protect the children,&quot; Crutcher said. &quot;They need to be held accountable. When you've had almost 50 million abortions, one-third on girls under 18, we know there are hundreds of thousands of potential plaintiffs.&quot;
<div>The stigma of being assaulted, sometimes, is what holds people back from filing complaints. He said there was a case where a young girl overdosed on drugs given by an abortionist, and was left, essentially, in a vegetative state.
<div>The father told Crutcher that if had been any other circumstance, he would &quot;nail this guy's hide to the wall,&quot; but he didn't want to pursue a case because the abortion would have to become public knowledge.
<div>A third attack flank already is being implemented by Life Dynamics, which confirmed it is alerting attorneys general and district attorneys across the nation about the activities within the abortion industry.
<div>&quot;Failing to report an abortion may suggest that they are only guilty of concealing a crime that has already been committed. But providing birth control to a child without reporting might be interpreted as participating in an ongoing or future crime,&quot; Crutcher said. &quot;If that is so, the issue is no longer simply a failure to report child sexual abuse or statutory rape, but actual complicity in child sexual abuse or statutory rape.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4014</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4014</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>N.C. lawsuit seeking use of Quran for courtroom oaths gets green light</strong></div>
<div>Gary D. Robertson / Associated Press</div>
<div>RALEIGH, N.C. -- A lawsuit filed by the ACLU and a Muslim woman seeking the use of the Quran or other non-Christian texts in addition to the Bible for courtroom oaths should be allowed to go forward, the state Court of Appeals ruled today.</div>
<div>A trial court dismissed the lawsuit in December 2005, saying there was no controversy that warranted litigation. The three-judge appeals panel disagreed, but did not comment on the merits of the case.</div>
<div>The lawsuit, filed in July 2005, claims the state law that says witnesses must take an oath on the Bible is unconstitutional because it favors Christianity over other religions. State law allows witnesses preparing to testify in court to take their oath either by laying a hand over a &quot;Holy Scripture,&quot; or by saying &quot;so help me God&quot; without the use of a religious book.</div>
<div>Plaintiff Sydiah Mateen claims she had a request to place her hand on the Quran denied in 2003. Several Jewish members of the North Carolina chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union also have said they would prefer to swear upon the Old Testament, one of the religious texts of their faith, Chief Judge John Martin wrote in the appeal panel's unanimous decision.</div>
<div>&quot;The government cannot favor one set of religious values over another and must allow all individuals of faith to be sworn in on the holy text that is in accordance with their faith,&quot; said Jennifer Rudinger, director of the state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.</div>
<div>The issue surfaced after Muslims from the Al-Ummil Ummat Islamic Center in Greensboro tried to donate copies of the Quran to Guilford County's two courthouses. Two Guilford judges declined to accept the texts, saying an oath on the Quran is not a legal oath under state law.</div>
<div>The Attorney General's Office is reviewing the ruling but hasn't decided whether to appeal, spokeswoman Noelle Talley said.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4013</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4013</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>''Thought Crimes'' Bill Re-introduced in Congress     1/19/2007<br />
By Sarah Rode</div>
<div>Liberals seeking to enshrine </div>
<div>A North Carolina man was recently arrested on suspicion of decapitating his 4-year-old daughter. In New York, three teenaged girls were arrested after brutally beating a 13-year-old girl and posting the video footage on YouTube and MySpace. And a former Penn State defensive lineman was arrested recently for the murder of a student who was stabbed 93 times during an apparent robbery.
<div>
<div>As heinous and horrific as these crimes may seem, according to a bill recently re-introduced in the new liberal Congress, the penalties will be greater and harsher if those same crimes are committed against homosexuals. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) has introduced H.R. 254 known as the &quot;David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007&quot;. The bill currently has no cosponsors and it has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
<div>
<div>It may seem surprising that liberals in Congress would support H.R. 254 which mandates harsher penalties for criminals. They have fought vehemently against capital punishment and in favor of improving prison conditions for terrorists in the past. Recall that Rep. Lee was one Member who <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160688,00.html">called for the closure of Guantanamo Bay prison facilities</a> because they were not pleasant enough for terrorists.
<div>
<div>If you're tempted to think that there's been a change of heart regarding punishment of criminal behavior, think again. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee is beholden to the radically pro-homosexual Human Rights Campaign for their endorsement of her during the November 2006 elections. She scored 100% in the group's voter scorecard for the 109th Congress.
<div>
<div>This bill isn't just another cog in the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cwfa.org/articles/12147/CWA/misc/index.htm">homosexual agenda</a> machine. This legislation actually sends the message that it is more hateful to kill a homosexual than a little child. For instance, under this bill, the North Carolina man previously mentioned would receive a much harsher sentence if he were to be convicted of decapitating a homosexual rather than his 4-year-old daughter. This defies logic.
<div>
<div>Laws similar to H.R. 254 implemented worldwide have had a chilling effect on freedoms of religion and speech. In Canada, pastors and teachers who promote traditional marriage from the pulpit and in publications have found themselves in court for &quot;hate speech.&quot; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.narth.com/docs/canteacher.html">Chris Kempling</a>, a teacher in British Columbia, was found guilty and suspended from his job for submitting an article in support of marriage between a man and woman.
<div>
<div><em>U.S. News &amp; World Report</em> notes, &quot;The Swedish chancellor of justice said any reference to the Bible's stating that homosexuality is sinful might be a criminal offense, and a Pentecostal minister is already facing charges.&quot; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cbn.com/CBNNews/CWN/091004sweden.aspx">Pastor Ake Green</a> was arrested and given jail time for preaching a sermon <em>in his own church</em> regarding the Biblical view of homosexuality.
<div>
<div>Matt Barber, CWA's Policy Director for Cultural Issues, believes that this bill represents a clear and present danger to religious liberty. &quot;This bill sets the table, and places us on a slippery slope toward religious persecution. If it becomes law, it can easily be misapplied and used as a hammer against free speech. So-called 'hate crimes' laws are already being used in the UK, Canada - and even right here in America - to intimidate and silence people who honor the Biblical model of human sexuality, and who value the sanctity of marriage,&quot; said Barber. &quot;If they speak out against homosexual behavior, they are somehow guilty of 'hate speech.' This bill attempts to get into the mind of the offender and penalize him for his thoughts. Are the bill's proponents going to now lobby for a Federal Department of Thought Enforcement?
<div>
<div>&quot;H.R. 254 elevates one group of Americans above others, creating a special class of victims. All things being equal, it means that if a 5-foot-2-inch grandmother is violently attacked on the street, she is less worthy of justice than the 6-foot-4-inch homosexual man who is attacked by the same assailant.&quot;
<div>
<div>The reintroduction of this bill is yet another attempt by liberals to slalom down the slippery slope of granting extra protection under the law to those who choose to engage in the homosexual lifestyle. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4012</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4012</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font face="Palatino," color="#000000" size="+2">Speech limited if someone is 'annoyed'</font><br />
<font face="Palatino," color="#000000" size="+1">Constitutionality of ordinance applied to abortion protesters challenged</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>A Cleveland law that allowed the arrest of a man on a sidewalk in front of an abortion business because someone inside was &quot;annoyed&quot; with the sound of the business owner's voice is being appealed by a public interest law firm.
<div>The appeal filed by the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.telladf.org">Alliance Defense Fund</a> comes in a case involving Hugh Caughan, who twice was cited by Cleveland police after using a portable tape recorder to play a 911 recording of the voice of the owner of the Center for Women's Health, Martin Ruddock.
<div>The tape contains a recording of Ruddock, an abortionist at the clinic, speaking to a 911 operator after complications occurred during an abortion procedure on a 30-year-old woman. &ldquo;I just can&rsquo;t stop the bleeding. I can&rsquo;t see what I&rsquo;m doing, and I want her out of here,&rdquo; Ruddock says on the tape.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>Gaughan played the recording as a way of educating women about the life-threatening dangers associated with abortion, according to the ADF, but twice was cited by police for violating a city ordinance, and now no longer can play it because he fears further arrests.
<div>The law, however, clearly violates a U.S. Supreme Court conclusion that descriptions such as &quot;annoying&quot; actually set no standard and therefore cannot be enforced, according to the law firm.
<div>&quot;The interesting thing about this is he was regularly playing this tape, and police officers were out there every time he did it. They never changed the volume and never were arrested until there was a complaint from someone inside the clinic,&quot; ADF Senior Legal Counsel Jeff Shafer told WND.
<div>He's coordinating the appeal of the case, which requests a review by the full U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.
<div>A second plaintiff, Thomas Raddell, the Cleveland area director of Operation Save America, also is involved in the case because he also has played the tape outside the clinic although he never was cited or arrested on the occasions he was there.
<div>The lawsuit originally was filed against the city in 2005, but lower court rulings have upheld the ordinances, even though Shafer said it leaves entirely unclear what would be considered legal and what would not.
<div>&quot;How on earth are you able to tell what's legitimate or not,&quot; he asked, because what is &quot;annoying&quot; to one person isn't necessarily annoying to another. And someone with an objection to the message of speech may object to having it heard at all.
<div>The U.S. Supreme Court has found, according to the latest appeal, that such statutes must be struck down. In a case in which a Cincinnati ordinance that banned people from gathering on a sidewalk and &quot;annoying&quot; passers-by, the court ruled:
<div>&quot;Conduct that annoys some people does not annoy others. Thus, the ordinance is vague, not in the sense that it requires a person to conform his conduct to an imprecise but comprehensive normative standard, but rather in the sense that no standard of conduct is specified at all. As a result, 'men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning.'&quot;
<div>&quot;The Constitution forbids municipalities from regulating the speech of its citizens through vague and overbroad ordinances,&quot; said Shafer. &quot;The stifling of our clients' pro-life speech through the enforcement of Cleveland's hopelessly vague 'sound device' statute illustrates well why such laws are constitutionally condemned.&quot;
<div>The city's regulations regarding sound devices give as a cause for action the &quot;annoying&quot; nature of the sound.
<div>&quot;If the City of Cleveland wants to regulate sound within its jurisdiction, it is welcome to do so,&quot; Shafer said. &quot;But it may not accomplish this goal through imprecise laws which serve as instruments of discrimination.&quot;
<div>ADF is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. Its lawyers argue that city laws cannot be used to keep people silent simply because &quot;they have a viewpoint that some consider controversial.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4011</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4011</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Senate Heeds Grassroots Pressure</font></strong></div>
<div>by Pete Winn, associate editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Now the battle over congressional accountability moves to Nancy Pelosi&rsquo;s chamber.</em>
<div>
<div>Republican senators and a few Democrats voted Thursday night to reject an attempt to silence grassroots groups. </div>
<div>The Senate adopted an amendment offered by Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, to strip Section 220 -- the so-called &quot;grassroots-lobbying provision&quot; -- from S.1, an ethics-reform bill.  </div>
<div>&quot;This is a clear victory for the Constitution, the First Amendment and grassroots organizations who want their voices to be heard by Congress,&quot; Bennett said.</div>
<div>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he was pleased with the vote outcome.</div>
<div>&quot;I am an advocate for reforming the way business is done in Washington, but I believe that we should do so without silencing the voices of ordinary citizens,&quot; he said.</div>
<div>Focus on the Family Action Chairman Dr. James C. Dobson, said Thursday&rsquo;s vote affirmed the importance of grassroots activism.</div>
<div>&quot;The very thing that Section 220 would have denied &ndash; namely, the rights of citizens to know what's going on in Washington and to have an impact on the bills considered there &ndash; is what fueled this victory,&rdquo; he said</div>
<div>Gary Schneeberger, public policy media director for Focus on the Family Action, said more than 100,000 of the group&rsquo;s constituents signed a petition to Congress letting their views be known on the issue.</div>
<div>A satisfying vote, a disappointing tally</div>
<div>Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said he is disappointed that more senators did not heed the people's outcry. </div>
<div>&quot;It's astounding that 43 senators voted against allowing groups to inform their constituents about what they're up to with our tax dollars,&quot; he said. &quot;It doesn't show much faith in our citizens to shut down information about their own government.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Amanda Banks, federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said the vote would not have been possible without seven Senate Democrats who did heed the people's call -- and crossed party lines to side with Republicans. They are: Max Baucus, D-Mont..; Evan Bayh, D-In.; Byron Dorgan, D-N.D.; Kent Conrad, D-N.D.; Ben Nelson, D-Neb.; Mary Landrieu, D-La., and Ken Salazar, D-Colo.</div>
<div>Grassroots groups, meanwhile, said their attention now turns to the House of Representatives, where the same fight is looming. </div>
<div>&ldquo;Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats are reportedly planning an assault of their own,&rdquo; Dobson said. What is being illustrated here is a passion by congressional liberals to consolidate power and operate within a cloak of secrecy. It is unconscionable and unconstitutional. We will not be intimated by attempts to criminalize those who would hold Washington accountable. The right to do so is as American as apple pie.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Last year, then-Rep. Nancy Pelosi introduced a bill that contained the same type of sweeping regulations the Senate considered and rejected.  </div>
<div>The language of Section 220 originated last year when Sens. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., and Carl Levin, D-Mich., unsuccessfully attempted to insert it into the Homeland Security bill. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., decided to include it his omnibus ethics and lobbying bill, S.1. </div>
<div>Liberals tried a similar tactic in 1996. </div>
<div>&quot;There are powerful interest groups that are pushing for this type of legislation,&quot; said Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee. &quot;They believe that there's too much political discourse in this country -- that it confuses people, and that voters and constituents are rather simple-minded and need to be protected from all of the communications. That way, lawmakers wouldn't be distracted by all of these 'contacts' and they would listen to the 'truly wise people' -- like the think-tanks that are cooking up these bills.&quot; </div>
<div><strong>TAKE ACTION</strong><br />
1. Please thank your senators, if they voted yes on the Bennett amendment striking Section 220 of S.1. If you are a CitizenLink Daily Update subscriber, click on the blue &quot;Take Action&quot; button in the e-mail to be automatically logged in to our Action Center. Otherwise, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/dotnet/WebPublish/controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&amp;Definition=Home&amp;XSL=Home&amp;SV_Section=Home">click on this link</a>.<br />
<br />
2. Wherever you reside, please contact Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, for sponsoring the amendment to kill the onerous provision and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell for his leadership on the amendment.</div>
<div>Click here to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.senate.gov/~bennett/contact/emailmain.html">e-mail Sen. Bennett</a>.<br />
<br />
Click here to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://mcconnell.senate.gov/contact_form.cfm">e-mail Sen. McConnell</a>.</div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4010</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4010</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Beyond Roe</font></strong></div>
By Gary Bauer<br />
<font size="1">Published January 18, 2007</font><br />
Jailand Adams will never make a New Year's resolution. On Dec. 5, Jailand's mother was charged with first-degree murder for allegedly placing her 3-month-old son in a clothes dryer and turning it on. The boy died after receiving third degree burns and suffering blunt force trauma. <br />
    Paris Talley met a similar fate last year when, according to forensic experts, she died after experiencing high-heat internal injuries and hyperthermia. After investigating for over a year, authorities charged Paris's mother with aggravated murder. Her weapon: a microwave oven. <br />
    The headlines have become all too familiar and range from the disturbingly banal: &quot;Life for man who killed baby,&quot; to the appallingly callous: &quot;Mom says she didn't mean to throw baby at boyfriend.&quot; <br />
    Of course, it was not supposed to be this way. <br />
    The conventional wisdom has always been that legalized abortion leads to fewer unwanted children, and thus to happier, healthier and more stable families. This view went a long way in helping abortion advocates to justify their support of abortion-on-demand. It also helped sooth the consciences of frightened young women and men and cajole a skeptical public. <br />
    Unfortunately, as economist John Kenneth Galbraith once wrote, the enemy of the conventional wisdom is not ideas but the march of events. And when it comes to the relationship between abortion and child abuse, the march of events has proved a formidable enemy indeed. In fact, since the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized all abortions, child abuse has risen, and precipitously so. Consider these statistics: <br />
    m Since 1973, reports of child abuse have increased five-fold. <br />
    m Today, nearly 1 million children are abused or neglected each year, 80 percent by their parents. <br />
    m The Department of Health and Human Services estimated that 1,500 children died from abuse or neglect in 2003, and that the majority of the victims were under the age of four. <br />
    While a portion of the increase in child abuse is certainly due to better reporting, experts agree these figures reflect a significant trend toward higher rates of abuse. As Shay Bilchik, president of Child Welfare League of America, told ABC News last year: &quot;It is truly an epidemic. And we've seen the tremendous increase over the last 20 years.&quot; <br />
    What's more, studies have found a significant link between abortion and child abuse. Researchers at Bowling State University recently discovered that women who had undergone an abortion are 2.4 times more likely to physically abuse their children. So, is it possible that not only does abortion fail to decrease the incidence of child abuse, but that it in fact increases its prevalence? Any empiricist would reflexively respond with the statistical adage: correlation does not imply causation. And it's true. Just because child abuse rates surged when abortion became legal doesn't necessarily mean abortion causes child abuse. <br />
    But it's curious that at a time when contraception is widely and cheaply available, and a third of all pregnancies end in abortion, child abuse continues to rise. <br />
    While the direct effect of abortion on child abuse may be unclear, one thing can be said conclusively: Abortion has not been the panacea for child abuse that many of its proponents predicted. <br />
    In recent years, Americans seem ambivalent about human life. Polls show a significant majority describes itself as &quot;pro-life,&quot; and there is awe and respect for life-saving medical breakthroughs such as miraculous surgeries in the womb. At the same time, abortions of children older than those operated upon are vigorously defended by those who advocate fetal death as &quot;pro-choice.&quot; <br />
    America's ambivalence toward human life is a product of a line of thought that considers all truth subjective. It's a belief that pervades America's institutions &mdash; its schools, jurisprudence, politics, etc. &mdash; and it has seeped into the popular culture. It's an outlook that declares, without a hint of irony: &quot;Your reality is as valid as my reality.&quot; It was perhaps most notably expressed by Justice Kennedy in the Supreme Court's 1992 Casey v. Planned Parenthood abortion decision, which reaffirmed Roe v. Wade. &quot;At the heart of liberty,&quot; Kennedy wrote for the majority, &quot;is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of life.&quot; <br />
    This view is evident in the alarming number of women who have attempted to steal unborn babies from their expectant mothers by cutting the mothers' stomachs open and extracting the babies. In a recent case, the assailant was unable to have children of her own but was telling her family that she was pregnant. For this woman &mdash; yet another victim of the culture of death &mdash; one life was invaluable, the other of no value. <br />
    When abortion was legalized, its advocates promised a country where, to paraphrase the popular slogan, every child is a wanted child. A generation on and it's become abundantly clear: Abortion has merely helped create a world in which fewer children are wanted. <br />
     <br />
    <em>Gary Bauer is president of American Values and chairman of Campaign for Working Families.</em> <br />]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4009</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4009</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Speaker Pelosi to Monitor Your Church</strong><br />
By Jay Sekulow<br />
Friday, January 12, 2007<br />
<div>Nancy Pelosi hasn&rsquo;t been Speaker of the House for two weeks yet and there is already proposed legislation which would be the most significant encroachment ever into the affairs and ability of churches and other organizations to communicate. Under the guise of lobbying reform, Speaker Pelosi and others have proposed legislation greatly expanding the scope of lobbying regulation which would have a significant impact on churches, pastors, religious denominations, public interest organizations, civic organizations and other nonprofit groups. Even private individuals who voluntarily pay for media to distribute important messages to the general public on political matters would be impacted.
<div>So draconian is the proposed Lobbying Reform Bill that it would actually impose registration and reporting requirements on churches and other nonprofit organizations. This is because the definition of &ldquo;lobbyist&rdquo; and &ldquo;lobbying firms&rdquo; includes specifically grassroots-organizing efforts. Under this broad-based regulatory scheme that Nancy Pelosi is advocating, many churches, especially larger churches with TV and radio ministries, would be subject to registration as a lobbying organization. Failure to comply with these lobbying requirements could result in fines and even criminal sanctions. Churches and their pastors who address the social issues of the day and encourage members and non-members alike to mobilize for action, including communications with Congress, would be required to make certain initial and quarterly disclosures to the United States Congress about their activities.
<div>Under the House version of the Bill, a church or organization would be considered a &ldquo;grassroots lobbying firm&rdquo; subject to this law if the group attempted to influence the general public to voluntarily contact federal officials in order to express their own views on a federal issue. Furthermore, many large churches and ministries utilize mass media to communicate their message. Under this House Bill by Nancy Pelosi, these communications, as long as they are directed to at least one person who is not a member of the church, would fall under this new Bill. Finally, if the church spends an aggregate of only $50,000 or more for such efforts in a quarterly period, they are now required to register as lobbyists. Many ministries spend $50,000 or more a month for air time.
<div>This attempt to slip in this onerous requirement on churches and other organizations must be stopped. The rationale behind Speaker Pelosi and others&rsquo; desire to silence churches is obvious. Pastors addressing the moral issues of the day have been able to mobilize tens of thousands of individuals to speak out on various issues. But under this proposed legislation, if a church or denomination spent $50,000 of its own resources on air time to encourage people to support the confirmation of federal judicial nominees or to lend its support to a federal marriage amendment, then that church or denomination would be classified as a grassroots lobbying firm. This is one of the most significant violations of free exercise of religion and the freedom of political speech in our Nation&rsquo;s history. Some have said that this plan is the most comprehensive regulation of political speech that has ever been put forward by Congress.
<div>As one of the lawyers who argued against the campaign finance law at the Supreme Court of the United States, I can tell you that this increased government regulation of churches is not only unwarranted but also unwise. In my argument before the Court, I asserted that a prohibition on minors contributing to a political campaign was unconstitutional, and that students have fundamental rights of freedom of speech and freedom of association. A unanimous Supreme Court agreed with me. The same is true here. Lobbying reform can be put forward without impacting the ability of pastors and churches to speak out on the moral issues of the day, which is part of their prophetic responsibilities. The First Amendment of the Constitution provides for the right of the citizens to &ldquo;petition the government for a redress of grievances.&rdquo; Previous lobbying legislation recognized this right to petition the government and specifically carved out exceptions in the law. Unfortunately and not surprisingly, Speaker Pelosi&rsquo;s proposals have no such protection for the ability of our citizens to petition the government. In essence, this proposed legislation attempts to override the United States Constitution.
<div>This is not the way our Republic is structured. Congress has no authority to amend our United States Constitution on its own accord. If the Freedom of Speech and the Free Exercise of Religion Clauses mean anything, they mean that church leaders and other citizens have the right to address the moral issues of the day and encourage participation of the citizenry in support of or opposition to legislative initiatives. Nancy Pelosi&rsquo;s proposed legislation would have stopped Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. from gathering support for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In fact, as he addressed the social issues from the pulpit of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, GA, he might well have had to register as a lobbyist.
<div>What we need to do now is exercise our existing First Amendment rights of freedom of speech, freedom of association and the ability to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Our grievance is simple: Congress cannot silence churches and other organizations from grassroots involvement in critical issues of our day. Let us now petition the government aggressively and support an amendment to this proposed legislation by Senators Bennett, McConnell, Kyl, and Cornyn that would eliminate the provisions of this lobbying reform dealing with grassroots efforts. This way we can ensure that churches and many other public interest organizations would not have to register as lobbyists. <br />
<br />
<em>
<div><font size="2"><em>Jay Alan Sekulow is Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice.</em></font>
<div><font size="2">Be the first to read Jay Sekulow's column. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.townhall.com/Secure/Signup.aspx">Sign up today</a> and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.townhall.com/Secure/Signup.aspx">Sign up today!</a></font></div>
<br />
</div>
</em> <br />
<br />
Copyright &copy; 2006 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4008</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4008</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Pro-Life Groups Concerned Senate Bill Would Stop Pro-Life Lobbying</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
January 16</em><em>, 2007</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>Leading pro-life groups are concerned that a bill in the Senate would make it difficult for them and others to lobby members of Congress on pro-life issues. It would impose strict reporting requirements on any group conducting the smallest amount of lobbying and would impose strict fines and jail sentences for noncompliance.
<div>The groups, including National Right to Life, Family Research Council, American Family Association, and others, are worried about bill S. 1.</div>
<div>Under a section of the bill, anyone who is paid by any organization that encourages more than 500 people to contact Congress on any matter or anyone who has called a Congressional office more than two times urging a vote on legislation must register as a lobbyist.</div>
<div>Also, any paid individual who spends more than $25,000 in a three-month period on &quot;paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying&quot; would also be required to register and report expenditures as a &quot;grassroots lobbying firm.&quot;</div>
<div>While the bill purports to reform special interest lobbying, the pro-life groups say it would put significant and complex hurdles in front of smaller, local groups.</div>
<div>Any pro-life advocate who runs afoul of the complex requirements of Section 220 of the bill could be subjected to crushing civil penalties, raised from $50,000 to $200,000 per infraction. Punishment could also include as much as up to 10 years in prison.</div>
<div>&quot;The net effect would be to chill activities that are essential to the healthy functioning of a representative system of government,&quot; National Right to Life wrote in a letter to senators today.</div>
<div>&quot;If this provision is enacted, many ordinary citizens will get less and less information from pro-life groups and other issue-oriented organizations about what is going on in Congress,&quot; the pro-life group said of the provisions.</div>
<div>National Right to Life is urging lawmakers to adopt an amendment by pro-life Sen. Bob Bennett of Utah that would resolve the problems.</div>
<div>Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council, agrees that pro-life advocates should ask their senators to oppose the damaging provisions.</div>
<div>&quot;This is a move to stop us from informing you about the issues you find important,&quot; he said.</div>
<div>&quot;We don't oppose legitimate proposals to address unethical actions by Members of Congress, congressional staff and lobbyists,&quot; Perkins explained. &quot;But nothing in those misdeeds provides any justification whatever for the idea that Congress should regulate the constitutionally protected efforts of groups such as ours to alert citizens regarding legislative developments in Congress.&quot;</div>
<div>Perkins says his group backs the Bennett amendment as well.</div>
<div>&quot;The Senator realizes that just as it would be unconstitutional to monitor the press because of their contact with their readers, Congress has no business monitoring the motives of citizens who contact Washington to express their views,&quot; he said.</div>
<div>ACTION: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.capwiz.com/nrlc/callalert/index.tt?alertid=9247906&amp;type=CO">Click here</a> to tell your senators to support pro-life grassroots lobbying.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4007</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4007</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Pro-lifers March on Monday</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Pro-life groups are inviting grassroots activists from across the nation to join them in the 34th annual March for Life in <span id="lw_1169169565_4">Washington, D.C., on Monday, the 34th anniversary of <em>Roe v. Wade</em>.</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America (CWA), said her group&rsquo;s supporters will &ldquo;be among the thousands who hold their banners high in our nation's capital to promote respect for life.&quot;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Eric Scheidler, communications director for the Pro-Life Action League, said members of his organization would hand out cards that say, &quot;God bless you! Today you marched for life, but what about tomorrow?&quot;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The march begins at 9 a.m. EST. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The Family Research Council will host &ldquo;Blogs for Life&rdquo; -- a conference for pro-life bloggers. Speakers include Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., and Bobby Schindler, the brother of Terri Schindler Schiavo.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4005</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=4005</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Navy dismisses chaplain<br />
who prayed 'in Jesus' name'<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">'We are homeless, jobless,<br />
and we are in God's hands'</font><br />
<font size="-1"><br />
</font>
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Bob Unruh<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>A U.S. Navy chaplain who prayed &quot;in Jesus' name&quot; as his conscience dictated is being ejected from the military service &quot;in retaliation&quot; for his victorious battle to change Navy policy that required religious rites be &quot;non-sectarian.&quot;
<div>&quot;This fight cost me everything. My career is over, my family is now homeless, we've lost a million dollar pension, but Congress agreed with me and rescinded the Navy policy, so chaplains are free again to pray in Jesus' name,&quot; Chaplain Gordon Klingenschmitt told WND. &quot;My sacrifice purchased their freedom. My conscience is clear, the fight was worth it, and I'd do it all again.&quot;
<div>Klingenschmitt, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52749">as WND has reported,</a> has fought an extended battle with the Navy over its restrictions on religious expression by its chaplains. He appeared and delivered a public prayer &quot;in Jesus' name&quot; at a White House rally last winter and was court-martialed for that. The Navy convicted him of failing to follow a lawful order because his superior didn't want him praying &quot;in Jesus' name.&quot;
<div>He's also launched a legal battle that he said he hopes eventually will result in his reinstatement, alleging the Navy assembled a &quot;civic religion&quot; by ordering its chaplains to pray in a certain way.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;There's a Unitarian system of religion that's aimed at Christians,&quot; John Whitehead, founder of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.rutherford.org">The Rutherford Institute,</a> told WND. &quot;It boils down to that. We're seeing it all across the country, with council prayers, kids wanting to mention Jesus. What's going on here is it's generally a move in our government and military to set up a civic religion.&quot;
<div>&quot;I think the Supreme Court's going to have to look at the idea of can the government in any of its forms tell people how to pray, set up a basic religion and say you can only do it this way,&quot; he said.
<div>Klingenschmitt told WND he'd been delivered a formal letter of reprimand for his appearance at a White House function in March 2006 at which he wore his uniform and prayed &quot;in Jesus' name.&quot; For that he was convicted at a special court-martial of violating a lawful order from his commanding officer not to do that.
<div>His appearance was with former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice and WND columnist <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/archives.asp?AUTHOR_ID=273">Judge Roy Moore,</a> who was removed from his office when he refused to follow a federal court order he considered unlawful: to remove a Ten Commandments monument from public property.
<div>Klingenschmitt's $3,000 fine was suspended and because of the issues, Congress got involved and ordered the Navy to rescind that particular policy, and allow chaplains to pray as their &quot;conscience dictates.&quot;
<div>In a Congressional report on the situation, members of a conference committee noted, &quot;The House bill contained a provision &hellip; to prescribe that military chaplains shall have the prerogative to pray according to the dictates of their conscience, except as must be limited by military necessity, with any such limitation being imposed in the least restrictive manner feasible.&quot; That position was adopted with orders that the &quot;Secretary of the Navy rescind Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1730.7C dated February 21, 2006, titled 'Religious Ministry within the Department of the Navy'&quot; and replace it with a policy allowing such freedoms.
<div>Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld also then promised Congress that no chaplain would be punished under the now-cancelled policy, but the Navy's plans to get rid of Klingenschmitt moved forward anyway.
<div>A federal judge in Klingenschmitt's lawsuit also concluded that his termination from the service and the damage that would result would not be &quot;irreparable,&quot; so he would not step in at this point, and Klingenschmitt was delivered a Navy letter this week ordering him to move out of his home in conjunction with his removal from the service.
<div>&quot;Access onto all military installations within Navy Region Mid-Atlantic for Lieutenant Gordon J. Klingenschmitt, CHC, USNR, will terminate on January 31, 2007,&quot; said the letter from S.W. Wong, who is with the Judge Advocate General's Corp.
<div>While he's battling for reinstatement, Klingenschmitt said, he'll be accepting speaking invitations <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.persuade.tv/">and can be contacted through his website,</a> and working with supporters Alan Keyes and Rick Scarborough who have assembled an <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?https://secure.responseenterprises.com/DF_InJesusName/petition.php?a">online petition</a> that calls on new Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to honor Rumsfeld's promise that no chaplain would be punished under the old policy.
<div>&quot;U.S. Navy Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt is being unjustly punished for praying in Jesus' name, for quoting Scripture passages in a military chapel, for voicing evangelical messages about Christ while in uniform,&quot; the petition says.
<div>&quot;Chaplain Klingenschmitt courageously stood for what is right, and his stand was completely vindicated by Congress. I am calling on you to immediately exonerate him and allow him to continue his outstanding service as a Navy chaplain. Mr. Secretary, you must act! And fast! Otherwise Chaplain Klingenschmitt will be kicked out of the service by Jan. 31, ending an award-winning 15.5-year career. He will lose his pension, health care benefits and be evicted from military housing &ndash; and our sailors will lose this faithful vicar of Christ.&quot;
<div>&quot;I think the Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, should keep the promise of his predecessor,&quot; the chaplain told WND. &quot;We are homeless, jobless and we are in God's hands.&quot;
<div>&quot;My separation is in direct retaliation for my victory on Capitol Hill. This is how the Navy treats whistleblowers,&quot; he added.
<div>In the lawsuit filed by the Rutherford Institute, the authors noted that courts in the District of Columbia already have concluded: &quot;What we have here is the government's attempt to override the Constitution and the laws of the land by a directive that clearly interferes with military chaplains' free exercise and free speech rights, as well as those of their congregants.&quot;
<div>The case developed when &quot;one Navy Captain decided that he did not like the content of the Chaplain's religious speech during an optionally attended sermon in the chapel,&quot; the lawsuit said. Then a Navy investigation showed Klingenschmitt had prayed &quot;in Jesus' name&quot; and had even prayed in public in uniform. For that, the court-martial was held, &quot;ignoring Naval Uniform Regulations that permit chaplains to wear the uniform during public worship.&quot;
<div>The lawsuit notes that the Navy is using the chaplain's resignation from one &quot;ecclesiastical endorsement&quot; and acceptance of another from a different church group as its reason for terminating him. However, the lawsuit notes that the Navy's own regulations state that a chaplain &quot;shall&quot; be recertified on request.
<div>In apparent conflict, a letter from J.C. Harvey Jr., a vice-admiral, ordering Klingenschmitt's removal from the Navy, opined that &quot;presentation of a new ecclesiastical endorsement from a qualified Religious Organization does not automatically mandate recertification.&quot;
<div>The district court judge also found, in ruling against the chaplain, that in the military &quot;public worship&quot; is different from &quot;worshipping in public,&quot; so that the Navy's punishment could move forward. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3959</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3959</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Clinton, Carter to Lead Faction of Baptists Away from Biblical Truth on Life and Family</strong><br />
Carter and like-minded attempting to set up substitute religion focused on the poor, &quot;peace&quot;, the environment, and &quot;choice&quot;<br />
<br />
<div>Editorial By John-Henry Westen<br />
<br />
ATLANTA, January 11, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Former Presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter needed their Southern Baptist credentials during their political years in order to boost their electoral appeal. Now the pair, who have both been publicly criticized in the past by Southern Baptist Convention leaders, are helping to move the denomination against life and family as they did the country.<br />
<br />
At the Carter Center in Atlanta Tuesday, Clinton and Carter were on hand to announce a 2008 Baptist convocation which hopes to attract 20,000 Baptists from North America. They say it hopes to recast the Baptist image as less 'negative and judgemental'. The tentative date for the convocation is Jan. 30-Feb. 1, 2008 at the Georgia World Congress Center in Atlanta.<br />
<br />
The initiative is mostly Carter's with Clinton admitting he was there to be a &quot;cheerleader&quot;.<br />
<br />
While Clinton with his staunch abortion support, womanizing and support for homosexuality may have little concern for his being seen as a faithful Baptist, the situation is very different for Carter. While he did support abortion, and homosexuality, Carter's stands on these issues were more nuanced than those of Clinton. Moreover, Carter has distinguished himself, following his short stint as leader of the United States, through his charitable initiatives, prime among them being Habitat for Humanity.<br />
<br />
While many would see it as just another attempt to water down Christianity to the level of political correctness, Carter evidently sees his initiative as something special. &quot;This is a historic event for the Baptists in this country and perhaps for Christianity,&quot; Carter said at a press conference announcing the convocation.<br />
<br />
His efforts to shape the Baptists into a religion more of his own liberal thinking began in earnest in 2000 when he formally announced his leaving of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC). In a letter mailed to 75,000 Baptists nationwide Carter wrote, &quot;I have finally decided that, after 65 years, I can no longer be associated with the Southern Baptist Convention&quot; citing the SBC's &quot;increasingly rigid creed&quot; as his reason.<br />
<br />
Carter's views on Christian religion insist on the allowance of women pastors, on a focus on the poor, peace, the environment, and avoidance of the hurtful, divisive issues of abortion and homosexuality. <br />
<br />
Morris H. Chapman, President of the SBC Executive Committee, has noted in the past that Carter was originally embraced by Baptist conservatives in 1976 when he publicly described himself as a born-again Christian. Chapman suggests that Carter lost favour with conservative Christians after actions such as appointing Sarah Weddington - the lead attorney in the landmark 1973 abortion case, Roe v. Wade - to a White House position when he was assistant to the president.<br />
<br />
Regarding homosexuality, Carter would allow for homosexual 'marriage' but says he would not force churches to perform homosexual weddings. In an interview with the homosexual publication The Advocate in January 2006, Carter said: &quot;If an individual church or synagogue doesn't want to have marriage vows expressed by gay people, I think that ought to be a religious decision. But under no circumstances do I think a gay couple ought to be deprived of their rights as citizens.&quot;<br />
<br />
Pope Benedict XVI addressed the trend to such cafeteria-style Christianity in a speech to Swiss Bishops in November 2006, warning that it could become a &quot;substitute for religion.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;Modern society is not simply without morality, but it has, so to speak, 'discovered' and professes a part of morality&quot;, the Pope said. &quot;These are the great themes of peace, non-violence, justice for all, concern for the poor, and respect for creation.&quot; <br />
<br />
The Pope warned that these &quot;great moral themes&quot; have &quot;become an ethical complex that, precisely as a political force, has great power and constitutes for many the substitute for religion, or its successor.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;It is only if human life is respected from conception to death that the ethics of peace is also possible and credible,&quot; concluded the Pope. &quot;It is only then that non-violence can express itself in every direction; only then that we truly welcome creation, and only then that we can arrive at true justice.&quot;<br />
<br />
Carter is, with his new initiative, attempting to set up a substitute religion. A religion which regards &quot;fundamentalists&quot;, as he pejoratively refers to Christians who refuse to water down beliefs on the controversial life and family teachings of Christ, as the enemy.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3958</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3958</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>House Backs Embryonic Stem Cell Research Bill, Bush Veto Certain</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
January 11</em><em>, 2007</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>The House of Representatives approved a bill forcing taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research that involves the destruction of human life. However, the vote was well short of overcoming a veto from President Bush. <br />
<br />
House members approved the legislation, HR 3, on a 253-174 vote with Democrats supporting it 216-16 and Republicans opposing it 158-37.<br />
<br />
The vote was 32 shy of the two-thirds majority needed to overturn an expected presidential veto of the measure. The president confirmed on Thursday that he would veto it.<br />
<br />
Some 238 members of the House voted for the measure last year and this year's vote shows backers of the research, which has never helped any patients, gained 15 supporters.<br />
<br />
Advocates of the bill claimed patients would be hurt without it while pro-life lawmakers said the government should not fund the destruction of human embryos to advance science.<br />
<div>&quot;We on the pro-life side strongly support stem cell research as long as it does not require the killing of human embryos,&quot; Rep. Chris Smith, a New Jersey Republican, told his colleagues.</div>
<div>He pointed the House to new research from a team of scientists from Wake Forest University and Harvard Medical School.</div>
<div>Scientists at those institutions &quot;announced the stunning news that they had discovered a new, readily available source of potentially life saving stem cells derived exclusively from amniotic fluid,&quot; Smith said.</div>
<div>Those cells, the scientists said, have similar potential as embryonic stem cells.</div>
<div>But, Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee, a Texas Democrat, read off a list of diseases that Americans suffer and said &quot;We owe them hope and hope for the hopeless.&quot;</div>
<div>She said new embryonic stem cell research lines are needed because older ones that the federal government have funded aren't effective enough to carry out the necessary research.</div>
<div>&quot;This is the right way to go,&quot; she told the House.</div>
<div>Other lawmakers joined Smith in opposing the bill.</div>
<div>&quot;I support stem cell research with only one exception _ research that requires killing human life,&quot; Minority Leader John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, said during the debate. </div>
<div>&quot;Taxpayer-funded stem cell research must be carried out in an ethical manner in a way that respects the sanctity of human life,&quot; Boehner added. &quot;Fortunately, ethical stem cell alternatives continue to flourish in the scientific community.&quot;, </div>
<div>During the debate, backers of the bill bashed President Bush for his policy and siding with pro-life advocates.</div>
<div>&quot;The president has placated the fringe of his party and ... placed lives at risk,&quot; Democratic Rep. Frank Pallone of New Jersey said.</div>
<div>Not all Democrats supported the measure.</div>
<div>&quot;I want a cure for diabetes but I don't believe this bill is a way to get there,&quot; Rep. Dan Lipinski, an Illinois Democrat who suffers from the disease, told lawmakers. </div>
<div>&quot;I desperately want to be cured of diabetes, but science has demonstrated that we don't have to choose&quot; between science and protecting human life because of adult stem cell research.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Printed from: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/bio1950b.html">http://www.lifenews.com/bio1950b.html</a></em><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3957</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3957</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Religious Left:  More Left Than Religion<br />
<br />
A new report by the Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD) casts <br />
some <br />
very revealing light on the National Council of Churches (NCC), the <br />
vanguard of &ldquo;religious Left&rdquo; movement in America.  While Big Media <br />
ceaselessly frets about the political activity of the &ldquo;religious <br />
Right,&rdquo; it <br />
rarely takes on the &ldquo;religious Left.&rdquo;  <br />
<br />
But the report by IRD ought to raise a few eyebrows.  The NCC&rsquo;s primary <br />
spokesman has been the Reverend Bob Edgar &ndash; a former Democrat member of <br />
Congress.  It seems that as membership in liberal mainline <br />
denominations <br />
has declined over the years, Edgar has been reaching out to some of his <br />
former political allies for help in fundraising. <br />
<br />
According to IRD&rsquo;s report, the NCC now receives a majority of its <br />
funding <br />
not from churches or religious groups, but leftwing secular <br />
organizations <br />
with no interest in faith or religion at all.  For example, the NCC <br />
received grants from the Sierra Club, the Ford Foundation, Ted Turner&rsquo;s <br />
United Nation&rsquo;s Fund, and another group connected to George Soros.  The <br />
NCC <br />
also applied for a $100,000 grant from the radical Left lobbying group <br />
MoveOn.Org!  <br />
<br />
As it turns out, only six of the NCC&rsquo;s top 16 funders are church <br />
organizations.  Could it be that the National Council of Churches and <br />
the <br />
&ldquo;religious Left&rdquo; generally are more &ldquo;left&rdquo; than &ldquo;religious&rdquo;?  That <br />
would <br />
likely explain why Big Media never complains when the &ldquo;religious Left&rdquo; <br />
injects its values into the political arena. <br />
</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3956</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3956</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><font size="+1"><strong>Senate Tired of Your E-mails, Phone Calls; Expected to Pass Bill that Will Keep You From Getting Needed Information.</strong></font></div>
<div><font size="-1">Dear Mark,</font></div>
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www2.afastore.net/qry/qe_store.taf?_function=detail&amp;_peid=507&amp;_id=AB99465249&amp;_code=P"></a>
<div><font size="-1">Without a doubt, this could be the most important letter I have written you. <br />
<br />
The U.S. Senate is poised to pass Senate Bill 1 (Section 220), which would effectively keep AFA and every other pro-family organization in America from providing you information on bills in Congress. Under Senate Bill 1 (Section 220), we would only be able to provide you information on a bill at a high cost and at great danger of being penalized by Congress. <br />
<br />
To put it bluntly, members of Congress are tired of getting your e-mails and phone calls, and Senate Bill 1(Section 220) is designed to keep information from you that might inspire you to call or write your senator. <br />
<br />
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.afa.net/senatebill1.asp"><font color="#003399">Click Here</font></a> to read AFA's review of Senate Bill 1 (Section 220). <br />
<br />
The new Democratic Senate thinks that if it can keep you from getting information&mdash;which is what Senate Bill 1 (Section 220) would do&mdash;then it will not be getting e-mails and phone calls from you. <br />
<br />
Senators favoring this bill are simply tired of hearing from you. That is the bottom line. They don&rsquo;t want to hear from you. They don&rsquo;t want you to be informed. They want to silence you. How? By simply keeping you from receiving information that AFA provides. <br />
<br />
I know that language is strong, but Senate Bill 1 (Section 220) will do exactly what I&rsquo;ve said. </font></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3954</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3954</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Getting out of Debt</h3>
<h5>Debt can be an exhausting trial on a marriage. It is so much easier to spend ourselves into debt than it is getting out, but the baby steps given by financial expert Ron Blue can help.<br />
</h5>
<h5>Articles within this series</h5>
<div id="contentArea">
<div id="articleArea">
<div id="leftColumn">
<div>
<ul>
    <li><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.family.org/marriage/A000001353.cfm">Overview</a> </li>
    <li><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.family.org/marriage/A000001355.cfm">Semi-Intelligent or Semi-Stupid Debt</a> </li>
    <li><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.family.org/marriage/A000001356.cfm">Stupid and Beyond-Stupid Debt</a> </li>
    <li>Getting out of Debt </li>
    <li><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.family.org/marriage/A000001362.cfm">Next Steps / Related Information</a> </li>
</ul>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>by Ron Blue </div>
<div>We made some poor money decisions the first few years of our marriage and now we have $12,000 in consumer debt. We realize that our excessive spending was wrong and we&rsquo;re determined to change our ways. How can we reduce our debt? The following suggestions should help you pay off your debt. Choose the ones that work best for you and your spouse, then start erasing your debt today.</div>
<div><strong>Do you have any assets that can be sold?</strong> Even small things sold through a garage sale can help you pay off smaller debts. But the sale of bigger items such as cars, boats, investments and perhaps even homes should also be considered.</div>
<div><strong>Consider using savings accounts.</strong> Using a low-yielding savings account to reduce high-cost debt such as credit card debt or an installment loan is a guaranteed high-yield investment. But don&rsquo;t tap into the emergency fund that you have set aside to protect you and your family against unexpected bills.</div>
<div><strong>Try to double up on payments.</strong> By doubling up on credit payments and cutting expenses in other areas, it&rsquo;s possible to pay off debt much more quickly. There are also benefits to paying home mortgages on a bimonthly schedule, or even making just one extra payment per year. Either approach has a dramatic impact on the number of payments needed to pay off the mortgage.</div>
<div><strong>Keep constant the total amount of payments you&rsquo;re making each month.</strong> Pay off your smallest debt first. When that is gone, apply that payment to your next-smallest debt. For example, if you have several credit card and installment payments totaling $500 per month, instead of reducing the amount paid each month as the debts are eliminated, continue to spend a total of $500 a month on repayments.</div>
<div><strong>Review your living expense summary and decide where you can cut expenses.</strong> You might cut down on entertainment, clothing, food or your home-maintenance budget. In almost every family, as much as 40 percent of the budget could be used to repay debt, but it requires a change in lifestyle. Then, apply that amount to paying off specific debts.</div>
<div><strong>Review your income-tax withholdings.</strong> If you receive an income-tax refund, consider reducing your withholdings to the amount of your projected tax liability. Then apply the increase in your take-home pay to your debt repayment. Determine your tax liability for next year by looking at last year&rsquo;s income tax return to see how much you paid. Then calculate the effect of any pay raises, the birth of a child, having an older child leave home, and so on. After you have determined what you&rsquo;re likely to owe, fill out a new W-4 form. But don&rsquo;t reduce your income tax withholding below your projected tax liability. If you do, you&rsquo;re borrowing from the government to pay someone else. The day of reckoning is merely postponed to April 15.</div>
<div><strong>Don&rsquo;t decrease your charitable giving.</strong> Giving should be the first priority use of money, because it is recognition of God&rsquo;s ownership of everything. And in most cases, avoid debt-consolidation loans. Such loans don&rsquo;t solve the basic problem of overspending.</div>
<div><strong>Be careful about seeking a second full-time income.</strong> If your family can cover expenses with one income, you shouldn&rsquo;t seek a second income merely to increase revenues. When you consider the additional expenses of tithing, taxes, childcare, transportation and so on, the economic benefit of a fulltime homemaker getting a job is often almost nonexistent.</div>
<div>There are exceptions, however. A family may face unexpected medical bills or desire to send their children to a private school. In such cases, a second family income may be the means of providing the extra money Another possible exception is if a wife takes a part-time or temporary job to help pay off debt.</div>
<div>Taken from <em>The Healthy Marriage Handbook</em>, copyright &copy; 2001 Broadman &amp; Holman Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3953</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3953</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Petition Congress, Defend Your Rights</font></strong></div>
<div>by Pete Winn, associate editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Dobson asks listeners to flood Senate with calls on lobbying-crackdown bill.</em>
<div>
<div>Focus on the Family Action Chairman James C. Dobson, Ph.D., today called on Americans to contact their senators about a measure he said constitutes &quot;a grave threat&quot; to freedom of speech. </div>
<div>&quot;Democrats and a few Republicans are trying very, very quickly to insulate themselves from the public -- and to do it by muzzling people like us,&quot; Dobson said on his Focus on the Family radio broadcast.</div>
<div>S. 1, a lobbying-reform bill, is the first to come to a vote in the new Democrat-controlled Congress. One of its many provisions would require grassroots groups to report directly to the secretary of the Senate and clerk of the House any time they spend money to communicate to their constituents on public-policy issues that are before Congress. </div>
<div>Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said Section 220 would subject such groups to miles of red tape and greatly increase their costs -- difficulties that could critically hamper their ability to rally constituents to contact their elected officials. </div>
<div>&quot;This should be called the 'Silence the Citizens Act of 2007,' &quot; Perkins said. </div>
<div>The bill is so complex that, even though it appears to exempt churches from its provisions, it might not actually do so.</div>
<div>&quot;Even pastors who would encourage the members of their congregation to call their senators, their congressmen, about marriage, about life issues,&quot; Perkins said, &quot;could theoretically fall under the provisions of this measure.&quot;</div>
<div>Amanda Banks, federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said the provision would apply if a group called on people to take action or not. </div>
<div>&quot;Any time that we send out a CitizenLink e-mail, or we write an article for Citizen magazine or Dr. Dobson goes on his broadcast and talks about legislation -- like he did today -- we would have to record and report to the government four times a year,&quot; Banks said. &quot;If we did not meet those guidelines, we would be subject to fines of $100,000.&quot;</div>
<div>Dr. Dobson said the bill was prompted by senators and congressmen who didn't like the impact grassroots groups have had in leading millions of Americans to contact their elected officials.</div>
<div>&quot;Clearly, the objective here is to hide what goes on from the public -- and to punish and silence those of us who would talk about what the Congress is doing,&quot; Dr. Dobson said. </div>
<div>Carrie Gordon Earll, senior director of issue analysis for Focus on the Family Action, said not every group would come under the provision.<br />
 <br />
&quot;It does not affect labor unions, corporations, 527 groups, Hollywood-elite types or the George Soroses of the world,&quot; she said. &quot;It affects folks who, on a regular basis, communicate with the grassroots and pass along information.&quot; </div>
<div>Soros, by the way, is a leftist billionaire financier who has spent millions trying to influence elections and legislation. </div>
<div>Gary Bauer, president of American Values, said on the broadcast that 'money talks' in the nation's capital. Some kind of lobbying reform really is needed, he said, just not one that's aimed at ordinary people. </div>
<div>&quot;There's a place right outside the chambers of the Congress on Capitol Hill called 'Gucci Gulf,' &quot; Bauer said. &quot;It's called that because along that hallway there are lobbyists who make millions of dollars a year lining the walls in their Gucci shoes that cost $1,000 a pair. </div>
<div>&quot;They are able to slip into legislation -- literally in the dark of night -- all kinds of amendments that help the special interests. It might be Big Unions, or Big Business or some foreign government that&rsquo;s hired a lobbyist. That's what the American people want an end to -- that's the scandalous stuff!&quot;</div>
<div>Dr. Dobson said people need to speak out while they still can. </div>
<div>&quot;Protect your right to know,&quot; he said. &quot;Protect our right to tell you what we know.&quot;</div>
<div><strong>TAKE ACTION:<br />
</strong>We created an <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://focuspetitions.com/">urgent petition for you to sign</a> that is addressed to your senators asking them to ensure the unfair grassroots provisions are removed from S.1.</div>
<div>You may read the text of S. 1, including Section 220, on the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/">Library of Congress Web site</a>. Under &quot;Search Bill text&quot; enter &quot;S. 1&quot; and click &quot;Search.&quot;</div>
<div>You may also click here to listen to today's <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://listen.family.org/daily/A000000188.cfm">Focus on the Family broadcast online</a>.</div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3952</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3952</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Christians hail ethical source for stem cells<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Scientists say amniotic fluid better than human embryos</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2007 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>Christian leaders from around the world are hailing the announcement of a source for stem cells &ndash; and their related medical research lines &ndash; without obtaining them from aborted babies or from lab-created-and-destroyed human embryos.
<div>The announcement in Nature Biotechnology said seven years of research by scientists from Wake Forest School of Medicine and Harvard University concluded that stem cell lines derived from amniotic fluid actually have a greater potential for good than stem cells from human embryos.
<div>The endorsements from Christian leaders whose constituencies could be numbered in the hundreds of millions have been coming in ever since, and include a range from those heading a pro-life action group in Wichita, Kan., to the Vatican.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;This story has become Page 1 news today because, to this point, the media has not told the truth about how promising non-embryonic stem cell research is,&quot; said James Dobson, founder of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/?redir/r.asp?http://www.focusaction.org">Colorado Springs-based Focus on the Family Action.</a> &quot;Instead, they've chosen to put their emphasis on promoting research that kills human beings in their tiniest form.
<div>&quot;Hopefully, the facts that were brought to the fore today will influence members of the House of Representatives to reject the expansion of federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research when the legislation comes up for a vote this week,&quot; he continued. &quot;There is now a tremendous opportunity for those of us who hold to pro-life views to call for uncompromising support of research using sources that do not imperil preborn life.&quot;
<div>One of the senior researchers on the project, Anthony Atala, said his hope is that the cells will provide a resource for tissue repair and for &quot;engineered organs.&quot;
<div>&quot;It has been known for decades that both the placenta and amniotic fluid contain multiple progenitor cell types from the developing embryo, including fat, bone, and muscle. We asked the question, 'Is there a possibility that within this cell population we can capture true stem cells?' The answer is yes.&quot;
<div>The issue of the medical research and potential breakthroughs that might one day come from stem cell research always has been used by abortion industry supporters as a reason for those activities, even though the current medical treatments all come from adult stem cell research, not embryonic stem cells. Stem cell research proponents also routinely argue that life begins at birth.
<div>Christians, on the other side, have argued that life from the moment of conception is sacred and must be protected, even to the point of protecting human embryos from destruction through research techniques.
<div>&quot;This study provides more evidence that there is no need to destroy human embryos in order to treat disease or otherwise benefit mankind,&quot; Dobson said. &quot;In fact, there are no clinical trials anywhere in the world where embryonic stem cells are being used in patients.&quot;
<div>To the contrary, at least 70 conditions already are being treated with stem cells from bone marrow and cord blood, and similar prospects are likely for stem cells from amniotic fluid, he said.
<div>The announcement means that Congress has no need to move forward when it votes tomorrow on expanding federal funding for stem cell research that kills human life.
<div>&quot;We urge all members of Congress to uphold respect for life while maximizing the investment of American tax dollars by investing in proven and promising stem cell research that does not violate the conscience of many Americans,&quot; said Dr. David Stevens, head of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.cmda.org">Christian Medical Association.</a>
<div>The bill pending in the House is similar to one vetoed earlier by President Bush, who has authorized and approves of federal funding for a limited number of stem cell research lines.
<div>&quot;We have learned that the ethical route to stem cells is also the most medically effective and promising route to stem cells. Americans' resources should be used for ethical, effective and promising stem cell research that does not violate ethical standards by killing human embryos,&quot; Stevens said.
<div>The research announcing the availability of stem cells from amniotic fluid noted that such stem cells can be grown in large quantities, do not require cells from live human embryos, do not develop tumors as the embryonic stem cells do, and estimated that a research line of 100,000 cells would satisfy 99 percent of all research needs.
<div>&quot;This new science has been able to isolate every type of stem cell needed for therapy and healing medicine without the moral concern for loss of innocent life that has alarmed Christians,&quot; said Troy Newman, the chief of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.operationrescue.org">Operation Rescue.</a>
<div>Rev. Patrick Mahoney, of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://nationalclergycouncil.org">Christian Defense Coalition,</a> noted that science now can move forward &ndash; towards a better goal and without the moral and ethical objections that are associated with &quot;live human embryonic experimentation.&quot;
<div>&quot;This latest research on amniotic cells is further evidence that we don't need to kill one life in order to save another,&quot; said Wendy Wright, the president of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.cwfa.org">Concerned Women for America.</a>
<div>&quot;Scientific research proves that the moral choice is also the healthiest and most effective way to find cures,&quot; she said.
<div>Judie Brown, of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.all.org">American Life League</a> said the pending plan to enhance federal dollars for current embryonic stem cell research activities is horrible.
<div>&quot;The continual misinformation about human embryonic stem cell research offered by those who wish to encourage such 'science' does not change the fact that terminating the lives of innocent human embryos for research is ethically and morally corrupt,&quot; she said.
<div>Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan, who heads the Vatican's Pontifical Council for Health Pastoral Care, called it a significant advance that allows for medical progress &ndash; without costing innocent lives.
<div>&quot;I am very glad to see this progress in the field of science for the good of humankind,&quot; he told Vatican Radio.
<div>The Vatican, he said, &quot;is not obscurantist and is always ready to welcome real scientific progress that neither threatens nor manipulates the sources of life.&quot;
<div>Support for the pending embryonic stem cell research funding measure, however, remained staunch among the Congressional elite. &quot;We should pass the bill again and again and again until we get a president who will sign it,&quot; said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.
<div>One outspoken abortion supporter, Diana DeGette, D-Colo., said it's about time her side gets its way. &quot;We have the momentum, we have the votes, we have the support of the public.&quot;
<div>The National Institutes of Health says adult stem cells, which already have been used in medical therapies, are limited because they can only differentiate into cell types of their tissue of origin, while embryonic stem cells, which haven't yet been used in any successful therapy, can become all types of cells of the body.
<div>However, it already was known that stem cells from an adult can be returned to that person without complications, while embryonic stem cells can be rejected by a patient's own immune system, and they often develop into tumors.
<div>The results of the research, if they prove to be as valuable as they are promising, also would eliminate such atrocities as that that <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53407">WND reported just days ago.</a>
<div>Several reports in British papers told the story of a video showing a post-mortem examination of infants of Ukrainian mothers who believe their babies were stolen from them at birth.
<div>The video was given to reporters by a charity worker representing 300 families who believe their healthy babies were falsely declared dead by staff at a maternity hospital in the Ukraine's most easterly city of Kharkiv.
<div>A senior British forensic pathologist who has viewed the video says that what he's seen does not look like standard post-mortem practice, the BBC reported. The video shows severed limbs and torsos with organs, including brains, stripped away.
<div>The thorough dismemberment of the bodies has led some to believe that, if the grisly evidence points to the babies having been murdered, the hospital may be supplying harvested stem cells from bone marrow to an underground market.
<div>Officially, the cells are taken from aborted fetuses with the mothers' consent, but, given the hundreds of Ukrainian women who have complained of newborns stolen and the recently surfaced post-mortem video, the government authorized an investigation into whether a trade in babies-killed-to-order exists.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3837</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3837</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">New Findings Support Pro-Lifer Calls for Non-Embryonic Stem-Cell Research<br />
</font></strong><font size="+0"><font size="1">
<div>By Jim Brown and Jenni Parker<br />
January 10, 2007</div>
<font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - An opponent of embryonic stem-cell research says a new report from U.S. scientists revealing the presence of pluripotent stem cells in amniotic fluid offers confirmation of what pro-life groups have been saying for years -- that is, that advancing medical knowledge does not require the destruction of human embryos.</div>
<div>Researchers with Wake Forest University Medical School and Harvard Medical School have reported that they were able to extract stem cells from amniotic fluid donated by pregnant women and then turn the cells into several different tissue cell types including brain, liver, and bone tissue cells (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/1/92007a.asp">see related story</a>).</div>
<div>Pro-life, pro-family, and medical ethics groups are jointly hailing the new stem-cell study, the findings of which suggest these non-embryonic stem cells derived from amniotic fluid show great potential for usefulness in treating disease. Pro-life advocate Mark Crutcher, founder and president of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifedynamics.com/">Life Dynamics Incorporated</a>, says he and other pro-lifers have been trying for years to get the message across that it is not necessary to kill a living human being in order to achieve benefits in medical science. &quot;This just proves that we're right,&quot; he contends.</div>
<div>Crutcher says he finds it interesting that in the past the medical science community has not been able to demonstrate even &quot;one single scientific breakthrough using embryonic stem cells.&quot; All the breakthroughs that have taken place in therapeutic use of stem cells to treat disease have come through use of adult stem cells, he points out -- not through embryonic stem-cell research, or ESCR.</div>
<div>&quot;And yet,&quot; the Life Dynamics spokesman observes, &quot;the medical community and the media have been pushing embryonic stem cells as the be-all and end-all.&quot; That is something he doubts will change, even in the wake of this latest research out of Harvard and Wake Forest University Medical School. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/1/92007b.asp">See earlier story</a>)</div>
<div>Crutcher says the new research findings will not likely deter efforts by House Democrats to pass legislation expanding federal funding of embryonic stem-cell research. These pro-ESCR lawmakers continue to tout embryonic stem-cell research, he says, even though these ethically problematic studies have yielded no cures for disease and have shown no likelihood of doing so in the near future.</div>
<div>But despite these facts, House Democrats &quot;continue to push embryonic stem cells; and so there has to be some other agenda at play here,&quot; Crutcher asserts. &quot;And when you look at -- in this case -- the Democratic Party, which is completely owned -- lock, stock, and barrel -- by the abortion lobby in this country,&quot; the pro-life advocate says, &quot;you have to start looking at what the hidden agenda may be&quot; -- particularly, he adds, when the liberal lawmakers &quot;continue to push things that have shown absolutely no promise for success.&quot;</div>
<strong>
<div>Dobson: Media Finally Getting the Message About Non-Embryonic Stem CellsMeanwhile, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.focusaction.org/">Focus on the Family Action</a> chairman Dr. James Dobson believes the new stem-cell study has become front page news precisely because the mainstream media has not previously told the truth about how promising non-embryonic stem-cell research is. &quot;Instead, they've chosen to put their emphasis on promoting research that kills human beings in their tiniest form,&quot; he says.</div>
<div>&quot;Hopefully,&quot; Dobson comments, &quot;the facts that were brought to the fore [in the Harvard-Wake Forest researchers' report] will influence the members of the House of Representatives to reject the expansion of federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research when the legislation comes up for a vote this week.&quot; Because of the new research, the pro-family leader asserts, a tremendous opportunity now exists for &quot;those of us who hold pro-life views to call for uncompromising support of research using sources that do not imperil preborn life.&quot;</div>
<div>After all, the Focus on the Family Action spokesman emphasizes, &quot;there are no clinical trials anywhere in the world where embryonic stem cells are being used in patients.&quot; On the contrary, he notes, research using cells from non-embryonic sources such as bone marrow and umbilical cord blood have been used to treat at least 70 conditions. And now, Dobson adds, &quot;similar therapies may be developed using cells from amniotic fluid.&quot;</div>
<div>The <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cmdahome.org/">Christian Medical Association</a>, America's largest faith-based association of doctors, is also hoping the stem-cell research findings reported this week will influence U.S. lawmakers, especially since Congress is currently considering legislation that parallels a bill previously vetoed by President Bush -- a bill that would provide federal sanction for destroying human embryos.</div>
<strong>
<div>Congress Asked to Respect Sanctity of Life, Fund Ethical ResearchDr. David Stevens, CEO of the Christian Medical Association, says his group is encouraging all members of Congress &quot;to uphold respect for life while maximizing the investment of American tax dollars by investing in proven and promising stem-cell research that does not violate the conscience of many Americans.&quot; The medical science community has learned that the ethical route to stem cells is also the most effective and most promising route, he notes.</div>
<div>&quot;We have long known that unlike human embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells have been proven effective in treating ... dozens of diseases,&quot; Stevens explains. But on the other hand, he says, &quot;We have long known that human embryonic stem cells are notoriously unstable and tend to form tumors.&quot;</div>
<div>And now the Harvard-Wake Forest research has discovered that stem cells derived from a baby's placenta and amniotic fluid appear to hold the same tissue-building potential once thought exclusive to human embryonic stem cells, the CMDA physician notes. He believes lawmakers owe it to U.S. taxpayers to take this new information into consideration.</div>
<div>&quot;Americans' resources should be used for ethical, effective and promising stem-cell research that does not violate ethical standards by killing human embryos,&quot; Stevens emphasizes. He says the Christian Medical Association has publicly urged U.S. members of Congress to devote healthcare dollars to funding ethical, non-embryonic stem-cell research.</div>
</strong></strong></font></font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3836</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3836</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3><span id="intelliTXT">Stem Cells Found in Amniotic Fluid </span></h3>
<div><strong>Stem cell researchers reacted with enthusiasm and reservations to a report that scientists have found stem cells in <strong>amniotic fluid</strong>, a discovery that would allow them to sidestep the controversy over destroying embryos for research.</strong></div>
<div nd="1">Researchers at <strong>Wake Forest University</strong> and <strong>Harvard University</strong> reported Sunday that the stem cells they drew from amniotic fluid donated by pregnant women hold much the same promise as embryonic stem cells.</div>
<div nd="2">They reported they were able to extract the stem cells from the fluid, which cushions babies in the womb, without harm to mother or fetus and turn their discovery into several different tissue cell types, including brain, liver and bone.</div>
<div>But Dr. Anthony Atala, head of Wake Forest's regenerative medicine institute and the senior researcher on the project, said the scientists still don't know exactly how many different cell types can be made from the stem cells found in amniotic fluid. The scientists said preliminary tests in patients are years away.</div>
<div>
<div nd="4">The cells from amniotic fluid &quot;can clearly generate a broad range of important cell types, but they may not do as many tricks as embryonic stem cells,&quot; said Dr. Robert Lanza, chief scientist at the stem cell company <strong>Advanced Cell Technology</strong>. &quot;Either way, I think this work represents a giant step forward for stem cell research.&quot;</div>
<div nd="5">Dr. George Daley, a Harvard University stem cell researcher, said the finding raises the possibility that someday expectant parents can freeze amnio stem cells for future tissue replacement in a sick child without fear of immune rejection.</div>
<div nd="6">Nonetheless, Daley said, the discovery shouldn't be used as a replacement for human embryonic stem cell research.</div>
<div nd="7">&quot;While they are fascinating subjects of study in their own right, they are not a substitute for human embryonic stem cells, which allow scientists to address a host of other interesting questions in early human development,&quot; said Daley, who began work last year to clone human embryos to produce stem cells.</div>
<div nd="8">Atala said the research reported in the scientific journal Nature Biotechnology expands far beyond similar work.</div>
<div nd="9">At a heart research conference in November, Swiss researcher Simon Hoerstrup said he managed to turn amniotic fluid stem cells into heart cells that could be grown into replacement valves. Hoerstrup has yet to publish his work in a scientific journal.</div>
<div nd="10">&quot;Our hope is that these cells will provide a valuable resource for tissue repair and for engineered organs as well,&quot; Atala said.</div>
<div nd="11">It took Atala's team some seven years of research to determine the cells they found were truly stem cells that &quot;can be used to produce a broad range of cells that may be valuable for therapy.&quot;</div>
<div nd="12">Atala said the new research has found even more promising stem cells with the potential to turn into many more medically useful replacement parts.</div>
<div nd="13">&quot;We have other cell lines cooking,&quot; Atala said.</div>
<div nd="14">The hallmark of human embryonic stem cells, which are created in the first days after conception, is the ability to turn into any of the more than 220 cell types that make up the human body. Researchers are hopeful they can train these primordial cells to repair damaged organs in need of healthy cells.</div>
<div nd="15">However, many people, including President Bush, oppose the destruction of embryos for any reason. The Bush administration has restricted federal funding for the embryo work since 2001, leading many scientists to search for alternative stem cell sources.</div>
<div nd="16">The advance is the latest in the so-called regenerative medicine field that has sprung from Atala's lab in Winston-Salem, N.C.</div>
<div nd="17">In April, Atala and his colleagues rebuilt bladders for seven young patients using live tissue grown in the lab.</div>
<div nd="18">In the latest work, Atala's team extracted a small number of stem cells swimming among the many other cell types in the amniotic fluid.</div>
<div nd="19">One of the more promising aspects of the research is that some of the DNA of the amnio stem cells contained Y chromosomes, which means the cells came from the babies rather than the pregnant moms.</div>
<div nd="19">from foxnews.com</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3748</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3748</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>        </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
<table cellspacing="14" cellpadding="0" width="100%" border="0">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td align="left"><span id="ctl00_PageBodyContentPlaceHolder_NewsTitle"><strong>Update on Military Chaplains &amp; Prayer</strong></span></td>
            <td valign="top" align="right" rowspan="3"><a onmouseover="window.status=''; return true;" onclick="PrintThisPage();" href="http://www.aclj.org/News/Readwr.aspx?ID=2498#"></a> <a onmouseover="window.status=''; return true;" onclick="SendBodyToFriend();" href="http://www.aclj.org/News/Readwr.aspx?ID=2498#"></a></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td><span>
            <div><font size="2">With 2006 drawing to a close, there is some good news to report from Washington, D.C. regarding an issue we have been working on for quite some time at the ACLJ - the issue of protecting the free speech of military chaplains to pray according to their own faith.  It's an important victory - but there are still new challenges ahead in this area in 2007.</font></div>
            <div><font size="2">On November 21st, the Air Force, following a move made by the Navy a few weeks prior, rescinded it's current guidelines that constrained its chaplains in the manner in which they prayed and interacted with members of the military. </font></div>
            <div><font size="2">While this is a victory, there is still much to do.  ACLJ's Director of Government Affairs Drew Ryun reports that with the Republican losses on November 7th, Democrat Senator Carl Levin from Michigan, the Senator pushing the &quot;tolerance&quot; language earlier this fall, takes the gavel as chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Over on the House side, Democrat Congressman Steve Israel from New York, while not taking the chairmanship of the House Armed Services Committee, will have more power than ever to push for the tolerance language that infringes on chaplains' right to pray.<br />
             <br />
            As in the past, Congressman Walter Jones from North Carolina is continuing to fight for chaplains and their right to pray in the name of Jesus. Given the new change in Congressional power, Congressman Jones is urging the President Bush to act on the behalf of the chaplains by ordering the new Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, to issue a Department of Defense wide order to allow chaplains to pray according to the dicates of their own faith.</font></div>
            <div><font size="2">from aclj.org</font></div>
            </span></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3744</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3744</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">Canada's 'Three-Parent' Ruling Opens Can of Worms, Says Activist<br />
</font></strong><font size="1">
<div>By Chad Groening and Fred Jackson<br />
January 5, 2007</div>
</font><font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - A Canadian pro-family activist says a recent ruling by the highest court in Ontario could prove to be more harmful to Canadian society than even legalized same-sex &quot;marriage.&quot;</div>
<div>Pro-family groups in Canada are vowing to fight the appeals court ruling which says three-parent families must be legalized. The highest court in the province of Ontario issued a unanimous ruling earlier this week that gives legal parental status to the lesbian partner of a biological mother, essentially giving a five-year-old boy three parents. The court also declared that the Children's Law Reform Act does not reflect current society and does not provide for the best interests of the child who is raised by the lesbian women and visited by his father twice a week.</div>
<div>Brian Rushfeldt, executive director of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.familyaction.org/">Canada Family Action Coalition</a>, says he is absolutely appalled by the ruling, which he fears could eventually spread to all of Canada. He contends the judges now think they can redefine biology.</div>
<div>&quot;I think [the] ruling ... is actually going to be more destructive to our social fabric than allowing homosexuals to be married,&quot; Rushfeldt laments, &quot;because what we've just done is ... legalize using children as pawns for adults' own agendas.&quot;</div>
<div>The family advocate explains that the ruling came about simply because of the desires of three adults. </div>
<div>&quot;The whole thing was driven by two lesbians and a professor who inseminated one of them artificially, I guess,&quot; he says. &quot;And this whole ruling was based on one particular case -- these three people deciding that somehow they wanted to all be considered the parents.&quot;</div>
<div>He also contends that another driving factor was the agenda of the two lesbians. &quot;[They] don't like the law the way it is, and they wanted it altered -- and consequently they found a judge finally who would do it,&quot; he says.</div>
<div>Rushfeldt says the ruling will undoubtedly open a &quot;can of worms&quot; as three or more people may be claiming to be the parents of a child for economic or other selfish reasons. His concern echoes earlier comments by Joseph Ben-Ami, executive director of the Institute for Canadian Values, who referred to the ruling as &quot;naked judicial activism&quot; and said the courts have no business making decisions as to what constitutes societal norms.</div>
<div>Like Rushfeldt, Ben-Ami also fears the decision will have even more far-reaching consequences, including demands from step-parents and grandparents for full parental rights over children.</div>
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3743</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3743</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">ADF Sues NY School District Over Censorship of Pro-Life Viewpoint<br />
</font></strong><font size="1">
<div>By Jim Brown<br />
January 5, 2007<br />
</div>
</font><font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - One of the largest school districts in upstate New York has joined a growing list of public schools now facing a federal lawsuit over their treatment of pro-life students. A middle school student has sued the Shenendehowa Central School District after allegedly being told to turn his pro-life T-shirt inside out and to stop distributing to his classmates flyers that discussed the dangers of abortion.</div>
<div>Shenendehowa Central is the third U.S. public school district in the last two weeks to be sued by the pro-family legal organization <a target="_blank" href="http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/">Alliance Defense Fund</a> (ADF) for censoring pro-life students. ADF attorneys filed a complaint against the district and the principal of the Gowana Middle School on behalf of a student who says he was barred from expressing pro-life views during the national Pro-Life Day of Silent Solidarity, an event organized by the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.standtrue.com/">Stand True</a> ministry.</div>
<div>The plaintiff's attorney, Matt Bowman, says students at Gowana Middle School who received the pro-life student's flyers were ordered to return them immediately to administrators to be discarded. But Bowman is highlighting what he sees as a double standard on the school officials' part.</div>
<div>&quot;This school allows literature and T-shirts criticizing the Iraq war and criticizing President Bush,&quot; the ADF lawyer points out. Also, he notes, &quot;They have a sex-ed program; and yet this principal shut down every method of pro-life speech because he says students shouldn't be thinking about that.&quot;</div>
<div>However, the law is on the student's side -- not the administration's, Bowman insists. He says U.S. courts have clearly stated that if other students are allowed to wear T-shirts and pass out literature on controversial issues outside of class, then Christian and pro-life students should have the same right.</div>
<div>Shenendehowa District officials would be wise to settle the case, the pro-family attorney contends. &quot;We're always willing to work with a school to prevent blatant constitutional violations like this,&quot; he says; &quot;And hopefully this school and other schools will decide before litigation happens -- or before litigation has to proceed -- that they're not going to pick and choose which students get to exercise their constitutional rights.&quot;</div>
<div>ADF-affiliated attorney Tom Marcelle of Albany, New York, is serving as co-counsel in the Shenendehowa case. He comments, &quot;If 13-year-olds are old enough to participate in sexual education courses, they are certainly old enough to talk about issues such as abortion.&quot;</div>
<div>In any case, students have rights under the First Amendment, Marcelle emphasizes. School officials, he asserts, do not have the right to select which constitutionally protected speech is permissible and which is not.</div>
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3742</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3742</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Joseph in the Stable: The Importance of Fathers</strong></div>
<div><strong></strong>Earlier this week, churches around the world marked the birth of Jesus Christ.  In celebrating this joyous event, many congregations read the account of Christ's nativity from the Gospel of Matthew.  Though most Christmas cards and paintings appropriately emphasize the relationship between mother and child, Matthew's gospel highlights the role of another main character: Christ's earthly father, Joseph.  According to Scripture, Joseph was a righteous man who planned to quietly divorce Mary (to save her from public humiliation) when she was found pregnant before their marriage was consummated.  Before Joseph could leave, however, an angel of the Lord appeared to him explaining that the child was conceived by the Holy Spirit. Following the angel's instructions, Joseph took Mary home and raised Jesus as his son.</div>
<div>God, the Heavenly Father, ensured that His Son had a human father.  This, of course, was not technically necessary.  God could have easily sent Gabriel to Mary before she was engaged to Joseph.  Because no human father was involved in the conception of Christ, the character of Joseph may seem superfluous.  Yet in God's wisdom, Joseph was there with Mary in the manger.  Jesus was obedient to Joseph as a child (Luke 2:51), and, no doubt, learned to be a carpenter by following Joseph's example.  Even though Joseph was not Jesus' biological father, God apparently regarded the role of an earthly father sufficiently important that he made provision for His Son to have one.  Today, our post-modern culture minimizes the role that fathers play, and, in many instances, has reduced fatherhood to the role of a mere &quot;inseminator&quot;.</div>
<div>Recently the <em>Washington Post</em> ran an article entitled &quot;<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/15/AR2006121501820.html"><font color="#003399">My Father Was an Anonymous Sperm Donor</font></a>&quot;, written by an eighteen year-old girl named Katrina Clark whose mother was artificially inseminated.  Miss Clark described how she was angry for many years about the fact that she did not know even minor details about her father.  &quot;I was angry at the idea that where donor conception is concerned, everyone focuses on the 'parents'&mdash;the adults who can make choices about their own lives,&quot; Miss Clark wrote. &quot;The recipient gets sympathy for wanting to have a child. The donor gets a guarantee of anonymity and absolution from any responsibility for the offspring of his 'donation.' As long as these adults are happy, then donor conception is a success, right?&quot;</div>
<div>Clark answers this question with a simple &quot;no.&quot;  She says that when she was young she would &quot;daydream about a tall, lean man picking me up and swinging me around in the front yard, a manly man melting at a touch from his little girl. I wouldn't have minded if he weren't around all the time, as long as I could have the sweet moments of reuniting with his strong arms and hearty laugh. My daydreams always ended abruptly; I knew I would never have a dad.&quot;  Miss Clark even describes being jealous of other school children who were raised in broken families because at least they had fathers that they occasionally saw.</div>
<div>Katrina Clark's <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/15/AR2006121501820.html"><font color="#003399">entire article</font></a> is well worth careful reading.  Her overall point is clear: it is not irrelevant whether or not a child has a father.  When a child does not have a father, that child lacks something important.  True, sometimes a tragedy occurs that renders a child fatherless.  Some fathers die young, others desert their families.  Historically in these circumstances the community would step in to help the mother, and provide the child with healthy father figures whenever possible.  It was never considered noble to intentionally have a child out of wedlock, regardless of the woman's desire for motherhood.  The needs of the child were put first.</div>
<div>Today, many people have false illusions about fatherhood, imagining that it is entirely optional.  Some people have had negative experiences with their own fathers, and they therefore assume that their children will do better without a potentially negative male influence.  Social scientists do not share these false illusions about fatherhood.  In <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fatherhood.org/father_factor.asp"><font color="#003399">category after category</font></a>&mdash;poverty, health, education, crime, drug use, teen pregnancy&mdash;children with fathers are healthier than children who are raised by single parents.</div>
<div>Though the benefit of having a married father and mother are now well known, the incidence of fatherlessness continues to rise.  This fact was highlighted in another recent <em>Washington Post</em> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/16/AR2006121600998.html"><font color="#003399">article which found</font></a> that sixty-nine percent of black children are born to single mothers.  Many young black men have no role models when it comes to fatherhood because they do not know their own fathers.  In some families, many generations of children grow up without any positive male figures in their lives.</div>
<div>This fact is not only a tragedy, it is an injustice.  As a society, we should strive to ensure that every child has a mom and a dad.  When this does not happen, we should see it as a regrettable failure, not a clever new type of family structure.  It is a tragedy when it happens in the inner city because of family breakdown, and it is also a tragedy when it happens in upper class communities where aging women decide to go forward with motherhood even when they have not yet found a husband.  It is not that such women do not have what it takes to be a mother&mdash;they do.  The problem is that they do not have what it takes to be a father.  When we, for selfish reasons, try to redefine the norm of two parent families, it is the child who suffers.</div>
<div>God, in his wisdom, did not deprive his Son of a human father.  As wonderful as Mary was, God apparently felt that there were some things she could not give her son&mdash;things that were important to Jesus' upbringing.  Therefore, on Christmas day, the holy family huddled close together in the manger: mother, father and child.  It was a good model then, and it's a good one now.  We abandon it at our peril&mdash;especially at the peril of our children. </div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3634</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3634</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">Christian Culture Analyst Recaps 2006 Church Trends, Future Directions<br />
</font></strong><font size="+0"><font size="1">
<div><strong><font size="4"></font></strong> By Fred Jackson<br />
December 29, 2006</div>
<font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - Christian researcher George Barna has outlined what he considers his most significant findings for 2006. Among these is his assessment that, although large majorities of the public claim to be &quot;deeply spiritual&quot; and say that their religious faith is &quot;very important&quot; in their life, only 15 percent of those who regularly attend a Christian church ranked their relationship with God as their top priority.</div>
<div>Barna, who has been conducting national public opinion surveys and cultural analysis for 25 years, notes that even clergy have to compete for people's attention and acceptance in contemporary American society. &quot;One of the reasons that the Christian faith is struggling to retain a toehold in people's lives,&quot; he contends, &quot;is because even the highest-profile leaders of the faith community have limited resonance with the population.&quot;</div>
<div>According to the researcher, the latest survey statistics suggest Christians may be more attuned to matters of culture and entertainment than to matters of faith. &quot;People pay attention to what they deem important,&quot; he says. &quot;These figures may be another indicator that millions of Christians invest more of their mental energy in cultural literacy than in biblical literacy.&quot;</div>
<div>Barna's recent studies also found that the notion of personal holiness has slipped out of the consciousness of the vast majority of Christians. According to his research group's findings, while just 21 percent of adults consider themselves to be holy, by these respondents' own admission, large numbers have no idea what &quot;holiness&quot; means and only one out of every three believe that God expects people to become holy.</div>
<div>In contrast, however, to this apparent spiritual decline, the researcher also found that there is a group he calls &quot;Christian Revolutionaries&quot; who are growing in number. He says they are the type who show a great interest in things such as personal Bible study and spiritual mentoring. Also, he notes, individual Christians' involvement in house churches is rapidly growing.</div>
<div>In his year-end review, Barna describes what he sees as three general spiritual patterns that are likely to gain prominence in the coming years. The first of these, he says, is diversity: along with new forms of spiritual leadership and expressions of faith, he predicts that ecumenism will expand as the emerging generations pay less attention to doctrine and more attention to relationships and experiences.</div>
<div>The second prediction from the head of Barna Research has to do with what he calls &quot;bifurcation.&quot; He expects to see a widening gap between the intensely committed and those who are casually involved in faith matters. The difference, Barna says, will become strikingly evident between those who make faith the core of their life and those who simply attach a religious component onto an already mature lifestyle.</div>
<div>Barna's third prediction deals with the use of media. He says new technologies will significantly reshape how people experience and express their faith, as well as the ways in which they form communities of faith.</div>
<strong>
<div align="center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&amp;BarnaUpdateID=252">Read Barna's complete report on his 'Significant Religious Findings' of 2006</a></div>
</strong></font></font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3633</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3633</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font color="#440000" size="2">FAITH UNDER FIRE<br />
</font></strong><font color="#000000" size="+2">Christians flee Iraq, find Syria 'ruthless'</font><br />
<font color="#000000" size="+1">Ministries say believers have no Mideast refuge</font><br />
<font size="-1"><br />
</font>
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Bob Unruh<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>Christians may be fleeing war-torn Iraq and the fighting Islamic factions there to Syria, but that nation also holds &quot;ruthless&quot; positions against Christianity which range from life in prison for talking about your beliefs to death for a Muslim who converts, according to a ministries working there.
<div>&quot;It's better than Iraq, but it's no bed of roses there for sure,&quot; Jim Jacobson, president of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.christianfreedom.org/Countries/Syria.html">Christian Freedom International,</a> told WND. &quot;The Christians (there) are stuck between a rock and a hard place.&quot;
<div>
<div>While Dubai, Saudi Arabia, Iran and other Middle East nations are well-known for persecuting Christians, Syria's actions are of a lower profile. But it is listed among those nations around the world that persecute Christians by everyone from Jacobson's organization to the U.S. government.
<div>In Syria, the constitution requires the president to be a Muslim and specifies that Islamic jurisprudence is a principal source of legislation. And sharing your Christian faith with someone &ndash; anyone &ndash; is discouraged as &quot;posing a threat to the relations among religious groups&quot; and carries a penalty of up to life in prison, he said.
<div>&quot;For Christians, one of the core tenets is the ability to share your faith, but in Syria that can lead to arrest (and) persecution,&quot; Jacobson said. &quot;We list Syria as one of the top &hellip; countries where Christians are facing real persecution.&quot;
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;Syria isn't Saudi Arabia, but it's one of the big untold stories out there,&quot; he said. For those who want to convert from Islam to Christianity, &quot;you're disowned by your family, if the local mosque issues a death threat, no one is going to do anything about it, you'll just end up dead. Nothing is done, no police action, that's just understood.
<div>&quot;If you convert you'd better leave the country,&quot; he said.
<div>For those who already are Christian, the government allows them to practice their religion &ndash; but within harsh and restrictive guidelines. A Christian is not allowed to proselytize &ndash; ever. And churches who want to hold an extra service must get a government permit. Sermons are routinely monitored, as is church fundraising.
<div>He said the issue for Iraqi Christians is the choice of being dead soon in Iraq, or taking your chance in Syria and so they are flooding into Syria. An Iraqi population of Christians estimated at 1.2 million before the war now is holding at about 500,000, he said, with a good many traveling to Syria.
<div>The status of Christianity in Syria reached the headlines recently as Pastor Rick Warren, author of &quot;The Purpose-Driven Life,&quot; visited there and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53171">described it for the Syrian media and on a video as a &quot;moderate&quot; nation.</a>
<div>He said he saw Christians and Jews in a near-routine existence, enjoying some privileges even Muslims don't receive within a governmental structure that formally allows for faith in Christ and adherence to the Torah.
<div>According to SANA, the Syrian government news service, Warren said &quot;many Americans don't realize that both Christianity and Judaism are legal in Syria. In addition, the government provides free electricity and water to all churches; allows pastors to purchase a car tax-free (a tax break not given to Muslim imams); appoints pastors as Christian judges to handle Christian cases; and allows Christians to create their own civil law instead of having to follow Muslim law.&quot;
<div>Others, however, noted that his praise for <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53502">Syria wasn't proper.</a>
<div>&quot;It's a tragic, tragic, tragic situation. We're very concerned about the future of Christians in the region. When people are choosing to go to Syria, which certainly is no friend of Christians at all, it's a pretty bad situation,&quot; said Jacobson
<div>He said one project his organization has been developing is to encourage the United States and other nations to be willing to accept as refugees many of those fleeing Iraq, Syria and other Mideast nations.
<div>&quot;If you're going to a place like Syria, it's really because you've got no place to go,&quot; he said.
<div>He said the government in Syria uses a lot of &quot;window dressing&quot; such as formal recognitions of Easter and Christmas and the like, to give the impression of an open and tolerant atmosphere.
<div>However, that's common from a lot of the &quot;brutal regimes&quot; whose agendas include the destruction of Christians. For example, North Korea offers tours of &quot;Christian&quot; churches operating within its borders.
<div>&quot;The treatment on the ground is far different,&quot; Jacobson said. &quot;If you're a Christian, you don't talk about it. If you try to share your faith, distribute Christian literature, distribute a Bible &ndash; something any religion should be allowed to do &ndash; you're going to get arrested and asked to leave the country. You can't do that there.&quot;
<div>A number of reports put the population of Syria at about 18 million, with the Christian population at about 10 percent of that. A report in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1863335,00.html">The Guardian</a> estimated 350,000 Christians have fled Iraq for Syria, and they now are living with extended families in one-room apartments on leftover savings or charity.
<div>&quot;Few would deny that Syria has much to reform,&quot; that report said. &quot;It is a one-party &hellip; state, where political activists are suppressed and an extensive network of secret police fills the prisons with political prisoners.&quot;
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://etools.780net.com/a/jgroup/bg_wwwpersecutioncom_wnd-vompp_9.html">Voice of the Martyrs,</a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.opendoorsusa.org/Display.asp?Page=WWL2006">Open Doors USA</a> and other Christian ministries work with persecuted Christians, but they primarily provide aid. Christian Freedom International combines aid with advocacy, publicizing bad situations, documenting cases and presenting the information to policymakers considering trade, aid, visa and other issues.
<div>It works with local churches &ndash; including underground house church networks and Christian cell groups in nations where public Christian worship isn't allowed &ndash; as well as mission groups and Christian church denominations.
<div>&quot;These courageous Christians share our passion of assisting the part of the Body that is suffering. They work with us to provide medicine, safe-houses, aid, Bibles, education, documentation, and advocacy to Christians and their families who are on the front lines of persecution,&quot; the organization said. &quot;Because they risk arrest, imprisonment, torture, and martyrdom for their work with us, we are careful to protect their identity and details of our work in their country.&quot;
<div>The needs range from basic shelter and food and water to medicines, Bibles and other resources. &quot;In Burma hundreds of &hellip; Christians facing genocidal persecution are in need of emergency medical care each month and yet we have had to cut back on some of our operations there because of lack of funds. CFI turns down two out of three requests for emergency help due to lack of funds.&quot;
<div>The group <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.persecution.org/suffering/country_info.php">International Christian Concern</a> said Syria has some of the same characteristics &ndash; regarding its treatment of Christians &ndash; as North Korea, Vietnam, Egypt and China.
<div>And a special report from The Voice of the Martyrs listed Syria among three dozen or more nations where Christians face &quot;arrest, imprisonment, physical torture and death.&quot;
<div>&quot;In this secular state, Muslims are still given preferential treatment in many areas of society. The Emergency Law of 1963 allows authorities to conduct 'preventative' arrests and hold detainees without any legal safeguards. Christians find it difficult to spread the gospel freely under such conditions. Missionaries are not allows visas, so Christians are able to exhibit their faith only in professional and informal friendship settings,&quot; the report said.
<div>A <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71432.htm">U.S. government report</a> from this fall said activities of religious groups are monitored, and all religious groups must register with the government, which also monitors fundraising.
<div>&quot;During the reporting period the government sometimes encouraged negative &ndash; even violent &ndash; expressions of Islamic religious sentiment, at least in part of curry favor with the Syrian Sunni majority. The clearest example of this occurred on Feb. 4, 2006, when the government allowed Muslim groups to demonstrate publicly against the publication of cartoons, and later failed to control a mob of several thousand Muslim protesters that attacked and set fire to the building housing the Danish, Swedish, and Chilean embassies, and later set fire to the Norwegian Embassy.&quot;
<div>The state-owned newspapers promote Islam and Syrian state radio also broadcasts dawn, noon and afternoon Muslim prayers, according to the U.S. report, and the president has decreed the establishment of a Sharia law faculty at Aleppo University. All citizens are subject to Islamic religious law regarding child custody, inheritance and adoption.
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.worldmag.com/articles/12405">WORLD Magazine</a> cited the case of Samer, a Jordanian Christian, who was jailed in Syria for 50 days with no notification of the nature of his &quot;crimes.&quot; He later was released from the Syrian court system and moved to the United States.
<div>&quot;I want [people] to understand that there is a false image of Islam as a religion of peace and compassion. Many countries of the Middle East have a good image here in the U.S., but their rules are not what Americans think &hellip; When [Islamic countries] talk about human rights and freedom, it's not true &ndash; unless you remain in Islam,&quot; he said.
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://csi-int.org/countdown_for_christians.php?sId=01149622190">Christian Solidarity International-USA</a> also noted that &quot;the historical process of Islamization has transformed Syria's once thriving Christian majority into a small frightened community. Its existence is under threat. Syrian's Baath Party dictatorship is not as violent in its persecution of Christians as some other regimes and extremist Islamist movements in the region. Yet, the odds are stacked against the country's intimidated Christians.&quot;
<div>CSI spokesman Father Keith Roderick said Syria is a totalitarian state, and the Christian freedoms, or lack thereof, reflect that. &quot;There are restrictions. It's not a free society, therefore religious express is not as free at it should be,&quot; he said.
<div>He said one particular concern was Christian schools, which are required by law to have a Muslim principal. &quot;It's a police state. Of course there are problems,&quot; he told WND.
<div>He said the fact that Syria has become what appears to be a &quot;home base&quot; for a number of terrorist organizations also is a &quot;destabilizing factor.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3632</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3632</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Liberty and Justice for the Small</h3>
<div>Gregory Sisk's research finds that courts treat fringe religious groups better than Catholics and Baptists.</div>
<div><strong>Interview by Nate Anderson</strong> | posted 12/20/2006 08:11AM</div>
<br />
<div id="body">
<div>Legal theorists have long believed that Christians stand a better chance at winning religious liberty cases in federal courts than do members of minority faiths. But new research by Gregory Sisk, a law professor at the University of St. Thomas, finds that exactly the opposite is true. Sisk talked with ct about his research and what it means for Christians in America.</div>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="215" align="right" border="0">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td><a id="relatedLink" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/article_print.html?id=39763#related">Related articles and links</a><br />
            <br />
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<div><strong>Why did scholars believe mainstream Christians fared better than minorities in religious liberty cases?</strong><br />
Some suggested that this was because most judges on state and federal benches are Christians. Judges were thought to sympathize with those who expressed views consistent with their own.</div>
<div>'When traditional Christians raise claims that resonate with the culture wars in our society, judges find it more difficult simply to see it as a religious exemption case.'<br />
Gregory Sisk</div>
<div><strong>But you didn't find that to be true?</strong><br />
Our research suggests that the opposite, in fact, takes place. Those who belong to minority faiths succeed at the same rate as religious liberty claimants in general. In contrast, those who hold a more traditional Christian faith, such as Roman Catholics and evangelical Baptists, are finding that their claims are significantly less likely to succeed in front of a federal court.</div>
<div><strong>Why Catholics and Baptists especially?</strong><br />
There are a few possible explanations. One would be that the historical bigotry against Catholics and to some lesser extent evangelical Christians has persisted into the modern day and can be found even on the judiciary. But I'm inclined to reject that conclusion. In actually reading these opinions, there is simply nothing that suggests any kind of crude prejudice against Catholics or Baptists.</div>
<div>Looking into the data a little bit further, we found that the claims that traditional Christians tend to bring are a shot across the bow of the modern liberal secular ship of state. They tend to resist increased government supervision of church activities such as religious schools or they resist the application of anti-discrimination laws to religious institutions.</div>
<div>In the past, the greatest threats to religious liberty were posed by patriotic sentiments and a law-and-order agenda typically advanced by the Right. Today, the greater threat may come from the Left through imposition of anti-discrimination and social welfare requirements even against religious believers and communities.</div>
<div><strong>So why don't Christians do as well in court?</strong><br />
Part of what might be occurring here is that judges, like anyone else, are troubled more by difficult problems close to home rather than those that seem far off. So when a judge examines a claim by a minority religious group, that they ought to be exempted from the rule requiring a photograph on their driver's license or that they need access to a sweat lodge for cleansing, the judge is unlikely to think about whether he or she actually disagrees with that position. They just regard it as something that's different and unusual and non-threatening. </div>
<div>But when traditional Christians raise claims that resonate with the culture wars in our society, judges find it more difficult simply to see it as a religious exemption case. They may instead consider whether they actually agree or disagree with the claim that's being made. Judges try, I think, quite sincerely to set aside their personal views, but judges are human beings.</div>
<div><strong>Does the religion of the judge matter?</strong><br />
It does. We found, for example, that Jewish judges were far more likely to be favorably disposed towards claims of religious conscience. Our study also suggested that Catholic judges were more likely to respond favorably to religious liberty claims.</div>
<div>But we're not suggesting that you can use this to predict the behavior of individual judges. You can't say, &quot;Well, this judge is Jewish and that judge is Catholic, and therefore I know how he or she is going to rule.&quot; That's simply not the case at all. You're talking about dozens and dozens of judges and making a general comment about their tendencies.</div>
<div><strong>How successful are religious liberty claims in general?</strong><br />
In the lower federal courts, our study and others suggest that the overall success rate is one in three. Now what's the right number? Who could say? Obviously not every religious liberty claim should succeed. </div>
<div>A lot of cases fall out early on. As a religious liberty dispute arises, the parties often talk to one another and work it out, and it never finds its way into a courtroom. In other cases, a lawsuit is filed and a settlement quickly reached, and that also generally doesn't get much attention. So the kinds of cases that find their way all the way to a published opinion are more likely to be the difficult kinds of cases.</div>
<div>No one would want all of these suits to succeed, because some of them challenge important applications of the law that a civilized society simply can't do without. The classic example is the person who insists that his or her religion requires human sacrifice. Understandably, no court will ever accommodate that.</div>
<div><strong>How did you arrive at these results?</strong><br />
We looked at all published decisions in both the United States Court of Appeals and the United States District Court from 1986 to 1995. We included every single case that involved religious liberty claims during that 10-year period. Then we applied the tools of social science and statistics to figure out a way to translate these things into numbers. And that, of course, required some methodological choices that individuals might disagree with, but which we thought either made sense or the literature supported.</div>
<div><strong>What sorts of objections have people made to the study?</strong><br />
The most common objection is that the study compares apples and oranges&mdash;that every religious liberty case is so different from every other one that you can't simply put them all together into a generalized study.</div>
<div>But our assumption is that as long as you have a large sample&mdash;hundreds of cases, not just a few&mdash;the oddities between them will be washed out in the overall mix. In addition, our study used only published federal court opinions. Published opinions are those that judges believe are sufficiently important that they ought to be recorded. That makes it far less likely that the kinds of cases included are silly or frivolous. And we specifically controlled for types of claims and different fact categories of cases.</div>
<div><strong>Did reading hundreds of these cases give you more or less respect for federal courts?</strong><br />
Definitely more respect. In reading these opinions, you see that claims being made by individuals at the lowest levels of society are taken seriously. We looked at claims made by prisoners who sought accommodation by prison administrators for their religious beliefs, whether it was dietary requirements or access to religious counseling. And while one might think that claims being made by prisoners would be among those least likely to succeed, we did not find that to be the case. This means that the claims of the most marginalized individuals are being taken seriously by judges who take the time to actually write opinions about the outcomes. I think that speaks pretty well of the courts.</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3631</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3631</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Ministry Leader Sees Public Schools Stepping Up Censorship of Pro-Life Viewpoint<br />
</strong></div>
<div>By Jim Brown<br />
December 26, 2006</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - The head of a Christ-centered pro-life ministry that works with youth says public schools are becoming bolder in their efforts to censor pro-life students.</div>
<div>Virginia high school senior Andrew Raker has sued the Frederick County School system in Winchester for barring him from wearing a pro-life T-shirt and passing out pro-life materials on campus. The youth was taking part in a national pro-life event called the &quot;Day of Silent Solidarity,&quot; which is sponsored by Stand-True Ministries.</div>
<div>Brian Kemper, president of Stand True, says a growing number of schools are taking aggressive action against students who want to share their pro-life views. &quot;Every year that we do events like the pro-life Day of Silent Solidarity,&quot; he notes, &quot;more and more schools try to censor the kids and tell them they can't do it.&quot;</div>
<div>And unfortunately, Kemper adds, &quot;there's so many times where parents just tell their kids, 'Well, go ahead and don't do it, then; don't make any waves,' or 'Don't try to fight the system.'&quot; However, the ministry spokesman disagrees. &quot;When the system is wrong,&quot; he asserts, &quot;we need to stand up for our rights.&quot;</div>
<div>The more schools take away the rights of pro-life students, the harder it becomes to fight for those rights, Kemper observes. But schools are bound, he says, by the Constitution of the United States to allow students to express their opposition to abortion, so long as they do so in a non-disruptive manner.</div>
<div>Still, the Stand True spokesman says, that is not the reality on many campuses. &quot;It's kind of a sad case,&quot; he contends, &quot;when you've got kids who can wear Marilyn Manson shirts that have all kinds of disgusting messages on them, but when they wear a positive, life message, the school will discriminate against them.&quot;</div>
<div>Kemper says what America has is &quot;a backwards situation in our public schools right now.&quot; He encourages pro-lifers to speak out and to fight against government or other secularist attempts to censor their message, which is protected by the First Amendment.</div>
<div>The Alliance Defense Fund, a pro-family legal defense organization, filed suit on behalf of Andrew Raker. The ADF attorneys representing the high school senior say they plan to file a series of complaints against public schools that blocked students from expressing their pro-life views on the Day of Silent Solidarity.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3630</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3630</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><em>Year In Review</em>: PTC's Study Finds Children's TV Content Disturbingly 'Mature'<br />
Entertainment, 2006</strong>
<div>December 27, 2006<br />
Originally published on March 6, 2006<br />
</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - The Parents Television Council (PTC) has released a report on its first study of children's television, which -- according to the media watchdog group's research -- features even more violence than adult-oriented television. But the head of that pro-family group says that is not all that should concern parents about what their kids may be viewing.</div>
<div>The 28-page report is titled &quot;Wolves in Sheep's Clothing: A Content Analysis of Children's Television&quot; [PDF]. In it, the researchers detail their findings, distinguishing between &quot;cartoony&quot; violence versus more realistic depictions of violent acts, and making note of other kinds of offensive and mature content to be found in child-targeted programming.</div>
<div>PTC president Brent Bozell feels parents need to pay attention to the report's revelations. &quot;This new study has found that the violence aimed toward little children is almost double compared to the levels of violent content directed toward families and adults during prime-time hours,&quot; he says.</div>
<div>&quot;One might quickly dismiss violence in children's programming as inconsequential,&quot; Bozell continues, &quot;but what has changed is that the violence is ubiquitous, often sinister, and in many cases frighteningly realistic.&quot; Also, he notes, one of the more disturbing trends the study uncovered was &quot;the amount of adult-oriented subtext that was laced throughout both the animated and live-action programs.&quot;</div>
<div>For the study, the organization's researchers focused on after-school and Saturday morning entertainment programming for school-aged children in the 5-10 age range on broadcast television and expanded basic cable. Eight networks offered programming that matched the criteria: these included ABC, Fox, NBC, WB, ABC Family, Cartoon Network, Disney Channel, and Nickelodeon.</div>
<div>The analysis covered a three-week period during summer 2005 and examined 443.5 hours of children's TV, excluding kid's educational programming. During that period, researchers found 3,488 incidents of violence were depicted, for an average of 7.86 instances per hour. And even when instances of &quot;cartoony&quot; violence were discounted, the numbers remained as high as 2,794 instances of violence, for an average of 6.30 instances per hour.</div>
<div>The study also found 858 incidents of &quot;verbal aggression&quot; (averaging 1.93 per hour); 662 incidents of &quot;disruptive, disrespectful or otherwise problematic attitudes and behaviors&quot; (averaging 1.49 per hour); 275 incidents of sexual content (averaging 0.62 per hour); and 250 incidents of offensive language (averaging 0.56 per hour).</div>
<div>While the Cartoon Network had the highest total number of violent incidents altogether, the ABC Family Channel averaged the most violent incidents per episode (an average of 10.96 instances per episode). The WB topped a number of lists with the highest levels of offensive language, sexual content, verbal abuse, and offensive/excretory references.</div>
<strong>
<div>The Impact of Violent and 'Mature' Content on Young Viewers<br />
</div>
<div>The kind of problematic content found in the PTC study does have an effect, Rich contends. Particularly in young children, he notes, that effect can manifest itself in terms of sleep disturbance, anxiety, nightmares, and even post traumatic stress disorder. CMCH's own studies show that, based on MRI and heart-rate data, violent video clips shown to children were emotionally and physically arousing and fear inducing, affecting parts of the brain linked to attention, arousal, threat detection, episodic memory and 'fight or flight' responses.</div>
<div>Other studies have shown that the impact of other kinds of mature content on young people can be equally profound. Research by the RAND Corporation has indicated that adolescents who watch large amounts of television containing sexual content are twice as likely to begin engaging in sexual intercourse in the following year as their peers who watch little such TV programming.</div>
<div>Rebecca Collins, a RAND psychologist who led a 2004 study on this topic, noted that 12-year-olds who watched copious amounts of television with sexual content &quot;behaved like the 14- or 15-years-olds who watched the least amount of sexual television.&quot; She says her research team saw a striking advancement in sexual behavior among kids whose TV viewing included a lot of sexual content.</div>
<strong>
<div>Urging Children's TV Industry to Grow Up<br />
</div>
<div>The PTC spokesman can only hypothesize why so many producers of children's programming fail to see this and generate shows with so much violent or otherwise offensive, adult-oriented content. Sadly, he suggests, these producers must think that they can, by entertaining parents with all this use of &quot;double entendres and innuendo,&quot; somehow get the adults to encourage their children to watch their programs. However, he feels this kind of reasoning has only resulted in increasingly degraded and unsuitable content on kids' TV.</div>
<div>&quot;The downward spiral of children's television must stop,&quot; Bozell insists. &quot;Broadcast and cable networks must be held accountable for allowing such inappropriate content to corrupt our children.&quot; Meanwhile, he adds, parents and other pro-family advocates &quot;must also hold advertisers responsible for underwriting these messages.&quot;</div>
<div>A <em>Washington Times </em>article on the PTC analysis notes that Kansas Republican Senator Sam Brownback said he finds the results of the children's television study &quot;very troubling.&quot; According to that news report, he suggests it may be time for federal agencies to investigate whether broadcast companies are again targeting children with adult materials.</div>
<div>Also, Brownback encouraged Congress to pass legislation that would increase fines for television indecency violations. A bill passed by the House increased fines for broadcast indecency to $500,000, while a Senate bill would raise them to $325,000.</div>
</strong>In light of this kind of information, Bozell says the children's television industry needs to grow up and start behaving more responsibly. In a recent <em>Family News in Focus </em>article, he is quoted as demanding, &quot;Why in the world should parents have to guard their children from programming that's designed for five-year olds?&quot; The producers of TV content for kids &quot;ought to recognize that there is that sweet, wonderful innocence of childhood that must be defended and protected at all times,&quot; he says.</strong>According to Michael Rich of the Center on Media and Child Health, children's shows featuring violence, bullying, disrespect, and offensive language do have an impact, even when these elements are couched in comedy and cartoon fantasy. He says research has shown that &quot;children younger than 8 are developmentally incapable of distinguishing between fantasy and reality.&quot;]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3629</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3629</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">Author/Evangelist Offers Help in Responding to Atheists, Evolutionists<br />
</font></strong><font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><font size="1">
<div>By Allie Martin<br />
December 27, 2006</div>
<font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - A well-known evangelist and Christian television show host is trying to equip believers to respond effectively to atheists.</div>
<div>In his book <em>Intelligent Design vs. Evolution: Letters to an Atheist</em>, Ray Comfort uses actual e-mails between himself and an atheist that took place several years ago. When the atheist inquired why Comfort did not accept &quot;scientific facts&quot; supporting the theory of evolution, the evangelist responded that there was more proof that the world is flat. That interchange eventually led to Comfort's writing of the book.</div>
<div>Comfort contends that many Christians do not know how to respond to atheists' questions about intelligent design, or ID. The evangelist maintains that God's Word can be defended scientifically, historically, and logically.</div>
<div>&quot;When it comes down to it, there are no scientific arguments for evolution,&quot; he points out. &quot;Evolutionists use a specific language -- it's called the language of speculation ....&quot;</div>
<div>And when using that language, Comfort contends that evolutionists use phrases such as &quot;Well, we believe,&quot; and terms such as &quot;perhaps,&quot; &quot;maybe,&quot; &quot;could have,&quot; and &quot;possibly.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;They continually use [that phraseology] because there's no basis for what they're saying,&quot; says the host of the program <em>The Way of the Master</em>. &quot;It's all conjecture.&quot;</div>
<div>But when it comes to creation, Comfort explains, there is what he describes as &quot;absolute, hard, scientific, empirical evidence.&quot; In fact, Comfort claims to be able to prove God's existence scientifically in two minutes -- without the use of &quot;faith.&quot;</div>
<div>Christians' response to naysayers, he suggests, is first to explain that the word &quot;science&quot; simply means &quot;knowledge.&quot; Then, he says, engage them with the following: &quot;Let me give you knowledge of a Creator. To have a building, you must have a builder. To have a painting, you must have a painter. Buildings don't happen without a builder; paintings don't happen without a painter. Creation cannot happen without a Creator.&quot; </div>
<div>Comfort's co-host on <em>The Way of the Master</em> is Christian actor and speaker Kirk Cameron. His book <em>Intelligent Design vs. Evolution</em> -- as well as a board game based on the book -- is available through the Internet at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wayofthemaster.com/">WayoftheMaster.com</a>. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis recommends the board game for families, saying it will help them to become better equipped to &quot;defend our precious Christian faith.&quot;</div>
</font></font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3628</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3628</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="+1">The New Tolerance</font><br />
<font color="#000000">L. John Van til, Ph.D.</font><br />
December 22, 2006<br />
<br />
<div>Americans joyfully celebrate the holiday season in a variety of ways while tolerating one another&rsquo;s religious and non-religious traditions. During the rest of the year, many Americans practice a new kind of tolerance that differs from the country&rsquo;s historical roots. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>History books recount the story of Roger Williams, the founder of Rhode Island . Williams wanted religious freedom. He is known and admired by many because he practiced tolerance and encouraged freedom in his colony. Williams is frequently quoted as saying, &ldquo;Forced worship stinks in the nostrils of God.&rdquo;  Thus, dissenters from prevailing religious views in the colony were tolerated, therein enjoying freedom of conscience to hold whatever views seemed right to them. But Williams&rsquo; tolerance didn&rsquo;t earn him the same: He was condemned for his views and banished from the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Yet, a century later, the founding fathers enshrined Williams&rsquo; views of freedom and tolerance in the first clauses of the Bill of Rights. </div>
<div>            </div>
<div>As a result, freedom of religion, speech, the press and much more have been the bedrock of American society for more than two centuries&mdash;albeit not always without flaws in practice. The principle of tolerance&mdash;defined as the sense of having a fair and objective attitude towards others&rsquo; opinions, religious views or other practices&mdash;was rooted in these freedoms. However, the way the culture defines tolerance has changed dramatically in recent years. </div>
<div>            </div>
<div>Evidence of a new view of tolerance first appeared on my cultural radar a few years ago while I was visiting an old friend. In the midst of one of our frequent, spirited discussions about current political events, she insisted that I should be more tolerant of her views. I assured her that I always tried to exercise tolerance of others&rsquo; views and that such an attitude was essential to my scholarly life. &ldquo;No! No! You are not tolerant!&rdquo; she said forcefully. After a time of parsing and defining terms, it was clear that her use of tolerance did not mean the same thing as the time-honored, traditional meaning of the term. She was using an old word in a new way, practicing a kind of linguistic neo-orthodoxy.</div>
<div>            </div>
<div>And what exactly did she mean? Being tolerant, she insisted, meant that I had to agree with and accept her view as not only valid but equal to my view, even though it was contrary to mine. While the traditional definition of tolerance allowed individuals to hold whatever views they desired, this new definition tends to suppress freedom of expression altogether.  This newly defined idea of tolerance is recognized by many as the backbone of the &ldquo;politically correct&rdquo; movement. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>In order to differentiate between these differing views of tolerance, it is time to give this linguistic innovation a name of its own. Perhaps, it should be called the &ldquo;new tolerance.&rdquo; </div>
<div>            </div>
<div>Is this discussion a mere semantic &ldquo;tempest in a tea pot?&rdquo; Not at all. It is, indeed, a very practical issue. Listen to discussions on education, politics, morality or foreign policy and what do you hear? Demands that you practice tolerance of all views. That is to say, you are morally wrong if you do not agree with that view. <br />
          </div>
<div>Clearly, the &ldquo;new tolerance&rdquo; is gaining ground as an axiom in public policy, especially in education. Is that not what is occurring in the classroom when little children are forced to accept, by teachers and texts, homosexuality as a normal (read valid) life-style? And this even though the opposite view is being taught in most homes. In the future, the &ldquo;new tolerance&rdquo; may require that we ask what radical Islamists want. Are they not the ultimate or extreme practitioners of the &ldquo;new tolerance?&rdquo; </div>
<div>            </div>
<div>What is the effect of the &ldquo;new tolerance&rdquo; on the freedoms the founders fought for? How far is it from the &ldquo;forced worship&rdquo; that Roger Williams said &ldquo;stinks in the nostrils of God?&rdquo; Not very far, it seems to me. Stated another way, does not the &ldquo;new tolerance&rdquo; erode the basic freedoms the Bill of Rights was designed to guarantee? I think so, but then we are free to disagree&mdash;and that&rsquo;s a freedom we should be thankful for this holiday season.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3589</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3589</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Don't stop terror rockets, says Israeli prime minister<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">New rules of engagement restrict army from taking defensive actions</font><br />
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Aaron Klein<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>JERUSALEM &ndash; Prime Minister Ehud Olmert yesterday rejected a plan by military leaders here to allow the Israeli Defense Forces to take out Palestinian militants it catches in the process of launching rockets from the Gaza Strip into nearby Jewish cities, WND has learned.
<div>IDF leaders charged Olmert was &quot;damaging&quot; Israeli security.
<div>Following a cease-fire imposed in Gaza Nov. 26, Olmert has restrained the IDF from taking any defensive measures to stop the regular firing of Palestinian Qassam rockets into Israeli communities.
<div>Since the truce went into effect, nearly 50 rockets were fired from Gaza.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>Yesterday, the IDF spotted militants in the northern Gaza Strip setting up rocket launchers, military sources told WND. Two rockets then were fired into Israel. One landed near Sderot, a large city about 3 miles from Gaza; the second landed in an open field near Gaza.
<div>As <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53451">WND reported</a>, the IDF several times last week spotted militants in the process of launching rockets but the military was unable to take any action. Olmert's government changed the rules of engagement following the cease-fire. Now, if Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are caught launching rockets at Jewish cities, the Israeli military is forbidden to respond.
<div>Previously, the IDF used artillery units and aerial strikes against militants discovered in the process of launching rockets.
<div>&quot;We are frustrated just watching the rocket launchers being set up. There is nothing we are allowed to do,&quot; said a military source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to media.
<div>&quot;So far we've been lucky, but soon one of the rockets will kill someone and then questions should be asked about why we weren't allowed to do anything,&quot; the source said.
<div>Military leaders told WND defense officials, backed by Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz, yesterday petitioned Olmert at a security cabinet meeting to ease some of the limitations on the army and to allow the military to take out Palestinian rocket crews in Gaza it catches setting up for attacks.
<div>The military leaders said Olmert rejected the plan, stating he had confidence Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas would act against the Gaza rocket crews.
<div>Olmert said his policy of restraint in the face of Palestinian cease fire violations would continue to &quot;give peace a chance,&quot; according to the military leaders, who were present at the meeting.
<div>Olmert said he discussed the issue of Palestinian rockets at a meeting Saturday with Abbas.
<div>Olmert and Abbas met in Jerusalem to discuss Israeli-Palestinian cooperation and Palestinian infighting that has been waging since Abbas last weekend called for new elections in a move widely seen as an attempt to dismantle the Hamas-led government.
<div>Olmert reportedly agreed to a series of concessions to help bolster Abbas, including the transfer of $100 million in frozen taxes collected on behalf of the Palestinian government and the removal of some security checkpoints in the northern West Bank. The checkpoints are regularly credited by the IDF with helping to stop Palestinian terrorists attempting to infiltrate Jewish cities.
<div>Israeli political sources told WND Olmert also agreed to freeze Jewish construction in the West Bank and to bulldoze Jewish communities in the territory reportedly built without government authorization.
<div>Olmert said he plans to hold several future meetings with Abbas in light of what he said was progress made Saturday.
<div>Vice Premier Shimon Peres told Israeli radio yesterday Olmert's meeting with Abbas could provide an opportunity to carry out the prime minister's plan to withdraw from most of the West Bank.
<div>&quot;An opportunity has been created [for West Bank withdrawal], certainly. I don't want to say that it's a done deal. But this is an important opening, one that should not be dismissed,&quot; Peres said.
<div>The West Bank runs alongside Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Israel's international airport.
<div><strong>Olmert didn't consult army before implementing cease-fire</strong>
<div>Meanwhile, defense officials here are charging the cease-fire in Gaza is damaging Israel's security.
<div>The truce called for a halt of smuggling activity by Palestinian groups in Gaza. It also called for a cessation of rocket attacks launched by Palestinian militants in Gaza aiming at nearby Jewish communities in exchange for Israel withdrawing its ground troops from the Strip and halting military activity in the territory.
<div>Earlier this month, IDF chief of staff Dan Halutz told Israel's Knesset that Olmert did not fully consult with the Israeli army before agreeing to the cease-fire with Palestinian militants.
<div>IDF sources and several prominent Knesset members said the cease-fire is allowing Palestinian groups to continue smuggling weapons into Gaza. They said the truce would provide downtime for militants to train for attacks against Israel.
<div>The IDF has been petitioning for a large-scale assault in Gaza.
<div>The officials said that according to IDF assessments, the best options to stop the daily rocket fire from Gaza into nearby Jewish communities and to halt the regular smuggling of weapons from neighboring Egypt include drafted plans to retake parts of Gaza.
<div>They said other options presented to the Israeli government for a large-scale Gaza assault focusing on dismantling the terror infrastructure inside the Gaza Strip have also been rejected by Olmert.
<div><strong>Terrorists: Cease-fire means chance to reload</strong>
<div>In a series of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53106">WND exclusive interviews</a> conducted immediately after last month's cease-fire was finalized, leaders of the four largest Palestinian terror groups in Gaza said the new truce will be used to smuggle weapons into Gaza; reinforce and train &quot;fighter units&quot;; and produce rockets for a future confrontation with the Jewish state.
<div>&quot;The cease-fire offers a period of calm for our fighters to recover and prepare for our final goal of evacuating Palestine,&quot; said Abu Abir, spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees, a Hamas-allied terror organization in the Gaza Strip responsible for many of the recent rocket attacks against Israeli communities.
<div>&quot;We will keep fighting [Israel], but for the moment we will postpone certain parts of the military struggle,&quot; said Abu Abir. &quot;We will reinforce very quickly and rush what we are doing to prepare [for attacks against Israel] in Gaza and in the West Bank.&quot;
<div>Abu Abdullah, a senior leader of Hamas' so-called &quot;military wing,&quot; told WND Hamas agreed to the cease-fire &quot;because we need a period of calm to recuperate. This lull in fighting will not bring us to speak about peace.&quot;
<div>Abu Abdullah is considered one of the most important operational members of Hamas' Izzedine al-Qassam Martyrs Brigades, Hamas' declared military wing.
<div>He pointed to Hamas' doctrine, which calls for the destruction of Israel and which refuses to recognize the Jewish state.
<div>&quot;The political leadership (of Hamas) will never compromise on these values,&quot; the terror leader said.
<div>Abu Abdullah said Hamas has its own political reasons to respect the truce.
<div>&quot;We wish to show Islam as a ruling party is capable of leading the Palestinian people,&quot; he said. &quot;Since Hamas was elected, we have been through only chaotic periods. We want a period of calm to prove we are not only a revolutionary movement but to show the Palestinian people our rule is without the corruption of (the rival) Fatah (party).&quot;
<div>But Abu Abdullah said the cease-fire would ultimately end in violence.
<div>&quot;All the Palestinian people and all the Muslims will launch a direct confrontation with Israel. This may come soon or it may take some time,&quot; Abu Abdullah said.
<div>Abu Luay, a leader of Islamic Jihad in Gaza, told WND Israel's call for a cease-fire &quot;proves our rocket attacks work. The Zionists know there is now remedy for our rockets.&quot;
<div>The Islamic Jihad leader said Palestinian rocket attacks against Israel would resume &quot;at a time of our choosing.&quot;
<div>Abu Ahmed, the leader of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades in the northern Gaza Strip, told WND his terror group would respect the cease-fire.
<div>The Brigades, responsible for scores of suicide bombings, shootings and rocket attacks, is the declared military wing of Abbas' Fatah party.
<div>&quot;We will respect the cease-fire as the president (Abbas) has ordered us to do,&quot; said Abu Ahmed. &quot;We keep our right to respond to any Israeli aggression. Our group does not give up any of its ideals, which is a withdrawal of the Israelis.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3588</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3588</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="5">Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears<br />
</font></strong>Size and Scope of the Interagency Investigative Tool Worry Civil Libertarians<br />
<div><font size="-1">By Dan Eggen<br />
Washington Post Staff Writer<br />
Tuesday, December 26, 2006; A07<br />
</font>
<div>
<div>The Justice Department is building a massive database that allows state and local police officers around the country to search millions of case files from the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration and other federal law enforcement agencies, according to Justice officials.</div>
<div>The system, known as &quot;OneDOJ,&quot; already holds approximately 1 million case records and is projected to triple in size over the next three years, Justice officials said. The files include investigative reports, criminal-history information, details of offenses, and the names, addresses and other information of criminal suspects or targets, officials said.</div>
<div>The database is billed by its supporters as a much-needed step toward better information-sharing with local law enforcement agencies, which have long complained about a lack of cooperation from the federal government.</div>
<div>But civil-liberties and privacy advocates say the scale and contents of such a database raise immediate privacy and civil rights concerns, in part because tens of thousands of local police officers could gain access to personal details about people who have not been arrested or charged with crimes.</div>
<div>The little-noticed program has been coming together over the past year and a half. It already is in use in pilot projects with local police in Seattle, San Diego and a handful of other areas, officials said. About 150 separate police agencies have access, officials said.</div>
<div>But in a memorandum sent last week to the FBI, U.S. attorneys and other senior Justice officials, Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty announced that the program will be expanded immediately to 15 additional regions and that federal authorities will &quot;accelerate . . . efforts to share information from both open and closed cases.&quot;</div>
<div>Eventually, the department hopes, the database will be a central mechanism for sharing federal law enforcement information with local and state investigators, who now run checks individually, and often manually, with Justice's five main law enforcement agencies: the FBI, the DEA, the U.S. Marshals Service, the Bureau of Prisons and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.</div>
<div>Within three years, officials said, about 750 law enforcement agencies nationwide will have access.</div>
<div>In an interview last week, McNulty said the goal is to broaden the pool of data available to local and state investigators beyond systems such as the National Crime Information Center, the FBI-run repository of basic criminal records used by police and sheriff's deputies around the country.</div>
<div>By tapping into the details available in incident reports, interrogation summaries and other documents, investigators will dramatically improve their chances of closing cases, he said.</div>
<div>&quot;The goal is that all of U.S. law enforcement will be able to look at each other's records to solve cases and protect U.S. citizens,&quot; McNulty said. &quot;With OneDOJ, we will essentially hook them up to a pipe that will take them into its records.&quot;</div>
<div>McNulty and other Justice officials emphasize that the information available in the database already is held individually by the FBI and other federal agencies. Much information will be kept out of the system, including data about public corruption cases, classified or sensitive topics, confidential informants, administrative cases and civil rights probes involving allegations of wrongdoing by police, officials said.</div>
<div>But civil-liberties and privacy advocates -- many of whom are already alarmed by the proliferation of federal databases -- warn that granting broad access to such a system is almost certain to invite abuse and lead to police mistakes.</div>
<div>Barry Steinhardt, director of the Technology and Liberty Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, said the main problem is one of &quot;garbage in, garbage out,&quot; because case files frequently include erroneous or unproved allegations.</div>
<div>&quot;Raw police files or FBI reports can never be verified and can never be corrected,&quot; Steinhardt said. &quot;That is a problem with even more formal and controlled systems. The idea that they're creating another whole system that is going to be full of inaccurate information is just chilling.&quot;</div>
<div>Steinhardt noted that in 2003, the FBI announced that it would no longer meet the Privacy Act's accuracy requirements for the National Crime Information Center, its main criminal-background-check database, which is used by 80,000 law enforcement agencies across the country.</div>
<div>&quot;I look at this system and imagine it will raise many of the same questions that the whole information-sharing approach is raising across the government,&quot; said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a Washington-based group that has criticized many of the government's data-gathering policies.</div>
<div>&quot;Information that's collected in the law enforcement realm can find [its way] into other arenas and be abused very easily,&quot; Rotenberg said.</div>
<div>McNulty and other officials said the data compiled under OneDOJ would be subject to the same civil-liberties and privacy oversight as any other Justice Department database. A coordinating committee within Justice will oversee the database and other information-sharing initiatives, according to McNulty's memo.</div>
<div>Gene Voegtlin, legislative counsel for the Arlington-based International Association of Chiefs of Police, said his group welcomes any initiatives to share more data with local law enforcement agencies.</div>
<div>&quot;The working partnership between the states and the feds has gotten much better than the pre-9/11 era,&quot; Voegtlin said. &quot;But we're still overcoming a lot of issues, both functional and organizational . . . so we're happy to see DOJ taking positive steps in that area.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3587</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3587</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Victories in the battle to save Christmas</strong><br />
By Carol Platt Liebau<br />
Monday, December 25, 2006<br />
<div>It&rsquo;s been several years since the term &ldquo;war on Christmas&rdquo; entered the American lexicon, denoting the politically correct effort to remove all potentially &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; religious elements from the public observation of the &ldquo;winter holiday&rdquo; that falls on December 25. Certainly emotions on both sides of the debate run high between those who welcome the reaffirmation of a common Judeo-Christian common culture (leavened by believers in other faiths or none at all), versus those who subscribe to the notion that celebrating &ldquo;diversity&rdquo; trumps all other considerations.
<div>For a long time, it seemed apparent that the latter were winning the argument. &ldquo;Happy holidays&rdquo; largely replaced Merry Christmas, &ldquo;holiday displays&rdquo; in stores supplanted areas once designated as &ldquo;Christmas shops.&rdquo; Even this year, there&rsquo;s been the usual, &ldquo;politically correct&rdquo; nonsense. The City of Chicago pressured organizers of the annual Christkindlmarket into eliminating New Line Cinemas &ndash; the studio that released The Nativity Story &ndash; as a sponsor. A city staff member in Riverside, CA, silenced Christmas carolers lest Jewish ice skater Sasha Cohen, who was present, take offense (the staffer obviously hadn&rsquo;t seen the invitation on Cohen&rsquo;s website to &quot;Join Sasha On Her Christmas Tree Lighting Tour&quot;). Worst of all, Target continues to ban Salvation Army bell ringers from seeking donations in front of their stores.
<div>Even so, this year &ndash; for the first time &ndash; there&rsquo;s been a sense that the tide is starting to turn. Companies that once rejected &ldquo;Merry Christmas&rdquo; are now embracing more faith-friendly terminology. Major stores like Wal-Mart (which still welcomes the Salvation Army), Macy&rsquo;s, J.C. Penney, Walgreen&rsquo;s, Sear&rsquo;s and Kohls are unabashedly referring to Christmas in their customer interactions. Food Lion, which had previously relied on messages referencing the &ldquo;holidays,&rdquo; likewise is using &ldquo;Merry Christmas.&rdquo; In general, &ldquo;holiday&rdquo; political correctness run amok no longer goes completely unchallenged; the Dallas Morning News condemned the city for erecting a &ldquo;downtown holiday tree,&rdquo; noting sarcastically that &ldquo;synagogues everywhere are dusting off their holiday candelabras.&rdquo;
<div>These changes, welcome as they are, didn&rsquo;t happen spontaneously. They came about because ordinary Americans, frustrated with the gradual &ldquo;de-Christianizing&rdquo; of Christmas, finally spoke up. Last year, nearly 300,000 people signed an online petition calling for a boycott of Target in part because of its refusal to use the phrase &ldquo;Merry Christmas&rdquo; in store advertising and promotions. And this year, a Wal-Mart spokesman conceded that the company had &ldquo;learned its lesson&rdquo; in the wake of its unpopular 2005 policy of forbidding employees to say &ldquo;Merry Christmas.&rdquo; Finally, it became clear that tailoring corporate policies to avoid offending the left-learning, politically correct crowd could, in fact, be costly.
<div>With all these favorable developments in the war on Christmas, there&rsquo;s a heartening reminder for ordinary Americans: As citizens in a capitalist country with a market economy, we wield great potential clout through our spending power. Contrary to what the press and the class warriors would have us believe, our voices (and our choices) do matter. But that power is ours only to the degree that we choose to use it &ndash; and too often, it&rsquo;s easy to stand by and watch with dismay as the culture veers ever leftward.
<div>Instead, wouldn&rsquo;t it be wonderful if we did something different in 2007? Imagine the impact if we approached a different issue &ndash; say, the marketing of sex to little girls through clothes, books, music, movies and television, and the internet &ndash; with the same fervor and conviction that&rsquo;s marked the defense of Christmas.
<div>In time, parents could find clothes for their daughters that seem appropriate for teens, rather than for streetwalkers. The plots of adolescent girl-oriented books and movies could focus on something other than sex. And young women might not find themselves singing along to songs with lyrics that, once upon a time, would have made a sailor blush.
<div>If there&rsquo;s a lesson from the victories in the war on Christmas, it&rsquo;s that they needn&rsquo;t be isolated successes. We have the ability (and the right) to improve the quality of our common culture in general &ndash; if only we decide to do so.
<div>Merry Christmas. God bless us every one. <br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3586</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3586</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="6">'Leave, crusaders, or have your heads cut off' </font></strong></div>
<p><br />
By Aqeel Hussein in Mosul and Colin Freeman, Sunday Telegraph<br />
<br />
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" border="0">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
            <div>The snow has already settled on the mountains further north, but the Christians of the Iraqi city of Mosul are scared to put festive decorations outside their homes this year. Their ancestors settled here in the 1st century AD, yet as teacher Jamal Fadi has discovered, some of their Muslim neighbours want this Christmas to be their last.</div>
            <div>&quot;A letter was delivered to my door with two bullets placed on top of it,&quot; said Mr Fadi, 32, standing watchfully in the neat garden of his two-storey villa. &quot;It said: 'Leave, crusaders, or we will cut your heads off.' They want us to go from Mosul completely.&quot;</div>
            <div>After months as a nervous bystander to the spiralling civil war between Sunni and Shia Muslims, Iraq's Christian minority now faces the spectre of sectarian violence coming to their traditional home city. They fear that al Qaeda-backed zealots within the Sunni community, which forms the bulk of Mosul's one million population, want to end nearly 1,500 years of co-existence with an onslaught of ethnic cleansing.</div>
            <div>Residents say that the campaign, which they claim has intensified in recent weeks, is prompted by Sunni fears of a complete Shia takeover of Baghdad in coming years. In response, Mosul would be turned into a northern capital for a Sunni-dominated enclave, which would include Saddam Hussein's home town of Tikrit and stretch south to the anti-American towns of Fallujah and Ramadi.</div>
            <div>The fact that no such blueprint has been endorsed by the Iraqi government is of little comfort to Christians. The plan's architects, they fear, are capable of enforcing it themselves through threats and indoctrination alone. For proof, they say, look no further than playgrounds, where Christian and Sunni Muslim children have played together for decades.</div>
            <div>
            <div>advertisement</div>
            </div>
            <div>&quot;Our children are told by other pupils that they are 'f***ing spies' who have brought the Christian occupation to Iraq,&quot; said Father Shamoun Butris, a Christian minister in Mosul. &quot;It is not true, but makes no -difference.&quot;</div>
            <div>Iraq's Christian community is made up of Eastern Rite Chaldean Catholics and Assyrian Orthodox Christians, and numbered around one million, or five per cent of the population, before the US-led invasion. Traditionally well-educated, they won respect in a Muslim land by specialising in teaching, academia and medicine, which earned them protected status under Saddam Hussein. Since his fall, those blessings have turned to curses. Their well-paid jobs have made them targets for kidnappers, while their grasp of English has fuelled suspicions that they work as translators for the US Army. In the past three years, 200,000 have fled abroad.</div>
            <div>So far, save for a few brief but bloody car-bombings against Christian churches, they have at least escaped the mass pogroms of the kind being meted out to each other by Sunnis and Shias. Now, however, they sense the start of a systematic campaign. Anxiety has been fuelled by reports in Mosul of Christian women being told to stop wearing Western clothes.</div>
            <div>Muslim leaders deny such claims. Yet the more hard-line clerics make clear that they no longer see Christians as part of Mosul's future. &quot;We want an Islamic society, and the Christians should leave because they follow the occupiers' religion,&quot; said Saad al Jibouri, from the Sunni Al Rahma mosque. &quot;We did not force them to leave, nor did we kill any of them.&quot;</div>
            <div>With talk now growing of partitioning Iraq into federal states for Sunni, Shias and Kurds, some Iraqi Christians want their own, autonomous zone in an area west of Mosul. But the plan has little chance of success with the Iraqi government, and with about half of their number still resident 250 miles away in Baghdad, it has limited support among Christians themselves.</div>
            <div>Despite feeling vulnerable, many Christians are reluctant to complain. Canon Andrew White, a British clergyman based in the Green Zone who administers to a 1,000-strong congregation at St George's Anglican Church in Baghdad, said: &quot;Christians keep stressing to me that they do not want to over-emphasise what they are going through for fear of it escalating. But things are bad.&quot;</div>
            <div>For some in Mosul, there is bewilderment at why the West &ndash; with its powerful Christian figures in George W Bush, Tony Blair and Pope Benedict XVI &ndash; cannot help. Among them is Firaz Adis, 51, who will pass this Christmas without his son Ricot, kidnapped from Mosul University four months ago. &quot;I paid a ransom of $10,000 but they killed my son anyway,&quot; he sobbed. &quot;They said 'This will keep happening as long as you are agents of the occupiers'. I ask all the Christians in the world: 'Please help us'.&quot;</div>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3585</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3585</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Pro-Life Group Hails ''Huge Win for Free Speech''<br />
</strong><font color="#000000" size="-1">Susan Jones</font><br />
<font color="#000000" size="-1">Senior Editor</font><br />
<br />
<font size="-1">(CNSNews.com) - A pro-life group calls it a &quot;huge&quot; win for free speech and grassroots lobbying: A federal court in Washington seems to have poked a tiny hole in the McCain/Feingold Campaign Finance Law by ruling that political ads sponsored by grassroots groups may air within 30 days of an election.<br />
<br />
At issue were three television and radio ads that Wisconsin Right to Life aired in 2004. <br />
<br />
The ads informed the public that U.S. senators were filibustering President Bush's conservative judicial nominees, and the ads asked viewers to urge Sens. Russ Feingold and Herbert Kohl (Wisconsin Democrats) to oppose the filibusters.<br />
<br />
Wisconsin Right to Life filed a motion to air the ads within 30 days of the Wisconsin primary election. <br />
<br />
The McCain/Feingold law established a blackout period 30 days prior to a primary election and 60 days prior to a general election where groups may not mention the name of a candidate on the ballot. In 2004, Senator Feingold was on the primary election ballot. <br />
<br />
&quot;Wisconsin Right to Life successfully argued that grassroots lobbying ads which do not mention or refer to elections should be allowed to be aired as a free speech right protected by the First Amendment, and the court agreed,&quot; said Barbara Lyons, executive director of Wisconsin Right to Life. <br />
<br />
&quot;One of the most basic rights enjoyed by our democracy is one which allows citizen groups to petition the government on issues of public interest. It is extremely gratifying to know that our courts are willing to protect such a basic right,&quot; she added. <br />
<br />
The federal court rejected arguments by the Federal Election Commission that the ads in question were a thinly disguised attempt to influence the 2004 election. <br />
<br />
&quot;Fortunately, the court disagreed with this distorted description of our ads,&quot; said Lyons. <br />
<br />
An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is expected, Wisconsin Right to Life said.<br />
<br />
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3584</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3584</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Religious People Are More Charitable, Says Expert<br />
</strong><font size="3">By Monisha Bansal<br />
CNSNews.com Staff Writer<br />
December 19, 2006<br />
<br />
<strong>(CNSNews.com)</strong> - Faith &quot;swamps&quot; all other factors when it comes to which Americans give to charity and which don't, an economics professor said Monday.<br />
<br />
&quot;People give because of their values,&quot; Arthur Brooks of Syracuse University said during a discussion at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C.<br />
<br />
Brooks' research has found that more than 90 percent of those who regularly attend a house of worship -- regardless of religion -- give to charity. Among secular Americans, the number falls to about 66 percent. Religious people also give more -- an average of $2,210 annually as opposed to $642, he said.<br />
<br />
&quot;About 25 percent of Americans do nothing,&quot; Brooks stated.<br />
<br />
&quot;Religion is really the key,&quot; he said. &quot;It swamps everything. It has nothing to do with income, race or region of the country.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;I have never found in any measure where secular people give more than religious people,&quot; Brooks noted.<br />
<br />
Even secular charities benefit more from donors who have a religious faith than they do from secular donors. Religious people are 10 percent more likely to give to secular causes than secular people, he said.<br />
<br />
&quot;If it were not for religious people in your community, your PTA would shut down,&quot; Brooks added.<br />
<br />
But Brooks also found that &quot;charity follows political lines in this country,&quot; with conservatives more generous in their charitable giving than liberals -- a factor he linked to the idea that more conservatives tend to be religious, rather than to political ideology.<br />
<br />
He said the number of religious conservatives is growing, while the population of religious liberals is shrinking. Religious liberals are three times more likely to switch parties than secular conservatives. He said this is because, overall, Americans believe the Republican Party is twice as friendly toward religion.<br />
<br />
According to Brooks, 33 percent of Americans attend a house of worship every week, while 26 percent say they never do.<br />
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3494</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3494</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Valedictorian Silenced Over Her Christian Faith Will Go to Court<br />
</strong><font size="3">By Nathan Burchfiel<br />
CNSNews.com Staff Writer<br />
December 19, 2006<br />
<br />
<strong>(CNSNews.com)</strong> - A high school student whose commencement speech was cut off when she spoke about her Christian faith will have her case heard in a federal court.<br />
<br />
A federal judge in Nevada ruled Monday that a debate over freedom of religious expression in public school commencement ceremonies will go to court.<br />
<br />
The charges stem from a June 15 incident at Foothill High School in Henderson, Nevada, when school administrators cut off valedictorian Brittany McComb's commencement speech after she strayed from a pre-approved script. Earlier, they had removed from her speech references to the Bible and her faith.<br />
<br />
McComb described God's love as &quot;something we all desire. It's unprejudiced, it's merciful, it's free, it's real, it's huge, and it's everlasting.&quot; Then the microphone was switched off.<br />
<br />
Amateur video of the ceremony showed graduates and their families cheering and booing as McComb continued to deliver her speech without the microphone. Audience members heckled administrators as McComb argued with them onstage.<br />
<br />
After the ceremony, attorneys with the Virginia-based Rutherford Institute filed suit in the U.S. District Court in Nevada, accusing the administration of violating McComb's First Amendment right to freedom of speech and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process.<br />
<br />
At the time, Rutherford Institute President John Whitehead told <strong>Cybercast News Service</strong> that McComb was not asking the court to award damages beyond declaring the school's actions unconstitutional.<br />
<br />
On Monday, Judge Robert C. Jones rejected the school's motion to dismiss the case, clearing the way for discovery hearings to begin after school attorneys file a response to the accusations.<br />
<br />
&quot;We're pleased that the court recognizes the validity of Brittany McComb's claims,&quot; Whitehead said in a statement. &quot;This is an important first step in protecting Brittany's right to free speech.&quot;<br />
<br />
Officials from Foothill High School could not be reached for comment Monday because school offices are closed for winter break. Bill Hoffman, general counsel for the Clark County School District where Foothill is located, did not respond to a request for comment by press time.<br />
<br />
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in <em>Lassonde v. Pleasanton Unified School District</em> (2003) that schools can censor religious speeches that proselytize because they give the &quot;appearance of government sponsorship of religion.&quot; <br />
<br />
The Supreme Court declined to hear the case, allowing the Ninth Circuit's decision to stand. Religious freedom advocates expect that decision to be revisited as soon as another circuit issues a ruling contradicting the Ninth Circuit's opinion.<br />
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3493</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3493</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Global Warming Fanatics Warming Up to Evangelicals 12/19/2006</strong><br />
By Lindsay Randall</div>
<div>What's the real tactic?</div>
<div>The producer of a movie on global warming that is being shown in Evangelical churches has admitted she believes earth's true problem is too many people.
<div>
<div>Karen Coshof, producer of &quot;The Great Warming,&quot; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/Culture/Archive/200611/CUL20061102a.html">said</a> in a Cybercast News Service interview, &quot;Population is the underlying problem - the catalyst for the whole thing, but we didn't get into that in the film. That is the underlying problem - too many people - all in competition for the same resource.&quot;
<div>
<div>&quot;The Great Warming&quot; has been endorsed by Christian organizations such as the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thegreatwarming.com/pdf/NAERichardCizik.pdf">National Association of Evangelicals</a> and prominent <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thegreatwarming.com/calltoaction/listenfaithleaders.html">pastors</a>. They find themselves in a strange camp aligned with <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thegreatwarming.com/calltoaction/ourallies.html">organizations</a> that promote population control, an ideology that considers human beings a blight on the earth rather than creative and resourceful individuals with unique worth.
<div>
<div>One organization, the Sierra Club, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sierraclub.org/policy/conservation/population.asp">states</a>, &quot;The 'population explosion' has severely disturbed the ecological relationships between human beings and the environment. It has caused an increasing scarcity of wilderness and wildlife and has impaired the beauty of whole regions, as well as reducing the standards and the quality of living. In recognition of the growing magnitude of this conservation issue, the Sierra Club supports a greatly increased program of education on the need for population control.&quot;
<div>
<div>&quot;Population control,&quot; the way to solve &quot;overpopulation,&quot; is to reduce the number of people or depopulate the earth. China's brute policy of forced abortions, forced sterilization and infanticide is a prime example of population control. American scientist Eric Pianka has <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/apr/06040603.html">suggested</a> releasing the Ebola virus to wipe out 90 percent of the population.
<div>
<div>&quot;It would likely be a surprise to Evangelicals to learn what is the true point of this movie,&quot; says Concerned Women for America President Wendy Wright. &quot;Trying to convince Christians about global warming is merely a path to gaining approval for harsh policies that demean and destroy God's crowning creation, what the Earth was created to support.&quot;
<div>
<div>Startling evidence that &quot;The Great Warming&quot; is a political tool to harvest Evangelical voters for left-wing politicians can be found on its Web site. The movie backers have <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thegreatwarming.com/calltoaction/ally-cgs.html">teamed</a> up with Democratic strategists Common Good Strategies (CGS). Its mission is to &quot;provide Democratic elected officials, candidates and state parties with the expertise, understanding and resources that will allow them to authentically engage and connect with America's diverse religious communities.&quot;
<div>
<div>Its Web site states, &quot;CGS can help Democrats tap into the resources available through the religious community to turn out volunteers&hellip;&quot; and &quot;CGS can help campaigns develop message and communication strategies that will resonate with religious voters.&quot;
<div>
<div>CGS founder and president Mara Vanderslice was the Director of Religious Outreach for the Kerry-Edwards 2004 presidential campaign. The campaign sidelined her when the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights revealed that she spoke at rallies co-sponsored by the radical homosexual group AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT-UP). These radicals have disrupted Mass at St. Patrick's Cathedral in 1989 and thrown the Eucharist on the floor, organized violent rallies in Seattle against the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in December 2000 and similar protests against the IMF and the World Bank to shut down D.C. in September 2002.
<div>
<div>Popular singer Alanis Morissette and actor Keanu Reeves point to what they see as the cause of global warming and narrate the film produced by Canada's Stonehaven Productions. &quot;What if a single species [humans] became so powerful that it began to change the planet itself?&quot; they <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thegreatwarming.com/video-alaniskeanu.html">ask</a> in promotional materials. &quot;It's happening now, and only one species has the power to stop it. Ours.&quot;
<div>
<div>The influence of the movie is not limited to the film itself. Promotional materials include bulletin inserts and a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thegreatwarming.com/pdf/SundaySchoolGuide.pdf">&quot;Leader's Guide&quot;</a> for Sunday school classes complete with discussion questions and a suggested prayer.
<div>
<div>This comes on the heels of a report authored by respected Evangelical leaders regarding the Evangelical Climate Initiative, a statement signed by 85 leaders on global warming. The report outlines how the Evangelical Climate Initiative misled prominent Evangelicals to engage in the &quot;problem&quot; of global warming by unwittingly supporting the left's pro-abortion and population-control agenda. It also follows statistics <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/2006/oct/10_10_2006_DvTempRank_pg.gif">released</a> in October by the National Climatic Data Center which reveals that the country is experiencing global cooling.
<div>
<div>&quot;This movie is part of a larger campaign to woo Evangelicals into supporting government policies that demean and destroy human beings,&quot; said Wright. &quot;In an age of heightened respect for human rights, which reflects God's value for each individual, churches are opening their congregations to teachings that human beings are a form of pollution.
<div>
<div>&quot;Global warming advocates claim that the hypothetical devastation will harm the poor the most. However, the catastrophic policies they demand would force the poor to live in squalor with no hope of a decent life. Their lives are cut short by lack of access to affordable energy that would refrigerate food, alleviating malnutrition and spoilage, and warm their homes, avoiding fatal pollution from burning waste.
<div>
<div>&quot;God has entrusted us with stewardship of the earth, and it is essential to take care of His creation. Chief among His creation is mankind.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3479</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3479</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">Pro-Life Nurse Refuses to Assist in Abortion of Down Syndrome Child</font></strong></div>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>As hospitals strong-arm health-care professionals to adopt abortion-friendly policies, one nurse is hailed a hero for clinging to her pro-life beliefs.</em>
<div>
<div>If you have ever wondered what difference one person can make, consider Mary Bauer. At 48, she changed careers, got a degree in nursing and accepted a position in the labor and delivery unit at a Chicago hospital. But it&rsquo;s what happened on her first day of work -- and her reaction to it -- that really set Bauer apart. </div>
<div>Fresh from orientation and looking forward to her new job, Bauer was told she would be assisting in the abortion of a 22-week-old preborn baby with Down syndrome.</div>
<div>&quot;I just told them, &lsquo;I can&rsquo;t take that patient. I&rsquo;m very pro-life. I cannot participate in any way, shape or form. I just can&rsquo;t do it, so I need an alternate assignment,&quot; Bauer said. </div>
<div>She went home that night, unsure of whether she would keep her job, and did two things. First, she requested prayer from friends; and second, she began researching Illinois law. Bauer said she found two statutes that protect the right of a health-care worker to object on moral grounds. </div>
<div>She went back to work and told her co-workers that they had the right to say no.</div>
<div>&quot;They never knew they had a choice,&quot; Bauer told Family News in Focus, &quot;and they said, &lsquo;We&rsquo;ve never had a choice. We always thought this was part of our job and we had to do it.' &quot; </div>
<div>Part of her prayer was answered. The hospital adopted a policy to protect workers from being forced to take part in morally objectionable tasks. But Chuck Donovan, executive vice president of the Family Research Council, said not everyone has such a happy ending.</div>
<div>&quot;I would be fearful that many health-care professionals suffer in silence and fear that there will be no one to come to their aid,&quot; he said. &quot;I would hope that that would not be the conclusion, but we have much work to do.&quot;</div>
<div>He&rsquo;s hopeful that even in the upcoming liberal Congress there will be movement on the Abortion Nondiscrimination Act. </div>
<div>Though the Down-syndrome baby was eventually aborted, Mary Bauer hopes that through the prayers of faithful friends around the world, abortion will one day cease. </div>
<strong>
<div>FOR MORE INFORMATION <em><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.family.org/resources/itempg.cfm?itemid=3598&amp;refcd=CE06LCZL&amp;tvar=no">Pro-Life 101</a></em>, by Scott Klusendorf is a powerful booklet which will teach you how to discuss the issue of abortion intelligently, compassionately and confidently. </div>
</strong></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3478</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3478</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">Texas Attorney: Case Will Test State Law on Religious Freedom<br />
</font></strong><font size="+0"><font size="1">
<div>By Allie Martin<br />
December 19, 2006</div>
<font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - The Texas Supreme Court has decided to hear a case that one attorney says could affect all states with religious freedom statutes. An attorney involved in the case -- <em>Pastor Barr and Philemon Homes, Inc. v. The City of Sinton</em> -- says it is will be the first case before the high court to interpret the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).</div>
<div>The case was filed after officials in the south Texas town of Sinton passed zoning laws barring from the community a ministry that focuses on helping non-violent criminals get their lives back on track after being released from prison. Philemon Homes wanted to operate a residential home for those inmates after their release.</div>
<div>Kelly Shackelford, chief counsel with <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.libertylegal.org/">Liberty Legal Institute</a> in Plano, says the zoning restrictions passed by Sinton officials are unconstitutional. &quot;What happened is that the city found out about this ministry of the church, and so they actually banned the ministry from the city,&quot; he explains. &quot;And they admitted that they passed these new zoning laws particularly because of this ministry.&quot;</div>
<div>According to Shackelford, the case involves the first test of a state law. &quot;This case not only involves the crucial religious freedom of churches to minister and change lives,&quot; he says; &quot;it also involves correctly interpreting the Texas [Religious Freedom Restoration Act] so the religious freedoms of every Texas citizen are restored in full.</div>
<div>&quot;You've got to be willing to stand,&quot; the attorney continues, &quot;because it's not only this church or this ministry but every church that is impacted. And when we stand, we stand for the freedoms of all our brothers and sisters in Christ.&quot;</div>
<div>Prison Fellowship, while not affiliated with the ministry in Sinton, has filed a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of Liberty Legal's case. Oral argument is expected this spring.</div>
</font></font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3477</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3477</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Memo to Congress: Judges must get out of our faith<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Lawmakers suggest 'gift' to courts: No more religious speech disputes</font><br />
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Bob Unruh<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>The Louisiana state Legislature has announced a desire to give a &quot;gift&quot; to the federal judiciary, especially those members who of late have debated the constitutionality of &quot;Merry Christmas&quot; greetings and other acknowledgments that there is, actually, a reason for the season.
<div>&quot;Whereas, the Louisiana Legislature recognizes that this is the season to give gifts and be charitable and an integral part of the season is the inclusion and acknowledgment of Jesus Christ,&quot; state senators said, &quot;Therefore, be it resolved that the Legislature of Louisiana memorializes the Congress of the United States to adopt the Constitution Restoration Act, thereby reducing the caseload of our federal courts by removing from their jurisdiction any and all cases involving the acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government as authorized by Article III, Section 2, of the United States Constitution.&quot;
<div>The issue, according to a retired Louisiana judge who now is a consultant, was approved unanimously in both houses of the Legislature, which was meeting in special session to deal with budgetary issues.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;It is appropriate that on Bill of Rights Day &ndash; December 15th &ndash; Louisiana's Legislature cared enough to unanimously pass two resolutions (HCR33 and SCR23) asking Congress to enact the Constitution Restoration Act (CRA),&quot; said Judge Darrell White, who finished 20 years of elected service on the Baton Rouge City Court in 1999, and consults for the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?www.lafamilyforum.org">Louisiana Family Forum.</a>
<div>&quot;Once adopted, this hope-inspiring federal legislation removes from federal court jurisdiction cases affecting the 'acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty or government,'&quot; he said in a letter to the editor promoting the issues. &quot;Religious free speech will again be treated like other free speech.
<div>&quot;After all, what better gift could America give to the God-In-Whom-We-Trust during this holiday season that to reaffirm the peoples' right to publicly acknowledge His existence?&quot;
<div>The resolutions noted that courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have debated the issues involved. In two opinions in 2005 alone, the nation's highest court found &quot;that it is inconsistent with the First Amendment to display the Ten Commandments in an outdoor public square in Texas, but not on the courthouse walls of two counties in Kentucky&hellip;&quot;
<div>The nation's own Constitution &quot;ends with an acknowledgment of Jesus Christ in Article VII, providing in pertinent part 'Done &hellip; in the Year of our Lord&hellip;'&quot; but people in the nation still are doubtful whether it is even constitutional to extend greetings of &quot;Merry Christmas,&quot; the resolutions said.
<div>The U.S. Constitution also makes no restriction on the ability of states, municipalities, or individuals to acknowledge God and the federal judiciary in recent years repeatedly &quot;has overstepped its constitutional boundaries and ruled against&quot; that.
<div>
<table align="right">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td width="160"><img height="200" width="160" border="0" alt="" /><br />
            <font size="1">Louisiana State Rep. Gary Beard</font></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<div>The House version of the resolution, authored by Rep. Gary Beard noted Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist, in a Texas case, referred to the &quot;duplicity&quot; of the court in telling local governments they may not display the Ten Commandments while at the same time allowing that same representation to be on the Supreme Court building.
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53141">WND has reportedly extensively on the multiple representations of the Ten Commandments at the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as what apparently is an organized campaign to change references to at least some of those to the &quot;Ten Amendments.&quot;</a>
<div>&quot;Since 1935, Moses has stood holding two tablets that reveal portions of the Ten Commandments written in Hebrew among other lawgivers in the south frieze,&quot; Rehnquist wrote. &quot;Representations of the Ten Commandments adorn the metal gates lining the north and south sides of the courtroom as well as the doors leading into the courtroom. Moses also sits on the exterior east fa&ccedil;ade of the building holding the Ten Commandments tablets.&quot;
<div>White said some &quot;simple clarity&quot; like acknowledging God as the nation's founders did &quot;might seem like coal in the stockings of some grinches this Christmas season, but no one should be allowed to steal Christmas &ndash; or America's unmistakable spiritual heritage.&quot;
<div>He said besides the wealth of acknowledgment to God, the Federalist Papers, in a section attributed by different groups to Alexander Hamilton or James Madison, offered assurance that the U.S. House, if there ever was a need, could return the country to the Constitution.
<div>&quot;We are warranted in believing, that if such a revolution should ever happen from causes which the foresight of man cannot guard against, the House of Representatives, with the people on their side, will at all times be able to bring back the Constitution to its primitive form and principles,&quot; it said.
<div>In White's letter to the editor, he noted that the Constitution Restoration Act, even though it had no congressional committee hearings in 2006, grew its support with 50 House members and 10 senators now onboard.
<div>&quot;And support will grow with each grinchy federal court ruling such as the one where ACLU-state-president-and-now-federal-district judge Helen Berrigan twisted the plain language of the First Amendment to grant the ACLU's demand that Tangipahoa Parish School Board stop opening its meetings in prayer,&quot; White said.
<div>&quot;Will Louisiana's 'Christmas Constitution Restoration Resolution's' grow legs and become the gift that keeps on giving? That depends on whether we are alert to danger,&quot; White said. &quot;All constitution-loving Americans should be shocked into action since last year's ruling by an unelected federal judge that told the elected Indiana House of Representatives how to pray!&quot;
<div>He said similar requests to Congress about the proposal have come from elected officials in Idaho, Missouri and Texas.
<div>&quot;May we pray that this same bipartisan 'we the people' spirit will kindle resolve among other freedom-loving Americans to follow suit,&quot; he said.
<div>White said he'd been disappointed in some areas of Republican accomplishment in recent years, including this area.
<div>&quot;Wouldn't it be like God for Hillary Clinton to grab onto this and say, 'I can get some mileage out of this,' or have Obama whatever-his-name-is say, 'I'm going to do this,'&quot; White told WND.
<div>The CRA, supported by former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/archives.asp?AUTHOR_ID=273">WND columnist Judge Roy Moore</a> would use Article III of the Constitution, which regulates the judiciary, to cap the activism that is putting many judges now in the position of ruling on whether a grade-schooler can sing a Christian song at a talent show, or whether Christian students can meet on a college campus, and similar issues.
<div>It specifically does not &quot;establish&quot; a religion. In 1954, Congress noted that, &quot;A distinction must be made between the existence of religion as an institution and a belief in the sovereignty of God.&quot;
<div>The resolutions are the second round for state lawmakers in Louisiana to encourage Congress to get this done. Lawmakers a year ago became the first state lawmaking assembly in the nation to endorse the CRA.
<div>White, who lives in Baton Rouge, La., also is founder of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://retiredjudges.org/">Retired Judges of America</a>. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3467</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3467</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Woman's freeway signs stir creation debate<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">'I have no idea what will happen &hellip; God will take it where He wants to take it'</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>A Minnesota woman who once thought creationism &quot;was absolutely nuts&quot; has bought a billboard in downtown Minneapolis and one in Duluth aimed at stirring debate over evolution.
<div>The messages &ndash; which cost about $10,000 each &ndash; point passersby to a website &ndash; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.whoisyourcreator.com/">WhoIsYourCreator.com</a> &ndash; where a case is made against Darwin's theory.
<div>&quot;Everyone has an opinion on evolution, Read ours. Post yours,&quot; says the billboard by Julie Haberle, 55, of Minnetonka.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>Haberle, a business consultant, told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune that God &quot;just put it in my head to have a billboard to refute evolution.&quot;
<div>Since dismissing creationism as &quot;nuts&quot; nine years ago, she has changed her mind, coming to the conclusion &quot;evolution is just silly.&quot;
<div>Haberle formed a nonprofit organization a few years ago and raised funds until she could afford her first two billboards, the Minneapolis paper said. She plans another one next month, possibly showing a human morphing into an ape.
<div>&quot;I'm just a hack,&quot; she said, &quot;and I came up with the best arguments I could find. I wanted to give people the ability to reject the message of evolution. It's not my job to convince people, but if God opens their eyes, I wanted to give them the next step in understanding it.&quot;
<div>Her website refers to texts from pro-evolution websites such as the American Institute of Biological Sciences, American Geological Institute and Smithsonian's Institute of Natural Sciences to expose &quot;the confusion and lack of consensus on how evolution is thought to occur.&quot;
<div>Science educators who spoke to the Star-Tribune were not impressed with her effort.
<div>&quot;It's kind of standard creationism stuff,&quot; said Paul Z. Myers, a biology professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris and a critic of intelligent design. &quot;It's not a serious site &ndash; it's just chunks of arguments strung together.&quot;
<div>But Haberle acknowledges she's not a scholar and doesn't &quot;pretend to have one original thought on the site.&quot;
<div>&quot;I just want people to realize evolution isn't a done deal,&quot; she said. &quot;It's a faith just like ours &ndash; it takes just as much faith to believe in evolution as creationism.&quot;
<div>The effort is strictly her own, she said, with no affiliation to her nondenominational church or any group.
<div>She said, however, she would like to get &quot;some kind of a media frenzy going with it&quot; and wouldn't mind if a megachurch or a major evangelistic organization spread her idea nationwide.
<div>&quot;I have no idea what will happen but figure God will take it where He wants to take it,&quot; she said. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3466</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3466</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<table width="100%" border="0">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>Va. Parishes Split From Episcopal Church<br />
            Dec 17 3:55 PM US/Eastern<br />
            </td>
            <td align="right"> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
            <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
                <tbody>
                    <tr>
                        <td>By MATTHEW BARAKAT<br />
                        Associated Press Writer<br />
                        <div>FAIRFAX, Va.<br />
                        </div>
                        </td>
                        <td valign="top"><span></span></td>
                    </tr>
                </tbody>
            </table>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<div>
<div id="isRegion"><font size="+0">Two of the most prominent Episcopal parishes in Virginia voted overwhelmingly Sunday to leave The Episcopal Church and join fellow Anglican conservatives forming a rival denomination in the U.S.
<div>Truro Church in Fairfax and The Falls Church in Falls Church plan to place themselves under the leadership of Anglican Archbishop Peter Akinola of Nigeria, who has called the growing acceptance of gay relationships a &quot;satanic attack&quot; on the church.
<div> 
<div>Truro rector Martyn Minns was consecrated a bishop by the Church of Nigeria earlier this year to lead Akinola's Convocation of Anglicans in North America.
<div>&quot;This has been our spiritual home, so separating is very hard,&quot; Minns said at a news conference announcing the parishes' decision. &quot;There's also the promise of a new day. A burden is being lifted. There are new possibilities breaking through.&quot;
<div>Virginia Bishop Peter Lee, a centrist, had won praise even from his critics for his extensive outreach to all sides in the conflict. He said Sunday that the votes &quot;had compromised these discussions and have created Nigerian congregations occupying Episcopal churches.&quot;
<div>Four other Virginia parishes have left, and eight more are voting or will vote soon whether to follow suit, according to the Virginia diocese. None is as eminent as Truro and Falls Church, however.
<div>A lengthy and expensive legal fight is expected over those historic church properties, which are worth millions of dollars. &quot;We fully intend to assert the church's canonical and legal rights over these properties,&quot; Lee said in a news release, calling it a &quot;sad day for the church.&quot;
<div>The Episcopal Church, the U.S. wing of the global Anglican Communion, has been under pressure from traditionalists at home and abroad since the 2003 consecration of the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire.
<div>Under Anglican tradition, Akinola's move into Episcopal territory amounts to an invasion, since archbishops agree not to start churches outside the borders of their own region. Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori will consult with her advisers on how the denomination should respond, said Bob Williams, the national Episcopal spokesman.
<div>While theological conservatives are a minority within the 2.2 million- member U.S. denomination, their protests have had an impact.
<div>Ninety percent of Falls Church parishioners and 92 percent of Truro members who cast ballots in the last week supported cutting ties with The Episcopal Church, parish leaders said.
<div>The loss is spiritual as well as financial; the parishes are among the largest and most vibrant in the diocese, together claiming more than 4,000 members.
<div>&quot;It was a very, very emotional time,&quot; said Jim Oakes, Truro's top lay leader, who supported the split. &quot;In some ways it's like a death in the family.&quot;
<div>Nationally, Episcopal researchers estimate that at least one-third of the nearly 115,000 people who left the denomination from 2003 to 2005 did so because of parish conflicts over Robinson.
<div>Seven of the 100 U.S. Episcopal dioceses have threatened to break from the denomination, but have so far stayed put. The closest any have come to leaving was a vote earlier this month in the Diocese of San Joaquin, in Fresno, Calif., endorsing a first step toward seceding. But that diocese must take a second vote next year before they can formalize a split.
<div>The feud has been far more damaging to the 77 million-member Anglican Communion.
<div>Most overseas Anglicans believe gay relationships violate Scripture and contend liberal interpretations of the Bible are far outside the bounds of mainstream Christian belief.
<div>Struggling to hold the communion together, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, the Anglican spiritual leader, has said that the communion may have to create a two-tier system of membership, with branches that ordain partnered gays given a lesser status.
<div>Akinola is among the conservatives who aren't waiting for a negotiated solution.
<div>In a statement Friday, Canon Kenneth Kearon, secretary general of the Anglican Communion, said that the archbishop of Canterbury has not &quot;indicated any support&quot; for the mission. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3465</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3465</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">Critic of Darwinism Questions Judge's Use of ACLU 'Facts' in Anti-ID Ruling<br />
</font></strong><font size="+0"><font size="1">
<div>By Jim Brown and Jenni Parker<br />
December 15, 2006</div>
</font><font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - A spokesman for a leading intelligent design think tank is questioning why the judge who banned any mention of the theory from a Pennsylvania school district is not responding to a report that suggests he plagiarized a significant portion of his ruling from the American Civil Liberties Union.</div>
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/12/122006a.asp">Earlier this week</a>, the Seattle, Washington-based Discovery Institute released a report showing that Judge John Jones copied his ruling in the case of <em>Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al.</em> almost word for word from a document prepared by lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Jones has refused to address the report in the press.</div>
<em>
<div>Kitzmiller </div>
<div>Jones found in favor of the plaintiffs and, in his 139-page opinion, adopted much of the plaintiff's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Since the ruling, which effectively banned any mention of ID theory in the Dover Area schools, the judge had defended his opinion publicly and at one point commented in an interview with the <em>Philadelphia Inquirer </em>that he &quot;assiduously tried to find the facts and apply the legal precedents to the facts as I found them.&quot;</div>
<div>However, Dr. John West, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.discovery.org/">Discovery Institute</a>'s vice president for public policy and legal affairs, says now that the judge's largely copied ruling has been brought to the public's attention, it appears that &quot;mum's the word.&quot; West says he finds it &quot;very interesting&quot; that throughout the whole year Jones has been speaking around the U.S. in various venues, discussing his decision, defending it, and even &quot;attacking anyone who criticizes it.&quot;</div>
<div>The judge has even spoken &quot;in some places apparently, from reports that I&rsquo;ve heard, about how much time he invested in writing the opinion,&quot; the Discovery Institute spokesman notes. And yet, he adds, &quot;now that the study comes out showing that the central part of [Jones's ruling] was taken virtually verbatim from the ACLU, he doesn&rsquo;t have anything to say.&quot;</div>
<div>The revelation that Jones' widely hailed ruling contained little original thought has put opponents of intelligent design on the defensive, West points out. So far, he says, the standard response from the Darwinists seems to be that &quot;judges do this all the time -- and in fact, we don&rsquo;t want judges writing their own opinion because they don&rsquo;t know what they're doing.&quot;</div>
<div>What these evolutionists are suggesting, West explains, is that Judge Jones's &quot;wholesale, uncritical copying&quot; of the ACLU's supposed findings of fact in <em>Kitzmiller </em>is actually &quot;the way it ought to be&quot; in such cases. In fact, the intelligent design proponent notes, &quot;there was one Darwinist on a Darwin blog who actually said something like that.&quot;</div>
<div>The Discovery Institute official says he finds these evolutionists' defenses &quot;very illuminating.&quot; However, he insists that Jones's lifting of much of his ruling from the ACLU's documentation cannot and should not be considered model judicial practice.</div>
<div>If judges &quot;rubber stamp&quot; the proposed findings of fact from one of the parties without attribution, West contends, that action compromises the independent judgment they are expected to exercise in the case.</div>
<div align="right"><font size="-2">&copy; 2006 AgapePress all rights reserved.</font></div>
</em>involved the first direct challenge brought in United States federal courts against a public school district that required the presentation of intelligent design (ID) theory as an alternative to Darwinian evolution as an explanation of the origin of life. The plaintiffs, represented by the ACLU, argued successfully that ID is a form of creationism and that the school district's policy therefore violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.</font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3464</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3464</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Your Input Needed on Proposed Rules for Tribal Off-Reservation Casinos</font></strong></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Tuesday is the deadline for public comments on rules concerning the recent practice of &quot;reservation shopping&quot; or &quot;casino shopping&quot; by Indian tribes. </div>
<div>Chad Hills, gambling policy analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said citizens should be concerned because, under proposed rules the federal government is considering, Indian tribes could build casinos on off-reservation sites -- regardless of your opinion, your vote or input from your state legislature. </div>
<div>&quot;Your neighbor's backyard could host the next large-scale Indian casino, and you'd have little say in the matter,&quot; Hills told <em>CitizenLink</em>.</div>
<div>Hills is asking concerned citizens to take action by reading about the proposed rules and then faxing or e-mailing comments to the decision makers in Washington, D.C., before Dec.19. </div>
<strong>
<div>TAKE ACTIONTo learn more, please see the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/FOSI/gambling/A000003400.cfm">Focus on Social Issues Web site</a>. </div>
<em>
<div>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</div>
</em></strong></div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3463</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3463</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="3">
<div align="left"><strong>Senior Housing Facility Orders Wings Cut from Angel on Christmas Tree</strong><br />
<em>Housing Facility Faces Possible Lawsuit for Religious Discrimination </em></div>
</font>
<div align="left"><font size="3">Orlando, FL &ndash; Seniors living in an Orlando area retirement home are facing blatant religious discrimination because of censorship of Christmas in their homes. Liberty Counsel is intervening to defend the religious freedom of residents, and faxed a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lc.org/attachments/ltr_orlandocloisters.pdf">demand letter</a> to the Orlando Cloisters.</font></div>
<div align="left"><font size="3">The management at an Orlando area retirement home, Orlando Cloisters, issued a directive to strip the common areas of any religious symbols or words in Christmas displays. At the management&rsquo;s direction, an employee at Orlando Cloisters cut the wings off the angel that was on top of the Christmas tree. Later, the angel was replaced with a Santa Claus. Angels were also removed from a display by the elevator in a hallway on one of the residence floors.</font></div>
<div align="left"><font size="3">The management issued a directive to the residents explaining that &ldquo;Christmas trees, Santa Claus, wreaths, Hanukah Menorahs and &lsquo;Seasons Greetings&rsquo; are all acceptable, as these items are not considered religious symbols.&rdquo; Menorahs are indeed, religious symbols. </font></div>
<div align="left"><font size="3">The Federal Fair Housing Act protects people against discrimination in housing, including religious discrimination. The retirement home cannot legally censor out the Christian aspects of the Christmas holiday.</font></div>
<div align="left"><font size="3">Anita Staver, President of Liberty Counsel, commented, &ldquo;I am astounded that the management would show disregard for the residents&rsquo; religious beliefs by cutting the wings off an angel on their Christmas tree! The management of Orlando Cloisters has sent a clear message that Christians are not welcome. I have great compassion for the elderly and cannot stand to see any of them deprived of the joy of Christmas.&rdquo;</font></div>
<div align="left"><font size="3">Staver continued: &ldquo;We will call upon the federal government to issue Christmas guidelines designed to prevent religious discrimination that often occurs in senior living facilities. If Christmas is censored from these precious ones, we all lose a piece of our religious freedom.&rdquo;</font> </div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3404</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3404</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<table cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" width="95%" align="center" border="0">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td colspan="2"><font color="#000000" size="4"><strong>U.S. &lsquo;staggering&rsquo; from pornography, organizer says</strong></font> <br />
            <font color="#000000" size="2">By Staff <br />
            Dec 13, 2006 </font><br />
            <br />
            </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td colspan="2"><font size="+0">KANSAS CITY, Mo. (BP)--&ldquo;Society is staggering from the effects of over-promiscuity,&rdquo; Philip Cosby of the National Coalition for the Protection of Children and Families told a chapel audience at Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.<br />
            <br />
            Cosby, who heads the coalition&rsquo;s work in the Kansas City, Mo., area, referenced Promise Keepers surveys showing that pornography had invaded the lives and homes of more than half the men in attendance.<br />
            <br />
            Since his retirement from a 22-year Army career, Cosby has been at the front lines of the war against pornography and, as the law calls them, &ldquo;sexually oriented businesses&rdquo; SOBs in three cities.<br />
            <br />
            Cosby first moved to Abilene, Kan., a &ldquo;Norman Rockwell town&rdquo; as he describes it, completely unprepared for the ambush of a pornography outlet, the Lion&rsquo;s Den.<br />
            <br />
            Having just moved there, Cosby knew no one and no one knew him. However, he knew something had to be done, and his efforts resulted &ldquo;Operation Daniel,&rdquo; in which he and 140 other men stood 24 hours a day, seven days a week at the outlet for 100 days.<br />
            <br />
            &ldquo;That truck traffic came to a screeching halt for 100 days at that place as we stood there,&rdquo; said Cosby, referring to the stand against sexual immorality that even made its way into the Chinese mainland press.<br />
            <br />
            Since then, Cosby has continued to study the law concerning SOBs, which he says is on the side of Christians and in agreement with Scripture.<br />
            <br />
            On the federal level, an obscenity prosecution task force is becoming more and more active, Cosby said. The law allows for community standard trials for evidence in a community to be prosecuted as &ldquo;obscene.&rdquo;<br />
            <br />
            &ldquo;The courts agree -&ndash; sex businesses will increase crime [and they] will increase STDs [sexually transmitted diseases],&rdquo; Cosby said.<br />
            <br />
            Those in law enforcement understand the danger, having dealt with the rapists and the pedophiles, Cosby said, and they see what exacerbates the problem. However, the general population remains desensitized and indifferent and thus it is difficult to do anything about it.<br />
            <br />
            &ldquo;The Scripture calls it the deceitfulness of sin,&rdquo; Cosby said.<br />
            <br />
            After hearing of his success in Abilene, Cosby was invited to Wichita, Kan., where there were 18 porn shops within the city limits alone. While trying to determine how to tackle the problem, he saw the mayor of Wichita take a stand against the sexual immorality that had found its way into the city. Cosby worked with the mayor, explaining how zoning laws and community standard trials could work in their favor, and together they managed a major reform there.<br />
            <br />
            Most recently, Cosby was called to Kansas City, Mo., in an effort to retake the metro area from the clutches of sexual immorality.<br />
            <br />
            Cosby encouraged the seminarians in his Nov. 7 message to join him in the fight against the pornography industry by petitioning for grand jury action in which only the evidence, the law, the prosecutor and the judge would be involved in framing charges against sexually oriented businesses.<br />
            <br />
            Rick Schatz, president and CEO of the National Coalition for the Protection of Children and Families, closed with a challenge to guard their households and their children. Pornography problems too often begin with early exposure among children who need to be protected and taught by their parents before they may be exposed to pornography elsewhere.<br />
            </font></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3403</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3403</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>NYC Students Hope to Retain Terrorists' Name on Building<br />
</strong><font color="#000000" size="-1">Jeff McKay</font><br />
<font color="#000000" size="-1">Correspondent</font><br />
<br />
<font size="-1">New York City (CNSNews.com) - A New York college has ordered students to remove a sign naming an office on the taxpayer-funded campus after two American terrorists responsible for killings in the 1970s and later given haven in communist Cuba.<br />
<br />
City College of New York Chancellor Matthew Goldstein said in a statement Wednesday the name of the student center was &quot;unauthorized and inappropriate&quot; and said the sign bearing the names of the two radicals would be removed.<br />
<br />
But a left-wing students' group is considering legal action to challenge the move.<br />
<br />
The college decision came after police groups and others voiced outrage to learn that the office on the Harlem campus carries the names of terrorist bombmaker Guillermo Morales and Assata Shakur, the convicted killer of a policeman.<br />
<br />
The Guillermo Morales/Assata Shakur Community and Student Center is home to a student group called the Student Liberation Action Movement (SLAM) whose mission - according to its website - is &quot;to participate in the building of a radical student and youth movement.&quot;<br />
<br />
Harlem SLAM spokeswoman Neha Gautam told Cybercast News Service Wednesday the group was &quot;discussing procedures&quot; following the chancellor's decision.<br />
<br />
&quot;We have a lawyer, and we will be meeting with the school administration,&quot; she said.<br />
<br />
Assata Shakur is one of many aliases used by Joanne Chesimard, a member of the Black Liberation Army who was handed a life sentence after being found guilty of the execution-style killing of a New Jersey State Trooper during a routine traffic stop in 1973.<br />
<br />
SLAM members consider Chesimard to be a &quot;role model&quot; who was &quot;innocent.&quot;<br />
<br />
The group's 10-point philosophy calls for actions including an &quot;end to police terror on campus, the police to be permanently banned from the university, an end to the 'war on drugs' and the frenzy of prison construction,&quot; as well as an &quot;end to the capitalist system.&quot;<br />
<br />
The group's office, located on the third floor of a campus building, has reportedly carried the names of Morales and Shakur for more than a decade, but the fact was revealed to the broader public this week by the New York Daily News tabloid.<br />
<br />
The National Association of Chiefs of Police released a statement slamming &quot;the cowardly school administration at the City College of New York&quot; for allowing the office &quot;be named in honor of a domestic terrorist and cop-killer.&quot;<br />
<br />
In an editorial Tuesday, the Daily News said the message sent by the office's name &quot;is that, as an institution, CCNY supports, endorses and celebrates the lives and crimes of two fugitive murderers.&quot;<br />
<br />
Morales was a bombmaker and member of the Fuerzas Armadas de Liberaci\'f3n Nacional or Armed Forces of National Liberation ( FALN), a terrorist group set up to fight for Puerto Rican independence from the United States. <br />
<br />
He was implicated in several bombings in New York City in the 1970s which killed six people, including the 1975 bombing of an historic tavern, which cost four lives.<br />
<br />
Morales was captured when a bomb he was making exploded prematurely, maiming him. At the time, police found more than 60 sticks of dynamite and other bomb-making components.<br />
<br />
Facing the prospect of a lengthy jail term, Morales in 1979 escaped police custody by climbing out a hospital window and spent several years on the run followed by a five-year prison term in Mexico, before seeking refuge in Cuba. He is reportedly now in his mid 50s.<br />
<br />
During his last year in office, former President Bill Clinton controversially granted pardons to some members of Morales' terror group, saying it was on condition that they renounced violence.<br />
<br />
Chesimard, also known as Assata Shakur, escaped from a New Jersey prison in 1979 and went to Cuba where the Castro regime granted her asylum, according to the FBI.<br />
<br />
The FBI still lists Chesimard, now aged either 54 or 59, as a &quot;most wanted&quot; fugitive, and a $1 million bounty is offered for her capture.<br />
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3402</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3402</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">New Jersey Pastor Banned From Praying in the State Senate</font></strong></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>A pastor who prayed at the opening of Monday's New Jersey Senate session will not be invited back, because his prayer condemned same-sex marriage, the <em>Star-Ledger</em> reported.</div>
<div>A Senate committee intended to forward a bill designed to give homosexual couples the right to civil unions that day. </div>
<div>The Rev. Vincent Fields said he didn't plan to mention gay marriage, but &quot;the Holy Spirit took over.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;We curse the spirit that would come to bring about same-sex marriage,&quot; he prayed. &quot;We ask you to just look over this place today -- cause them to be shaken in their very heart in uprightness, Lord, to do what is right before you.&quot;</div>
<div>Senate President Richard Codey said invocations are not supposed to be political or divisive, and Fields went out of bounds.</div>
<div>&quot;He will not be back,&quot; he said.</div>
<div>Fields said Codey's sentiment does not bother him; he does not regret the prayer.</div>
<div>&quot;We're living in a time now where we've got to take a stand spiritually,&quot; he said. &quot;We're literally setting ourselves up for God to turn His back on us, and if we do, we'll have the chaos (that's) in other countries in this country.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3367</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3367</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">U.N. Approves Disability Treaty Rife with Pitfalls</font></strong></div>
<div>by Pete Winn, associate editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Pro-family experts say loose language could turn a positive agreement into a big negative.</em>
<div>
<div>United Nations delegates today approved a world treaty guaranteeing the rights of people with disabilities. But pro-family experts say what is intended for good could wind up being misused for evil.</div>
<div>Thomas Jacobson, Focus on the Family Action's representative to the U.N., said the idea behind the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is good -- even though it deals with an issue that should probably be left up to individual nations. But the international body has raised to an art the use of phrasing that appears to mean one thing, but is regularly interpreted to allow abortion and euthanasia.</div>
<div>Some of the language in the treaty, he said, is extremely pro-life. For example, the preamble talks about &quot;the inherent worth and dignity&quot; of all people, including those with disabilities -- while other sections guarantee the right to life and to family, at least on the surface.</div>
<div>However, there are also some serious pitfalls, Jacobson said. </div>
<div>&quot;It's ironic that a draft convention (treaty) designed to protect persons with disabilities could actually be used -- if it is misinterpreted in certain ways -- by countries that want to do exactly the opposite,&quot; he said. </div>
<div>Jacobson cites Article X of the convention, which reads: &quot;State parties reaffirm that every human being has the inherent right to life, and shall take all necessary measures to ensure its effective enjoyment by persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others.&quot;</div>
<div>Note carefully, Jacobson said, that the treaty doesn't say that &quot;every person with disability&quot; or &quot;every preborn child with a disability&quot; has the right to life.</div>
<div>&quot;It says 'every human being,' &quot; he noted. &quot;In some countries, like the United States, preborn children are not considered lawful human beings and are not protected by the laws.&quot; </div>
<div>The treaty also could be interpreted to mean that if a nation allows any preborn babies to be aborted, it must allow disabled or deformed babies to be aborted. </div>
<div>Another problematic provision, dealing with home and family, says that persons with disabilities have &quot;the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of their children&quot; -- and it requires nations to provide whatever means are necessary to exercise these rights. </div>
<div>&quot;The only way you can control the spacing of your children, if you are pregnant, is to eliminate the child you don't want,&quot; Jacobson said. &quot;That could be twisted for abortion.&quot;</div>
<div>Moreover, for the first time in U.N. history, this treaty would make access to &quot;sexual and reproductive health services&quot; an international human right.</div>
<div>&quot;Sadly, the World Health Organization, other U.N. entities and a number of countries interpret that language to not only include contraception, but also abortifacients and abortion,&quot; Jacobson noted. </div>
<div>He said while many nations in the U.N. oppose abortion, it often ties aid to the acceptance of abortion as a form of &quot;reproductive health care.&quot; </div>
<div>The treaty language could be misused by some nations to justify other highly questionable practices, far beyond abortion and euthanasia. </div>
<div>&quot;If you are a disabled person in the Netherlands, they guarantee your sexual and reproductive rights and services,&quot; Jacobson said. &quot;Part of those 'services' is the fact that once a month a disabled person is provided with a prostitute. That is not the intent of this treaty. But that's probably how the Netherlands will interpret this.&quot; </div>
<div>Bill Saunders, human-rights counsel for the Family Research Council, said one might think that nations wouldn't ratify treaties that have such loopholes. </div>
<div>&quot;The weird thing is that nations will ratify treaties in which the language is not explained, and for which the parties have different interpretations as to what it means,&quot; Saunders told <em>CitizenLink</em>. &quot;It becomes problematic when the treaties call for treaty-monitoring bodies. Usually they are committees of 'experts', usually from the left, and they will typically say the language means something different than what you thought it did.&quot; </div>
<div>Because the General Assembly has approved the disability treaty, the U.N. will make it available for ratification by nations in March 2007. </div>
<div>&quot;If nations are going to ratify this, they should put in certain qualifiers,&quot; he added. &quot;They should say, 'We are ratifying this document with the understanding that it is designed to protect the inherent worth and dignity of every human being -- including those who are not yet born.'</div>
<div>&quot;They should also say that 'No article of the treaty shall be used to justify the termination of a preborn child who is disabled, or to euthanize any disabled person, at any point in life.' &quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3366</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3366</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Federal Judge Says <span id="lw_1166095187_47">San Francisco</span>'s Labeling of Catholics as &quot;Hateful&quot; is Constitutional</strong><br />
Urges Archbishop of <span id="lw_1166095187_48">San Francisco</span> and Catholic Charities to defy Church directives on adoptions by homosexuals<br />
<br />
<div>By John-Henry Westen <br />
<span id="lw_1166095187_49">SAN FRANCISCO</span>, December 13, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In March of this year the City of <span id="lw_1166095187_50">San Francisco</span> issued one of the most startling attacks on the Catholic Church coming from a governmental body in the <span id="lw_1166095187_51">United States</span> in half a century. The governing body of the city of <span id="lw_1166095187_52">San Francisco</span> - the Board of Supervisors - voted unanimously to approve a resolution blasting the Catholic Church for its opposition to homosexual adoption. That resolution has been deemed &quot;constitutional&quot; by Federal Judge Marily Hall Patel, in a recent ruling which is being appealed by the Thomas More Law Center.<br />
<br />
The resolution attacked the teaching of the Catholic Church that homosexual adoption does &quot;violence&quot; to children since they would be placed in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development. The resolution blasted the teaching as &quot;hateful and discriminatory rhetoric (that) is both insulting and callous, and shows a level of insensitivity and ignorance which has seldom been encountered by this Board of Supervisors.''<br />
<br />
District Judge Patel, a Carter appointee and one time counsel for the National Organization for Women (NOW), ruled that the Board resolution which, in addition to condemning Catholic moral teaching on homosexuality, urged the Archbishop of <span id="lw_1166095187_53">San Francisco</span> and Catholic Charities of <span id="lw_1166095187_54">San Francisco</span> to defy Church directives, does not violate the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. <br />
<br />
The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in <span id="lw_1166095187_55">Ann Arbor, Michigan</span>, is appealing the federal judge's recent approval of the virulently anti-Catholic resolution. <br />
<br />
Robert Muise, the Law Center attorney handling the matter, commented, &quot;Our constitution plainly forbids hostility toward any religion, including the Catholic faith. In total disregard for the Constitution, homosexual activists in positions of authority in <span id="lw_1166095187_56">San Francisco</span> have abused their authority as government officials and misused the instruments of government to attack the Catholic Church. Their egregious abuse of power now has the backing of a federal judge. This battle, however, is far from over. We are appealing this offensive ruling.&quot; <br />
<br />
The Law Center filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights and two Catholic residents of <span id="lw_1166095187_57">San Francisco</span>. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the appeal. <br />
<br />
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel for the Law Center, observed, &quot;This judge totally ignored or attempted to rationalize the evocative rhetoric and venom of the resolution which are sad reminders of Catholic baiting by the Ku Klux Klan.&quot; <br />
<br />
Continued Thompson, &quot;Federal judges across the country are removing passive religious symbols, such as the cr&egrave;che and the display of the Ten Commandments, from the public square because these innocent symbols supposedly express an official government endorsement of religion in violation of the Establishment Clause. However, when <span id="lw_1166095187_58">San Francisco</span> passes an overtly, anti-Catholic resolution expressly attacking Church moral teaching and calling on Church leaders to defy Church teaching as a matter of official government policy, a federal judge gives these anti-Catholic bigots a free pass. Unfortunately, this case amply demonstrates the anti-religious bias that pervades our judicial system.&quot; <br />
<br />
The Law Center's lawsuit claimed that the City's anti-Catholic resolution violated the First Amendment, which &quot;forbids an official purpose to disapprove of a particular religion, religious beliefs, or of religion in general.&quot; The Law Center argued that the &quot;anti-Catholic resolution sends a clear message to Plaintiffs and others who are faithful adherents to the Catholic faith that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community and an accompanying message that those who oppose Catholic religious beliefs, particularly with regard to homosexual unions and adoptions by homosexual partners, are insiders, favored members of the political community.&quot; <br />
<br />
In her decision upholding the resolution against the Law Center's constitutional challenge, the federal judge defended the City by essentially claiming that the Church invited the attack by publicly expressing its teaching on moral issues. In her written opinion, the judge stated, &quot;The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith provoked this debate, indeed may have invited entanglement, by its [doctrinal] statement. This court does not find that our case law requires political bodies to remain silent in the face of this provocation.&quot; <br />
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3365</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3365</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>'Tis the Season to Ruin Your Budget<br />
</strong><font color="#000000" size="-1">Steve Scalici, CFP(r)</font><br />
<font color="#000000" size="-1">Treasure Coast Financial</font><br />
<br />
<font size="-1">
<div>Be jolly? Not in America. Over 45 per cent of those who responded said that they dread the festive season.<sup>1</sup> The top three reasons cited for this are:</div>
<ul>
    <li>Christmas has become too commercial. </li>
    <li>A feeling that everyone is having a better time than you. </li>
    <li>Spending far too much money. </li>
</ul>
<div>As much as I would like to play psychologist, I am not qualified to do so, so I will stick to the financial side of Christmas. As you can see above, two of the top three reasons we dread Christmas are related to financial issues: Christmas has become too commercial and we spend far too much money. How do we buck this trend? We must remember that Christmas is a celebration of Christ&rsquo;s birth. That sounds simple, but it&rsquo;s easy to get caught up in the commercialization of Christmas. In early October, I was in a store with my six year old daughter and she asked me why they already had Christmas decorations in the store. Even at six years old, she realizes the absurdity of this.</div>
<div>Of course, we give gifts in remembrance of God giving us His Son. There&rsquo;s nothing wrong with giving gifts. It&rsquo;s actually a nice thing to do. But, many of us get so caught up in the gift giving that it consumes us and causes us lots of anxiety when we spend too much money.</div>
<div><strong><u>Have a plan</u></strong></div>
<div>Good decisions begin with a plan. Unfortunately most people give out of compulsion rather than delight. That's why Christmas shopping can seem overwhelming. Planning your gift-giving will not only save you money, but can also help you to enjoy the true meaning of the season.</div>
<div>I don't know about you, but I am not a shopper. I go in, get what I want and get out. I am a retailer's worst nightmare. All those fancy signs they make to entice us to buy more stuff don't faze me at all. Yet, even if you love to shop, you ought to decide before you go to the store exactly who you are buying for, what you can spend on each person and, as best as you can, determine in advance what you want to buy for each person. Whatever you do, don't spend on the fly. Even if you do not know exactly what you are going to buy, know what you are going to spend.</div>
<div><strong><u>Assign a dollar value for each person</u></strong></div>
<div>It is important to have a firm overall budget. Decide how much you are going to spend in total this Christmas. If your overall budget is $500 do not spend $600 just because it does not max out your credit card. Also, do not try to spend equal amounts of money on each person. For example, if you spend $100 on one child and $150 on another, don't fret over it and feel like you have to buy something else for the first child to make them even. I know this sounds clich&eacute;, but it really is the thought that counts. </div>
<div><strong><u>Shop throughout the year</u></strong></div>
<div>About six years ago, we began buying our gifts throughout the year. My bride came up with the idea because our baby was due in November and she didn't think we would have time to shop after the baby came. Traditionally, we did all our shopping after Thanksgiving. But, that year we started shopping around June and we found that we had a lot less pressure, we were able to find better deals, and we bought gifts we knew our loved ones would like. Many have justified their procrastination by saying they work better under pressure. In reality, procrastination causes you to rush around at the last minute trying to make decisions. Solomon wrote: &quot;<em>The plans of the diligent lead surely to advantage, but everyone who is hasty comes surely to poverty</em>&quot; (Proverbs 21:5 NIV). The sad truth is procrastination is simply the tendency to put off until tomorrow what you could be doing today. </div>
<div><strong><u>Keep the main thing the main thing</u></strong></div>
<div>Retailers have done a fabulous job of pushing their agenda to make us think we have to spend lots of money for Christmas. They entice us by opening their doors at 6 am the day after Thanksgiving. Give me a break! For the believer, Christmas should be about one thing, and that is celebrating the birth of Christ. I've heard all the arguments, &quot;But my kid wants this&quot; or &quot;I have to get them this game.&quot; No you don't. </div>
<div>I think we have to keep the main thing, the main thing. Of course, the main thing about Christmas is Jesus Himself. When we get away from that focus, we get sucked into believing that we have to buy things to make Christmas successful. Nothing could be further from the truth. The things we buy are only temporary, while our Savior is eternal. Now, am I saying you shouldn't buy gifts? Not at all. I'm just saying that you need to be wise with your money. When you focus on the importance of what God did for us by sending His Son as the ultimate sacrifice, that should drive you to give. But, we should go beyond blessing our loved ones and reach out to those that are less fortunate. Christmas time is the best time of year to share Christ's love with others. But, at the end of the day, we need to realize that every day for Believers is Christmas. We should celebrate Christ's birth each and every day and work to get that message out on a regular basis, not just during Christmas.</div>
<div><sup>1</sup> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.navis.gr/medico/xmas.htm">http://www.navis.gr/medico/xmas.htm</a><br />
<br />
</div>
<div><em><strong>Steve Scalici</strong> is the Vice President of Treasure Coast Financial, a financial planning firm in Stuart, FL. He is co-host of God's Money which can be heard weekdays at</em> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.oneplace.com/"><em>www.oneplace.com</em></a><em> . <span>He can also be reached at his website <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.tcfin.com/">www.tcfin.com</a> .<br />
</span></em></div>
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3364</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3364</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Democrats Said to Have Opposed John Bolton at UN Because he is &quot;Pro-Life, Pro-Family, Pro-Morality&quot;</strong><br />
Focus on the Family Says Bolton also shares views &quot;on condom distribution and abstinence&quot;<br />
<br />
By Hilary White and Peter J. Smith<br />
<span id="lw_1166012051_40">NEW YORK</span>, December 12, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - John Bolton, the straight-shooting Acting US Ambassador to the United Nations, announced his resignation last week sending shock waves through American conservative circles. Although Bolton's temporary appointment would have expired in January, he resigned because of opposition from the incoming Democrat-controlled Senate.<br />
Bolton's confirmation had stalled in the Senate more than a year, blocked by Democrats and some Republicans in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Democratic filibusters on the Senate floor. The ambassador twice garnered 54 votes and 56 votes - enough to win confirmation but just short of 60 votes needed to end a filibuster. <br />
President Bush said he was &quot;deeply disappointed that a handful of <span id="lw_1166012051_41">United States</span> Senators prevented Ambassador Bolton from receiving the up or down vote he deserved in the Senate.&quot;<br />
Shortly after the success of the Democrats in last month's mid-term elections, political watchers predicted that Bolton, a prominent &quot;hawk&quot; in Bush's foreign policy, would be forced out of his UN position. <br />
Bolton, who has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize for his opposition to <span id="lw_1166012051_42">Iran</span>'s nuclear proliferation, had not made himself popular with the ruling powers at the UN either. In 2000, he helped to expose the UN's attempt to establish itself as a global governing body that would supersede the sovereign rights of individual nations. Bolton warned that UN Secretary General Kofi Annan was attempting a &quot;coup d'&eacute;tat against the authority of the five permanent members of the Security Council.&quot;<br />
Bolton also led the Bush administration's opposition on constitutional grounds to the International Criminal Court, working to exempt Americans from any possible prosecution by the Court.<br />
Dr. Dobson and Focus on the Family President Jim Daly both described Bolton as a &quot;pro-life gentleman&quot; to listeners of their radio program. Bolton had extended to them &quot;an invitation to work with him in setting some policy there at the UN that would support the values we believe in.&quot; They had a private meeting with Bolton and concluded that Democrats were opposing him because &quot;he's pro-life, pro-family, pro-morality and sees things the way we do regarding condom distribution and abstinence and other things.&quot; <br />
However Howard Phillips, Chairman of the Conservative Caucus, remarked that Bolton's efforts as an ambassador defending life and family would have been undercut by the Bush Administration's continued financial support of the UN. &quot;If you're giving to the UN, you're making it possible for them to carry [Population Control Fund Activities] forward,&quot; Phillips stated, emphasizing the Administration has given more taxpayer funds to the UN than the previous Clinton Administration, which ends up supporting the UN in its anti-life anti-American agenda.<br />
&quot;I like John Bolton, he's a good man, but the problem with his service is that people tend to diminish hostility to the UN because of John's presence there. The problem is not with who represents us there, but that we're supporting an evil institution.&quot;<br />
Many conservatives predict that the <span id="lw_1166012051_43">United States</span> will suffer from the partisan rejection of Bolton, because it may discourage well-qualified nominees from public service.<br />
&quot;We can expect to see the Democrat-controlled Senate reject other nominees who do not march in lockstep with the Senate's liberal leadership,&quot; said Tom Minnery, senior vice president of Government and Public Policy at Focus on the Family Action. &quot;Good men and women will be denied the opportunity to serve their country -- despite their impeccable qualifications.&quot;<br />]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3363</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3363</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<h2>Judge Says 'Awesome God' Allowed in School Show</h2>
<div class="author"></div>
<div>
<div><em></em>
<div class="text">
<div>A federal court has ruled in favor of a New Jersey elementary school student who sought to sing a religious-themed song at a school talent show.</div>
<div>Last spring, school officials at Frenchtown Elementary School in Frenchtown, N.J., told the then-second-grader that she could not sing the Rich Mullins' song, &quot;Awesome God,&quot; because it contained an unacceptable stanza that had &quot;an overtly religious message and proselytizing nature.&quot;</div>
<div>The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, however, determined that it is viewpoint discrimination to exclude speech simply because it is divisive or controversial.</div>
<div>&quot;A song selected and performed by an individual student,&quot; the ruling said, &quot;(is) the private speech of a student and not a message conveyed by the school itself.&quot;</div>
<div>Jeremy Tedesco, legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, said religious speech should not be treated as second-class.</div>
<div>&quot;This court properly recognized that the school officials had violated this student's First Amendment rights by singling her out for censorship,&quot; he said, &quot;simply because the song she wanted to sing is one that expresses her religious faith.&quot;</div>
<div>Today's decision, Tedesco said, permanently prohibits the school from discriminating against religious speech within the context of its school talent shows.</div>
<div>&quot;Today's ruling is a tremendous victory for religious liberty and free speech,&quot; he said, &quot;especially for students.&quot;<br />
</div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3362</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3362</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Pentagon Evangelism Called 'National Security Threat'<br />
</strong><font color="#000000" size="-1">Nathan Burchfiel</font><br />
<font color="#000000" size="-1">Staff Writer</font><br />
<br />
<font size="-1">(CNSNews.com) - Christian military officers who share their faith at work in the Pentagon pose a threat to national security, according to a group that advocates for religious neutrality in the military.<br />
<br />
Public displays of faith by high-ranking military officers project an image of a Christian nation waging war on non-Christians, both inside and outside the United States, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation said Monday.<br />
<br />
This created an &quot;internal national security issue every bit as great as the one we're fighting outwardly,&quot; said the organization's president, Mikey Weinstein.<br />
<br />
&quot;The jihadists, the insurrectionists, everybody from the head of Hamas, Hizballah, the Islamic Jihad, the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, they see us as invading American imperialists and crusaders,&quot; he told a news conference in Washington, D.C.<br />
<br />
Weinstein, a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy who has been critical of proselytizing at the academy, called for an investigation into several officers who appeared in a promotional video for a Christian organization while in uniform.<br />
<br />
In addition to creating a national security threat, Weinstein said, evangelistic efforts by Christian officers directed toward their colleagues or subordinates amounted to &quot;coercion&quot; and &quot;fanatical unconstitutional religious persecution.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;There's a time and place to celebrate your faith or no faith,&quot; Weinstein said. &quot;There's so many times and places you can do it ... but there's a few times you can't, one of which would be when you wear your uniform during the duty day and duty night and you outrank somebody else and you're trying to push your religious faith on them.&quot;<br />
<br />
He called on incoming Defense Secretary Robert Gates to investigate a promotional video for the Christian Embassy, an organization that ministers to members of Congress, ambassadors, presidential appointees and Pentagon officials.<br />
<br />
Christian Embassy, established in 1975, works with government leaders &quot;not only because of their personal needs, but also because of their position as decision-makers to influence our families and freedoms,&quot; according to its website. At the Pentagon, the group holds weekly prayer meetings and Bible studies every weekday.<br />
<br />
In the promotional video cited by Weinstein, four generals and three colonels appear wearing their uniforms. Among them is Lt. Col. Lucious Morton, who says that Christian Embassy-led Bible studies benefit the military as a whole because they create &quot;Godly men&quot; who will lead others into battle.<br />
<br />
Maj. Gen. Jack Catton also appears in the video and says he shares his faith with people he meets in his office: &quot;I start with the fact that I'm an old-fashioned American, and my first priority is my faith in God, then my family, and then my country.&quot;<br />
<br />
Weinstein said the video raises questions about whether the officers followed military regulations that restrict appearances in uniform for non-military purposes.<br />
<br />
Their professions of faith violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from making laws &quot;respecting the establishment of religion,&quot; he argued.<br />
<br />
The video, which appears on Christian Embassy's website, carries a disclaimer that says &quot;the views expressed by any government officials in this video are their personal views and are not intended to represent the U.S. government nor any department in which they serve.&quot;<br />
<br />
Catton, director of requirements for Air Combat Command (ACC) at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia, has been criticized for sharing his faith before. Last May, he used his military e-mail account to support a retired general who was running for U.S. Congress.<br />
<br />
In that e-mail, Catton wrote: &quot;We are certainly in need of Christian men with integrity and military experience in Congress.&quot;<br />
<br />
Lt. Col Brian Maka, a spokesman for the DOD inspector general, declined to comment Monday on whether an investigation is underway, although media reports in May suggested that there was. <br />
<br />
'No evidence of coercion'<br />
<br />
Maj. Laurel Tingley, a spokeswoman for ACC, told Cybercast News Service Catton would not be commenting about the video because &quot;it's going to be something bigger than Air Combat Command or even something bigger than the Air Force.&quot; She referred further questions to the Department of Defense.<br />
<br />
Maj. Stewart Upton said Monday the DOD inspector general's office had received the complaint from Weinstein's group but added that it would be &quot;inappropriate ... for us to speculate as to what, if any, actions will be taken at this point.&quot;<br />
<br />
Upton added that DOD &quot;does not endorse any one religion or religious organization but we do provide opportunities for military service members to practice their faiths.&quot;<br />
<br />
Calls placed to Christian Embassy requesting comment for this report were not returned Monday.<br />
<br />
Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, criticized Weinstein for asking the DOD inspector general's office to spend time investigating the video. <br />
<br />
She said that because the video is accompanied by a disclaimer and does not ask for money, it doesn't raise concern with her.<br />
<br />
&quot;The Department of Defense inspector general has an awful lot of issues on their plate, on their agenda, and I don't see this as something so important that everything else should be put on hold,&quot; Donnelly told Cybercast News Service after viewing the video. &quot;The DOD IG has a lot more important things to do.&quot;<br />
<br />
She called it a &quot;stretch to talk about anything coercive,&quot; noting that a soldier engaging in religious activity such as prayer &quot;appears to be purely voluntary on the part of anyone who wants to participate.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;I don't see any evidence that this is a coercive type of environment,&quot; Donnelly said.<br />
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3361</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3361</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="_Article_divTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">A Plan for Making Your First Million </div>
<div id="_Article_divAuthor" style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Austin Pryor </div>
<div>
<div>Starting when you're 30, save $264 a month. Invest it in a tax-deferred account like an IRA, and earn an average return of 10% per year. When you turn 65, <em>voil&agrave;</em> , you'll have a million bucks (or so).</div>
<div>Of course, how much that will buy when you reach retirement is another story. Assuming 3% inflation, it will be worth about one-third as much as it is today. I throw that in only to impress you with the fact that, while $264 is a nice starting point, you'll probably want to set aside much more.</div>
<div>For now, however, the question is this: Do you <em>have</em> an extra $264 each month? Or let me put it this way: If your family were a business, would you be showing a profit of at least $264 a month? After all the income is counted and all the bills are paid, is there money left over? There better be, because that monthly surplus is the key to building your financial security.</div>
<div>If you're not sure you even have a monthly surplus (let alone how much it is), then you've got two choices. One, you can continue your &quot;easy come, easy go&quot; approach, spending your money according to your moods and whims of the day. That's a fun way to go through life-until you begin drowning in a sea of debt. Meanwhile, you're robbing yourself of the opportunity to move toward financial stability and security. By the time you come to your senses, it could be too late to redeem the situation.</div>
<div>Or, two, you can buckle down and develop a plan to guide your spending decisions. Sure, creating and living by a budget is a hassle. But if you're tempted to skip this important step, you do so at your peril. For 99.9% of us, living by a budget is absolutely essential if we're to progress financially. A winning and gratifying financial strategy begins with your monthly surplus. And making sure you have a monthly surplus begins with a workable budget and-there's no sense kidding ourselves-a healthy dose of self-discipline. A good spending plan can help you to:</div>
<div>&bull; Apply your current income more strategically as you reduce or eliminate frivolous or irresponsible spending.</div>
<div>&bull; Improve communication with your spouse as you set priorities.</div>
<div>&bull; Steadily eliminate your debt.</div>
<div>&bull; Raise your standard of living.</div>
<div>&bull; Equip yourself to withstand economic downturns.</div>
<div>&bull; Increase your giving to the Lord and His work.</div>
<div>&bull; Stay motivated by giving you a sense of accomplishment as you measure your progress.</div>
<div>&bull; Reach financial goals that would otherwise be unattainable.</div>
<div>&bull; Invest with regularity.</div>
<div>There are many resources available that will guide you through the process of putting together a workable spending plan. They generally follow an allocation-type strategy where all your expenditures are categorized and budgets assigned to each category. Spending is monitored weekly (or monthly) to make sure you're staying within the amounts allotted.</div>
<div>The &quot;how to&quot; workbook I'm most familiar with is the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.crown.org/cartproducts/product.asp?sku=FF205&amp;aid="><em><font color="#003399">Family Financial Workbook</font></em></a> by Larry Burkett. It shows you where to start and how to stay on track. It offers practical advice about managing your finances and provides a series of easy-to-follow worksheets that allow you to structure and maintain your family's budget.</div>
<div>A book by Ethan Pope called <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0842360484/qid=1135089806/sr=2-2/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_2?s=books%26v=glance%26n=283155&amp;tag2=soundmindinvs-20"><em><font color="#003399">Creating Your Personal Money Map</font></em></a> is also designed to help you set up a spending plan. The big emphasis here is the relative simplicity of the suggested record keeping system. If you've set up a system but then had trouble living with it, you might check Pope's approach out.</div>
<div>Another helpful resource that I can heartily recommend is <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0310222664/qid%253D1065472430/sr%253D11-1/ref%253Dsr%255F11%255F1/soundmindinvs-20"><em><font color="#003399">Money Talks and So Can We</font></em></a> by Ron and Judy Blue. The Blues provide a framework through which couples can successfully communicate about their finances. By specifically addressing some of the most common conflicts, this book provides practical advice and valuable tools couples can use to strengthen their marriages.</div>
<div>Now, back to planning tips. Here are some additional pointers on setting up a workable plan from Stephen and Amanda Sorenson in their book <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/080244931X/qid=1135090113/sr=1-19/ref=sr_1_19?s=books%26v=glance%26n=283155&amp;tag2=soundmindinvs-20"><em><font color="#003399">Living Smart, Spending Less</font></em></a>:</div>
<div>&bull; Be conservative in your income expectations. If you earn more than expected, you'll progress even faster.</div>
<div>&bull; Set money aside for taxes when your income first comes in. Many find it's best to put tax money into a special savings account.</div>
<div>&bull; Reflect the needs of individual family members in the spending plan. One child may need more money for sports equipment, for instance; another may need money for camp.</div>
<div>&bull; Give each responsible family member a little money to spend that doesn't have to be accounted for.</div>
<div>&bull; Stick with your plan until you have your income and expenses well in hand and can follow the basic plan naturally. If at any time you begin to lose control of your spending, return to the basics again.</div>
<div>If you want to be a millionaire, it's time to get serious. With a new year approaching, you have a new opportunity to take control of your financial future.<br />
<br />
<font size="2">&copy; Sound Mind Investing<br />
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3360</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3360</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">PJI Defends Pastor Accused of 'Hate Crime' for Distributing Tracts<br />
</font></strong><font size="+0"><font size="1">
<div>By Allie Martin<br />
December 12, 2006</div>
<font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - A California pastor has won a major victory for free speech after being accused of a hate crime by a Muslim individual who objected to the tracts the minister was distributing.</div>
<div>Pastor Audie Yancey is a retired U.S. Marine Corps veteran with 20 years of service. Recently, he appeared at the Palmdale City Council meeting holding a copy of the Qur'an and handing out a Christian tract that illustrated the link between Islam and the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.</div>
<div>The tract featured a picture of an American flag and beneath it the words, &quot;Remember 9/11: In the name of Allah they brought destruction and death to thousands. In the name of Jesus Christ you can have eternal life.&quot;</div>
<div>A Muslim cleric who saw what Yancey was handing out contacted the Antelope Valley Human Relations Task Force and filed a grievance. In his complaint, he accused Yancey of committing a hate crime by distributing 200 of the gospel tracts.</div>
<div>Attorney Karen Milam, senior counsel for the Southern California office of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://pacificjustice.org/">Pacific Justice Institute</a> (PJI), represented the pastor before the task force, arguing that the &quot;hate crime&quot; allegations were completely unfounded.</div>
<div>PJI president Brad Dacus says the case has now been resolved. &quot;The good news is that the charges were completely dropped, and a message was clearly [sent] that religious freedom in this country is still protected,&quot; he says.</div>
<div>The Antelope Valley Human Relations Task Force's legal counsel, Superior Court Judge Stella Owens Murrell, agreed with PJI that no hate crime had been committed, and the matter was dismissed. But Dacus says while he and PJI &quot;are pleased that freedom prevailed in this case,&quot; that organization and others must press forward to protect Christians' religious liberty and free speech rights.</div>
<div>PJI will continue to work hard to ensure that pastors like Audie Yancey are not muzzled by intolerance, Dacus insists. &quot;If we allow Islamic clerics to silence pastors and Christians in this country,&quot; he adds, &quot;then we have lost, without question, not only the war against terrorism but, even more importantly, the war against Christianity and religious freedom.&quot;</div>
</font></font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3336</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3336</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Political correctness run amok<br />
By Jeff Emanuel<br />
Monday, December 11, 2006<br />
</h3>
<div>Political correctness has long been running amok on the campuses of America's institutes of higher education. From the severe limiting of free speech to mandatory &ldquo;nondiscrimination&rdquo; policies which greatly limit freedom of association, basic rights and privileges have been increasingly denied to some students as a direct result of their (legal) refusal to compromise their principles and to embrace the multiculturalism and political correctness being forced down their throats.</div>
<div>A specific example of this &ndash; and of its fortunate conclusion, due to the decision of the students in question to take stand up for themselves, even though it meant legal action &ndash; recently took place at the University of Georgia.</div>
<div>This November, a Christian fraternity at the University of Georgia, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.uga.edu/byx/home.html">Beta Upsilon Chi</a> (BYX, which stands for &ldquo;Brothers Under Christ&rdquo;), was prevented from completing its required annual re-registration for student organization status &ndash; a necessary action to remain officially associated with UGA, and thus to remain eligible to use University facilities, to apply for funds, and to receive other such privileges &ndash; and was summarily removed from the roster of official student groups, as a result of its requirement that members and officers &ldquo;affirm [their] personal relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ.&rdquo;</div>
<div>The reason for this action was that their requirement of Christian faith violated a new nondiscrimination policy enacted by the Board of Regents statewide, and by the University locally, which requires that student organizations include in their constitution, and adhere to, the statement that &ldquo;Membership shall not be denied to any person because of age, race, sex, <strong>religion</strong>, handicap, sexual orientation, or national origin.&rdquo; </div>
<div>The fraternity&rsquo;s president attempted to correct this situation by explaining to Georgia&rsquo;s Assistant Director of Student Activities that, as a registered 501(c)(7) organization, BYX was exempt from the requirement not to discriminate on the basis of religion and gender.</div>
<div>When the University employee responded that the nondiscrimination policy requirement was still valid because student organizations fell under the jurisdiction of the educational code, rather than the tax code. However, in reality &ndash; as the BYX president attempted to point out &ndash; under the applicable portions of both the education and tax codes, the fraternity&rsquo;s requirements are not &ldquo;invidious discrimination,&rdquo; but rather &ldquo;federally recognized associational classifications.&rdquo; </div>
<div>Faced with an insurmountable obstruction to their re-registration as a student organization due to the administration&rsquo;s refusal to apply the appropriate requirements to the fraternity, there was little avenue left to them but to file suit against the University, and to seek a legal solution to their battle for equal rights on campus vis-&agrave;-vis student group association and exclusivity.</div>
<div>On Tuesday, December 5, a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/BYXcomplaint.pdf">lawsuit</a> was filed on behalf of both the UGA chapter and the national organization of BYX by the Alliance Defense Fund and the Center for Law and Religious Freedom, seeking an injunction against the University to allow the fraternity to re-register as an organization with its association requirements intact, and to be afforded the same rights and privileges as any other student group on campus.</div>
<div>Besides the tax and educational code exemptions which applied to the Christian fraternity, a main point in the case was that the University&rsquo;s nondiscrimination policy was inconsistently enforced, as evidenced by the cited example of UGA&rsquo;s Baha'i Student Association, which requires that a person be of the Baha'i faith to be an officer.</div>
<div>Within two days of the suit being filed, the University acquiesced to the students&rsquo; demands, in part blaming the ordeal on a misunderstanding by an employee, but also acknowledging that organizations like BYX can exist as chartered, and without the forced inclusion of a &ldquo;nondiscrimination&rdquo; policy which mandates the acceptance of people who stand in opposition to the purpose of the organization itself.</div>
<div>As the BYX statement of purpose is &ldquo;To establish brotherhood and unity among college men based on the common bond of Jesus Christ,&rdquo; it only makes sense that there would be a requirement that all of its members be Christian.</div>
<div>The success achieved here goes beyond the granting of permission to BYX to immediately reform and begin once again to receive the benefits afforded to all official student organizations. The larger victory comes from the fact that the University has now agreed to reevaluate, and to revise, its nondiscrimination policy.</div>
<div>The University of Georgia&rsquo;s Department of Legal Affairs sent a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/UGAletter.pdf">letter</a> the Center for Law and Religious Freedom on Thursday the 8<sup>th</sup>, informing them that BYX:</div>
<blockquote dir="ltr">
<div>&hellip;will have all the rights and responsibilities of a registered student organization except that they will be exempt from the provisions of the University's Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy relating to membership in the organization based upon religion.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>The letter also acknowledged that the University would soon begin &ldquo;reviewing its student organization policies,&rdquo; and advised that the concerns raised in this case would &ldquo;be thoroughly considered.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Unfortunately, though he agreed to the terms of the suit, University of Georgia President Michael Adams couldn&rsquo;t keep himself from lashing out at the fly-in-the-PC-ointment Christian fraternity. At a news conference Thursday morning, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2006/12/08/1208metfrat.html">he said</a>:</div>
<blockquote dir="ltr">
<div>I'm going to put my Christian hat on for a moment &mdash; I think there are ways that Christian people are supposed to be able to solve problems without litigation&hellip;Let's see if we can find enough common ground to both ensure no one's religious rights are abridged and secondly that the university ensures that people are not being discriminated against.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Adams&rsquo;s statement was, of course, a completely unnecessary slap in the face of a group of students who wanted nothing more than to continue with their activities &ndash; all of which fell squarely within the bounds of University policy and federal law &ndash; in the same way that they had since their chapter&rsquo;s inception nearly two years ago, and who, when faced with obstacle after insurmountable obstacle to their legally doing so, took the only recourse left to them.</div>
<div>As David French, Director of the ADF&rsquo;s Center for Academic Freedom, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://phibetacons.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YTE4MDY1OTU4YjViYTNjMzQ4MzJlOWQ0NWQ2MDE4NzE=">observed</a>: </div>
<blockquote dir="ltr">
<div>While this all sounds so reasonable, it plays into a common guilt trip repeatedly inflicted on religious students. Aren&rsquo;t religious students supposed to be nice? Aren&rsquo;t they supposed to get along with everyone? How does litigation advance the Christian witness? By asking questions like this, universities deflect attention from their own failings and ignore the bureaucratic black hole that sucks in the vast majority of all student complaints.</div>
<div>[&hellip;]</div>
<div>The fact that students appeal to the courts &mdash; as is their right and as the Apostle Paul did when faced with illegal persecution &mdash; is evidence of their courage and conviction, not of any spiritual or moral defect. </div>
</blockquote>
<div>Having a nondiscrimination policy makes sense in some cases, but in the instance of an organization based around some ideal, ideology, or religion &ndash; such as a Christian group, an all-male fraternity, an all-female sorority, or a conservative or liberal organization, for example &ndash; it is completely illogical to forbid that adherence to the ideal, ideology, or religion around which that group is based be required for membership or officership.</div>
<div>The Atlanta Journal-Constitution either managed to miss, or attempted to obfuscate, the entire point of this case with its Friday article on the suit&rsquo;s outcome. Said the paper:</div>
<blockquote dir="ltr">
<div>UGA officials said they have not finalized plans for a policy change. At the heart, a main issue is how to amend the policy without opening it too far. The chess club, or a social fraternity for example, would not be allowed to exclude Muslim students or Christians based on their faith.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>The issue at hand has never been whether religious, racial, or even sexual discrimination was a factor in the ability of students to associate, or to take part in activities. Whether a person is Christian or Muslim, black or white, male or female has nothing to do with his or her interest in many activities or organizations. However, when a group is organized around a common interest or trait &ndash; such as a religious organization, or a fraternity or sorority &ndash; then discrimination based on that interest or trait is &ndash; and must be &ndash; permitted, for, if it is not, then common interest groups cannot exist.</div>
<div>Though it took legal coercing, in this the University of Georgia corrected a wrong and made the right decision. Next, though, the school must follow through on its promise to &ldquo;review and change&rdquo; its nondiscrimination policy. As Timothy Tracey of the Christian Legal Society said Thursday, &ldquo;We need a long-term solution and just saying, 'You, Beta Upsilon Chi, will be recognized,' isn't good enough. We need a policy change.&rdquo;</div>
<div>A policy change is indeed necessary. A blanket, one-size-fits-all program to provide a politically correct end to all discrimination cannot be enacted without inadvertently discriminating against some of those whom it was designed to protect. Enacting a policy which forbids an organization based around a common defining characteristic to acknowledge that characteristic when determining its membership is a proposition which is as foolhardy as it is unworkable.</div>
<br />
<br />
<em>
<div><font size="2"><em>Jeff Emanuel, a Special Operations military veteran, studies Classics at the University of Georgia. He is also a contributing editor for conservative web log <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.redstate.com/">RedState.com</a>, and is a columnist for the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onlineathens.com/staff/emanueljeff.shtml">Athens, GA Banner-Herald</a>. </em></font>
<div><font size="2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.townhall.com/Secure/Signup.aspx">Sign up today</a> and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.townhall.com/Secure/Signup.aspx">Sign up today!</a></font> </div>
</div>
</em><br />
<br />
Copyright &copy; 2006 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved. <br />]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3335</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3335</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">
<div>Town Blocks Porn, ACLU Attacks</div>
</font></strong></div>
<div>by Josh Montez</div>
<div><em>The ACLU is threatening the Village of South Holland, Illinois, because the town won&rsquo;t allow &lsquo;Comcast on Demand&rsquo; inside its borders.</em>
<div>
<div>South Holland&rsquo;s franchise agreement with Comcast prohibits &lsquo;On Demand.&rsquo; Comcast spokesperson Angelynne Amores says they won&rsquo;t fight the requirement. </div>
<div>&ldquo;In order for us to provide services in any municipality, we have to adhere to the agreement. So, Comcast is in complete compliance with the terms of the franchise agreement with South Holland.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Every town has a franchise agreement with a cable company. South Holland administrator, J. Wynsma, says blocking porn channels fits his town&rsquo;s long-established community standard. After all, the village&rsquo;s motto is &lsquo;Faith, Family and Future.&rsquo; </div>
<div>&ldquo;As a community, we&rsquo;ve continually supported these values and this is long-established by the courts as a proper and a fitting role of the municipality.&rdquo;</div>
<div>But that&rsquo;s not good enough for the ACLU. They contend South Holland&rsquo;s franchise agreement is a form of censorship. Pat Trueman of the Alliance Defense Fund disagrees. </div>
<div>&ldquo;This is something that a city has every right to do since the cable operator wants to use the city property to string his cable. Restrictions are always appropriate. And the city cannot be forced to become an X-rated programming participant, even if the ACLU tries to take them to court and sue them.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Trueman applauds South Holland&rsquo;s stand and says if the porn industry is to ever be reigned in, the federal government needs to investigate companies like Comcast for broadcasting illegal and obscene material. </div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3334</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3334</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Demographer Warns United Nations About Abortion War on Baby Girls</strong>
<div><strong>by Samantha Singson</strong><em><br />
</em>December 11, 2006<br />
</div>
<div><em>LifeNews.com Note: Samantha Singson writes for the Catholic Family &amp; Human Rights Institute in their Friday Fax publication.</em>
<div>At the UN this week, renowned scholar Dr. Nicholas Eberstadt of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) warned delegates of the growing global gender imbalance due to prenatal sex selection and sex selected abortions. Calling the trend a &ldquo;Global War Against Baby Girls&rdquo;, Eberstadt delivered extensive statistics on the rise of &ldquo;son preference&rdquo; in every part of the world. </div>
<div>Refuting the assumptions that preference for baby boys is a localized cultural phenomenon or due solely to coercive population programs, Eberstadt&rsquo;s research reveals that imbalance is due to several factors: an existing preference for sons, a decrease in overall fertility, and the exponential increase in the use of technology which facilitates sex selection in the prenatal stages. He also emphasized that a rise in education levels does not slow the problem and in some cases is associated with increases in aborting baby girls.</div>
<div>According to Eberstadt, natural birth rates are about 105 males for every 100 females born. Some regions of the world are experiencing upwards of 115 boys born for every 100 girls, some are as high at 150 boys born for every 100 girls. He warned delegates that this could just be the beginning and that the world is &ldquo;moving to the realm of science fiction&rdquo; as the ratio of baby boys to baby girls was already at levels &ldquo;beyond nature.&rdquo; </div>
<div>Citing a recent study, Eberstadt said that even now there are 20 million &ldquo;missing&rdquo; baby girls in Asia alone, that sex-selected abortions have permanently skewed the demographic balance of China and are in the process of skewing the demographic balance of India. He also showed the way that the trend has crept into Eastern Europe and Latin America, and that almost every African state is showing signs of vulnerability to the phenomenon.</div>
<div>Since 1994, the UN has recognized that &ldquo;son preference&rdquo; is discriminatory to women and girls and the Beijing Platform for Action lists female infanticide and prenatal sex selection as incidences of violence against women.</div>
<div>The recent Violence Against Children (VAC) study released earlier this year made no mention of the problem of sex-selected abortions whereby parents are forced or coerced to choose one or two children and almost inevitably choose to abort unborn girls. The 139-page in-depth Violence Against Women (VAW) study also released this year only referred to prenatal sex selection three times. </div>
<div>A delegate who attended the lecture told the Friday Fax, &ldquo;This is astonishing. The research clearly shows that this is a growing problem all over the world. It is our job as delegates to seek solutions.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Experts say solutions will be hard to come by. </div>
<div>Eberstadt pointed out that when South Korea made sex selected abortions illegal, the practice sky-rocketed. It is likely the only cure will be a curb on all abortions. Experts also point out that a rising imbalance of boys to girls will lead to trafficking in women and could contribute to an increasing national security concerns.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Printed from: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/int133.html">http://www.lifenews.com/int133.html</a></em><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3333</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3333</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">Baker Report Asks Israel to Give Up Land 'Vital To Survivability'<br />
</font></strong><font size="3">By Julie Stahl<br />
CNSNews.com Jerusalem Bureau Chief<br />
December 07, 2006<br />
<br />
<strong>Jerusalem (CNSNews.com)</strong> - In exchange for Syrian help in calming the situation in Iraq, the Iraq Study Group is asking Israel to give up land &quot;vital to its survivability,&quot; a senior Israeli lawmaker said Thursday.<br />
<br />
Much of the bipartisan panel's report released on Wednesday dealt with the situation in Iraq, but it also said the U.S. could only achieve its Middle East aims if it dealt directly with the Arab-Israeli conflict - a proposition that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and experts here rejected.<br />
<br />
The recommendations also call for the involvement of Iran and Syria - both considered terror-sponsoring states by the U.S. government - in attempts to calm the situation in Iraq.<br />
<br />
The panel, co-chaired by former Secretary of State James Baker and former U.S. Congressman Lee Hamilton, says Israel, Syria and Lebanon should hold &quot;unconditional&quot; peace talks.<br />
<br />
Syria must stop trying to undermine the Lebanese government (Syria has never recognized Lebanon's sovereignty), cooperate with investigations into Lebanese political assassinations blamed on Syria, stop helping terrorist groups in Lebanon and the Palestinian areas, and seal its border with Iraq.<br />
<br />
&quot;In exchange for these actions and in the context of a full and secure peace agreement, the Israelis should return the Golan Heights, with a U.S. security guarantee,&quot; which could include an international force on the strategic plateau, the report says.<br />
<br />
Yuval Steinitz, a Likud lawmaker who serves on the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, said that he expected the U.S. would not &quot;dictate the end result of future negotiations&quot; ahead of time.<br />
<br />
&quot;The Golan Heights is extremely vital to Israel's survivability in the long term,&quot; he told <strong>Cybercast News Service</strong>.<br />
<br />
Before Israel captured the plateau during the 1967 Six-Day War, the Syrians used the Heights overlooking the Sea of Galilee to fire at Israeli communities in the plain below.<br />
<br />
Israel has been involved in negotiations with Syria on and off for years, but without resolution.<br />
<br />
In 2000, President Clinton briefly tried to broker a deal between Israel and then Syrian President Hafez Assad. Talks broke down over the extent of the land to be returned to Syria.<br />
<br />
While the country is divided over what to do about most of the territory controlled by Israel and claimed by the Arabs, there is broad consensus among Israelis that the Golan Heights, which Israel annexed in 1981, should not be surrendered.<br />
<br />
Steinitz questioned why Israel should be expected to make concessions and be generous to Syria given the fact it had supplied the Hizballah terrorist organization with thousands of rockets launched from Lebanon at northern Israeli cities and towns over the summer.<br />
<br />
He also accused Syria of trying to topple Lebanon's democratic government and noted that senior Syrian officials have been implicated in the killing of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and suspected of involvement in other assassinations.<br />
<br />
Despite the difficulties facing the U.S. in Iraq, Steinitz said he expected that Washington would support Israel and Lebanon - &quot;the good guys&quot; who support democracy - against Hizballah and Syria - the &quot;bad guys&quot; who are terrorists and their supporters.<br />
<br />
Dore Gold, a former ambassador to the United Nations, said there was &quot;an inherent structural problem in the Baker report with respect to both Iran and Syria.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;Since 2003, both these countries have been the primary Middle Eastern actors responsible for increasing instability inside Iraq and making it difficult for the U.S. and its coalition partners to realize their military aims,&quot; Gold said in an interview.<br />
<br />
&quot;To get these two countries to now cooperate with the United States after all these years and assume a responsible role in limiting the chaos in Iraq involves getting them to shift their policies 180 degrees,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
Gold said because the report called for the U.S. to approach Iran and Syria and indicated that there would not be a victory in Iraq, the two regimes would see America as a country that is trying to manage its defeat.<br />
<br />
&quot;Therefore the price they will demand of the United States for cooperation will be extremely high ...&quot; Gold said.<br />
<br />
He said Iran would likely only agree to help the U.S. withdraw in return for U.S. acceptance of a nuclear-capable Iran - &quot;a disaster not just for Israel but for Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and every pro-Western government in the Middle East.&quot;<br />
<br />
A senior Israeli government official who spoke on condition of anonymity said the ISG's interests were confined to getting the president out of trouble in Iraq rather than looking at the broader picture of what lies behind the problems in the Middle East.<br />
<br />
The report sought ways to &quot;placate&quot; Iran and Syria, and Israel was concerned this would happen at its expense.<br />
<br />
If the U.S. believed Iran would help, it was &quot;very much mistaken,&quot; he said.<br />
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3332</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3332</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Evolution Gaps: Louisiana Schools Attack</strong></div>
<div><em>December 09, 2006 01:00 PM EST</em></div>
<br clear="all" />
<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5" width="310" align="right" border="0">
    <tbody>
    </tbody>
</table>
<div>
<div> </div>
Charles Darwin&rsquo;s evolutionary theory is just that &mdash; theory &mdash; laden with numerous holes. It is treated as divine revelation by liberals. It&rsquo;s not.
<div>Therefore, the Louisiana Quachita Parish School Board is reasonable when legitimating policy allowing public school instructors to disclose the faults in Darwin&rsquo;s evolutionary theory. </div>
<div>The liberal bias for evolution is nothing other than cultic mindset. Therefore, teachers in that Louisiana environs are genuinely furthering educational excellence when cutting through the liberal bias.</div>
<div>According to CitizenLink per Focus on the Family, &quot;Louisiana's Quachita Parish School Board passed a resolution to give legal protection to teachers who teach about the controversies surrounding Darwin's theory of evolution.</div>
<div>&quot;The resolution, called the Teacher Academic Freedom to Teach Scientific Evidence Regarding Controversial Scientific Subjects, states that &lsquo;teachers shall be permitted to help students understand, analyze, critique and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and weaknesses of existing scientific theories pertinent to the course being taught.&rsquo;</div>
<div>&quot;The policy was adopted after teachers asked for clarification of their rights.&quot;</div>
<div>Teachers throughout America should get on track regarding clarification of their teaching rights. The liberal bias has been baptized as legitimate when it is not. It is prejudicial and therefore dues not enhance unbiased education in public schools.</div>
<div>&quot;Casey Luskin, education policy specialist with the Discovery Institute Center for Science and Culture, said the teachers were wise to ask for a written policy. &quot;&rsquo;There is a disturbing trend of teachers, students and scientists coming under attack for questioning evolution,&rsquo; he said. &lsquo;Free speech and academic freedom are cherished principles in America and too important to be sacrificed to the intolerant demands of extremists on any issue.&rsquo;</div>
<div>&quot;The school district, Luskin said, should be praised for taking a stand and protecting teachers and students who discuss scientific issues in the classroom.</div>
<div>&quot;&rsquo;Teachers are the real winners in this case,&rsquo; he said, &lsquo;because they now have clear protection to help students analyze all aspects of controversial scientific issues without worrying whether or not they will be fired or censored by their school district.&rsquo;&quot;</div>
<div>Even biblical students have been swayed by the liberal bias, particularly on church-related campuses. Evangelicals have been pulled into the liberal prejudice because of wanting to appear state-of-the-art informed. They fear being labeled provincial; therefore, they try to bend the logic to permit some sort of accommodation in favor of evolution.</div>
<div>There is absolutely no need to bend the logic. The logic is that Darwin&rsquo;s worn theory is so utterly inadequate that it should never be taught anywhere. Yet those who do not believe in the God of the Bible, particularly not wanting to adhere to the morality of the Bible, praise the Darwinian evolution theory as &quot;fact,&quot; the latter printed in public school textbooks.</div>
<div>Instead of the Darwin proposition treated as just another theory, it is enthroned as proven, fact, without doubt, in cement. That is how blinded the closed minded have become. Yet all the while they label themselves broadminded and at the front of the educational process.</div>
<div>There can be no let up when it comes to fighting this liberal position to the last public classroom.</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3331</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3331</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="6">'Tis not the season at Sea-Tac Airport</font></strong></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><strong><font size="4">By <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.komotv.com/news/mailto:AprilZ@komotv.com">April Zepeda</a></font></strong></div>
<div><a rel="nofollow"></a></div>
<div>There will be no more Christmas trees at Sea-Tac Airport this season after the Port of Seattle received at least one complaint about them.<br />
<br />
For more than 25 years, the airport has celebrated the holidays with Christmas trees over its entrances. But overnight, the Port of Seattle ordered all 15 trees removed.<br />
<br />
&quot;I think it's very unfortunate. Why lose the Christmas spirit? Christmas is for kids,&quot; said passenger Lisa Jones.<br />
<br />
The Port allowed &quot;holiday&quot; decorations to remain but decided to take down all the Christmas trees after a Jewish religious leader complained they were offensive.<br />
<br />
&quot;It's a Christmas tree! It's not like they were displaying crucifixes or menorahs or anything religious, but Christmas trees that have been around here for years,&quot; said an employee who asked not to be identified.<br />
<br />
The Port of Seattle says it had little choice. It says a Seattle rabbi with the Central Organization for Jewish Learning hired an attorney and threatened to sue if the airport did not erect an eight-foot menorah to balance the message of the Christmas trees.<br />
<br />
According to an airport spokeswoman, the two sides could not reach an agreement before the lawsuit was to be filed, so the trees were removed instead.<br />
<br />
Angry airport employees have started a campaign urging people to call the Port of Seattle to complain.<br />
<br />
The Christmas trees are now in storage or hidden in unused areas of the airport where they won't be seen.<br />
<br />
The airline companies, which lease space in the airport, are not being required to remove decorations from their check-in counters.<br />
<br />
Rachel Garson with the Port of Seattle said they would revisit the issue of Christmas trees after the holidays are over.<br />
<br />
&quot;Since this is the busiest time of year we decided to take the decorations down now and consider a new policy after the new year.&quot; said Garson.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3330</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3330</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Expelling God from the academy<br />
By Mark M. Alexander<br />
Friday, December 8, 2006<br />
</h3>
<div>In the Gospel of Matthew (19:24), Jesus speaks to his disciples about wealth: &quot;[I]t is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.&quot;
<div>The Christian life, at its foundation, is characterized by humility, which is to say that wealth, which fosters elitism, is often at odds with Christianity. The Bible does not say that prosperity is sinful, but those who place wealth above God are engaging in idolatry -- as defined in the Second of the Ten Commandments.
<div>One may rightly infer that a wealth of knowledge leading to academic elitism, like economic elitism, is also hostile to Christianity. Idolizing knowledge or wealth isolates one from the Truth and Light.
<div>While the federal judiciary erroneously cites the so-called &quot;Living Constitution&quot; to justify the eradication of God from the public square, it is wealthy university trustees and academic elitists who, under the aegis of &quot;tolerance and diversity,&quot; seek to eradicate God from the academy.
<div>How is it that historic institutions such as Harvard, Yale and Princeton have all but forsaken their Christian foundations -- particularly in the last few decades? The answer is that, commensurate with the growth of their economic and academic stores, they rely on ever-wealthier trustees and enrollment prospects. (The average tuition among these institutions is now $42,000 -- and that's before room and board.)
<div>This is certainly not to say that our nation is devoid of wealthy and intelligent Christians, or that being of modest means insures one from materialist idolatry. Idolatry is not, after all, what you own, but what owns you. This is to say, however, that the potential for idolatry increases exponentially with growth in economic and academic elitism. Consequently, left-elite academicians, and their cadre of wealthy &quot;Rockefeller conservatives&quot; (economic conservatives/social liberals), who comprise majorities on most academic boards, harbor contempt for Christianity in academia.
<div>The nation's oldest academic institution, Harvard University, was established in 1636 and named for Puritan minister John Harvard. The university claims that it was &quot;never formally affiliated with a specific religious denomination,&quot; though all its presidents were Puritan ministers until 1708. A 1643 college brochure identified Harvard's purpose: &quot;To advance Learning and perpetuate it to Posterity; dreading to leave an illiterate Ministry to the Churches.&quot; The university's Charter of 1650 calls for &quot;the education of the English and Indian youth of this Country in knowledge and godliness.&quot; (Harvard now has amassed a $30-billion endowment.)
<div>Harvard alumnus, John Adams (class of 1755) wrote in 1776, &quot;It is the duty of all men in society, publicly, and at stated seasons, to worship the SUPREME BEING, the great Creator and Preserver of the universe.&quot;
<div>Yale, the nation's third oldest academic institution, was established in 1701 by royal charter as The Collegiate School, in response to the efforts of colonial Congregationalist ministers since the 1640s to establish a college in New Haven. The charter was granted for an institution &quot;wherein Youth may be instructed in the Arts and Sciences [and] through the blessing of Almighty God may be fitted for Publick employment both in Church and Civil State.&quot; (Yale now boasts a $12-billion endowment.)
<div>Yale alumnus Noah Webster (class of 1778), a devout Christian and outspoken Federalist, considered &quot;education useless without the Bible.&quot; In the forward of the 1828 Webster's American Dictionary, he wrote, &quot;In my view, the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children, under a free government ought to be instructed.... No truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.&quot;
<div>Princeton was originally founded in 1746 as the College of New Jersey, established by royal charter for &quot;the Education of Youth in the Learned Languages and in the Liberal Arts and Sciences,&quot; and unique in that the charter allowed the attendance of &quot;any Person of any religious Denomination whatsoever.&quot; The absence of an official denominational affiliation or criteria for attendance did not, however, connote the absence of strong denominational ties. To the contrary, Princeton was founded by &quot;New Light&quot; Presbyterians of the Great Awakening for the purpose of training Presbyterian ministers. Jonathan Dickinson, a Presbyterian minister and leader of the Great Awakening of the 1730s, was the school's co-founder and first president. (Princeton has a $13-billion endowment.)
<div>Princeton alumnus James Madison (class of 1771) observed, &quot;The belief in a God All Powerful wise and good, is so essential to the moral order of the world and to the happiness of man, that arguments which enforce it cannot be drawn from too many sources nor adapted with too much solicitude to the different characters and capacities impressed with it.&quot;
<div>Yet today, these institutions, like the rest of the Ivy League schools -- Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth and Penn -- and upper-tier institutions across the nation under the tutelage of wealthy trustees and elite academicians &ndash;- tend to eschew all things Christian.
<div>The latest chapter of Christian heritage eradication in academia is being written at the nation's second oldest university, William and Mary, chartered in 1693 in Williamsburg, Virginia, as an Anglican college.
<div>At the behest of university president Gene Nichol, the removal of the historic Wren Chapel altar cross has been ordered &quot;in order to make it less of a faith-specific space, and to make it more welcoming to students, faculty, staff, and visitors of all faiths.&quot; The Wren Chapel was constructed in 1732 as &quot;a faith-specific space,&quot; and the cross was a gift from nearby Bruton Parish Church, founded in 1674. Bruton is the oldest continually operated Episcopal Church in America. George Washington, Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson worshipped there prior to the Revolution.
<div>Nichol wrote, &quot;Our Chapel, like our entire campus, must be welcoming to all. I believe a recognition of the full dignity of each member of our diverse community is vital. Though we haven't meant to do so, the display of a Christian cross ... sends an unmistakable message that the chapel belongs more fully to some of us than to others. ... The Wren is no mere museum or artifact. It touches every student who enrolls at the college. It defines us. And it must define us all.&quot;
<div>Of course, removal of the Wren cross does not &quot;define&quot; William and Mary. To the contrary, it redefines William and Mary. Perhaps Mr. Nichol (and his colleagues in similar posts across the nation) should size up the eye of a needle before exiling the last vestiges of Christianity from their hallowed halls.
<div>A William and Mary graduate once mused, &quot;Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep forever.&quot; The name of that esteemed alumnus? Thomas Jefferson. <br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3329</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3329</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="ContentViewer1_spnTitle">
<div><strong><font size="6">Atheist group forces Detroit to renege on promise to reimburse church; ADF files motion to intervene</font></strong></div>
<em>American Atheists tries to bully city to deny promised funds to inner-city church </em><br />
DETROIT &mdash; Alliance Defense Fund attorneys filed a motion Monday in federal court to intervene on behalf of an inner-city Detroit church hung out to dry due to the actions of the American Atheists. <br />
<br />
The city had asked the church and other downtown establishments to alter the appearance of their properties to improve the city&rsquo;s image for the upcoming Super Bowl in exchange for being reimbursed for half the expense.  But because the atheist group has now sued the city, the city has been forced to withhold reimbursement from the church, even though the church has already secured a loan for and completed the requested improvements. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;A small band of radicals should not blackmail a city into reneging on a contract that it had every intention of honoring,&rdquo; said ADF Senior Counsel Kevin Theriot.  &ldquo;This church was simply being a good neighbor by complying with the city&rsquo;s desire to present the best possible image to Super Bowl visitors.  Just because a radical group doesn&rsquo;t like the church, they cannot demand that the city put the brakes on the funds the city promised.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
In January, St. John&rsquo;s Episcopal Church entered into a contract with the City of Detroit Development Authority to &ldquo;enhance the visual appearance of street facing building facades and parking lot edges, prevent blight, attract businesses, and complement infrastructure.&rdquo;  The contract provided that the DDA would reimburse the church for 50 percent of the expenditures--up to $180,000--for the improvements. <br />
<br />
After the church borrowed $180,000 to complete the improvements, they submitted the documents required for payment to the DDA, which, under the terms of the contract, was to reimburse the church within 30 days.  American Atheists filed a lawsuit against the city, alleging that the city violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution by entering into the contract with the church. <br />
<br />
Because of the lawsuit, the DDA, which had every intention of reimbursing the church, was forced to tell the church that it could not presently honor its contract and that it would have to revisit reimbursing the church pursuant to the contract after the lawsuit is resolved.  In the meantime, the American Atheists lawsuit has forced the church to continue making payments on the funds it borrowed in order to comply with the DDA&rsquo;s request, with no idea of when or if they will receive the promised reimbursement. <br />
<br />
A copy of the motion to intervene filed by ADF attorneys representing the church in <em>American Atheists v. City of Detroit</em> in the Southern Division of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan can be read at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/WalkerMotion.pdf">www.telladf.org/UserDocs/WalkerMotion.pdf</a>.   In addition, a copy of the statement filed by the Steven J. Kelly, rector of St. John&rsquo;s Episcopal Church, is available at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/KellyDeclaration.pdf">www.telladf.org/UserDocs/KellyDeclaration.pdf</a>. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s our hope that the court will see this lawsuit for what it truly is.  This radical group doesn&rsquo;t care if it financially cripples inner-city churches that honestly care for their surrounding communities,&rdquo; said Theriot.  &ldquo;The city&rsquo;s agreement to reimburse the church for the improvements it requested is no more an endorsement of religion than reimbursing a deli for improvements is an endorsement of eating meat.  The church&rsquo;s interests deserve to be defended in this lawsuit, and we are willing to assist the city as they stand up to this legal intimidation.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
ADF is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. <br />
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3328</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3328</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Watch!&rdquo; Learning from Advent</strong></div>
<div><strong></strong>In America, Halloween costumes are hardly put away before Christmas decorations start appearing in stores.  Christmas songs begin playing on the radio in November.  Halls are decked with boughs of holly shortly after Thanksgiving.  Then, on December 26, it all goes away.  Decorations are stored, carols are forgotten, and Christmas trees are tossed to the curb.  Abruptly, Christmas is over.</div>
<div>The Christian calendar was constructed rather differently than this.  The weeks leading up to Christmas were not commercial, they were spiritual.  This time of year was called Advent, which is derived from the Latin word for &quot;coming.&quot;  Christians throughout the centuries spent the Advent weeks piously and eagerly anticipating the arrival, not of Santa Claus, but of Jesus himself.   In this time of preparation, Christians remember two events: the Nativity, where Christ first came to us, and the Second Coming, that time when he will come again.  Advent was a quiet time of reflection, but on Christmas day the joyous celebration began, and it carried through all twelve days of Christmas, ending on the feast of the Epiphany. </div>
<div>In the hustle and bustle of &quot;Holiday&quot;, the new Christmas season that was created by department stores, there is hardly a spare moment for quiet reflection and eager anticipation.  That's a shame because the effect has been that we forget: Christ is coming!  &quot;No one knows about that day or hour...&quot; Scripture says. (Mark 13:32)</div>
<div>Christ taught the following parable: </div>
<div><blockquote>&quot;Be on guard! Be alert! You do not know when that time will come. It's like a man going away: He leaves his house and puts his servants in charge, each with his assigned task, and tells the one at the door to keep watch.  Therefore keep watch because you do not know when the owner of the house will come back&mdash;whether in the evening, or at midnight, or when the rooster crows, or at dawn. If he comes suddenly, do not let him find you sleeping. What I say to you, I say to everyone: &lsquo;Watch!'&quot; (Mark 13:33-37) </blockquote></div>
<div>Advent, then, is that time of year when we prepare ourselves for Christ by remembering the first coming and preparing for the second.</div>
<div>These are very pious thoughts, a cynic may say, but what does it have to do with public policy?  After all, if we await Christ's return, if we truly expect that he may come any day, why worry about justice and peace on Earth?  Shouldn't we simply wait for Christ the King, who will make all things right?</div>
<div>Unfortunately, this has become a prevalent mentality among some Christians of the <em>Left Behind</em> generation, but it is misguided.  Look again, for example, at the parable Jesus gave.  Before he left, Christ gave us assigned tasks.  Feed the hungry, he said.  Give drink to the thirsty.  Give shelter to the stranger.  Clothing to the naked.  Care to the sick.  Company to the imprisoned. (Matthew 25:34-36)  We have received our tasks; what if Christ returns and all is in shambles?  What if we have fallen asleep without feeding or sheltering or visiting?  What if we neglect the tasks we have been given?</div>
<div>Society at large, not just individual Christians, would do well to ask itself the same questions.  God speaks to society, not just individuals.  Addressing the people of Judah through the prophet Zechariah, the Lord declared, &quot;Administer true justice; show mercy and compassion to one another.  Do not oppress the widow or the fatherless, the alien or the poor. In your hearts do not think evil of each other.&quot; (Zechariah 9:8) Similarly, God condemned the rulers of Judah, saying, &quot;Your rulers are rebels, companions of thieves; they all love bribes and chase after gifts.  They do not defend the cause of the fatherless; the widow's case does not come before them.&quot; (Isaiah 1:23)  Over and over again, God commands rulers and their people to seek justice and peace.</div>
<div>In modern America, everyone has the opportunity to participate in a democratic government and all of us participate in the formation of culture.  We all have a role to play in helping those who are the least fortunate.  The fact that Christ will come again is no excuse for abandoning political engagement or cultural involvement.  To the contrary!  It gives us every reason to redouble our efforts, so that when Christ appears we will be found faithfully carrying out the tasks that he has assigned to us.  Christ's impending return should not give rise to a spirit of fatalism; it is not an excuse for withdrawal or retreat from cultural engagement.  Rather, it should offer added motivation to eagerly carry out our assigned tasks.</div>
<div>Carl F. H. Henry expressed this point beautifully when he said, &quot;Not until God brings down the curtain on history do we have the prerogative of abandoning it to final destruction and doom.&quot;  There is always something we can do to further the cause of justice in our society.  There are innumerable ways in which we can show our love for Christ by reaching out to the poor, oppressed and downtrodden.</div>
<div>Therefore, this Christmas season, let us not forget Advent.  Advent is the perfect time to take stock of our lives, checking to see whether we are carrying out the tasks that Christ has given us, or whether we have fallen asleep.  Again and again we must remind ourselves: &quot;Be on guard! Be alert! You do not know when that time will come.&quot;</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3327</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3327</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font color="#440000" size="2">FAITH UNDER FIRE<br />
</font></strong><font color="#000000" size="+2">Teen saved from forced conversion to Islam</font><br />
<font color="#000000" size="+1">Persecuted Christian given new opportunity by U.S. ministry</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>The intervention by a Christian ministry that focuses on persecuted Christians worldwide has saved a teenage girl in Pakistan from what probably would have been a forced conversion to Islam and mandatory marriage to a Muslim master, according to reports on the recent situation.
<div>
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.persecution.com">The Voice of the Martyrs</a> confirmed in a new report that the teen, Azra Bibi, soon will be established in her own home through the assistance of a Christian pastor in the region, and the donations of Christians in the United States.
<div>Such situations, VOM confirms, happen all too frequently. As Christians in a Muslim nation, the family was subjected to the ongoing persecution of the community. In the case of Azra, she and her mother were working in a brick kiln, under almost slave-like conditions, in order to earn enough for the family to eat.
<div>She'd been working at the kilns since she was seven, and frequently endured the jeers and criticisms of Muslims working at the same plant, officials said.
<div>Then one day, the verbal attacks that began with the work day increased, and several Muslim women turned violent, beating Azra's mother, officials said.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;They were both taken to the brick kiln owner, where Azra's mom was murdered in the most horrific way,&quot; the report said, leaving the teen not only reeling from the loss of her mother, but now facing the responsibilities for her debts.
<div>&quot;The brick kiln owner had plans to force Azra to convert to Islam with the intention of marrying her off. But God had other plans,&quot; the VOM report said. &quot;With the help of a courageous local pastor and support from Christians in the U.S., Azra was miraculously rescued with her debts paid.&quot;
<div>VOM said plans now are under way to provide training and a place to live &quot;for this courageous young Christian girl who stood firm in her faith through such difficult trials.&quot;
<div>&quot;You can learn about and help persecuted Christians like Azra,&quot; the organization said. &quot;We cannot let them suffer in silence.&quot;
<div>VOM is a non-profit, interdenominational ministry working worldwide to help Christians who are persecuted for their faith, and to educate the world about that persecution. Its headquarters are in Bartlesville, Okla., and it has 30 affiliated international offices.
<div>It was launched by the late Richard and Sabina Wurmbrand, who started smuggling Russian Gospels into Russia in 1947, just months before Richard was abducted and imprisoned in Romania where he was tortured for his refusal to recant Christianity.
<div>He eventually was released in 1964 and the next year he testified about the persecution of Christians before the U.S. Senate's Internal Security Subcommittee, stripping to the waist to show the deep torture wound scars on his body.
<div>The group that later was renamed The Voice of the Martyrs was organized in 1967, when his book, &quot;Tortured for Christ,&quot; was released. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3326</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3326</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">PTC Applauds NBC's Airing of <em>VeggieTales</em>, Religious Content Intact<br />
</font></strong><font size="+0"><font size="1">
<div>By Jenni Parker<br />
December 6, 2006</div>
<font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - A pro-family media watchdog group is commending NBC for its apparent decision to put God and the Bible back into the network's Saturday morning television broadcasts of the popular animated series <em>VeggieTales</em>.</div>
<div>Some critics in the Christian community had denounced NBC for its initial insistence on editing out references to God and the Bible in the scripture-based cartoons before airing them. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/9/152006a.asp">See earlier article</a>) However, <em>VeggieTales </em>creator Phil Vischer recently reported <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.philvischer.com/">on his website</a> that the last few episodes of the animated show have not been edited by the network.</div>
<div>Vischer says most of the last four or five <em>VeggieTales </em>episodes have had &quot;at least as much 'theistic' content as the earlier ones, if not more.&quot; Nevertheless, the shows &quot;came back from NBC standards and practices department with no requested edits,&quot; he says. &quot;So they're going to air just the way they were originally written.&quot;</div>
<div>Musing over what brought about the network's seeming change of heart, the animator observes, &quot;Rumor has it NBC received in the neighborhood of 600,000 e-mails about the Veggie Tales edits (a rumor I can't confirm or deny).&quot; In any event, he says, &quot;It's worth a little celebration ... don't you think?&quot;</div>
<div>And, as for any viewers who may have stopped watching their &quot;veggies&quot; in protest over the edits, Vischer points out, their actions may well have helped to bring &quot;a little more light to TV's 'vast wasteland.'&quot; He urges fans of the cartoon to let NBC know they are thrilled with the network's recent choices by tuning in to watch the show.</div>
<div>In response to the animator's report, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://parentstv.org/">Parents Television Council</a> (PTC) president L. Brent Bozell said his organization applauds NBC for apparently reversing its decision to cut the biblical and theistic content from the cartoon. He also commented that it is important for the entertainment industry to realize that &quot;Americans are more willing to watch programming that reflects their values, with <em>VeggieTales </em>being one of those examples.&quot;</div>
<div>Bozell feels NBC should be commended for leaving recent installments of <em>VeggieTales </em>unedited and airing the programs as they were originally written. Now, the parents media advocacy group spokesman adds, he and the PTC hope the national network will &quot;continue this upward trend towards including more programming that the entire family can enthusiastically watch and support.&quot;</div>
</font></font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3325</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3325</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Take Action: Senate to Consider Religious-Liberty Legislation</font></strong></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>In a final attempt to pass conservative legislation before the 109th Congress wraps up this week, Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kans., is pressing to see the Public Expression of Religion Act (PERA), S. 3696/H.R. 2679, pass in the Senate.</div>
<div>PERA would prevent the use of legal fees to threaten local, state and federal governments over establishment of religion cases. For instance, the legislation would have prevented the American Civil Liberties Union from collecting $150,000 from Barrow County, Ga., after a federal judge ordered the county to remove a copy of the Ten Commandments from its courthouse in 2005.</div>
<div>The House of Representatives passed its version of PERA in September. But before the president can sign it into law, the Senate must also pass the bill. </div>
<div>Brownback is attempting to secure unanimous consent to pass PERA in the next 24 hours. Under the rules, in order to pass no senator can object to the bill.</div>
<div>Amanda Banks, federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family, said that's why senators need to hear from their constituents.</div>
<div>&ldquo;This is one last chance we have to pass faith-friendly legislation this year -- and perhaps for much longer,&quot; she said. &quot;It is vital that senators hear from constituents tonight and tomorrow morning. They need to know people care about this legislation and expect their support.&rdquo;</div>
<div><strong>TAKE ACTION:<br />
</strong>You can contact your senators through the CitizenLink Action Center. If you are a CitizenLink Daily Update subscriber, click on the blue &quot;Take Action&quot; button in the e-mail to be automatically logged in to our Action Center. Otherwise, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/dotnet/WebPublish/controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&amp;Definition=Home&amp;XSL=Home&amp;SV_Section=Home">click on this link</a>.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3324</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3324</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">FEMA Allows Gulf Coast Church to Hold Bible Studies</font></strong></div>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>Members had been denied access to a vacant trailer.</em>
<div>
<div>The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has retreated from strong-arming churches along the Gulf Coast for including Bible studies as part of their barbeques for hurricane victims. After much resistance, a letter from the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) made the difference.</div>
<div>Earlier this year, FEMA told the 30-member Calvary Baton Rouge Church it could not use a vacant government trailer to conduct Bible studies after offering meals to people in need. Mitch Lovett, the church's pastor, called it unfair.</div>
<div>&quot;Over the course of the summer, we saw many organizations coming and going from that trailer,&quot; he said. &quot;We always wondered why we weren&rsquo;t allowed there.&rdquo; </div>
<div>Lovett contacted the ADF. Jeremy Tedesco, an ADF attorney, told Family News in Focus the double standard was obvious, but not to the government.</div>
<div>&quot;FEMA&rsquo;s initial response was deplorable,&quot; he said. &quot;The good news is once we sent a demand letter, FEMA respected the rights of these church members and ultimately everybody that wants to go to these facilities and minister to people.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Lovett says there&rsquo;s still a great need along the Gulf Coast. </div>
<div>&quot;We want to always meet physical needs, but our objective is always to share the Gospel,&quot; he said. &quot;That has been, from day one, the reason why we do what we do. We want to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3323</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3323</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">U.S. House Rejects Pro-Life Legislation</font></strong></div>
<div>by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Lawmakers failed to approve a bill that would have required abortionists to tell clients about pain felt by the preborn.</em>
<div>
<div>The U.S. House of Representatives did not garner enough votes this afternoon to pass the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act, H.R. 6099, a bill that would have required abortionists to tell their patients about fetal development and the capacity of preborn children to feel pain. It also would have required doctors to offer pain-reducing drugs for preborn children -- all with the ultimate goal of convincing women not to proceed with their abortions.</div>
<div>The measure, sponsored by Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., was brought to the floor in a way that required two thirds of the House to pass. </div>
<div>Prior to the vote, Smith urged colleagues to pass a bill he called &quot;common-sense legislation.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;The Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act is a modest but necessary expansion of informed consent,&quot; he said. &quot;These kinds of informed-consent booklets have been vigorously opposed by the abortion lobby, and we know for a fact from former, as well as current-day abortionists, that they do not discuss pain. </div>
<div>&quot;They rarely will talk about anything that is even remotely connected with the humanity of the unborn child.&quot; </div>
<div>Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., who opposed the bill, read aloud from the same informational brochure held by Smith -- one developed by the Department of Health and Human Services to educate women about the procedures used during an abortion. </div>
<div>&quot;You may request that anesthesia or other pain-reducing drugs be administered to the pain-capable unborn child if you so desire,&quot; he read. &quot;In some cases there may be some additional risk to you associated with administering such a drug.&quot;</div>
<div>Pallone told colleagues that despite the fact there is a &quot;significant body of evidence that pain is experienced&quot; by a preborn baby, the additional risks posed to the mother are significant enough to reject the legislation.</div>
<div>&quot;It's just really the wrong thing to do to have this as a mandate,&quot; he said. &quot;We should not be mandating something that is not clear, where there may be an additional risk to the woman herself.&quot;</div>
<div>Rep. Shelley Sekula-Gibbs, R-Texas, a physician, took issue with Pallone's argument.</div>
<div>&quot;If anesthesia is now routinely given to women when their fetus is undergoing surgery, it is appropriate to allow them the same choices now,&quot; she said. &quot;As a physician who has practiced for over 20 years, I support informed consent. </div>
<div>&quot;This is really what the bill is about -- it's about giving women the information that their unborn fetus can experience pain.&quot; </div>
<div>Amanda Banks, federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family Actions, said the fact that the 109th Congress ended with the rejection of an important pro-life bill is very disappointing.</div>
<div>&quot;However, not all is lost,&quot; she said. &quot;Hopefully, the persuasive statements made by pro-life members today will be heard by many, and, as a result, more people will realize the horror of abortion and the pain inflicted on preborn children.&quot;<br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3264</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3264</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Pakistan: Christian Woman Jailed</strong></div>
<div><em>December 06, 2006 12:00 AM EST</em></div>
<br clear="all" />
<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5" width="310" align="right" border="0">
    <tbody>
    </tbody>
</table>
<div>
<div> </div>
She defended Christ&rsquo;s cross that extremist Muslims pictured atop a garbage heap. For that, she&rsquo;s in a solitary confinement cell in Pakistan.
<div>Nassem was attacked by extremist Muslims, beaten, and stripped naked in public before being thrown into a jail cell. </div>
<div>Extremist Muslims had created a mob scene protesting Mohammed&rsquo;s caricature published in various non-Muslim publications in other countries. Islamics were screaming hate speech against President Bush and Christianity. Then there appeared a drawing of Christ&rsquo;s cross lopped atop a garbage pile. </div>
<div>With that, Nassem rushed forth, arguing with those holding the poster. She claimed the cross was being desecrated. She also spoke against the protesters&rsquo; hate speech against Christianity. </div>
<div>Then the extremist Muslim mob surged forth. She was grabbed, pounded and her clothing was torn from her body, according to the Pakistan Christian POST (PCP). </div>
<div>Representatives of a Christian agency have asked jail officials for a visit with the captive; but they have been denied visitation rights. Her husband, Gulzar Masih, is left without a wife. For how long, no one knows. Nassem&rsquo;s crime? Blasphemy. </div>
<div>In the meantime, two Christian women in Nigeria have disappeared. </div>
<div>They had been attacked by seven extremist Muslims, females, at Ahmadu Bello University in Kaduna state. The two were preparing for a bath in a women&rsquo;s residence. All of a sudden, extremist Muslim women lunged at them. The fasicxst Islamics had just returned from a nearby mosque. </div>
<div>The Christians were so beaten that they were left unconscious. Somehow they ended up at the university health clinic for treatment. They were registered simply as Joy and Priscilla. However, since the campus facilities closed for a break soon after the Christians were admitted, they have mysteriously disappeared and have not been found since. </div>
<div>A spokesman for the university&rsquo;s Joint Chapel Council informed press that Christians are regularly harassed by extremist Muslims. It is not unusual at all. &ldquo;Muslim students under the auspices of the Muslim Students&rsquo; Society have been terrorizing Christians in the university without provocation,&rdquo; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.crosswalk.com/news/religiontoday/1389534.html"><font color="#000080">according</font></a> to Compass Direct via crosswalk.com  </div>
<div>Family News in Focus reports that throughout the Middle East it is very dangerous for Christians. Religious freedom is sorely lacking. Afghan Abdul Rahman&rsquo;s case highlights the hatred Muslims have toward Islamics becoming Christians. Any converts are to be beheaded, that is, in line with the extremist Muslim-revered Koran and teachings of Mohammed. </div>
<div>&ldquo;Paul Marshall with the Center for Religious Freedom says the fate of thousands of other Christian converts in Islamic countries hangs in the balance, due to &lsquo;laws mandating the death for apostates in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan, Mauritania, the Comoros Islands.&rsquo;&rdquo; </div>
<div>Wherever the sharia is instituted &mdash; that Koran-based &ldquo;legal and justice system&rdquo; &mdash; there is no tolerance for non-Muslims. Sharia demands Islam world rule. Wherever extremist Muslims move around the world, their aim is to institute the sharia, especially in such democracies as America. </div>
<div>If the sharia cannot be instituted publicly at the present time, it is believed that its precepts are followed behind extremist Muslim closed doors. That could account for the increase of mistreatment of Muslim women reported in the United States. Of course, much of such abuse goes unreported. </div>
<div>Here is an example of the Islamic &quot;law and justice&quot; acted out within a Muslim family: They drugged her. Then they choked her. She still showed life. They choked her till dead. She was thrown into a ditch.</div>
<div>One of the brothers is a pediatrician at Assaf Harofeh Hospital, according to CAGE (Coalition Against Global Extremism) / News.</div>
<div>Now the extremist Muslim men are pious before Allah for they committed no crime. They were true to their faith. They acted out an &quot;honor killing&quot; necessary to cleanse what their sister had done. Now they can stand before Islam&rsquo;s deity as cleansed and commendable.</div>
<div>&quot;Two of the brothers confessed to the murder, and one of the brothers re-enacted the incident in front of police.&quot;</div>
<div>Re-enactment usually means applause from community extremist Muslim males. In other words, it&rsquo;s an opportunity for braggadocio. Also, in numerous cases, reporting to the police means finally nothing. Police usually side in with the killer males. So do neighboring males. Even females in the area will support the killers, sometimes reporting on them. The press usually gives such murders scant if any attention.</div>
<div>These murders go on worldwide daily. The brothers reside in Lod. They were indicted Tuesday for killing the younger sister, 20. The &quot;crime&quot; she committed has not yet been reported to the press.</div>
<div>If it is a sharia court which decides their fate, the brothers will be lifted up as examples of true family loyalty. Sharia use the Koran for settling legal disputes. It is this &quot;justice system&quot; that extremist Muslims seek to put in place wherever they move around the globe.</div>
<div>(Note: when such real life, real time actual crimes as &quot;honor killings&quot; take place, they are usually reported in the global Muslim population as &quot;accidents,&quot; hence no research project finally has the actual statistic regarding such abuse.)</div>
<div>The reason the world knows about this is because its original source is the Jerusalem Post <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1143498840778"><font color="#000080">here</font></a>.</div>
<div>&ldquo;Many Islamic countries take the position that Islamic law, which forbids conversion, trumps any other law or treaty. Jared Leland with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty would like to see those countries recognize what are inherent human rights. &lsquo;The freedom of thought, conscience in religion, the freedom to have or adopt any faith of one&rsquo;s choosing are fundamental, but also inalienable rights; they are not to be given and taken at the will of the government.&rsquo;&rdquo; </div>
<div>Copyright &copy; 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr. </div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3263</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3263</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Family Heritage; Too Important to Lose</strong></div>
<div><em>December 04, 2006 01:00 PM EST</em></div>
<br clear="all" />
<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5" width="310" align="right" border="0">
    <tbody>
    </tbody>
</table>
<div>
<div>
<div>I thought it was going to be easy to read the obituary and pay tribute to my Uncle Fed Clark. I was sad for my Aunt Nova &ndash; we call her Aunt Jean &ndash; but I didn&rsquo;t think the emotion would overtake me. It did. The night before, and in the hour or so before the funeral was to begin, I spent time talking to old friends and family that I had not seen in so long - some of them in over 35 years. As we talked about days long past and good times we had experienced at Uncle Fed and Aunt Jean&rsquo;s little home on Little Mud Creek, in East Kentucky, the years came rolling back and the emotion of an era passing really hit home. </div>
<div>As we talked we realized that Uncle Fed and Aunt Jean&rsquo;s home was a central gathering place for many of the nieces, nephews, and neighborhood children. We all went to the &ldquo;TV House.&rdquo; Uncle Fed and Aunt Jean were, for a long time, the only people close by who owned a television. It was great reminiscing about the times spent playing around their home and how good they were to us. As our &ldquo;travel through time&rdquo; conversations continued we began to share about those who had gone before. We had all lost parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles or siblings. The weight of that loss of family heritage and ties to what once was home was heavy. I heard so many people speak so warmly about their experiences with my Uncle Fed and as well the many other members of our family that had passed on &ndash; including my own beloved parents; Verleen Kidd (Aunt Jean&rsquo;s sister) and my dad, Banner Kidd. The heartfelt welcome and outpouring of love I and my family experienced is something that I believe will stay with me for many years. </div>
<div>The LORD showed me some important things through the passing of my Uncle Fed. Family is a God ordained institution. The concept of family runs the gamut. It includes the family of God; who through Jesus Christ are born again into HIS family; the family unit of parents, brothers and sisters, and encompassing the extended family of grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins, both in-laws and &ldquo;outlaws.&rdquo; Family is important to God and should be important to us. What a sad thing it is to realize that after loved ones are already passed on.</div>
<div>Yes, I know the hurt that family members can cause to one-another. I have been on the sending <em>and</em> receiving end of the hurt. The LORD showed me that HIS love surpasses the hurt. The Spirit of God, living in me, as HIS born-again child, enables me to look beyond myself and seek to live a life of selfless love; That I may allow HIM to work in and through me to make a way that HE might reconcile each of us to HIM and to one-another. I realized through this funeral experience that I have a deeper, more abiding love for my family than I realized. I saw that my heritage is passing away without being recognized or honored. And so it is with Uncle Fed.</div>
<div>Fed Clark was a man that deserved respect and to be honored. He didn&rsquo;t get much respect and honor while he was alive. I&rsquo;m ashamed and saddened to say that I did not give him the respect he deserved. He was my uncle, my Aunt Jean&rsquo;s husband and lifetime companion, a military hero, and I want to give him that respect now.</div>
<div>Uncle Fed was born June 30<sup>th</sup> 1929 to Robert and Frona Clark, at Honaker, Kentucky. He was a son, a husband, a brother-in-law, an uncle, and a friend to many. He lived through the death of many of his close family and friends. Uncle Fed is one of the last of a passing generation of people that played big roles in my young years. Those that are left are getting fewer as the years go by. Grandparents, parents, and aunts, uncles, and even some of my first cousins have already passed out of this life. The fact that I love them all is becoming more evident and so is my new found understanding of the importance of that familial heritage. That&rsquo;s why I sense the importance of honoring my Uncle Fed and to attempt to do a better job of honoring those loved ones in my family that are left while I still have them with me. One thing is clear. Those of our generation have allowed priceless keepsakes of memories and heritage pass by virtually unnoticed. I have and I regret it deeply. </div>
<div>You might not be interested in the life of a common man from the hills of Eastern Kentucky, but bear with me for a moment. You just might find a connection, in some way to the memories of your childhood and those that were &ldquo;always there&rdquo; while you were a child.</div>
<div>My Uncle Fed is a man who lived and died a mostly quiet life. As a young man of 17 he worked in the Civilian Conservation Corp, known as the Three C&rsquo;s. In January 1942, as the Second World War raged on, Fed joined the United States Army, to defend his country. Fed was an honest to goodness hero. I am not surprised that many don&rsquo;t know about this aspect of his early life. He rarely spoke of it. I knew some about it, but he never spoke of it except a time several years ago when I was visiting his home. As we talked I asked him about the years he spent in the war. He began to tell me of seeing his buddies killed right beside him and what it was like living in the thick of battle. I asked him specifically about the medals he had won and he shared that story with me. </div>
<div>Uncle Fed was involved in many battles during World War II. As a member of Battery A, 436<sup>th</sup>, he served as an Anti-aircraft Artillery Automatic Weapons crewman, His tour of duty included: Algeria-French Morocco, Tunisia, Sicily, Rome-Arco, Rhineland, Southern France, and Central Europe. Uncle Fed&rsquo;s actions in service to our county caused him to become a decorated war veteran. He received an EAME Theatre Ribbon with 7 Bronze Stars, 1 Bronze Arrowhead and a Good Conduct Ribbon. In fact the press dubbed Fed as the &ldquo;barefooted hero&rdquo; for bravery. It was at night and he was in bed when the attack came. Uncle Fed ran out of his tent in bare-feet and brought down an enemy plane with an M-1 Carbine. When he was telling me the story of downing that plane he showed me a piece of it that he had recovered. I knew a little about Uncle Fed&rsquo;s war history due to sneaking and looking into the trunk he kept in the basement. But I didn&rsquo;t really know this story and the others he related during that one-time conversation. I regret that I didn&rsquo;t take advantage of other opportunities to get to know him more and to learn more of his exploits when I had the opportunity.</div>
<div>After returning from bravely and honorably serving our country in 1947, Uncle Fed married Aunt Jean and settled down in Floyd County Kentucky, on Little Mud Creek. Working by day in the coal mines he spent much of the remainder of his time putting out a garden every year, with the help of Old Pete his mule and a faithful old German Shepherd named Sport by his side. Oh, and I can&rsquo;t forgot his cat Bobby. Bobby had a bobbed tail, thereby earning his name. I remember how Uncle Fed would go through his garden with a coffee can and collect the bugs off his beans and potatoes plants. I remember that many made fun of him for doing that, but they had no problem eating the beans and potatoes he grew. </div>
<div>In the late 1960&rsquo;s Uncle Fed and Aunt Jean moved to Indiana and set up residence in Kendallville. He began working at Newnam Foundry and remained there until he retired and moved back to Kentucky to spend his last days on the land he was raised on. I worked for a very short time at Newnam Foundry with Uncle Fed. At well over twice my age he would work me and many other men in the ground. He worked hard and had a great work ethic. I can still remember walking down the railroad tracks to the foundry in the afternoon as we went to work on the second shift. I didn&rsquo;t know it then, but, in hindsight I see how he took care of me. </div>
<div>When Uncle Fed retired from the foundry and returned &ldquo;back home&rdquo; to Eastern Kentucky, he, once again, took up gardening full-time and became involved with a senior citizens group attending various events. It was said by the group that he always had a smile on his face and was a joy to be around. He had come full circle, back to the place of his birth. His final years were bittersweet as they would never be quite what he expected them to be, but at least he was where he called &ldquo;home.&rdquo;</div>
<div>During the last three to four years of Uncle Fed&rsquo;s life, as his health began to decline, my Aunt Jean stayed by his side. I know she misses him more than I do or any of the family and friends that are left behind. But, life goes on. And one day we too will face that day and keep that appointment that is set for each of us. I was told that Uncle Fed had indicated that he was ready to go home to be with the LORD. With that knowledge, I look forward to the day, when I will see him in heaven along with my beloved parents and other loved ones who have gone before. Then we will all gather around the throne and sing praises to our LORD and Savior who died that we might live forever with him. Jesus said, &ldquo;I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And he who believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?&rdquo; That&rsquo;s a promise I believe. Jesus is asking, &ldquo;Do you?&rdquo; I was told Uncle Fed did. </div>
<div>For family to stay together for eternity, they must become a part of the family of our heavenly Father, the Almighty God, through belief and faith in HIS son Jesus the Christ. My prayer is that as you consider your family ties and the passing of heritage and the members of our family that have passed on and that we still have with us. And that you would take the time to consider whether you are adopted into the family of God. Jesus said that HIS family is made up of those who do HIS Father&rsquo;s will. Being a part of HIS family is the only thing that makes the earthly family of blood relatives work and make sense. Our family heritage in HIS blood assures us of everlasting, eternal life <strong><em>together</em></strong> with HIM. May God bless and keep you. And may HE make HIS face to shine upon you.</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3262</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3262</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Rabbis urge Israelis to revolt against government<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Prominent religious leaders warn Olmert 'destroying Jewish state'</font><br />
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Aaron Klein<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>JERUSALEM &ndash; A group of prominent rabbinic leaders in Israel and abroad yesterday issued a call for Israeli citizens to launch a democratic uprising to bring down the government of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.
<div>&quot;Out of love for each and every Jew, we call on the people of Israel and its leaders to begin a democratic uprising to immediately replace this government, which constitutes an ominous threat to the nation of Israel,&quot; the Rabbinical Congress for Peace, a coalition of over 1,200 rabbinic leaders and pulpit rabbis, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.shturem.net/index.php?section=news&amp;id=10641&amp;lang=english">said in a statement</a>.
<div>Among the Rabbinical Congress members who signed the statement were Mordechai Eliyahu and Abraham Shapira &ndash; both of whom served as chief rabbis for the state of Israel &ndash; and Rabbi Meir Mazuz, head of the Tunisian Jewish community in Israel and one of the country's most well-respected rabbis.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>The rabbis were responding to a national address last week commemorating the death of Israel's founder and first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, in which Olmert stated he is willing to give up most of the West Bank in exchange for &quot;real peace.&quot;
<div>During the speech, Olmert called for immediate negotiations with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. Olmert said he would release &quot;many, many&quot; Palestinian prisoners as part of a deal.
<div>&quot;Ben-Gurion extended a hand in peace to Arab states the year Israel was born. The hand then returned empty, but, like then, the hand remains extended. I extend my hand in peace to our Palestinian neighbors in the hope that it won't return empty,&quot; Olmert said.
<div>Olmert reiterated earlier pledges issues by his office of an Israeli West Bank withdrawal &quot;to establish an independent Palestinian state, with territorial contiguity in the West Bank, a state that will enjoy full sovereignty and will have defined borders.&quot;
<div>The West Bank borders Israel's major population centers and is within rocket firing range of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Israel's international airport.
<div>Since Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip last summer, rockets have been regularly fired into nearby Jewish communities, killing Israeli civilians and prompting widespread panic. In Sderot, an Israeli city about three miles from the Gaza border, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53040">nearly 50 percent of children have been staying home from school for fear of rocket attacks</a>, according to recent reports.
<div>The Rabbinical Congress for Peace labeled Olmert's national address a &quot;crime.&quot;
<div>&quot;In his deplorable speech, Olmert in essence announced a 'liquidation sale' and collective suicide of the people in Israel including the release of thousands of the most dangerous terrorists from Israeli jails. Israeli citizens must launch a democratic uprising and protest to bring down the government immediately,&quot; the rabbis said in a statement.
<div>Continued the statement: &quot;Olmert adheres to the advice of false left-wing 'prophets' instead of adhering to the true prophets as expressed in the Jewish Code of Law that any territorial concession to the enemy will only lead to bloodshed. It will not contribute to calm nor will it promote peace.&quot;
<div>Olmert last week agreed to a cease-fire with the major Palestinian terror groups in the Gaza Strip. The truce called for a halt of smuggling activity by Palestinians and a cessation of rocket attacks launched by militants in Gaza aiming at nearby Jewish communities in exchange for Israel withdrawing its ground troops from the Strip and halting military activity in the territory.
<div>In accordance with orders from Olmert, the IDF removed its troops from Gaza, but at least 23 rockets have been fired from the Strip since the cease fire was imposed.
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53219">WND reported yesterday</a> the IDF has been instructed by the government here not to open fire or take any action against militants who are discovered launching rockets into the Jewish state, according to senior military officials.
<div>The officials said Olmert's security cabinet changed the IDF's rules of engagement after the cease-fire went into effect. Now, if Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are caught launching rockets at Jewish cities, the Israeli military is forbidden to respond, the military officials said.
<div>Previously, the IDF used artillery units and aerial strikes against militants discovered in the process of launching rockets.
<div>IDF sources told WND the Israeli army several times the past few days identified militants about to launch rockets into Israel, but due to changed rules of engagement in response to the cease-fire, IDF forces were prohibited from taking out the rocket crews. For example, hours after the cease-fire was imposed, IDF units spotted seven Palestinians in Gaza setting up rocket launchers. Three rockets were then fired into Israel.
<div>&quot;There is nothing we can do about the rocket attacks. It's only a matter of time before an Israeli is killed,&quot; said an IDF official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to media.
<div>Olmert yesterday told the Knesset his government would react with restraint to continuing Qassam attacks, saying Israel was hoping to give the cease-fire a chance to develop into further steps toward what he called a &quot;peace process.&quot;
<div>&quot;We will fully explore every possibility that can lead to momentum to begin a diplomatic process, and so we are now giving the truce a chance,&quot; Olmert told the Knesset parliament's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee.
<div>Also yesterday, Israeli intelligence officials told the Knesset Palestinians in Gaza have continued to smuggle weapons into the territory from neighboring Egypt.
<div>Last week, IDF chief of staff Dan Halutz told Israel's Knesset that Olmert did not fully consult with the Israeli army before agreeing to the cease-fire with Palestinian militants.
<div><strong>Terrorists: Cease-fire means chance to reload</strong>
<div>In a series of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53106">WND exclusive interviews</a> conducted immediately after last week's cease-fire was finalized, leaders of the four largest Palestinian terror groups in Gaza said the new truce will be used to smuggle weapons into Gaza; reinforce and train &quot;fighter units&quot;; and produce rockets for a future confrontation with the Jewish state.
<div>&quot;The cease-fire offers a period of calm for our fighters to recover and prepare for our final goal of evacuating Palestine,&quot; said Abu Abir, spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees, a Hamas-allied terror organization in the Gaza Strip responsible for many of the recent rocket attacks against Israeli communities.
<div>&quot;We will keep fighting [Israel], but for the moment we will postpone certain parts of the military struggle,&quot; said Abu Abir. &quot;We will reinforce very quickly and rush what we are doing to prepare [for attacks against Israel] in Gaza and in the West Bank.&quot;
<div>Abu Abdullah, a senior leader of Hamas' so-called &quot;military wing,&quot; told WND Hamas agreed to the cease-fire &quot;because we need a period of calm to recuperate. This lull in fighting will not bring us to speak about peace.&quot;
<div>Abu Abdullah is considered one of the most important operational members of Hamas' Izzedine al-Qassam Martyrs Brigades, Hamas' declared military wing.
<div>He pointed to Hamas' doctrine, which calls for the destruction of Israel and which refuses to recognize the Jewish state.
<div>&quot;The political leadership (of Hamas) will never compromise on these values,&quot; the terror leader said.
<div>Abu Abdullah said Hamas has its own political reasons to respect the truce.
<div>&quot;We wish to show Islam as a ruling party is capable of leading the Palestinian people. Since Hamas was elected, we have been through only chaotic periods. We want a period of calm to prove we are not only a revolutionary movement but to show the Palestinian people our rule is without the corruption of (the rival) Fatah (party).&quot;
<div>But Abu Abdullah said the cease-fire would ultimately end in violence.
<div>&quot;All the Palestinian people and all the Muslims will launch a direct confrontation with Israel. This may come soon or it may take some time,&quot; Abu Abdullah said.
<div>Abu Luay, a leader of Islamic Jihad in Gaza, told WND Israel's call for a cease-fire &quot;proves our rocket attacks work. The Zionists know there is now remedy for our rockets.&quot;
<div>The Islamic Jihad leader said Palestinian rocket attacks against Israel would resume &quot;at a time of our choosing.&quot;
<div>Abu Ahmed, the leader of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades in the northern Gaza Strip, told WND his terror group would respect the cease-fire.
<div>The Brigades, responsible for scores of suicide bombings, shootings and rocket attacks, is the declared military wing of Abbas' Fatah party.
<div>&quot;We will respect the cease-fire as the president (Abbas) has ordered us to do,&quot; said Abu Ahmed. &quot;We keep our right to respond to any Israeli aggression. Our group does not give up any of its ideals, which is a withdrawal of the Israelis.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3261</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3261</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><font size="+1"><strong>Gap, Old Navy censor 'Christmas,' replace it with 'Holiday'</strong></font></div>
<map id="Map" name="Map">
<area target="_blank" href="http://www.thenativitystory.com/video_embed.html?src=http://pdl.stream.aol.com/newline/gl/newline/V/nativity/N_Clip_WhyIsItMe_N300_dl.wmv" coords="1,482,120,500" shape="RECT" />
<area target="_blank" href="http://www.thenativitystory.com/" coords="0,0,0,0" shape="RECT" /></map>
<div><font size="-1"></font></div>
<div><font size="-1"><strong>Gap, which owns Old Navy, Banana Republic, Forth &amp; Towne and Piperlime, has become the latest politically correct retailer, intentionally censoring the use of &quot;Christmas&quot; in their in-store, online and printed advertising.</strong> <br />
<br />
Instead of referring to the season as Christmas, Gap instead uses the word &quot;holiday.&quot; <strong>As hard as we tried, AFA could not find a single instance in which Gap-owned stores use the term &quot;Christmas.&quot; Not a single time!</strong> <br />
<br />
When one Old Navy store manager was asked by AFA if the word Christmas was in his store, he answered, <strong>&quot;We have a lot of Christmas gifts in our stores, but the word Christmas is not used here. Everything is 'holiday.'&quot;</strong> <br />
<br />
Gap wants you to do your Christmas shopping with them, but they don't want to mention the Reason for the season. Gap doesn't want to offend non-Christians by using Christmas. The fact that their censoring the use of Christmas might offend Christians seems to be of no importance. <br />
</font></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3260</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3260</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Iraqi Christians plead for help from White House<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Demonstrators at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. tell of 'ethnic cleansing'</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>Faced with growing repression by Muslims, Christians from an ancient tradition in Iraq are calling on American political leaders for help before their entire community is extinguished.
<div>Christian Assyrians and some of their supporters demonstrated in front of the White House yesterday, highlighting an alarming trend reported by the U.N.: While representing just 5 percent of the Iraqi population, 40 percent of the refugees fleeing the country are Assyrians.
<div>One of the speakers at the rally, Nina Shea of Freedom House's <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://freedomhouse.org/">Center for Religious Freedom</a> in D.C., told WND that because of the &quot;ethnic cleansing,&quot; the Christians want an autonomous district in Iraq they can administrate.
<div>The zone, called the Nineveh Plains Administrative Unit, would allow Assyrians and other Christians to practice their faith, speak and teach their language, and work their land without fear of persecution.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>Unlike the Sunnis and Shiites, the Christians have no militia and are completely defenseless, Shea said.
<div>&quot;They need to administrate their own governmental unit to protect themselves,&quot; she said. &quot;Otherwise, with the chaos and violence and persecution targeting Christians for religious reasons, which the U.N. has documented, they will disappear.
<div>Shea insisted it's in the interest of the U.S. to take a stand.
<div>With the loss of the highly educated and skilled Christians, she argued, Iraq is &quot;experiencing a brain drain as well as sane drain &ndash; a force of moderation and a bridge to the West.&quot;
<div>&quot;They have served the U.S. in Iraq nobly, and they will leave a real vacuum,&quot; said Shea.
<div>While the Christians in Iraq have been repressed for decades, Shea pointed out, they have suffered more since the war began, with kidnappings, crucifixions and dozen of churches bombed by jihadist terror.
<div>Among the atrocities documented this year:
<div>
<ul>
    <li>Father Paulos Eskandar, of Mor Afrem Syriac Orthodox Church, was kidnapped Oct. 9 by Muslims and decapitated two days later. He was murdered despite Christians fulfilled a demand to post a text on the church doors condemning the pope's statement about Islam. </li>
    <li>On Oct. 4, a car bomb detonated in a Christian area and killed nine people, including Georges Zara, member of the Assyrian Chaldean Syriac National Council. </li>
    <li>A 14-year-old boy was crucified and stabbed in the stomach, mimicking what was done to Jesus, in Albasra. </li>
    <li>On Oct. 21, in Baquba, a group of veiled Muslims attacked a workplace where a 14-year-old boy named Ayad Tariq worked. The men asked the boy for his identity card. After seeing he was Christian the men asked whether he was a &quot;dirty Christian sinner.&quot; Ayad answered: &quot;Yes, I am Christian, but I am not a sinner.&quot; The rebels yelled he was a dirty Christian sinner and continued to grab him and to scream, &quot;Allahu, Akbar! Allahu, Akbar!&quot; The boy then was decapitated. </li>
    <li>In August, 13 Assyrian Christian women in Baghdad were kidnapped and murdered. </li>
    <li>In January, churches were bombed in Basra and Baghdad.</li>
</ul>
<div>Shea noted that the Kurds, who control the north, have been denying the Christian Assyrians many of the benefits that have come from U.S. largesse.
<div>The electric grids created by the U.S., for example, are left to the discretion of local governments to distribute and manage, and the Christians say they aren't getting their fair share. They cite instances of Kurdish villages receiving electricity while neighboring Christian villages are denied service.
<div>Shea said she has been raising the plight of the Iraqi Christians with the U.S. government for several years, including in a face-to-face meeting with President Bush in her role as a member of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.
<div>She has not received a positive response.
<div>&quot;One of the issues here is that the Christians don't create trouble, they are just victims,&quot; she said. &quot;They don't blow up things, so they don't get attention.
<div>Some have told her the U.S. government doesn't want to establish a precedent of favoritism, by responding to special pleadings.
<div>But Shea argues, &quot;It's not favoring one group to make sure they get their fair share of U.S. construction aid.
<div>The White House did not respond to WND's request for comment. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3259</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3259</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Autopsy Confirms Florida Baby Delivered at an Abortion Clinic was Born Alive</font></strong></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>An autopsy report concerning a baby who was born at an abortion clinic confirmed that the baby was born alive, according to Operation Rescue (OR).</div>
<div>It's unclear whether that determination will affect any criminal proceedings.</div>
<div>An 18-year-old woman who was 22 weeks pregnant went to A Gyn Diagnostics, near Miami, for an abortion. She came back the next day complaining of severe pain and was placed in an recovery room to await the doctor's arrival. Instead she gave birth to a baby girl. The baby was allegedly placed in a plastic bag and thrown on the roof of the clinic, where she was discovered a week later.</div>
<div>Troy Newman, president of OR, said the girl deserved to receive medial attention.</div>
<div>&quot;Once she was born, she was deserving of the same protections under the law as the rest of us,&quot; he said. &quot;At the minimum, she should have been given comfort care.&quot;<br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3225</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3225</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">Liberty Counsel's 'Naughty' List Names Retailers That Censor Christmas<br />
</font></strong><font size="+0"><font size="1">
<div>By Allie Martin<br />
December 6, 2006</div>
<font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - The Florida-based Christian law firm <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lc.org/">Liberty Counsel</a> has developed a checklist cataloguing retailers who either censor or acknowledge Christmas. The &quot;Naughty and Nice&quot; lists are part of the legal group's &quot;Friend or Foe&quot; Christmas Campaign, a yearly effort to combat those who attempt to curb expressions honoring the true meaning of Christmas.</div>
<div>So far, stores on the &quot;Naughty&quot; list include Lowe's, where employees are not allowed to say &quot;merry Christmas&quot; to customers; Banana Republic, whose website refers to a &quot;Holiday Gift Guide&quot; with no mention of Christmas; and Best Buy, whose spokesperson says the use of &quot;merry Christmas&quot; is disrespectful. Meanwhile, among the stores on the &quot;Nice&quot; list are Dillard's, Hobby Lobby, JC Penney, Jo-Ann Fabrics, L.L. Bean, and Wal-Mart.</div>
<strong><em>
<div align="center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lc.org/helpsavechristmas/naughty_nice2006.pdf">Read the current 'Naughty &amp; Nice List</a> [PDF]</div>
</em>'</strong>
<div>Liberty Counsel president Anita Staver says Christian consumers can play a part in fighting against retailer censorship of Christmas. &quot;They need to be on the lookout when they go to stores,&quot; she advises, &quot;and if they wish the people there a merry Christmas, they should expect to hear a merry Christmas in return.&quot;</div>
<div>Christian consumers should not have to expect to walk into a store and see &quot;all the trees labeled 'holiday trees' and 'holiday wreaths,'&quot; Staver contends. &quot;They should see 'Christmas trees' and 'Christmas wreaths.'&quot; Still, she points out, stores such as the Gap, Home Depot, K-Mart, and Bed, Bath, &amp; Beyond have all censored the word &quot;Christmas&quot; this season.</div>
<div>&quot;We had a report from Toys 'R' Us that a Pennsylvania guest relations coordinator had written a customer that the store aims to be neutral about Christmas,&quot; the Liberty Counsel spokeswoman notes. &quot;But when the corporate division found out about this,&quot; she continues, &quot;they said that Christmas is always celebrated at Toys 'R' Us and [that they] disagree with the actions of that store.&quot;</div>
<div>Meanwhile, Staver adds, some stores that have had a policy of censoring Christmas are backpedaling, and Liberty Counsel is glad to see the response that its &quot;Friend or Foe&quot; Christmas Campaign is getting. The campaign is having a definite impact, she says, and she encourages Christian consumers to be on the lookout for stores, schools, and other government or commercial entities that try to censor Christmas.</div>
</font></font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3224</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3224</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">Pro-Life Leaders Tout Importance of Passing Fetal Pain Awareness Bill<br />
</font></strong><font size="+0"><font size="1">
<div>By Jim Brown and Jenni Parker<br />
December 6, 2006<br />
</div>
</font><font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - Pro-life members of the House of Representatives are urging passage of H.R. 6099, the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act, during the current lame-duck session of Congress. The House vote on the bill authored by New Jersey Congressman Chris Smith is scheduled for tomorrow morning (Wednesday, December 6).</div>
<div>If passed, H.R. 6099 would require that women considering an abortion 20 weeks or more after fertilization be informed of the pain their child would feel during the lethal procedure so they may request anesthesia in order to reduce or eliminate the child's pain. The bill would not require anesthesia; it would, however, protect a doctor's right to inform the woman of any risks to her according to the doctor's own best medical judgment.</div>
<div>At a Capitol Hill press conference yesterday, Congressman Smith was flanked by several pro-life lawmakers, including Georgia Representative Dr. Phil Gingrey, who is also an obstetrician-gynecologist. Gingrey addressed the press, speaking from his experience delivering many premature babies, even at as early as 26 or 28 weeks.</div>
<div>The lawmaker and physician noted that, even before a doctor performs a circumcision on a newborn male infant, the doctor is required to inform the mother &quot;that the child is going to experience some pain during the procedure -- a two-minute procedure, by the way -- and to offer pain medication for the child, whether it's an ointment or injection.&quot;</div>
<div>In that situation, Gingrey points out, &quot;literally, using the pain medication takes longer than the procedure itself,&quot; but mothers nevertheless have a right, under the law, to give informed consent. And that, he says, is why, even though many of his ob-gyn colleagues support abortion, they support the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act.</div>
<div>Those doctors support the fetal pain bill, the Georgia Republican explains, because they see it as a &quot;compassionate&quot; piece of legislation that &quot;takes informed consent to the level it should be taken.&quot; And Congressman Smith, author of the bill, agrees, calling the measure &quot;a modest but necessary expansion of informed consent.&quot;</div>
<div>Smith says this important legislation takes up &quot;the morally troubling question of how much pain an unborn child suffers when he or she is dismembered or poisoned by an abortionist.&quot; Also at issue, he asserts, is whether a woman has a right to know &quot;that her child is pain-capable and that an abortion will likely impose excruciating pain upon the baby.&quot;</div>
<div>The New Jersey Republican says he and other supporters of H.R. 6099 believe the answer to that question &quot;is a strong affirmative.&quot; Many pro-lifers, who are looking anxiously forward to tomorrow's vote, are hoping a majority in Congress will respond in the same way.</div>
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cwfa.org/">Concerned Women for America</a> president Wendy Wright was among the pro-lifers who joined Congressmen Smith, Gingrey, and others at the Washington press conference in support of the Child Pain Awareness Act. She says by the 20th week of pregnancy, an unborn baby will feel even greater pain than the mother; but sadly, &quot;this information is rarely communicated to women&quot; along with the &quot;necessary medical knowledge to make a rational decision.&quot;</div>
<div>Congress needs to &quot;denounce the torture inflicted on innocent unborn babies through abortion,&quot; Wright insists, just as many of these lawmakers have denounced the use of torture against terrorists. &quot;The first step,&quot; she adds, &quot;is to ensure that mothers are provided with information on what their child will experience and given options.&quot;</div>
</font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3223</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3223</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">Bolton to Step Down as U.N Ambassador</font></strong></div>
<div>by Pete Winn, associate editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Diplomat had been a courageous voice for pro-family issues.</em>
<div>
<div>John Bolton, America's liaison to the U.N., announced today he will give up his job when his recess appointment runs out as Congress adjourns this month. </div>
<div>President Bush temporarily named Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. after opponents in the Senate blocked his nomination twice. There were still ways Bolton could have remained at his post, but he apparently had had enough.</div>
<div>&quot;I am deeply disappointed that a handful of United States senators prevented Ambassador Bolton from receiving the up-or-down vote he deserved in the Senate,&quot; the president said in a statement. &quot;This stubborn obstructionism ill serves our country, and discourages men and women of talent from serving their nation.&quot;</div>
<div>Thomas Jacobson, Focus on the Family Action's representative to the U.N., said the loss of a man of Bolton's stature is sad and maddening. </div>
<div>&quot;John Bolton twice received more than sufficient votes for full confirmation in the U.S. Senate,&quot; Jacobson said, &quot;but a couple of Republicans and the majority of Democrats acted unlawfully, and for the first time in our history, utilized a filibuster on an ambassadorship.&quot;</div>
<div>The ambassador garnered 54 votes and 56 votes on the procedural motions to end debate and move to a vote by the full Senate. Breaking the filibuster required 60 votes.</div>
<div>&quot;Sixty votes are not what the Constitution requires for presidential nominations,&quot; Jacobson said. &quot;These senators have subverted the president's authority to make appointments. This is a sad day in our history.&quot; </div>
<div>Tom Minnery, senior vice president of Government and Public Policy at Focus on the Family Action, said Bolton's experience is just the tip of the iceberg of what the next Congress holds in store.</div>
<div>&quot;We can expect to see the Democrat-controlled Senate reject other nominees who do not march in lockstep with the Senate&rsquo;s liberal leadership,&quot; he said. &quot;Good men and women will be denied the opportunity to serve their country -- despite their impeccable qualifications.&quot;</div>
<div>Janice Crouse, senior fellow of the Beverly LaHaye Institute at Concerned Women for America, said Bolton made &quot;dramatic strides&quot; in restoring financial responsibility and accountability at the U.N., and in working toward restoring human rights in North Korea and other troubled areas of the world.</div>
<div>&quot;Rather than let accusations remain unaddressed,&quot; Crouse said, &quot;Bolton countered the constant verbal attacks against the United States by international representatives to the U.N. who use that platform for out-of-control anti-American rhetoric.</div>
<div>&quot;Future historians may mark Bolton&rsquo;s resignation as the death knell of the United Nations.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3222</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3222</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div align="left"><strong><font size="3">Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Sex Survey Case </font></strong></div>
<div><font size="3">Washington, DC - Today the United States Supreme Court refused to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in the case of <em>Fields v. Palmdale School District</em>. Liberty Counsel took over the case after the Ninth Circuit had already ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not protect parents from having their children exposed to objectionable surveys in public school. Liberty Counsel requested a rehearing by the Ninth Circuit, which then deleted some of the most harmful language in the opinion (which stated that parental rights stop at the schoolhouse gate) but left the parents with no federal remedy.</font></div>
<div><font size="3">The case involves seven parents who objected to a psychological assessment survey with sexually explicit questions given to children at a California elementary school. The case did not focus on possible state law protections that parents may have. A state law claim was pursued and dismissed in federal court by the original attorneys in the <em>Fields</em> case.</font></div>
<div><font size="3">The denial of review is not surprising, as the Supreme Court accepts very few of the 8,000 or so cases petitioned each year. The Ninth Circuit ruling applies to the states of Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington but does not affect the laws of individual states, which may provide greater protection for parents than does the U.S. Constitution. Since the Supreme Court chose not to get involved in this issue, state laws are needed to adequately protect parental rights. In the absence of a federal remedy, parents must rely on state law. Many states currently have laws that require parental permission and/or opt out provisions whenever the schools address human sexuality. Liberty Counsel has a comprehensive list of the laws of all 50 states. </font></div>
<div><font size="3">Mathew D. Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, stated: &quot;Parents have the primary role of raising and training their children, especially when it comes to topics such as human sexuality. It is outrageous to permit public school employees to indoctrinate our children regarding sex in any manner and at any age. Parents do not cease being parents when they drop their children off at the schoolhouse door. State legislatures should enact laws that protect the role of parents. It doesn't take a village to raise a child. It takes committed parents. Whenever government assumes it knows best how to raise our children, then the family unit will suffer.&quot;</font></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3221</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3221</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div id="isRegion"><font size="+0">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><font size="4">Episcopal Diocese Votes to Secede</font>
<div>
<div>In a public rebuke of the Episcopal Church, a conservative diocese has voted to affirm its membership in the worldwide Anglican Communion after distancing itself from the national church over the ordination of gays and women.
<div>San Joaquin Bishop John-David Schofield called it a first step toward a formal break with the U.S. Anglican denomination, though the proposal makes just minor changes to the diocese's status.
<div>&quot;We have given a signal as to what direction we intend to take,&quot; Schofield said Saturday. &quot;We are now in a position to take seriously any offer the archbishops around the world should come up with.&quot;
<div>Delegates also approved rewriting the Diocese of San Joaquin's constitution to bring its trust fund under the bishop's control, a move immediately questioned by Episcopal leaders.
<div>
<div>The denomination's canons don't give local dioceses sole ownership of church property, said Robert Williams, a spokesman for the Episcopal Church.
<div>&quot;The hope of many is that reconciling dialogue will continue,&quot; he said.
<div>
<div>Divisions erupted in 2003 when the Episcopal Church, the U.S. wing of the 77 million-member Anglican family, consecrated the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire. Traditionalists contend that gay partnerships violate Scripture.
<div>Schofield, who refuses to ordain women and gays, has publicly accused the church's first female leader, Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, of promoting &quot;heresy.&quot; Under his leadership, the Fresno-based diocese has cut back funds sent to the national church and considered a plan to affiliate with an Anglican diocese in Argentina.
<div>The San Joaquin diocese's proposal to distance itself from the American denomination was approved by a majority of the 204 clergy and lay delegates. It formalizes the diocese's identity as a member of the Anglican Communion, rather than a member of the Episcopal Church, but it and other resolutions approved Saturday won't become final unless they receive a two-thirds majority vote at a meeting at a diocesan convention next year.
<div>The amendment was noticeably weaker than one pulled this week that proposed a formal split with the U.S. denomination, which would have set off a legal battle over the diocese's millions of dollars in real estate throughout central California.
<div>National church leaders had been putting pressure on Schofield and other conservatives to ease off their threats to break with the denomination. They proposed creating a leadership position called a &quot;primatial vicar,&quot; who would work with conservative dioceses, performing functions that normally fall to Jefferts Schori, including consecrating local bishops.
<div>Schofield called that offer &quot;absolutely inadequate,&quot; but suggested a truce was not off the table.
<div>Six other conservative dioceses also have rejected Jefferts Schori's authority but have stopped short of secession. The 2.2 million-member Episcopal Church estimates that nearly 115,000 people left the church from 2003 to 2005. At least one-third of those departures stemmed from parish conflicts over Robinson.
<div>
<div>&copy; 2006 Associated Press. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
 <br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3220</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3220</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Christian Doctors Group Seeks Passage of Abortion-Fetal Pain Bill</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
December 1</em><em>, 2006</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>A national organization for pro-life doctors today urged passage of a federal bill that would inform women considering an abortion about the potential pain experienced by their babies after 20 weeks of development.
<div>The House of Representatives is slated to vote on the bill Tuesday or Wednesday of next week.</div>
<div>The 17,000-member Christian Medical Association says no matter where members of Congress stand on the issue of abortion, they should agree that women deserve complete information about abortion before having one.</div>
<div>&quot;One thing both sides of this issue should be able to agree upon is that women should be fully informed about the medical science concerning their developing babies,&quot; CMA CEO Dr. David Stevens said in a statement LifeNews.com obtained.</div>
<div>&quot;Women deserve to know exactly what an abortion involves for their baby,&quot; he explained. &quot;Imagine the heartbreak a woman would experience after being led to believe that her 22-week developing baby is simply a 'blob of tissue' only to learn after an abortion that her baby likely experienced excruciating pain.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;The Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act states the medical science and requires that women be fully informed before proceeding with an abortion,&quot; Stevens added.</div>
<div>Dr. Stevens said the science behind the measure is &quot;clear and compelling.&quot;</div>
<div>He said there is substantial evidence that by 20 weeks after fertilization, unborn children draw away from certain stimuli in a manner which in an infant or an adult would be interpreted as a response to pain.</div>
<div>Dr. Gene Rudd, an obstetrician with the CMA agreed and pointed to existing federal laws that seek to diminish the suffering of animals.</div>
<div>&quot;This bill cites laws protecting animals from inhumane treatment, while a developing human has no such protections,&quot; he said. &quot;What does this say about our blindness to the humanity of our developing babies?&quot;</div>
<div>The Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act, H.R. 6099, also requires abortion practitioners to offer the mother a chance to give the baby anesthesia beforehand. </div>
<div>The House will consider the bill under the &quot;Suspension Calendar&quot; which means the legislation needs a two-thirds vote in order to pass.</div>
<div>Whether the bill receives the necessary two-thirds vote, consideration of the measure provides pro-life lawmakers the first real chance to start a national discussion of the pain babies feel during abortions.</div>
<div>Other pro-life organizations have endorsed the bill including the Family Research Council, Christian Medical Association, Southern Baptist Convention (Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission), Concerned Women for America, among others. </div>
<div>ACTION: Contact your member of Congress and urge strong support for the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act. You can call any member at 1-202-224-3121 or go to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.house.gov/">http://www.house.go</a>v to look up your representative.</div>
<div>Related web sites:<br />
Christian Medical Association - <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cmda.org/">http://www.cmda.org</a><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3219</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3219</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>US Supreme Court Denies Appeal of <span id="lw_1165067208_49">Maine</span> Ban on Religious School Tuition Vouchers</strong><br />
<br />
<div>By Gudrun Schultz<br />
<br />
<span id="lw_1165067208_50">WASHINGTON, D.C</span>., November 30, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal seeking to overturn a decision by the top Maine court upholding a ban on religious schools in a state tuition voucher program. <br />
<br />
The program provides parents from regions without high schools with vouchers to cover tuition at schools of their choice. State school districts in 145 small towns with no high schools provide the vouchers to 17,000 students, who may use them at public or private schools, in-state or out-of-state. <br />
<br />
Religious schools are no longer included, however, after the state passed legislation in 1983, on the grounds that the inclusion of faith-based schools in the program would in effect force the state to fund a religious institution.<br />
<br />
The Institute for Justice represented a group of <span id="lw_1165067208_51">Maine</span> parents who filed suit against the Durham School Department, in Anderson v. Durham School Department, arguing that the exclusion of religious schools from the program violated their First Amendment rights by discriminating against religion. <br />
<br />
The April ruling by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court upheld the state legislation.<br />
The court&rsquo;s decision said the voucher restrictions were not unconstitutional but were an attempt by the state legislature and the attorney general to respect the Constitution by separating church and state, and were not motivated by any religious hostility, according to a report the Associated Press.<br />
<br />
See Anderson v. Town of <span id="lw_1165067208_52">Durham</span> et al:<br />
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.courts.state.me.us/opinions/2006%20documents%20/06me39an.htm"><font color="#003399">http://www.courts.state.me.us/opinions/2006%20documents%20/06me39an.htm</font></a></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3098</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3098</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Supreme Court Refuses Appeal on <span id="lw_1165067045_41">New York</span> Schools Ban of Nativity Display</strong><br />
Ruling permit&rsquo;s Jewish menorah, Muslim star and crescent or Christmas tree, but Not Nativity Scene<br />
<br />
</div>
<div>By Gudrun Schultz<br />
<br />
<span id="lw_1165067045_42">WASHINGTON, D.C</span>., November 30, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A controversial decision by the <span id="lw_1165067045_43">New York</span> Supreme Court to permit <span id="lw_1165067045_44">New York City</span> to ban Nativity scenes in public school Christmas displays will stand, after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to take an appeal on the case. <br />
<br />
The ruling permit&rsquo;s a Jewish menorah, a Muslim star and crescent or a Christmas tree, but the traditional Christmas Nativity display is not allowed.<br />
<br />
A earlier appeal by the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm, on behalf of Ms. Andrea Skoros failed in February 2006 when the <span id="lw_1165067045_45">United States</span> Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that <span id="lw_1165067045_46">New York</span> City&rsquo;s ban was constitutionally acceptable. Ms. Skoros&rsquo; two children attend public elementary schools in <span id="lw_1165067045_47">New York</span>.<br />
<br />
The City defended the policy by arguing that the Jewish and Islamic symbols, displayed on the Jewish holiday of Chanukan and the Muslim commemoration of Ramadan, were &ldquo;secular&rdquo; symbols, while the nativity scene was &ldquo;purely religious.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The Thomas More Law Center petitioned the Court to review its February decision, claiming, among other arguments, that the City&rsquo;s policy was unconstitutional because it showed hostility to Christianity.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;[T]he Constitution does not require complete separation of church and state; it affirmatively mandates accommodation, not merely tolerance of all religions, and forbids hostility toward any.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
See previous LifeSiteNews coverage:<br />
<br />
Supreme Court Asked to Review <span id="lw_1165067045_48">New York City</span>'s Ban on Nativity While Allowing Jewish and Islamic Symbols<br />
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/aug/06082303.html"><font color="#003399">http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/aug/06082303.html</font></a><br />
<br />
US Appeals Court: Schools Can Ban Nativity Display While Allowing Menorah and Islamic Crescent<br />
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/feb/06020601.html"><font color="#003399">http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/feb/06020601.html</font></a></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3097</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3097</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Parents Not Vigilant about Video Games, Report Card Says</font></strong></div>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>They say they monitor more than their children say they do.</em>
<div>
<div>Do you have rules about what video games enter your home? The annual MediaWise Video Game Report found that two-thirds of parents say they are strict when it comes to keeping sexual and violent gaming away from the family. But the kids tell a different story. </div>
<div>The report has good news overall for parents. It found that great strides have been made by the gaming industry and retailers to ensure kids don&rsquo;t get inappropriate content. </div>
<div>&ldquo;Now we&rsquo;ve got the major retailers -- the Best Buys, the Wal-Marts, the Targets -- (who have) perfect performance in terms of our secret shoppers were not able to buy any of the violent adult games in any of those stores,&rdquo; said David Walsh, president of the National Institute on Media and the Family, the group that published the annual report card.</div>
<div>When it came to parents and whether they monitor the ratings of the games their children are playing, however, the news is less optimistic. Walsh said there is a huge disparity between what kids report and what parents say.</div>
<div>&quot;When we surveyed the parents and the kids, we got very different answers from each group,&quot; he told Family News in Focus. &quot;And when we asked the parents, for example, &lsquo;Do you follow the ratings?&rsquo; 70 percent said, &lsquo;Yes, we always follow the ratings.&rsquo; When we asked their kids, that percentage dropped to about 30 percent.&quot;  </div>
<div>As a result, Walsh said moms and dads were awarded an &quot;incomplete&quot; on the report card for neglecting to utilize parental control. </div>
<div>&quot;Either the parents don&rsquo;t know all of the games the kids are buying, or the parents are giving the answer that they know they should give, but really aren&rsquo;t always following through,&rdquo; he added.</div>
<div>Bob Hoose, associate editor of Focus on the Family's <em>Plugged In</em> magazine, says parents really should play the games with their kids to check out what&rsquo;s involved.  </div>
<div>&quot;On some of these, it doesn&rsquo;t take long before you get into some of the real nitty-gritty, the heavy-duty elements of the game,&rdquo; he said.</div>
<div>Some of those elements, he added, include violence and sexual content.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3096</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3096</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">Urge Congress to Pass Fetal Pain Bill</font></strong></div>
<div>by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>Your action is needed to ensure lawmakers vote on and pass a bill that would require doctors to tell women their babies feel pain during an abortion.</em>
<div>
<div>The 109th Congress is almost over and pro-life advocates are urging Congress to bring the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act, H.R. 6099, to the floor while a vote is still possible. </div>
<div>Authored by Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., the bill has 93 co-sponsors. It would require abortion providers to tell women who are aborting 20 weeks or more after fertlilization about the severe pain their preborn children will feel during the procedure. It would also require that the woman be allowed to decide whether her preborn could receive anesthesia, if it is more than 20-weeks-old.</div>
<div>Several studies have shown that preborn babies as early as 20 weeks after fertilization experience severe pain during the abortion procedure. </div>
<div>Federal laws regulating animal welfare require that animals destined for slaughter experience a pain-free death, but that law does not protect preborn children from the remarkable pain they undergo in an abortion.</div>
<div>Dr. Kanwaljeet Anand, a researcher at the University of Arkansas Medical Center and a leading expert on fetal pain, said he has no doubt that babies have the capacity to feel intense pain by the second trimester. In the third trimester of pregnancy, he said, the internal systems for feeling pain are completely developed.</div>
<div>&quot;This is based on multiple lines of evidence,&quot; Anand said. &quot;Not just the lack of descending inhibitory fibers, but also the number of receptors in the skin, the level of expression of various chemicals, neurotransmitters, receptors, and things like that.&quot;</div>
<div>Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), said it is vital for the lame-duck Congress to pass the bill.</div>
<div>&quot;Next year, the leadership of the House will be hardcore pro-abortion loyalists,&quot; he said. &quot;They will block votes on even modest pro-life measures like this one.&quot;</div>
<div>NRLC recently sent a letter to Congress explaining the urgency.</div>
<div>&quot;The (act) recognizes that . . . unborn children are subjected to trauma through abortion that causes them excruciating pain, which would be illegal if inflicted on animals in commerce or research.&quot;</div>
<div><strong>TAKE ACTION:<br />
</strong>Contact your representative using the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/WebPublish/Controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&amp;Definition=Issues&amp;Juris=US">CitizenLink Action Center</a> and ask him or her to support H.R. 6099, the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act.</div>
<div><em>(Paid for by Focus on the Family Action)</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3095</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3095</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Project Focuses on Religious Expression Rights of Students<br />
</strong>
<div>By Ed Thomas<br />
December 1, 2006<br />
</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - A First Amendment and religious speech law firm says it's working to keep public schools from becoming &quot;religion-free zones&quot; and has introduced the &quot;Public School Christmas Project&quot; to begin its educational efforts.</div>
<div>Attorney Bruce Green with the American Family Association's Center for Law &amp; Policy (CLP) says the constitutional religious expression rights of students are being violated in various ways because of a lack of understanding by school administrators about those rights. &quot;Entire school districts,&quot; says Green, &quot;have begun to eradicate all vestiges of seasonal religious expression from the public schools.&quot;</div>
<div><br />
<strong>Bruce Green</strong>  <br />
<br />
The attorney says Christmas is a major victim of that approach, including Christmas greetings, cards, and carols -- and that it is surprising when one hears of the documented lengths to which public schools will go to avoid accusations of illegal endorsement of Christmas or any other religious -themed observance.</div>
<div>&quot;That means no Christmas, no Merry Christmas, no handing out Christmas cards by the students, no sharing of the true meaning of Christmas by students to other classmates ... during instructional time,&quot; he explains -- adding that such measures are not necessary.</div>
<div>In a released statement, the legal group acknowledges that the nation's public schools &quot;play a profound role in shaping the thought and behavior of future citizens and leaders&quot; -- but cautions those those same schools &quot;must not become 'religion-free zones' where the only perspective ever heard is secular and materialistic.&quot;</div>
<div>According to Green, the CLP's Christmas Project has a strategy to erase the misconceptions of administrators -- as well as the &quot;misrepresentations&quot; by some groups -- and to educate the educators. &quot;This is an attempt to inform well-meaning public school officials that it doesn't have to be that way,&quot; says the firm's vice president for policy.</div>
<div>In addition to developing a database of public school officials that will assist the CLP in communicating with America's public schools, the group is sending a memorandum to school superintendents across the country that explains the religious rights of students at Christmas and all year long. Green also assures that the Law Center will also help protect those rights through litigation, if necessary.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3094</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3094</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">A thinly disguised war on Christianity thrives<br />
</font><font size="-1"><br />
</font>
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By David Limbaugh<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2006  </font>
<div>In this self-congratulatory age of multiculturalism and hyper-tolerance, what religion other than Christianity is treated as inherently offensive? In fact, haven't our cultural high priests instructed that we dare not find other religions offensive, but must even enthusiastically embrace them for contributing to our diversity of ideas and values?
<div>Of course they have, but that admonition &ndash; as all but the most inattentive recognize &ndash; doesn't apply to Christianity, as this year's annual war on Christmas demonstrates once again.
<div>The city of Chicago asked organizers of the German Christkindlmarket, a downtown Christmas festival, to reject New Line Cinema as a sponsor because its advertisements for the movie &quot;The Nativity Story&quot; might offend non-Christians.
<div>
<div>
<div>Isn't that line getting a little old, especially in a nation where some 90 percent of the people supposedly identify themselves as Christians? It's always easy to say people might be offended, because some people are always in a desperate hurry to be offended.
<div>But what is more likely is that activist organizations like the ACLU, various atheist groups and other radical secularists want to create the impression that Christianity is offensive to diminish its influence and its presence in the public square.
<div>But since we're talking about offensiveness, how about the sensibilities of Christians? Isn't it far more reasonable for Christians to be offended at the banishment of their displays from the public square than for non-Christians to be offended at their presence?
<div>Yet this obsession with scrubbing away Christianity from public places suggests there is something offensive about Christianity. I wish just once some of these anti-Christian charlatans would be asked to specify precisely which of Christ's teachings they find offensive &ndash; other than perhaps his unequivocal pronouncement of absolute moral standards.
<div>Secular leftists usually tell us that their primary interest in these matters is to ensure that our society and our laws guarantee religious freedom for all. But this nativity flap is one of many that reveal their true mindset, which is hardly as pluralistic and tolerant as they would have us believe.
<div>If religious freedom were their driving motivation, they would be on the side of the German Christlkindmarket and its unfettered right to choose its own sponsors. Shouldn't those who boast of their commitment to religious liberty fight for the right of entrepreneurs to promote Christian-based movies or themes?
<div>But these secular objectors aren't committed to religious liberty across the aboard as they claim, because their tolerance and pluralism don't extend to Christianity, for which they have an obvious hostility.
<div>I saw one propagandist disguised as an ACLU lawyer in an interview on &quot;Fox News&quot; defending Chicago's policy as a vindication of the Constitution's guarantee of church/state separation. Of course, this &quot;constitutional lawyer&quot; <em>has</em> to know better than that the Constitution contains any such guarantee.
<div>Indeed, most of the opponents of the ad aren't seriously objecting on constitutional grounds because even the ridiculously distorted judicial precedent that has turned the First Amendment Establishment Clause into a sword against &ndash; instead of a shield for &ndash; religious freedom won't help them here. Instead, as mentioned, they are hanging their hats on the presumed &quot;offensiveness&quot; of Christianity.
<div>People would be well-served to understand the differences in these issues. While Christians don't set out to offend others, we must be clear that there is no right in the Constitution not to be offended. But there is a right to religious liberty, and it even applies to Christians.
<div>The Framers deemed this right so important that they made it the subject of the very first two clauses of the very First Amendment: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, both of which were designed to safeguard religious liberty, not to separate church and state.
<div>The Establishment Clause was intended to protect religious liberty by preventing the federal government from establishing a national church or religion. The Free Exercise Clause sought to do so by guaranteeing our right to worship as we please.
<div>The zealous advocates of church/state separation and the opponents of Christian expression in the public square, in the name of promoting religious liberty, go a long way toward selectively suppressing religious liberty: that of Christians.
<div>So when you read about such controversies as the one involving the German Christkindlmarket, try to look behind the deceptive claims of the secular activists who are at best fair weather champions of tolerance, pluralism and constitutional religious liberty.<br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3093</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3093</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><font size="4">Abstinence-Only Education Proves Effective<br />
</font></strong><font size="+0"><font size="1">
<div>By <em>AFA Journal</em><br />
November 30, 2006</div>
</font><font size="2">
<div>(AgapePress) - A new study reveals that abstinence-only programs can be effective in reducing teen sex and in delaying their &quot;sexual debuts&quot; without discouraging the use of condoms during future encounters.</div>
<div>The study, under the leadership of author John Jemmott of the University of Pennsylvania, involved 662 African-American students from inner-city middle schools in Philadelphia. Ranging in age from 10 to 15, the participants and their actions led to the following conclusion: Those who received abstinence-only teaching were less likely to have had sex at a 24-month follow-up evaluation, as compared to other students who were exposed to &quot;safer sex&quot; teaching and condom use without a mention of abstinence.</div>
<div>The findings conflict with former President Bill Clinton's comments about how abstinence programs make teens less inclined to use condoms.</div>
<div>&quot;It did not reduce intentions to use condoms, it did not reduce beliefs about the efficiency of condoms, it did not decrease consistent condom use and it did not decrease condom use at last sexual [encounter],&quot; Jemmott explained. &quot;There aren't any studies that show that children are less likely to use condoms as a result of an abstinence intervention.&quot;</div>
<div>However, the foes of abstinence-only education still contend there is harm in the prevention strategy. For example, according to Planned Parenthood, the world's leading abortion provider, abstinence-only programs are &quot;one of the religious right's greatest challenges to the nation's sexual health.&quot;</div>
<div>But Jemmott argued that there is no logical reason why abstinence-only education would not be effective in reducing sexual activity among teens.</div>
</font></font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3092</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3092</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Fifth Circuit Will Hear Case Over Texas Courthouse Bible Display<br />
</strong>
<div>By Allie Martin<br />
November 30, 2006</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - The entire Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will rehear a case involving a longtime display of a Bible on government property in one Texas county. Three years ago an atheist sued Harris County over the Bible display, which is part of a monument erected on the grounds of the Harris County Courthouse in Houston in the 1950s.</div>
<div>Earlier this year, a three-judge panel of Fifth Circuit ruled that the display containing a Bible was unconstitutional. But Edward White III, trial counsel with the Thomas More Law Center, says the monument does not violate the Constitution because it was donated by a local homeless shelter, the Star of Hope Mission. He claims the monument, erected as a tribute to a longtime benefactor named William Mosher, is the &quot;private speech&quot; of the mission.</div>
<div>The Bible display at the county court building is the Christian charity's monument, White says, because it was the representatives of Star of Hope Mission who put the display up and they who were &quot;speaking&quot; through it. &quot;And since there are other monuments up in this courtyard as well,&quot; he adds, &quot;it's not an Establishment Clause violation, [in] that the government is speaking. It's a free-speech issue.&quot;</div>
<div>The Thomas More Law Center attorney believes the fact that the entire Fifth Circuit has agreed to listen to arguments in the matter is an encouraging development for those battling to save the Bible display at the Harris County Courthouse. &quot;If the full court just wanted to have the monument removed,&quot; the court &quot;could have just said, 'We're not going to hear the case,' and then the monument would be removed,&quot; he points out.</div>
<div>When an appellate court decides to rehear a case, this is &quot;always a very good sign if you have lost the case,&quot; White observes, &quot;because it means you now have another crack at it.&quot; The attorney, who authored the Law Center's friend of the court brief on this case, says the Star of Hope Mission's memorial to William Mosher is protected speech under the First Amendment.</div>
<div>The Fifth Circuit's willingness to hear the case &quot;gives us hope,&quot; White adds. He says he and the Law Center are optimistic that the court will permit the Christian charity's memorial to William Mosher to remain at the Harris County Courthouse, on the same public ground where it has stood for more than 50 years.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3091</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3091</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">Split-Shift Parenting Bad for Families</font></strong></div>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>Experts say parents need to assess what's truly worthwhile.</em>
<div>
<div>A study out of Europe contends that &quot;split-shift&quot; parenting -- in which mom and dad each have jobs and divide time at home with their kids -- hurts families. </div>
<div>Experts in the U.K. say work hours need to be more flexible to accommodate family time, but pro-family groups in America say parents may simply need to re-evaluate their priorities.</div>
<div>Researchers say a third of American families are earning two incomes while balancing young children.</div>
<div>Andrea Lafferty, executive director of the Traditional Values Coalition, said parents have to weigh what's truly important.</div>
<div>&quot;Sometimes it&rsquo;s younger families that feel they need the income to have a household, to purchase their first home,&quot; she said. &quot;In the end it&rsquo;s clearly not the best for children or families because no one gets to spend time together.&quot;</div>
<div>Lafferty said when a couple chooses to have children, they need to put them first, and that might mean going without a second car or cable TV for a season. And, she added, the relationship of husband and wife also suffers from a split shift.</div>
<div>&quot;If you don&rsquo;t have a healthy marriage, you don&rsquo;t have a healthy family,&quot; she told Family News in Focus. &quot;Children need to see a stable relationship and a loving relationship between a mother and a father.&quot;</div>
<div>Bill Maier, psychologist in residence at Focus on the Family, said while many split-shift parents may say it's a necessary arrangement just to have the basics, that's often not the case.</div>
<div>&quot;The research seems to indicate that a large percentage of two-working families are doing it simply to get ahead,&quot; he said. &quot;To get a bigger house, to buy a bigger SUV, to have nice toys and nice vacations. I don&rsquo;t believe in the long run that is going to satisfy.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="468" bgcolor="#ffffff" border="0">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top">
            <div>
            <div></div>
            </div>
            </td>
            <td><img width="1" alt="" /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td colspan="5">
            <div align="center">
            <div align="center">&copy; 2006 Focus on the Family. CitizenLink is a registered trademark of Focus on the Family. </div>
            </div>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3090</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3090</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>New Movie &quot;Bella&quot; Excites Pro-Life Community, April Premier Planned</strong>
<div><strong>by Robert Novak</strong><em><br />
</em>November 30, 2006<br />
</div>
<div><em>LifeNews.com Note: Robert Novak is a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times, a nationally syndicated editorial writer, and a widely recognized political commentator on numerous news programs.</em><br />
<br />
An invited audience including Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez gathered at the National Geographic Society's auditorium in Washington Monday night for a screening of &quot;Bella,&quot; an independently produced feature film. No mere movie, it offers hope for the beleaguered anti-abortion movement to reverse the political tide running against it.
<div>This was the eighth such screening in Washington. Monday night's audience reflected the reaction in more than 100 showings nationwide: an emotional experience for a stunning exhibition of cinema art that unexpectedly won a Toronto Film Festival award. It is no propaganda film but a dramatic depiction of choices facing an unmarried pregnant woman. </div>
<div>&quot;Bella,&quot; unknown to the general public, has generated excitement and anticipation in conservative Catholic and other anti-abortion circles. The problem is getting the film in movie theaters around the country for its public premiere early next April. That is never easy for an independent film with no box office names, but the problems are magnified when its message runs counter to the social mores of Hollywood. </div>
<div>&quot;Bella&quot; arrives in an environment that has grown bleak for enemies of abortion. Of 41 freshmen Democrats elected to the House, only three are anti-abortion. Pro-life forces in the House suffered a net loss of 13 members. That means statutory restrictions on abortion, which must be renewed by each Congress, are now in serious jeopardy. <br />
The loss of numerical strength on Capitol Hill reflects a public relations and political victory by the abortion lobby. Republican politicians tend to give only lip service to the issue. Republican candidates have accepted support from pro-life forces -- and then kept quiet about abortion. </div>
<div>Thus, the anti-abortion movement sees &quot;Bella&quot; as providential. It is entertainment, not propaganda. Although Monday's screening was sponsored by the National Council for Adoption, the word &quot;adoption&quot; is uttered only once in the film. There are no tirades against abortion. Indeed, it acknowledges a woman's pain of carrying a baby to term only to give it up for adoption. In the end, however, the film is a heart-wrenching affirmation of life over death. </div>
<div>&quot;Bella&quot; was conceived by three young Mexican men -- producer, director and lead actor -- who are conservative Catholics and want to make movies removed from Hollywood's movie culture of sex and violence. Bankrolled by a wealthy Catholic family from Philadelphia, they shot the film in 24 days in New York City. </div>
<div>The star is Eduardo Verastegui, a Mexican heartthrob as a lead performer in TV soap operas who now lives in Los Angeles. A devout Catholic, he told me he was tired of movies showing Latinos as disreputable and immoral. </div>
<div>It was a stretch to get &quot;Bella&quot; even shown at Toronto, much less win an award. &quot;Going into the festival,&quot; said the Hollywood Reporter, &quot;absolutely no one, including the team of filmmakers that made 'Bella,' ever imagined it would capture the People's Choice Award, voted on by festival audiences.&quot; </div>
<div>Even with the Toronto prize, however, it is hard to get the film in movie houses. The avowed reason for the difficulty is inexperience of the director and a cast with names unfamiliar to American moviegoers. But the film's producers say the same left-wing Hollywood establishment that attacked &quot;The Passion of The Christ&quot; is sniping at &quot;Bella,&quot; which lacks a Mel Gibson in support. </div>
<div>While the audience at Monday's screening was moved to tears, reaction from a commercial theater audience -- including women who have chosen an abortion -- could be different. The pro-life movement hopes, in the absence of effort by supposedly pro-life politicians, it will point to a different way to deal with an unwanted pregnancy.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3089</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3089</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="-1">
<div><font size="+1"><strong>A first for America...The Koran replaces the Bible at swearing-in oath</strong></font></div>
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://emailoffers.store.afa.net/a/jgroup/bg_store-afanet_afaso-1004-2-bp_276.html"></a><font size="-1"><strong>What book will America base it's values on, the Bible or the Koran?</strong></font></div>
<div><font size="-1">Dear Mark,</font></div>
<div><font size="-1">Please take a moment to read the following <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.townhall.com/"><font color="#003399">TownHall.com</font></a> column by Dennis Prager, who is a Jew. <br />
<br />
<strong><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DennisPrager/20/america,_not_keith_ellison,_decides_what_book_a_congressman_takes_his_oath_on"><font color="#003399">America, Not Keith Ellison, decides what book a congressman takes his oath on</font></a></strong> <br />
<em>By Dennis Prager - Tuesday, November 28, 2006</em> <br />
<br />
Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the first Muslim elected to the <span id="lw_1164972911_0">United States</span> Congress, has announced that he will not take his oath of office on the Bible, but on the bible of Islam, the Koran. <br />
<br />
He should not be allowed to do so -- not because of any American hostility to the Koran, but because the act undermines American civilization. <br />
<br />
First, it is an act of hubris that perfectly exemplifies multiculturalist activism -- my culture trumps America's culture. What Ellison and his Muslim and leftist supporters are saying is that it is of no consequence what America holds as its holiest book; all that matters is what any individual holds to be his holiest book. <br />
<br />
Forgive me, but America should not give a hoot what Keith Ellison's favorite book is. Insofar as a member of Congress taking an oath to serve America and uphold its values is concerned, America is interested in only one book, the Bible. If you are incapable of taking an oath on that book, don't serve in Congress. In your personal life, we will fight for your right to prefer any other book. We will even fight for your right to publish cartoons mocking our Bible. But, Mr. Ellison, America, not you, decides on what book its public servants take their oath. <br />
<br />
Devotees of multiculturalism and political correctness who do not see how damaging to the fabric of American civilization it is to allow Ellison to choose his own book need only imagine a racist elected to Congress. Would they allow him to choose Hitler's &quot;Mein Kampf,&quot; the Nazis' bible, for his oath? And if not, why not? On what grounds will those defending Ellison's right to choose his favorite book deny that same right to a racist who is elected to public office? <br />
<br />
Of course, Ellison's defenders argue that Ellison is merely being honest; since he believes in the Koran and not in the Bible, he should be allowed, even encouraged, to put his hand on the book he believes in. But for all of American history, Jews elected to public office have taken their oath on the Bible, even though they do not believe in the New Testament, and the many secular elected officials have not believed in the Old Testament either. Yet those secular officials did not demand to take their oaths of office on, say, the collected works of Voltaire or on a volume of <span id="lw_1164972911_1">New York</span> Times editorials, writings far more significant to some liberal members of Congress than the Bible. Nor has one Mormon official demanded to put his hand on the Book of Mormon. And it is hard to imagine a scientologist being allowed to take his oath of office on a copy of &quot;Dianetics&quot; by L. Ron Hubbard. <br />
<br />
So why are we allowing Keith Ellison to do what no other member of Congress has ever done -- choose his own most revered book for his oath? <br />
<br />
The answer is obvious -- Ellison is a Muslim. And whoever decides these matters, not to mention virtually every editorial page in America, is not going to offend a Muslim. In fact, many of these people argue it will be a good thing because Muslims around the world will see what an open society America is and how much Americans honor Muslims and the Koran. <br />
<br />
This argument appeals to all those who believe that one of the greatest goals of America is to be loved by the world, and especially by Muslims because then fewer Muslims will hate us (and therefore fewer will bomb us). <br />
<br />
But these naive people do not appreciate that America will not change the attitude of a single American-hating Muslim by allowing Ellison to substitute the Koran for the Bible. In fact, the opposite is more likely: Ellison's doing so will embolden Islamic extremists and make new ones, as Islamists, rightly or wrongly, see the first sign of the realization of their greatest goal -- the Islamicization of America. <br />
<br />
When all elected officials take their oaths of office with their hands on the very same book, they all affirm that some unifying value system underlies American civilization. If Keith Ellison is allowed to change that, he will be doing more damage to the unity of America and to the value system that has formed this country than the terrorists of 9-11. It is hard to believe that this is the legacy most Muslim Americans want to bequeath to America. But if it is, it is not only <span id="lw_1164972911_2">Europe</span> that is in trouble. </font></div>
</font></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3088</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3088</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>'Humanists' Challenge Voting Booths in Churches<br />
</strong><font color="#000000" size="-1">Susan Jones</font><br />
<font color="#000000" size="-1">Senior Editor</font><br />
<br />
<font size="-1">(CNSNews.com) - The American Humanist Association on Wednesday announced the launch of the first &quot;nontheistic&quot; legal center in the nation's capital -- a direct response, it said, to the &quot;influence exerted by the religious right under the Bush administration.&quot; <br />
<br />
The group said it is particularly concerned about &quot;damage&quot; to Thomas Jefferson's &quot;wall of church-state separation.&quot; <br />
<br />
The AHA's first legal project (lawsuit) stems from the midterm elections. The group is challenging the location of polling places in churches. While some churches cover their religious symbols on Election Day, others do not, and the AHA sees that as a major problem.<br />
<br />
Humanists plan to argue that religious proselytizing took place at the polls. &quot;We put out a call to our members whose polling places were churches, asking them to report what they saw,&quot; said AHA President Mel Lipman. &quot;The response was shocking.&quot;<br />
<br />
An Illinois humanist says he voted in a church that displayed a four-foot wooden crucifix right above the election judges,&quot; said AHLC attorney James Hurley. <br />
<br />
&quot;Another member in California was confronted with a large marble plaque dedicated to the 'unborn children' who are 'killed' by abortion and containing a quote from the Bible justifying the notion that the soul is alive in the womb. <br />
<br />
&quot;And a New York member voted in a room featuring large religious slogans on the wall behind the voting machines.&quot;<br />
<br />
But the AHA said it would pursue &quot;one of the most egregious and well-documented cases&quot; -- that of plaintiff Jerry Rabinowitz who was assigned to vote at Emmanuel Catholic Church in Delray Beach, Fla. <br />
<br />
The case, Rabinowitz v. Anderson, alleges that to enter the polling place, Rabinowitz had to walk past a church-sponsored &quot;pro-life&quot; banner framed by multiple giant crosses. In the voting area itself, &quot;he observed many religious symbols in plain view, both surrounding the election judges and in direct line above the voting machines. He took photographs that will be entered in evidence,&quot; the attorney Hurley said.<br />
<br />
&quot;George W. Bush has been busy appointing conservative Christian judges who don't support the separation of church and state,&quot; said AHA Executive Director Roy Speckhardt. &quot;And year after year we're seeing government intruding further and further into the religious sphere.&quot;<br />
<br />
The humanist legal center says it includes more than two dozen lawyers from around the country, backed by thousands of humanists from coast to coast, who seek to have humanist values represented in the legal arena. <br />
<br />
(The AHA defines humanism as a &quot;progressive philosophy of life that, without supernaturalism [religion], affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity.&quot; It rejects &quot;religious propaganda.&quot;) The group says its new legal center &quot;will work to make sure that the First Amendment to our Constitution is honored.&quot;<br />
<br />
It will do so by calling attention to &quot;injustices,&quot; Lipman added. And at the same time, it will &quot;educate Americans on the importance of religious liberty and the plight of humanists in the United States.&quot; <br />
</font>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3085</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3085</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Legal Group Tells IRS to Back Off Intimidating Churches<br />
</strong>
<div>By Jeff Johnson<br />
November 29, 2006</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - A religious liberties group says it has had enough of the Internal Revenue Service bullying pastors, and wants those pastors and churches to know that the U.S. Constitution trumps IRS regulations about what can and can't be said from the pulpit.</div>
<div>The Washington, DC-based Becket Fund for Religious Liberty says the First Amendment -- which forbids the government from prohibiting free speech or establishing an official religion -- take precedence over regulations established by the IRS concerning political speech from the pulpit of a house of worship. Anthony Picarello, vice president and general counsel for the Becket Fund, says the first mistake most churches make when they are confronted with an IRS investigation is keeping quiet about it. He recommends they go public.</div>
<div>&quot;Make sure that the world knows about what's going on,&quot; he suggests. &quot;I think that's one of the best approaches that a church can take when it's confronted with this sort of investigation.&quot; The attorney believes the federal agency does not have the resources to fight drawn-out battles against churches and cannot afford the kind of negative publicity such cases generate.</div>
<div>Picarello says groups like Americans United for Separation of Church and State frequently file complaints against churches when their pastors address politics from the pulpit. Those churches, he says, should call his group.</div>
<div>&quot;What we've taken a stand on is the ability of any minister of any faith to preach on any topic -- political or otherwise, short of an incitement to violence -- from the pulpit,&quot; he explains. &quot;That is precisely the kind of freedom that the First Amendment protects.&quot;</div>
<div>The Becket Fund spokesman says if the IRS pursues penalizing churches, synagogues, or mosques for what their ministers say from the pulpit, &quot;then the IRS is going to have a fight on its hands.&quot; He says his firm will defend any pastor's statement from the pulpit that does not involve an incitement to commit violence.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3084</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3084</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>   </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div><strong><font size="5">ACLU Targets Tennessee School Christmas Program</font></strong></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has charged that a Tennessee school's Christmas program was &ldquo;an illegal activity&rdquo; and is seeking to have it declared unconstitutional.</div>
<div>The ACLU said it was against the law for kindergarten students at a Wilson County elementary school to act in a Nativity scene and sing &quot;Away in the Manger&quot; and &quot;Joy to the World.&quot; The group is arguing that teachers and other school officials caused harm to a student with &ldquo;Christian themes and songs.&rdquo; In fact, the ACLU said the child &ldquo;suffered irreparable damage.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Jay Sekulow, chief counsel for The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), which is representing school officials, called the suit &ldquo;outrageous.&rdquo;</div>
<div>&ldquo;In their never-ending quest to completely eradicate all things religious from public life,&rdquo; he said, &ldquo;the ACLU&rsquo;s latest lawsuit is an all-out frontal attack on the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.&rdquo;<br />
 <br />
School programs that include a live Nativity scene and Christian-themed songs are common throughout the U.S. and around the world. Thousands of school students will be participating in similar programs this year.  <br />
 <br />
&ldquo;We are standing with the school officials in Wilson County and with concerned students and parents,&quot; Sekulow said. &ldquo;We are not going to sit back and let the ACLU, the Ghost of Christmas Past, remove the joy and significance of this holiday season.&rdquo; <br />
  <br />
The ACLJ has launched a nationwide campaign, called Keep HIM in Christmas, to defend the rights of Americans to engage in free speech during the Christmas season.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3083</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3083</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Baptists and homosexuals<br />
N.C. Baptist Convention upholds scripture by calling a sin a sin</h3>
<p><em>From Gray Abercrombie of Fort Mill, S.C., who recently completed a four-year term as a Baptist deacon: </em></p>
<p>The founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network has taken the Baptist State Convention of North Carolina to task for excluding homosexuals from the denomination (&quot;Baptists again side with cause of exclusion,&quot; Nov. 19). The convention did no such thing.</p>
<p>What the convention did do was pass a resolution in which current member churches that ordain homosexual clergy, make public statements supporting homosexuality, baptize or allow openly homosexual members would be disassociated from the convention. As one spokesman said, the reason the convention felt the need for action was that homosexuality seems to be the only sin with its own advocacy group. The convention's intention is to hold member churches accountable to the authority of scripture.</p>
<p>The convention's resolution is not even close to being the same thing as excluding homosexuals. In fact, most churches, including the Baptists, would welcome the chance to minister to homosexuals. They are certainly valuable in God's eyes and they are valuable in the eyes of Christians. Just because Christians reject homosexuality and the homosexual agenda of normalizing what they view as immoral, that doesn't mean they are not fulfilling the second greatest commandment, &quot;Love your neighbor as yourself.&quot;</p>
<p>The error here results from confusion over what is love and what is sympathy. Sympathy would make no demands and would encourage whatever seems to fulfill the individual at the moment. Love involves a certain accountability and discipline. I love my children, but I don't let them engage in harmful behavior just because they think it's fun. Why would Christians accept and condone a lifestyle that runs counter to biblical teaching when that lifestyle results in reducing the practitioner's life span by an average of 20 years?</p>
<p>Trying to jump on the civil rights bandwagon by condemning the church's conduct in dealing with racism and slavery in the South is not a very good argument, for these reasons:</p>
<p>1. Ethnicity is not determined by conduct. No one does anything to be born of a particular race. Scripture plainly states that there is to be no distinction of race, gender or social status for Christians, that all are equal before God.</p>
<p>3. The Bible gives very clear and consistent instructions of how we are to conduct ourselves in the area of sexuality. Homosexual activists condemn the church for ignoring biblical teaching in the area of race relations, but then turn around and ask it to ignore biblical teachings when it comes to sexuality. Go figure.</p>
<p>The solution is simple. Members of the N.C. Baptist Convention certainly believe man was created in the image of God. Implicit in this is the idea that God designed us a certain way and has placed moral demands on us in every area of life.</p>
<p>The only thing homosexual activists have to do to get the convention to reverse what they view as a misguided resolution is to explain to them how the human body designed by God was designed for homosexual sex.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3082</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=3082</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><strong>Congress to Hold Vote on Abortion-Fetal Pain Measure Next Week</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>The House of Representatives will hold the first-ever vote next week on a measure that would inform women considering an abortion after 20 weeks into pregnancy that their baby will feel intense pain as a result of the abortion. <br />
<br />
The bill also requires abortion practitioners to offer the mother a chance to give the baby anesthesia beforehand.
<div>Rep. Chris Smith, a pro-life New Jersey Republican, is the lead sponsor of the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act (H.R. 6099) and 93 members of the House have signed on as co-sponsors.</div>
<div>The measure came into existence following testimony in Congress during debate on the federal partial-birth abortion ban as witnesses testified that unborn children past 20 weeks from fertilization feel excruciating pain during the course of an abortion.</div>
<div>The House will consider the bill under the &quot;Suspension Calendar&quot; which means the legislation needs a two-thirds vote in order to pass.</div>
<div>Whether the bill receives the necessary two-thirds vote, consideration of the measure provides pro-life lawmakers the first real chance to start a national discussion of the pain babies feel during abortions.</div>
<div>A doctor who is considered the leading expert on fetal pain says he has no doubt that babies have the capacity to feel intense pain by the second trimester. In the third trimester of pregnancy, he says the internal systems for feeling pain are completely developed. </div>
<div>Dr. Kanwaljeet Anand of the University of Arkansas Medical Center has confirmed that the baby's ability to feel pain before birth. <br />
<br />
In a June interview with a Little Rock television station he said an unbon child's ability to feel pain &quot;will develop sometime during the second trimester and by the third trimester the pain system is completely functional.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Anand has said medical studies conclude that unborn babies are &quot;very likely&quot; to be &quot;extremely sensitive to pain during the gestation of 20 to 30 weeks.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;This is based on multiple lines of evidence,&quot; Dr. Anand said. &quot;Not just the lack of descending inhibitory fibers, but also the number of receptors in the skin, the level of expression of various chemicals, neurotransmitters, receptors, and things like that.&quot;</div>
<div>Anand explained that later-term abortion procedures, such as a partial-birth abortion, &quot;would be likely to cause severe pain.&quot;<br />
</div>
<div>A British study conducted in April confirms Anand's explanation about fetal pain.</div>
<div>Published in the Journal of Neuroscience by a team from University College London, the study analyzed brain scans taken on premature babies when blood was being drawn from them. <br />
<br />
The results found that <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2191.html">babies as young as 24 weeks after pregnancy can feel pain</a> and the researchers hope the study will prompt new pain treatment methods.</div>
<div>Dr. Anand said causing an unborn child pain could have adverse long-term ramifications.</div>
<div>&quot;Some fetuses that are chronically exposed to very toxic environments will be stressed simply from the fact that they are in these very loud, very difficult environments,&quot; he said.</div>
<div>&quot;There's also this issue of abuse. Abuse of spouse pretty clearly during pregnancy, and that will have an impact on the brain of this fetus is developing and what is going to be this child's behavior,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
ACTION: Contact your member of Congress and urge strong support for the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act. You can call any member at 1-202-224-3121 or go to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.house.gov/">http://www.house.gov</a> to look up your representative.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Printed from: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2785.html">http://www.lifenews.com/nat2785.html</a></em><br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2980</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2980</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Congress to Hold Vote on Abortion-Fetal Pain Measure Next Week</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
November 27</em><em>, 2006</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>The House of Representatives will hold the first-ever vote next week on a measure that would inform women considering an abortion after 20 weeks into pregnancy that their baby will feel intense pain as a result of the abortion. <br />
<br />
The bill also requires abortion practitioners to offer the mother a chance to give the baby anesthesia beforehand.
<div>Rep. Chris Smith, a pro-life New Jersey Republican, is the lead sponsor of the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act (H.R. 6099) and 93 members of the House have signed on as co-sponsors.</div>
<div>The measure came into existence following testimony in Congress during debate on the federal partial-birth abortion ban as witnesses testified that unborn children past 20 weeks from fertilization feel excruciating pain during the course of an abortion.</div>
<div>The House will consider the bill under the &quot;Suspension Calendar&quot; which means the legislation needs a two-thirds vote in order to pass.</div>
<div>Whether the bill receives the necessary two-thirds vote, consideration of the measure provides pro-life lawmakers the first real chance to start a national discussion of the pain babies feel during abortions.</div>
<div>A doctor who is considered the leading expert on fetal pain says he has no doubt that babies have the capacity to feel intense pain by the second trimester. In the third trimester of pregnancy, he says the internal systems for feeling pain are completely developed. </div>
<div>Dr. Kanwaljeet Anand of the University of Arkansas Medical Center has confirmed that the baby's ability to feel pain before birth. <br />
<br />
In a June interview with a Little Rock television station he said an unbon child's ability to feel pain &quot;will develop sometime during the second trimester and by the third trimester the pain system is completely functional.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Anand has said medical studies conclude that unborn babies are &quot;very likely&quot; to be &quot;extremely sensitive to pain during the gestation of 20 to 30 weeks.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;This is based on multiple lines of evidence,&quot; Dr. Anand said. &quot;Not just the lack of descending inhibitory fibers, but also the number of receptors in the skin, the level of expression of various chemicals, neurotransmitters, receptors, and things like that.&quot;</div>
<div>Anand explained that later-term abortion procedures, such as a partial-birth abortion, &quot;would be likely to cause severe pain.&quot;<br />
</div>
<div>A British study conducted in April confirms Anand's explanation about fetal pain.</div>
<div>Published in the Journal of Neuroscience by a team from University College London, the study analyzed brain scans taken on premature babies when blood was being drawn from them. <br />
<br />
The results found that <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2191.html">babies as young as 24 weeks after pregnancy can feel pain</a> and the researchers hope the study will prompt new pain treatment methods.</div>
<div>Dr. Anand said causing an unborn child pain could have adverse long-term ramifications.</div>
<div>&quot;Some fetuses that are chronically exposed to very toxic environments will be stressed simply from the fact that they are in these very loud, very difficult environments,&quot; he said.</div>
<div>&quot;There's also this issue of abuse. Abuse of spouse pretty clearly during pregnancy, and that will have an impact on the brain of this fetus is developing and what is going to be this child's behavior,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
ACTION: Contact your member of Congress and urge strong support for the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act. You can call any member at 1-202-224-3121 or go to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.house.gov/">http://www.house.gov</a> to look up your representative.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Printed from: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2785.html">http://www.lifenews.com/nat2785.html</a></em><br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2979</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2979</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Who really cares?<br />
By Thomas Sowell<br />
</h3>
<div>More frightening than any particular beliefs or policies is an utter lack of any sense of a need to test those beliefs and policies against hard evidence. Mistakes can be corrected by those who pay attention to facts but dogmatism will not be corrected by those who are wedded to a vision.
<div>One of the most pervasive political visions of our time is the vision of liberals as compassionate and conservatives as less caring. It is liberals who advocate &quot;forgiveness&quot; of loans to Third World countries, a &quot;living wage&quot; for the poor and a &quot;safety net&quot; for all.
<div>But these are all government policies -- not individual acts of compassion -- and the actual empirical consequences of such policies are of remarkably little interest to those who advocate them. Depending on what those consequences are, there may be good reasons to oppose them, so being for or against these policies may tell us nothing about who is compassionate or caring and who is not.
<div>A new book, titled &quot;Who Really Cares&quot; by Arthur C. Brooks examines the actual behavior of liberals and conservatives when it comes to donating their own time, money, or blood for the benefit of others. It is remarkable that beliefs on this subject should have become conventional, if not set in concrete, for decades before anyone bothered to check these beliefs against facts.
<div>What are those facts?
<div>People who identify themselves as conservatives donate money to charity more often than people who identify themselves as liberals. They donate more money and a higher percentage of their incomes.
<div>It is not that conservatives have more money. Liberal families average 6 percent higher incomes than conservative families.
<div>You may recall a flap during the 2000 election campaign when the fact came out that Al Gore donated a smaller percentage of his income to charity than the national average. That was perfectly consistent with his liberalism.
<div>So is the fact that most of the states that voted for John Kerry during the 2004 election donated a lower percentage of their incomes to charity than the states that voted for George W. Bush.
<div>Conservatives not only donate more money to charity than liberals do, conservatives volunteer more time as well. More conservatives than liberals also donate blood.
<div>According to Professor Brooks: &quot;If liberals and moderates gave blood at the same rate as conservatives, the blood supply of the United States would jump about 45 percent.&quot;
<div>Professor Brooks admits that the facts he uncovered were the opposite of what he expected to find -- so much so that he went back and checked these facts again, to make sure there was no mistake.
<div>What is the reason why some people are liberals and others are conservatives, if it is not that liberals are more compassionate?
<div>Fundamental differences in ideology go back to fundamental assumptions about human nature. Based on one set of assumptions, it makes perfect sense to be a liberal. Based on a different set of assumptions, it makes perfect sense to be a conservative.
<div>The two visions are not completely symmetrical, however. For at least two centuries, the vision of the left has included a belief that those with that vision are morally superior, more caring and more compassionate.
<div>While both sides argue that their opponents are mistaken, those on the left have declared their opponents to be not merely in error but morally flawed as well. So the idea that liberals are more caring and compassionate goes with the territory, whether or not it fits the facts.
<div>Those on the left proclaimed their moral superiority in the 18th century and they continue to proclaim it in the 21st century. What is remarkable is how long it took for anyone to put that belief to the test -- and how completely it failed that test.
<div>The two visions are different in another way. The vision of the left exalts the young especially as idealists while the more conservative vision warns against the narrowness and shallowness of the inexperienced. This study found young liberals to make the least charitable contributions of all, whether in money, time or blood. Idealism in words is not idealism in deeds.<br />
<br />
<em>
<div><font size="2"><em>Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465081452/ref=nosim/townhallcom">Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy</a>.</em></font> </div>
</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2978</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2978</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h2><strong><font size="5">Conservatives More Generous Than Liberals</font></strong></h2>
<p>from staff reports</p>
<p><em>Research counters common claims of economic justice.</em> </p>
<p>Although liberals are often quick to say they are the stalwarts of &quot;social and economic justice,&quot; research continues to show that when it comes to charity, churchgoing conservatives give far more to help the poor.</p>
<p>The book <em>Who Really Cares</em> is the latest to come to that conclusion, surprising even Arthur Brooks, the author. He told Family News in Focus he began his research expecting to bolster the claim that liberals are the most generous -- but found the opposite.</p>
<p>&quot;People who attend a house of worship give four times more money per year than people who don't,&quot; he said. &quot;For people who are deeply religious, there is the notion that religion or religious behavior and charity come from the same God-given impulse. In other words, God makes you charitable.&quot;</p>
<p>Kristi Hamrick, a spokeswoman for American Values, said Brooks' research is a breath of fresh air for conservatives tired of being lambasted by liberals as selfish.</p>
<p>&quot;Despite all the bad press that the liberals and elitists like to give people of faith,&quot; she said, &quot;the truth is, that those Christian values of tithing, of helping the poor, of seeing the needy -- these things motivate the community of faith to give and to give generously and to give above and beyond the call.&quot;</p>
<p>Brooks said he tells conservatives not to celebrate their giving and tells liberals to take the gap in giving as a lesson. </p>
<p>&quot;It's a call to action to make sure that giving values are taught more widely among American liberals,&quot; he said, &quot;so that they can take their place in the fabric of voluntary charity that is characteristic of American values and American culture.&quot;<br />
</p>
<div></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2977</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2977</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Hi-Tech Web Site Helps Parents Protect Their Kids from Sexual Predators</strong></div>
<div><em>November 25, 2006 05:21 PM EST</em></div>
<br clear="all" />
<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5" width="310" align="right" border="0">
    <tbody>
    </tbody>
</table>
<div>by Nathan Tabor and Jim Kouri - The FBI's Crimes Against Children Unit coordinates the development and implementation of a National Sex Offenders Registry, but there have been some complaints regarding their web site being overly complicated.</div>
<div>
<div>The Pam Lychner Sexual Offender Tracking and Identification Act of 1996 (Lychner Act), requires the Attorney General to establish a national database at the FBI to track the whereabouts and movements of certain convicted sex offenders under Title 42 of the United States Code Section 14072. <br />
<br />
The National Crime Information Center (NCIC) enables the NSOR to retain the offender's current registered address and dates of registration, conviction, and residence.<br />
<br />
Megan's Law, enacted in May 1996, amends the Wetterling Program with regard to the disclosure of information collected by a state SOR program. The law gives states broad discretion to determine to whom notification should be made about offenders, under what circumstances, and about which offenders. <br />
<br />
But a private non-governmental organization has developed its own National Sex Offender Registry. Family Watchdog (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.familywatchdog.us)/"><font color="#000080">www.familywatchdog.us)</font></a> is a comprehensive web site that's easy to utilize and open to any and all concerned Americans.<br />
<br />
Site visitors may search Family Watchdog's database using locations or the names of suspects. Utilizing coded maps, visitors can zero-in on their own neighborhoods to identify not only child predators, but also convicted rapists and other perpetrators of violence.<br />
<br />
One fascinating feature allows users to discover how many sexual predators live or work near their children's schools. Information on convicted sex offenders is just a mouse click away. Plus Family Watchdog provides visitors with important tips on how to protect their children.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2943</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2943</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">New U.S. dollar coins hide 'In God We Trust'<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">On gold-colored presidential pieces, national motto relegated to thin edge</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>WASHINGTON &ndash; &quot;In God We Trust,&quot; the official national motto since 1956 and a familiar sight on U.S. coins and currency, will be hard to find on the new presidential dollar coins scheduled for release to the public Feb. 15, 2007.
<div>The new gold-colored dollar pieces, featuring an images of U.S. presidents, will move the inscription from the face of the coin to the thin edge, along with the year and the previous national motto, &quot;E Pluribus Unum,&quot; Latin for &quot;Out of Many, One.&quot;
<div>The official reason for the design change? To allow space for larger portraits of the presidents on the face and the Statue of Liberty on the reverse, according to the Mint.
<div>The new coins will be the same size as the 1979 Susan B. Anthony and the 2000-2002 Sacajawea.
<div>For the first time the coin will also say &quot;$1&quot; instead of &quot;One Dollar.&quot;
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>Images of George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison are scheduled to appear on the coins in 2007, with a different president appearing every three months.
<div>The series will honor four different presidents per year, in the order they served in office. Each president will appear on only one coin, except for Grover Cleveland, who will be on two because he was the only president to serve non-consecutive terms. To be depicted on a coin, a president must have been dead for at least two years.
<div>&quot;In God We Trust&quot; became the national motto by an act of Congress in 1956 and officially superseded &quot;E Pluribus Unum.&quot;
<div>The most common place where the motto is observed in daily life is on U.S. currency and coinage. The first United States coin to bear this national motto was the 1864 two-cent piece. It wasn't until 1957 that the motto was permanently adopted for use on U.S. money. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2942</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2942</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 14pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, Sans-Serif">Prenatal Screening not so Accurate as Once Thought &ndash; &ldquo;Normal&rdquo; Children Killed as &ldquo;Defective&rdquo;?</div>
<div style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, Sans-Serif">Scientists conclude there is really no such thing as &ldquo;normal&rdquo; in genetic inheritance</div>
<div class="content" style="TEXT-ALIGN: left">
<div>By Hilary White<br />
<br />
TORONTO, November 24, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) &ndash; New research has found that more genetic differences exist among people than previous research had indicated. In 2000 the international team of scientists working on the Human Genome project said that there was only a miniscule percentage of difference between people. <br />
<br />
At about the same time, genetic screening was introduced as a common feature of prenatal care and as part of artificial procreation in IVF facilities. The new research shows, however, that this screening is not as accurate as previously thought.<br />
<br />
In the new study, 270 volunteers from different countries were tested and the researchers found that the genetic continuance from parents to child is not as straightforward as previously thought. In fact, the conclusion seems to be that there is really no such thing as &ldquo;normal&rdquo; in genetic inheritance. <br />
<br />
This means that screens for genetic abnormality are unrealizable without a reliable standard of &ldquo;normal.&rdquo; The report, published in the journal Nature suggests that prenatal screening may have incorrectly diagnosed genetic abnormalities as defects.<br />
<br />
In the period since the growth of genetic screening, in both IVF and natural conception, fewer children are being allowed to live to birth because of suspected genetic defects such as Down&rsquo;s syndrome. With abortion being available in many jurisdictions for any reason or no reason, a genetic test result with any kind of abnormality is often a death sentence for the child.<br />
<br />
The Globe and Mail quotes Steve Scherer, a senior scientist at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto and study co-author, &ldquo;The genome is like an accordion that can stretch or shrink . . . so you have no idea what's normal.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We have to think of genetics in an entirely different way. We're actually more like a patchwork of genetic code than bar codes that line up evenly,&rdquo; Dr. Scherer said.<br />
<br />
Disability rights groups and pro-life advocates have decried the practice but most hospitals now offer &ldquo;genetic counselling&rdquo; to give parents the opportunity to abort a child who is deemed to be imperfect. <br />
<br />
Toronto&rsquo;s Mount Sinai hospital, for instance, offers a list of genetic counselling clinics as part of their Family Medicine Genetics Program. Mount Sinai&rsquo;s website says its Genetics Program staff, &ldquo;provide information that helps families make personal decisions about pregnancy and child care.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
&ldquo;A genetic counsellor works with a person or family who may be at risk for inherited disease or an abnormal pregnancy outcome by discussing the chances of having children who are affected.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Mt. Sinai recommends genetic counselling for &ldquo;couples who already have a child with mental retardation, an inherited disorder or a birth defect&hellip; (and) women over the age of 35 who are pregnant or planning to be.&rdquo; This age group has a significantly higher, although still very low percentage chance of conceiving a child with Down syndrome. <br />
<br />
At age 35 the chance of conceiving a Downs child is estimated to be 1 in 400 or one-quarter of one percent of conceptions. At age 40 it becomes 1 percent and for conceptions over age 45 the overall average increases to 4 percent. However, 75 percent of all babies with Down syndrome are born to women under 35. <br />
<br />
Mt Sinai says, &ldquo;When a birth defect is diagnosed, genetic counsellors provide emotional support during what can be a very difficult time. If there are decisions to be made about the pregnancy&hellip;. the parents can make more informed choices with the facts in hand.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Treatment&rdquo; for a prenatal diagnosis of a possible inherited disease or genetic abnormality is often killing the couple&rsquo;s child via abortion.<br />
<br />
The late, famed French geneticist, Dr. Jerome Lejeune first discovered the genetic basis of Down's Syndrome and strongly believed a cure, or more correctly a treatment therapy, was possible for Down&rsquo;s patients in the early stages of their lives. He was however unable to obtain adequate funding for this research and was dismayed that the response to his discovery was to instead use it to search for and destroy unborn children with Down syndrome.   </div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2941</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2941</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Embryonic Stem Cell Research Funding Advocates Claim Enough Votes</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>Two of the leading embryonic stem cell research advocates in Congress say they think they have enough votes in both the House and Senate to override any second veto President Bush may issue on a bill to force taxpayers to pay for the destructive research. </div>
<div>
<div>Congress approved the legislation last year, but President Bush vetoed the bill saying that it's wrong for the federal government to pay for the destruction of human life for research.</div>
<div>Because of the 2006 election, which saw some pro-life lawmakers defeated and replaced with pro-abortion legislators who favor embryonic stem cell research, some activists say they now have enough votes to override a veto.</div>
<div>&quot;I think we have the votes in the Senate to override a veto, and we may have them in the House. I think we can get there,&quot; Sen. Orrin Hatch told the Salt Lake Tribune.</div>
<div>&quot;According to some, we're only a couple votes short, and I think I know where those votes are,&quot; the Republican senator added.</div>
<div>Hatch says he's been working with members of the Bush administration to try to tinker with the wording of the bill with the hope of getting the president to support it.</div>
<div>However, White House spokesman Blair Jones told the newspaper that the president hasn't changed his mind on taxpayer funding for embryonic stem cell research and pointed out that only the use of adult stem cells has actually helped patients.</div>
<div>&quot;Those are facts that cannot be denied,&quot; she said.</div>
<div>&quot;After careful and thoughtful deliberation with government and outside experts, there was only one moral line that the President said that he would not cross -- and that is that federal taxpayer dollars should not be used in the destruction of embryos,&quot; Jones added.</div>
<div>Bush vetoed the previous bill in July and the House voted 235-193 in favor of overriding the veto, but the vote was 51 short of the two-thirds necessary to override it. The Senate voted for the bill 63-37, which was four votes short of being able to override a veto.</div>
<div>Others say there are still not enough votes to override a veto.</div>
<div>Robert Klein, who heads the California agency charged with spending billions on embryonic stem cell research and human cloning there, says he thinks there are enough votes to overturn a veto in the Senate, but not the House.</div>
<div>&quot;Based on their known positions, we have a veto-proof Senate. The challenge will be the House, where we need about 35 votes on the Republican side,&quot; he said.</div>
<div>Meanwhile, Rep. Diana DeGette, a Colorado Democrat who was a leading sponsor of the funding bill in the House, said she has spoken with many of the 41 new Democrats in the chamber.</div>
<div>&quot;To describe them as wildly enthusiastic about this bill would be an understatement,&quot; she told the Tribune. &quot;I think the election really sent a message to Washington that the voters want embryonic stem cell research passed.&quot;</div>
<div>However, polls show the opposite was true.</div>
<div>A post-election poll conducted by Fox News found that, in the Missouri Senate race, which was dominated by embryonic stem cell research, neither the issue nor ads from actor Michael J. Fox helped Claire McCaskill. In fact, the ads benefited pro-life Sen. Jim Talent, who opposed taxpayer funding of the controversial science. </div>
<div>Fox News asked Missouri voters whether the embryonic stem cell research ad campaign made voters more or less likely to vote for McCaskill, who Fox endorsed in the commercials.</div>
<div>A whopping 71 percent said the ads made &quot;No difference&quot; in their vote.</div>
<div>Only 7 percent said the ads made them more likely to support McCaskill but a larger group of voters, 18 percent, said Fox's commercials made them less likely to support her. </div>
<div>Of those voters who said it made them less likely to vote for her some 94 percent ended up supporting pro-life Sen. Jim Talent, who opposed embryonic stem cell research funding. </div>
<div>Polls show Americans aren't clamoring for their tax dollars to pay for the destruction of human life for embryonic stem cell research that has yet to help any patients and may never do so.</div>
<div>A new poll conducted by Newsweek in August showed a decline in the support for taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research. </div>
<div>According to the poll, 48 percent of Americans favor funding embryonic stem cell research with taxpayer funds while 40 percent say they don't.</div>
<div>That eight percent margin is down from an October 2005 Newsweek poll showing a 50-36 percentage split -- or a 14 percent margin. That means support for funding embryonic stem cell research with tax dollars is down 6 percent from late last year.</div>
<div>Other polls show lower support for using taxpayer dollars to pay for embryonic stem cell research.</div>
<div>Conducted by International Communications Research in mid-May, a poll found 48% of Americans oppose federal funding of stem cell research that requires destroying human embryos. Just 39% support such funding and another 12 percent had no position. </div>
<div>The ICR survey found 57% favored funding only the research avenues that do not harm the donor. Just 24% favored funding all stem cell research, including the type that involves destroying human embryos.</div>
<div>Adult stem cells have already produced 70 cures or treatments for various conditions including various cancers such as breast cancer, lymphomas, leukemia, arthritis, heart damage, Parkinsons, Sickle Cell Anemia and other disorders.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2940</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2940</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Lies aren't changing, but impact is, ministry says<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Persecution report says charades no longer working on Christians</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>A report from a worldwide ministry whose leaders focus their attention on persecuted Christians say the lies missionaries in the restrictive nation of North Korea are facing aren't changing, but their impact is.
<div>An extended report by P. Todd Nettleton about the work of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.persecution.com">The Voice of the Martyrs</a> has described the repressive circumstances under which Christians in North Korea live.
<div>The report told of the faith of a teen-ager who was caught teaching about Christ, and died in a North Korean prison camp to leave behind a witness that continues there even today. It also reported on the stunning change in a prison guard who watched that teen's final days and sought out what made the teen strong.
<div>It also reported how a veteran of more than 100 missions inside the restrictive nation works to help other Christians worship, and told the story of a woman who had lost her parents to starvation in North Korea but was given a vision to return and teach the Gospel.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>Now comes confirmation of the aggressive campaign North Korea conducts to mislead its own people.
<div>&quot;Western missionaries eat Korean children&hellip; North Korea is an earthly paradise &hellip; other nations of the world are worse off than us &hellip; Kim Il Sung was a divine being, and his spirit guides the Korean people &hellip; Kim Jong il was born on a holy mountain, and his birth was greeted by rainbows and flowers bursting into bloom.&quot;
<div>&quot;The North Korean government lies to its own people, and to the rest of the world,&quot; the conclusion of the report said. &quot;For more than 50 years it has promoted Juche, (Korean for 'self-reliance') a false trinity consisting of Kim Il Sung, the dead dictator and 'father,' his son Kim Jong il, the current dictator and 'son,' and the 'holy fire' of the Juche ideology,&quot; the group said.
<div>But it's not working any more, even though the charades continue, with two large church buildings in Pyongyang showplaces for tourists &ndash; but sharing the same &quot;choir&quot; of professional singers, the report said.
<div>&quot;More and more, people are rejecting the idea of Juche &hellip; and relying on the salvation promise in the blood of Jesus Christ,&quot; the report said.
<div>In house after house, where Christians meet under the mandatory portraits of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong il, &quot;many come to know Christ,&quot; VOM said.
<div>&quot;We are committed and privileged to stand with our brothers and sisters as long as the brutal regime of Kim Jong il stands against them,&quot; the organization said. &quot;As we equip, encourage and support them, we know we will also stand with them in front of the throne in eternity. The recipe for victory in this eternal battle will not involve tanks, planes or guns. All that is needed is more Pencils.&quot;
<div>&quot;Pencil&quot; was the pseudonym adopted by one of the missionaries profiled by VOM, a teen who feared for his life, but nevertheless went into North Korea carrying a Bible and testifying about his Christian faith.
<div>His actions earned him a terminal sentence to a North Korean prison camp, where after his death a guard sought out some local Christians to obtain what had made that teen so strong.
<div>&quot;The courageous believers we work with in North Korea all have something in common &ndash; even when they have an opportunity to be free, they choose to take true Freedom to others inside the hermit kingdom,&quot; the report said.
<div>VOM is a non-profit, interdenominational ministry working worldwide to help Christians who are persecuted for their faith, and to educate the world about that persecution. Its headquarters are in Bartlesville, Okla., and it has 30 affiliated international offices.
<div>It was launched by the late Richard and Sabina Wurmbrand, who started smuggling Russian Gospels into Russia in 1947, just months before Richard was abducted and imprisoned in Romania where he was tortured for his refusal to recant Christianity.
<div>He eventually was released in 1964 and the next year he testified about the persecution of Christians before the U.S. Senate's Internal Security Subcommittee, stripping to the waist to show the deep torture wound scars on his body.
<div>The group that later was renamed The Voice of the Martyrs was organized in 1967, when his book, &quot;Tortured for Christ,&quot; was released. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2939</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2939</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">House to Consider Pain to Preborn Caused by Abortion</font></strong></div>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>Last chance to pass the legislation before Democrats take over.</em>
<div>
<div>When the U.S. House reconvenes in December, lawmakers will take up a key initiative on the pain felt by preborn babies during an abortion. </div>
<div>The bill was introduced by Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., in 2004. The bill was drawn up after expert testimony on the federal partial-birth abortion ban highlighted that babies can feel pain in the womb as early as 20-weeks gestation -- or perhaps even earlier. The legislation would require doctors to inform women seeking an abortion there's evidence the baby can feel pain and to offer pain-reducing medication for the preborn child.</div>
<div>Doctors failing to comply with the law would be fined and have their licenses revoked. </div>
<div>Because of the way it will be voted on, it will require a two-thirds majority to pass. While pro-life experts say it's unlikely the measure will make it to the Senate floor before Democrats take control in January, it's still regarded an important vote.</div>
<div>Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, said while the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act would not fare well in the upcoming Democrat-controlled Congress, it raises awareness of an important issue.</div>
<div>&quot;This piece of legislation simply allows women to have full information so that she can decide if she wants to go through with something that first does kill a child and second it will cause excruciating pain to her child,&quot; she told Family News in Focus. &quot;Even though the Democrats will be in control, that doesn't relieve us as citizens from our duty. And our duty is to let them know what they ought to be addressing. This is an important bill that Congress, no matter who's in control, should be addressing.&quot;</div>
<div>If the bill isn't passed by both chambers before January, it will have to start over in the new Democrat-led Congress.</div>
<div>Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats for Life, said she's holding out hope that moderate Blue Dog Dems will make a difference.</div>
<div>&quot;We will still have a pro-life majority in the next Congress,&quot; she said. &quot;We'll continue to pass pro-life legislation because of that majority.&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2938</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2938</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font face="Palatino," color="#000000" size="+2">'Destroy America' hidden in puzzle</font><br />
<font face="Palatino," color="#000000" size="+1">Teacher quits after placing message in word-search calling on Allah to annihilate 'evil-sponsoring U.S.'</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>A high-school Spanish teacher has resigned his position after placing hidden messages inside a word-search puzzle calling on Allah to destroy America, which he called the &quot;body of evil that is making human life so miserable.&quot;
<div>Khalid Chahhou, 35, a native of Morocco who was a first-year language instructor at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://johnstoncounty.nc.schoolwebpages.com/education/school/school.php?sectiondetailid=6315&amp;sc_id=1157983661">Smithfield-Selma High School</a> in North Carolina, quit after a student deciphered the anti-U.S. message which also voiced support for terrorists.
<div>The secret message, when put together, read: &quot;Sharon killed a lot of innocent people in Palestine. Hamas is not a terrorist group. They have the right to defend their country. This is something that forms part of our freedom and dignity. Allah help destroy this body of evil that is making human life so miserable. Destroy America, a country where evil is sponsored.&quot;
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;We were concerned quite a bit,&quot; school board member Larry Strickland told the Smithfield Herald. &quot;This is something that our school system would not and does not tolerate.&quot;
<div>Fred Bartholomew, chairman of the school board, said even though Chahhou resigned, he might not escape judgment, as legal options are being considered.
<div>&quot;We'll let our investigation run its course and then see what we have to do,&quot; he said.
<div>When contacted by the Raleigh News &amp; Observer, Chahhou confirmed the incident, but otherwise had little comment.
<div>&quot;I don't want to talk about this dark page in my life any more,&quot; Chahhou said.
<div>Sophomore Chris McDaniels told the Observer the word search caught his attention because it was handwritten; they were usually typed.
<div>&quot;I think some of the people in the class were kind of afraid, because how the world is today, you never know with people,&quot; McDaniels said. &quot;Even if you've known them for a while, they could turn out to be someone completely different.&quot;
<div>His mother, Carla McDaniels, wondered how someone having what they see as extremist tendencies landed in a public class, where such views could be broadcast to students.
<div>&quot;With him resigning, who's to say he's not going to go to another school district to do the same thing?&quot; she asked.
<div>Shakil Ahmed, president of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.carymasjid.org/">Islamic Association of Cary</a>, N.C., said Chahhou told him he created the puzzle when he was upset after viewing news reports of deaths of Palestinians at the hands of Israeli troops.
<div>&quot;He must have gone through an outburst of emotions at that time,&quot; Ahmed told the News &amp; Observer.
<div>Ahmed said Chahhou is a mild-mannered man, who has taught Arabic and religious studies to children at a mosque of about 200 members since he moved to the local area five months ago.
<div>&quot;He's the most softest-spoken, most gentle, kindest person I've come across,&quot; said Ahmed, adding Chahhou was embarrassed by his actions. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2937</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2937</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Does the MTV Generation Lack the Pilgrim Spirit?</strong>
<div>The Declaration of Independence says we have the right to pursue it, and some people seem obsessed with finding it.  Nevertheless, a new survey indicates that many young people in America are not happy, even though they often live in spacious homes surrounded by every conceivable plaything.  </div>
<div>Believe it or not, the newly released &quot;Wellbeing&quot; study was conducted by MTV International.  MTV surveyed 5,200 young people (8-34) in fourteen countries, asking them questions about their self-perceived wellbeing: how they feel about the future, their safety, and their place in society.  One aspect of the study was to look at how happy and optimistic young people felt in each of the different countries.</div>
<div>MTV said in a press release that the results of the survey were &quot;counter-intuitive&quot;.  By wide margins, poorer children in developing nations rated themselves happier than richer children in prosperous nations.  </div>
<div>In Argentina and Mexico, for example, 60% of young people between the ages of 16-34 identified themselves as happy, and over 80% of children aged 8-15 said they were happy.  Likewise, 60% of India's youth told researchers they were happy.  Compare that to young people in the &quot;developed&quot; world.  In the <span id="lw_1164287204_0">United States</span> and the <span id="lw_1164287204_1">United Kingdom</span>, less than 30% of young adults aged 16-34, and less than 50% of children 8-15, said they were happy.  The situation in <span id="lw_1164287204_2">Japan</span> is even worse; only eight percent acknowledged that they were happy. </div>
<div>It should not surprise anyone to learn that there was a clear correlation in the study between one's religious faith and their happiness: &quot;Young people in the developing world were more religious, and there was a correlation between youth who were actively religious and happiness levels. Over half of 16-34 year-old Indonesians, Brazilians and Indians said they were religious, compared to one in four in the <span id="lw_1164287204_3">USA</span> and one in 10 in <span id="lw_1164287204_4">Sweden</span> and <span id="lw_1164287204_5">Germany</span>.&quot;  The survey found that in <span id="lw_1164287204_6">Japan</span>, where young people are the least happy, 76% said they were &quot;faithless.&quot; </div>
<div>The MTV study clearly shows that young people in America and across the developed world are not as happy as those boys and girls who live in the less prosperous developing world.  For all the time some Americans spend obsessing over the material wellbeing of their children, for all the money spent on &quot;self-esteem&quot; classes trying to persuade them to be happy with themselves, children are less and less content.  The empirical data reaffirms what we've known all along: money can't buy happiness. </div>
<div>Perhaps we should spend some time in America truly reflecting on the question: what is the good life?  What is a happy life?  There is no better time for such reflection than the week of Thanksgiving.  Even though they were facing a long winter in a strange place, the Pilgrims set aside time for Thanksgiving, and this attitude, I am sure, was key to their happiness.  In modern America, and across much of the modern developed world, we do not give thanks in the way the Pilgrims did, even on Thanksgiving.  How many of us live in a spirit of gratitude, with humble appreciation for the many blessings God has given us? </div>
<div>It is so easy for us to take what we have for granted, and though we have more modern conveniences and technological marvels than even the richest kings and queens in years past, we are less happy.  The MTV survey indicates that this lack of happiness might be tied to job security and pressure to succeed.  While these are probably factors, they hardly seem primary.  The basis of such discontent is likely to be found at a deeper level: it involves a fundamental uncertainty about the meaning of life and the source of true happiness.  The pilgrims did not suffer from such uncertainty, and for that reason they joyfully gave thanks to God even as a long cold winter loomed before them.  They knew that their future was in God's hands, and with that conviction they were free to joyfully celebrate the harvest and their many blessings. </div>
<div>This Thanksgiving, my prayer is that all Americans would come together with a Pilgrim spirit, in an attitude of joy and thankfulness for the blessings bestowed on us by our Creator.  The MTV survey is an incredible reminder that what we buy our children will not really contribute to their long-term happiness.  If, however, we impart to them a spirit of humble gratitude and love for God they will undoubtedly experience the happiness and joy that eludes so many others. </div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2936</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2936</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Repeat Abortions in the US on the Rise; Now Half of All Abortions</strong>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<br />
</div>
<div><strong>New York, NY (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>Repeat abortions used to account for about 40 percent of all abortions in the United States, but a new study from the Alan Guttmacher Institute shows that figure is on the rise. Now, about half of every abortion done annually is an abortion done on a woman who has had at least one previous abortion.
<div>The study from AGI, the research arm of Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion business, examined the abortions done on women in 2002.</div>
<div>AGI said the typical profile of a woman having a repeat abortion is someone over the age of 30 who already has children and was using contraception at the time of the pregnancy.</div>
<div>Women seeking repeat abortions were also mostly lower-income women and 60 percent already had at least one child.</div>
<div>The research group relied on different surveys from both government and private groups to compile its research report and it indicated that one government survey of abortions from 2001-2002 showed 48 percent of women having repeat abortions.</div>
<div>Rachel Jones, a senior research associate on the study, told Reuters that the AGI survey &quot;suggests that we need to do a better job helping all women better prevent unwanted pregnancies, so they can avoid having to decide whether to seek abortions or raise children they are not prepared for.&quot;</div>
<div>The survey also showed that one in three women had given birth to a baby in an unplanned pregnancy and 10 percent of all women had more than one unintended birth.</div>
<div>Sharon Camp, the president and CEO of AGI, told Reuters, that the solution to the repeat abortion problem was more abortions.</div>
<div>Camp urged promoting abortion businesses so abortion practitioners could tell women about contraception use after they have an abortion -- even thought most women having repeat abortions were using contraception at the time.</div>
<div>She also claimed the Bush administration's &quot;wall of separation&quot; between family planning clinics and abortion centers led to more abortions.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2935</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2935</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Pro-Life Law Firm to Defend Abortion Protesters Harassed at Super Bowl<br />
<br />
<br />
Detroit, MI (LifeNews.com) -- A leading pro-life law firm has announced it will step up to defend a handful of pro-life protesters who say local police harassed them as they protested abortion outside the Super Bowl this year. </h3>
<div>
<div>Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund filed suit today against Detroit police for violating the free speech rights of six pro-life supporters, all of whom who say they were harassed and later prevented from expressing their views at the football championship.</div>
<div>After learning of the plans to demonstrate on the February 5 event, police told the protesters to move to the other side of the street they planned to use -- a less visible position.</div>
<div>They were later told by a second officer that they would be restricted to a traffic island. Signs critical of abortion were confiscated after the group refused officers&rsquo; demands to turn them around.</div>
<div>&ldquo;Detroit police need to be reminded that free speech is the right of all Americans, not just a select few,&rdquo; said ADF-allied attorney Ted Hoppe. &ldquo;They clearly acted in violation of the Constitution when they chose to single out and squelch pro-life speech.&rdquo; </div>
<div>Police also towed away a car bearing pictures of aborted children and impounded it for two days. Officers refused to provide their names and badge numbers when the protesters requested them.</div>
<div>The protesters also said that police did not treat other people protesting other political issues in the same manner.</div>
<div>ADF filed the legal complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and the case is Marcavage v. City of Detroit.</div>
<div>&ldquo;It is truly disturbing when officers of the law must be re-educated about the tenets of the Constitution,&rdquo; Hoppe said. </div>
<div>&ldquo;Whether certain speech is considered &lsquo;popular&rsquo; or not is entirely irrelevant. Their harassment of these individuals, who were acting peacefully in exercising their First Amendment rights, must be rectified and prevented from occurring in the future,&quot; he concluded.</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2934</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2934</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<ul><font size="-1"></font></ul>
    <center>
    <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="145" align="center" border="0">
        <tbody>
            <tr>
                <td width="10"><img height="1" width="10" alt="" src="http://christiananswers.net/0.gif" /><br />
                </td>
                <td width="135"><img height="98" alt="Abraham Lincoln statute, Lincoln Memorial, Washington, D.C. Photo courtesy of Wallbuilders." width="135" border="0" src="http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/lincolnstatue.jpg" /> </td>
            </tr>
        </tbody>
    </table>
    <img height="31" alt="Proclamation of Thanksgiving" width="360" vspace="10" border="0" src="http://christiananswers.net/q-wall/proclamation.jpg" /><br />
    by the President of the United States of America<br />
    </center><br />
    <font color="#bf8f00" size="+2"><strong>T</strong></font>he year that is drawing toward its close has been filled with the blessings of fruitful years and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the Source from which they come, others have been added which are of so extraordinary a nature that they can not fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever-watchful providence of Almighty God.
    <p>In the midst of a civil war of unequaled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign states to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere, except in the theater of military conflict, while that theater has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union. </p>
    <p>Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the field of peaceful industry to the national defense have not arrested the plow, the shuttle, or the ship; the ax has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than theretofore. Population has steadily increased notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege, and the battlefield, and the country, rejoicing in the consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom. </p>
    <p>No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy. </p>
    <p>It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently, and gratefully acknowledged, as with one heart and one voice, by the whole American people. I do therefore invite my fellow-citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next as a day of thanksgiving and praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, <a href="http://christiananswers.net/dictionary/orphans.html">orphans</a>, mourners, or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it, as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes, to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility, and union. </p>
    <p>In testimony wherof I have herunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. </p>
    <div>[Signed]<br />
    A. Lincoln</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2899</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2899</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>What is the Origin of Thanksgiving Day?<br />
</h3>
<h3><font face="Times, Times New Roman" color="#cc6600" size="+3"><strong>T</strong></font>he Pilgrims left Plymouth, England, on September 6, 1620. Their destination? The New World. Although filled with uncertainty and peril, it offered both civil and religious liberty.</h3>
<p>For over two months, the 102 passengers braved the harsh elements of a vast storm-tossed sea. Finally, with firm purpose and a reliance on Divine Providence, the cry of &quot;Land!&quot; was heard. </p>
<p>Arriving in Massachusetts in late November, the Pilgrims sought a suitable landing place. On December 11, just before disembarking at Plymouth Rock, they signed the &quot;Mayflower Compact&quot; - America's first document of civil government and the first to introduce self-government.</p>
<p><img class="photoright" height="119" alt="Pumpkins. Photo copyrighted." width="130" border="0" src="http://christiananswers.net/q-wall/pumpkin.jpg" /> After a prayer service, the Pilgrims began building hasty shelters. However, unprepared for the starvation and sickness of a harsh New England winter, nearly half died before spring. Yet, persevering in prayer, and assisted by helpful Indians, they reaped a bountiful harvest the following summer.</p>
<p>The grateful Pilgrims then declared a three-day feast, starting on December 13, 1621, to thank God and to celebrate with their Indian friends. While this was not the first Thanksgiving in America (thanksgiving services were held in Virginia as early as 1607), it was America's first Thanksgiving Festival.</p>
<p><img class="photoright" height="184" alt="Artist's depiction of the first Thanksgiving. Courtesy of Eden Communications." width="250" border="0" src="http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/thanksgiving-feast2.jpg" /> Pilgrim Edward Winslow described the Pilgrims' Thanksgiving in these words:</p>
<p> </p>
<h3><blockquote>
<p><font face="Times, Times New Roman"><strong>&quot;Our harvest being gotten in, our Governor sent four men on fowling</strong> [bird hunting] <strong>so that we might, after a special manner, rejoice together after we had gathered the fruit of our labors. They four in one day killed as much fowl as... served the company almost a week... Many of the Indians </strong>[came] <strong>amongst us and... their greatest King, Massasoit, with some ninety men, whom for three days we entertained and feasted; and they went out and killed five deer, which they brought... And although it be not always so plentiful as it was at this time with us, yet BY THE GOODNESS OF GOD WE ARE... FAR FROM WANT.&quot;</strong></font></p>
</blockquote></h3>
<p><img class="photoleft" height="101" alt="George Washington, first President of the United States. Photo courtesy of Eden Communications." width="97" border="0" src="http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/washington-geo.jpg" /> <!--added from The WallBuilder Report Fall 1998--><font color="#cc6600">In 1789, following a proclamation issued by President George Washington, America celebrated its first Day of Thanksgiving to God</font> under its new constitution. That same year, the Protestant Episcopal Church, of which President Washington was a member, announced that the first Thursday in November would become its regular day for giving thanks, &quot;unless another day be appointed by the civil authorities.&quot; Yet, despite these early national proclamations, official Thanksgiving observances usually occurred only at the State level. </p>
<p><font color="#cc6600">Much of the credit for the adoption of a later ANNUAL national Thanksgiving Day may be attributed to Mrs. Sarah Joseph Hale</font>, the editor of <em>Godey's Lady's Book</em>. For thirty years, she promoted the idea of a national Thanksgiving Day, contacting President after President until <font color="#cc6600">President Abraham Lincoln responded in 1863 by setting aside the last Thursday of November as a national Day of Thanksgiving.</font> Over the next seventy-five years, Presidents followed Lincoln's precedent, annually declaring a national Thanksgiving Day. Then, <font color="#cc6600">in 1941, Congress <em>permanently</em> established the fourth Thursday of each November as a national holiday.</font></p>
<p><img class="photoright" height="98" alt="Abraham Lincoln statute, Lincoln Memorial, Washington, D.C. Photo courtesy of Wallbuilders." width="135" border="0" src="http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/lincolnstatue.jpg" /> Lincoln's original <a href="http://christiananswers.net/q-wall/wal-alincoln-tgiving.html">1863 Thanksgiving Proclamation</a> came - spiritually speaking - at a pivotal point in his life. During the first week of July of that year, the Battle of Gettysburg occurred, resulting in the loss of some 60,000 American lives. Four months later in November, Lincoln delivered his famous &quot;Gettsysburg Address.&quot; It was while Lincoln was walking among the thousands of graves there at Gettysburg that he committed his life to Christ. As he explained to a friend:<br />
</p>
<ul>
    <p><font face="Times, Times New Roman"><strong>When I left Springfield [to assume the Presidency] I asked the people to pray for me. I was not a Christian. When I buried my son, the severest trial of my life, I was not a Christian. But when I went to Gettysburg and saw the graves of thousands of our soldiers, I then and there consecrated myself to Christ.</strong><br />
    </font></p>
</ul>
<p>As Americans celebrate Thanksgiving each year, we hope they will retain the original gratefulness to God displayed by the Pilgrims <!--added-->and many other founding fathers <!--end added-->, and remember that it is to those early and courageous Pilgrims that they owe not only the traditional Thanksgiving holiday but also the concepts of self-government, the &quot;hard-work&quot; ethic, self-reliant communities, and devout religious faith. </p>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2898</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2898</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Persecution reports say Syrian Christians not 'free'<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Megapastor Rick Warren had reported faith in Jesus 'legal' in Muslim nation</font><br />
<div>
<div><font size="+0"><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>California megachurch pastor Rick Warren, author of &quot;The Purpose-Driven Life,&quot; says when he visited Syria recently he saw that Christians and Jews are facing a near-routine existence, with some privileges that even Muslims don't receive, within a governmental structure that formally allows for faith in Christ and adherence to the Torah.
<div>However, a U.S. State Department report on religious persecution worldwide notes that while Christianity and Judaism are legal, the Syrian government monitors sermons and fundraising and discourages public proselytizing. Jews are banned from government employment and are singled out as the only religious minority whose passports and identity cards identify their religion. They also must obtain permission of security services before traveling abroad and must submit a list of possessions to ensure they return.
<div>Other groups cite Syrian as a &quot;restricted&quot; nation for Christians and one posts Syria in the top four dozen worst violators of religious freedoms worldwide.
<div>&quot;The constitution provides for freedom of religion; however, the Government imposes restrictions on this right,&quot; the 2006 <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71432.htm">report from the U.S. State Department</a> said. &quot;Foreign missionary groups were present but operated discreetly.&quot;
<div>Warren, who had visited with religious and political leaders in Syria, and was quoted by the state-run news agency SANA as praising Syria for its leadership, said in a statement that &quot;many Americans don't realize that both Christianity and Judaism are legal in Syria. In addition, the government provides free electricity and water to all churches; allows pastors to purchase a car tax-free (a tax break not given to Muslim imams); appoints pastors as Christian judges to handle Christian cases; and allows Christians to create their own civil law instead of having to follow Muslim law.&quot;
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>The State Department clarified that a little. The utilities and water are free, and there is &quot;de facto&quot; separation of religion and the state. But during the current reporting period the &quot;Government sometimes encouraged negative &ndash; even violent &ndash; expressions of Islamic religious sentiment.&quot;
<div>&quot;The clearest example of this occurred on Feb. 4, 2006, when the Government allowed Muslim groups to demonstrate publicly against the publication of the (Prophet Muhammad) cartoons, and later failed to control a mob of several thousand Muslim protesters that attacked and set fire to the building housing the Danish, Swedish, and Chilean embassies, and later set fire to the Norwegian Embassy,&quot; the State Department said.
<div>The government-owned newspaper also launched a section focusing on Islamic views and fatwas (Islamic religious judgments), and the president signed a decree setting up a sharia law faculty at Aleppo University.
<div>Government agencies also have clamped down on two outside groups that separately distributed a book challenging the practice of Muslim women wearing a headscarf and wanted to do research on the use of Islamic religious law.
<div>In the past, the government also has banned Jehovah's Witnesses.
<div>&quot;Security services were constantly alert for any possible political threat to the State, and all groups, religious and nonreligious, were subject to surveillance and monitoring by government security services,&quot; the report said.
<div>All citizens, Muslim, Christian or otherwise, are subject to the &quot;sharia-based personal status laws regulating child custody, inheritance, and adoption.&quot; And the government regulates the religious instruction classes which are required for all students in schools.
<div>Incidents of torture reported by the State Department were against alleged Islamists in detention, the report said. Missionaries who are &quot;posing a threat to the relations among religious groups&quot; are subject to charges that carry prison sentences from five years to life.
<div>The report did note that David Duke, former national director of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, took part in a mass solidarity protest in Damascus, and his speech was aired on Syrian national television praising President Bashar al-Asad.
<div>While Warren was visiting Syria, he was quoted by the SANA state news agency that:
<div>
<ul>
    <li>&quot;Pastor Warren hailed the religious coexistence, tolerance and stability that the Syrian society is enjoying due to the wise leadership of President al-Assad, asserting that he will convey the true image about Syria to the American people.&quot; </li>
    <li>&quot;Syria wants peace, and Muslims and Christians live in this country jointly and peacefully since more than a thousand years, and this is not new for Syria.&quot; </li>
    <li>Warren told Syria's Islamic grand mufti there could be no peace in the region without Syria and 80 percent of Americans reject the U.S. administration's policies and actions in Iraq.</li>
</ul>
<div>The comments attributed to Warren contradicted documentation by the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ict.org.il/inter_ter/st_terror/syrian_terror.htm">International Counter Terrorism organization</a> and U.S. State Department of Syria's extensive use of terrorism for its political goals.
<div>The ICT said &quot;frequent use of the 'terror weapon' has been made by Syria against Lebanon, Jordan and the Palestinians&quot; in an attempt &quot;to impose Syrian hegemony over them and bring them into line with Syrian policy.&quot;
<div>SANA's statements about Warren's visit were reported by WND after several unsuccessful attempts to reach Warren, or anyone with his church organization, for a comment. He later did contact WND and disavowed the comments.
<div>In an e-mail to WND Editor Joseph Farah, who criticized Warren's decision to travel to Syria and mingle with its leaders in a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52969">daily column</a>, Warren wrote: &quot;Joseph, why didn't you contact me first and discover the fact I said nothing of the sort? The trip was a favor to my next-door neighbor, had nothing to do with policy, and was done with the State Department's knowledge.&quot;
<div>Warren added that the State Department had warned him &quot;to expect exactly what Syria did &ndash; a PT blast. I don't pretend to be a diplomat. I'm a pastor who just gets invited places.&quot;
<div>However, in a video posted on YouTube but removed when the WND story was released, titled &quot;Building Bridges,&quot; Warren is shown walking down a Damascus street commenting on political and social life in Syria, saying Christians and Muslims get along with each other.
<div>&quot;It's a moderate country, and the official government role and position is to not allow any extremism of any kind,&quot; Warren says.
<div>Now Warren has wrapped up his trip, and has sent a message to his Saddleback Church congregation about his return, including a news release that was generated by the controversy over the SANA quotes.
<div>&quot;Contrary to reports by the official state-controlled Syrian news agency, Dr. Warren was in Syria to meet with and encourage the country's key Christian leaders; dialogue with top Muslim leaders; and promote religious freedom,&quot; the statement said.
<div>&quot;In hindsight, I wish we'd been better prepared for our visit to Syria,&quot; he said. &quot;We would have a handled some meetings differently, watched our words more close, and been more aware of the agenda of their state press.&quot;
<div>While Syria is not listed among the ten 10 or even 20 nations that violate religious rights worldwide, it is listed at No. 47 on the Open Doors World Watch list, published by <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.opendoorsusa.org">Open Doors USA,</a> the ministry to the persecuted Christian church launched by Brother Andrew, who smuggled Bibles behind the Iron Curtain during the Cold War.
<div>And <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://persecution.org">The Voice of the Martyrs</a> noted that all religious groups must register with the Syrian government, are monitored by the government and must obtain a special permit to meet for anything other than a regular worship service.
<div>VOM spokesman Todd Nettleton said Syria is considered a &quot;restricted&quot; nation because although there are some freedoms, there is virtually no freedom for a Muslim to convert to Christianity.
<div>&quot;There is persecution, primarily from within the family, when a Muslim chooses to convert,&quot; he told WND.
<div>One such case, as reported by <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.worldmag.com/articles/12405">WORLD magazine,</a> involved Samer, a Jordanian man who converted from Islam to Christianity, and was arrested on Aug. 22 by Syrian police on no defined charges.
<div>It wasn't until Oct. 10 he was released from prison, and he immediately fled to the United States.
<div>&quot;Many countries of the Middle East have a good image here in the U.S., but their rules are not what Americans think&hellip; When [Islamic countries] talk about human rights and freedom, it's not true &ndash; unless you remain in Islam,&quot; he told the magazine.
<div>&quot;The Syrian government has long had a bad reputation in America, but if one considers a positive action like welcoming in thousands of Christian refugees from Iraq, or the protection of freedom to worship for Christians and Jews in Syria, it should not be ignored,&rdquo; Warren said from Rwanda.
<div>The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom said in a report that Christians in some parts of Syria report that the government has &quot;confiscated their property &hellip; without compensation and &hellip; Assyrian Christians also alleged that the Kurdish Democratic Party-dominated judiciary routinely discriminated against non-Muslims.&quot;
<div>Warren told his congregation he went to Syria at the invitation of his neighbor, and because of arrangements his neighbor, Yassar, made, met some key Christian and Muslim leaders as well as government leaders.
<div>&quot;As we left, the official state-controlled Syrian news agency issued some press releases that sounded like I was a politician negotiating the Iraq war by praising the Syrian President and everything else in Syria! Of course, that's ridiculous, but it created a stir among bloggers who tend to editorialize before verifying the truth.
<div>&quot;Does it seem ironic to you that people who distrust Syria now believe Syrian press releases?&quot; he asked.
<div>&quot;Friends, I am aware that inaccuracies, misquotes, and misperceived motivations get reported about me in the press daily. Most of the time, I just ignore them. Jesus said, 'If the world hates you, remember that it hated me first.' (John 15:18 &ndash; NCV)&quot; Warren wrote.
<div>&quot;Just don't believe everything you read on the Internet or hear in the media,&quot; he wrote.
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.saddleback.com/flash/story.asp">Saddleback Church</a>, with 30,000 members, was begun by Rick and Kay Warren in 1979 and now has more than 200 ministries in the Orange County area.
<div>His popular book, which has sold about 12 million copies, focuses on worship, fellowship, discipleship, ministry and evangelism. It tells readers the life is &quot;not about you,&quot; and shows how God can enable each one to live for His purposes.
<div>Warren is scheduled to preach in North Korea next year. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2895</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2895</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Wal-Mart relents,boycott called off<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Family advocates claim victory as retailer says <br />
it won't give to controversial issues like 'gays'</font><br />
<div>
<div><font size="+0">
<div>
<div>
<div>The <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.afa.net">American Family Association</a> is dropping its planned boycott of Wal-Mart for Friday, the biggest shopping day of the year, after the corporation said it would clean up its corporate relationships.
<div>&quot;Respect for the individual is one of the core values that have made us into the company we are today. We take pride in the fact that we treat every customer, every supplier and every member of our individual communities fairly and equally,&quot; the company said in a statement on <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.walmartfacts.com/articles/4617.aspx">its Wal-Mart Facts</a> website late today.
<div>&quot;Wal-Mart will not make corporate contributions to support or oppose highly controversial issues unless they directly relate to our ability to serve our customers,&quot; the company said.
<div>The AFA immediately suggested to its constituents, who had been asked to boycott the retailer on what often is the single-most important day for retailers in their fiscal year, that they send the company a 'Thank you.'
<div>&quot;You have made a difference!&quot; the AFA said. &quot;(We) are pleased with this announcement.&quot;
<div>The family-friendly association, along with other groups, had launched the protest campaign because of Wal-Mart's new affiliation with the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce, and several other actions families viewed as less-than-friendly.
<div>&quot;Wal-Mart does not have a position on same sex marriage and we do not give preference to gay or lesbian suppliers. Wal-Mart does have a strong commitment to diversity among our associates and against discrimination everywhere,&quot; the company said.
<div>&quot;We are working hard to make our corporate contributions reflect the values of our customers, communities, and associates. As Sam Walton said, 'Each Wal-Mart store should reflect the values of its customers and support the vision they hold for their community,&quot; the company statement said.
<div>AFA officials said because of the company's announcement, they would no longer encourage people to not shop at Wal-Mart or Sam's Club Friday and Saturday. Those days immediately after Thanksgiving often mean the difference between a good year or bad for a retailer.
<div>&quot;We believe that Wal-Mart will remain neutral in cultural battles,&quot; the AFA statement said.
<div>The association, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52898">as WND reported,</a> was among the first of several to issue calls intended to get the attention of the retail chain.
<div>Just in the past few days, another group decided to launching an &quot;information explosion&quot; intended to tell the tens of millions of customers at Wal-Mart Friday that some of their dollars will be going to support a group that works to discriminate against Christians with &quot;hate crimes&quot; legislation and wants marriage expanded to involve same-sex couples.
<div>&quot;We're out to help an old friend. Wal-Mart has been a friend of ours for a long, long time,&quot; said Flip Benham, the director of Operation Save America who is working to help coordinate the new efforts by the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.savewalmart.com/">www.SaveWalMart.com</a> outreach.
<div>The AFA had said its boycott effort was to wake Wal-Mart up.
<div>
<div>&quot;Wal-Mart should remember that the majority of people in this country do not support things like same-sex marriage, and don't want the company giving money to groups that do support it,&quot; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.afa.net">American Family Association</a> Chairman Donald E. Wildmon said earlier. &quot;Shopping at retailers other than Wal-Mart might remind the company of that fact.&quot;
<div>The SaveWalMart.com plan was launched with a different agenda. It is to approach customers directly, to let them know about the company's moral agenda, and to bring people together in a series of events that will convince the company to return to the values of founder Sam Walton.
<div>Those were described in a recent WND column by Pat Boone, who knew Walton personally.
<div>In his <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53016">commentary, Boone told how he met with Walton,</a> and at Walton's request offered ideas on how to feature gospel music in his stores.
<div>&quot;Already at more than 4,000 stores, his music department offered most everything, and he was personally concerned that some of it was anything <em>but</em> family friendly. Increasingly, he would be informed by customers that a number of albums contained profanity, strong and explicit sexual material, angry and violent imagery, all kinds of stuff he didn't want to sell anybody &ndash; but he didn't know what to do about it, since neither he nor his employees had time to listen to all the records the national distributors would place in his racks,&quot; Boone wrote.
<div>He than told Walton about the Parents Music Resource Committee, which checked lyric contents and lobbied to have recording companies print the lyrics on the outside of the records or put advisories on the packaging.
<div>Walton loved it, Boone reported. &quot;It was responsible; it was family friendly. It was right &ndash; simply the right thing to do.&quot;
<div>&quot;We are not protesting. We are proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ,&quot; says the SaveWalMart organization website about Friday's plans.
<div>The plans are to have people choose the Wal-Mart nearest either their home or church on Friday, and be there all day to hand out information about the developments involving the company.
<div>&quot;If you have a portable sound system, let the preacher boys proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ on it! We are a Gospel people! As always, we are going out because we love Wal-Mart and want to see the corporation turn back to the Christian ethic of its founder, Sam Walton,&quot; the website instructs.
<div>Benham said so far there are plans to demonstrate against the &quot;satan-inspired&quot; agenda at &quot;hundreds&quot; of the stores across the nation. He said it is &quot;foolish&quot; for a company even such as Wal-Mart to drive away an entire classification of customers.
<div>However, he said it's a situation almost like blackmail or extortion. He called it &quot;demonic&quot; for its reach well beyond what logic could allow.
<div>In one city, for example, Benham's workers offered a regional newspaper nearly $17,000 for an ad about its campaign, nearly double the routine $8,500 for such an ad, he said. The newspaper turned down the ad, which included statements such as, &quot;God blessed Wal-Mart because founder Sam Walton chose to honor Jesus Christ and run his business according to biblical principles!&quot;
<div>The ad, which also has been prepared as a handout for people to give away on Friday, also said customers should &quot;ask your local Wal-Mart Store Manager&quot; about the changing moral values, and either call Wal-Mart or e-mail the company about the concerns.
<div>&quot;Wal-Mart is changing! It is departing from the rock from which it was hewn. The faith and love for Jesus Christ and His Word by Sam Walton, the founder of Wal-Mart, is being trashed before our very eyes,&quot; the ad says.
<div>The facts it cites are basic. Wal-Mart recently joined the National Gay &amp; Lesbian Chamber of Commerce, contributing at least $25,000 to the cause with promises to sponsor various homosexual events.
<div>Benham told WND that the information campaign was a beginning.
<div>&quot;Our hope is that thousands and thousands and thousands of people will be put on notice as to what is happening in Wal-Mart,&quot; he said.
<div>Boone noted that he was shocked when the company agreed to donate a percentage of its online sales directly to a Washington, D.C., community for homosexuals.
<div>&quot;The man I knew was a conscientious deacon at the Methodist church, and his own family are wonderful people, still honoring their mom, Helen,&quot; Boone wrote. &quot;He was a rock ribbed 'traditional values' guy&hellip;&quot;
<div>&quot;The devil is forcing our schools, businesses, government, and churches to honor those things which are an abomination to God. Christians must take a stand! It&rsquo;s time for our theology to become biography in the streets! It&rsquo;s time for us to come out of the closet!&quot; the information campaign website says.
<div>&quot;We are not a protest. We are a proclamation that Jesus Christ is Lord! Wal-Mart can be saved and so can America. It begins with God&rsquo;s Church!&quot; the website said.
<div>Wal-Mart, after confirming to WND that it did establish a relationship with the homosexual business group, has been focusing on &quot;diversity&quot; in responses to people concerned about the company's moral drift.
<div>To Pastor Rick Barnard's note that he couldn't support such a company, Wal-Mart said, &quot;Working with the NGLCC, as we do with other minority enterprise leaders, is our way to help educate corporate America and the public as to the economic benefits of a diverse workplace and the power of creating mutually beneficial relationships with the LGBT and the LGBT-friendly business community.&quot;
<div>Florida customer Lawrence Reves said he supported Wal-Mart &quot;when the Democrats targeted you, but THIS is something I can not consciously continue to do.&quot;
<div>&quot;Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s commitment to nondiscrimination underscores our understanding of and appreciation for diversity, as well as the growth and influence of emerging consumer markets in the United States, including the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community,&quot;' the company responded.
<div>&quot;American businesses &hellip; are being blackmailed by the devil himself. They are being forced by the 'politically correct' dogma (abortion, homosexuality, etc) of our day to accept his terms. If one chooses to defy this dogma, he will be forever branded as a right-wing, bigoted fascist, bent on forcing his own religion (Christianity) down everyone else&rsquo;s throat. If the Church or any business will not accept these terms, or truly honors God, there will be hell to pay!&quot; said the SaveWalMart site. &quot;Now Satan has Wal-Mart in his line of fire!&quot;
<div>The company also recently offered for sale online a book promoting lesbian sex to girls still young enough to be playing with Barbies, and as <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53011">WND reported, pulled it when the offering was publicized.</a>
<div>The company also has had <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52811">several workers</a> quit their jobs and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52672">plan protests</a> because of the support for the &quot;gay causes.&quot;
<div>Tony Perkins, of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.frc.org">Family Research Council</a> in Washington, D.C., said the problem is that the homosexual business group isn't just that. While the NGLCC &quot;professes to promote the 'interests of the LGBT business community,' this is not all they have done,&quot; he said.
<div>He said the group recently described efforts to defend traditional marriage as an attempt to &quot;write discrimination into the Constitution &hellip;&quot; and it has advocated attaching a pro-homosexual &quot;hate crimes&quot; amendment to legislation intended to protect children from violent sex offenders.
<div>AFA boycotts in the past have proven effective, even though the organization doesn't take credit for all of the impacts. An example is the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ford.com/en/support/contactUs.htm?referrer=home&amp;source=botnav">Ford Motor Company</a> which more than a year ago embraced the &quot;gay&quot; community in its advertising and programs.
<div>The AFA and dozens of other Christian groups joined in a boycott, and since then Ford has lost hundreds of millions of dollars, laid off tens of thousands of workers and is trying to regroup and stabilize. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2894</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2894</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong><font size="5">Wal-Mart to Reconsider Sponsorship of Controversial Groups</font></strong></div>
<div>
<div><em>American Family Association cancels its boycott.</em>
<div>
<div>Wal-Mart has begun to distance itself from organizations that support &ldquo;highly controversial issues&rdquo; such as same-sex marriage, a company official said Tuesday.</div>
<div>The giant retailer had been criticized for making a $60,000 donation to Out and Equal, an organization for homosexual employees which deals with workplace issues, but which also supports changing the definition of marriage. The company also had joined the Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce and sent it $25,000 in dues. </div>
<div>The Wal-Mart executive who served as the company's representative to the chamber has since left for unrelated reasons and will not be replaced.</div>
<div>The donations in question are miniscule compared to the total of $245 million Wal-Mart gives out annually, a large portion going to more conservative and Christian-related causes and organizations.</div>
<div>&ldquo;Going forward, we&rsquo;ll be looking differently at organizations we donate to,&rdquo; the official said. &ldquo;There are some areas we need to get corrected and that is what we&rsquo;re focused on.&rdquo;</div>
<div>He emphasized the new direction was not aimed only at the issue of homosexuality, but also other social controversies. He was not more specific.</div>
<div>He stressed that Wal-Mart will always be a company that demonstrates care and respect for every individual and employee. From time to time, he said, there may be donations to specific projects of organizations that are involved in activities that could be deemed controversial, but those projects would have to relate directly to serving customers better.</div>
<div>The American Family Association (AFA) canceled its call for a two-day post-Thanksgiving boycott of Wal-Mart after hearing the company's statement. AFA said it believes Wal-Mart will now remain neutral in cultural battles.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2893</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2893</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Houston Bible ban to be reviewed by court<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Earlier ruling said monument was OK, then became unconstitutional</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>A court opinion that participants said could have left any public facility or building in danger of being declared unconstitutional if a prayer meeting was held there will be re-heard by the federal appeals court that released the first opinion.
<div>A federal court order said the dispute over a Bible in a monument on public property in Houston will be heard by the full 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the earlier opinion, from a panel on the court, was being vacated.
<div>&quot;We are very pleased that several of the justices saw the inequities in the decisions by Judge Lake as well as the Fifth Circuit panel and initiated further hearing of this case by the full court,&quot; said a statement from the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.uspastorcouncil.org">Houston Area Pastor Council.</a> &quot;The fact that every judge who has and will be involved in this case swears their oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution with their hand on a Bible illustrates the fallacy of declaring the Bible in the Mosher Monument unconstitutional.&quot;
<div>The dispute is over a Bible in the monument, which is designed like a podium.
<div>An atheist challenged the existence of the monument, and on an appeal from the Judge Sim Lake's district court decision the Bible was unconstitutional, the 5th Circuit panel carried it even further.
<div>That ruling said the monument became an unconstitutional &quot;establishment&quot; after a 2003 rally was held by Christians to defend the display. The court noted that rally involved both prayers and clergy.
<div>&quot;The anti-religious content of Judge Lake's decision, particularly its attack on public religious expression by elected officials and clergy, must not stand,&quot; the pastors said.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>Dave Welch, executive director for the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.uspastorcouncil.org">Houston Area Pastors Conference,</a> which has been working to defend the Bible, told WND the court earlier pulled a &quot;Roe vs. Wade.&quot;
<div>He was referring to the 1973 decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court discovered the right to an abortion in the U.S. Constitution. In this case, he said, the court divided the existence of the monument into three trimesters, and found that in the current trimester, it was unconstitutional.
<div>&quot;On one hand, this is not unique,&quot; Welch told WND. &quot;We've seen this happening all over the country.&quot;
<div>He said the monument had been on the county grounds for several decades without offense. It had been installed in honor of William Mosher, the founder of Star of Hope Mission.
<div>The monument, however, had been damaged, and in 1996, it was repaired with donated funding. Then came one atheist and suddenly the religious rights of an entire community had to be compromised, he said.
<div>Polling has shown that about 86 percent of the people in Houston want to keep the Bible monument at the public location, he said.
<div>&quot;The ramifications of this tortured decision are breath-taking and without any historic or legitimate Constitutional rationale,&quot; the pastors' organization said of the earlier conclusion. &quot;For the court to state that if a private citizen exercises his or her First Amendment rights of religious expression and assembly on public property, that any monument, building or fixed item of any kind that contains religious references becomes 'establishment of religion' is simply irrational.&quot;
<div>The pastors conference said under that now-failed reasoning, any monument, building or even feature of nature would be an illegal &quot;establishment of religion&quot; if a church ceremony is held there.
<div>The case now will be heard &quot;en banc,&quot; or by the full 5th Circuit Court, instead of just by a panel, the court order said. The same order also struck down the previous decision by the court's panel, leaving it open for the Bible to be replaced in the monument pending the next court decision, Welch told WND.
<div>Welch said under such decisions as the court's earlier ruling, America is well on its way to a persecuted Christian church.
<div>&quot;We have history, law and the founding fathers who adopted the Constitution collectively affirming the truth expressed by revered Justice Joseph Story in 1840 that, 'We are not to attribute this prohibition of a national religious establishment to an indifference to religion in general, and especially to Christianity,'&quot; a statement from the pastor's group had said.
<div>The court's earlier finding could mean the Washington Monument's reference to God would have to be eliminated, and the Supreme Court's Ten Commandments might need to be taken down, officials said.
<div>Welch said there are experts on constitutional law from organizations such as Liberty Legal Institute and the Alliance Defense Fund who have been and plan to continue assisting the county in its fight over the representation of the Bible.
<div>Because the atheist's lawsuit was against the county over the monument on county land, the pastors and their advisors have been directing their assistance to County Attorney Michael Stafford, who has been leading the arguments in the case.
<div>&quot;The First Amendment was adopted to restrain government's interference with religion and through a series of revisionist court decisions over the past sixty years we have lost much of that restraint. We are mandated by our calling and by our God to proclaim truth and defend the freedoms bought by the blood of our savior and hundreds of thousands of patriots to this day,&quot; the pastors said. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2890</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2890</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Thanksgiving in America<br />
 <br />
by David Barton<br />
<br />
</h3>
<div>The tradition of Thanksgiving as a time to focus on God and His blessings dates back almost four centuries in America. While such celebrations occurred at Cape Henry Virginia as early as 1607, it is from the Pilgrims that we derive the current tradition of Thanksgiving.
<div> </div>
<div>The Pilgrims left England on September 6, 1620, and for two months braved the harsh elements of a storm-tossed sea. After disembarking at Plymouth Rock, they had a prayer service and began building hasty shelters, but unprepared for a harsh New England winter, nearly half died before spring.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Yet persevering in prayer, and assisted by helpful Indians, they reaped a bountiful harvest the following summer. The grateful Pilgrims then declared a three-day feast in December 1621 to thank God and to celebrate with their Indian friends &mdash; America&rsquo;s first Thanksgiving Festival. This began an annual tradition in the New England Colonies that slowly spread into other Colonies.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The first national Thanksgiving occurred in 1789. According to the <em>Congressional Record</em> for September 25 of that year, immediately after approving the Bill of Rights:</div>
<blockquote>
<div>Mr. Elias Boudinot said he could not think of letting the congressional session end without offering an opportunity to all the citizens of the United States of joining with one voice in returning to Almighty God their sincere thanks for the many blessings He had poured down upon them. With this view, therefore, he would move the following resolution:</div>
<br />
<div><em>&quot;Resolved,</em> That a joint committee of both Houses be directed to wait upon the President of the United States to request that he would recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer. . . . Mr. Roger Sherman justified the practice of thanksgiving not only as a praiseworthy one in itself but also as warranted by a number of precedents in Holy Writ. . . . This example he thought worthy of a Christian imitation on the present occasion.&quot;</div>
</blockquote>
<div>The resolution was delivered to President George Washington who heartily concurred with the congressional request, declaring: </div>
<blockquote>Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor. . . . Now, therefore, I do appoint Thursday, the 26<sup>th</sup> day of November 1789 . . . that we may all unite to render unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection.</blockquote>
<div>National Thanksgiving Proclamations occurred sporadically following this one, and most official Thanksgiving observances still occurred only at the State level. Much of the credit for the adoption of an annual national Thanksgiving may be attributed to Mrs. Sarah Joseph Hale, the editor of <em>Godey&rsquo;s Lady&rsquo;s Book</em>. For thirty years, she promoted the idea of a national Thanksgiving Day, contacting President after President until Abraham Lincoln responded in 1863 by setting aside the last Thursday of November, declaring:</div>
<blockquote>We often forget the Source from which the blessings of fruitful years and healthful skies come. . . . No human wisdom hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God. . . . I therefore invite my fellow-citizens in every part of the United States . . . to observe the last Thursday of November as a day of thanksgiving and praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens.</blockquote>
<div>For the next seventy-five years, Presidents followed Lincoln&rsquo;s precedent, annually declaring a national Thanksgiving Day. Then, in 1941, Congress permanently established the fourth Thursday of each November as a national holiday.</div>
<div>As you celebrate the Thanksgiving holiday this year, remember to retain the original gratefulness to God that has always been the spirit of this, the oldest of all American holidays.</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote>Congress recommends a day of . . . thanksgiving and praise so that the people may express the grateful feelings of their hearts . . . and join . . . their prayers that it may please God, through the merits of Jesus Christ, to forgive our sins and . . . to enlarge His kingdom which consists in righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Ghost. (Continental Congress, 1777 --Written by Signers of the Declaration Samuel Adams and Richard Henry Lee ) </blockquote><blockquote>I appoint . . . a day of public Thanksgiving to Almighty God. . . to ask Him that He would . . . pour out His Holy Spirit on all ministers of the Gospel; that He would . . . spread the light of Christian knowledge through the remotest corners of the earth; . . . and that He would establish these United States upon the basis of religion and virtue. (Governor Thomas Jefferson, 1779 )  </blockquote><blockquote>I. . . appoint . . . a day of public thanksgiving and praise . . . to render to God the tribute of praise for His unmerited goodness towards us . . . by giving to us . . . the Holy Scriptures which are able to enlighten and make us wise to eternal salvation. . . . And to pray that He would forgive our sins and . . . cause the religion of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ to be known, understood, and practiced among all the people of the earth. (Governor John Hancock, 1790) </blockquote></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2889</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2889</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Woman wins religious discrimination case<br />
</h3>
<div>By DANA FIELDS Associated Press Writer <br />
&copy; 2006 The Associated Press </div>
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div>SAVANNAH, Mo. &mdash; Three years after she was fired for refusing to work on Sundays, Connie Rehm has won back her job on the staff of this small town's public library, and her employers have received a costly education in employment rights law.</div>
<div>No less a legal team than the same Florida attorneys who represented the parents of Terri Schiavo _ the brain-damaged woman at the center of last year's right-to-die case _ took up Rehm's cause, suing Rolling Hills Consolidated Library on a claim of religious discrimination.</div>
<div>A federal jury found in her favor after a three-day trial in May, and last month she was reinstated on a judge's order to the staff assistant job she had held for 12 years before her religious practice and the library's adoption of Sunday hours collided in 2003.</div>
<div>To Rehm, a 54-year-old former junior high school math teacher who still attends the Lutheran church where she and her husband were married 34 years ago, the outcome of her case is a victory for any employee whose conviction against laboring on the Sabbath is tested by workplace demands.</div>
<div>&quot;A middle American, mild-mannered, small-town library person _ I attribute to the Lord a great sense of humor for having picked me for this test,&quot; Rehm mused in an interview at her home in rural Savannah, a northwest Missouri town of 4,900.</div>
<div>Though claims of religious discrimination are growing in number, they were only a tiny segment _ just 3.1 percent _ of the slightly more than 75,000 complaints filed last year with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.</div>
<div>The agency is a sort of legal gatekeeper, weeding out baseless claims and attempting to resolve those that seem to present genuine violations of the Civil Rights Act.</div>
<div>Rarer still are religious discrimination cases that wind up in a courtroom. When, as in Rehm's case, the EEOC determines that a violation did occur, both sides typically prefer settlement to arguing their positions before an unpredictable jury.</div>
<div>&quot;As a plaintiff in a trial, you run the risk of no recovery. As a defendant, you run the risk of being found liable and having to pay damages,&quot; said Rehm's attorney, David C. Gibbs III of the Florida-based Gibbs Law Firm. The firm takes cases like Rehm's for the Christian Law Association.</div>
<div>Religious discrimination may be a specialized area only because such cases are uncommon, and not often won. And it's unlikely to remain a small area of the law much longer, said St. Louis attorney Jim Paul, chairman of The Missouri Bar's Labor and Employment Law Committee.</div>
<div>&quot;Religious discrimination claims are definitely a new hot topic,&quot; Paul said. &quot;A lot of companies and organizations are now operating longer hours and more days a week, so inevitably you're crossing paths with other parts of people's lives, including religious practices and observances.&quot;</div>
<div>The jury awarded Rehm $53,712 in damages, representing her lost library wages minus what she earned at other jobs after being fired. But the real prize was recovering the job she considers &quot;a gift from God&quot; because it allows her to serve her community.</div>
<div>&quot;One of the unique elements of this case is that Connie wasn't interested in money, she wanted her job back. That's an uncommon situation,&quot; Gibbs said.</div>
<div>The library's position in settlement negotiations was &quot;to deal with it as a financial matter,&quot; essentially paying to make Rehm and her claim go away, he said.</div>
<div>Rehm wasn't interested. She saw no reason for abandoning either her beloved second career or _ as federal law phrases it _ her &quot;sincerely held religious belief&quot; in abstaining from work on Sundays.</div>
<div>&quot;What price is my religious freedom? What is it worth?&quot; Rehm said. &quot;It's not a matter of displaying the Ten Commandments. It's being able to live the Ten Commandments, and that's what my employer was asking me not to do.&quot;</div>
<div>Damages might be just part of the cost to the library district. The judge also could order it to pay Rehm's legal fees _ and Gibbs' firm is seeking nearly $300,000 for their work.</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2888</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2888</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Food Yes, Faith No in FEMA-Managed Katrina Housing<br />
<font face="Arial, Helvetica" size="-1">Officials with the Federal Emergency Management Agency have told a Louisiana church that it cannot share the gospel after providing free barbeques to victims of Hurricane Katrina.</font></h3>
<div>Representatives of a management group that operates five FEMA trailer communities near the Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport told members of the Calvary Baton Rouge Church that preaching was not allowed on the government properties. The officials are also prohibiting the church from using community facilities for Bible studies even though other groups freely use the facilities. Attendance at the gospel messages that follow the barbeques or at the Bible studies is completely voluntary.</div>
<div>That action has prompted a letter from the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/">Alliance Defense Fund</a> (ADF) to government officials, demanding an end to the policy. ADF attorney Jeremy Tedesco says actions by the unidentified government officials are unconstitutional.</div>
<div>&quot;It's a clear cut violation of the First Amendment,&quot; says the attorney. &quot;Government cannot engage in what's called viewpoint discrimination. When the government says, 'We welcome all speakers except those who want to promote a religious point of view,' they violate the First Amendment rights of those religious speakers,&quot; he explains.</div>
<div>According to Tedesco, the church members just want to help others. &quot;The desire of these church members is to provide food free of charge for victims of Hurricane Katrina, but now they are being told to keep quiet about the very faith that motivates them to help their neighbor,&quot; he continues. &quot;Churches desiring to help those in need should not be given this kind of second-class treatment.&quot;</div>
<div>Tedesco shares why ADF sent the letter demanding that FEMA officials allow preaching and voluntary Bible studies at the trailer communities set up to assist the hurricane victims.</div>
<div>&quot;If we don't pursue these kind of matters, at some point, governments are going to be willing to do it every time they see somebody speaking about religion on public property,&quot; he says. &quot;So we've got to hold the line and make sure that the rights of religious individuals are respected.&quot;</div>
<div>Tedesco says FEMA officials had until November 17 to respond to the letter.</div>
<div><em>&copy; 2006 AgapePress all rights reserved</em></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2887</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2887</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>ADF: More than 950 attorneys nationwide ready to combat attempts to censor Christmas</h3>
<div>
<div id="ContentViewer1_divPoll"><br />
</div>
<div id="ContentViewer1_spnContent">SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. &mdash; The Alliance Defense Fund announced today it has more than 950 allied attorneys available nationwide to combat any improper attempts to censor the celebration of Christmas in schools and on public property.<br />
<br />
&quot;Frankly, it's ridiculous that Americans have to think twice about whether it's okay to say Merry Christmas,&quot; said ADF President Alan Sears.  &quot;Thanks to the ACLU and its allies, Christmas isn't what it used to be.  It's time to repair the damage that such organizations have done to America's favorite holiday.  An overwhelming majority of Americans oppose censoring Christmas.&quot;<br />
<br />
According to recent polls,<br />
<ul>
    <li>95 percent of Americans celebrate Christmas (Fox News/Opinion Dynamics, 2005). </li>
    <li>90 percent of Americans recognize Christmas as the birthday of Jesus Christ (Gallup, 2000). </li>
    <li>88 percent of Americans say it is okay for people to wish others &quot;Merry Christmas&quot; and the majority of Americans are more likely to wish someone they just met &quot;Merry Christmas&quot; rather than &quot;Happy Holidays&quot; (CNN/USA Today/Gallup, 2004). </li>
    <li>87 percent of Americans believe nativity scenes should be allowed on public property (Fox News/Opinion Dynamics, 2003).</li>
</ul>
<div>&quot;ADF's goal once again this season is to inform, educate, and help protect the rights of the 95% of Americans who celebrate Christmas,&quot; Sears explained.  &quot;It's a sad day in America when you have to retain an attorney to wish someone a Merry Christmas.  The fear, intimidation, and disinformation spread by the ACLU and its allies over the years will not be changed overnight.  That's why ADF wants to dispel the myths about religious expression at Christmastime that have prompted wrongful acts of government censorship of religious speech.&quot;<br />
<br />
The purpose of ADF's Christmas Project is to clear up misconceptions about seasonal religious expression on public property:</div>
<ul>
    <li>The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled that public schools must ban the singing of religious Christmas carols or prohibit the distribution of candy canes or Christmas cards. </li>
    <li>School officials do not violate the Constitution by closing on religious holidays such as Christmas and Good Friday. </li>
    <li>School officials are not legally obligated to recognize all other religious holidays simply because they officially recognize Thanksgiving or Christmas. </li>
    <li>School officials may use &quot;Christmas Vacation&quot; to refer to the December holiday break without offending the Constitution. </li>
    <li>Government-sponsored Christmas displays are not banned as some people believe.  When faced with the question of whether a Christmas display is constitutional, a court simply asks, &quot;Is the government celebrating the holiday or promoting religion?&quot;  Often, the &quot;Three Reindeer Rule&quot; is used by courts, whereby a judge reasons that having a sufficient number of secular objects in close enough proximity to the Christmas item (such as a cr&egrave;che) renders the overall display as a constitutional community observance of the holiday.</li>
</ul>
Participating with ADF in this year's Christmas Project are Concerned Women for America; Focus on the Family; Coral Ridge Ministries; Outreach, Inc. <em>(upon approval from President Scott Evans)</em>; and the majority of America's state-based family policy councils.<br />
<br />
ADF will represent people of faith, as well as school districts or other entities, free of charge--as it has in numerous instances in recent years--to defend their freedom of speech regarding Christmas, even after Christmas is over.<br />
<br />
Despite statements made last year by the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State that allegations of legal attacks against Christmas are &quot;fictional&quot; (&quot;A Fictional War on Christmas,&quot; by T. Jeremy Gunn, <em>USA Today</em>, Dec. 18, 2005) and &quot;thinner than cheap wrapping paper&quot; (AUSCS press release, Dec. 19, 2005), the ACLU filed suit against the Wilson County School System in Tennessee just months later.  Among the allegations in the suit, the ACLU objects to a kindergarten Christmas program held at one of the district's schools.<br />
<br />
ADF has prepared a free informational pamphlet titled &quot;The Truth about Religious Expression at Christmastime.&quot;  Informational legal information letters that can be sent to school or municipal officials regarding the law and Christmas expression are also available.  Concerned citizens can visit <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.saychristmas.org/">www.saychristmas.org</a> or call 1-877-TELL-ADF.<br />
<br />
ADF is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. <br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2886</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2886</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[Under Construction]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2885</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2885</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>ABC News Makes False Claims on Abortion Risks, Pregnancy Centers</h3>
<p><br />
<span id="lw_1163934267_14">New York, NY</span> (LifeNews.com) -- Following the lead of abortion advocacy groups, ABC News reporter Dan Harris wrote a news article Friday attacking the work of the thousands of pregnancy centers nationwide that provide abortion alternatives and help for pregnant women. The article also contained a false claim that induced abortion has no link to various confirmed risks. In the headline of its story, ABC News claims that crisis pregnancy centers are &quot;offering information long discredited by the medical community.&quot; The claim comes after comments from abortion advocates who allege pregnancy centers &quot;harass and mislead women by telling them ... that abortions can lead to breast cancer, sterility and depression.&quot; Harris then writes, &quot;These claims have all been widely discredited by the medical community&quot; though he provides no evidence in the story to back up his assertion. The news report, however, runs counter to significant recent medical research. A study published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry in January found that mental health problems, including depression, anxiety, substance abuse and suicidal thoughts, were more likely to occur among women who had an abortion than women who had never been pregnant or didn't have an abortion. The research found that 42 percent of the women who had abortions had experienced major depression within the last four years. That's almost double the rate of women who never became pregnant. The risk of anxiety disorders also doubled. LifeNews.com contacted Harris about his article and the false claim on the abortion risks and Harris defended the allegation. The &quot;medical community&quot; that Harris says believes abortion doesn't lead to depression, breast cancer or sterility consists only of an internal group of doctors that advise ABC News. ACTION: Contact ABC News and urge it to feature abortion news reports that are fairly and accurately written: ABC News, 77 W. 66 St., <span id="lw_1163934267_15">New York, NY 10023</span> (p) 212-456-7777. Or send an email to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://us.f347.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=support@abcnews.go.com">support@abcnews.go.com</a> about Dan Harris' news story. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat2766.html">Read the complete story</a>.<br />
</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2884</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2884</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>School bans pro-life T-shirts, fliers<br />
Officials fear other students will object, consider message religious<br />
</h3>
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>A Virginia high school barred a Christian student from distributing materials and wearing a T-shirt that declared opposition to abortion, prompting a legal response.
<div>Andrew Raker, a student at Millbrook High School in Winchester, Va., participated in a national pro-life event Oct. 24 called the &quot;Day of Silent Solidarity&quot; in which he distributed postcard-sized fliers with information about abortion, the Arizona-based <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.alliancedefensefund.org">Alliance Defense Fund</a> said.
<div>The next day, school officials pulled Raker from class and told him he could no longer distribute the materials because other students might object or consider them to be religious in nature.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>ADF said Millbrook's principal, Joseph Swack, also threatened to force Raker to remove or cover his pro-life clothing if other students complained.
<div>In addition, Swack deferred a decision on Raker's request to form a pro-life club, expressing doubt about its acceptability.
<div>The Alliance Defense Fund responded with a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/RakerLetter.pdf">letter</a> to Swack contending the high school's refusal to allow a student to present pro-life speech violates the Constitution.
<div>&quot;Christian students cannot be treated as second-class citizens,&quot; said ADF Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. &quot;Expressing a pro-life point of view, whether it is considered to be 'popular' or not, does not disqualify an individual from the right to free speech.&quot;
<div>As <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52016">WND reported in September</a>, a California school changed its T-shirt policy after two students were reprimanded for wearing the &quot;inappropriate&quot; Christian message that life is valuable.
<div>One of the messages, according to the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.pacificjustice.org">Pacific Justice Institute</a>, read on the back: &quot;Help Cure Abortion&quot; on the front, and &quot;Abortion: The leading cause of death in America 1,200,000 every year.&quot;
<div>One student was pulled from class by two instructors who told her she was not allowed to wear the shirt to school because it was &quot;inappropriate.&quot; The situation quickly was reversed when the Pacific Justice Institute sent a letter to school officials expressing concern over the First Amendment implications of the school's demands.
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37539">In March 2004</a>, another Virginia high school student was barred from wearing a shirt with a pro-life message because it violated the school's policy against profane or obscene language.
<div>The shirt said: &quot;Abortion is Homicide. You will not silence my message. You will not mock my God. You will stop killing my generation. Rock for Life.&quot;
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30861">As WND reported in 2003</a>, a student in Cleveland was given two days of Saturday detention after two students in his 1,200-member high school complained about a sweatshirt with the same message.
<div>In Pennsylvania, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30781">a junior high school principal barred a T-shirt with that message</a>, arguing it was the equivalent of wearing a swastika to school. The principal later reversed his decision after the Thomas More Law Center explained the student's First Amendment rights and threatened a lawsuit. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2883</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2883</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Federal Court Upholds Protection of Pro-Life Physicians</h3>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Tuesday upheld a lower court decision to dismiss a lawsuit that sought to withhold federal aid to doctors who refuse to perform abortions.</div>
<div>The original lawsuit, brought by the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association (NFPRHA), challenged a federal statute known as the Weldon Amendment. The amendment prohibits government agencies receiving certain federal aid from discriminating against medical professionals who refuse to perform abortions and who refuse to refer abortion-minded women to an abortionist.</div>
<div>NFPRHA argued that the Weldon Amendment was too vague to enforce and that its member organizations had a constitutional right to force physicians to at least provide referrals.</div>
<div>Casey Mattox, litigation counsel for the Christian Legal Society's Center for Law and Religious Freedom, along with attorneys for the Alliance Defense Fund, represented the Christian Medical Association and the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists.</div>
<div>&quot;Under the banner of 'choice,' the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association asserted a supposed right to do this, but the court didn't buy it,&quot; Mattox said. &quot;This decision turns back the effort to enshrine abortion as a right above even the First Amendment.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2882</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2882</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Liberty Counsel Helps Open Doors for Christian Clubs in Public Schools<br />
</strong>
<div>By Allie Martin<br />
November 15, 2006</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - Student-led Christian clubs have recently been approved in four U.S. school districts after the clubs at first faced resistance from school administrators. A spokesman for the pro-family, public interest law firm Liberty Counsel says the legal organization is working with Child Evangelism Fellowship (CEF) to clear the way for that ministry's after-school Good News Clubs in public schools nationwide.</div>
<div>Two school districts in Utah, one in North Carolina, and another in Minnesota have agreed to allow Good News Clubs to use school facilities for the clubs' after-school meetings. In all cases, district officials initially rejected requests from students to form the clubs; however, attorney and Liberty Counsel founder Mat Staver says more school districts are realizing that Christian clubs have rights.</div>
<div><br />
<strong>Mat Staver</strong> ? <br />
<br />
&quot;Since 2001, when the <em>Good News Club </em>[<em>v. Milford Central School</em>] was decided at the Supreme Court, there's been a lot more openness by the schools to allow Good News Clubs,&quot; Staver points out. &quot;In fact, the law is crystal clear,&quot; he asserts, &quot;that public elementary schools that allow any other after-school secular program on campus are not able to discriminate against Good News Clubs just because of their Christian viewpoint.&quot;</div>
<div>In <em>Good News Club v. Milford Central School</em>, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas, that the school's restriction against the Good News Club violated the club's free-speech rights and that &quot;no Establishment Clause concern justifies that violation.&quot;</div>
<div>According to the high court's ruling in 2001, when Milford Central School officials denied the Christian club access to the school's limited public forum on the ground that the club was religious in nature, it discriminated against the club because of its religious viewpoint in violation of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.</div>
<div>In the recent cases of school districts that initially denied the Good News Club use of their facilities, Liberty Counsel intervened to help resolve the conflicts by informing district officials of the law regarding the Christian clubs' rights. In Lone Peak and Forbes, Utah, after being stonewalled and rejected, the Good News Clubs finally received permission to use the schools' facilities on Wednesday of last week.</div>
<div>In Naytahwaush, Minnesota, CEF has tried to start clubs at several schools but for a long time met opposition from the Indian reservation there. Liberty Counsel got involved and helped CEF secure approval for a Good News Club at the Naytahwaush Community Charter School. Now, the legal organization reports, local CEF leaders are excited about the new club and the growth of the local chapter.</div>
<div>And in Orange County, North Carolina, after the law firm issued a written demand to reverse a decision forbidding public school teachers from leading Good News Clubs, the Orange County school district agreed to no longer restrict any employee's private-speech rights. Teachers are now allowed to lead the clubs on their own time, including after-school.</div>
<div>Good News Clubs are designed to develop character and teach positive values to children from ages 5 to 12, using songs, games, prayer time, Bible stories, and scripture memorization, Staver notes. &quot;This was met with resistance, however, until we intervened, sent the letter, and gave information,&quot; he says, &quot;and now the doors that were once shut are open.&quot;</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2788</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2788</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Schumer Vows to Block the President's Judicial Nominees</strong></div>
<div>by Wendy Cloyd, assistant editor</div>
<div></div>
<div><em>Family advocates say judges should not legislate from the bench.</em></div>
<div></div>
<div>When the 110th Congress convenes in January, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., will become chairman of the Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts and he's absolutely saying he plans to reject any of President Bush's judicial nominees who appear to be conservative.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&quot;There will be no more right-wing judges, period,&quot; he told the <span id="lw_1163680769_0">New York</span> <em>Daily News</em>. &quot;(Bush) will have to negotiate with us, because we'll have the majority.&quot;</div>
<div></div>
<div>According to the <span id="lw_1163680769_1">New York</span> Sun, Schumer said the single greatest failure of the Democrats was allowing Samuel Alito to join the Supreme Court.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&ldquo;Judges are the most important,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One more justice would have made it a 5-4 conservative, hard-right majority for a long time. That won&rsquo;t happen.&rdquo;</div>
<div></div>
<div>With more than 50 federal judicial vacancies, Bush has many opportunities to place judges who see their job as interpreters of the Constitution rather than as makers of law. But every nominee must be approved by Schumer and his panel before further consideration. And Schumer will control the interview process.</div>
<div></div>
<div><span id="lw_1163680769_2">The White House</span> today submitted six nominations. Terrence Boyle of <span id="lw_1163680769_3">North Carolina</span> and William James Haynes II of Virginia were nominated to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in <span id="lw_1163680769_4">Richmond, Va</span>.; Michael Wallace of <span id="lw_1163680769_5">Mississippi</span> was nominated to the 5th Circuit in <span id="lw_1163680769_6">New Orleans</span>; Peter Keisler was nominated to the D.C. Circuit; and William Myers III and Norman Smith, both of <span id="lw_1163680769_7">Idaho</span>, were nominated to the 9th Circuit in <span id="lw_1163680769_8">San Francisco</span>. </div>
<div></div>
<div>Five of those nominees already have been through the ringer with Democrats. Last August, liberals in the Senate charged that the nominees were an attempt by the president to appeal to his conservative base. Schumer is using that same argument in his threats to obstruct.</div>
<div></div>
<div>''Democrats have asked the president to be bipartisan, but this is a clear slap in the face at our request,'' Schumer told The Associated Press in response to the news of the nominations. ''For the sake of the country, we hope that this is an aberration, because the president feels he must placate his hard-right base, rather than an indication of things to come.''</div>
<div></div>
<div>Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said Schumer is making a huge political mistake by &quot;crying wolf&quot; about &quot;right-wing&quot; judges.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&quot;That's what he called Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito,&quot; he said. &quot;That was before the American public had the opportunity to watch them during their confirmation hearings and observe otherwise.&quot;</div>
<div></div>
<div>Those hearings, Hausknecht said, highlighted the truth that a &quot;right-wing&quot; judge is simply someone who believes the Constitution should be interpreted according to its original meaning, and that judges should use restraint, rather than legislate social policy from the bench. </div>
<div></div>
<div>Schumer, a graduate of Harvard Law, should know the role of judges, he said, but seems to have forgotten his law-school training and is trying to appease Democrats.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., said conservative candidates should have placed the issue at the forefront prior to November's election.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&quot;When I was out traveling, that was the primary thing I talked about -- and it registered with people,&quot; he said. &quot;But I don't think we pushed it hard enough. We clearly should have, particularly in the Senate races.&quot;</div>
<div></div>
<div>November's election is over, Hausknecht said, and with a presidential election just two years away, Americans need to keep an eye on the judicial-nomination process.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&quot;Schumer's rhetoric and planned obstruction of judicial nominees was sadly predictable,&quot; he said. &quot;If his actions follow his rhetoric, which is absolutely contrary to the will of the voters, it will be a short two-year stint for the Democrats in control of the Senate.&quot;</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2787</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2787</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Strict-Separation Group Asks IRS to Investigate Churches</strong></div>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div></div>
<div><em>Tactic designed to intimidate pastors, experts say.</em></div>
<div></div>
<div>Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) has turned in four churches to the Internal Revenue Service for what it calls &ldquo;electioneering violations.&quot; </div>
<div></div>
<div>Rob Boston, spokesman for AU, said the message to pastors wanting to address issues during election season is: &quot;Be extremely cautious.&quot;</div>
<div></div>
<div>The IRS has not indicated whether it will investigate the churches. </div>
<div></div>
<div>AU is asking the IRS to investigate churches in Maryland, <span id="lw_1163680630_9" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Iowa</span> and <span id="lw_1163680630_10" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Arkansas</span>. How is it getting the information?</div>
<div></div>
<div>&quot;This case in <span id="lw_1163680630_11" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Arkansas</span> came to our attention from residents in the area who sent the material to us,&quot; <span id="lw_1163680630_12" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #dceeff">Boston</span> told Family News in Focus. &quot;When we get those, we simply put the material together, make the best case we can to the IRS, send it off and say, 'This may be worth looking into.' &quot;</div>
<div></div>
<div>Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said the action reveals the agenda.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&quot;The agenda of Americans United is simply to raise enough dust so that they get the headlines they need,&quot; he said. &quot;So that what pastors will remember in the next election cycle is, 'There was some IRS investigation going on about churches and politics and we should stay out of it.' &quot;</div>
<div></div>
<div>Hausknecht said churches should fight back.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&quot;I hope these churches will fight these charges to the fullest extent possible,&quot; he said. &quot;I know that they can get free legal representation from organizations designed to thwart the attempts of Americans United to try to freeze the faith vote. I am certain they will be vindicated if they fight those allegations.&quot;</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2786</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2786</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><strong>LAME-DUCK REPUBLICANS SHOULD ACT AGAINST ABORTION</strong></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">Steve Lefemine of <span id="lw_1163679297_0" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">South Carolina</span> asks &quot;</font><strong><font face="Times New Roman">As the US House and US Senate come back into session today (Nov. 13) for the home stretch of the 109<sup>th</sup> Congress, <u>will the Republicans do in their last 50 days what they have failed to do for the last 12 years</u>? &hellip;, i.e. &lsquo;do right&rsquo; for the unborn, including <u><em>at least these two things</em></u>: </font></strong><font face="Times New Roman">.&quot; </font></div>
<ol>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;Hold a <u>pubic hearing</u> for the <u>Right to Life</u> (HR 552), a bill to <u>ban all abortion in America</u>, which has been repeatedly filed since at least 1995! </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New
    Roman">&quot;<u>Amend</u> the <u>Health and Human Services</u> Appropriations bill (<u>HR 5647</u>) to: </font></div>
    </li>
</ol>
<blockquote>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman"><u>de-fund</u> Medicaid <u>surgical abortions</u>; </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman"><u>de-fund</u> Medicaid and Title X <u>chemical abortions</u>; and, </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman"><u>de-fund Planned Parenthood</u>, getting <u>over $100 million per year</u> from Title X and Medicaid</font></div>
    </li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">Steve, speaking in behalf of Columbia Christians for Life, goes on to say: </font></div>
<ol>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;</font><strong><font face="Times New Roman"><u>Right to Life Act (HR 552</u>) (see bill at </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">http://thomas.loc.gov</font></a><font face="Times New Roman">) </font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;Hold a <u>public hearing</u> for the <u>Right to Life Act</u> (<u>HR 552),</u> repeatedly introduced since at least 1995, currently with <u>over 100 co-sponsors</u>, <em>and yet it has never even had a public hearing, though the Republicans have been in the majority in the US House continually since 1995</em>!!! </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<u>Right to Life Act (Introduced in US House) HR 552</u> - sponsor, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) </font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianlifeandliberty.net/HR552.03.doc"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">www.christianlifeandliberty.net/HR552.03.doc</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></div>
    </li>
    </dir></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<u>Current Party Divisions of the House</u>: (109<sup>th</sup> Congress, January 2005 through January 2, 2007) 229 Republicans, 201 Democrats, 1 Independent, 4 Vacancies </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://clerk.house.gov/"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">http://clerk.house.gov</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<u>New Party Divisions of the House</u>: (110<sup>th</sup> Congress, beginning o/a January 3, 2007) 232 Democrats, 203 Republicans </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politiceselections/vote%202006/front.htm"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">http://www.usatoday.com/news/politiceselections/vote 2006/front.htm</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<u>H.R. 552</u> is sponsored by <u>Rep. Duncan Hunter</u> (R-CA), who has announced he is running for U.S. President. The Right to Life Act is in the <u>US House Subcommittee on the Constitution</u> (chaired by <u>Rep. Steve Chabot</u> (R-OH), of the <u>House Judiciary Committee</u> (chaired by <u>Rep. James Sensenbrenner</u> (R-WI), both committees still controlled by a Republican-majority throughout the remainder of the now &lsquo;lame-duck&rsquo; 109<sup>th</sup> Congress, until January 2, 2007. </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<strong><u>Call these three Republican Congressmen, and urge them to finally hold a public hearing for HR 552 <em>now</em> while Republicans still control the committees and chairmanships in Congress through January 2, 2007</u>:</strong> </font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<strong>Representative Duncan Hunter (R-CA): </strong><span id="lw_1163679297_1" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">202-225-5672</span><br />
    </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.house.gov/hunter/"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">http://www.house.gov/hunter/</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<strong>Representative Steve Chabot (R-OH): </strong>202-225-22165<br />
    202-225-3012 (fax) </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.house.gove/chabot/"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">www.house.gove/chabot/</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><strong></strong><font face="Times New Roman"><span id="lw_1163679297_2" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">202-225-5101</span><br />
    </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.house.gov/sensenbrenner/"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">www.house.gov/sensenbrenner/</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> <br />
    <strong>&quot;U.S. House of Representatives, <span id="lw_1163679297_3" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Washington, DC 20515</span> 202-224-3121 </strong></font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;Representative James Sensenbrenner (R-WI): </font></div>
    </li>
    </dir></div>
    </li>
    </dir></strong></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<strong><u>Health and Human Services Appropriations bill (HR 5647</u>) </strong></font><dir><font face="arial"><font face="CentSchbook BT"><strong>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">See bill at </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">http://Thomas.loc.gov</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<u>Amend</u> the <u>Health and Human Services</u> Appropriations bill (<u>HR 5647</u>) to:</font><u><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">de-fund</font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">de-fund</font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">de-fund Planned Parenthood</font></div>
    </li>
    </dir><font face="CentSchbook BT"><strong></strong><font face="Times New Roman"></font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.house.gov/house/floor/thisweek.htm"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">http://www.house.gov/house/floor/thisweek.htm</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://majoritywhip.house.gov/calendar.asp"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">http://majoritywhip.house.gov/calendar.asp</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://clerk.house.gov/floorsummary/floor.html"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">http://clerk.house.gov/floorsummary/floor.html</font></a><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></div>
    </li>
    </dir></font></u><font face="Times New Roman">Medicaid <u>surgical abortions</u>; </font><u></u><font face="Times New Roman">Medicaid and Title X <u>chemical abortions</u>; and, </font><u></u><font face="Times New Roman">, getting <u>over $100 Million per year</u> from Title X and Medicaid</font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;This HHS bill has passed the House Committee on Appropriations, and is now waiting to be taken up on the House floor.</font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<strong>H.R. 5647 Title</strong>: Making appropriations for the Department of Labor, <strong>Health and Human Services,</strong> and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes. </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<strong>Will the Republicans in their last 50 days of majority control of Congress pass a Health and Human Services Appropriations bill (HR 5647) that <u>NO LONGER FUNDS</u> these abominations?:</strong></font><strong><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">Medicaid <u>surgical abortions</u> (rape, incest, life of the mother) </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">Medicaid and Title X </font><u><font face="Times New Roman">chemical abortions </font></u><font face="Times New Roman">(Planned Murder, Inc.) through Title X and Medicaid </font><u></u><font face="Times New Roman">(Title X) </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">Planned Parenthood</font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">Birth control for unmarried adolescents, even if the parents object</font></div>
    </li>
    </dir></strong></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<u><strong>Planned Parenthood reports record 255,000-plus abortions last year (2004-2005</strong></u>) &hellip;Planned Parenthood received $272.7 million in state and federal funding&hellip; </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<u><strong>U.S. House of Representatives, <span id="lw_1163679297_4" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Washington, DC 20515</span> 202-224-3121 </strong></u></font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<strong>Please <u>call your individual Congressman</u>, from your own US House district, from your own State, while he is back in <span id="lw_1163679297_5" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #0066cc 1px dashed">Washington, D.C</span>., <u>beginning today</u>, November 13, and ask them to <u>introduce an amendment on the floor of the US House</u>, when the <u>HHS Appropriations bill</u> (<u>HR 5647</u>) is taken up, to </strong></font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><strong><font face="Times New Roman">1) <u>de-fund</u> Medicaid <u>surgical abortions</u>; </font></strong></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><strong><font face="Times New Roman">2) <u>de-fund</u> Medicaid and Title X <u>chemical abortions</u>; and, </font></strong></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><strong><font face="Times New Roman">3) to <u>de-fund Planned Parenthood</u> from getting <u>over $100 Million per year</u> from Title X and Medicaid through this HHS bill. &hellip; </font></strong></div>
    </li>
    </dir></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;Specific <u><strong>Title X</strong></u> and <u><strong>Medicaid surgical abortion</strong></u> language to be <u><strong>deleted</strong></u> by House floor amendment: (</font><strong><font face="Times New Roman">go to </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399">http://thomas.loc.gov</font></a><font face="Times New Roman">, enter bill HR 5647) </font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;H.R. 5647 &quot;Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,. 2007 (Reported in House) </font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<u>Title X</u> &ndash; ask your Congressman to introduce an amendment to <u>delete the $283 Million for the Title X</u> birth control, Planned Parenthood, and population control funding program: </font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;TITLE II &ndash; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Health Resources and Services Administration &quot;<em>Provided further</em>, That of the funds made available under this heading, $283,103,000 shall be for the program under title X of the PHS Act to provide for voluntary family planning projects: </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;<u>Medicaid surgical abortions</u> &ndash; ask your Congressman to introduce an amendments to simply <u>delete SEC. 508(a), and thereby remove the mandatory requirement that states fund Medicaid abortions for rape, incest, and life of the mother, if they want to continue receiving Medicaid (socialized medicine) money from the federal government</u></font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;SEC. 508. (a) The limitations established in the preceding section shall not apply to an abortion&mdash; </font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;(1) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or </font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;(2) in the case where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising form the pregnancy itself, that would, as certified by a physician, place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed. </font></div>
    </li>
    </dir></div>
    </li>
    </dir></div>
    </li>
    </dir></div>
    </li>
    </dir></strong><font face="Times New Roman">. </font><strong></strong></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">&quot;</font><font face="Times New Roman"><strong>When is the Republican Party going to carry out its own national party platform, and exercise the power that Congress and the President have had at their disposal for over 33 years, to <u>end abortion in America</u> by applying <u>Art. III, Sec. 2 of the US Constitution</u>, and <u>limiting the appellate jurisdiction of the US supreme Court</u>, thereby preventing if form overturning a Congressional bill to ban all abortions in America? </strong></font></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman"><strong>&quot;This is the strategy of the Sanctity of Life Act of 2005 (HR 776), sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX): [removes jurisdiction of Federal Courts] </strong></font><dir>
    <li>
    <div align="left"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianlifeandliberty.net/HR776-01.doc"><font face="Times New Roman" color="#003399"><strong>www.christianlifeandliberty.net/HR776-01.doc</strong></font></a><font face="Times New Roman"><strong>.&quot; </strong></font></div>
    </li>
    </dir></div>
    </li>
    </strong><font face="Times New Roman">. </font></font></font></dir></div>
    </li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2785</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2785</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The &quot;Tolerant&quot; Ban on Religion <br />
</strong><br />
&mdash;Michael Medved <br />
<br />
Pop music legend Sir Elton John recently told an interviewer: &quot;From my point of view, I would ban religion completely. Organized religion doesn't seem to work. It turns people into really hateful lemmings and it's not really compassionate.&quot; <br />
<br />
His main objection to institutionalized faith involves its alleged lack of tolerance. &quot;I think religion has always tried to turn hatred toward gay people,&quot; he declared. His comments actually reveal the profound hypocrisy among politically correct secularists. He decries religion for its intolerance, yet no major religious leaders would dare to echo his words, saying: &quot;From my point of view, I would ban secularism--or atheism--completely.&quot; <br />
<br />
In modern Western societies like the <span id="lw_1163679142_0">United States</span> devout Christians co-exist comfortably with adherents of other faiths, and with those who practice no faith. It's non-believers who intolerantly seek to &quot;ban&quot; or dismantle organized religion, not people of faith. <br />
</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2784</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2784</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Displaced House Church Christians Resist Chinese Authorities, Despite Ongoing Harassment<br />
</h3>
<div>By Allie Martin<br />
November 14, 2006</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - Government officials in China continue their crackdown on unregistered Christian &quot;house churches.&quot; Late last month the gathering place for the Nongda house church was demolished by local Communist Chinese authorities.</div>
<div>Witnesses say 500 policemen and several hundred peasant workers descended on the site, driving people out and destroying the facility, which had served area Christians for more than a decade. And, according to China Aid Association (CAA) director Bob Fu, the Communist authorities are still persecuting members of the congregation.</div>
<div>&quot;Right now, the government has been harassing and threatening the active members of that church and sort of threatening them not to gather at that church site,&quot; Fu says. &quot;We do need to pray that those brothers and sisters will not stop worshipping the Lord and stop gathering, even though their church building was there.&quot;</div>
<div>In fact, the China Aid Association director says the Chinese government should arrange a new meeting place for the congregants, now that their church building and the furniture in it has been demolished. Within the space of an hour, he notes, the main part of Nongda house church's sanctuary was bulldozed under the pretext of &quot;urban appearance rearrangement.&quot;</div>
<div>CAA is appealing to the local government to give an account to Nongda house church concerning the demolition and to arrange for a new place of worship for the congregation. Meanwhile, Christian house church members are facing threats, harassment, and frequent physical attacks, but they have continued to hold to their principle of not affiliating with the government-registered Three-Self church movement.</div>
<div>Despite persecution and threats, Fu notes, &quot;the church of Christ is still there.&quot; He says the brothers and sisters of Nongda house church cherish orthodox Christian beliefs and biblical truth, and they ask earnestly that the body of Christ pray for their church in tribulation.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2768</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2768</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Ten Commandments stunner: Feds lying at Supreme Court<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Government tells modern visitors <br />
it's Bill of Rights being honored</font><br />
<font size="-1"><br />
<br />
</font>
<div>
<div><font size="+0">By Bob Unruh<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div><em>Every</em> argument before the U.S. Supreme Court and <em>every</em> opinion the justices deliver comes in the presence of the Ten Commandments, God's law given to Moses on a fire-scorched mountain, and now represented for the United States in the very artwork carved into the high court structure.
<div>In today's world of revisionist history, the proof comes through the work of a California pastor who visited the Supreme Court building recently when he was in Washington and was surprised that what the tour guides were telling him wasn't the same thing as what he was seeing.
<div>Todd DuBord, pastor of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.lacconline.org">Lake Almanor Community Church</a> in California, said he was traveling with his wife, Tracy, and was more than startled during recent visits to the courthouse and two other historic locations to discover the stories of the nation's heritage had been sterilized of Christian references.
<div>His entire research compilation is <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.lacconline.org/supremecourt.asp">available online.</a>
<div>&quot;Having done some research (before the trip), I absolutely was not expecting to hear those remarks,&quot; which, he told WND, simply &quot;denied history.&quot;
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>So he's written to the Supreme Court, and several other groups, asking them to restore the historic Christian influences to their information, and he's documented his research to explain to those interested what the history is and how it's been subverted.
<div>&quot;I would like to see the record rectified and the proper Christian and Judeo-Christian depictions taught in these places,&quot; he told WND.
<div>He was most disturbed by what appears to be revisionism in the presentations given to visitors at the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.supremecourtus.gov/index.html">Supreme Court</a>. There, he said, his tour guide was describing the marble frieze directly above the justices' bench.
<div>&quot;Between the images of the people depicting the Majesty of the Law and Power of Government, there is a tablet with ten Roman numerals, the first five down the left side and the last five down the right. This tablet represents the first ten amendments of the Bill of Rights,&quot; she said.
<div>The ten what? was DuBord's thought.
<div>Unwilling to be confrontational, he went home and started some research.
<div>
<div>One official Supreme Court document, he found, cited a letter from sculptor Adolph A. Weinman that said the &quot;pylon&quot; carved with Roman numerals I to X &quot;symbolizes the first ten amendments to the Constitution.&quot; But the letter was anomalous; it didn't have a number of certifying marks that were typical of others.
<div>So he continued looking and after calling in some assistance in his hunt for evidence, he found a 1975 official U.S. Supreme Court Handbook, prepared under the direction of Mark Cannon, administrative assistant to the chief justice. It said, &quot;Directly above the Bench are two central figures, depicting Majesty of the Law and Power of Government. Between them is a tableau of the Ten Commandments&hellip;&quot;
<div>
<div>Further research produced information that in 1987 the building was designated a National Historic Landmark, and came under control of the U.S. Department of the Interior, and under the new management the handbook was rewritten in 1988. The Ten Commandments reference was left out of that edition, and nothing replaced it.
<div>The next reference found said only the frieze &quot;symbolizes early written laws&quot; and then in 1999, the reference first appeared to that depiction being the &quot;Ten Amendments to the Bill of Rights.&quot;
<div>&quot;The more I got into it (his research), the more I saw Christianity had been abandoned from history,&quot; he told WND.
<div>When he asked, his recent tour guide denied there were any Ten Commandments representations in the Supreme Court building, he said.
<div>
<div>Such denial, he said, left him stunned.
<div>One who was not surprised by the circumstances, however, was Judge Roy Moore, a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/archives.asp?AUTHOR_ID=273">WND columnist</a> and the former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court. He was removed from office on a federal judge's order because he refused to remove a depiction of the Ten Commandments from the Alabama courthouse.
<div>&quot;They've distorted history to come up with their own version of things,&quot; Moore told WND. What such changes do, he said, &quot;is divorce ourselves from an understanding of where our rights come from.&quot;
<div>Without rights coming from God, he noted, government &quot;assumes control over everything, including what you think.&quot;
<div>&quot;Why would they say the Ten Commandments weren't there? They had to come up with something. I could see the progressive disappearance of the word 'commandment' from their literature,&quot; said DuBord.
<div>He had just returned from a trip to Turkey, where ancient Ephesus is.
<div>&quot;The tour guide was Muslim, and went on to say, with all respect to all of you, I need to say something to you about the Apostle Paul. ... And he went into an apologetic of Paul's teachings.&quot;
<div>&quot;He told us, 'These things happened here,'&quot; DuBord said.
<div>But then to return to the U.S. and find Christianity edited from history left him almost speechless.
<div>&quot;I thought, we started as a Christian nation, and we can't even get this here.&quot;
<div>DeBord also noted that during his research of the &quot;Weinman letter,&quot; he found another memorial in Washington, &quot;The Oscar Solomon Memorial,&quot; noting the accomplishments of the first Jew to serve in a president's cabinet. It's on 14th Street between Pennsylvania and Constitution avenues.
<div>It also was designed by Weinman, and like the Supreme Court image, depicts a human figure leaning on the same table with Roman numerals just as the East Wall Frieze.
<div>But this time, an artist's letter confirms the tablets represent the Ten Commandments.
<div>&quot;Would Weinman have sculpted two identical tablets, in the same city, each with the Roman numerals I through V on one side and VI through X on the other, but with totally different identities?&quot; DuBord wondered. &quot;It seems very unlikely.&quot;
<div>The current information office at the Supreme Court declined to talk on the record with WND when asked about Ten Commandments representations on the building, referring questioners to the website.
<div>There, a document does indicate &quot;Moses&quot; is one of various lawgivers portrayed in the friezes, but the site doesn't mention &quot;Ten Commandments.&quot; It does mention the &quot;Ten Amendments.&quot;
<div>DuBord said he knew of other representations, such as the lower part of the inside of each of the oak doors where people enter the inner Court Chamber, where two tablets carry Roman numerals I-V and VI-X.
<div>
<div>But DuBord's tour guide said those &ndash; too &ndash; were the Ten Amendments.
<div>He then asked, &quot;If there are no other depictions of Moses or the Ten Commandments on the building except on the South Wall Frieze in the U.S. Supreme Court, then what about on the east side of the building where Moses is the central figure among others, holding both tablets of the Ten Commandments, one in each arm?&quot;
<div>&quot;Her response shocked me as much as the guide inside the Court chamber. 'There is no depiction of Moses and the Ten Commandments like that on the U.S. Supreme Court,'&quot; DuBord said he was told.
<div>He asked if there were any pictures of the representation, and she pulled one out.
<div>&quot;Her eyes widened in surprise. There was Moses in photo and description as the central figure, holding the Ten Commandments (tablets), one in each hand,&quot; DuBord wrote.
<div>Although there are six depictions of Moses and-or the Ten Commandments at the Supreme Court, the tour guides had been trained to admit to only the one on Moses, he said.
<div>One doesn't have to be Christian, or endorse Christianity, to recognize its influence in history, he said.
<div>&quot;I am &hellip; respectfully requesting that the complete educational history regarding the depictions of Moses and The Ten Commandments be rediscovered and retaught to U.S. Supreme Court guides and to the public in the U.S. Supreme Court Building,&quot; he suggested in a letter to the court. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2767</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2767</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Christianity being wiped from tales of U.S. history<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<font size="+0">By Bob Unruh<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font></font></h3>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>When Pastor Todd DuBord visited historical sites in the Washington, D.C., area recently he was thrilled with being on the site of so many events important to the founding of the United States.
<div>He, and his wife, Tracy, were on a tour that visited Jamestown, Monticello, Mt. Vernon, Ford's Theater, the Pentagon, Capitol Hill, the U.S. Supreme Court Building, the Holocaust Museum, Korean War Memorial, World War II Memorial Vietnam Memorial, Washington Memorial, Jefferson Memorial and Lincoln Memorial.
<div>But as a history buff, he noticed quickly that one influence from the nation's early years was left out &ndash; not just once or twice &ndash; but repeatedly.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>DuBord, pastor of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.lacconline.org">Lake Almanor Community Church</a> in California, said when visiting the Jamestown Museum and Settlement, and Thomas Jefferson's Monticello, he noticed any of Christianity's influences on American history were ignored, or belittled.
<div>His entire research compilation is <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.lacconline.org/supremecourt.asp">available online.</a> And he's written letters to the various organizations that manage the sites, asking them to correct the information they provide to visitors.
<div>During his visit at Jamestown, he said, the tour guides several times said the first settlers arrived in America &quot;to make money.&quot;
<div>
<div>&quot;While this is partially true, it was not only totally overstated by its emphasis and repetition, but there was absolutely no hint of the religious purpose given and stated under the Virginia Charter of 1606, which called for the 'propagating of Christian religion to such people as yet live in darkness and miserable ignorance of the true knowledge and worship of God.'&quot;
<div>He said there also was absolutely no mention of the fact the colonists' first act, after having landed at Cape Henry on April 27, 1607, &quot;was to erect a large wooden cross and hold a prayer meeting, conducted by their minister, Reverend Robert Hunt.&quot;
<div>&quot;As colonist George Percy noted back then, 'The nine and twentieth day we set up a cross at Chesupioc Bay, and named the place Cape Henry,'&quot; DuBord pointed out to the history experts.
<div>&quot;In fact, it seemed whenever there was an opportunity to address any of the religious characteristics or zeal of this first community, they were avoided,&quot; he said.
<div>Later during the tour, when visitors were being led through the very heart of the replica of the community, the Anglican Church, the guide was asked about the significance of the various religious plaques, such as the Lord's Prayer and Ten Commandments, on the wall at the front of the church.
<div>&quot;Our guide's response was that she was unable to speak about it, a clear reference to all of us that she was trained to minimize the religious aspects of the settlement. We were all appalled, and shared so with her, especially understanding that this was an educational tour and that the religious education was being eliminated from the heart of a people who were devoutly Christian,&quot; DuBord said.
<div>A similar situation developed at Monticello, Thomas Jefferson's home.
<div>
<div>&quot;Again, while our guide was cordial and informative about many matters, when asked about the religious faith of Thomas Jefferson, he abruptly and actually quite arrogantly said, 'We all know Jefferson was a strict deist [a person who believes in a Creator who does not involve Himself in the daily affairs of men], who ardently fought for the separation of Church and State,'&quot; DeBord wrote.
<div>&quot;His added comments left everyone believing Jefferson was essentially (what might be called today) 'a liberal democrat,' and especially one who would have never allowed any mixture of religion in government,&quot; he wrote.
<div>The facts are that Jefferson used his political position to establish churches and distribute Bibles, DeBord found. &quot;For example, in an 1803 federal Indian treaty, Jefferson willingly agreed to provide $300 to 'assist the said Kaskaskia tribe in the erection of a church' and to provide 'annually for seven years $100 towards the support of a Catholic priest.'&quot;
<div>Jefferson also set aside government lands so that Moravian missionaries might be helped in &quot;promoting Christianity.&quot; And Jefferson once was chairman of the American Bible Society.
<div>
<div>Jefferson's &quot;differences with American clergy&quot; were not about eliminating Christianity from government, but to make sure a single denomination didn't become government, DuBord said.
<div>&quot;Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus&hellip;.I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus,&quot; Jefferson said.
<div>&quot;While it is true that Jefferson was an advocate for the separation of the State from the Church, he was not attempting to neuter the government from any or all religious or even Christian influence,&quot; DuBord said history shows. &quot;Religiously speaking, Jefferson was raised Anglican (Church of England), which is partially why he (as well as others) opposed the tyranny of king, priest, or whomever.&quot;
<div>According to DuBord, Jefferson believed, as President Ronald Reagan once said:
<div><blockquote><em>&quot;I know here that you will agree with me that standing up for America also means standing up for the God who has so blessed our land. I believe this country hungers for a spiritual revival. I believe it longs to see traditional values reflected in public policy again. To those who cite the First Amendment as reason for excluding God from more and more of our institutions and everyday life, may I just say: The First Amendment of the Constitution was not written to protect the people of this country from religious values; it was written to protect religious values from government tyranny.&quot;</em>
<div>&quot;If Jefferson intended to utterly void religion from national laws and legislatures, then why would he have attended church services in the Capitol Building? (Which there were back in his day). And why would he warn our country from abandoning God with these convicting words to our nation (words now also inscribed on the wall of the Jefferson Memorial):&quot; DuBord wrote.
<div><blockquote><em>&quot;The God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever.&quot;</em>
<div>That, DuBord noted, &quot;sounds to me more like a preacher than a politician!&quot;
<div>&quot;No one can say these things and be a strict deist at the same time, because Jesus' doctrines included in the belief in the immanency of a God who will never leave us or forsake us, always willing to intervene and help us in our times of need,&quot; he said.<br />
DuBord grew up without religion, but during seven years of academic study at Bethany University and Fuller Theological Seminary accepted that the claims of Christianity are true.
<div>
<div>He's served in various prison, drug and alcohol rehab ministries and worked as a youth pastor and associate pastor before assuming his duties in Lake Almanor. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2766</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2766</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Christian Population Declines in the Holy Land </h3>
<p><br />
NewsMax.com Wires<br />
Sunday, Nov. 12, 2006 </p>
<div>BETHLEHEM, West Bank -- The death threat came on simple white fliers blowing down the streets at dawn. A group calling itself &quot;Friends of Muhammad&quot; accused a local Palestinian Christian of selling mobile phones carrying offensive sketches of the Muslim prophet.
<div>The message went on to curse all Arab Christians and Pope Benedict XVI, still struggling to calm Muslim outrage from his remarks on Islam.
<div>While neighbors defended the merchant - saying the charges in the flier were bogus - the frightened phone dealer went into hiding, feeling less than satisfied with authorities' conclusion that the Oct. 19 note was probably a harmless rant.
<div>Now the dealer is thinking of going abroad.
<div>Call it part of a modern exodus, the steady flight of the tiny Palestinian Christian minority that could lead, some predict, to the faith being virtually extinct in its birthplace within several generations - a trend mirrored in many dwindling pockets of Christianity across the Islamic world.
<div>This is one of the major themes the pope is expected to carry to Turkey for a four-day visit beginning Nov. 28 - his first papal visit to a predominantly Muslim nation. The Vatican calls it &quot;reciprocity:&quot; Muslim demands for greater sensitivity from the West must be accompanied by stronger protections and rights for Christian minorities.
<div>In some places, such as Pakistan, it means more safeguards from extremist attacks. In Indonesia and elsewhere, it touches on appeals to quell growing sectarian clashes. In Turkey, Iraq and the rest of the Middle East, it seeks to preserve communities dating back to the time when Jesus and his apostles preached.
<div>But nearly everywhere in Muslim lands, Christian populations are in decline.
<div>No place is this more striking than the Holy Land.
<div>For decades, it was mostly economic pressures pushing Palestinian Christians to emigrate, using family ties in the West or contacts from missionary schools. The Palestinian uprisings - and the separation barrier started by Israel in 2002 - accelerated the departures by turning once-bustling pilgrimage sites such as Bethlehem into relative ghost towns.
<div>The growing strength of radical Islamic movements has added distinct new worries. During the protests after the pope's remarks in September, some of the worst violence was in Palestinian areas with churches firebombed and hit by gunfire.
<div>&quot;Most of the Christians here are either in the process of leaving, planning to leave or thinking of leaving,&quot; said Sami Awad, executive director of the Holy Land Trust, a Bethlehem-based peace group. &quot;Insecurity is deep and getting worse.&quot;
<div>The native Palestinian Christian population has dipped below 2 percent of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Arab East Jerusalem, down from at least 15 percent in 1950 by some estimates. Meanwhile, the Muslim Palestinian birthrate is among the highest in the world.
<div>Dire predictions abound. The Franciscan Foundation for the Holy Land said Christians could become &quot;extinct&quot; in the region within 60 years.
<div>&quot;It certainly doesn't look good for us,&quot; said Mike Salman, a Palestinian Christian who has conducted studies on demographic trends.
<div>A walk along Shepherd Street puts a face to the lament.
<div>Hannah Qumsieh spends his days playing online poker, fretting about unpaid bills and trimming his lemon trees at his house overlooking the field where the Bible says an angel told shepherds of the birth of Jesus. Qumsieh retired from the Palestinian tourism office last year, but has received no pension checks since the militant faction Hamas won elections in January and the West slashed aid to the Palestinian Authority.
<div>&quot;If I had money to leave, I would,&quot; he said, casting a glance at the newly built white-stone house next door in Beit Sahour, one of the last Christian-dominated enclaves in the West Bank. Bethlehem, just up the hill, is now less than 20 percent Christian.
<div>A day earlier, Qumsieh's eldest son turned over the house keys to tenants and took his family to Chile. Down the road, a Christian restaurant owner, Ibrahim Shomali, is selling what he can before he leaves with his wife this month. They will head for Flint, Mich., to join his brother and hunt for work in one of the most economically depressed areas of America.
<div>Shomali also will leave a stack of paperwork for his lawyer, who is fighting a group that took control of land that Shomali insists has been in his family for more than a century. Christians claim Muslim gangs routinely try to seize Christian property using doctored documents, but Palestinian authorities say it's random lawlessness in areas where land deeds are not registered.
<div>&quot;Here is where Jesus was born and over there, across the hill in Jerusalem, is where he was crucified,&quot; Shomali said. &quot;We Christians now feel like we are on the cross.&quot;
<div>Some are trying to change the momentum.
<div>Groups dedicated to Muslim-Christian cooperation are active. During the protests over Benedict's remarks, militiamen from Islamic Jihad vowed to protect a West Bank church. A poll released Oct. 18 by the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion found 91 percent of respondents opposed attacking churches to protest Benedict's comments.
<div>Fuad Kokali, one of six Christian deputies in the 132-seat Palestinian parliament, proclaimed there &quot;are no religious divides&quot; in the struggle against Israeli occupation.
<div>But, after a while, he told another story. He spoke of how Muslims and Christians mixed freely at weddings and other events in the 1980s. Now, it's a rarity, he said.
<div>&quot;The world is becoming a more unstable and frightening place,&quot; he said. &quot;In these times, people revert back to their core identity. That means closing yourself within your religion and looking out at the other with suspicion.&quot;
<div>These days Palestinian Christians - dominated by Greek Orthodox and Latin rite churches loyal to the pope - face questions about whether their hearts lie in their homeland or in the West. It gets even more complicated because of the strong support for Israel and Jewish settlers from American evangelical Christians.
<div>&quot;We are stuck in no man's land,&quot; said a leading Palestinian Christian activist, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of reported death threats. &quot;In the eyes of the West, we are Arabs. In the eyes of Arabs, we are a fifth column.&quot;
<div>The choice is either stand up against Muslim radicals or doom Holy Land Christianity to a slow death, said Ayman Abuaita, a Christian leader who previously served in the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade, which has waged suicide bombings against Israelis.
<div>&quot;This is our land. This is where our faith was born,&quot; he said. &quot;We cannot be weak and just fade away.&quot;
<div>But being bold can bring a backlash.
<div>On Oct. 12, Christians students at Bir Zeit University in the West Bank protested an exhibit by an Islamic group that included artwork mocking the pontiff and a poem deriding Christianity. The argument deteriorated into a brief melee with fists and sticks.
<div>No one was seriously injured, but political and religious leaders rushed to the college to try to keep the violence from spreading - as it did in 2002 when Beit Sahour was engulfed by street battles after a Muslim man took a surreptitious photo of a Christian woman in a changing room.
<div>At the St. Theodosius Monastery, a site with a Christian history dating to the fifth century, the Greek Orthodox caretaker, Father Ierotheos, said he mostly remains behind the walls. He claims he was harassed by &quot;Muslim fanatics&quot; for speaking about Christian fears on a local television show.
<div>&quot;It's a jungle for us now,&quot; he said.
<div>Every Friday, the noontime bells from the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem ring out during prayer calls at a mosque on the other side of Manger Square.
<div>&quot;You can hear the bells and think that it is a sign that Christians will never be pushed out of this land,&quot; said Abuaita. &quot;Or you can hear it as a cry for help.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2733</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2733</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Terrorists announce plans to attack U.S.<br />
Militants declare they're preparing to 'hit Americans without mercy'<br />
<font size="+0"></font></h3>
<p><font size="+0">By Aaron Klein<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font></font></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>JERUSALEM &ndash; Four terror groups here, including militants from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party, which the U.S. considers moderate, warned today America is now officially a target for attacks both in the region and abroad.
<div>The terror groups blamed the U.S. for &quot;attacking Muslim land&quot; in Israel, Iraq and Afghanistan, and for providing support to the Israeli Defense Forces, which last week accidentally hit a residential area with artillery fire while trying to stop rockets from being launched from the northern Gaza Strip into nearby Jewish communities.
<div>Several Palestinian terror leaders in Gaza told WND their organizations will soon lead attacks against U.S. interests.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;We call upon all mujahedeen in Palestine and around the world to start hitting Americans without mercy. The Americans are destroying Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan and are bombarding our Muslim land,&quot; read a statement signed by Fatah's Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the Popular Resistance Committees, the Fatah-affiliated Abu Rish Brigades, and a new group calling itself the Brigades of the Believers.
<div>&quot;The Americans seem not to understand any language but that of blood and violence. We say the Americans have an artificial culture. It is a country that doesn't respect the blood of innocents. Americans only take into consideration the blood of the Jews,&quot; read the statement obtained by WND.
<div>The statement went on the blast the U.S. for vetoing a draft U.N. resolution yesterday condemning an ongoing Israeli military offensive in the Gaza Strip. The resolution demanded Israeli troops pull out of the territory.
<div>The IDF stepped up operations in Gaza last month following reports hundreds of tons of weapons, including advanced missiles were smuggled into the territory. Since Israel withdrew from Gaza last summers, Palestinian groups there have been regularly firing rockets into neighboring Jewish communities.
<div>The Israeli army last week used artillery shells to target a site in Beit Hanoun in the northern Gaza Strip from which Qassam rockets were fired at a nearby, populated Jewish city. The Israeli shells strayed and hit a residential area about a third of a mile from the targeted zone, killing 19 Palestinians. IDF sources said the army was investigating if the wrong coordinates were fed to the artillery unit and whether the error was human or technical.
<div>Israel's Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni expressed regret for the deaths, saying Israel did not set out to harm innocent civilians.
<div>Prime Minister Ehud Olmert apologized for the Palestinian deaths and called for immediate peace talks with Abbas, stating the Palestinian leader &quot;will be surprised at how far I am willing to go.&quot;
<div>Olmert said he is willing to free &quot;many, many Palestinian prisoners.&quot;
<div>U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton said yesterday the U.S. was &quot;disturbed&quot; by the Arab-backed draft resolution concerning Israel's Gaza raid, calling the draft &quot;biased against Israel and politically motivated&quot;.
<div>&quot;This resolution does not display an evenhanded characterization of the recent events in Gaza, nor does it advance the cause of Israeli-Palestinian peace,&quot; Bolton said.
<div><strong>'Americans will very soon be subjected to our plans'</strong>
<div>Meanwhile Palestinian terror groups said their organizations will lead attacks against the U.S.
<div>Abu Ahmed, a senior leader of the Al Aqsa Brigades in Gaza, told WND, &quot;We asked the Palestinian people and the mujahedeen to target Americans. American targets will very soon be subjected to our military plans inside Israel and the territories. We are still deciding whether to only target U.S. interests in Palestine or also abroad.&quot;
<div>Abu Ahmed said some cells of the Al Aqsa Brigades don't support the call to target Americans, but the majority of the Brigades agree the U.S. should be attacked.
<div>&quot;Most members (of the Brigades) will participate in attacks within Israel and the territories even if some members of our organization don't like this new development (of targeting Americans),&quot; Abu Ahmed said.
<div>The Al Aqsa Brigades is the declared &quot;military wing&quot; of Abbas' Fatah party. Abu Ahmed is a member of Fatah, which the U.S. largely considers moderate. The U.S. has provided large sums of aid, weaponry and advanced military training to Fatah militants.
<div>Abu Abir, spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees, an umbrella of major Palestinian terror groups, told WND his group would target Americans anywhere, including abroad.
<div>&quot;We will reach Americans either inside or outside. We will not hesitate to target the U.S.,&quot; Abu Abir said.
<div>The Committees spokesman claimed the U.S. was using Israel to test weapons on Palestinian civilians.
<div>&quot;We have proof of American involvement in Beit Hanoun last week. Every weapon the Americans create, they first give to the Israelis to examine on innocent Palestinian civilians. The U.S. will pay a price for this,&quot; Abu Abir said.
<div>The Committees previously attacked U.S. interests here. In 2003, it bombed an American convoy in Gaza, killing three U.S. contractors.
<div>Abu Abir's comments followed a statement last week by Hamas also blaming the U.S. for Palestinian deaths. The statement warned of upcoming Hamas attacks against the U.S. and urged Arabs and Muslims to &quot;teach the American enemy merciless lessons they will not forget.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2732</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2732</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Christian Club Wins Equal Access Case Against Plano Independent Schools<br />
</h3>
<div>By Allie Martin<br />
November 10, 2006</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - A federal judge has ruled against a Dallas, Texas-area school district in a case involving a Christian student club that was denied equal access by school officials. Liberty Legal Institute, a pro-family law firm that often takes cases involving civil liberties and religious freedom violations, represented the student group.</div>
<div>Earlier this year, students at a middle school in Plano Independent School District asked administrators for permission to form a Christian club called Students Witnessing Absolute Truth, or S.W.A.T. The club was approved but was not allowed to receive official recognition or to place a listing on the school website.</div>
<div>Liberty Legal Institute filed a lawsuit on the Christian students' behalf. On April 21, Judge Don D. Bush issued a recommendation for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the Plano Independent School District (Plano ISD) from any further discrimination and ordering the district to provide equal benefits and privileges to S.W.A.T. Remarking on the case, the judge described the school district's actions with regard to the Christian club as a &quot;flagrant&quot; violation of the students' rights.</div>
<div>Attorney Kelly Shackelford, Liberty Legal Institute's chief counsel, feels the judge's ruling in <em>S.W.A.T. v. Plano ISD </em>is a solid one. &quot;The judge said that clearly, under the law -- both the Constitution and the Equal Access Act -- you have to treat student groups the same,&quot; he says, &quot;and that religious student groups and religious students cannot be discriminated against because they're Christian or because they're religious.&quot;</div>
<div>Shackelford points out that all the Christian club members wanted was to be treated fairly, and the court's ruling should ensure that. &quot;We now have a judgment in their favor,&quot; he says, &quot;and we've got these kids ... being treated well in that their website is back up, and they're being treated the same as everybody else.&quot;</div>
<div>But besides securing their own rights, the pro-family lawyer notes, the S.W.A.T. members' case has helped pave the way for others facing religious discrimination to assert their rights as well. Thanks to those courageous Christian students and their principled fight, he asserts, &quot;every other kid ... and every other group who wants to live out their faith in the area and the district now has protection, because they were willing to stand.&quot;</div>
<em>
<div>S.W.A.T. v. Plano ISD </div>
<div>Shackelford sees the S.W.A.T. members' win as a major victory; however, he says he only wishes he could say the district had learned its lesson and would stop violating the law. &quot;Unfortunately, I know they are still fighting the rights of numerous students on the Morgan case,&quot; the Liberty Legal Institute spokesman observes, &quot;and so we have more work to do.&quot; He says he wonders how many rulings it will take &quot;to get the district to sit down with us and stop these violations.&quot;</div>
<div>Discriminating against students or groups because of their faith is not the law -- it is illegal, Shackelford insists. Under the law, he says, religious student groups have the same rights and deserve the same benefits that every other student group enjoys.</div>
</em>was filed in the Federal District Court in Sherman, Texas. That is the same court in which another matter involving the school district's handling of student expressions of faith, <em>Morgan et al., v. Plano ISD</em>, is currently in litigation. In that case, a student was prohibited from distributing religious-themed gifts, including candy canes.]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2691</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2691</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>      </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>GoBible Gives New Meaning to the Term 'Pocket Testament'<br />
iPod-Type Device Allows Christians to 'Plug Into God Without Unplugging from Life' </h3>
<div>By John Clemens<br />
November 10, 2006</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - Surveys have estimated that only 39 percent of Christians read the Bible in other locations outside the church. Now a &quot;new media&quot; consumer product has been introduced that will make it easier for Christians to hear the Scriptures -- even when they're too busy to read.</div>
<div>The GoBible&Ocirc; , a device that will fit into the palm of a hand, a shirt pocket, or purse, is preloaded with 75 hours of audio of the entire Bible. The hand-held device features an interactive screen that allows the listener to scroll through the Old and New Testament and search by the book, chapter, or verse.</div>
<div>GoBible is the brain child of Andrew Block, president and CEO of GoBible, LLC. &quot;For the first time,&quot; says Block, &quot;the user will be able to go into the audio version of the Bible at the verse level because most other [electronic] versions of the Bible have been only to the chapter level.&quot;</div>
<div>The New King James Version on GoBible is narrated by Stephen Johnston, who has been narrating and producing television, radio and audio Bible products since 1981. In the past two decades, more than 100 million cassettes, CDs, and DVDs of his narrations and productions have been sold around the world. Johnston recently won the National Silver Microphone award for his narration and production of the Civil War documentary <em>Shiloh</em>.</div>
<div>The King James Version is narrated by Alexander Scourby (1913-1985), who is best known for his precise, mellifluous voice featured on some of the most beloved literary works for countless Christians over the years. </div>
<strong>
<div>A Seed Planted</div>
<div>&quot;You know, there is one book that people do read over and over again and that's the Bible,&quot; he says. &quot;And I thought if you could provide the same kind of easy-to-use and searchable way for the Bible, like you do through a music catalog is for something like an I-pod, then why not the Holy Bible,&quot; said Block. </div>
<div>Block also thought of the concern that many Christians have when they are called on to pronounce difficult names and places from the Scriptures. &quot;For people who have trouble with some of the names of the Bible -- especially in the Old Testament -- they'll be able to hear the narrator say those words over and over again because they hit the repeat button and go back to the word in question; so over time, they'll be able to pick up on those names, too,&quot; he explains.</div>
<div>In the past many Christians who enjoyed listening to the Bible either lost or discovered one of their tapes or CDs had been damaged by using the audio over and over again. Block says that can't happen with the GoBible. &quot;We basically took all the hours of the Bible and condensed the Scriptures into a small, permanent product that allows the user to easily carry it around rather than [having to carry around] something that was bulky and easily lost,&quot; he shares.</div>
<div>And Block says the GoBible is not intended to replace the time Christians should spend in God's Word. &quot;We don't necessarily see this as a replacement for people reading the Bible,&quot; he says, &quot;but we see it more as a supplement for people who don't always have the time to read the Bible and be able to experience His Word.&quot;</div>
<strong>
<div>Users Like It</div>
<div>Christian radio broadcaster Diana Kay of Dallas was one of the first people to try the GoBible. She shares that she found the topic index feature very helpful.</div>
<div>&quot;I enjoyed 200 of the most popular stories of the Bible and used the topic index to find the Scriptures that focused on subjects like Christ's love, doubt, despair, courage, mercy, and salvation,&quot; Kay says. &quot;I see this as another step for completing The Great Commission.&quot;</div>
<div>In addition to the topic index, the GoBible also allows the listener to go right to certain stories in the Bible -- such as the Beginning, Nebuchadnezzar's dream, Jesus presented to the temple, crossing the Jordan, the fall of Jericho, and the calling of the first disciples.</div>
<div>A listener selecting &quot;Special Features&quot; from GoBible's main menu will also have an opportunity to select the &quot;Bible-in-a-Year&quot; option. Block sees that as an advantage for believers who find that the busy-ness of their day sometimes makes it difficult to sit down and read the Word.</div>
<div>&quot;We have a program on the GoBible that allows someone to listen to 12 to 15 minutes of different chapters every day, so by the end of a year they'll be able to have listened to the entire Bible,&quot; says Block. Creators of the GoBible say Christians will now be able to schedule the Word of God even on the busiest of days.</div>
</strong><br />
According to Block, many Christians who already have used the GoBible say they enjoy the portability. &quot;They tell us they can use it [while] walking the dog, or rocking in a chair on their front porch outside, or driving their car to work, or cleaning the house, or on an airplane ... just about any place you can imagine,&quot; says Block.</strong><br />
Block originally got the idea to produce the GoBible after watching his 75-year-old father using an I-pod.]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2690</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2690</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Calif. Campus Group Bans Pledge at Meetings</h3>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Student leaders at California's Orange Coast College have banned the Pledge of Allegiance at their meetings, Reuters reported.</div>
<div>More than 28,000 students attend the community college located just south of Los Angeles.</div>
<div>Jason Bell, an elected student trustee, proposed the ban. He said the trustees didn't want to publicly vow loyalty to the American flag or government.</div>
<div>&quot;Loyalty ought to be something the government earns through performance,&quot; he said, &quot;not through reciting a pledge.&quot;</div>
<div>Bell also objected to the phrase &quot;under God.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;That part is sort of offensive to me,&quot; he said. &quot;I am an atheist and a socialist, and if you know your history, you know that 'under God' was inserted during the McCarthy era and was directly designed to destroy my ideology.&quot;</div>
<div>Martha Parham, spokeswoman for the school, said campus officials haven't taken a position on the ban.</div>
<div>&quot;If their personal belief is that they don't want to say the Pledge of Allegiance,&quot; she said, &quot;the district certainly isn't going to dictate what they do.&quot;</div>
<div>Christine Zoldos, a political science major at the school, was angry about the decision and, in spite of the new rule, stood in front of the group to recite the pledge at a Wednesday meeting.</div>
<div>&quot;America is the one thing I'm passionate about, and I can't let them take that away from me,&quot; she said. &quot;The fact that they have enough power to ban one of the most valued traditions in America is just horrible.&quot;</div>
<div>Zoldos plans to attend all future meetings to salute the flag.<br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2689</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2689</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>FCC: Unscripted Profanity OK on News Programs</h3>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>Agency reverses its earlier finding.</em>
<div>
<div>The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reversed itself this week and ruled that profanity can be used on news programs -- but still not on awards shows or entertainment programs. </div>
<div>The agency reversed an earlier ruling concerning an incident on CBS' The Early Show in which a Survivor contestant uttered a foul word in an interview. The FCC had said it violated indecency rules, but now said news programs have an exemption.</div>
<div>At the same time, the FCC upheld its decision that profanities used by winners and presenters in the 2003 Billboard Music Awards qualified as indecent. </div>
<div>&quot;Hollywood continues to argue they should be able to say the F-word on television whenever they want,&quot; Chairman Kevin Martin said. &quot;The commission again disagrees.&quot; </div>
<div>Pat Trueman, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, said the FCC is following the rules. </div>
<div>&ldquo;The FCC is showing some balance, and at the same time it&rsquo;s cracking down on Hollywood and telling Hollywood you&rsquo;re not going to get away with flooding America&rsquo;s airwaves with whatever you want.&rdquo; </div>
<div>Trueman said news programs are off the hook because some comments aren&rsquo;t planned and can't be anticipated.</div>
<div>&ldquo;When it&rsquo;s planned, it&rsquo;s a violation of federal law,&quot; he said. &quot;When it is not expected, not planned, the FCC can say that there&rsquo;s no violation of the indecency law.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Still, Bob Peters, president of Morality in Media, is concerned that news programs may take advantage of the clarification.</div>
<div>&ldquo;That doesn&rsquo;t mean that ABC, CBS, NBC can start cursing up a storm,&quot; he said, &quot;and doing even worse things during so-called news programs.&rdquo;<br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2688</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2688</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Missionary says Christian church meets '3 or 4' at a time<br />
People 'cover windows, send children outside' before discussing faith<br />
<br />
</h3>
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>A veteran of more than 100 missions into North Korea to provide ministry to Christians and non-Christians alike says the first thing to do in any meeting there is to close and cover all the windows and send the children outside.
<div>The description of the persecution under which North Korean Christians suffer comes from &quot;Roli,&quot; whose story was reported by <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.persecution.com">The Voice of the Martyrs,</a> a worldwide ministry that directs its aid to members of the persecuted Christian church.
<div>That organization earlier reported on the faith of a teen-ager who was caught teaching about Christ, and died in a North Korean prison camp to leave behind a witness that continues there even today. It also reported on the stunning change in a prison warden who watched that teen's final days and sought out what made the teen strong.
<div><em>(Story continues below)</em>
<div>
<div>&quot;When we gather together we close all of the windows and all of the blinds,&quot; Roli described. &quot;We don't have curtains over there but somehow we cover up the windows and we send all of the children outside. You cannot gather with many people &hellip; maybe three or four.
<div>&quot;We pray together, we sing praises, and then we read John 3:16-18. We also read I Corinthians 1:18-26. We talk from Genesis. We say that man was created from dust, so we have to believe in Jesus to go to heaven.&quot;
<div>The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom repeatedly has recommended that the U.S. Department of State list North Korea among its &quot;countries of particular concern&quot; for its &quot;egregious and systematic human rights violations&quot; including policies that disallow any Christian faith.
<div>There are estimates of tens thousands of Christians detained in prison camps just for their faith. Sometimes entire families are imprisoned because of a statement from just one member, reports said.
<div>Roli knows the risks are high: four of her Christian friends so far have been executed because of their witness. She was arrested herself, and has spent time in those prison camps.
<div>&quot;I once gave one Bible to four people,&quot; she said. &quot;Later, while I was in prison one of the four came in and said, 'You are giving out Bibles.' I told them, 'Yes, I am a believer. I brought this book so we could read it together.'&quot;
<div>But those questioning her thought she was a foreign spy, and demanded that she say the Lord's Prayer to prove her identity.
<div>&quot;I did a lot of stuttering,&quot; Roli said. &quot;I made a lot of mistakes. I was a little nervous.&quot;
<div>But four days later, she was released with a warning not to come back.
<div>&quot;When I first started this work I was nervous and I would be afraid and when I came back I would say, 'This is dangerous work' and 'I am not going to do it anymore.' But when I think of the people in North Korea I change my mind and I decide to go back again,&quot; she said.
<div>Roli's trips into North Korea, where she's developed an extensive network of house meeting locations, have shown her that no level of repression will kill the Christian spirit.
<div>&quot;People are less afraid. (Christians) are becoming bolder to share the gospel. They know Kim Il Sung is not the one that has saved them and not the one who is feeding them. They are starting to believe in God. Many people are coming to faith.&quot;
<div>She would love to talk to the children, too, but cannot, yet.
<div>Before sharing any witness in a home she insists the children are sent outside.
<div>&quot;A slip of the tongue at school, and children could accidentally inform on their own parents,&quot; the report said. &quot;The parents could be arrested, or worse. Parents consider very carefully when their children can be trusted to know that their parents are Christians, traitorous outlaws in the eyes of their government.&quot;
<div>Voice of the Martyrs is a non-profit, interdenominational ministry working worldwide to help Christians who are persecuted for their faith, and to educate the world about that persecution. Its headquarters are in Bartlesville, Okla., and it has 30 affiliated international offices.
<div>It was launched by the late Richard and Sabina Wurmbrand, who started smuggling Russian Gospels into Russia in 1947, just months before Richard was abducted and imprisoned in Romania where he was tortured for his refusal to recant Christianity.
<div>He eventually was released in 1964 and the next year he testified about the persecution of Christians before the U.S. Senate's Internal Security Subcommittee, stripping to the waist to show the deep torture wound scars on his body.
<div>The group that later was renamed The Voice of the Martyrs was organized in 1967, when his book, &quot;Tortured for Christ,&quot; was released. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2687</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2687</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Supreme Court Holds Hearings on National Partial-Birth Abortion Ban </h3>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
November 8</em><em>, 2006</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>The Supreme Court held hearings on Wednesday on the federal partial-birth abortion ban that would prohibit the gruesome abortion procedure across the country. As expected, the high court grappled with the question of whether the three-day-long abortion procedure is ever medically necessary.
<div>Despite the claims, abortion advocates could not tell the high court how often a partial-birth abortion may be needed to protect a mother's health.</div>
<div>&quot;We have no evidence in the record&quot; as to how often such a situation arises? Chief Justice John Roberts asked, according to an AP report.</div>
<div>&quot;No, your honor,&quot; pro-abortion attorney Priscilla Smith responded.<br />
<br />
Solicitor General Paul Clement told the court that &quot;Partial-birth abortions are never medically necessary, pose health risks, and should be banned.&quot;</div>
<div>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who has previously voted to reject a ban on partial-birth abortions, asked Solicitor General Paul Clement whether the partial-birth abortion ban would also prohibit other abortion procedures as well.</div>
<div>&quot;I don't think so, Justice Ginsburg,&quot; Clement replied and said that it was different than a type of abrotion procedure the Supreme Court addressed in the Danforth case.<br />
<br />
He said the big difference between partial-birth abortions and other abortion procedures is that the baby is killed partially outside the mother's womb in partial-birth abortions while the child is destoyed inside the womb in other procedures.</div>
<div>&quot;I just don't think the record supports&quot; that notion, Clement added when Ginsburg asked him if the partial-birth abortion procedure was too close to another one and that the ban could wind up prohibiting both.</div>
<div>Justice Samuel Alito replaced former Justice Sanda Day O'Connor, who was the deciding vote in the Supreme Court's decision in 2000 that struck down a Nebraska ban on partial-birth abortions because it lacked a health exception.</div>
<div>Alito, who is expected to be more receptive, sat silently during the two hour hearing and did not ask any questions of either side.</div>
<div>Only eight of the nine justices participated in the hearings and Chief Justice John Roberts told those attending that Justice Clarence Thomas was ill and unable to attend. </div>
<div>Assuming new Roberts and Alito side with Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, the Supreme Court has a 5-4 majority in favor of Roe and keeping abortion legal. However, the decision on the partial-birth abortion may be different.</div>
<div>That's because Justice Anthony Kennedy, sides with the pro-abortion bloc of judges on abortion in general, ruled with the minority in 2000 to uphold the Nebraska ban. Both sides admit that Kennedy's decision in the case will determine whether the law is upheld.</div>
<div>President Bush signed the national partial-birth abortion ban into law in 2003 and abortion advocates took it to court in three separate lawsuits and federal courts in each case relied on the Supreme Court's decision in 2000 and declared the ban unconstitutional.</div>
<div>In July, the Eighth Circuit upheld the decision issued by the district court in Nebraska; then in February, the Second Circuit and the Ninth Circuit upheld the decisions of their respective district courts.</div>
<div>The U. S. Supreme Court has agreed to review President Bush's appeal of the Eighth Circuit decision, Carhart v. Gonzales; and the Ninth Circuit case, Planned Parenthood v. Gonzales.</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2686</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2686</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Possible Supreme Court Retirement Shakes Up Election Last Minute </h3>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
November 6</em><em>, 2006</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>Speculation that a pro-abortion member of the Supreme Court may be planning to step down soon is providing a last-minute shake up in a hotly contested Congressional election that is expected to go down to the wire. The head of a judicial watchdog group says political observers believe Justice John Paul Stevens may retire.
<div>Stevens, an 86 year-old judge appointed in 1975, has been battling health problems and several reports have appeared in recent days that his health has taken a turn for the worse.</div>
<div>Stevens is a member of the five justice bloc of judges on the high court who back legalized abortion and his retirement could potentially pave the way for the confirmation of a justice who could be the deciding vote in overturning Roe v. Wade.</div>
<div>However, should Democrats capture control of the Senate tomorrow, President Bush would likely have a tough time securing the nomination of a justice would strictly interpret the Constitution and not read a so-called right to abortion into it.</div>
<div>Sean Rushton, the executive director of the Committee for Justice, writes about the Stevens retirement possibility in a national editorial yesterday.</div>
<div>&quot;It points out what could be a once-in-a-lifetime chance for the 20-year movement to recast the court with a constitutionalist majority,&quot; Rushton said.</div>
<div>Rushton urged voters to consider the potential for a Stevens retirement when they vote and to keep control of Congress in pro-life hands.</div>
<div>&quot;It would be a cruel twist indeed for conservatives to 'teach Republicans a lesson' Tuesday, only to be taught a lesson themselves within months when new Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) leads a Democratic majority against the most important Supreme Court nominee in <br />
decades,&quot; he said.<br />
<br />
Pro-life groups are warning voters that they need to keep the possibility in mind.<br />
<br />
&quot;President Bush was able to appoint two new constitutionalist Justices since 2004 because pro-lifers were the majority in Congress,&quot; Susan B. Anthony List director Marjorie Dannenfelser wrote pro-life advocates Monday.<br />
<br />
&quot;Just as in 2004, the Supreme Court is at stake again. The control of the Senate up for grabs again,&quot; she wrote. &quot;Give President Bush a Senate that will confirm a pro-life justice to the Supreme Court.&quot;</div>
<div>Meanwhile, Rushton reminded votes of the fate of pro-life Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork, who lost a heated nomination battle after the Senate changed from Republican to Democratic hands in 1986.</div>
<div>&quot;The rumor should focus the mind not only on whether the Senate will remain majority-Republican, but by how much,&quot; Rushton wrote.</div>
<div>He pointed out how large Democratic gains on Tuesday could threaten the bipartisan group of moderate Republicans and conservative Democrats who made sure recent nominees John Roberts and Samuel Alito did not face filibusters.</div>
<div>Whether Stevens is headed for a retirement soon or not, Rushton said pro-life voters should keep it in mind because it's always a possibility and there are two years before voters can undo the loses that might occur Tuesday.</div>
<div>&quot;Even if the rumor turns out to be unfounded, it is worth repeating because it crystallizes the reality that there will soon be another high court vacancy,&quot; he writes. &quot;Senators elected next Tuesday to six year terms will, assuredly, vote on the confirmation of at least one new Supreme Court justice before their term is out.&quot;</div>
<div>The message appears to be getting to voters however, as Rushton says President Bush has been mentioning the topic of judges in his campaign stops across the nation and it has been getting a strong response from audiences.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2628</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2628</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Christian Student Challenges Missouri State Over Free Speech</h3>
<div>from staff reports</div>
<div>
<div><em>She says a professor coerced her to write a letter in support of gay adoption.</em>
<div>
<div>Missouri State University is in court after punishing a Christian student who refused to write a letter to the state Legislature in support of gay adoption.</div>
<div>Emily Brooker says she refused the project because she opposes gay adoption, but her professor ignored her objections and wrote her up.</div>
<div>David French, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund who is representing Brooker, said her First Amendment rights were egregiously violated.</div>
<div>&ldquo;She was brought up on charges for among other things an insufficient commitment to diversity,&quot; he told Family News in Focus. &ldquo;She was then punished by the university in a Star-Chamber type proceeding, where her professors asked her if she thought they were sinners, if she thought gays and lesbians were sinners.&rdquo;</div>
<div>John Black, a spokesman for the university, said the school is initiating an investigation.</div>
<div>&ldquo;The university is committed to practicing principles of free inquiry and expression,&quot; he said, &quot;and maintenance of non-coercive learning environments.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said this case is not the ordinary First Amendment challenge.</div>
<div>&ldquo;Coerced speech is anathema, Hausknecht said. &quot;It is the absolute antithesis of what the First Amendment is there to protect.&rdquo;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2627</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2627</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>      </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Court halts N.C. school district policy used to prohibit student from distributing &ldquo;Day of Truth&rdquo; cards </h3>
<div><em>ADF attorneys represent student at Midway High School </em><br />
<strong>Related Links</strong></div>
<div>
<div id="ContentViewer1_spnContent">
<div id="divLinks">
<div>
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/news/story.aspx?cid=3838">ADF attorneys seek justice for high school student silenced on Day of Truth </a></div>
</div>
</div>
WILMINGTON, N.C. &mdash; A federal judge today issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Sampson County Board of Education and Midway High School officials from enforcing two policies used to prohibit a student from distributing &ldquo;Day of Truth&rdquo; message cards to other students. Officials prohibited the student, represented by attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund, from distributing the cards outside of class time during the event April 27 and suspended him from school. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;Christian students are entitled to the same First Amendment rights as other students. No student should be suspended for exercising those rights,&rdquo; said ADF Senior Legal Counsel David Cortman. &ldquo;The court&rsquo;s ruling today prohibits the school district, while the case moves forward, from censoring a student flyer simply because it has religious content.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s clearly unconstitutional when students participating in the Day of Silence, which supports the homosexual agenda, observe their event by distributing flyers and so forth, but a student with an opposite perspective is prevented from communicating it during non-instructional time,&rdquo; Cortman added. <br />
<br />
The order issued today by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Southern Division, in the case Arthurs v. Sampson County Board of Education can be read at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/ArthursPIorder.pdf">www.telladf.org/UserDocs/ArthursPIorder.pdf</a>. <br />
<br />
ADF attorneys filed suit against the board of education in May after district officials stated that distribution of religious literature was barred because Arthurs would be &ldquo;pushing his religion on others&rdquo; and &ldquo;religion is not allowed in school&rdquo; (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/news/story.aspx?cid=3838">www.telladf.org/news/story.aspx?cid=3838</a>). <br />
<br />
The Day of Truth, which presents a different viewpoint on homosexual behavior, is held on the day after the Day of Silence. The Day of Silence event, promoted by the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network, encourages students to remain silent throughout an entire day to express their support for the homosexual agenda. <br />
<br />
ADF is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. <br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2618</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2618</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>State Stings Lottery Ticket Vendors For Sales To Minors</h3>
<div>
<div><strong>WILMINGTON, N.C. -- </strong>Lottery ticket vendors across the state got slap on the wrist from regulators who sent in teenagers to play the games and found they were able to buy tickets at dozens of stores _ though it's against the law.</div>
<div>
<div>A two-month investigation by state Alcohol Law Enforcement agents resulted in 91 misdemeanor citations for stores that sold tickets to customers under 18.</div>
<div>The agency sent teens to buy tickets in August and September at more than 300 stores with lottery vending contracts. They were told to carry their real identification and be honest about their age if asked.</div>
<div>At 91 stores _ 28.6 percent of the locations checked _ clerks sold them tickets. Ten of the citations issued went to managers and owners.</div>
<div>&quot;It hasn't clicked yet that this is a truly statutorily age-restricted product,&quot; said ALE chief Mike Robertson, who believes better training is needed.</div>
<div>Tom Shaheen, director of the N.C. Education Lottery, said he believes employees just need to become more used to dealing with the rules.</div>
<div>&quot;We are very concerned about this issue,&quot; he said. &quot;But we also believe the problem will decline over time.&quot;</div>
<div>Nevertheless, the lottery will now suspend ticket vendors who sell to minors a second time and will pull licenses for a third infraction.</div>
<div>Vendors have also been reminded of the law by hand-delivered letter and e-mail.</div>
<div>Selling a lottery ticket to a minor is a class 1 misdemeanor. Individuals with clean records could be sentenced to up to 45 days of community service.</div>
<div>One store manager said her clerk simply wasn't diligent enough.</div>
<div>&quot;She did card the person. She didn't look at the month _ she just looked at the year,&quot; said Pam Soles, manager of Time Saver No. 4 food store in Whiteville. &quot;The person was just a few days&quot; shy of turning 18, she said.</div>
<div>She said the episode has made her staff more vigilant.</div>
<div>&quot;All of my employees are aware they have to card, even for the lottery,&quot; she said.</div>
<div>State lawmakers who created the lottery last year restricted ticket sales to adults. Each ticket is marked on the back:: &quot;You must be 18 years of age to play.&quot;</div>
<div>Lottery ticket sellers were told that rule during training sessions before the games were launched last spring. But the information was among thousands of facts shared with the workers.</div>
<div>Robertson said retailers need more specific reminders, and their employees should receive instruction in the law that mirrors the training they receive for alcohol and cigarette sales.</div>
<div>&quot;It should be the same ID check,&quot; Robertson said.</div>
<div>He noted that the licenses of young North Carolina drivers are bordered in red: &quot;Our saying is: 'If it's red, the sale is dead.'&quot;</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2617</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2617</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>      </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><font color="#000000" size="4"><strong>ELECTION 06: Marriage: the courts vs. the people</strong></font> <br />
<font color="#000000" size="2">By Richard Land <br />
Nov 3, 2006 </font></p>
<p>NASHVILLE, Tenn. (BP)--It has probably not escaped your attention that many in the media are portraying conservatives&rsquo; convictional consternation over the New Jersey Supreme Court ruling on same-sex &ldquo;marriage&rdquo; as demagoguery.<br />
<br />
Suggesting that citizens in the states where constitutional amendments on marriage are on the ballot are being energized by this outrageously activist court ruling as a result of demagoguery and a get-out-the-vote ploy demeans millions of Americans&rsquo; deeply felt moral convictions. (It also ignores the fact that traditional marriage supporters had nothing to do with the timing or make-up of the court&rsquo;s decision.)<br />
<br />
It is not demagoguery to point out that for the second time in three years a state Supreme Court (Massachusetts being the first) has dictated to the people&rsquo;s elected representatives and the people themselves that &quot;gay marriage&quot; or its equivalent become the law of their state, even if two-thirds or more of the citizenry are opposed to such action. What better illustration of &ldquo;judicial activism&rdquo; could one furnish? <br />
<br />
In all fairness, the New Jersey court did not go as far as did the Massachusetts high court in November 2003, when it imposed &quot;same-sex marriage&rdquo; on the Bay State. The New Jersey Supreme Court, recognizing that to follow the Massachusetts court&rsquo;s lead would prompt an enormous backlash, said the New Jersey Constitution required equal treatment for all.<br />
<br />
Their decision, in part, reads: &ldquo;Although courts can insure equal treatment for all, they cannot guarantee social acceptance which must come through the evolving ethos of a maturing society.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Translation: We can read election results, and we know the people have rejected this issue in the 20 states where it has been on the ballot.<br />
<br />
The New Jersey Supreme Court is telling the people&rsquo;s elected representatives what laws they must write. It is worth noting that this is the same court that in a 7-0 ruling in 1999 decreed that Boy Scout troops could not exclude homosexuals from serving as scoutmasters, a decision overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2000.<br />
<br />
Democracy means government &ldquo;of the people, by the people, and for the people,&rdquo; not government &ldquo;of the courts, by the courts, and for the courts.&rdquo; The New Jersey Supreme Court&rsquo;s action in dictating to the state&rsquo;s legislative body can only be remedied by one action -- an amendment to the state&rsquo;s constitution.<br />
<br />
The legal formula is simple: courts trump legislatures and laws, constitutions trump courts.<br />
<br />
If New Jersey had the kind of amendment to its constitution that citizens in eight states (Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin) will have the opportunity to approve on Nov. 7, then the New Jersey Supreme Court could not have assumed their dictatorial power and undermined the people&rsquo;s right to determine their own social policies regarding marriage.<br />
<br />
Following a lecture I gave at Harvard University in the spring of 2005, I was asked by a coed: &ldquo;Dr. Land, you seem like a nice guy. Why would you want to interfere in the personal, private relationship of two people?&rdquo; <br />
<br />
I responded by asking how she ever got the idea that marriage is a &ldquo;personal, private relationship.&rdquo; Marriage is a social and civic institution with profound public and societal responsibilities, obligations, and consequences. That is why every society in human history has regulated severely who can get married to whom and under what circumstances. Societies give &ldquo;benefits&rdquo; to marriage that they do not give to other relationships precisely because of its profound impact on society, particularly when it comes to the rearing of children. Such &ldquo;benefits&rdquo; are not rights, but benefits conferred upon marriage because of its importance to society.<br />
<br />
When the courts try to force &quot;same-sex marriage&quot; on Americans, their judicial overreach threatens the nation&rsquo;s social fabric. <br />
<br />
Even U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court&rsquo;s most liberal member, has acknowledged that the judicial activism of Roe v. Wade (1973) made the abortion issue far more contentious than it would have been had its regulation been left to the people&rsquo;s elected representatives.<br />
<br />
The Civil Rights Movement was the most successful social revolution of the last half century because it was a legislative, rather than judicial, revolution. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. changed hearts and minds. This was reflected in the Civil Rights Acts of 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965, which were then upheld by the courts. It was the people&rsquo;s elected representatives who penned the legislation because hearts and minds had been changed. <br />
<br />
The only real exception to this is the Supreme Court&rsquo;s Brown v. Board of Education (1954) decision. It reversed the infamous Plessy v. Ferguson ruling (1896), which had provided judicial cover for the horrendous Jim Crow laws.<br />
<br />
If the proponents of &quot;same-sex marriage&quot; wish to succeed in gaining acceptance for their cause, they should follow Dr. King&rsquo;s example and take their case to the people, not seek to ram their views down the throat of the American people through judicial imperialism.<br />
<br />
The people, not the judiciary, have the right to determine what constitutes the institution of marriage.<br />
<br />
I urge all voters to consider the facts, to exercise their right to cast their ballot, and to vote their values on November 7.<br />
</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2616</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2616</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>The Big Stem Cell Research Breakthrough The Media Won't Disclose </h3>
<div><strong>by Wesley J. Smith</strong><em><br />
</em>November 4, 2006<br />
</div>
<div><em>LifeNews.com Note: Wesley J. Smith is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute and a special consultant to the Center for Bioethics and Culture. Visit his web blog at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wesleyjsmith.com/">http://www.wesleyjsmith.com</a>.</em>
<div>Did you see the size of those headlines? &quot;Stem Cells Used to Create Artificial Liver,&quot; the New York Times screamed on its front page. &quot;Breakthrough! Stem Cells to One Day Create Organ for Liver Transplant,&quot; was how the Washington Post put it. &quot;Stem Cell Breakthrough Demonstrates Viability of New Science,&quot; yelled the Los Angeles Times. &quot;Stem Cell Hope for People with Liver Disease,&quot; agreed USA Today. </div>
<div>The story was so big that Katie Couric narrated a special report, expressing her profound gratitude for the hope these dedicated stem-cell scientists had brought to suffering humanity.<br />
<br />
What's that? You didn't see those headlines? You say you somehow missed the story? </div>
<div>Well, don't blame yourself. You are not out of touch. The above headlines never appeared, the stories have not been written. </div>
<div>Don't get me wrong: The breakthrough described in the fictional headlines is real. British scientists have created an artificial liver--from scratch--using stem cells. The research does offer tremendous hope for the alleviation of human suffering. But you probably didn't hear about this amazing achievement because the stem cells the scientists used to build a human liver did not come from embryos: They came from umbilical cord blood. </div>
<div>This made their scientific achievement politically incorrect. A story that doesn't validate the stem-cell mantra that embryonic stem cells offer the &quot;best hope&quot; for future cures isn't worth much attention. Even the most important adult or umbilical cord blood stem-cell breakthroughs usually receive only minor, inside-the-paper coverage. This is the primary reason why so many people still don't know about the many advances being made on a continual basis in human research with ethical, adult and umbilical cord blood stem cells.</div>
<div><br />
HERE'S THE STORY: Two scientists from Newcastle University, Nico Forraz and Colin McGuckin, have built dime-sized human livers using stem cells found in umbilical cord blood. The livers are already sufficient for use in drug testing--perhaps in place of using some animals and humans as research subjects. The scientists believe that within five years, stem-cell generated liver tissue could be sufficiently perfected for use in treating human diseases caused by injury, disease, and alcohol abuse. Perhaps in 15 years, the technique could even be employed to manufacture whole human livers suitable for transplantation.</div>
<div>Contrast this general media's shunning of this major story with its sensationalistic reporting several weeks ago of the bogus story that scientists had obtained embryonic stem cells without destroying embryos. That story, unlike the umbilical-cord-blood-stem-cells-into-liver breakthrough, got front-page play and major television coverage. It was deemed news because it was seen as undermining President Bush's stem-cell policy.</div>
<div>Indeed, if this new breakthrough had been accomplished with embryonic stem cells instead of umbilical cord blood stem cells, the headlines would have been enormous. The second paragraph of the stories would have accused President Bush of holding up potentially life-saving cures. Notable scientists and bioethicists would have been touting the new dawn of regenerative medicine that was coming into being, despite Bush's resistance.</div>
<div>Instead, we hear the sound of silence--thanks to the news blockade that doesn't care much about stem-cell breakthroughs unless they come from destroyed embryos.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2595</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2595</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Why Does Congress Fund Planned Parenthood When It Sues on Abortion?<br />
<br />
</h3>
<div><strong>by Jay Sekulow</strong><em><br />
</em>October 31, 2006<br />
</div>
<div><em>LifeNews.com Note: Jay Sekulow is the chief counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice.</em>
<div>In just a little over a week, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in two cases involving the constitutionality of Congress&rsquo;s ban on partial-birth abortion. We filed briefs in both cases representing members of the House and Senate who sponsored the legislation outlawing this gruesome act that many, including Justices of the Supreme Court, consider to be infanticide. </div>
<div>One of the most disturbing aspects of this case is the fact that the plaintiff, Planned Parenthood, has received in the last two years -- that they've reported -- over $500 million in taxpayer money. America needs to wake up to this disturbing fact! </div>
<div>On one hand, Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in America, is funded in large part by our hard-earned tax dollars. This money is allocated from Congress. Then Planned Parenthood turns around and sues Congress for passing a law banning partial-birth abortion. In essence, Congress is taking our money, giving it to Planned Parenthood, who then sues Congress with the aid of the money we've already given them. </div>
<div>Last year, Planned Parenthood showed revenue totaling nearly $810 million dollars. Of their $810 million in revenue, $265 million came from taxpayers in the form of government grants and contracts. In 2004 and 2005, Planned Parenthood received $551 million in governmental funding. </div>
<div>This is money coming out of our tax dollars. Planned Parenthood uses our tax dollars to promote, advertise and market the benefits of abortion, including partial-birth abortion. </div>
<div>Last year, Planned Parenthood performed almost 250,000 abortions, a number that has steadily increased since 1997. They also use tax dollars to fund explicit materials promoting abortion directed at teens. Over the past three years, Planned Parenthood has reportedly spent over $110 million of taxpayer money bringing lawsuits, challenging legislation and promoting their agenda. </div>
<div>What is outrageous in all of this is that Congress passed a law that bans partial-birth abortion, then your tax dollars provided Planned Parenthood the ability to sue Congress over the partial-birth abortion statute that they already passed. </div>
<div>None of us want our tax dollars spent on this. Now is the time to take a stand against this horrible misuse of public funds and against Planned Parenthood. </div>
<div>U.S. Senator David Vitter has proposed legislation that would stop the practice of taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood. Senate Bill 2206 states: &ldquo;None of the funds appropriated under this title shall be distributed to grantees who perform abortions or whose subgrantees perform abortions&hellip;&rdquo; </div>
<div>It is about time that Congress passed this legislation. Forced support for Planned Parenthood from taxpayers is a form of tyranny that we should not allow in the United States.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2594</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2594</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>ECUSA's Incoming Leader: Homosexuality Not a Choice, Jesus Not the Only Way<br />
Comments by Jefferts-Schori During Interview Appear to Contradict Scripture </h3>
<div>By Jody Brown and Allie Martin<br />
November 2, 2006</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - She says she doesn't consider Jesus Christ to be the only way to God. She says she believes God makes some people &quot;gay.&quot; And she's soon to be the leader of a mainline Protestant denomination in America.</div>
<div>In his letter to the Colossians, the Apostle Paul writes that &quot;in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form&quot; (Col. 2:9, NIV). But in an interview this week with <em>Associated Press</em>, Bishop Katharine Jefferts-Schori -- who is to be installed on Saturday as the first female presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church USA -- stated that Christians should not say that Jesus is the only way to God. &quot;If we insist we know the one way to God,&quot; she said, &quot;we've put God in a very small box.&quot;</div>
<div>In John 14:6, Jesus -- in responding to a question posed by the disciple Thomas -- said: &quot;I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me.&quot; But Jefferts-Schori says she disagrees with the idea that salvation comes only through trusting in Jesus Christ. &quot;It's this sense that one person can have the fullness of truth in him or herself, rather than understanding that truth is -- like God -- more than any one person can encompass,&quot; stated the soon-to-be ECUSA leader.</div>
<div>Jefferts-Schori says she views salvation as the healing of all Creation through holy living. &quot;I understand salvation as being about the healing of the whole creation. Your part and my part in that is about holy living,&quot; she offered. &quot;As Christians we understand [salvation] as relationship with God in Jesus, but that does not mean that we're expected to judge other people's own commitments.&quot; </div>
<div>Where does she stand on the issue of homosexuality? The Episcopal Church has been embroiled for years in a debate over the ordination of homosexual clergy and &quot;blessing&quot; ceremonies for same-sex couples. Jefferts-Schori supports both -- and in fact, she voted in 2003 to confirm her denomination's first openly homosexual bishop, V. Gene Robinson. She told <em>AP</em> that she does not believe the Bible condemns &quot;committed&quot; homosexual relationships. God, she says, made some people &quot;gay.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;Sexual orientation is pretty clearly defined at a very early age, before the age of reason. It's not a choice,&quot; she said. &quot;In that case, a person of faith would need to say that it's a piece of how one is created.&quot; Consequently, she says, the Church should offer what she calls &quot;a sacramental container&quot; to help homosexuals find &quot;holy ways of living in relationship.&quot;</div>
<div>Scriptures in the Bible about homosexual acts being sinful, she says, are misunderstood. &quot;They're not about what today we see as mature human beings entering into committed relationships with each other on a full and equal basis,&quot; says Jefferts-Schori, who believes such &quot;committed&quot; relationships can be blessed. &quot;The religious community's job, really, is to help all human beings find healthy and whole and holy ways of living in relationship.&quot;</div>
<strong>
<div>Run, Don't Walk</div>
<div>&quot;I think they need to run, not walk, to the exit and find an orthodox Episcopal church,&quot; suggests Anderson.</div>
<div>According to Anderson, the Episcopal Church cast off biblical beliefs long ago in favor of postmodernism. Jefferts-Schori's comments, he claims, is merely in harmony with that. &quot;Her remarks with regard to the plurality of ways to God are consistent both with what she has said before and with what the top level of leadership in the Episcopal Church has been saying now for probably a decade,&quot; says Anderson.</div>
<em>
<div>Associated Press</div>
<div>Dallas Bishop James Stanton said in a statement earlier this week that he still disagrees with the direction of the Episcopal Church, but that the language in the request from the other dioceses rejecting incoming Jefferts-Schori and seeking an alternate leader had &quot;caused confusion and some anxiety&quot; in his diocese.</div>
<div><em>Associated Press</em> contributed to this story. </div>
<div align="right">&copy; 2006 AgapePress all rights reserved.</div>
</em>reports that eight Episcopal dioceses have asked Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, who heads the world Anglican Communion, to put them under a leader other than Bishop Jefferts-Schori. But the Episcopal Diocese of Dallas says it is not one of those dioceses asking Williams to appoint a conservative national leader to oversee them.</strong><br />
Canon David Anderson is president of the American Anglican Council, a group of conservative clergy and lay people from the Episcopal Church. Anderson says he's not surprised at the recent comments by Jefferts-Schori, and offers what he sees as the only option for those still in churches aligned with ECUSA.]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2593</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2593</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Thomas More Law Center Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Overturn Ninth Circuit Decision Eliminating Parents' Fundamental Rights</h3>
<p><br />
Thu, Nov 2, 2006<br />
<br />
<span>ANN ARBOR, MI&mdash;The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, has submitted a friend of the court brief to the United States Supreme Court on behalf of itself and six United States Congressmen urging the Court to overturn the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals&rsquo; decision in Fields v. Palmdale School District, which held that public schools may impart any sexually based information to elementary school children as the schools sees fit, even if parents would object on religious or moral grounds. </span><br />
</p>
<div>In the case, children between seven and ten years of age in the Palmdale school district, without their parents&rsquo; informed consent, were administered a sexually explicit survey asking whether they agreed with statements such as &ldquo;Can&rsquo;t stop thinking about sex,&rdquo; &ldquo;Touching my private parts too much,&rdquo; &ldquo;Touching other people&rsquo;s private parts,&rdquo; and &ldquo;Not trusting people because they might want to have sex.&rdquo; The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the parents who challenged the school district&rsquo;s practice.
<div>Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented, &ldquo;The far-left liberal agenda is to use our public education system to drive a wedge between parents and their children on moral, social, and religious issues. This case is an example of how court opinions by activist judges are supporting that agenda. The Supreme Court needs to reaffirm that the fundamental rights of parents to direct the upbringing of their children extends even while their children are attending public schools.&rdquo;
<div>Joining the brief are Representatives Tim Murphy (R-PA), Rob Bishop (R-UT), Tom Feeney (R-FL), Louis Gohmert (R-TX), Patrick McHenry (R-NC), and Paul Ryan (R-WI). Representative Murphy authored and sponsored House Resolution 547, which expressed the sense of the House of Representatives that the Ninth Circuit deplorably infringed on parental rights in the Fields case. Representatives Bishop, Feeney, Gohmert, McHenry, and Ryan were co-sponsors of the Resolution, which the House of Representatives overwhelmingly adopted.
<div>The Law Center is concerned about the disturbingly strong language used in the Ninth Circuit&rsquo;s opinion:
<div>&middot; Parents have no constitutional right &ldquo;to prevent a public school from providing its students with whatever information it wishes to provide, sexual or otherwise, when and as the school determines that it is appropriate to do so.&rdquo;
<div>. The only choice parents have is whether or not to enroll their children in public school.
<div>&middot; Once in school, the parents have no authority over what their children are taught.
<div>&middot; The school can teach the children anything it wants ... short of committing treason.
<div>According to Edward L. White III, trial counsel with the Law Center, &ldquo;A key issue in this case is whether parents&rsquo; constitutional rights over the upbringing of their children still apply while the children attend public school. Public schools should not be places where schools do as they please with children.&rdquo;
<div>The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life through education, litigation, and related activities. It does not charge for its services. The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization. You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at www.thomasmore.org. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2592</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2592</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Ohio School District Accused of Discriminating Against Religious -- Except Muslims<br />
</h3>
<div>By Jim Brown<br />
November 2, 2006</div>
<div>(AgapePress) - A school district in the Cincinnati, Ohio, area is being accused of discriminating against Christian students while giving special treatment to Muslims and homosexuals. Some residents of the city of Mason are outraged that Kevin Bright, district superintendent for Mason City School District, recently provided a prayer and fasting room for two Muslim students during Ramadan.</div>
<div>Complaining Mason residents have observed that no special room was set up for Christians or students of other religious persuasions for prayer during lunch. They also note that Easter break is now called &quot;spring break,&quot; and certain kinds of Christmas displays are banned from the city schools' campuses.</div>
<div>Mason School Board member Jennifer Miller says the school district's diversity panel is working to appease both Muslims and homosexuals in the school district lately. However, she notes, &quot;Christianity was not represented on that panel. They do not tolerate any type of religious or Christian activity.&quot;</div>
<div>In fact, Miller observes, far from simply avoiding any promotion of Christian faith expression or Christian activity, the panel and other school officials &quot;discourage that from happening on our campuses.&quot; She says there seems to be a concerted effort afoot in the district to expand tolerance for everything except Christian values.</div>
<div>Sharon Poe, a member of the group Citizens for Accountability and Responsibility in Education (CARE), believes students of other faiths who attend the school in Mason should be given access to the room that was provided for the Muslim students' use. For instance, she says she would like to see Christian students allowed to use the space for celebrating Christmas.</div>
<div>&quot;They can maybe bring in their Nativity scenes, and their crosses and their Bibles and hold a Christmas party -- not a holiday party,&quot; Poe suggests. &quot;I'd also [encourage school officials] to allow the Jewish community to use the room, if they so desire, for their high holy days and light their menorah,&quot; she says.</div>
<div>Nativity scenes are banned under current Mason City School District policy, Poe notes. Also, she says the district schools avoid use of the religious term, Easter, in association with that seasonal religious holiday.</div>
<div>Jim Brown, a regular contributor to <em>AgapePress</em>, is a reporter for American Family Radio News, which can be heard online. </div>
<div align="right">&copy; 2006 AgapePress all rights reserved.</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2591</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2591</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Evangelical Leader: Young Protestant Couples Rejecting &ldquo;Contraception Revolution&rdquo;<br />
<br />
</h3>
<div>By Gudrun Schultz</div>
<div>LOUISVILLE, Kentucky, November 3, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Young Christian couples are re-thinking contraceptive use and biblical teaching on human sexuality, in response to a growing awareness of the social damage caused by the sexual revolution, a foremost leader in the U.S evangelical community told Christianity Today last month.</div>
<div>Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr., is a theologian and ordained minister, serving as president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, the leading educational institution of the Southern Baptist Convention. He said Christian evangelicals are questioning the effects widespread reliance on birth control has had on society.</div>
<div>&ldquo;In the first place, this generation has now come to adulthood at a time when we can take some stock of the impact represented by the sexual revolution and by the easy access to effective contraception and birth control,&rdquo; Dr. Mohler said. </div>
<div>&ldquo;And the burden now seems to be, &lsquo;What did all of this mean? What was the affect of the birth control revolution? What kind of changes in human institutions and relationships came as a result of the Pill? What about the missing generation among us of children who would otherwise be present were it not for the easy availability of effective birth control?&rsquo;&rdquo;</div>
<div>The previous generation&rsquo;s acceptance of a secular understanding of sexuality and marriage is no longer satisfactory to young people, Dr. Mohler said, who are challenging the separation between fertility and sexuality in the popular mindset.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The second issue is, in this postmodern time, a recovery, among the young, of a biblical ideal of marriage. They are doing their very best to rethink the basic questions and, in doing so, they are embarrassed by the easy, rather unreflective embrace of the contraception culture that marked evangelicalism in the 1960s and 70s. So they want to rethink all this.</div>
<div>&ldquo;The third thing is, I think, a deep embrace of a biblical notion of sexuality, post-the sexual revolution, has led many younger evangelicals to think seriously about this question, and all this adds up to giant question mark in the minds of many young Christians. Can we join the contraceptive revolution? And, if not, how do we think about these things in a way that will strengthen our marriages and be most pleasing to God.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Dr. Mohler said survey indications showing almost half of pro-life Americans support easy access to the abortifacient morning-after pill reveals the lack of consistent thinking among evangelicals on the issue. </div>
<div>&ldquo;What we face are many evangelicals whose understanding of these things is rather superficial at best and largely influenced by the culture. And so they know how to answer the question about the sanctity of human life correctly, in the main, but they do not know how to apply that to the question of birth control.&rdquo;</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2590</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2590</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Pro-Abortion Group Files Lawsuit Over Pregnancy Centers, Federal Funds </h3>
<div><strong>by Steven Ertelt</strong><br />
<em>LifeNews.com Editor<br />
November 2</em><em>, 2006</em><br />
</div>
<div><strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>A pro-abortion group calling itself a watchdog organization has filed a lawsuit seeking information on federal funding of pregnancy centers across the country. The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) claims that the government is funding centers that are providing misleading information to women.
<div>CREW is one of several pro-abortion groups that have tried to tarnish the reputation of the thousands of pregnancy centers across the nation by claiming they are giving women false information about abortion's risks.</div>
<div>Previously, CREW asked the Department of Health and Human Services and the White House about the federal governments policies on funding such centers. When HHS failed to respond to an August Freedom of Information Act request for documents, CREW filed suit.</div>
<div>CREW's lawsuit was filed last week with the Washington, DC federal district court, according to a NewStandard report.</div>
<div>The group wants documents on the criteria for funding, information on efforts by the centers to separate practical help for women with unplanned pregnancies and religious outreach efforts, and communications from the HHS about the accuracy of the information the pregnancy centers provide.</div>
<div>CREW's complaint relies on a biased report abortion advocates in Congress released in July claiming pregnancy centers give women false information. The report provided little concrete evidence and relied mostly on pro-abortion denials of extensive research linking abortion to breast cancer, depression and other mental health risks.</div>
<div>The report blasted the Bush Administration for giving pregnancy centers $30 million in federal grants since 2001 and other earmarks have provided more funds.</div>
<div>However, the pregnancy centers are relying on studies that have shown the numerous risks associated with abortion.</div>
<div>A January study by Dr. David Fergusson, a New Zealand researcher who backs abortion, found 42 percent of women who had abortions had experienced major depression within the last four years. That's almost double the rate of women who never became pregnant.</div>
<div>According to the study, women who have abortions were twice as likely to drink alcohol at dangerous levels and three times as likely to be addicted to illegal drugs. The risk of anxiety disorders also doubled.</div>
<div>His research follows a survey by professors at Bowling Green State University in 2004 who examined data on nearly 11,000 women between the ages of 15 and 34 who had experienced an unintended pregnancy. </div>
<div>Their survey found that women who have abortions of unexpected pregnancies were 30 percent more likely to experience subsequent problems with anxiety than those who don't have one.</div>
<div>Women in the study who had abortions and suffered from general anxiety disorder experienced irritability, fatigue, difficulty sleeping, a pounding or racing heart, or feelings of unreality.</div>
<div>This research has prompted the American Psychological Association to withdraw an official statement denying a link between abortion and psychological harm.</div>
<div>It also prompted a leading group of British psychologists and doctors to release a joint statement saying, &quot;Since women having abortions can no longer be said to have a low risk of suffering from psychiatric conditions such as depression, doctors have a duty to advise about long-term adverse psychological consequences of abortion.&quot;</div>
<div>Their warning came in the form of a group letter written in the London Times newspaper.</div>
<div>This isn't the first time CREW has promoted abortion in its lawsuits.</div>
<div>Last November, the group claimed pro-life organization Focus on the Family was violating its nonprofit tax status by allowing Dr. James Dobson, its founder and president, to advocate the election of political candidates. </div>
<div>CREW sent a letter to the IRS asking it to investigate and consider revoking FOF's nonprofit tax status. </div>
<div>Dobson has said many times before that he only makes endorsements as an individual and not in his capacity as the head of Focus no the Family. But CREW accuses Dobson of using the organization's resources to advance those endorsements.</div>
<div>Jim Bopp, a pro-life attorney who is a national expert on campaign finance laws, dismissed the CREW complaint.</div>
<div>&quot;Anyone can send a letter to the IRS,&quot; he told Capitol Hill Blue. &quot;Anyone can send out a press release about the letter. And that means nothing to the IRS.&quot;<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2589</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2589</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Baby Girl born alive and killed after surviving late-term abortion<br />
2nd degree murder charges may be laid<br />
<br />
</h3>
<div>By Hilary White </div>
<div>HIALEA, November 2, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) &ndash; Two Co-owners of a Miami-area abortion facility called Ginecologia may be charged with second-degree murder for killing a baby girl born alive in a recovery room. Co-owners Belkis Gonzalez and Siomara Senises are being investigated after Miami-Dade County police found the badly decomposed body of a baby girl at the facility. A search warrant reported that there was &ldquo;probable cause&rdquo; to pursue a second degree murder investigation.</div>
<div>A woman identified by Operation Rescue in their October 23 report as Ms. Betty Rojas informed police that a child had been killed by &ldquo;a doctor&rdquo; by drowning after being born alive. </div>
<div>18-year old Sycloria Williams, told police that she had arrived at the facility July 20 for the second half of a late-term abortion. She says she gave birth to a living baby girl while sitting in a recliner in the facility&rsquo;s recovery room. Ms. Williams told police that she had watched her daughter moving and gasping for air for approximately five minutes.</div>
<div>The warrant says that the staff &ldquo;began screaming that the baby was alive.&rdquo; Then, &ldquo;Ms. Belkis Gonzalez cut the umbilical cord, threw it into a red bag with black printing. Ms. Gonzalez then swept the baby, with her hands, into the same red bag along with the gauze used during the procedure.&rdquo; </div>
<div>Eight days later, police found the body of the child which Rojas had informed them had been treated with a caustic chemical and left in the heat of the Florida sun to accelerate decomposition in a possible attempt to dispose of the evidence.</div>
<div>Proceedings are awaiting the results of an autopsy that, due to the severe decomposition of the body, might still be inconclusive. Police are interested in evidence that the baby was born alive and that she was possibly over 24 weeks gestation, the legal limit for abortion in Florida.</div>
<div>Since the October 23 report, the Miami New Times published a story revealing the substandard conditions of the for-profit abortion facilities owned or operated by Senises and Gonzalez. Hialeah Police Deputy Chief Mark Overton told the New Times that an unnamed witness confirmed that &ldquo;the baby was born alive; it was attempting to breathe.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Overton said, &ldquo;This isn't about a botched abortion; there never was an abortion, and the mother is not the victim&hellip;The victim is the baby, and whether that baby had an hour or eight hours' worth of life, she had a right to that.&rdquo;</div>
<div>&ldquo;Palmetto General Hospital is only five minutes away,&rdquo; he said, indicating that the child&rsquo;s life could have been saved. &ldquo;It is our opinion that this is a homicide, an unlawful killing of a human being.&rdquo;</div>
<div>Overton told the New Times that the baby&rsquo;s remains had weighed between two and three pounds and measured about 12 inches long. The average gestation of a twelve-inch foetus is between 24 and 25 weeks. The average for a baby weighing two pounds is 27 weeks.<br />
Another of facility owned or operated by Senises and Gonzalez was closed by police in 2004 after the abortion of twins was botched and it was revealed that one doctor hired to do abortions there had no medical license. A third facility is still in operation. </div>
<div>On October 29, Overton told WorldNetDaily that he believes charges of second-degree murder will be filed in the case.</div>
<div>Read Operation Rescue report:<br />
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=482"><font color="#003399">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=482</font></a></div>
<div>Read the police search warrant (Adobe reader required):<br />
<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.operationrescue.org/pdfs/hialeahsearch.PDF"><font color="#003399">http://www.operationrescue.org/pdfs/hialeahsearch.PDF</font></a></div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2588</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2588</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h4>A Liberal Congress Could Spell Disaster for Conservative Judicial Nominees</h4>
<div class="author">by Pete Winn, associate editor</div>
<div>
<div><em>What's at stake in the upcoming election? Plenty, if you want to see judges on the bench who respect the Constitution.</em>
<div class="text">
<div>Conservative pundits and pro-family legal analysts say if liberals gain control of Congress on Tuesday, the fate of future conservative judicial nominees will hang in the balance.</div>
<div>With them, according to Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst of Focus on the Family Action, will hang the fates of pre-born babies, marriage and religious liberty.</div>
<div>&quot;The success of the president's judicial appointments depends on conservative control of the Senate,&quot; he said. &quot;If conservatives do not retain control, then ultraliberals like (Sens.) Patrick Leahy, (D-Vt.), Ted Kennedy, (D-Mass.), and Chuck Schumer, (D-N.Y.) will decide the type of judges the president can get confirmed.&quot;</div>
<div>Gary Bauer, president of American Values, is equally concerned. He said we are just one Supreme Court appointment away from the possible reversal of decisions on abortion and religious freedom. </div>
<div>&quot;Right now, by most estimates, we are still down on the Supreme Court, 5-4,&quot; Bauer said on a recent Focus on the Family broadcast.</div>
<div>&quot;The president did get two strong conservatives on the Court, but one of them replaced a strong conservative. So we're one vote short. And there are a couple of liberals on the court -- John Paul Stevens, 86 years old; and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is 73, but who has been battling a number of illnesses, including cancer -- that rumor says are considering stepping down.&quot; </div>
<div>Bauer said if either justice steps down and the U.S. Senate is controlled by liberal Democrats, &quot;We will lose the last chance in this generation to stop abortion on demand and to preserve marriage as one man and one woman.&quot;</div>
<div>Hausknecht, meanwhile, warns that if liberals should wrest control of the Senate Judiciary Committee from conservatives, no strict-constructionist nominee will ever win confirmation. </div>
<div>&quot;Right now there are 50 vacancies on the federal courts that President Bush must fill,&quot; Hausknecht said. &quot;This election will determine whether they can be filled by men and women who interpret the Constitution according to its original meaning, or whether they must meet the liberals' definition of a mainstream judge -- that is they must swear allegiance to abortion, rewrite the Constitution whenever they feel some 'right' is missing, and prohibit any reference to God in the public square. If that's not troubling enough to get pro-family conservatives to the polls, then nothing is.&quot;</div>
<div>Dr. James Dobson, chairman of Focus on the Family Action, along with his wife, National Day of Prayer Task Force Chairman Shirley Dobson, asked Christians to take time to pray for the election -- then to vote on Election Day.</div>
<div>&quot;To all of those values voters out there: Don't you dare sit this one out!&quot; Dobson told his listeners. &quot;You have an obligation to come and participate in this great representative form of government. </div>
<div>&quot;Why would you not take 15 to 20 to 30 minutes to fulfill that responsibility? And if we do, I think the results will take care of themselves.&quot; </div>
<div><strong>TAKE ACTION / FOR MORE INFORMATION:</strong><br />
For a full discussion of what's at stake on Nov. 7, listen to the Oct. 31 <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.family.org/fmedia/broadcast/">Focus on the Family broadcast</a> with Dr. James Dobson and his guests Gary Bauer and Tom Minnery, senior vice president of government and public policy for Focus on the Family Action.</div>
<div>Additionally, CitizenLink has launched an <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/election/">Election Web site</a> to help you track the fate of issues and candidates. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2586</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2586</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>    </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h5>James Dobson Warns of Election Fallout if Pro-Life Voters Stay Home by Steven Ertelt<br />
LifeNews.com Editor<br />
November 1, 2006<br />
<strong>Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- </strong>Pro-life leader James Dobson, the founder of Focus on the Family, warns of the fallout that would occur if pro-life voters stay home on election day. He urged pro-life voters to go to the polls because key issues like abortion and embryonic stem cell research funding are at stake. </h5>
<div>
<div>On his radio broadcast that reaches more than 1.5 million people on hundreds of radio stations, Dobson warned of what would happen if abortion advocates take over control of Congress and key committees.</div>
<div>Pro-life advocates are concerned that the election will result in enough votes to overturn President Bush's veto of a bill to force taxpayers to pay for embryonic stem cell research.</div>
<div>The elections could result not only in the prevention of pro-life legislation but could have pro-abortion lawmakers leading one-sided hearings into crisis pregnancy centers, abstinence education programs, and the effects of the dangerous abortion drug RU 486.</div>
<div>&quot;To all of those values voters out there, don't you dare sit this one out,&quot; Dobson said, according to a Denver Post. &quot;You have an obligation to come and participate in this great representative form of government. ... If we do, I think the results will take care of themselves.&quot; </div>
<div>With polls show abortion advocates leading in numerous contests, turning out pro-life voters is a key to minimizing the damage.</div>
<div>Gary Bauer, a former Republican presidential candidate and Focus on the Family vice president Tom Minnery joined Dobson on his program.</div>
<div>They also pointed to problems for pro-life judicial picks should Democrats run the Senate, which could complicate efforts to overturn Roe v. Wade.</div>
<div>&quot;If values voters in those states decide to sit this one out, we could very easily lose it,&quot; Dobson said, referring to states with key Senate battles.<br />
<br />
Earlier this month, one of the nation's top abortion advocacy groups released a wish list of legislative and policy results it hopes to achieve if abortion advocates wind up with control of Congress following the November elections. <br />
<br />
While pro-life candidates are running for Congress in both political parties, NARAL is hoping Democrats gain control of both the House and Senate, because the current members of Democratic leadership back legalized abortion.</div>
<div>Should that happen, the group says it will have a field day promoting abortion.<br />
<br />
&quot;With a House or Senate under pro-choice leadership, we will turn pro-choice values into pro-choice policies,&quot; the group warned.</div>
<div>With abortion advocates running the show, NARAL says it would &quot;control the powerful Judiciary committee and stop George Bush from placing new anti-choice judges on the Supreme Court and other federal courts.&quot;</div>
<div>Moreover, NARAL celebrates that pro-abortion lawmakers &quot;would control key committees&quot; and &quot;instantly become a majority on every panel.&quot;</div>
<div>&quot;Rather than sitting through anti-choice hearing after hearing, called by anti-choice committee chairs, new committee chairs could spend their time promoting&quot; abortion, NARAL wrote.<br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2585</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2585</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>         </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<h3>Fed-up Wal-Mart worker quits over pro-'gay' agenda<br />
Urges Christians to take stand because most people 'unaware'<br />
</h3>
<p><font size="+0">By Bob Unruh<br />
<font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font></font></p>
<p>Sam Walton's original stores wouldn't even sell recorded music if it contained profanity and Janet Baird was happy working hard to make the company money, setting up and managing wedding fairs and other promotions, and won awards for her efforts. </p>
<p>She and her husband even married at one of the store's events. </p>
<p>But no more. The Ohio woman, after hearing the shocking confirmation directly from the mega-corporation's international headquarters that the company is, in fact, contributing to the financial and moral agenda of the nation's &quot;gay&quot; chamber of commerce, she quit. And she's not a bit worried. </p>
<p>&quot;I got God backing me. That's where I stand on it,&quot; she told WND in an interview. </p>
<p>Baird had worked for the corporation, in various branches including Sam's Club and Wal-Mart, since 1992. It was a recent tip she received from her brother that was the beginning of the end, because he told her &quot;my company had joined the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce.&quot; </p>
<p>It was during an <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51774">interview with WND in August</a> that <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.walmart.com/catalog/catalog.gsp?cat=121268">Wal-Mart spokesman Bob McAdam</a> said, &quot;It is correct that we have a dialogue with the (gay chamber). This is just what businesses do.&quot; </p>
<p>&quot;Sam Walton was such a moral man, he wouldn't even allow music to be sold in his stores if it had bad language,&quot; Baird said. &quot;When it comes to moral values, first of all they started selling smutty magazines, then they brought in nasty music and videos, even ones others refused to sell, like 'Brokeback Mountain.'&quot; </p>
<p>Now this comes along. &quot;I sent an e-mail (to the company) asking, 'What have you done to Sam Walton's store?&quot; Baird said. </p>
<p>McAdam had told WND the move was just another business outreach, much as the company's affiliations with other chambers of commerce, such as the Hispanic organization. </p>
<p>But to Baird, it wasn't the same. She called the corporate office for its response. &quot;The lady said, 'Yes.' When I asked if the money I spent shopping at Wal-Mart would go to support same-sex marriage, she simply responded, 'Sales are sales.'&quot; </p>
<p>&quot;I let her know how long I had worked at Wal-Mart and told her that I would no longer work for this company and never spend another dime there. She replied, 'I hope you don't mean that.' I did mean it. The next day I went to the store and quit. The manager that signed my exit papers had no idea about what had been going on in the leadership of Wal-Mart.&quot; </p>
<p>Now she's staging protests in front of that store, and others nearby, to let people know of the company's affiliations and commitments. </p>
<p>She said a large part of her years-long commitment to the company was because of the original core values the company exemplified. </p>
<p>&quot;I began working with Sam's Club in 1992. Mr. Sam Walton, the founder of Wal-Mart Stores, had recently passed away. The more I learned about this man the more I wanted to do what I could to make this an ever better place to work. </p>
<p>&quot;I worked in marketing and put together the first wedding expo. This was a fund-raiser that allowed vendors to set up for a weekend and all the proceeds went to the Children's Miracle Network. It was a huge success,&quot; she said. </p>
<p>&quot;This became a yearly event. I was so proud to work for this company. I was privileged to be the event coordinator for a number of Wal-Mart sponsored events and raised a lot of money in the community,&quot; she said. </p>
<p>One beneficiary was a young man named Luke Clemons. He was 18 and needed a liver transplant. &quot;We managed to raise enough money for (the) transplant and start a Luke Clemons Foundation,&quot; Baird said. He survived four more years. </p>
<p>For that work, she was given a Member Service Award. </p>
<p>&quot;This was not a job to me, it was a ministry given to me by God Himself to help His people in need and get paid for it at the same time,&quot; Baird said. </p>
<p>But things changed. &quot;Today Wal-Mart is not the same company Mr. Sam started. I think he would rather see it go under than to see what it has become. Mr. Sam loved God &ndash; the store he began does not!&quot; she said. </p>
<p>Her boycott is getting its start in front of the store where she used to work, on the Lexington Springmill Road in Ontario, and then at the nearby store in Mansfield, Ohio, and then will continue to other stores. </p>
<p>&quot;As Christians we have to take a stand and get the word out because most people are not aware of what is happening,&quot; she said. </p>
<p>Her big boycott launch will be the Friday after Thanksgiving, November 24, she said, because that traditionally is the biggest single shopping day of the year. </p>
<p>&quot;We will be joining all of you on the day after Thanksgiving &hellip; to bring the Gospel of Christ to the very gates of hell,&quot; she said. </p>
<p>She's replaced only part of the income she gave up by leaving Wal-Mart, by accepting a position in a physician's office. </p>
<p>When Wal-Mart initially confirmed the agreement to support the &quot;gay&quot; chamber, Tony Perkins, of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frc.org/">Family Research Council</a> in Washington, D.C., immediately launched a citizens protest of the move. </p>
<p>It also was at that point that an advertising industry site, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.adage.com/">AdAge,</a> confirmed Wal-Mart not only had joined the NGLCC but also has hired a &quot;gay-marketing&quot; shop and started discussions about extending domestic-partner benefits to employees. </p>
<p>In the AdAge report, Justin Nelson of the NGLCC described the company as &quot;pragmatic.&quot; </p>
<p>&quot;They have been viewed with some degree of skepticism by the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community, and it's important for them in terms of gaining market share to change that,&quot; he told AdAge. </p>
<p>Perkins told supporters that the &quot;heat&quot; from the &quot;radical left&quot; apparently influenced the company's corporate decisions, and he wants constituents to let Wal-Mart know of their displeasure. </p>
<p>&quot;While the NGLCC professes to promote the 'interests of the LGBT business community,' this is not all they have done,&quot; Perkins said. &quot;Recently, they described efforts to defend traditional marriage as an attempt to 'write discrimination into the Constitution &hellip;' The NGLCC also advocated attaching a pro-homosexual 'hate crimes' amendment to legislation intended to protect children from violent sex offenders.&quot; </p>
<p>&quot;It is unfortunate,&quot; Perkins said, &quot;that Wal-Mart has joined forces with an organization whose mission opposes many of the values shared by rural and small-town America. It is precisely the interests of average Americans that Wal-Mart has prided itself in promoting. </p>
<p>&quot;Now, by surrendering to the radical homosexual lobby, Wal-Mart has entered the political arena with no economic benefit to their company or their customers,&quot; he said. </p>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2521</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2521</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>      </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="NewsTitle" id="ContentViewer1_spnTitle" style="DISPLAY: inline">
<h3>ADF sues university on behalf of Christian student punished for opposing homosexual adoption </h3>
<em>Missouri State University student majoring in social work was forced to testify before &ldquo;ethics&rdquo; committee to defend her beliefs</em><br />
</div>
<div>
<div id="ContentViewer1_divPoll" style="DISPLAY: none"></div>
<div id="ContentViewer1_spnContent">KANSAS CITY, Mo. &mdash; Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund filed a complaint today in federal district court to defend the First Amendment rights of a Missouri State University student punished by school officials for her religious beliefs regarding homosexual adoption. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;The university is supposed to be the marketplace of ideas, and professors should be tolerant of the opinions of Christian students as well as those of non-Christian students,&rdquo; said ADF Senior Legal Counsel David French, director of ADF&rsquo;s Center for Academic Freedom. &ldquo;But at Missouri State University, officials have singled out a student for punishment simply because she refused to write and sign a letter to the state legislature supporting homosexual adoption.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
MSU student Emily Brooker faced an &ldquo;ethics&rdquo; committee after school officials informed her that she stood accused of a Level 3 grievance for violation of the School of Social Work&rsquo;s &ldquo;Standards of Essential Functioning in Social Work Education.&rdquo; The Level 3 grievance is the highest level of grievance that an individual can bring against a student. University officials told Brooker she had violated three of the &ldquo;Standards of Essential Functioning&rdquo;: Diversity, Interpersonal Skills, and Professional Behavior. <br />
<br />
One of Brooker&rsquo;s MSU professors, Frank G. Kauffman, assigned to his students a project promoting homosexual foster homes and adoption. The project required the entire class to write and individually sign a letter to the Missouri Legislature in support of homosexual adoption, a letter Brooker refused to sign due to her religious objections. <br />
<br />
On Dec. 16, 2005, Brooker faced a two-and-a-half hour interrogation by faculty members, who allegedly asked her personally invasive questions such as, &ldquo;Do you think gays and lesbians are sinners?&rdquo; and &ldquo;Do you think I am a sinner?&rdquo; <br />
<br />
&ldquo;In an institution of higher learning, students should be marked on the quality of their work, not discriminated against on the basis of their religious beliefs,&rdquo; said French. &ldquo;At MSU, a Christian student was interrogated by faculty members who attacked her religious beliefs and threatened to withhold her degree. This is a clear violation of her First Amendment rights.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
A copy of the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Southern Division, in the case <em>Brooker v. The Governors of Missouri State University</em> can be read at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/BrookerComplaint.pdf">www.telladf.org/UserDocs/BrookerComplaint.pdf</a>. <br />
<br />
ADF&rsquo;s Center for Academic Freedom is defending religious freedom at America&rsquo;s public universities. ADF is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. <br />
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2518</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2518</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>     </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<font size="5">Woman's death at hands of 'gay' her fault, says lawyer<br />
</font><font color="#000000" size="+1">Trial begins over death of Christian who questioned homosexual lifestyle choice</font><br />
<div><font size="-1">&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font>
<div>
<div>
<div>Mary Stachowicz was attacked with such ferocity the assailant's hunting knife blade was bent, but a defense attorney for her alleged attacker is painting her with the blame, saying it wasn't a &quot;hate crime&quot; and it happened because her comments about his &quot;gay&quot; lifestyle assaulted the man.
<div>And since it was only a routine murder case, not a &quot;hate crime,&quot; the story is getting almost no coverage from mainstream media outlets, several conservative groups have noted.
<div>The murder trial for Nicholas Gutierrez, 23, in Stachowicz' 2002 death has begun in Chicago, where prosecutor Jim McKay described the viciousness of the attack on the 51-year-old mother of four and faithful Catholic Church member.
<div>She was stabbed, strangled, raped and beaten, and then her body was stuffed in a crawl space under the floor of an apartment, he reported.
<div>But the suspect's attorney, Crystal Marchigiani, alleged in her opening remarks that it was Stachowicz who attacked Gutierrez, and her verbal assault was what sparked his response.
<div>&quot;It happened because she could not leave him alone in his (homosexual) lifestyle,&quot; she said, describing the apparent confrontation between the two at the Sikorsky Funeral Home where Stochowicz worked and where Gutierrez lived in an apartment with his partner, Ray.
<div>&quot;The Gutierrez defense team's Politically Correct courtroom ploy ought to be called the 'Anti-homophobe Panic Defense,'&quot; said Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth, a pro-family organization. &quot;Marchigiani's is an ugly attempt to exploit the liberal caricature of Christians who oppose homosexuality as crazed haters with a penchant for aggression.&quot;
<div>&quot;So here we see a new defense tactic: stoking the flames of anti-Christian bigotry to save a 'gay' murderer from the punishment he deserves,&quot; he said.
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cultureandfamily.org/articledisplay.asp?id=2877&amp;department=CFI&amp;categoryid=cfreport">According to a report</a> from the Culture and Family Institute, weblog postings after the murder were full of anti-Christian hate statements.
<div>&quot;I really don't feel sorry for her. She paid a very steep price for being an arrogant religious fascist. Too bad for her,&quot; said &quot;Iris&quot; in a posting on the ACLU Online Forum.
<div>&quot;Maybe this will give pause to other people who similarly try to 'help' homosexuals,&quot; said &quot;Silence Dogood&quot; on the same forum.
<div>&quot;The mainstream media and homosexual advocacy organizations have reacted to Mary Stachowicz's murder the same way they did to 13-year-old Jesse Dirkhising's torture-murder at the hands of two homosexual men in 1999: by avoiding it,&quot; said Allyson Smith of the CFI.
<div>She noted that there was no condemnation of the murder from Human Rights Campaign, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, or the Gay and Lesbian Alliance or the Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.
<div>One pro-homosexual group, Soulforce, which works in churches to oppose traditional Christian views of the sexual lifestyle, did make a statement to a newspaper, even though it did not release a press statement.
<div>&quot;We condemn this murder, like we do all murders,&quot; said Laura Montgomery Rutt, but &quot;a hate crime needs to have an intent to intimidate a whole class of people.&quot;
<div>Chicago police reported that on Nov. 13, 2002, an argument broke out between the two and when Stachowicz asked why Gutierrez had sex with &quot;boys instead of girls,&quot; he erupted in rage, punching, kicking, stabbing and strangling her.
<div>He later led police to the body and confessed.
<div>National Review Online writer Rod Dreher has lamented that the media buzz about the case has been deafening by its silence.
<div>According to Dreher, &quot;One cannot help wondering if the upright citizens who report the news don't privately share the view of 'gay' blogger James Wagner, who said of Stachowicz&rsquo;s strangling: 'The woman who did such great evil is dead, but unfortunately the evil and the church and the society which creates it is not, and it will continue to destroy Nicholas Gutierrez and many others. I shake, safely sitting here at home, fully understanding, and fully familiar with, the horrible impact her words must have had for a man already so terribly damaged by his society, and his own mother.'
<div>&quot;I believe many, and probably most, journalists share the unspoken assumption that Christians bring such trouble on themselves,&quot; wrote Dreher.
<div>The Culture and Family Institute also quoted the victim's friend, May Coleman, who said, &quot;Those of us who knew her (could) hear her soft voice saying something like, 'God wouldn't approve of the way you're living your life.&rsquo; That's how Mary did things.&quot;
<div>Regional media outlets reported on the attack, but notably left out words such as &quot;gay&quot; or &quot;homosexual,&quot; the institute said.
<div>Catholic League President William Donohue said <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=47333">the murder is not listed as a hate crime, and won't be,</a> even though she &quot;was murdered for having a Catholic-informed conscience.&quot;
<div>&quot;Mary Stachowicz will never be remembered the way Matthew Shepard is, thus showing how politically corrupt the whole concept of hate crime legislation really is.&quot;
<div>LaBarbera said the woman &quot;is a modern day martyr who died because she told the truth to a man caught up in homosexuality. Her compelling story is largely unknown to Americans, because the same media that devoted millions of print column inches and broadcast minutes to covering the Matthew Shepard murder case have largely ignored Mary's story.&quot;
<div>&quot;The reality today is that growing secularist intolerance threatens to redefine Judeo-Christian beliefs as 'prejudice, intolerance,' or worse, 'hatred.'&quot;
<div>Dreher wrote that the similarities in the cases couldn't be ignored.
<div>&quot;Where have we heard this sort of thing before? Why, when three redneck men killed Matthew Shepard a few years ago, after the homosexual young man propositioned them in a bar. Understandably, the men found Shepard's words offensive,&quot; Dreher said.
<div>He said there is no moral difference between Stachowicz' attack and the one on Shepard.
<div>&quot;Both were heinous, and both deserve publicity, but the Stachowicz case, like the case of Jesse Dirkhising earlier, is being largely ignored,&quot; Dreher wrote. Dirkhising was a 13-year-old Arkansas boy raped, tortured and strangled by a gang of &quot;homosexuals&quot; in 1999.
<div>One researcher reported that in the month after Shepard's murder, Nexis recorded 3,007 stories were available about the death. However, &quot;in the one month after Dirkhising's case, there were 46 stories.&quot;
<div>&quot;In Canada,&quot; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/dreher/dreher112602.asp">Dreher noted,</a> &quot;Christians are having their freedom of speech and worship taken away by hate-speech laws designed to protect homosexuals from having their feelings hurt.&quot; </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
		<link>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2519</link>
<guid>http://blaisebaptist.com/templates/default.asp?id=36001&amp;PG=xCast&amp;LID=996&amp;CID=2519</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Last Week</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><font color="#3366ff" size="1">Quick Links<br />
</font><font size="2"><a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#in">Indiana Mom Blasts ACLU Attack on Release-Time Religious Training Program</a><br />
</font><font size="2"><a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#dance">City penalized for barring 'Jesus dancers'</a></font><font size="2"><br />
<a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#dad">School Shootings Signal Need for Dads' Involvment<br />
</a></font><font size="2"><a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#week">Anti-Pornography Week Starts Sunday <br />
</a></font><font size="2"><a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#design">Defending God's Design for the Family</a></font><font size="2"><br />
<a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#6th">6th Circuit Considers Two Religious-Liberties Cases</a> <br />
</font><font size="2"><a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#charges">Charges expected in baby's death at abortion business</a></font><font size="2"><br />
<a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#ban">Seminary President Defends Ban on Charismatic Practices</a><br />
</font><font size="2"><a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#west">Persecution is Coming to the West</a></font><font size="2"><br />
<a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#lucy">Evolutionists Love 'Lucy,' But AIG Calls Fossil Tour Anti-Creationist Hype</a></font><font size="2"><br />
<a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#employ">Employee Fired for Pro-Marriage Sign Reinstated</a></font><font size="2"><br />
<a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#fl">Florida Supreme Court Rejects Wiccan Tax Challenge</a> <br />
</font><font size="2"><a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#fire">Fire-bombed church: 'We forgive attacker'</a></font><font size="2"><br />
<a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#cross">College removes cross &ndash; from <em>chapel!</em></a></font><font size="2"><br />
<a href="http://blaisebaptist.com/common/fckeditor/editor/fckeditor.html?InstanceName=PageContents&amp;Toolbar=Default#lead">Lead Us Not Into Temptation</a></font></div>
<div><font size="5"><font size="4"><strong>Indiana Mom Blasts ACLU Attack on Release-Time Religious Training Program<br />
</strong></font><font size="+0"><font size="1"><strong>By Jim Brown<br />
October 30, 2006</strong></font></font></font> <br />
</div>
<div><font size="2">(AgapePress) - A Christian mom in Indiana is praying the American Civil Liberties Union will not succeed in shutting down a release-time religious education program in her children's school district. <br />
<br />
The ACLU recently filed a lawsuit challenging a program in the Mooresville school district that allows third and fourth graders to leave the classroom for one hour a week to learn about topics such as the creation, the flood, and key figures in the Old Testament. A parent objected to the fact that the classes are held in a trailer on school property and teachers hand out enrollment cards to students wishing to participate. </font></div>
<div><font size="2">The ACLU claims it does not have a problem with the release-time program itself. Rather, the civil liberties group says it objects to the fact that the religious classes are held on school property and that teachers are involved in collecting parental permission slips from students who enroll. But according to one of the community parents, the lawsuit is not sitting well with the majority of Mooresville residents. </font></div>
<div><font size="2">Jacoba Ballard has lived in Mooresville all her life, and one of her children attends the release-time program at Neil Armstrong Elementary, the school at the center of the controversy. She says many people in her community are deeply involved in this issue, as they believe in God and support the religious education program.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">&quot;Most of the people here do,&quot; Ballard notes, &quot;and it's just pretty sad that one person is going to change that for all of us -- and hopefully they don't.&quot; She says the release-time program is helping to teach her son moral values and the importance of loving God. </font></div>
<div><font size="2">Besides, the Christian mom contends, the ACLU has no legal standing to interfere with or to protest the program, she contends, because the school is not subsidizing it. She points out that those providing the religious instruction even offered to pay rent for the use of school facilities.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">&quot;The school does not fund the program in any way,&quot; Ballard says, &quot;and nor does our tax dollars.&quot; The money comes from churches and other donors, she asserts; so, along with other community parents who support the release-time program, she is hopeful that the ACLU will not be able to shut the religious education classes down.</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><font size="4"><strong>City penalized for barring 'Jesus dancers'</strong></font><br />
<font color="#000000">Dropped girls from festival because of 'Christian' T-shirts, song</font><br />
By James L. Lambert<br />
&copy; 2006 WorldNetDaily.com </font></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><font size="2">Six girls barred from performing in a city's holiday show because they wore &quot;Jesus Christ Dancers&quot; shirts settled a </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47982"><font size="2">federal lawsuit</font></a><font size="2"> in which they were awarded $3,000 each. </font>
<div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.afa.net/clp/"><font size="2">The American Family Association Center for Law &amp; Policy</font></a><font size="2">, representing the girls and their instructor, reached an agreement with the city of Chula Vista, which refused to let them perform &quot;because of the Christian message on their T-shirts and the Christian theme music they planned to dance to.&quot; </font>
<div><font size="2">As </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47837"><font size="2">WND reported</font></a><font size="2">, the girls, ages 8 to 12, were scheduled to perform a hip-hop dance routine Dec. 3, 2005, at a &quot;Holiday Festival.&quot; </font>
<div><font size="2"><em>(Story continues below)</em> </font>
<div>
<div><font size="2">A consent decree signed Oct. 24 ordered the city to pay $3,000 to each of the girls and to their dance instructor. Another $10,000 is to be paid for attorney fees and costs. Also included in the settlement is a requirement by the court for the city &quot;to provide First Amendment training on an annual basis to its police officers and all city employees who are classified as mid-managers and above.&quot; </font>
<div><font size="2">Attorney Brian Fahling said Chula Vista &quot;is to be commended for stepping forward and acknowledging it violated the girl's constitutional rights.&quot; </font>
<div><font size="2">Tim Wildmon, president of the American Center of Law &amp; Policy's parent group, the American Family Association, said &quot;the girls had a great civics lesson in all of this &hellip; they learned that asserting their constitutional rights benefits not just them, but all of us.&quot; </font>
<div><font size="2">The dancers were listed first on the Holiday Festival's schedule of performers, but officials kept the girls waiting 80 minutes as they deliberated about whether to allow the act, according to the instructor, Lita Ramirez. </font>
<div><font size="2">When finally informed they could not perform, the girls began to cry, some hysterically, parents said. </font>
<div><font size="2">Ramirez described the experience as humiliating. </font>
<div><font size="2">Fahling, at the time, called the conduct of Chula Vista officials &quot;inexcusable.&quot; </font>
<div><font size="2">&quot;The city allowed a Hawaiian prayer dance, a belly dancer and other 'holiday' performers, and there was a tree-lighting ceremony afterward where a rabbi lighted a menorah, but six young girls wearing T-shirts with 'Jesus Dancer' and a cross silk-screened on them was too offensive,&quot; he said. </font>
<div><font size="2">The lawsuit alleged the city's decision &quot;was impermissible viewpoint-based discrimination against religious speech in a public forum.&quot; </font>
<div><font size="2">Specifically, the complaint said the city prohibited &quot;the name of Jesus being displayed and the songs with words that praise the Christian God from being played while permitting other religious and secular songs and expression.&quot; </font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><font size="2"><strong><font size="4">School Shootings Signal Need for Dads' Involvment</font></strong><br />
<font color="#000000">Jim Brown and Jenni Parker</font><br />
<font color="#000000">Agape Press</font><br />
<br />
</font><font size="2">A school safety expert says if the crisis of violence in America's schools is going to be curbed, it's necessary for fathers and father figures to play a more active role in their children's lives.</font></div>
<div><font size="2">James Moore is the founder and president of the Springhill, Arkansas-based group </font><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.watchdogs.net/"><font size="2">WATCH D.O.G.S.</font></a><font size="2"> His organization encourages fathers to get involved in the lives of their k